Transcript
Technology Integration:
Data Analysis and Recommendations
by Susan Ferdon EDTECH 554 Master of Educational Technology Program FA10 Boise State University
Table of Contents
List of Tables and Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 3
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 4
Data Collection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 4 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 5 Discussion and Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 11 Initial Technology Integration Survey page 11 Survey Return Rate page 12 Professional Development - Planning page 13 Professional Development - Training Sessions page 15 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 20 Appendices Appendix A Technology Integration Tiers page 21 Appendix B Data Cell Label Edits – Excel Spreadsheet page 23
List of Tables and Figures
Table 1: Technology Integration Survey Return Rate . . . . . . . . . . . page 6
Table 2: Technology Integration - Highest Performing Schools . . . page 10
Figure 1: Technology Integration Tiers - District . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 7
Figure 2: Technology Integration Tiers - Primary Role . . . . . . . . . . page 8
Figure 3: Technology Integration Tiers - Elementary Schools . . . . page 9
Figure 4: Technology Integration Tiers - Middle Schools . . . . . . . . . page 9
Figure 5: Technology Integration Tiers - High Schools . . . . . . . . . . page 11
Introduction In this scenario, the Pleasant View school district is addressing concerns that
technology is not being used to its full potential in classrooms. Board members are
concerned about adequately preparing students with the 21st century learning skills
necessary upon graduating from High School in Pleasant View School District. Further,
the district did not meet the federal Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) in Math for the
second year in a row, placing it in improvement status. Pleasant View teachers took a
Self-Evaluation Technology Integration survey and the purpose of this report is to
present an analysis of survey data and submit recommendations for staff development.
Data Collection
Participants Teachers and administrators in Pleasant View School District’s 23 schools - 13
elementary schools, four middle schools, five high schools, and Hunt Center -
completed a survey in which they identified their current level of technology integration
based on a three-tiered system (see Appendix A). Though the actual number of
teachers at each school is not known, it is assumed that the return rate on the surveys
was significantly less than 100%. Also, some schools had a much lower return rate than
others. For example, one would expect at least two administrators per school (46+ in all)
yet only four administrators returned surveys (9%).
Procedures A self-evaluation survey was completed. It is assumed that respondents added
text to survey form fields, as there is little consistency among data labels (i.e. teacher –
3rd grade, 3rd grade, 3rd grade teacher, teacher, no title, blank, etc.).
Data Sources
Original survey data were provided in the form of an Excel spreadsheet with
respondent information grouped by school. Data were displayed in five columns: Tier 1,
Tier 2, Tier 3, Position, and Building/Department. Lack consistency in labeling made
sorting and data analysis difficult, so the original data was saved in a new Excel
spreadsheet (see Appendix B) and edited. The new spreadsheet placed content in
seven columns: Tier, School Type, Role 1, Role 2, Grade/Subject 1, Grade/Subject 2,
and School. Information within cells was edited for consistency of labeling. In the case
of dual roles, leadership positions were listed first as those individuals will impact more
than just their own classrooms/students. When multiple subject areas were indicated,
content areas were listed before assistant/support roles and NCLB subjects were listed
first. In addition to the worksheet with data from all respondents, worksheets were
generated that display data by school, by tier, and by role.
Formulas were used to disaggregate data by
• Integration Tier: 1, 2, 3. • School Type: Elementary, Middle School, High School, Hunt Center. • Role: Administrator, Instructional Coach, Coordinator, Department Head,
Interventionist, Library Media Specialist, Student Services, Support Staff, Teacher, no title.
For ease of sorting, Excel spreadsheet data were exported into a database program,
FileMaker Pro™. The original spreadsheet may be accessed at
http://edtech2.boisestate.edu/ferdons/554/data_oldview.xls. The new spreadsheet may
be accessed at http://edtech2.boisestate.edu/ferdons/554/data_newview.xlsx.
Results
The following results are based upon the 510 surveys completed by Pleasant
View teachers and administrators. Technology integration by other staff members is not
known at this time. For the purposes of this study a significant difference is one that is
calculated to be 5% or greater.
Return Rate
The number of teachers and administrators who returned the survey are
indicated in Table 1.
Survey Return Rate
Adm
inis
trat
or
Inst
ruct
iona
l C
oach
C
oord
inat
or /
Dep
t. H
ead
Inte
rven
tioni
st
Libr
ary
Med
ia
Spec
ialis
t St
uden
t Se
rvic
es
Supp
ort S
taff
Teac
her
(no
title
)
TOTA
L
Sign
ifica
nt
Diff
eren
ce
Hunt Center 1 NA 1 18 1 21 (N/A) Adams NA 1 13 1 15
Apple 2 NA 1 1 20 24 +67% Brown 1 NA 1 11 1 14 Bryant NA 9 1 10 -30%
Cherry 1 3 NA 1 1 8 1 15 Evergreen 1 NA 1 1 2 14 19 +32%
Garfield 1 NA 11 3 15 Jones 1 NA 2 2 2 16 23 +60%
Lynwood NA 24 24 +67% Maple 1 NA 1 8 10 -30%
Prairie NA 1 9 10 -30% Sandburg NA 1 2 10 13 -10%
Elem
enta
ry S
choo
ls
Wilson 1 NA 10 2 13 -10% East PV 1 1 1 9 9 -45% Lincoln 20 20 +15%
Washington 4 2 1 1 14 1 23 +32% Mid
dle
Scho
ols
West PV 2 1 13 1 17 Franklin 1 1 1 1 1 35 2 42
Huntington 1 1 1 2 1 5 50 61 +41% Mountainview 27 27 -36%
Newport 1 2 4 37 44
Hig
h Sc
hool
s
Pleasant View 1 3 1 1 35 41
TOTALS 4 21 8 8 15 20 2 418 14 510 Table 1.
Assuming that schools of the same type (elementary, middle school, etc.) are roughly
the same size, it is evident that there was quite a disparity in return rates between
buildings. In the table above, those schools with return rates that were significantly
lower (5% lower, or more) than the average are marked in red and those that are
significantly higher (5% higher, or more) are marked in green. Average return rates
were:
• Elementary School - Average number of returned surveys is14.6; 5% of 14.6 is .7. • Middle School - Average number of returned surveys is 17.3; 5% of 17.3 is .9. • High School - Average number of returned surveys is 43; 5% of 43 is 2.2.
District
Survey data show that the majority (78%) of Pleasant View teachers are
functioning at Technology Integration Tier 1.
Technology Integration Tiers - District
Figure 1.
Subgroups – Role When viewed as subgroups, based on primary role, most show similar
percentages of teachers at each tier (Figure 2). Exceptions are as follows:
• Administrators: 25% at Tier 3. However, that represents only one respondent, as there are only four in this subgroup.
• Coordinator/Department Head: None at Tier 3. • Student Services: None at Tier 2, higher percentages at Tiers 1 and 3. • Support Staff: All at Tier 1. However, there were only two respondents that could
be identified as Support Staff. • No Title: Larger percentages at Tier 2 (21%) and Tier 3 (14%), However,
incomplete information makes it impossible to know the roles of these individuals. • Of those subgroups with ten or more respondents, Library Media Specialists
have the greatest percentage at Tiers 2 and 3 (33% in all).
