Adaptive Tetrahedral Remeshing for Multi Phase Flow Simulation in OF_2009_Schmidt_slides

Post on 27-Jul-2015

242 Views

Category:

Documents

7 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

Transcript

Adaptive Tetrahedral Remeshingfor Multiphase Flow Simulations in

OpenFOAM

Sandeep Menon and David P. Schmidt

Multiphase Flow Simulation LaboratoryUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst

June 3, 2009

Off-center Droplet Collision

M. Dai and D. P. Schmidt,

“Numerical Simulation of Head-On Droplet Collision: Effect of Viscosity on Maximum Deformation”,

Phys. Fluids, 17(4), 2005.

Motivation

Pros and Cons:Accurate interface representation.Direct application of interface boundaryconditions.Conserves mass very well.Complicated mesh manipulation withlocalized remeshing and interpolation.

Lagrangian interface tracking:Interface points move with the interfacenormal velocityThe interior mesh automatically adjusts tomaintain mesh qualityWe only use simplical meshes

Prior Work

Since last year:Two-dimensional version in OF completedDemonstrated for ink jetsPublished in ILASS 2008, ICLASS 2009

Interface tracking capabilities in OpenFOAM:interTrackFoam - Prior work on interfacetracking by Zeljko Tukovic and Hrvoje Jasak.Uses the freeSurface library, also developedby Tukovic and Jasak.Used mesh-motion only - limited deformationcapability.tetDecomposition mesh motion solver.

Three Major Code Components

Incompressible PISO solverMesh motionMesh reconnections

Tetrahedral Mesh Motion

Current state of techniques:Laplacian smoothing - fast,simple, but createsdegenerate cells.Need to associate meshmotion with mesh quality.Alternative:optimization-basedsmoothing.Optimize algebraic meshquality metrics.More expensive thanLaplacian smoothing, butvery effective.

Tetrahedral Mesh Motion

Mesquite Optimization Library:Developed by Sandia NationalLabs.OpenFOAM wrapper class -mesquiteSmoother.Run-time selection of:É Optimization algorithms: CG,

Steepest Descent, FeasibleNewton, Quasi Newton, etc.

É Quality metrics: ConditionNumber, Inverse Mean Ratio,Aspect Ratio, etc.

É Termination Criteria: RelativeQuality Improvement, L2 norm,iterations, CPU Time, etc

Mean Ratio =12(3V2)1/3∑6

iL2e

Atomic Topology Operations

Arbitrary number of tetrahedra sharing an edge.Dynamic Programming algorithm to define swap configuration.

3D Edge Flip2D Edge Flip

Combination of Swap Operations

3-2 swapEquitorial Polygon2-3 swap4 cells sharing an edge

Possible Configurations

7 sides, 42 ways

6 sides, 14 ways5 sides, 5 ways

Tetrahedral Bisection and Collapse

Test Case: Rotating & Translating Sphere

Test Case: Rotating & Translating Sphere

Test Case: Rotating & Translating Sphere

Ink Jet Simulation

Conclusion

Future work...Automated interface topology modifications for dropletbreak-up and coalesence.Effective divergence-free local interpolation.Hybrid parallelization efforts: MPI and pthreads.

Work In Progress...Non-Newtonian effects.Temperature-dependent viscosity and surface-tension effects.

top related