1 Committee of the Regions Commission on the EU Budget 13 February 2014 Opinion on the EU Budget execution Manfred Kraff Deputy Director-General DG Budget.

Post on 01-Apr-2015

221 Views

Category:

Documents

4 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

Transcript

1

Committee of the RegionsCommission on the EU Budget

13 February 2014

Opinion on the EU Budget execution

Manfred KraffDeputy Director-General DG Budget

Accounting Officer of the Commission

1. SPEED OF BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION

2. BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION ERRORS

3. LIQUIDITY AND FINANCIAL PLANNING PROBLEMS

4. FOCUS ON RESULTS

2

AGENDA

3

Opinion on the EU Budget execution 13 February 2014

SPEED OF BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION

4

Country DECIDEDPrefinancing

(POA)Interim

Payments (IP)Total Payments

(POA+IP)

ABSORPTION INTERIM

PAYMENTS

ABSORPTION TOTAL

PAYMENTS

(EUR million) 1 2 3 4 = 2 + 3 5 = 3 / 1 6 = 4 / 1

Austria 524.4 39.3 408.4 447.8 77.88% 85.38%Belgium 1 073.2 80.5 689.9 770.4 64.29% 71.78%Bulgaria 1 185.5 106.7 574.6 681.3 48.47% 57.47%Cyprus 119.8 10.8 65.8 76.6 54.95% 63.95%Czech Republic 3 787.8 339.7 1 800.6 2 140.3 47.54% 56.51%Denmark 254.8 19.1 128.8 147.9 50.54% 58.04%Estonia 391.5 50.9 301.1 352.0 76.90% 89.90%Finland 618.6 46.4 439.6 486.0 71.07% 78.56%France 5 394.6 404.6 2 877.4 3 282.0 53.34% 60.84%Germany 9 380.7 703.6 6 204.3 6 907.9 66.14% 73.64%Greece 4 363.8 327.3 2 271.0 2 598.3 52.04% 59.54%Hungary 3 626.9 471.8 1 557.2 2 029.0 42.93% 55.94%Ireland 375.4 28.2 234.5 262.7 62.48% 69.98%Italy 6 930.5 520.4 3 878.4 4 398.8 55.96% 63.47%Latvia 583.1 71.6 482.4 553.9 82.72% 95.00%Lithuania 1 028.3 133.7 677.1 810.8 65.85% 78.85%Luxembourg 25.2 1.9 15.1 17.0 59.94% 67.43%Malta 112.0 10.1 51.7 61.8 46.19% 55.19%Netherlands 830.0 62.3 450.3 512.6 54.26% 61.76%Poland 10 007.4 873.7 6 322.3 7 195.9 63.18% 71.91%Portugal 6 853.4 488.4 5 200.0 5 688.4 75.87% 83.00%Romania 3 684.2 478.9 1 031.4 1 510.4 28.00% 41.00%Slovakia 1 499.6 135.0 585.5 720.5 39.05% 48.05%Slovenia 755.7 68.0 464.4 532.4 61.45% 70.45%Spain 8 053.0 604.3 4 469.5 5 073.8 55.50% 63.00%Sweden 691.6 51.9 358.7 410.6 51.87% 59.37%United Kingdom 4 498.9 335.6 2 495.9 2 831.5 55.48% 62.94%

TOTAL 76 649.7 6 464.4 44 036.0 50 500.4 57.45% 65.88%

Period 2007-2013

ESF Absorption (end 2013)

5

Period 2007-2013

ERDF Absorption (end 2013)

Country DECIDEDPrefinancing

(POA)Interim

Payments (IP)Total Payments

(POA+IP)

