Transcript
8/6/2019 48015237 Job Evaluation
1/20
JOB EVALUATIONJOB EVALUATION
BY:NEELAM YADAV
8/6/2019 48015237 Job Evaluation
2/20
8/6/2019 48015237 Job Evaluation
3/20
Job EvaluationJob Evaluation
The evaluation is based on a combination of job content, skillsrequired, value to the organization, organizational culture, and
the external market.
This potential to blend internal forces and external marketforces is both a strength and a challenge to job evaluation.
8/6/2019 48015237 Job Evaluation
4/20
Fe atur es of JobFe atur es of Job
EvaluationEvaluationIt tries t o assess j ob s, no tpe ople .
The sta nd ar ds of job evaluati on are relative, no t a bs olute .
The basic i nfo rmati on on which job evaluati on s are ma de is
ob taine d f r om job a nalysis .
8/6/2019 48015237 Job Evaluation
5/20
Fe atur es of JobFe atur es of JobEvaluationEvaluation
Job evaluati on s are carrie d out by gr oups, no t byind ividuals .
Job evaluati on do es no t f ix pay scales, but merelypr ovides a basis for evaluati ng a rati on al wa gestructure .
8/6/2019 48015237 Job Evaluation
6/20
B e n e fit s of job e valuationB e n e fit s of job e valuation
It tries t o link pay with the requireme nts of the j ob.
It off ers a systematic pr oce dure for determi ning therelative w orth of job s .
An equita ble wa ge structure is a natural outc ome of job evaluati on
An unb iase d job evaluati on te nd s t o elimi nate salaryinequalities by placi ng job s havi ng similar requireme ntsin the same salary ra ng e .
8/6/2019 48015237 Job Evaluation
7/20
B e n e fit s of job e valuationB e n e fit s of job e valuation
Empl oyees as well as u nion s participate asmem bers of job evaluati on committee .
Job evaluati on , whe n cond ucte d pr operly a nd withcare, helps i n the evaluati on of new j ob s .
It p oints out p ossi bilities of more appr opriate use of the pla nts labo r force by ind icati ng job s that nee d more or less s killed wor kers tha n those wh o arema nn ing these j ob s curre ntly.
8/6/2019 48015237 Job Evaluation
8/20
JOB EVALUATIONJOB EVALUATIONMETHODSMETHODS
1- R ANK ING ME THO D
2 -C LASS IFIC ATION ME THO D
3 -P OINT METHO D
4 -F AC TO R C OMP AR IS ON ME THO D
8/6/2019 48015237 Job Evaluation
9/20
R ANKING METHODR ANKING METHOD
It is the simplest meth od of job evaluati on.
In this meth od , job s are arra ng e d f r om hi ghest t o lowest,in or der of their value or merit t o the or ga nizati on.
Job s ca n als o be arra ng e d acc or ding to the relativediff iculty i n per forming them .
Job s are usually ra nk e d in each departme nt a nd the n thedepartme nt ra nk ing s are c ombine d to devel op a n or ga nizati on al ra nk ing.
8/6/2019 48015237 Job Evaluation
10/20
Table: Array of Jobs according to the Ranking Method R a nk Mon thly salaries1 . Acc ounta nt R s 3,000
2. Acc ounts cler k R s 1 ,8003. P urchase assista nt R s 1 ,7004. Machi ne -operat or R s 1 ,4005. Typist R s 900
6. Off ice bo y R s 600
ORG434:AdvancedHRM 10
8/6/2019 48015237 Job Evaluation
11/20
Acc or ding to this meth od , a pre determi ne d num ber of job gr oups or job classes are esta blishe d a nd job s areassi gn e d to these classi f icati on s .
This meth od places gr oups of job s i nto job classes or job gra des .
Separate classes may i nclu de off ice, clerical, ma na gerial,pers onn el, etc .
