Anikó Dudás, PhD Hungary

Post on 01-Jan-2016

31 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Who A re the U sers and W hat A re T heir E xpectations? * Aspects of Academic Bibliographies. Anikó Dudás, PhD Hungary. Bibliography in the Digital Age IFLA Satellite Meeting National Library of Poland, Warsaw, 9 August 2012. Presentation Outline. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript

Who Are the Users and What Are Their Expectations?

*Aspects of Academic Bibliographies

Anikó Dudás, PhD

Hungary

Bibliography in the Digital AgeIFLA Satellite Meeting

National Library of Poland, Warsaw, 9 August 2012

Presentation Outline

1. Users of NBs and their expectations: Hungarian Academic Publication and Citation Database (MTMT)

2. Sources (respecting disc fileds of Humanities and Social Sciences)

3. Special MTMT data elements in comparison with data used in standard bib description

1. Hungarian Academic Publication and Citation Database (MTMT)

bibliographical data of researchers’, professors’ publications and citations

Based on Bibliographical data But the database itself is not a universal bibliograpy

system Focuces particularly on

• Hungarica data – restricted to the publications of contemporary, learned „Hungarus” authors

• Personal and institutional research publication output

• Citations should be collected as well

Publication

Citation

Some specific expectations

• up-to-date register of publications & citations• data-entering is carried out by registered users

(researchers) and operators• authentic, verified• a tool for monitoring and mapping Hungarian research

publication output • display options: by persons, institutions (affiliation

must be attached) and so many other views• serves as a basic bibliometric aid• data should be re-usable in R&D information systems• Bibliography Commettee is responsible for metadata

improvements

A personal publication listA personal publication list

Display options

MTMT: detailed citation list

MTMT: some figures Launched in 2009 (by bringing together

several STM databases) Members are:

• Independent individuals • Persons affiliated with organizations:

• research institutions of HAS• most outstanding research universities • other universities• colleges, hospitals• government bodies• for-profit organizations are interested as well

MTMT figures

Sept. 2011 Aug. 2012

Registered authors

12,700 29,687 134% growth rate

Institutions 30 40

Operators 5001012 (10 in

central office)doubled

Number of publication records Number of citation records

Articles 387,573Dependent

citations 455,428

Books 96, 597Independent

citations2,076,772

Book chapters 111,705 Not marked 104,778

Patents 3,170  

Dissertations 5,916  

Other works 70,497  

Publications in total

833,504 Citations in total 2,636978

Number of publications and citations (Aug. 2012)

Growth

Data growth (Sept. 2011- Aug. 2012)

0

500000

1000000

1500000

2000000

2500000

3000000

09.

10.

11.

12.

2012

.02

.03

.04

.05

.06

.07

.08

.

Timeline (months)

Nu

mb

er o

f re

cord

s

Publications in total

Citations in total

Growth rate:

C: 40%C: 40%

P:26%P:26%

Ratio of publication types

Ratio of publication types (Aug. 2012)

Books14%

Book chapters17%

Articles57%

Other w orks11%

Dissertations1%Patents

0,5%

Data are not limited solely to scholarly works and to „soft” disciplines

Ratio of the three main types

Ratio of books, b.chapters and articles (Aug. 2012)

Books16%

Book chapters19%

Articles65%

Data are not limited solely to scholarly works and to „soft” disciplines

PPCU FH – local database (2010)Academic publications – by publication types

9%

54%

37%

Books (authored) Book chapters Journal articles

Data are limited to scholarly works; „soft” fieldsMore than half appear in books

79%

21%

Hungarian Foreign languages

77%

23%

Published in Hungary Published abroad

2. Sources for populating Importing (WoS, Scopus, Medline etc.) – main sorurces in STM fields; but less

important in AHSS fields Manual input (typing), one by one (by authors, operators) is the

main way of uploading technological gap: re-use of quality library

metadata is not yet implemented BUT: large-scale development is in progress,

improvements can be expected So far NBs are used for manual/visual verification of

bib data; for adding missing data etc. In future: automatic or semi-automatic linking, data-

transfer and verification processes will take place

Difficulties: analytics (AHSS fields)

Analytical entries:• No suitable global tools for book chapters

• nor for articles published in nat. journals In Hu:

