1 Cultural-historical and discursive tools for analyzing critical conflicts in students’ development Annalisa Sannino University of Salerno, Italy 16º.
Post on 21-Dec-2015
217 Views
Preview:
Transcript
1
University of Salerno, Italy ______________________________________________________ Annalisa Sannino
Cultural-historical and discursive toolsfor analyzing critical conflicts
in students’ developmentAnnalisa Sannino
University of Salerno, Italy
16º InPLA - Intercâmbio de Pesquisas em Lingüística Aplicada
Minicourse 2nd-5th of May 2007, São Paulo
2
1.Introduction:
a journey through my teaching experience at the
University of Salerno
3
Two starting points:
• The meeting for welcoming students to the 2003-2004 academic year
• My class on Psychology of Learning and Memory
4
Two modes of involvement:
• passionate
• vs rational approach to studies
5
A contradiction rises and hits the instructor:
students wanting to make their life as easy as possible, and then choosing the hardest evaluation mode
6
The contradiction is recognized as an opportunity for change:
The instructor becomes
a teacher-interventionist-researcher
7
2. Theoretical framework:
Cultural-historical activity theory (CHAT)
8
CHAT…
• …brings subjective human experience into connection with the external material world
• …promotes transformation in the subject and in her way to operate in the world
9
In this inquiry CHAT is used for…
• …exploring the developmental potential of the identified contradiction for both my students and myself as a teacher
• …promoting transformation in my students and myself as a teacher
10
What is the nature of the transformation in the subject
I aimed at as a teacher-interventionist-researcher?
11
Transformation aimed at:
• Learning how to deal with critical situations, i.e., situations in which the subject faces the impossibility of realizing internal necessities that would fulfill her expectations in life
Using Vasilyuk’s (1988) terminology and key concept…
• …promoting the process of experiencing, i.e. promoting or reinforcing engagement in struggling against impossibility, in order to realize internal necessities
12
Transformation aimed at:
• Learning how to deal with critical situations, i.e., situations in which the subject faces the impossibility of realizing internal necessities that would fulfill her expectations in life
Using Vasilyuk’s (1988) terminology and key concept…
• …promoting the process of experiencing, i.e. promoting or reinforcing engagement in struggling against impossibility, in order to realize internal necessities
13
Contradiction (Ilyenkov, 1977): a key concept used in CHAT to
interpret critical situations
Mismatches
through which activities
renew themselves
14
Conflict (Vasilyuk, 1988) : a key concept used in psychology to
describe critical situations
The individual surrendering in face of contradictory motives that, in the given
form, can’t be subjectively solved
15
An example of the individual surrendering in the face of
contradictory motives
Student University teacher
Being a productive academic
Being a caring teacher
Nourishing intellectual interests
Being a successful student
16
Difference between conflict experiences and contradictions
Level of analysis
Conflict Short-time actions
Contradiction Activity and inter-activity, which has a much longer life cycle
17
Difference between conflict experiences and contradictions
Level of analysis
Conflict Short-time actions
Contradiction Activity and inter-activity, which has a much longer life cycle
Shift to exploring
the roots of conflicts
18
Transitional object (Winnicott, 1974; Leiman, 1999) : a key notion used here to conceptualize
the shift between action level of conflict to activity level of contradiction
Objects to which individuals are
attached to and, at the same time,
struggle to separate from
19
Learning to shift from the level of conflict to the level of contradiction
• Individuals becoming conscious of being transitional objects for themselves
• and internalizing their transitionality as both
a weakness and as a strength
20
• Weakness: Students shaping themselves as potentially competent professionals are also exposed to live through conflicts in the university in a more painful way than other parties, which already have the economic and professional security that students aim at achieving through their studies
• Strength: Students, because they are not bound by any permanent position or economic tie, have the potential to turn their conflicts into developmental initiatives
An example of weakness and strength of being transitional
21
Processes of experiencing…
… as both processes of life and processes of acting upon life
22
The intrinsic autobiographical nature of experiencing
23
3. The setting of the inquiry
24
• My class of Psychology of Memory and Learning in the Faculty of Education at the University of Salerno
• 128 students, future elementary and kindergarten teachers
25
4. Methodology
26
Turning the class in an object-oriented intervention
for understanding and re-designing unfolding critical events in the students’ life at the University
27
Using pragmatic discourse analysis
for studying discourse as it occurs in
these specific teaching and research-intervention situations as a pragmatic phenomenon
28
Redefining autobiography by focusing on
its transformative potential
29
Main phases in the intervention
• Making introspective inquiries and autobiographical texts on the students’ experiences of communicative critical events
• Working on common tasks to share each others’ perspectives, build new knowledge about the critical events, and develop innovative solutions for the future
• After experimentations with the new solutions the day normally reserved for the final exam is spent evaluating the innovations carried out during the intervention, and for future-oriented joint accounting
30
Students read each other’s autobiographical texts
When the conflict experiences they wrote about involve directly others present in the class, participants work on their respective texts during separate sessions of the intervention
31
5. Analyses
32
Some conflicts and ways in which students live, recognize and work them out individually
• conflicts stemming from difficulties in the choice of University
ending up at the university because of the lack of work outside
• conflicts with professors during classes or oral
examination sessions
extreme representations of the professors
33
Few excerpts
Antonia, February 2004 (excerpt from the interview during the final exam): (…) When you are 32 years old you want to work. Instead of waiting outside, at least we get here another academic degree, and all these titles may give us more chances to work.
