Transcript

C O N C E P T   &   O P T I O N S  C a s e   S t ud i e s  

                 

UD  Lecture  Aula  A1.1,  Lecco  

05.11.2012  

Politecnico di Milano!Urban Design course 2012-13!

Presentation Structure!

Recap!!

- Thinking process!- Instances!

- Knowledge!- Summary!

10-­‐15  Min.  Presenta=on  

Concept + Options!

!!

in General!in Brief!

10-­‐15  Min.  Presenta=on  

Case studies!!!

60-­‐90  Min.  Presenta=on  

INTERNALIZED!SYNOPTIC!

INCREMENTAL!

RADICAL!PLURALISTIC!

FRAGMENTAL!

Intui t ive ! Goals first !

Comprehensive !

Inhabi tants Values !

+ Socia l Aspects !

… Not Complete !Based on Socia l Processes !

Demands!

Planning + Special topics!

Population + Local

Economy!Environment

+ Site!

Type of Project!

Community / Citizens!Clients!

INSTANCES!

No  one  method  ANALYSIS!

KNOWLEDGE!

HISTORICAL  EVOLUTION  OF  THE  CONTEXT  &  MORPHOLOGY    

SOCIAL  POPULATIONS  &  ECONOMIC  SYSTEM  (STATE  AND  TREND)    

LAND  USE,  FUNCTIONS  &  SERVICES/FACILITIES    

PLANNING  &  PROJECTS  EXISTING  FRAMEWORK    

LANDSCAPE  &  VISUAL  DIMENSION    

ENVIRONMENTAL  COMPONENTS  AND  CHARACTERISTICS    

SYNTHESIS  OF  CONTEXT  ANALYSIS    

MOVEMENT  NETWORK  &  PUBBLIC  TRANSPORTS    

BEST  PRACTICES  (ISSUES,  CONTEXT)  

SUMMARY!

Presentation Structure!

Recap!!

- Thinking process!- Instances!

- Knowledge!- Summary!

10-­‐15  Min.  Presenta=on  

Concept + Options!

!!

in General!in Brief!

10-­‐15  Min.  Presenta=on  

Case studies!!!

60-­‐90  Min.  Presenta=on  

C o n c e p t  

A  general  idea,  or  something  conceived  in  the  mind  

C o n c e p t  

Created  by  abstracGng  or  removing  the  uncommon  characteris=c  from  several  par=cular  ideas.  

  R E D  

John  Locke  

C o n c e p t  

Form  

FuncGon  Program  Requirements  

Goals  &  Objec=ves  Constraints   Problems  

Poten=als  

+  V I S ION  

C o n c e p t  

Studies  Collected  Goals  &  Objec=ves  Level  of  Knowledge  

One’s  own  experience  

Comes  from…  

C o n c e p t  

Sketch,  Sketch,  Sketch…  and  then  Sketch  again  Alterna=ves  (Op=ons)  

Making  Process…  

C o n c e p t  

Sketches  +  Diagrams  Images  +  Foto  Montage  Physical  or  Digital  Models  Videos  or  Animated  Flash  

Might  be  represented  by…  

C o n c e p t  Might  be  represented  by…  

C o n c e p t  The  Best  

 

CreaGve              but  also          RaGonal    

New  (Out  of  the  box)        but                Not  Invasive    

Comprehensive,  Complex    but  also          Simple    

AestheGcally  Appealing    but  also          Meaningful  

Presentation Structure!

Recap!!

- Thinking process!- Instances!

- Knowledge!- Summary!

10-­‐15  Min.  Presenta=on  

Concept + Options!

!!

in General in Brief!

10-­‐15  Min.  Presenta=on  

Case studies!!!

60-­‐90  Min.  Presenta=on  

C a s e   S t u d i e s  

Danilo  Palazzo  

Roberto  -­‐  Chiara  

Anonymous!  

RNDM  

Artur  Borejszo  

Ager  

de  Architekten  Cie  

The  Light  Bulb  

T h e   L i g h t   B u l b  

B e r n a r e g g i o  

Cemetary  Buffer  Zone  Built  Area  Limits  

1  Solid  &  Void  dDistribu=on  

2  Plan-­‐Volume  Hypothesis  

3  Three  Dimensional  Modeling    

4  Evalua=on  of  the  alterna=ves  

1.  RECOGNITION  OF  PUBLIC  AND  PRIVATE  RELATIONSHIP  WITH  SPACE    

2.  CONFORMITY  WITH  THE  CONTEXT  (formal  and  typological).  

3.  FLEXIBILITY  of  IMPLEMENTATION  (Phasing)  

4.  EASE  OF  REALIZATION  OF  UNDERGROUND  PARKING    

5.  QUALITY  OF  GREEN  PUBLIC  SPACES  

6.  ORIENTATION  AND  OPTIMAL  LAYOUT  OF  BUILDINGS    

Clearly  dis=nguishable  &  separate  from  private    

Perceivable  by  the  distribu=on  of  volumes    

No  dis=nc=on  b/w  public  &  private  public  spaces  

Homogenous  with  context  and  con=nue  the  various  typologies  

Homogenous  with  context    

Non  Homogenious  

Ability  to  split  the  interven=on  in  more  than  two  successive  stages    Two  successive  stages  only    