Technology Integration Tiers – Primary Role
Figure 2. Subgroups – Elementary Schools When viewed as subgroups, based on school, disparity was noted between
groups and when comparing groups to district percentages. Elementary data show that:
• Roughly half (6 of 13) of district elementary schools have teachers at all three Tiers.
• Seven elementary schools have teachers at one or two Tiers: o Maple Elementary teachers are at Tier 1 only. o Bryant Elementary has no teachers at Tier 2. o Five elementary schools have no teachers at Tier 3: Garfield, Jones,
Lynwood, Prairie and Wilson. • Brown Elementary has a significantly larger percentage of teachers at Tier 3
(21%) than the district average (8%). • Evergreen has the smallest percentage of teachers at Tier 1 (68%).
Technology Integration Tiers – Elementary Schools
Figure 3.
Subgroups – Middle Schools
Survey results from middle schools are, on the whole, similar to district
percentages. Three of the four middle schools have a higher than average percentage
of teachers at Tier 3, and one, Washington Middle School, has significantly fewer at Tier
1 (65%). West Pleasant View Middle School has none at Tier 3.
Technology Integration Tiers – Middle Schools
Figure 4.
Subgroups – High Schools Survey results from high schools show that three of the five schools have a
significantly larger number of teachers at Tier 1 (Franklin - 83%, Mountainview - 85%)
and one, Newport High School, has a significantly larger number of teachers at Tier 2
(23%) and Tier 3 (20%). Of all 23 schools in the district, Newport High School is the
most high-performing school in terms of self-reported technology integration.
Technology Integration Tiers – High Schools
Figure 5.
Hunt Center and Highest Performing Schools Hunt Center shows a significantly level of technology integration than the district
average and is in the top five when looking at both the lowest percentage at Tier 1 and
the highest percentage Tier 3 (Table 2).
Technology Integration - Highest Performing Schools
District Newport HS
Washington MS
Hunt Center
Evergreen Elem.
Brown Elem.
Tier 3 8% 20% 13% 19% 11% 21% Tier 2 14%
22% 23%
43% 22%
35% 14%
33% 21%
33% 7%
28%
Tier 1 78% 57% 65% 67% 68% 71% Table 2.
Discussion and Recommendations Initial Technology Integration Survey Discussion: The Technology Integration Survey that district administrators, teachers and staff
completed provides a good starting point for the planning of technology related staff
development activities. Classification into three tiers provides distinct separation
between levels of technology integration by respondents. However, survey construction
and format provides information that is, at times, limited. Some fields were left blank and
lack of standardization in labeling resulted in a wide variety of responses. In some
cases, erroneous information was entered. For example, in rows 271-274 the building is
a middle school but elementary grade levels are listed. Form fields that allow open-
ended responses provide great flexibility but make sorting and grouping a challenge.
The greatest percentage of individuals is in Tier 1 and there is likely quite a
diverse skill set represented, from those who have little or no experience with
technology to those who are on the borderline between Tiers 1 and 2. The combination
of gaps in information, large numbers of individuals at Tier 1, and low return rates result
in an incomplete picture of staff development needs. The gathering of additional
information would allow for staff development activities to most effectively address the
needs of this large and diverse staff.
Recommendations:
1.1 Prior to the planning of specific staff development activities, it is recommended
that staff be surveyed to determine more specific needs related to technology
training.
1.2 A survey similar to Sun Associates Sample Survey Instrument
(http://www.sun-associates.com/eval/samples/samplesurv.html) would provide
greater specificity when assessing needs.
1.3 In constructing the next survey, use of an electronic format would make data
collection and analysis much more efficient.
1.4 Checkboxes and other survey content should be made to correlate to district
hardware, software, and the desired uses of technology resources.
1.5 Eliminate acronyms (i.e., MHOH, SVL) or provide a listing of descriptions. This
will allow information to be more easily read and understood by a variety of
stakeholder groups.
1.6 If possible, survey selected parents and students to see how their perceptions
of technology integration compare with district administrators, teachers, and
staff.
Caveat: As with any self-reporting instrument, one must consider the possibility that
survey results have some degree of inherent bias. For example, individuals may inflate
reported skill levels as a means of enhancing their perceived effectiveness in the
classroom.
Survey Return Rate Discussion: Return rate varied a great deal between buildings and the return rate by
administrators was notably low (4). The fact that administrator return rate was so low in
an indication that one of several problems may have occurred:
• Administrators may not have been aware that they were expected to complete the survey.
• The timing of survey may have made completion problematic. • Lack of buy-in.
Building-level leaders are a valuable resource, particularly in a large district like
Pleasant View. Effective strategies and procedures from those buildings with higher
return rates (see Table 1) can be identified and replicated elsewhere in the district.
Recommendations: 2.1 Encourage administrators, department heads, and coordinators to lead by
example. If technology integration, related needs assessments, and staff
development, are viewed as a priority by those in leadership positions, there is
a greater likelihood that other staff will make it a priority as well.
Useful resources are: • The Consortium for School Networking provides resources, information
and programs for school district technology leaders: http://www.cosn.org/
• Publication: Leadership for Web 2.0 in Education: Promise and Reality http://www.cosn.org/Portals/7/docs/Web%202.0/CoSN%20Report%20042809Final%20w-cover.pdf
2.2 Factors that contributed to higher return rates (Table 1) should be identified,
celebrated, and shared.
2.3 Factors that contributed to low return rates should be addressed prior to
distribution of the new survey.
2.4 Provide staff with time to complete the survey during contractual hours (i.e.
faculty meeting, team planning time, etc.). That, coupled with the expectation
that all staff complete the survey, will result in a much clearer picture of needs
that should be addressed.
Professional Development - Planning
“Truly transformational staff development activities are but one piece of a larger change effort initiated by the entire school community.” Holmes & Duffey, p. 4
Discussion:
The district has numerous goals, including those that have been identified: 1)
Preparing graduates with 21st century learning skills, 2) Utilizing the full potential of
technology resources, and 3) Increasing student achievement as measured by
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). To address these and other considerations, a
comprehensive plan is needed. Survey data will assist in the identification of ways in
which technology can be effectively integrated into classrooms and school operations
but is just one of many data points to consider. Technology integration can be an
effective tool in the development of students’ 21st century skills but specific skills need to
be targeted and instructional strategies and methods identified. The act of using
technology in the classroom is not sufficient to ensure that students are developing
needed skills. Technology integration will provide the tools and resources needed to
meet instructional goals but clear direction is needed.
Recommendations: 3.1 Develop a 3-5 year strategic plan that encompasses district goals including
raising of academic achievement, development of 21st century skills, and
effective use of technology resources. Include initial training, follow-up training,
ongoing coaching, mentoring, tech support, and support the plan with human
and fiscal resources needed for implementation.