• HUMANUS – covers A&H, some SS fields, contains analytics on books and journals

• MATARKA – CC (TOC) service for Hu journals

• The two services (+ EPA=e-journals) partially overlap

Can be regarded as some extensions of the regular HuNB

Difficulties: citation level (AHSS fields)

Discovering, collecting and filling in citations – lies upon the shoulders of the researchers

One need much time Some help: scholar.google; Google Scholar

Citation Initiatives for national citation indexes

(Serbia; India – restricted; HU – pilot project) Developing a useful joint service would be

welcome to facilitate recording citations

3. MTMT data elements – characteristics

Name: traced in the case of a registered person; otherwise uncontrolled

Name (from authority file), AAP

Affiliation

Taxonomies: (1) Form; (2) Genre; (3) Character by intended audience

Adding authors, authorship information (in bib record)

Name (whatever form) << names from external sources are coming over here

MTMT controlled name (attached from authority file)

AffiliationsAuthorship portion

• Relator terms are used instead of the statement of responsibility• Number of attached authors are not limited• All authors and corporate collaborators can be listed but are not displayed in default setting

Affiliation

On personal level

On publication level(two inst. are sharing the same publ.)

Descriptive data Simplified, minimal level Enriched by specific

Form/Genre/Character IDs for works are wellcome So far only two kinds of

authorships were distinguished (author / editor) – some more terms will be added to the vocabulary

Types of authorshipsAuthorships

English Hungarian

Author Szerző

Editor Szerkesztő

Other authorships

Editor of critical edition Kritikai kiadás készítője

Editor of primary source edition Forráskiadás készítője

Text editor Szöveggondozó

Translator Fordító

Other contributor roles Egyéb közreműködő Subtypes of ‘Other contributor roles'

Compiler Válogatta

Compiler of the bibliography A bibliográfiát gondozta

Collector Gyűjtötte

Collaborator in editing Sajtó alá rendezte

Interviewee Az interjút adta

Relator terms

Character of the work (according to the intended audience)

Academic Popular science

Of public interest Educational

Form/genre controlled vocabulary Used to distinguish and classify research publication

products Bibliography Committee has finished recently the

harmonization, simplification of descriptors Term list includes descriptors for:

• Published academic works

• Art works (artistic, technical)

• Patents (Protection forms)

• Dissertations Implementation of the revised set of descriptors is

expected in autumn

Form/genre controlled vocabulary (types of publications) Term list contains appr. 70 descriptors Different types might be credited or waived in evaluation

processes They might be given different credit points

Descriptor (English) Also includes Descriptor (Hungarian) Also includes (Hungarian)

Academic writing Study, Academic paper Szaktanulmány Műelemzés

Essay Esszé

Foreword, Afterword Introduction, Preface Előszó, utószó Bevezetés

Review Book review, Discussion note, Critical notice

Recenzió/kritika Bírálat, Tanulmány-kritika,

Arts criticism Art review Műkritika

Edition of primary sources

Text edition, Publication, translation of sources with commentary

Forráskiadás Szövegkiadás, Forrás kommentált fordítása

Types of book chapters (a small detail)

Special metadata requirements for journals

So far: Impact factors by

years Peer reviewed/not pr These are rather

standards suitable for STM fields

There is a need for developing other methods for verification the real scientific/scholarly nature of a publication.

Linking to NB Periodicals would be essential.

Bibliometric implementations

Automated counting, sorting of publications and citations

Summarizing IF values Hirsch index Display options for bibliometric data are

available

Bibliometrics Bibliometric data for Katalin É. Kiss

Why to be interlinked with NBs? Data creation and processingcreation and processing: re-using qualitative

and authentic data from NBs Analytical entries (tables of contents) can be also usable VerificationVerification (standard, permanent links, data linking,

open identifiers are significant) In turn, NBs can benefit from the early stages of

metadata life-cycle – data often appear first in MTMT, swift data can be re-used, completed, enriched

Specific metadata added by users and/or operators of the academic bibliography can enrich the NB.

Who Are the Users and What Are Their Expectations?

*Aspects of Academic Bibliographies

www.mtmt.hu

Anikó Dudás, PhD

Hungary

Bibliography in the Digital AgeIFLA Satellite Meeting

National Library of Poland, Warsaw, 9 August 2012

top related