All  in  a  single  interve=on  

Easy  

Difficult  Impossible  

North-­‐South  without  mutual  shading  

Various  without  mutual  shading  

Various  with  mutual  shading  

1  

2  

3

4  

Con=nuous  with  exis=ng  green    

Separate  from  exis=ng  green    

Non  exis=ng  

ExisGng  

Designed  

Designed  

PUBLIC  SPACES:     -­‐   Crea=on   of   public  spaces  aggrega=on;  -­‐  Recogni=on;  -­‐  Connec=on  with  the  network   of   exis=ng  public  spaces;  -­‐   C r e a = o n   a n d  e n h an c emen t   o f  green  spaces  

Designed  

BUILDINGS:  -­‐  Consistency  with  the  context  -­‐   Feasibility   of   the  interven=on   in  stages  temporally  separate  -­‐   Energy   op=miza=on  of  buildings  

Designed  

ROADS:  -­‐   Min imiz ing   the  impact   of   vehicular  traffic  on  the  area;  -­‐   P r o m o = o n   o f  mobility  slow  

Piazza  delle  Poste  1500  mq  Via  Mazzini/Via  Europa  1620  mq  Via  Montello/Via  Mazzini  1000  mq  Piazza  della  Repubblica  1230  mq  Sagrato  della  Chiesa  360  mq  

Parco  delle  scuole  2350  mq  Parco  del  municipio  6250  mq  Parco  via  V.  Emanuele  1680  mq  

Piazza  delle  Poste  1500  mq  Via  Mazzini/Via  Europa  1620  mq  Via  Montello/Via  Mazzini  1000  mq  Piazza  della  Repubblica  1230  mq  Sagrato  della  Chiesa  360  mq  Parco  delle  scuole  2350  mq  Parco  del  municipio  6250  mq  Parco  via  V.  Emanuele  1680  mq  

E u r o p a n   1 1   -­‐   T o l o u s e  

le  Mall  commerçant  (Spine  of  the  site)    le  Quai  équipé  (It  will  be  a  buffer  space  between  the  rails  and  the  new  neighborhood  and  a  true  sign  of  the  city  entrance  from  the  train.)    la  Halle  culturelle  (Memory  of  the  site)    le  Parvis  minéral  (Place  of  recrea=on,  leisure  and  interac=on)    la  Prairie  urbaine  (Green  space  of  the  area)    le  Quar=er  résiden=el  (Dense  and  lively)  

E u r o p a n   1 1   -­‐   V i e n n a  

Being  a  “lep  over“  of  the  construc=on  ac=vi=es  for  the  new  underground  tunnel  of  the  railway;  the  site  marks  an  important  spot  for  the  surrounding  area  which  is  dominated  by  historical  suburban  housing  types  with  a  high  amount  of  green  spaces.  The  site‘s  strategic  loca=on  between  two  public  transport  lines,  the  regional  train-­‐line  and  the  tramway  has  to  be  considered  when  it  comes  to  the  spa=al  and  programma=c  organiza=on  of  its  future  development.  Although,  on  the  one  hand,  the  underground  tunnel  and  the  rail  tracks  have  a  nega=ve  impact,  the  site  takes  advantage  of  being  at  the  crossroads  of  two  public  transport  lines  and  a  main  road  connec=on.  The  city  aims  at  a  development  which  should  be  An  architectural  and  programmaGc  “landmark“,  including  a  bandwidth  of  social  services,  small  scaled  commercial  uses,  intermodal  faciliGes  (bike  sharing)  and  high  quality  of  public  and  green  spaces.  It  has  to  be  explored  if  housing  is  possible  under  the  circumstances  of  enhanced  noise  and  vibra=ons.  It  will  be  decisive  how  the  site  can  combine  the  issues  of  ConnecGon,  DensificaGon  and  Quality  of  open  spaces.  