3.2 Analyze assessment data and target subgroups and content standards that
currently do not meet expectations for AYP. Use that information to plan math-
related staff development activities for appropriate staff. Though the NCLB
goal of 100% meeting expectations by 2014 may be considered unrealistic,
targeting specific subgroups and standards will allow students to make
ongoing progress.
3.3 Clearly identify 21st century skills including standards, benchmarks,
assessment and evaluation. Useful resources include:
• Partnership for 21st Century Learning (http://www.p21.org/) is a national organization that advocates for 21st century readiness and provides information, tools and resources to assist districts and schools.
• Pearson Foundation videos provide a model of 21st century skill development and assessment in the K-12 classroom: http://www.youtube.com/user/PearsonFdtn#p/c/BCB47540BEBC02EC/2/HiyaQ2WbBVU
3.4 Incorporate NETS for students and teachers into district planning. Useful
resources include:
• ISTE NETS Student Profiles: http://www.iste.org/standards/nets-for-students/nets-for-students-2007-profiles.aspx
• ISTE Necessary Conditions: http://www.iste.org/standards/nets-for-students/nets-for-students-essential-conditions.aspx
• NETS Implementation Wiki: http://nets-implementation.iste.wikispaces.net/
3.5 Identify resources that will aid in the successful integration of technology in
district classrooms. Possibilities include:
• Forum Unified Technology Suite: http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2005/tech_suite/
• Technology Integration Matrix: http://fcit.usf.edu/matrix/
Professional Development – Training Sessions
“Since any large-scale change results from the actions of individuals, individuals must be the focus of all change efforts.” Holmes & Duffey, p. 6
Discussion: Pleasant View is a large district and professional development needs are quite
diverse. Though a comprehensive plan is needed, staff development activities can
address needs identified through the Technology Integration Survey.
Recommendations: 4.1 Train-the-Trainer Model: Target school personnel who will act as trainers,
providing just-in-time support as well as lead professional development
training activities.
4.1.1 Coaches: Provide training for Instructional Coaches so that they can
model technology rich lessons that support best practice in content
area instruction. Currently, 76% of Instructional Coaches are at Tier 1.
Plan professional development activities so that all advance to Tier 2
within one year, and to Tier 3 by the end of the second year.
4.1.2 Department Heads: Provide training for department heads and
curriculum leaders so that technology use is embedded in district
curriculum and modeled for district staff. Survey results show that
“Department Head” is the only role in which there are currently no
individuals at Tier 3, so it is expected that training needs will be more
intensive. As above, plan professional development activities so that
all advance to Tier 2 within one year, and to Tier 3 by the end of the
second year.
4.1.3 Technology Leaders: Provide training for elementary teachers who
will act as technology leaders within their buildings. 15 of 23 schools
already have individuals at Tier 3; encourage them to serve in a
building-level technology leadership role. Of the remaining eight
schools, all but one (Maple Elementary) have staff at Tier 2.
4.2 Differentiation: Direct applicability to one’s experience, responsibilities, and
learning style, will help ensure that training is useful and acted upon. It is
recommended that training sessions be limited to software, hardware and
technology resources that participants have direct and ongoing access to.
4.2.1 Administrators: With just four administrators returning surveys it is
difficult to judge needs of all. Focusing training for administrators on
the effective evaluation of technology integration will help them to
identify, encourage, and support effective use of technology by their
staff. Further, training administrators on use of specific productivity,
collaboration, and communication tools will further professional and
school goals while modeling effective use of technology. Those at Tier
3 may serve as mentors.
4.2.2 Library Media Specialists: In many districts, Library Media
Specialists provide direct instruction to students in the areas of
research and computer applications. 67% of district Library Media
Specialists are currently at Tier 1. Plan professional development
activities so that all Library Media Specialists are at Tier 2 within one
year.
4.2.3 Student Services: Student Services Personnel (Social Workers,
School Psychologists, Speech/Language Pathologists, PT/OT) will
benefit training on the use of specific software and hardware that can
be used with students as well as productivity, progress monitoring,
and IEP software. It is recommended that those at Tier 3 (15%) be
questioned about what has been most useful and effective for them
and that input drive content selection for professional development for
the remaining 85%, all of whom are at Tier 1.
4.2.4 Teachers: For those trainings that are more general in nature, like the
use of specific hardware, opportunities to work with grade level and
subject matter peers is beneficial. Allowing time to relate new skills
and understanding to classroom practices will make new learning
more meaningful and improve implementation. Teachers of NCLB
subjects will benefit working as subject matter teams to share
resources, lessons and successes that support achievement
standards. Since all middle school math teachers are at Tier 1, and
the district did not make AYP in math, it is recommended that middle
school math teachers receive more intensive training.
4.2.5 Support Staff: Training for support staff should related directly to the
hardware and software used by students they work with.
4.2.6 Tier 1: 78% of survey respondents are at Tier 1. Within a group this
size it is expected that there are variety of skills sets - some
individuals will be farther along that others. Offering modules/sessions
which teachers can self-select will help ensure that training takes
individuals where they are and moves them forward.
4.2.7 Tier 2: 14% of survey respondents are at Tier 2. Professional
development offerings of sufficient challenge are needed for this
group. It is recommended that individuals submit topics of interest for
training sessions. Information gathered from this group can be used to
guide training of those currently at Tier 1: What has facilitated your
ability to integrate technology? What roadblocks did you find along the
way? What suggestions do you have for professional development?
4.2.8 Tier 3: 8% of survey respondents are at Tier 3. Those at Tier 3 are
technology leaders in the district and providing them opportunities for
collaboration and sharing will build a supportive environment for
continued growth of technology integration in skills. It is
recommended that release time and funding be provided to allow Tier
3 teachers to attend state, regional, and national technology
conferences. As numbers grow within Tier 3 greater in-house
expertise will be needed to continue the train-the-trainer model.
4.2.9 Learning Styles: Training sessions should present information
verbally and in writing, provide support materials for those who need
more time to work and process information, and provide time for
hands-on application for all participants. Building an online library of
training documents and videos, which could be accessed any time,
will allow district staff to work at their own pace.
4.2.10 Site-Based Training: Staff development that is site-based and
promotes collegiality has been found to be most effective (Holmes &
Duffey). Working with smaller groups within buildings - 1:1 when
needed – will provide just-in-time support that relates directly to
classroom instruction. Building-level training can occur as mini-
sessions before school, after school, during team meetings, and by
individual appointment. Gathering information from higher functioning
schools (see Table 2) will help to identify and build upon current
practices that have been successful in the district. Additional training
sessions and sister school mentoring should be planned for those
buildings with few teachers at Tiers 2 and 3:
• Maple Elementary teachers are at Tier 1 only. • Bryant Elementary has no teachers at Tier 2. • Six schools have no teachers at Tier 3: Garfield, Jones,
Lynwood, Prairie, and Wilson elementary schools and West Pleasant View MS.
4.3 Timeline: Large-scale training sessions may be scheduled for Staff
Development/Inservice days as well as evening, weekend, and summer
sessions. Release time training sessions will allow individuals with like roles,
who work in different buildings, to be trained together. Collegial support and
content-specific training will increase the effectiveness of the staff
development activities (Holmes & Duffey).
