andhrapradesh and telangana difference of major crops
Post on 15-Jul-2015
71 Views
Preview:
Transcript
GLOBAL AREA,PRODUCTION, PRODUCTIVITY OF RICE 2012-2013
S.NO CROP AREA Million hect
PRODUCTIONMillion tonnes
PRODUCTIVITYt/ha
1. RICE 106.1 491.0 2.4
PRODUCTION INCREASED
TOP PRODUCTION OF PADDY
GLOBAL AREA,PRODUCTION,PRODUCTIVITY OF WHEAT 2012-2013
S.NO CROP AREA 000 hect
PR ODUCTION Million tonnes
PRODUCTIVITY t/ha
1. WHEAT 227,312 713.2 3.01
WORLD WHEAT PRODUCTION
GLOBAL AREA,PRODUCTIN PRODUCTIVITY OFRAGI (FINGER MILLET)
S.NO CROP AREA Million hect
PRODUCTION Million tonnes
PRODUCTIVITYKg/ha
1. RAGI 38.10 28.38
INDIAN AREA,PRODUCTION,PRODUCTIVITY OF PADDY 2012-2013
S.NO CROP AREAMillion hect
PRODUCTION Million tonnes
PRODUCTIVITYKg/ha
1. PADDY 42.41 104.4 2462
INDIAN AREA,PRODUCTION,PRODUCTIVITY OF WHEAT 2012-2013
S.NO CROP AREAMillion hect
PRODUCTION Million tonnes
PRODUCTIVITYKg/ha
1. WHEAT 29.65 92.46 3118
INDIAN AREA ,PRODUCTION,PRODUCTIVITY OF RAGI 2012-2013
S.NO CROP AREA 000 hect
PRODUCTION 000 Tonnes
PRODUCTIVITYKg/ha
1. RAGI 1,381 2040 1477
ANDHRAPRADESH
&
TELANGANA
RICE PRODUCTION IN A.P & T.G 2012-2013
S.NO STATE AREA 000 HECT
Kharif& Rabi
PRODUCTION 000 TONNES
Kharif& Rabi
PRODUCTIVITYK g/Ha
Kharif& Rabi
1. ANDHRAPRADESH
2212 6863 6214
2. TELANGANA
1417 4647 5608
WHEAT PRODUCTION IN A.P&T.G 2012-2013
S.NO STATE AREA 000 HECTARES Kharif&rabi
PRODUCTION 000 TONNES
Kharif&rabi
PRODUCTIVITY Kg/ha Kharif&rabi
1. ANDHRAPRADESH 0 0 270
2. TELANAGANA 8 9690
RAGI PRODUCTION IN A.P&T.G 2012-2013
S.NO CROP AREA Kharif&Rabi
000 hect
PR ODUCTION 000 TONNES
PR ODUCTIVITY Kg/ha
1. ANDHRAPRADESH
38 42 1773
2. TELANGANA 3 3 731
SWOT ANALYSIS AFTER BIFURCATION OF A.P & T.G
COMPARSION OF A.P& T.G
STRENGHTS• Capacity to produce seed production in large
areas
• Palm provides livelihood to significant number of families
• IT Sector is well devoloped to dessiminatetechnology
WEAKNESESS
• Spourios seed production
• Irrigation facilities are not well devoloped
• Not suited to grow water loving crops
OPPURTUNITIES
• Use IT to deliver scientific advices to farmers
• Pig farming can be taken up as livelihood to farmers
• Development of palm research centre
THREATS
• Ground water exploitation
• Lack of suitable irrigation projects
• More dependence on IT
• Real estate is increasing
SWOT
ANDHRA PRADESH
STRENGHTS
• Suitable agro climatic conditions for cotton,paddy
• cropping systems along with dairy animals
• Good network of canals and tube wells for irrigation
• Less urban biasness, predominantly being rural districts
• Receptive and innovative farmers with large acceptance of recommended inputs
WEAKNESSES
• Rainfall is highly erratic.
• Increase in incidence of pests and diseases
• Injudicious use of pesticides.
• Monoculture of cotton-wheat, rice–wheat cropping systems and their adverse
effects on natural assets
• Local labour availability scarce and costly
OPPURTUNITIES• Production and Productivity of paddy can be increased. •
• Suitable agro climatic conditions for diversification within in cotton- rice cropping rice systems.
• Mechanization for solving the problems of labour.• Improving information and communication technology for real time
extension• Establishment of commodity based and /or technology based farmers
associations.• Improving the linkages and synergies with private sector, NGOs and other
public sector organisations• Electricity consumption
THREATS
• Capital construction
• Water disputes
• Real estate boom
ORGANISATION OF ICRISAT
ICRISAT
top related