Transcript
By Drake Lau, EIT
To provide a better (safer and easier) access to people with moving difficulties to enter sidewalks from roadways
To meet the codes
Approach Methods
Caltrans Revised Standards Plan
Scoring System
PED Ramps Evaluation Table◦ Examples
Conclusion
Recommendation
Computer Based Research◦ PED ramps background info
United States Access Board
ADA Best Practices Tool Kit forState and Local Governments
2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design
Field Work (107/477 curb ramps)◦ Measuring and recording curb ramps one-by-one
Case C Scoring Sheet
Example◦ Click Here to Open Spreadsheet
Case A PED Ramps Condition
Number(Out of 8)
Excellent 2Good 6Fair 0Poor 0
Case B PED Ramps Condition
Number(Out of 14)
Excellent 0Good 6Fair 8Poor 0
Case C PED Ramps Condition
Number(Out of
85)
Excellent 10Good 51Fair 12Poor 12
PED Ramps Condition (Total)
Number(Out of 107)
Excellent 12Good 63Fair 20Poor 12
Yellow - ExcellentGreen - GoodBlue - FairRed - Poor
Limited budget
Poor condition curb ramps have highest priority
Concentrated on one location
Might need to construct a new sidewalk (Park)
https://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and-standards/buildings-and-sites/about-the-ada-standards/guide-to-the-ada-standards
https://www.ada.gov/pcatoolkit/app1curbramps.pdf
https://www.ada.gov/pcatoolkit/chap6toolkit.htm
https://www.ada.gov/regs2010/2010ADAStandards/2010ADAstandards.htm#pgfId-1009823
Thank You !
top related