4.3.1 Initial Training: Target specific learning goals/teaching strategies as
opposed to focusing on the technology itself.
4.3.2 Follow-Up Training: Support efforts to implement training and build
on prior learning.
4.3.3 New Hires: In a district this size it is expected that technology training
will be needed on a yearly basis to teach new hires to use the district
network, access district resources, and use technology hardware and
software that is available in their classrooms and work spaces.
4.3.4 Ongoing Support: Ongoing, building-level support for further training
along with troubleshooting, brainstorming, and modeling of
technology-rich lessons that build 21st century skills and increase
achievement.
4.4 Compensation: It is recommended that the district budget monies for
hardware, software, and release time substitutes to support training goals.
Budget monies should also be allocated to compensate staff members who
attend training sessions outside of contractual hours. Compensation, in the
form of stipends, release time, and adjustments to teaching responsibilities
may also be made for identified mentors and other technology leaders. Also,
offering training courses with Continuing Education/CPDU credit will provide
added incentive for teachers.
4.5 Evaluation: As specific training sessions and materials are development, a
system for evaluating their effectiveness should be put into place. Ongoing
evaluation will allow for continuous improvement and effective use of training
resources. In evaluating how well technology resources are being utilized in
district classrooms, it is important for administrators, teachers, staff and school
board members alike, to be aware that “time requirements are an unusually
salient factor when technology is the focus of staff development. It takes
longer for technology to become a part of classroom practice than other
innovations – two to three years” (Holmes & Duffey, p. 18).
References Holmes, K., & Duffey, D. (1993). Technology staff development: Designing an effective
process. Denton, TX: Texas Center for Educational Technology. Retrieved from http://www.tcet.unt.edu/pubs/staff/
Image Credit LCD Monitor: http://www.clker.com/cliparts/4/1/e/6/11949838211786721468lcd_monitor_the_structor_.svg.hi.png
Appendix A: Technology Integration Tiers
Tiers of Technology Integration into the Classroom Indicators
Tier 1: Teacher Focus on
Productivity Tier 2: Instructional Presentation
and Student Productivity Tier 3: Powerful Student-Centered 21st Century
Learning Environment
This tier focuses on the teacher using
technology to get their job done.
This tier involves teacher facilitation of large group learning activities and student productivity use of
technology.
This tier promotes students to be actively engaged in using technology in individual and collaborative learning
activities. Observable Indicators
Teachers: • Locate standards using electronic
tools to align lessons (e.g., use the online Grade-Level Resources site and locate EALRs/GLEs on OSPI website)
• Find instructional resources on the Internet (e.g., find lesson resources at Marco Polo, district, or state websites)
• Produce, store, and retrieve learning materials electronically (e.g., create lesson plans in Word and store them on file server, create and print handouts for students that can be saved and modified in future years)
• Keep/organize student information, grades more effectively (e.g., use electronic gradebook, extract achievement data from student information system, graph student progress using Excel)
• Communicate information to parents and students via web or e-mail (e.g., post upcoming events or assignments on school webpage)
• Communicate quickly with e-mail (e.g., respond to e-mail from parents, learn about school meetings and events via internal e-mail)
Teachers: • Conduct one-computer classroom lessons (e.g.,
use software such as Decisions, Decisions and Timeliner by Tom Snyder, lead virtual field trips to museums using K-20 Network)
• Deliver presentations with graphics and sound (e.g., teachers use software such as PowerPoint, Keynote, or audio production software)
• Lead students in brainstorming and sharing ideas (e.g., teachers use word processing programs or software such as Inspiration, use Intel Visual Ranking website)
• Represent information visually (e.g., teachers create graphs in Excel or with a graphing calculator to visually represent chemical interactions)
• Facilitate group discussions and lessons (e.g., teachers use interactive whiteboards, LCD projectors, student response systems)
• Have students write papers and reports on assigned topics using computers or “smart keyboards” such as AlphaSmarts (e.g., require that all student papers must be word-processed)
• Create scaffolding for student projects (e.g., teachers provide students with writing prompts or project templates)
• Facilitate students using technology for assessment (e.g., teachers use online quizzes or diagnostic tools, graph and analyze progress with class using Excel)
• Interactively communicate with parents and students (e.g., teachers initiate and respond to e-mail, conduct on-line surveys, interact through website)
Teachers enable students to: • Create and use online resources to facilitate inquiry
(e.g., students create and use online resources such as WebQuests)
• Engage in inquiry-based projects driven by essential questions (e.g., students create major research projects such as Big 6 essential question projects)
• Direct their own use of technology (e.g., students stay current with new information through tools such as RSS feeds)
• Research, analyze data and problem-solve in a global context (e.g., student engage in projects such as ThinkQuest with classrooms in other states or countries)
• Engage in individual or collaborative project-based learning (e.g., students engage in real-world projects and problem-solving using email or websites)
• Use modeling and simulations (e.g., students conduct simulations using online resources)
• Write, develop and publish individual and collaborative products (e.g., students publish projects online to be reviewed by parents or peers)
• Invent products through programming or production (e.g., students produce how-to videos or movies to share with others)
• Create scaffolding for their own projects (e.g., students create writing prompts or project templates)
• Are involved with their parents and teachers in the analysis of student data and meeting standards, or participate in developing their own learning plans (e.g., students use classroom-based assessments and assess their own work)
• Initiate communication with parents, teachers, community members, or other students (e.g., students display self-directed communication through tools such as weblogs)
Appendix B: Revised Excel Spreadsheet Data
1
AN AO AP AQ AR AS AT AU AV
Tier Type Role 1 Role 2Grade/Subject 1
Grade/Subject 2
Grade/Subject 3 School
520521522523524525526527528529530531532533534535536537538539540541542543544
Tech Integration TierTier 1: 397 77.8%Tier 2: 71 13.9%Tier 3: 42 8.2%
TOTAL: 510 100.0%
School TypeElementary: 205 40.2%
Middle School: 69 13.5%High School: 215 42.2%Hunt Center: 21 4.1%
TOTAL: 510 100.0%
Primary RoleAdministrator: 4 0.8%
Coach: 21 4.1%Coordinator: 2 0.4%Dept. Head: 6 1.2%
Interentionist: 8 1.6%LMS: 15 2.9%
Student Services: 20 3.9%Support Staff: 2 0.4%
Teacher: 418 82.0%(no title): 14 2.7%TOTAL: 510 100.0%
12345
678910111213141516171819202122
232425
26
27
28
AN AO AP AQ AR AS AT AU AV
Tier Type Role 1 Role 2Grade/Subject 1
Grade/Subject 2
Grade/Subject 3 School
Tier 1 ELEM Teacher 1st Grade Adams Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 1st Grade Adams Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 3rd Grade Adams Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 6th Grade Adams Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEMStudent Services
Physical Therapist Adams Elementary School
Tier 2 ELEM Teacher Adams Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher Adams Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher Adams Elementary SchoolTier 2 ELEM Teacher Adams Elementary SchoolTier 3 ELEM Teacher Adams Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher Adams Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 5th Grade Adams Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 5th Grade Adams Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM (no title) Adams Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 5th Grade Adams Elementary School Tier 1 ELEM Teacher 1st Grade Apple Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 2/3 teacher Apple Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 2nd Grade Apple Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 3rd Grade Apple Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 5th Grade Apple Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher Art Apple Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEMStudent Services