ABSORPTION INTERIM

PAYMENTS

ABSORPTION TOTAL

PAYMENTS

(EUR million) 1 2 3 4 = 2 + 3 5 = 3 / 1 6 = 4 / 1

Austria 680.1 51.0 309.0 360.0 45.44% 52.94%Belgium 990.3 74.3 573.6 647.9 57.93% 65.43%Bulgaria 3 205.1 288.5 1 356.9 1 645.4 42.34% 51.34%Croatia 228.4 - - - 0.00% 0.00%Cyprus 279.5 25.2 167.1 192.2 59.79% 68.79%Czech Republic 13 932.8 1 233.8 5 746.8 6 980.6 41.25% 50.10%Denmark 254.8 19.1 110.3 129.4 43.29% 50.79%Estonia 1 860.2 167.4 1 301.7 1 469.2 69.98% 78.98%Finland 977.4 73.3 648.9 722.2 66.39% 73.89%France 8 052.7 604.0 4 233.7 4 837.7 52.57% 60.07%Germany 16 108.0 1 208.1 9 914.3 11 122.4 61.55% 69.05%Greece 12 149.3 911.2 7 808.6 8 719.8 64.27% 71.77%Hungary 12 649.7 1 138.5 7 055.4 8 193.9 55.78% 64.78%Ireland 375.4 28.2 235.2 263.3 62.65% 70.15%Italy 21 027.3 1 577.1 8 028.1 9 605.2 38.18% 45.68%Latvia 2 407.6 219.6 1 300.7 1 520.3 54.02% 63.15%Lithuania 3 442.0 309.8 2 425.8 2 735.6 70.48% 79.48%Luxemburg 25.2 1.9 15.3 17.2 60.74% 68.23%Malta 444.0 40.0 172.7 212.7 38.90% 47.90%Netherlands 830.0 62.3 485.1 547.3 58.44% 65.94%Poland 34 791.0 3 000.5 21 932.5 24 932.9 63.04% 71.66%Portugal 11 498.2 887.9 8 068.3 8 956.2 70.17% 77.89%Romania 8 976.5 807.9 2 483.9 3 291.8 27.67% 36.67%Slovakia 6 100.0 536.6 2 950.8 3 487.4 48.37% 57.17%Slovenia 1 933.8 174.0 1 304.9 1 479.0 67.48% 76.48%Spain 23 057.2 1 729.3 12 347.6 14 076.9 53.55% 61.05%Sweden 934.5 70.1 636.2 706.3 68.08% 75.58%United Kingdom 5 392.0 406.2 2 370.4 2 776.6 43.96% 51.50%Territorial Cooperation 7 922.8 648.7 3 979.5 4 628.2 50.23% 58.42%

TOTAL 200 525.7 16 294.2 107 963.5 124 257.7 53.84% 61.97%

6

Period 2007-2013

CF Absorption (end 2013)

Country DECIDEDPrefinancing

(POA)Interim

Payments (IP)Total Payments

(POA+IP)

ABSORPTION INTERIM

PAYMENTS

ABSORPTION TOTAL

PAYMENTS

(EUR million) 1 2 3 4 = 2 + 3 5 = 3 / 1 6 = 4 / 1

Austria - - - - 0.00% 0.00%Belgium - - - - 0.00% 0.00%Bulgaria 2 283.0 239.7 734.8 974.5 32.18% 42.68%Croatia 149.8 - - - 0.00% 0.00%Cyprus 213.2 22.4 84.1 106.5 39.46% 49.96%Czech Republic 8 819.0 926.0 3 521.4 4 447.4 39.93% 50.43%Denmark - - - - 0.00% 0.00%Estonia 1 151.7 144.0 801.3 945.3 69.57% 82.07%Finland - - - - 0.00% 0.00%France - - - - 0.00% 0.00%Germany - - - - 0.00% 0.00%Greece 3 697.2 277.3 2 466.0 2 743.3 66.70% 74.20%Hungary 8 642.3 1 080.3 3 456.4 4 536.7 39.99% 52.49%Ireland - - - - 0.00% 0.00%Italy - - - - 0.00% 0.00%Latvia 1 539.8 192.5 721.7 914.2 46.87% 59.37%Lithuania 2 305.2 288.2 1 502.7 1 790.9 65.19% 77.69%Luxemburg - - - - 0.00% 0.00%Malta 284.2 29.8 118.1 148.0 41.57% 52.07%Netherlands - - - - 0.00% 0.00%Poland 22 387.2 2 328.5 11 132.5 13 461.0 49.73% 60.13%Portugal 3 060.0 229.5 1 970.8 2 200.3 64.41% 71.91%Romania 6 552.4 819.1 1 573.3 2 392.3 24.01% 36.51%Slovakia 3 898.7 409.4 1 432.2 1 841.5 36.73% 47.23%Slovenia 1 411.6 148.2 420.1 568.3 29.76% 40.26%Spain 3 543.2 265.7 2 309.8 2 575.6 65.19% 72.69%Sweden - - - - 0.00% 0.00%United Kingdom - - - - 0.00% 0.00%TOTAL 69 938.5 7 400.5 32 245.1 39 645.6 46.10% 56.69%

