Advanced Modern Macroeconomics · Chapter 5: Investment and Savings Chapter Summary Goods output divided between consumption and savings. Consumer savings goes to –rms which use

Post on 02-Aug-2020

5 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

Transcript

Advanced Modern MacroeconomicsSavings and Investment

Max Gillman

Cardi¤ Business School

18 October 2010

Gillman (Cardi¤ Business School) Chapter 5 18 October 2010 1 / 38

Chapter 5: Investment and SavingsChapter Summary

Goods output divided between consumption and savings.

Consumer savings goes to �rms which use it for investment.

Consumer subtracts capital from consumption today

to yield more consumption in next period.this de�nes the capital available to �rms for production.

Makes for capital supply and capital demand.

Only a two period model; initial output given exogenously.

All capital used up in production process.

Intertemporal problem with consumption smoothing across time.

Gillman (Cardi¤ Business School) Chapter 5 18 October 2010 2 / 38

Building on the Last Chapters

Last chapter on intratemporal substitution: goods, leisure.

Same tools now for capital theory, intertemporal substitution.

Instead of goods-leisure choice: consumption today, tomorrow.

Mathematical form of budget almost identical Part 2.

Allocation of time constraint, with given time endowment.now allocation of consumption, investment with given goodsendowment.Budget constraint also similar when decentralized:

consumption equals labor wages plus pro�ts,now consumption equals capital savings return plus pro�t.

Decentralization: marginal product of capital key instead of marginalproduct of labor.

Gillman (Cardi¤ Business School) Chapter 5 18 October 2010 3 / 38

Learning Objective

The student conceptualizes how capital is saved and invested

Key step of intertemporal consumption smoothing,

Focus on intertemporal margin in simplest framework

Sets up understanding margin in full dynamic economy.

See margin as key to determining growth rate of the economy.

Gillman (Cardi¤ Business School) Chapter 5 18 October 2010 4 / 38

Who Made It Happen: Capital Theory

Adam Smith 1776: output equals current consumption and capital"The general stock of any country ... naturally divides itself into... thatportion which is reserved for immediate consumption, and ... �xedcapital...and circulating capital... that... a¤ords a revenue or pro�t.

Bohm-Bawerk�s 1888 The Positive Theory of CapitalFisher: 2-period general equilibrium intertemporal optimization,

1896 Appreciation and Interest, 1907 The Rate of Interest, 1930Theory of Interest,

Ramsey�s 1928 "A Mathematical Theory of Saving"modern general equilibrium capital accumulation over all time.

Knut Wicksell�s 1901 Lectures on Political Economycapital a factor used in production of output, along with only labor.No more classic theory of land, labor, capital as inputs

Friedman�s 1957 Theory of the Consumption Functionpermanent income hypothesis of consumption, 2-period model.

Solow 1956 explains economic growth.Gillman (Cardi¤ Business School) Chapter 5 18 October 2010 5 / 38

Representative Agent Intertemporal Economy

Maxc0,c1,k1,y1

u (c0, c1)

y0 = c0 + k1.

c1 = y1 = f (k1) .

Maxk1

u[y0 � k1, f (k1)].

∂u (c0, c1)∂c0

∂ (y0 � k1)∂k1

+∂u (c0, c1)

∂c1

∂ [f (k1)]∂k1

= 0.

MPk �∂f (k1)

∂k1=

∂u(c0,c1)∂c0

∂u(c0,c1)∂c1

� MRSc0,c1

Gillman (Cardi¤ Business School) Chapter 5 18 October 2010 6 / 38

Log-utility and Cobb-Douglas Production

u = ln c0 + β ln c1,

β 2 (0, 1) parameter of "time preference".

MRSc0,c1 �∂ ln c0

∂c0

β ∂ ln c1∂c1

=1c0βc1

,

yt = AG lγt k

1�γt ,

γ 2 (0, 1) , lt = 1, production occurs only at time t = 1,

y1 = AG k1�γ1 ,

AG (1� γ) k�γ1 =

∂f∂k1

=

∂u(c0,c1)∂c0

β∂u(c0,c1)

∂c1

=1c0βc1

, (1)

Gillman (Cardi¤ Business School) Chapter 5 18 October 2010 7 / 38

Example 5.1

Target a reasonable growth rate in consumption of 2.5%.