Guidance Counselor Apple Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM Teacher 4th Grade Apple Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 4th Grade Apple Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM Coach
Instructional Coach, Literacy Apple Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM Coach
Instructional Coach, Literacy, Primary
Instructional Coach, Math, Primary Apple Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM TeacherSPED Resource Apple Elementary School
1
AN AO AP AQ AR AS AT AU AV
Tier Type Role 1 Role 2Grade/Subject 1
Grade/Subject 2
Grade/Subject 3 School
2930313233343536373839
40
414243
4445464748495051525354
55565758
Tier 1 ELEM TeacherSPED Resource Apple Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM Teacher Apple Elementary SchoolTier 2 ELEM Teacher Apple Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher Apple Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 1st Grade Apple Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 2nd Grade Apple Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 2nd Grade Apple Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 4th Grade Apple Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 2nd Grade Apple Elementary School Tier 3 ELEM Teacher 6th Grade Apple Elementary School Tier 1 ELEM Teacher 6th Grade Apple Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM LMSLibrary Media Specialist Apple Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM CoachInstructional Coach, Math Brown Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM Teacher 2nd Grade Brown Elementary SchoolTier 3 ELEM Teacher 4th Grade Brown Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM LMSLibrary Media Specialist Brown Elementary School
Tier 3 ELEM Teacher Brown Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 1st Grade Brown Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 3rd Grade Brown Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 3rd Grade Brown Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 3rd Grade Brown Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 4th Grade Brown Elementary SchoolTier 3 ELEM Teacher 6th Grade Brown Elementary SchoolTier 2 ELEM (no title) Brown Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 5th Grade Brown Elementary School Tier 1 ELEM Teacher 4th Grade Brown Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM TeacherSPED Preschool Bryant Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM Teacher Bryant Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher Bryant Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 3rd Grade Bryant Elementary School
1
AN AO AP AQ AR AS AT AU AV
Tier Type Role 1 Role 2Grade/Subject 1
Grade/Subject 2
Grade/Subject 3 School
596061626364656667
68
69
70
71
72
7374
757677
78
79808182
Tier 1 ELEM Teacher 4th Grade Bryant Elementary SchoolTier 3 ELEM (no title) Bryant Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 1st Grade Bryant Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher Music Bryant Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher Bryant Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 6th Grade Bryant Elementary SchoolTier 2 ELEM Teacher 6th Grade Cherry Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher Career Focus Cherry Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher Kindergarten Cherry Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM TeacherSPED Resource K-6 Cherry Elementary School
Tier 2 ELEM LMSLibrary Media Specialist Cherry Elementary School
Tier 3 ELEM CoachInstructional Coach, Math Cherry Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEMAdministrator Principal Cherry Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM CoachInterventionist
Instructional Coach
Reading Recovery Cherry Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM TeacherSPED Resource Cherry Elementary School
Tier 3 ELEM Teacher Cherry Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM TeacherSupport Staff Title I Cherry Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM (no title) Cherry Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 2/3 Grade Cherry Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM Coach
Instructional Coach, Literacy, Primary Cherry Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEMInterventionist
Title I Reading Recovery Cherry Elementary School
Tier 1 MS Teacher East Pleasant View Middle SchoolTier 1 MS Teacher East Pleasant View Middle SchoolTier 1 MS Teacher East Pleasant View Middle School
1
AN AO AP AQ AR AS AT AU AV
Tier Type Role 1 Role 2Grade/Subject 1
Grade/Subject 2
Grade/Subject 3 School
83
84
8586
87
88
89
9091
929394959697
98
99
100
101102
Tier 1 MS Teacher East Pleasant View Middle School
Tier 1 MSCoordinator Teacher Fitness Health
Activities Coordinator East Pleasant View Middle School
Tier 2 MS Coach
Instructional Coach, Literacy East Pleasant View Middle School
Tier 3 MS Teacher Technology East Pleasant View Middle School
Tier 1 MS LMSLibrary Media Specialist East Pleasant View Middle School
Tier 1 MS TeacherSPED Life Skills Fitness East Pleasant View Middle School
Tier 1 ELEMStudent Services
Guidance Counselor Evergreen Elementary School
Tier 3 ELEM LMSLibrary Media Specialist Evergreen Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM Teacher SPED Evergreen Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEMStudent Services
Speech Language Pathologist Evergreen Elementary School
Tier 2 ELEM Teacher Evergreen Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher Evergreen Elementary SchoolTier 2 ELEM Teacher 3rd Grade Evergreen Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher Music Evergreen Elementary SchoolTier 2 ELEM Teacher 5th Grade Evergreen Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEMInterventionist
SPED Behavioral Interventionist Evergreen Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM Coach
Instructional Coach, Literacy Evergreen Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM TeacherMontessori, Intermediate Evergreen Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM TeacherMontessori, Primary Evergreen Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM Teacher Evergreen Elementary School
1
AN AO AP AQ AR AS AT AU AV
Tier Type Role 1 Role 2Grade/Subject 1
Grade/Subject 2
Grade/Subject 3 School
103104105106107
108109
110
111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130
131
Tier 1 ELEM Teacher Evergreen Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 6th Grade Evergreen Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher Evergreen Elementary SchoolTier 3 ELEM Teacher Evergreen Elementary SchoolTier 2 ELEM Teacher 4th Grade Evergreen Elementary School
Tier 2 HS TeacherSocial Studies, History Franklin High School
Tier 1 HS Teacher Fitness Health Franklin High School
Tier 1 HSInterventionist
SPED Behavioral Interventionist Franklin High School
Tier 1 HSStudent Services
Guidance Counselor Franklin High School
Tier 1 HS Teacher Fitness Health Franklin High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Math Franklin High SchoolTier 2 HS Teacher Science Franklin High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Franklin High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Franklin High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Franklin High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Franklin High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Franklin High SchoolTier 2 HS Teacher Franklin High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Franklin High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Franklin High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Franklin High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Franklin High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Franklin High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Franklin High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Franklin High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Franklin High SchoolTier 2 HS Teacher Franklin High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Franklin High School
Tier 1 HS LMSLibrary Media Specialist Franklin High School
1
AN AO AP AQ AR AS AT AU AV
Tier Type Role 1 Role 2Grade/Subject 1
Grade/Subject 2
Grade/Subject 3 School
132133
134135136137138
139140
141142143144145146147148149
150151152153
154155156157158
Tier 1 HS (no title) Franklin High SchoolTier 3 HS (no title) Franklin High School
Tier 1 HS CoachInstructional Coach Franklin High School