Livia, December 2003 (excerpt form the text of her speech during the second intervention in the classroom): When you go to the exam you see the professor as a God, somebody to be afraid of, because you know he can harm you; that’s why one is afraid to go to take an exam. That’s at least what happens to me. We should learn to see the professor as a person, and be aware that he can make you pass or not.
34
The emergence of an intermediate level between the level of conflict and the level of contradiction, while the students confront each others’ autobiographical texts
35
The emergence of an intermediate level between the level of conflict and the level of contradiction, while the students confront each others’ autobiographical texts
36
The emergence of an intermediate level between the level of conflict and the level of contradiction, while the students confront each others’ autobiographical texts
37
The emergence of an intermediate level between the level of conflict and the level of contradiction, while the students confront each others’ autobiographical texts
38
The emergence of an intermediate level between the level of conflict and the level of contradiction, while the students confront each others’ autobiographical texts
39
The emergence of an intermediate level between the level of conflict and the level of contradiction, while the students confront each others’ autobiographical texts
40
A step toward the level of contradiction
Conflict-contradictory experiences emerged during the last phase of the intervention
41
• Students articulated differences between this and other classes
• Students recognized developmental tensions that ‘pushed them’ through the class in a stimulating way
• Students articulated future-oriented accounts on the basis of what they have learned
42
Few excerpts
Angelica: The class developed on the basis on what actually the students already knew, and was built on that, instead of imposing itself on the basis of what the ideal student has learned before.
Marta: The way the class has been organized pushed us to study and motivated us, but, also, we experienced this sparkling tension, between curiosity and fear, when coming to the class we said “Let’s see what she will bring us today!”
Alessia: I have decided to ask other professors to do the same as you for their classes, especially the most complex ones, because this way to carry a class has lightened our work load without penalizing learning.
43
6. Discussion
44
S T E P 1 S T E P 2
C ultura l -h is to r ica l a nd d iscurs iv e a na ly ses
D isc uss io n s in the c la ss
D iscu ssio n s in th e c la ss
S tud e nts ’ ev a lua tio n o f
tea ch ing S tud e nts
S tud e nts a nd tea cher -in terv entio n is t
C la ss a nd tea cher
T h e c la s s T h e in terv en tio n
T h e p re sen t stu d y
S tud e nts a nd tea cher -in terv entio n is t
R ules C o m m u n ity D iv is io n o f la b o r
R ules D iv is io n o f la b o r
C o m m u n ity
Two main steps in the progression of the
collective work
45
S T E P 1 S T E P 2
C ultura l -h is to r ica l a nd d iscurs iv e a na ly ses
D isc uss io n s in the c la ss
D iscu ssio n s in th e c la ss
S tud e nts ’ ev a lua tio n o f
tea ch ing S tud e nts
S tud e nts a nd tea cher -in terv entio n is t
C la ss a nd tea cher
T h e c la s s T h e in terv en tio n
T h e p re sen t stu d y
S tud e nts a nd tea cher -in terv entio n is t
R ules C o m m u n ity D iv is io n o f la b o r
R ules D iv is io n o f la b o r
C o m m u n ity
a. Change in the nature of the tools through the process of the intervention
46
S T E P 1 S T E P 2
C ultura l -h is to r ica l a nd d iscurs iv e a na ly ses
D isc uss io n s in the c la ss
D iscu ssio n s in th e c la ss
S tud e nts ’ ev a lua tio n o f
tea ch ing S tud e nts
S tud e nts a nd tea cher -in terv entio n is t
C la ss a nd tea cher
T h e c la s s T h e in terv en tio n
T h e p re sen t stu d y
S tud e nts a nd tea cher -in terv entio n is t
R ules C o m m u n ity D iv is io n o f la b o r
R ules D iv is io n o f la b o r
C o m m u n ity
b. Flow in the subject-object positioning
during the class and the intervention
47
S T E P 1 S T E P 2
C ultura l -h is to r ica l a nd d iscurs iv e a na ly ses
D isc uss io n s in the c la ss
D iscu ssio n s in th e c la ss
S tud e nts ’ ev a lua tio n o f
tea ch ing S tud e nts
S tud e nts a nd tea cher -in terv entio n is t
C la ss a nd tea cher
T h e c la s s T h e in terv en tio n
T h e p re sen t stu d y
S tud e nts a nd tea cher -in terv entio n is t
R ules C o m m u n ity D iv is io n o f la b o r
R ules D iv is io n o f la b o r
C o m m u n ity
b. Flow in the subject-object positioning
during the class and the intervention
StudentsTeacher The intervention
as an historically recursive self-reflective event
48
c. Conflicts occurring as actual daily worries for students, which justify their questions often considered as inopportune or impertinent by professors
d. Being transitional and amplification of the subject sensitivity in regard to possible developmental resources available in the environment
49
6. Conclusion
50
a. The beginning of a definition of zone of proximal development
in this setting
paraphrasing Vygotsky (1987, p.209)…
this study allowed to measure the distance between the actual level of this students’ development, as determined by their capacity to deal alone with the conflicts related to their university experiences, and the level of potential development, as determined by their capacity to work on these
conflicts in collaboration with other students and the teacher
51
b. The exploration and concretization
of the connection between
students conflictual experience with the
material contradictions
in the context in which
they live
52
c. The challenge for faculty members to become promoters of transformations in the
subject and in the university…
…engaging in first-person inquiries as teacher-interventionist-researcher
…becoming models of change-oriented agent for students, future teachers who will have to deal with analogous conflictual-contradictory experiences in their future professional life
53
For contacts:Annalisa Sannino
University of Salerno Department of EducationVia Ponte Don Melillo84084 Fisciano (SA)
E-mail: ansannin@unisa.it
top related