©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC hdjn.com The Changing Face of Charity Care Presenters: Kathy Abshire, VP of Finance, Children’s Hospital of.

Post on 29-Dec-2015

225 Views

Category:

Documents

2 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

Transcript

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com

The Changing Face of Charity Care

Presenters:Kathy Abshire, VP of Finance, Children’s Hospital of the King’s DaughtersEmily Towey, Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PCMike Newby, Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC

September 23, 2015

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com 2

1. Healthcare Reform – What’s New?

2. Taming “Bad Debt” Escalation

3. Re-Defining “Charity Care”

4. Hospital-Sponsored Subsidies

5. Tax Exempt Status and 501(r)

Program Overview

Disclaimer: This presentation is offered for discussion purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com 3

• The 2010 Affordable Care Act (ACA) was designed to extend coverage to many nonelderly uninsured people nationwide.

– Medicaid Coverage Expansion

– Marketplace Coverage

Healthcare ReformWhat’s New?

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com 4

ACA Medicaid Coverage ExpansionCurrent Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions

Source: “Status of State Action on the Medicaid Expansion Decision,” KFF State Health Facts, updated September 1, 2015.

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com 5

ESI Public Exchanges

$1,135

$2,500

$6,250

Marketplace CoverageSelection of “Ultra”-High Deductible Plans

Annual Deductibles of Individual Plans Offered For ESI1 and Public Exchanges

2014

MeanMedian

Max

• Employer-Sponsored Insurance.• Silver plans, medical deductible only.

Annual Deductibles of Individual Plans Selected on eHealth

13%

3%

11%

5%

30%

39%

$6,000+

$3,000-$5,999

$2,000-$2,999

$1,000-$1,999

$500-$999< $500

October 2013 – March 2014

Source: Breakaway Policy Strategies, “Eight Million and Counting: A Deeper Look at Premiums, Cost Sharing and Benefit Design in the New Health Insurance Marketplaces,” May 2014; eHealth, “Health Insurance Price Index Report for Open Enrollment and Q1 2014,” May 2014; Health Care Advisory Board interviews and analysis.

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com 6

• Most patients covered through Medicaid-expansion were previously uninsured, so new Medicaid enrollees will likely reduce both charity care and bad debt.

• Marketplace coverage will likely reduce charity care, but increase bad debt due to increase in HDHP coverage.

• The shift from traditional employer-sponsored insurance to HDHPs will significantly increase bad debt and reduce overall net patient revenue due to exchange-based health plans’ less generous rates (e.g., 15% less than employer-sponsored plan rates).

• As employers/plans shift healthcare costs to patients, patients’ price sensitivity increases and they will shop the market for the best deal in healthcare or will forgo the service.

In Summary……Where applicable,

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com 7

So Now What?

Taming “Bad Debt” Escalation• “Bad Debt”

• Any bill submitted for payment by a third-party payer or patient which is not paid in full, and unlikely to be paid for various reasons

Redefining “Charity Care”• “Charity care” or “Financial

Assistance” (IRS)

• “Free or discounted health services provided to a person who meets the organization’s criteria for financial assistance, and are unable to pay for all or a portion of the services.”

• Financial assistance does NOT include bad debt or uncollectable charges

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com 8

1. Healthcare Reform – What’s New?

2. Taming “Bad Debt” Escalation

3. Re-Defining “Charity Care”

4. Hospital-Sponsored Subsidies

5. Tax Exempt Status and 501(r)

Program Overview

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com 9

• Patient Registration “The Basics”:

– Verify insurance eligibility/benefits for patients

– Identify patients qualifying for charity care and/or Medicaid benefits

– Automate authorization retrieval and tracking

– Accurately estimate patient obligations at or prior to service

NOTE: EMTALA rules for emergency services

Taming “Bad Debt” EscalationPatient Collections- Old Strategies

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com 10

• Where do we focus our efforts?

Taming “Bad Debt” EscalationPatient Collections – New Strategies

HighLow

Level of Bad Debt by Service Line

OutpatientImaging

OutpatientSurgery

InpatientMedical

InpatientSurgical Obstetrics ED

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com 11

• Identify the “tipping point” and try to stay under it

– Bills exceeding 5% of patient income unlikely to be paid

• Point of Service Collections

• Pre-payment Collections

• Financial Counseling and Alternative Options for Patients

• Optimizing Front Office Performance

• Patient Obligation Estimation Technology

Taming “Bad Debt” EscalationPatient Collections – New Strategies

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com 12

• Interest Free Loans

– Hospital alleviates patients’ financial concerns through interest-free, low monthly payment programs.

– Loans are non-punitive – no penalties for delinquency (no interest, late fees or costs).