Tier 1 HS Teacher English Franklin High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Math Franklin High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Reading Franklin High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher SPED Franklin High School
Tier 2 HS TeacherCTE - Applied Technology
CTE - Business Education Franklin High School
Tier 1 HS Teacher Science, 9/10 Franklin High School
Tier 1 HSDepartment Head Teacher Social Studies Franklin High School
Tier 1 HS Teacher Social Studies Franklin High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher SPED Franklin High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher CTE Fitness Franklin High SchoolTier 2 HS Teacher English Franklin High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher English Franklin High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher English GPS Franklin High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Math Franklin High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Art Franklin High School
Tier 1 ELEM Teacher3rd Grade Teacher Garfield Elementary School
Tier 2 ELEM (no title) Garfield Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM (no title) Garfield Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher Kindergarten Garfield Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM Teacher KindergartenReading Recovery Garfield Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM Teacher Garfield Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher Garfield Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM (no title) Garfield Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 5th Grade Garfield Elementary School
1
AN AO AP AQ AR AS AT AU AV
Tier Type Role 1 Role 2Grade/Subject 1
Grade/Subject 2
Grade/Subject 3 School
159
160161162163164
165166167
168169170
171172173174175176177178179180181182
183
Tier 1 ELEM TeacherMusic, Developmental Garfield Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM Coach
Instructional Coach, Literacy Garfield Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM Teacher SPED MHOH Garfield Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 5/6 Grade Garfield Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 2/3 Grade Garfield Elementary SchoolTier 2 ELEM Teacher Garfield Elementary School
Tier 1 Teacher
SPED MHOH Developmentally Impaired Hunt Center
Tier 1 Teacher 3rd Grade Hunt CenterTier 3 Teacher Art Hunt Center
Tier 1Student Services
Guidance Counselor Hunt Center
Tier 1 Teacher ELL - ELD Hunt CenterTier 1 (no title) Hunt Center
Tier 2Administrator Principal Hunt Center
Tier 1 Teacher Hunt CenterTier 3 Teacher Hunt CenterTier 1 Teacher Hunt CenterTier 1 Teacher Hunt CenterTier 3 Teacher Hunt CenterTier 2 Teacher Hunt CenterTier 1 Teacher Hunt CenterTier 1 Teacher Hunt CenterTier 1 Teacher Grade 2 Hunt CenterTier 3 Teacher Tessera Hunt CenterTier 1 Teacher 6th Grade Hunt Center
Tier 1 Teacher
SPED Developmentally Impaired Hunt Center
1
AN AO AP AQ AR AS AT AU AV
Tier Type Role 1 Role 2Grade/Subject 1
Grade/Subject 2
Grade/Subject 3 School
184185
186
187188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196197198199200201202203204205206207
Tier 1 Teacher Science Hunt CenterTier 2 Teacher Hunt Center
Tier 1 HS TeacherLanguage Arts, 7 (?) Huntington High School
Tier 1 HSStudent Services
Guidance Counselor Huntington High School
Tier 1 HS Teacher Huntington High School
Tier 3 HSStudent Services
Guidance Coordinator Huntington High School
Tier 1 HS TeacherHealth Sciences Huntington High School
Tier 1 HSInterventionist
Intervention Specialist Huntington High School
Tier 1 HS Teacher AssistantKeyboarding Teacher Math Assistant Huntington High School
Tier 3 HS TeacherCTE - Marketing Huntington High School
Tier 1 HSStudent Services
Occupational Therapist, Itinerant Huntington High School
Tier 1 HSStudent Services
Physical Therapist Huntington High School
Tier 1 HSStudent Services
School Psychologist Huntington High School
Tier 2 HS Teacher Science Huntington High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Huntington High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Huntington High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Huntington High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Huntington High SchoolTier 3 HS Teacher Huntington High SchoolTier 2 HS Teacher Huntington High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Huntington High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Huntington High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Huntington High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Huntington High School
1
AN AO AP AQ AR AS AT AU AV
Tier Type Role 1 Role 2Grade/Subject 1
Grade/Subject 2
Grade/Subject 3 School
208209210
211
212
213
214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235
Tier 1 HS Teacher Huntington High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Huntington High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Huntington High School
Tier 1 HS TeacherHumanities, 11/12 Huntington High School
Tier 1 HSInterventionist
SPED Behavioral Interventionist, Intermediate Huntington High School
Tier 1 HS LMSLearning Media Specialist Huntington High School
Tier 1 HS Coach TeacherInstructional Coach World History Huntington High School
Tier 1 HS Teacher Huntington High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Huntington High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Huntington High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Huntington High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Huntington High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Huntington High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Huntington High SchoolTier 2 HS Teacher Huntington High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Huntington High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Huntington High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Huntington High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Huntington High SchoolTier 2 HS Teacher Huntington High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Huntington High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Huntington High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Huntington High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Huntington High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Huntington High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Huntington High SchoolTier 2 HS Teacher Huntington High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Huntington High School
1
AN AO AP AQ AR AS AT AU AV
Tier Type Role 1 Role 2Grade/Subject 1
Grade/Subject 2
Grade/Subject 3 School
236237238239240
241242
243
244245246247248249250251252253
254255256
257258259
260261
Tier 1 HS Teacher Huntington High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Huntington High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Huntington High SchoolTier 3 HS Teacher Huntington High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Huntington High School
Tier 3 HSAdministrator
Assistant Principal Huntington High School
Tier 1 HS Teacher Fitness Huntington High School
Tier 1 HS TeacherContract Based Education Huntington High School
Tier 2 HSDepartment Head Teacher SPED Huntington High School
Tier 2 HS Teacher Science Huntington High School Tier 2 HS Teacher Science Huntington High School Tier 1 ELEM Teacher 5th Grade Jones Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 2nd Grade Jones Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 4th Grade Jones Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 4th Grade Jones Elementary SchoolTier 2 ELEM Teacher 5th Grade Jones Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher Fitness Health Jones Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher SPED, K-4 Jones Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM Coach
Instructional Coach, Literacy Jones Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM Teacher 2nd Grade Jones Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher sp Teacher Jones Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEMStudent Services
Speech Language Pathologist Jones Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM Teacher Jones Elementary SchoolTier 2 ELEM Teacher 4/5 Grade Jones Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEMSupport Staff
Title I Math, Primary Jones Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM Teacher 3rd Grade Jones Elementary School
1
AN AO AP AQ AR AS AT AU AV
Tier Type Role 1 Role 2Grade/Subject 1
Grade/Subject 2
Grade/Subject 3 School
262
263
264
265266267
268
269
270
271
272
273274275
276277
278279280
Tier 1 ELEMSupport Staff