Assume β = 0.98, γ = 0.5, AG = 12, y0 = 100 .

u = ln c0 + (0.98) ln c1, (2)

c1 = y1 = 12pk1.

100 = c0 + k1.

Maxk1u (c0, c1) = ln (100� k1) + (0.98) ln

�12pk1�.

� 1100� k1

+(0.98)(0.5)12k�0.51

12k0.51= 0. (3)

Gillman (Cardi¤ Business School) Chapter 5 18 October 2010 8 / 38

Equilibrium Solution

k1 =(98) (0.5)

1+ (.98) (0.5)= 32.886. (4)

c1 = 12p32.886 = 68.816, (5)

c0 = 100� 32.886 = 67.114. (6)

1+ g � c1c0=68.8267.11

= 1.0255,

g = 0.0255, or about 2.55%.

u = ln 67.114+ (0.98) ln (68.816) = 8.3532. (7)

c1 =�eu

c0

� 1β

=

�e8.3532

c0

� 10.98

. (8)

c1 = 12pk1 = 12

p100� c0. (9)

Gillman (Cardi¤ Business School) Chapter 5 18 October 2010 9 / 38

Graphically

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 1300

20

40

60

80

100

120

C0

C1

Figure 5.1. Intertemporal Consumption and Investment in Example 5.1.

Gillman (Cardi¤ Business School) Chapter 5 18 October 2010 10 / 38

Productivity Change: Example 5.2

β = 0.98, γ = 0.5, and AG doubles to 24 from 12 : c1 = y1 = 24pk1.

Maxk1u = ln (100� k1) + (0.98) ln

�24pk1�.

� 1100� k1

+(0.98)(0.5)24k�0.51

24k0.51= 0. (10)

Same solution for capital k1:

k1 =(98) (0.5)

1+ (.98) (0.5)= 32.89.

But next period consumption doubles:

c1 = 24p32.89 = 137.64.

Current consumption the same

c0 = 100� 32.89 = 67.11.Utility rises

u = ln 67.11+ (0.98) ln (137.64) = 9.03.Gillman (Cardi¤ Business School) Chapter 5 18 October 2010 11 / 38

Productivity Doubles

0 20 40 60 80 100 1200

50

100

150

200

250

C0

C1

Figure 5.2. Intertemporal Consumption with Doubling of Productivity inExample 5.2.

Gillman (Cardi¤ Business School) Chapter 5 18 October 2010 12 / 38

O¤setting Income and Substitution E¤ects

0 20 40 60 80 100 1200

50

100

150

200

C0

C1

Figure 5.3. Substitution E¤ect from Doubling of Capital Productivity inExample 5.2.

Gillman (Cardi¤ Business School) Chapter 5 18 October 2010 13 / 38

Decentralized Consumer and Firm Problems

Lend out k1 this period, get (1+ r) k1 next period: capital plusinterest.

Market clearingks1 = k

d1 , (11)

cd1 = cs1 = y1.

u = ln cd0 + β ln cd1 ,

cd0 = y0 � ks1 . (12)

cd1 = Π1 + ks1 (1+ r) . (13)

Gillman (Cardi¤ Business School) Chapter 5 18 October 2010 14 / 38

Wealth Constraint Form of Budget Constraints

cd11+ r

=Π1

1+ r+ ks1 ;

ks1 = y0 � cd0 ;

cd0 +cd11+ r

= y0 +Π1

1+ r.

With Π1 next period income, wealth W :

W � y0 +Π1

1+ r= cd0 +

cd11+ r

. (14)

Present discounted value of income equals discounted value ofconsumption

Use either wealth constraint or two budget constraints

Gillman (Cardi¤ Business School) Chapter 5 18 October 2010 15 / 38

Consumer Problem

Maxc0,c1,k s1

u = ln cd0 + β ln cd1

cd0 = y0 � ks1 , (15)

cd1 = Π1 + ks1 (1+ r) . (16)

Maxk s1

u = ln (y0 � ks1 ) + β ln [Π1 + (1+ r) ks1 ] .