– Hospital pays a servicing fee

– Hospital realizes savings due to reduced or eliminated collection costs

Taming “Bad Debt” EscalationFinancial Counseling/Alternative Options for Patients

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com 13

Taming “Bad Debt” Escalation

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com 14

• Pre-service deposits, Post-service payment plan with auto-deduction for patient’s credit card/bank account

• Targeted Price Discounts for Patients

– MedStar’s StarPass urgent care service discount program

Taming “Bad Debt” EscalationFinancial Counseling/Alternative Options for Patients

Caring for Virginia’s Children

Comprehensive Pediatric Health System

206-Bed Freestanding Children’s Hospital

17 Primary Care Pediatric Practices

Five Surgical Subspecialty Practices

30+ Pediatric Subspecialty Clinics

Almost 3,000 employees

36 Locations

From Williamsburg to Elizabeth City, NC

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com

CHKD - Bad Debt

• Bad debt as a percentage of total charges averages 1%

• Bad debt write offs are comprised of 46% uninsured and 54% underinsured and this mix has been consistent the past 3 years; however….

• Patient responsibility (including uninsured) as a percentage of total A/R is:

– 8.4% FY15

– 6.5% FY14

– 6.1% FY13

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com

CHKD - Managing Bad Debt

• Manage Medicaid enrollments – Optimize hospital presumptive eligibility (HPE)

– Screening during charity care application process

– Onsite application assistance

– Mail letters

• Attempt to get charity care in place prior to incurring collection/legal fees

• Increase co-pay/deductible collections on front end– Ripple effect for deductible - more refunds required when other provider

claims are adjudicated before hospital

• Considering implementing a patient estimator software tool (all vendors who read this – contact Amy McClanan not me)

• We do not allow premium assistance payments

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com 18

1. Healthcare Reform – What’s New?

2. Taming “Bad Debt” Escalation

3. Re-Defining “Charity Care”

4. Hospital-Sponsored Subsidies

5. Tax Exempt Status and 501(r)

Program Overview

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com 19

• Definition of “Financial Assistance” (IRS)

– “free or discounted health services provided to a person who meets the organization’s criteria for financial assistance, and are unable to pay for all or a portion of the services.”

– Financial assistance does NOT include bad debt, uncollectable charges, self-pay / prompt pay discounts and contractual allowances.

• VIRGINIA CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC NEED DEFINITION

– “Charity Care means health care services delivered for which it was determined at the time of service provision that no payment was expected.”

Redefining “Charity Care”

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com 20

• Should charity care or discounted care be made available to uninsured/non-Medicaid-eligible patients who could have obtained coverage through the federal insurance exchange?

• Possible Charity Care Policy Requirements:

– Impose a charity care “fine” for these patients, reducing their charity-care discount by some amount

– Require uninsured patients requesting care during open enrollment period who qualify for a federal premium subsidy to buy insurance before the hospital waives charges

– Postpone elective procedures for uninsured patients eligible for subsidized coverage under federal exchange plan until they are able to obtain such coverage

Redefining “Charity Care”

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com 21

• Insurers impose contractual duty on Participating Providers to make a reasonable effort to bill and collect the applicable copay and coinsurance amounts.

• Routine waiver of patient obligation may result in a breach of contract law suit.

• Negotiate language to allow accommodation of patients with documented financial limitations (consistent with hospital’s charity care policy).

Redefining “Charity Care”Discounting Care as a Participating Provider

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com 22

• Typically offered to patients without insurance coverage, but what about patients with high deductibles?

Redefining “Charity Care”Time-of-Service Cash Payment Discounts

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com 23

• Expand policy to include patients with HDHPs and underinsured status

Caution: Special Rules on Waiver of Copays

Redefining “Charity Care”Solution

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com 24

• Federal Civil Monetary Penalties Law and Anti-Kickback Statute

– Prohibit offering Medicare/Medicaid beneficiaries remuneration to induce the beneficiary to order or receive services covered by Medicare/Medicaid

– Remuneration includes waiver of copay and deductibles

• Financial Hardship Exception

Redefining “Charity Care”Waiver of Copays for Medicare/Medicaid Beneficiaries

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com 25

• Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company vs. Health Diagnostic Laboratory Inc.