Early Childhood Jones Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM LMSLearning Media Specialist Jones Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM LMSLearning Media Specialist Jones Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM TeacherSPED Resource 4-6 Jones Elementary School
Tier 2 ELEM Teacher Jones Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 2nd Grade Jones Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM TeacherSPED Preschool Jones Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEMStudent Services
Speech Language Pathologist Jones Elementary School
Tier 1 MS Teacher1st Grade? (MS listed) Lincoln Middle School
Tier 1 MS Teacher1st Grade? (MS listed) Lincoln Middle School
Tier 1 MS Teacher4th Grade? (MS listed) Lincoln Middle School
Tier 1 MS Teacher4th Grade? (MS listed) Lincoln Middle School
Tier 2 MS Teacher Humanities Lincoln Middle SchoolTier 1 MS Teacher English History Lincoln Middle School
Tier 1 MS Teacher
Music - Instrumental Music Lincoln Middle School
Tier 1 MS Teacher Lincoln Middle School
Tier 1 MS TeacherMath Numeracy Lincoln Middle School
Tier 3 MS Teacher Lincoln Middle SchoolTier 1 MS Teacher Lincoln Middle School
1
AN AO AP AQ AR AS AT AU AV
Tier Type Role 1 Role 2Grade/Subject 1
Grade/Subject 2
Grade/Subject 3 School
281282283284285
286287288
289290291292293294295296297298299300301302
303304305306307308309310311312
Tier 1 MS Teacher Lincoln Middle SchoolTier 1 MS Teacher Lincoln Middle SchoolTier 3 MS Teacher Lincoln Middle SchoolTier 1 MS Teacher Lincoln Middle SchoolTier 2 MS Teacher Lincoln Middle School
Tier 1 MS Teacher2nd Grade? (MS listed) Lincoln Middle School
Tier 1 MS Teacher Lincoln Middle SchoolTier 1 MS Teacher Lincoln Middle School
Tier 1 MS TeacherSPED Life Skills Lincoln Middle School
Tier 1 ELEM Teacher 6th Grade Lynwood Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher Kindergarten Lynwood Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher Lynwood Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher Lynwood Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher Fitness Health Lynwood Elementary SchoolTier 2 ELEM Teacher Lynwood Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher Lynwood Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 1st/2nd Grade Lynwood Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 1st Grade Lynwood Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 2nd/3rd Grade Lynwood Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 6th Grade Lynwood Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 6th Grade Lynwood Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 6th Grade Lynwood Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM TeacherSPED ADAPT (Autism) Lynwood Elementary School
Tier 2 ELEM Teacher ELL/ELD Lynwood Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher Kindergarten Lynwood Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher Music Lynwood Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 2nd Grade Lynwood Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 2nd Grade Lynwood Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher Lynwood Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 2nd Grade Lynwood Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 4th Grade Lynwood Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 5th Grade Lynwood Elementary School
1
AN AO AP AQ AR AS AT AU AV
Tier Type Role 1 Role 2Grade/Subject 1
Grade/Subject 2
Grade/Subject 3 School
313314315
316317318
319
320321322
323324
325326327328329330331332333334335336337
Tier 1 ELEM TeacherSPED Resource Lynwood Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM Teacher 3rd Grade Maple Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 6th Grade Maple Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM CoachInstructional Coach Maple Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM Teacher Kindergarten Maple Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher Montessori Maple Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM TeacherSPED Resource Maple Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM Teacher
SPED Developmentally Impaired Maple Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM Teacher Maple Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 1st Grade Maple Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM LMSLearning Media Specialist Maple Elementary School
Tier 1 HS Teacher English Mountain View High School
Tier 1 HS Teacher AdvisorCTE - Marketing
DECA Advisor (marketing organization for students) Mountain View High School
Tier 1 HS Teacher Math Mountain View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Music Mountain View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Mountain View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Mountain View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Mountain View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Mountain View High SchoolTier 2 HS Teacher ELL - ESL Mountain View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Mountain View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Mountain View High SchoolTier 3 HS Teacher Mountain View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Mountain View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Mountain View High School
1
AN AO AP AQ AR AS AT AU AV
Tier Type Role 1 Role 2Grade/Subject 1
Grade/Subject 2
Grade/Subject 3 School
338339340341342343344345346347348
349350
351
352
353354355356
357358
359360361362
Tier 1 HS Teacher Mountain View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Mountain View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Mountain View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Mountain View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Mountain View High SchoolTier 3 HS Teacher Mountain View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Mountain View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Mountain View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Mountain View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Mountain View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Math Mountain View High School
Tier 2 HS Teacher
SPED Developmentally Impaired Mountain View High School
Tier 1 HS Teacher Math Mountain View High School
Tier 1 HS TeacherMusic - Choral Music Newport High School
Tier 1 HSStudent Services
Guidance Counselor Newport High School
Tier 3 HSStudent Services
Guidance Counselor Newport High School
Tier 1 HS Teacher ELL - ELD Newport High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher English Newport High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher English Newport High School
Tier 1 HSStudent Services
Guidance Counselor Newport High School
Tier 2 HS Teacher Health Newport High School
Tier 2 HS Coach
Instructional Coach, Literacy Newport High School
Tier 1 HS Teacher Math Newport High SchoolTier 3 HS Teacher Math Newport High SchoolTier 3 HS Teacher Math Newport High School
1
AN AO AP AQ AR AS AT AU AV
Tier Type Role 1 Role 2Grade/Subject 1
Grade/Subject 2
Grade/Subject 3 School
363364
365366367368369370371372373374375376377378379
380
381
382383384385386
387388
Tier 2 HS Teacher Math
SVL (Spokane Virtual Learning?) Newport High School
Tier 2 HS Teacher Newport High School
Tier 2 HS TeacherSPED Resource Newport High School
Tier 1 HS Teacher Newport High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Newport High SchoolTier 3 HS Teacher Newport High SchoolTier 3 HS Teacher Newport High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Newport High SchoolTier 3 HS Teacher Newport High SchoolTier 3 HS Teacher Newport High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Newport High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Newport High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Newport High SchoolTier 2 HS Teacher Newport High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Newport High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Newport High SchoolTier 2 HS Teacher Math Newport High School
Tier 2 HSDepartment Head Teacher Newport High School
Tier 1 HSDepartment Head Teacher
Music - Choral Music Newport High School
Tier 3 HS Teacher
World Languages, French Newport High School
Tier 1 HS Teacher Math Newport High School Tier 1 HS Teacher Art Newport High School Tier 1 HS Teacher Social Studies Newport High School Tier 1 HS Teacher SPED Newport High School
Tier 1 HSStudent Services
Guidance Counselor Newport High School
Tier 2 HS Teacher CTE Newport High School
1
AN AO AP AQ AR AS AT AU AV
Tier Type Role 1 Role 2Grade/Subject 1
Grade/Subject 2
Grade/Subject 3 School
389390391392
393394
395
396
397398399400401402
403
404
405406407408
409
Tier 3 HS Teacher
CTE - Family & Consumer Sciences Newport High School