E v o l v i n g   C a l c o  

CALCO  

LECC

O

MILA

NO

COMO

COMPETITION  AIMS…  TO  BE  DESIGNED  FUNCTIONS    1.  The  Reorganiza=on  of  the  Children  Playing  Ground.    2.  The  Expansion  of  ExisGng  FaciliGes  and  Services.    3.  The  Construc=on  of  a  M.P.U.  4.  The  Redesigning  of  Public  Open  Spaces,  their  RelaGonship  with  their  Surroundings.    5.  The  Connec=on  with  the  Pedestrian  Walkways  Network  and  the  purpose  of   linking  the  area  to  the  system  of  sustainable  mobility  at  the  urban  scale  and  regional  /  provincial  level.    6.  The  Redesigning  of  Parking  Spaces   in   line  with  the  system  of  public  spaces  and  the  structure  of  urban  mobility.      

COMPETITION  GENERAL  GOALS…      1.  CREATE  a  new  “AGGREGATION  CENTER”  in  town  keeping  the  area  alive,  therefore  improving  the  ci=zen’s  quality  of  life.  2.   ISSUE   a   clear   message   for   an   ac=ve   support   of   bioconstruc=on,   RENEWABLE   ENERGY  SOURCES  AND  ENERGY  SAVING  as  a  way  toward  a  new  lifestyle.  3.  PROMOTE  and  reassess  the  exis=ng  infrastructures  through  an  effec=ve  public  expense  too.  4.   STIMULATE   some   new   business   opportuni=es   to   achieve   a   berer   and   quicker   economic  payoff  (ROI).  5.  REDEFINE  the  TOWN  PLANNING  STRUCTURE  TO  ACHIEVE  A  BETTER  IDENTITY.    

CONCLUSION   PROBLEMS - LACK OF WELL USED PUBLIC SPACES - FEW PEOPLE WALK THE STREET (NO SIDEWALKS, NOT PEDESTRIAN OR BIKE FRIENDLY) - DISCONNECTIVITY & DISCONTINUITY OF THE URBAN FABRIC - HIGH-SPEED ROAD PASSING THROUGH THE CITY CENTER

POTENTIALS - HISTORICAL VALUE ASSETS - PTCP ECOLOGICAL PATH THROUGH THE ADDA NORD PARK - EXISTENCE OF NATURAL, PROTECTED AREAS & AGRICULTURAL ZONES

CONSTRAINS - POLITICAL (FEW PLOTS TO BUILD) - NATURALLY PROTECTED AREAS

INFORMATION  

CONCLUSION   PROBLEMS STRATEGIES - LACK OF WELL USED PUBLIC SPACES - RELOCATION OF ROAD SS342 - FEW PEOPLE WALK THE STREET. - HORIZONTAL CONNECTION - DISCONNECTIVITY & DISCONTINUITY OF THE URBAN FABRIC - GREEN CORRIDOR CONTINUATION - HIGH-SPEED ROAD PASSING THROUGH THE CITY CENTER

POTENTIALS - HISTORICAL VALUE ASSETS - PTCP ECOLOGICAL PATH THROUGH THE ADDA NORD PARK - EXISTENCE OF NATURAL, PROTECTED AREAS & AGRICULTURAL ZONES

CONSTRAINS - POLITICAL (FEW PLOTS TO BUILD) - NATURALLY PROTECTED AREAS

INFORMATION  

PTCP  PATH:  

HIKING ACTIVITIES        

PTCP  PATH:  

HIKING ACTIVITIES  

CALCO  SHARED  PATH:  

- URBAN DIRECTED

(FAMILIES, ATHELETES, BIKES

AND CARS)

 CONCEPT  

1-­‐  Two  GREEN  HILLS  chains  moving  on  different  levels.  

2-­‐  PATHWAYS  s=tching  the  different  parts  of  the  two  green  belts.    

3-­‐  SHARED  SPACES  and  Urban  streets.    

4-­‐  THE  MASSES.  Emerging  from  the  green  hills  to  minimize  its  ar=ficial  impact  within  the  surroundings.    

5-­‐  THE  RED  LINE.  A  direct  expression  which  creates  an  unorthodox  movement  for  the  users  within  the  different  spaces  and  zones.    