– $84M lawsuit

– HDL is an out-of-network lab

– HDL accused of “ongoing, fraudulent fee-forgiving scheme”

– HDL accused of luring Cigna beneficiaries in by telling them they do not have to pay their share of the cost (aka, “Insurance Only Billing)

Redefining “Charity Care”Discounting Care as a Non-Par Provider

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com

CHKD - Charity Care

• The national average of charity care charges to total gross charges is 15%

• Our charity care charges average $6M/year or approximately 1% of gross charges

– most non-insured patients meet Medicaid income criteria

– low birth weight, 30 day minimum stay

– emergent IP stays for undocumented patients

• More recently we have seen a rise in charity requests for:

– young adults who have aged out of Medicaid

– undocumented

– international

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com

CHKD - Third Party Payer Changes

• Payers are under pressure to reduce costs

• Cost shifting to higher patient responsibility

– FY15 - 3.2%; FY 14 and FY13 – 2.8%

– Represents a 14% increase

• Other third party pressures

– Steerage to lower cost facilities

• Infusion/drugs, radiology, some surgical

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com 28

1. Healthcare Reform – What’s New?

2. Taming “Bad Debt” Escalation

3. Re-Defining “Charity Care”

4. Hospital-Sponsored Subsidies

5. Tax Exempt Status and 501(r)

Program Overview

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com 29

• Some providers propose paying for insurance for their own patients

• Sebelius letter – private exchange products are not “federal health programs”

• CMS FAQ - will seriously scrutinize provider insurance purchases

• Insurers object

Hospital-Sponsored Subsidies

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com 30

• Monongahela Valley Hospital (Pennsylvania) partners with Patient Advocacy Foundation and Leukemia and Lymphoma Society

• Average grant provided to qualified cancer patient is $5,000

Hospital-Sponsored SubsidiesChemotherapy Copay Assistance

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com 31

1. Healthcare Reform – What’s New?

2. Taming “Bad Debt” Escalation

3. Re-Defining “Charity Care”

4. Hospital-Sponsored Subsidies

5. Tax Exempt Status and 501(r)

Program Overview

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com 32

• Charity care or financial assistance at cost

• Unreimbursed Medicaid

• Unreimbursed other means- tested government programs

• Community health improvement services

• Health professional education

• Subsidized health services

• Research

• Cash In-kind contributions

Maintaining Tax-ExemptStatusTax-Exempt Status Qualification requires the provision of “community benefit”:

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com 33

• Growth in Unreimbursed Medicaid may mitigate fear that a provider’s tax-exempt status is in jeopardy

• Hospitals are also focusing more on “community health improvement” through population and preventative health initiatives

• Support existing public health initiatives

Maintaining Tax-Exempt Status

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com 34

• Part of Affordable Care Act – first specific requirements imposed on 501(c)(3) hospitals.

• Applies to each hospital facility operated by a 501(c)(3) entity.

• Requires a community health needs assessment to be developed and made widely available every three years.

• Requires each hospital facility to develop a “response” to the CHNA through an implementation strategy.

• Each must be adopted by the Board and made transparent to the public.

501(r) Overview

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com

• Rules regarding exemption requirements for nonprofit hospitals

• Requires each hospital facility to maintain a financial assistance policy, but does not mandate minimum charity care.

• Regulations specify what needs to be explained in the FAP and how they are made available.

• Limitations on charges to FAP-eligible patients for emergency and medically necessary care.

• Limitations on extraordinary collection activities.

• Final regulations released in December 2014

501(r)Overview

35

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com

• 501(r)(1)—Definitions; what it means to be a charitable hospital organization

• 501(r)(2)—Consequences of noncompliance with 501(r) requirements

• 501(r)(3)—Community Health Needs Assessment (not covered in this presentation)

• 501(r)(4)—Financial Assistance Policy (FAP) and Emergency Medical Care Policy

• 501(r)(5)—Limitations on Charges

• 501(r)(6)—Billing and Collections

501(r)Components

36

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com

• Could jeopardize 501(c)(3) exemption of the hospital

• Excise taxes

• Subjection income of facility to corporate income tax

• Tax-exempt bonds

– Revenues from hospital would not be considered unrelated business income for tax-exempt bonds

• 403(b) plans

• Sales and use tax exemptions

• Property tax exemptions

• Public relations

501(r)(2)Consequences of Failing to Comply

37

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com

• Minor Omissions/Errors

– Not “failure” if minor omission/error or due to reasonable cause

– Hospital must quickly correct the omission/error and reviews/revises procedures to facilitate compliance

• If not a minor error/omission, the failure to comply will be “excused” if

– The error/omission is not willful or egregious

– Corrected

– Properly disclosed per Revenue Procedure

• Willful or egregious: gross negligence, reckless disregard, or willful neglect

501(r)(2)Failure to Comply

38

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com

• Documentation of 501(r) compliance is crucial

– Excellent documentation of practices and procedures

– Good faith attempt to implement and comply

– Monitor ongoing compliance

– Procedures to identify and correct failures

• Correction/disclosure procedures in Rev. Proc. 2015-21

• Disclosure made on Form 990 Schedule H for year failure discovered

501(r)(2)Compliance

39

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com 40

• Identifying a complete list of providers

• Identifying charity care up front

• Provision requiring patients to enroll in subsidy coverage for which they are eligible for before we grant charity care