Tier 2 HS Teacher English Newport High School Tier 1 HS Teacher English History Newport High School Tier 1 HS Teacher Math Newport High School
Tier 1 HS TeacherDirector of Music
Music - Director of Music Newport High School
Tier 1 HS Teacher Science Newport High School
Tier 1 HS TeacherCriminal Justice Pleasant View High School
Tier 2 HSCoordinator Teacher CTE
Career Focus Coordinator Pleasant View High School
Tier 2 HSDepartment Head Teacher Pleasant View High School
Tier 1 HS Teacher English Pleasant View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher English Social Studies Pleasant View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Fitness Health Pleasant View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Fitness Pleasant View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Pleasant View High School
Tier 2 HS Teacher CTE - Graphics Pleasant View High School
Tier 1 HS LMSLearning Media Specialist Pleasant View High School
Tier 3 HS CoachInstructional Coach Social Studies Pleasant View High School
Tier 2 HS Teacher Math Pleasant View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Math Pleasant View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Fitness Pleasant View High School
Tier 1 HS Teacher
World Languages, Spanish Pleasant View High School
1
AN AO AP AQ AR AS AT AU AV
Tier Type Role 1 Role 2Grade/Subject 1
Grade/Subject 2
Grade/Subject 3 School
410411412413414415416417418419420421422423424
425426427428429430431432433434
435436
437438
Tier 1 HSStudent Services
Speech Language Pathologist Pleasant View High School
Tier 1 HS Teacher Pleasant View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Pleasant View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Pleasant View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Pleasant View High SchoolTier 2 HS Teacher Pleasant View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Pleasant View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Pleasant View High SchoolTier 3 HS Teacher Pleasant View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Pleasant View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Pleasant View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Pleasant View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Pleasant View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Pleasant View High SchoolTier 3 HS Teacher Pleasant View High School
Tier 2 HS Teacher English
World Languages, German Pleasant View High School
Tier 3 HS Teacher Pleasant View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Pleasant View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Pleasant View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Pleasant View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Pleasant View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Pleasant View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Pleasant View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Pleasant View High SchoolTier 1 HS Teacher Pleasant View High School
Tier 1 HSDepartment Head Teacher Pleasant View High School
Tier 1 ELEM Teacher 6th Grade Prairie Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM TeacherSPED ADAPT (Autism) Prairie Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM Teacher ELL - ELD Prairie Elementary School
1
AN AO AP AQ AR AS AT AU AV
Tier Type Role 1 Role 2Grade/Subject 1
Grade/Subject 2
Grade/Subject 3 School
439
440441442443444
445446447448
449
450
451452453454455
456457
458459
Tier 1 ELEM Teacher Art Prairie Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEMStudent Services
Speech Language Pathologist Prairie Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM Teacher Prairie Elementary SchoolTier 2 ELEM Teacher Prairie Elementary SchoolTier 2 ELEM Teacher Prairie Elementary SchoolTier 2 ELEM Teacher Prairie Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM Teacher
Music - Developmental Music Prairie Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM Teacher 3rd Grade Sandburg Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 6th Grade Sandburg Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher Sandburg Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM Teacher
Music - Developmental Music K-6 Sandburg Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM Teacher
Music - Developmental Music K-6 Sandburg Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEMInterventionist
SPED Behavioral Interventionist Sandburg Elementary School
Tier 1 ELEM Teacher Kindergarten Sandburg Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher Sandburg Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher Sandburg Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 2nd Grade Sandburg Elementary School
Tier 2 ELEM LMSLearning Media Specialist Sandburg Elementary School
Tier 2 ELEM Teacher 6th Grade Sandburg Elementary School
Tier 3 ELEM LMSLearning Media Specialist Sandburg Elementary School
Tier 2 MS Teacher Science Washington Middle School
1
AN AO AP AQ AR AS AT AU AV
Tier Type Role 1 Role 2Grade/Subject 1
Grade/Subject 2
Grade/Subject 3 School
460
461
462
463
464
465
466467468
469470
471
472473474475476477478
479
Tier 1 MS Teacher Art Washington Middle School
Tier 1 MS Teacher
Music - Instrumental Music Washington Middle School
Tier 2 MSInterventionist Teacher
SPED Behavioral Interventionist FSC Washington Middle School
Tier 3 MSStudent Services
Guidance Counselor Washington Middle School
Tier 1 MS CoachInstructional Coach Washington Middle School
Tier 1 MS CoachInstructional Coach Washington Middle School
Tier 3 MSInterventionist
SPED Interventionist Washington Middle School
Tier 2 MS Teacher Language Arts Washington Middle SchoolTier 1 MS Teacher Math Washington Middle School
Tier 2 MS Coach
Instructional Coach - Science Washington Middle School
Tier 1 MS Teacher SPED Washington Middle School
Tier 1 MS Teacher SPED ScienceSPED Social Studies Washington Middle School
Tier 1 MS TeacherSPED Language Arts Washington Middle School
Tier 1 MS Teacher Washington Middle SchoolTier 1 MS Teacher Washington Middle SchoolTier 1 MS Teacher Washington Middle SchoolTier 1 MS Teacher Washington Middle SchoolTier 3 MS Teacher Washington Middle SchoolTier 1 MS Teacher Math 8 Washington Middle School
Tier 1 MS CoachInstructional Coach Washington Middle School
1
AN AO AP AQ AR AS AT AU AV
Tier Type Role 1 Role 2Grade/Subject 1
Grade/Subject 2
Grade/Subject 3 School
480481482
483
484485486487488489490
491
492493494495496497
498499500501502503504
505
Tier 2 MS LMSLearning Media Specialist Washington Middle School
Tier 1 MS (no title) Washington Middle SchoolTier 2 MS Teacher Humanities West Pleasant View Middle School
Tier 1 MS CoachInstructional Coach West Pleasant View Middle School
Tier 1 MS CoachInstructional Coach West Pleasant View Middle School
Tier 1 MS Teacher Math West Pleasant View Middle SchoolTier 1 MS Teacher Science West Pleasant View Middle SchoolTier 1 MS Teacher West Pleasant View Middle SchoolTier 2 MS Teacher West Pleasant View Middle SchoolTier 1 MS Teacher West Pleasant View Middle SchoolTier 1 MS Teacher Math 7 West Pleasant View Middle School
Tier 1 MS LMSLearning Media Specialist West Pleasant View Middle School
Tier 1 MS TeacherSPED Resource West Pleasant View Middle School
Tier 2 MS Teacher Science 7/8 West Pleasant View Middle School Tier 1 MS Teacher Science West Pleasant View Middle School Tier 1 MS (no title) West Pleasant View Middle School Tier 1 MS Teacher Art West Pleasant View Middle School Tier 1 MS Teacher Humanities West Pleasant View Middle School
Tier 1 MS TeacherSPED Life Skills West Pleasant View Middle School
Tier 1 ELEM Teacher 2nd Grade Wilson Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 3rd Grade Wilson Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 6th Grade Wilson Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 1st Grade Wilson Elementary SchoolTier 2 ELEM Teacher 4th Grade Wilson Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher Music Wilson Elementary School
Tier 2 ELEMAdministrator Principal Wilson Elementary School
1
AN AO AP AQ AR AS AT AU AV
Tier Type Role 1 Role 2Grade/Subject 1
Grade/Subject 2
Grade/Subject 3 School
506507508509510511512
513
514
515
516
517518519
Tier 1 ELEM Teacher SPED Wilson Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher Wilson Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher Wilson Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM Teacher 6th Grade Wilson Elementary SchoolTier 2 ELEM (no title) Wilson Elementary SchoolTier 1 ELEM (no title) Wilson Elementary School
MHOH = Mulitply Handicapped/Orthopedically HandicappedSPED = Special EducationDI = Developmentally ImpairedELL/ELD = English Language Learners, English Language DevelopmentCTE = Career/Technical Education
top related