JOB CLASSIFICATION
8/6/2019 48015237 Job Evaluation
12/20
Following is a brie f descripti on of classi f icati on in a n off ice:C lass 1- Executives: Off ice ma na ger, deputy off icema na ger, departme nt supervis or, etc .
C lass 2 - S killed wor kers: P urchasi ng assista nt, cashier,receipts cler k, etc .
C lass 3 - Semis killed wor kers: Ste no typists, machi neoperat ors, switch bo ar d operat or, etc .
C lass 4 - Semis killed wor kers: f ile cler ks, off ice bo ys, etc .
JOB CLASSIFICATION
8/6/2019 48015237 Job Evaluation
13/20
P OINT METHODP OINT METHOD This meth od is wi dely use d curre ntly.
In this meth od job s are expresse d in terms of keyf act ors .
P oints are assi gn e d to each f act or a f ter pr ortising each f act or in or der of imp orta nce .
The p oints are summe d up t o determi ne the wa gerate for the j ob.
Job s with similar p oint totals are place d in similar paygra des
8/6/2019 48015237 Job Evaluation
14/20
8/6/2019 48015237 Job Evaluation
15/20
Table: Conversion of Job Grade Points into Money ValueP oint ra ng e Daily wa ge rate (R s) Job gra des of key
ba nk off icials
500 -600 300 -400 1 Off icer 600 -700 400 -500 2 Acc ounta nt700 -800 500 -600 3 Ma na ger I Scale800 -900 600 -700 4 Ma na ger II Scale900 -1 ,000 700 -800 5 Ma na ger III Scale
ORG434: AdvancedHRM 15
8/6/2019 48015237 Job Evaluation
16/20
F actor Compari s onF actor Compari s onM e thodM e thod
It is m ore systematic a nd scie ntif ic meth od of job evaluati on.
Though it is the m ost c omplex meth od of all, it iscon siste nt a nd apprecia ble .
Und er this meth od , instea d of ra nk ing complete j ob s,
each j ob is ra nk e d acc or ding to a series of f act ors .
8/6/2019 48015237 Job Evaluation
17/20
These factors include:
> me ntal e ffort.> physical e ffort.> s kills nee de d.>
resp on sibility.> wor king cond ition s .> kno w-how.> pr ob lem s olving a bilities .
> acc ounta bility, etc .
Wa ges are assi gn e d to the j ob in comparis on to itsra nk ing on each j ob f act or .
8/6/2019 48015237 Job Evaluation
18/20
Compari s on of Job EvaluationCompari s on of Job EvaluationM e thod sM e thod s
Advantage Disadvantage
RankingRanking F ast, simple, easy toF ast, simple, easy toexplain, suitable for smallexplain, suitable for smallorg, not expensive.org, not expensive.
Not very accurate , not Not very accurate , notuseful for largeuseful for large org.,leastorg.,leastused methodused method
Cl assificationCl assification Can group a wide rangeCan group a wide rangeof work together in oneof work together in onesystem, simple, moresystem, simple, moreaccurate than rakingaccurate than rakingmethod.method.
Not useful for large org, Not useful for large org,time consuming, nottime consuming, notinvolved detailed jobinvolved detailed jobanalysis.analysis.
PointPoint Compensable factors callCompensable factors callout basis for out basis for comparisons.comparisons.Compensable factorsCompensable factorscommunicate what iscommunicate what isvalued.valued.
Can become bureaucraticCan become bureaucraticand ruleand rule--bound. bound.
8/6/2019 48015237 Job Evaluation
19/20
Compari s on of Job EvaluationCompari s on of Job EvaluationM e thod sM e thod s
Advantage Disadvantage
F actor comparison F actor comparison methodmethod
F inds wages for a job,F inds wages for a job,wages can bewages can becalculated speedily,calculated speedily,greater consistency ingreater consistency inthe judgment, size of the judgment, size of
jobs can be measured. jobs can be measured.
Expensive, timeExpensive, timeconsuming,consuming,
8/6/2019 48015237 Job Evaluation
20/20
top related