• Consider presumptive or catastrophic eligibility:

– Estimated income and/or assets

– State-funded prescription programs

– WIC participants; food stamp eligibility; subsidized school lunch participants

– Medicaid spend down eligibility

– Low income/subsidized housing residents

CHKD – 501(r) Challenges

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com

• Requires a hospital facility to have a written policy

• FAP must include:

– Eligibility criteria for free or discounted care

– Application method

– Actions that may be taken if nonpayment (can be in separate billing and collection policy)

– Specific Emergency Medical Care Policy

501(r)(4)Financial Assistance Policies (FAP)

41

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com

• FAP must:

– Cover the hospital and all providers other than the hospital that may deliver medically necessary or emergency care

– Specify which providers not covered by FAP

• For “medically necessary care,” provider may use Medicare definition, state law definition, or generally accepted standards of care in community

501(r)(4)Financial Assistance Policies (FAP)

42

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com

• Eligibility criteria for financial assistance and whether assistance includes discounted or free care– Can determine eligibility based on information provided by others

– Prior FAP eligibility determination

– Written or oral forms of information

• Need to describe all discounts under FAP (not necessarily all discounts by the hospital)

• No mandated eligibility requirements• Must describe the basis for calculating amounts charged to

patients– Needs to specifically state that FAP-eligible patients will not be charged

more for emergency or other medically necessary care generally billed to individuals who have insurance covering such care

501(r)(4)Financial Assistance Policies (FAP)

43

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com

• Publicizing FAP Documents (FAP, FAP application, and Plain Language Summary)

– Online

– Paper: Made available on request; in public locations in hospital (emergency room and admission areas); by mail

– In Person

– In the Community: reach those most likely to need financial assistance

501(r)(4)FAP Publication

44

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com

• Hospital must provide at intake or discharge

• Include notice of availability of financial assistance, office contact information, and online information

• Translating FAP Documents

– Translation for those with “limited English proficiency” (LEP)

– Final rule: Hospital must translate FAP documents if community has 5% or 1,000 LEP population (proposed rule had set threshold at 10%)

501(r)(4)FAP Publication

45

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com

CHKD - Financial Assistance Policy

• We use a sliding scale discount income as a percentage of FPL:

– 175% or less allows free care

– Sliding scale up to 400% of FPL

• Limited to residents in the region who have a valid legal presence in the United States

• We use the lowest negotiated commercial insurance rates when calculating the maximum amounts that will be collected

• CHKD has not adjusted its charity care income thresholds to encourage patients to go to the exchange

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com

• Amounts generally billed (AGB)

• Final regulations allow two methods for calculating AGB

– Look-back method

– Prospective method

• A hospital can changes its AGB method, but must update FAP to reflect change before it takes effect

• Final regulations updated look-back calculation for AGB

501(r)(5)Limitations on Charges

47

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com

• Hospital must make “reasonable efforts” to determine patient’s eligibility under FAP before taking extraordinary collection actions (ECAs)

• Timeline

– Notification Period (120 days after first bill post-discharge)

– Application Period (240 days after first bill post-discharge)

– ECA Notification Period (30 day notice period required before initiating ECA—potentially day 210 of Application Period)

– If more than one episode of care, timeline starts with most recent episode of care

501(r)(6)Billing and Collections

48

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com

• ECA must include notice of:

– Financial assistance may be available

– What specific type of collection action the hospital is taking

– Deadline (at least thirty days)

– Plain language summary of FAP

501(r)(6)Billing and Collections

49

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com

• If hospital receives FAP application

– That is complete, hospital must notify applicant in writing of determination

– That is incomplete, hospital give reasonable period of time for applicant to correct/respond

501(r)(6)Billing and Collections

50

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com

• Not an ECA: liens by hospital for personal injury judgments, settlements, compromises, bankruptcy claims, certain sales of debt

• New type of ECA:

– If Hospital defers or denies care or requires advance payment for prior care

– before providing medically necessary care

– because of patient’s previous nonpayment for bills covered by FAP

501(r)(6)Billing and Collections

51

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com 52

• Good Governance.

• Intermediate Sanctions.

• Private benefit / private inurement.

• Unrelated business income tax.

• State tax exemption (e.g., property, license, sales).

• File your Form 990s!

Maintaining Tax Exempt StatusOther Thoughts

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC • hdjn.com 53

• Address Issues Up Front

• 501(r) Training / Compliance Training

• Manage Self-pays

• Manage Bad Debt

Final Thoughts

www.hdjn.com | (866) 967-9604

©2015 Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, PC

Kathryn.abshire@chkd.org

Questions

Emily Towey

etowey@hdjn.com

Mike Newby

mnewby@hdjn.com

Kathy Abshire

54

top related