β (1+ r)Π1 + ks1 (1+ r)

��

1y0 � ks1

�= 0.

ks1 =y0β

1+ β� Π1

(1+ β) (1+ r). (17)

Gillman (Cardi¤ Business School) Chapter 5 18 October 2010 16 / 38

Firm Problem

Maxkd1

Π1 = y1 � (1+ r) kd1 ,

y1 = f (kd1 ) = AG�kd1�1�γ

.

Maxkd1

Π1 = AG�kd1�1�γ

� (1+ r) kd1 . (18)

∂f (kd1 )∂kd1

= (1� γ)AG�kd1��γ

= 1+ r . (19)

Gillman (Cardi¤ Business School) Chapter 5 18 October 2010 17 / 38

Example 5.3: Firm

AG = 12, γ = 0.5, y0 = 100, β = 0.98 :

y1 = 12�kd1�0.5

;

(0.5) 12�kd1��0.5

= 1+ r . (20)

kd1 =36

(1+ r)2. (21)

Π1 = 12

s36

(1+ r)2� 36 (1+ r)(1+ r)2

=361+ r

. (22)

y1 = 12

s36

(1+ r)2=

721+ r

. (23)

Gillman (Cardi¤ Business School) Chapter 5 18 October 2010 18 / 38

Example 5.3: Capital Market Equilibrium

ks1 =y0β

1+ β� Π1

(1+ β) (1+ r)=

y0β

1+ �

11+ β

�36

(1+ r)2. (24)

kd1 =36

(1+ r)2=

y0β

1+ �

11+ β

�36

(1+ r)2= ks1 . (25)

r =

s36 (2+ β)

y0β� 1 =

r36 (2.98)98

� 1 = 0.0463. (26)

kd1 =36

(1+ r)2=

36

(1.0463)2= 32.89;

ks1 =981.98

��11.98

�36

(1.0463)2= 32.89.

1+ r =6�

kd1�0.5 , 1+ r = 6

(y0β� (1+ β) ks1 )0.5 (27)

Gillman (Cardi¤ Business School) Chapter 5 18 October 2010 19 / 38

Example 5.3: Rest of Equilibrium

y1 =721+ r

=72

1.0463= 68.81. (28)

Π1 =361+ r

=36

1.0463= 34.41. (29)

cd0 = 100� ks1 = 67.12. (30)

y1 = cd1 = Π1 + ks1 (1+ r) = 34.41+ 32.88 (1.0463) = 68.81. (31)

1+ g =c1c0=68.8267.11

= 1.0255,

u = ln 67.12+ 0.98 ln 68.81 = 8.35.

Savings rate: k1y0 =32.88100 , or 33%.

Gillman (Cardi¤ Business School) Chapter 5 18 October 2010 20 / 38

Example 5.3: Capital Market Graph

31 32 33 34 35 361.00

1.02

1.04

1.06

1.08

K1 Capital

1+r

Figure 5.4. Savings and Investment: Aggregate Supply and Demand forCapital in Example 5.3.

Gillman (Cardi¤ Business School) Chapter 5 18 October 2010 21 / 38

Goods Market

c0 = y0 � ks1 = 50.51+18.18

(1+ r)2. (32)

cd1 = Π1 + ks1 (1+ r) = 49.49 (1+ r) +17.821+ r

.

cs1 = y1 =721+ r

. (33)

u = ln 67.12+ (0.98) ln 68.81 = 8.35.

11+ r

=�B �

pB2 � 4AC2A

=cd1 �

q�cd1�2 � 4 (17.82) (49.49)2 (17.82)

. (34)

11+ r

=cs172. (35)

Gillman (Cardi¤ Business School) Chapter 5 18 October 2010 22 / 38

Future Goods Market Graphically

64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72

0.90

0.92

0.94

0.96

0.98

1.00

C1,Y1

1/(1+r)

Figure 5.5. Market for Future Period Consumption in Example 5.3.