 RED  LINE  -­‐  SUBTLE  ELEMENT  -­‐  DIALOGUE  -­‐  COLOR  IS  NEUTRAL  -­‐  SOUND  REFLECTING  WAVE  -­‐  CENTER  OF  INNOVATIVE  URBAN  SPACES  (LOCAL  &  INTERNATIONAL)  -­‐  INSPIRATION  FOR  NEIGHBORING  CITIES  

 CONCEPT  DEVELOPMENT  

MULTI-­‐PURPOSE  HALL  MATERIALIZATION  CONCEPT  IN  RELATION  TO  EXISTING  ONES  

FUNCTION  

M.P.H.  MATERIALIS  &  SHAPE  IN  RELATION  TO  EXISTING  ONES  

L e   G r a n d   P a r i s  

President   Nicolas   Sarkozy   commissioned   in   June   2008   ten   teams   of  architects  and  urban  planners  to  imagine  an  exemplary  "Grand  Paris"  a  sustainable  and  boldly  designed  capital.  The   project   was   hailed   being   the   most   ambiGous   since   Haussmann  changed  Paris  in  the  19th  century.  The  challenge  for  the  10  teams  was  envisioning  the  European  metropolis  in   2030   being   a   "post-­‐Kyoto"   green   urban   centre   which   allows   for  growth  beyond  the  current  two  million  Parisians  and  provides  them  with  anracGve  urban  environments.  

MVRDV  with  ACS  and  AAF�s  response  for  President  Sarkozy�’s  urban  planning  consultaGon  for  the  great  challenge  of  the  Greater  Paris  area  is  represented  in  four  parts:    The  �Synthesis�  The  �City  Calculator©�  The  �Data�  The  �ObservaGon�.    

     The  �Synthesis�  The  �City  Calculator©�  The  �Data�  The  �Observa=on�  

The   Synthesis   defines   the   spaGal   agenda   for   the   city,   based   on  ambiGous  and  responsible  strategies  for  the  French  capital.  

The   Data   gives   the   overview   of   the   detailed   research   on   the  func=oning   and   performance   of   Greater   Paris,   which   has   been   the  background  for  the  spa=al  proposals.  

The   City   Calculator©   is   a   proposed   demo   version   of   a   poten=al  sopware  and  possible  web  tool,  which  quan=fies  the  �behavior  and  performance�  of  a  city  and  makes  it  comparable  to  others.  

The   Observa=ons   are   a   series   of   ar=cles   on   the   backgrounds,   the  history,  the  poten=als  and  the  problems  of  the  French  metropolis.  

     The  �Synthesis�  The  �City  Calculator©�  The  �Data�  The  �Observa=on�  

The   City   Calculator©   is   a   proposed   demo   version   of   a   potenGal  soqware   and   possible   web   tool,   which   quanGfies   the  �behavior  and  performance�  of  a  city  and  makes  it  comparable  to  others.  

The   Synthesis   Defines   the   spa=al   agenda   for   the   city,   based   on  ambi=ous  and  responsible  strategies  for  the  French  capital.  

The   Data   gives   the   overview   of   the   detailed   research   on   the  func=oning   and   performance   of   Greater   Paris,   which   has   been   the  background  for  the  spa=al  proposals.  

The   Observa=ons   are   a   series   of   ar=cles   on   the   backgrounds,   the  history,  the  poten=als  and  the  problems  of  the  French  metropolis.  

     The  �Synthesis�  The  �City  Calculator©�  The  �Data�  The  �Observa=on�  

The   City   Calculator©   is   a   proposed   demo   version   of   a   poten=al  sopware  and  possible  web  tool,  which  quan=fies  the  �behavior  and  performance�  of  a  city  and  makes  it  comparable  to  others.  

The   Data   gives   the   overview   of   the   detailed   research   on   the  funcGoning  and  performance  of  Greater  Paris,  which  has  been  the  background  for  the  spaGal  proposals.  

The   Observa=ons   are   a   series   of   ar=cles   on   the   backgrounds,   the  history,  the  poten=als  and  the  problems  of  the  French  metropolis.  

The   Synthesis   Defines   the   spa=al   agenda   for   the   city,   based   on  ambi=ous  and  responsible  strategies  for  the  French  capital.  

     The  �Synthesis�  The  �City  Calculator©�  The  �Data�  The  �ObservaGon�  

The   City   Calculator©   is   a   proposed   demo   version   of   a   poten=al  sopware  and  possible  web  tool,  which  quan=fies  the  �behavior  and  performance�  of  a  city  and  makes  it  comparable  to  others.  

The   Data   gives   the   overview   of   the   detailed   research   on   the  func=oning   and   performance   of   Greater   Paris,   which   has   been   the  background  for  the  spa=al  proposals.  

The  ObservaGons   are   a   series   of   arGcles   on   the   backgrounds,   the  history,  the  potenGals  and  the  problems  of  the  French  metropolis.  

The   Synthesis   Defines   the   spa=al   agenda   for   the   city,   based   on  ambi=ous  and  responsible  strategies  for  the  French  capital.  

Video  Link    

hrp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q2aUi-­‐kgxTs  

D . I . Y .   U r b a n i sm  

Video  Link    

hrp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NSwtduhoHOU  

T H A T ’ S I T !

top related