7

Opinion on the EU Budget execution 13 February 2014

BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION ERRORS

8

ECA AR 2012- Error Rate evolution

9

ECA AR 2012- Summary

CHAPTER 2012 vs. 2011 OVERALL CONCLUSION

3. Agriculture: Market and direct support

3.8% 0.9%Overdeclarations of land & Administrative errorsWeaknesses in ‘first level checks’ (paying agencies)

4. Rural Development, Environment, Fisheries and Health

7.9% 0.2%

Errors in all Member States and almost all measuresNon respect of eligibility requirementsWeaknesses in ‘first level checks’ (paying agencies)

5. Regional policy; Energy and Transport

6.8% 0.8%

Issues in eligibilityPublic procurementWeaknesses in ‘first level checks’ (managing authorities and intermediate bodies)

6. Employment and social affairs

3.2% 1.0%Issues in eligibilityWeaknesses in ‘first level checks’ (managing authorities and intermediate bodies)

7. External aid, Development and Enlargement

3.3% 2.2% Principal identifiable reason of increase is Court's methodological change

8. Research and other internal policies

3.9% 0.9% Principal identifiable reason of increase is Court's methodological change

9. Administrative and other expenditure

0.0% -0.1%

Statement of assurance (DAS)

4.8% 0.9%Third year increaseOnly a third (0.3) due to methodological change.

10

Protection of EU Budget COM(2013)862– Key figures

11

Protection of EU Budget COM(2013)862– Implementation

12

Protection of EU Budget COM(2013)862– EAGF

13

Protection of EU Budget COM(2013)862– ERDF + ESF

14

Opinion on the EU Budget execution 13 February 2014

LIQUIDITY & FINANCIAL PLANNING PROBLEMS

15

Comparison between the 2007-2013 financial framework and the annual budgeted appropriations

Period 2007-2013

- Gap in Payments

16

Period 2007-2013

- Execution, Back-log - RAL

EUR million

17

EC outstanding budgetary commitments and pre-financing per MFF heading and in years of commitments/payments

Pre2007 - 2012- Outstanding Commitments,- Pre-financings

18

Opinion on the EU Budget execution 13 February 2014

FOCUS ON RESULTS

Getting results from EU Budget

The Chapter is subdivided in three parts and covers performance issues only:

1. Art. 318 TFEU Evaluation Report (two paragraphs only)2. 2012 Annual Activity Reports (DG COMP, DG MOVE, DG MARE)3. ECA Special Reports published in 2012

Main issues in Chapter 10:

•Evaluation Report: ECA acknowledges progress but concludes that it did not provide sufficient, relevant and reliable evidence on what the EU policies have achieved. => NEW KEY INTEREST FOR THE EP (CONT):

MEP THEURER's Report 2013/2172(INI)•AARs: ECA identified weaknesses as regards the formulation of SMART objectives and RACER indicators•Special Reports: ECA repeats some observations made in 2012 SRs, e.g. the lack of availability of data to measure performance

19

ECA AR 2012

- Chapter 10

20

Thank you for your attention

top related