Gillman (Cardi¤ Business School) Chapter 5 18 October 2010 23 / 38

General Equilibrium: Add Budget Line

cd1 = Π1 + ks1 (1+ r) =36

1.0463+ (100� c0) (1.0463).

0 50 100 1500

50

100

150

C0

C1

Figure 5.6. General Equilibrium Intertemporal Consumption with MarketLine in Example 5.3.

Gillman (Cardi¤ Business School) Chapter 5 18 October 2010 24 / 38

Example 5.4: Productivity Increase by 5%

γ = 0.5, y0 = 100, β = 0.98; AG : up by 5% to 12 (1.05) = 12.6

Maxkd1

Π1 = 12.6qkd1 � (1+ r)kd1 , (36)

kd1 =39.69

(1+ r)2,Π1 =

39.691+ r

.y1 =79.381+ r

. (37)

1+ r =

s39.69kd1

. (38)

ks1 = 49.49�20.045

(1+ r)2, 1+ r =

s20.045

49.49� ks1. (39)

ks1 = 49.49�20.045

(1+ r)2=

39.69

(1+ r)2= kd1 .

1+ r =

r(39.69+ 20.045)

49.49= 1.0986,

Gillman (Cardi¤ Business School) Chapter 5 18 October 2010 25 / 38

Graphical Capital Market: No Change in Capital

29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 381.00

1.05

1.10

1.15

K1 Capital

1+r

Figure 5.7. Shift in Supply and Demand for Capital from a ProductivityIncrease in Example 5.4.

Gillman (Cardi¤ Business School) Chapter 5 18 October 2010 26 / 38

Future Goods Market

cd1 = 49.49 (1+ r) +19.6451+ r

. (40)

11+ r

=�B �

pB2 � 4AC2A

=cd1 �

q�cd1�2 � 4 (19.6) (49.5)2 (19.645)

. (41)

cs1 =79.381+ r

,

11+ r

=cs179.38

. (42)

Gillman (Cardi¤ Business School) Chapter 5 18 October 2010 27 / 38

Future Goods Market Graphically: Output Rises

67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 750.85

0.90

0.95

1.00

C1,Y1

1/(1+r)

Figure 5.8. Market for Future Period Consumption with 5% ProductivityIncrease in Example 5.4 (black) versus Example 5.3 (red).

Gillman (Cardi¤ Business School) Chapter 5 18 October 2010 28 / 38

Current Period Income Endowment: Example 5.5

y0 rise by 5% to 105, all other parameters at baseline.

k1 =105 (0.98) (0.5)1+ (0.98) (0.5)

= 34.53.

Savings rate the same:

k1y0=34.53105

= 0.3289.

But capital investment rises.

c0 = 105� 34.53 = 70.47.

cs1 = y1 = 12pk1 = 12 (34.53)

0.5 = 70.52,

Lower growth rate near to zero:

g =c1c0� 1 = 70.52

70.47� 1 = 0.0007.

Gillman (Cardi¤ Business School) Chapter 5 18 October 2010 29 / 38

Utility Level Curves and Production Possibility Curves

u = ln (105� k1) + (0.98) ln�12pk1�,

u = ln (105� 34.53) + (0.98) ln�12p34.53

�= 8.4259,

cd1 =

�eu

c0

� 1β

=

�e8.4259

c0

� 10.98

.

cs1 = 12pk1 = 12

p105� c0. (43)

Gillman (Cardi¤ Business School) Chapter 5 18 October 2010 30 / 38

General Equilibrium Graph: Goods Endowment Increase

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 1400

50

100

150

C0

C1

Figure 5.9. General Equilibrium Intertemporal Consumption with CurrentIncome Increase in Example 5.5 (dark red and blue) compared to Example

5.1.Gillman (Cardi¤ Business School) Chapter 5 18 October 2010 31 / 38

Decentralized Problem

ks1 =11.98

"105 (0.98)� 36

(1+ r)2

#, (44)

1+ r =

�36

105 (0.98)� 1.98ks1

�0.5. (45)

ks1 =11.98

"105 (0.98)� 36

(1+ r)2

#=

36

(1+ r)2= kd1 ; (46)

1+ r =

"36102.91.98

�1+

11.98

�#0.5= 1.021; (47)

kd1 =36

(1+ r)2=

36

(1.021)2= 34.534. (48)

Gillman (Cardi¤ Business School) Chapter 5 18 October 2010 32 / 38

Capital Market Graph: Current Goods Endowment Increase

31 32 33 34 35 361.00

1.02

1.04

1.06

1.08

K1 Capital

1+r

Figure 5.10. An Increase in Current Income Endowment in Example 5.5.

Gillman (Cardi¤ Business School) Chapter 5 18 October 2010 33 / 38

Future Goods Market

cd1 =361+ r

+

105 (0.98)1.98

� 36

1.98 (1+ r)2

!(1+ r) , (49)

11+ r

=�B �

pB2 � 4AC2A

=cd1 �

q�cd1�2 � 4 (17.82) (52)2 (17.818)

. (50)

11+ r

=cs172. (51)

Gillman (Cardi¤ Business School) Chapter 5 18 October 2010 34 / 38

Future Goods Market Graph: Output Rises, Interest RateFalls

66 68 70 72 740.90

0.92

0.94

0.96

0.98

1.00

C1,Y1

1/(1+r)

Figure 5.11. Market for Future Period Consumption in Example 5.3.

Gillman (Cardi¤ Business School) Chapter 5 18 October 2010 35 / 38

General Equilibrium Graph: Add Budget Lines

cd1 = Π1 + ks1 (1+ r) =361.021

+ (105� c0) (1.021);

40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100

120

C0

C1

Figure 5.12. General Equilibrium with Income Endowment Increase inExample 5.5 (darker red, blue, green) Compared to Example 5.3 (lighter

red, blue, green).

Gillman (Cardi¤ Business School) Chapter 5 18 October 2010 36 / 38

Applications: Savings Rate, Permanent Income, Debt Crisis

Saving ratio cross countries

­10

­5

0

5

10

15

20

25

Q1 195

5

Q4 195

6

Q3 195

8

Q2 196

0

Q1 196

2

Q4 196

3

Q3 196

5

Q2 196

7

Q1 196

9

Q4 197

0

Q3 197

2

Q2 197

4

Q1 197

6

Q4 197

7

Q3 197

9

Q2 198

1

Q1 198

3

Q4 198

4

Q3 198

6

Q2 198

8

Q1 199

0

Q4 199

1

Q3 199

3

Q2 199

5

Q1 199

7

Q4 199

8

Q3 200

0

Q2 200

2

Q1 200

4

Q4 200

5

Q3 200

7

Savi

ng ra

tio

Australia

Canada

United Kingdom

United States

Figure: Figure 5.13. Savings Ratios, 1955-2007, Australia, Canada, UK and US.

Gillman (Cardi¤ Business School) Chapter 5 18 October 2010 37 / 38

Explaining Low Savings Rates

Low savings rate policy issue if concern of consequences.May be consequence of "wealth e¤ect",

a result of rising permanent income stream.Market equity in corporations, homes, shot up in 1990s,seemed that permanent income was rising.As permanent income expected to rise more, less savings needed.

A theory based on expected permanent income, not current income."the permanent income hypothesis of consumption".Implies low savings rate not at a worry in policy sense,

if expectations of rising permanent income are realized.Dark underside to recent fall in savings rate:many houses bought by borrowing money: higher expected wealth.Collapse in stock market value 2007-2008 collapsed this wealth.Many houses foreclosed and repossessed by banks.

Simple economic response to rising wealth, a low savings rate,became urgent policy issue once wealth collapsed and debt could notbe repaid.

Gillman (Cardi¤ Business School) Chapter 5 18 October 2010 38 / 38

top related