YOU ARE DOWNLOADING DOCUMENT

Please tick the box to continue:

Transcript
Page 1: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

Scholarly Communication & Publishing

Implications for Libraries

Page 2: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

Issues

• Access▫ Formats (multiplicity)

E-books, e-journals, e-etc.

Digital libraries▫ Availability

Remote storage Local browsability

• Preservation

• Scholarly communication▫ Rising costs of

periodicals▫ Role of monographs vs.

periodicals in meeting information needs

▫ Open Access▫ Use patterns

• Interlibrary cooperation

2

Page 3: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

3

Page 4: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

What is “Information”

•Information-as-a-process: the process of being informed

•Information-as-knowledge: That which is imparted when someone becomes informed. Being informed is a state of knowing something. Knowledge is based on belief. A change of knowledge is a change of belief.

•Information-as-thing: physical objects (e.g., data or documents).

4

Page 5: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

5

Information Life-cycle (traditional)

CreationProduction

Retrieval, Access, Use

Storage

Preservation/Archiving (of

What?

PlanningSecurity

Page 6: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

6

Information Life-cycle (digital)

CreationProduction

Retrieval, Access, Use

Storage

Preservation/Archiving (of

What?

Page 7: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

Information Life Cycle

•Creation and dissemination of knowledge different in a digital environment

•Might bypass traditional publishing, dissemination, and announcement steps

•In some cases, information is nearly inseparable from the tools with which it is produced.

7

Page 8: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

Issues of Information Gathering

• Information overload- the digital information universe is expanding at a rate of six-fold per year. In 2007, for the first time data production exceeded storage ability (IDC white paper)

•College students- regardless of information need/purpose- rely on a small set of common resources. Little variation in frequency or order of use (PIL, 2009 report)

•Generally favor brevity, consensus, and currency in sources (PIL, 2009 report)

8

Page 9: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

Issues of Preservation

•Digital formats offer new preservation challenges- shorter shelf life, dependence on ever-changing technology

•Preservation of content and/or preservation of format- the “feel” of the information

9

Page 10: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

10

Page 11: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

11

Page 12: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

12

Page 13: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

13

Page 14: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

Scholarly Communication

• “is the system through which research and other scholarly writings are created, evaluated for quality, disseminated to the scholarly community, and preserved for future use”

• “The system includes both formal means of communication, such as publication in peer-reviewed journals, and informal channels, such as electronic mailing lists.”▫ C&RL News (Sept. 2003),

p. 526

14

Page 15: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

Scholarly Communication

•Five core activities1. Fund research and communication2. Perform research and communicate the

results3. Publish scientific and scholarly works4. Facilitate dissemination, retrieval, and

preservation5. Study publications and apply the

knowledge Economic implications of alternative publishing

models. Jan 2009 available from Educause

15

Page 16: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

Scholarly Communications: Outlets•Subscription or toll access publishing •Open access•Self-archiving/Institutional repositories

•Cost benefit analysis suggests that benefit of OA will outweigh costs, savings could pay for itself.

16

Page 17: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

17

Page 18: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

Open Access• It is “content that is available on the internet

and that can be accessed, read, printed, copied, searched, downloaded, or forwarded free of charge.”

•Those who do the work should own the literature

•Who bears the costs? CLIR Issues (Nov.-Dec. 2004), p. 1

See Serials Review 30(4) (2004), which is a special issue on open access

18

Page 19: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

Johns Hopkins UniversityScholarly Communications Grouphttp://openaccess.jhmi.edu/

•Scholars and researchers both create and consume scholarly information; scholars and researchers add the true value to scholarly communication

•Scholarly communication has become an international, multi-billion dollar business

•Ongoing consolidation of the publishing industry is squeezing out competition

19

Page 20: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

(Continued)• Currently, 121 North American members of the

Association of Research Libraries spend a total of $765M on journal subscriptions.

• During the period 1986-2006, the average journal subscription price increased by more than 10% annually. Over the past 15 years, the price of research journals increased more than 200%.

• Due to rising prices, libraries can offer access to increasingly smaller portions of published literature.

20

Page 21: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

Open Access, Institutional Repositories, and Self-Archiving

21

Page 22: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

SPARC

•A worldwide alliance of research institutions, libraries, and organizations that encourages competition in the scholarly communications market. SPARC introduces new solutions to scientific journal publishing, ▫http://www.arl.org/sparc/home/index.asp?

page=0

22

Page 23: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

SPARC’s Agenda

• Incubation of competitive alternatives to current high-priced commercial journal and digital aggregations.

• Implemented by publisher partnership programs and advisory services that promote competition for authors and buyers.

•Organic Letters (competitor to Tetrahedron Letters) ▫Published by American Chemical Society▫Published over 14,000 pages of original

research▫In 2001 beat its competitor in impact factor

23

Page 24: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

SPARC’s Agenda

•Public advocacy of fundamental changes in the system and the culture of scholarly communication. This encompasses outreach targeted to various stakeholder groups (e.g., librarians, faculty, and editorial boards), as well as ongoing communications and public relations activities that publicize key issues and initiatives.

24

Page 25: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

Others

•DSpace▫MIT’s digital repository to capture, distribute,

and preserve the intellectual output of MIT. •arXiv

▫Pre-print archive, esp. for publications of physics, math, and nonlinear science, etc. Offers: Free access via the Internet; Minimal editorial oversight; comments from

other investigators, both supporting and opposing.

25

Page 26: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

DLIST

•Digital Library for Information Science and Technology, http://dlist.sir/arizona.edu

• It is an Open Access Archive, “a cross-institutional, interdisciplinary repository for information sciences, including Library and Information Science.Its goal “is to create change among LIS faculty by encouraging self-deposit behaviors.”

•Should I deposit my “papers, presentations, articles, and add links on your personal or professional website to DLIST?” YES? NO?

26

Page 27: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

DLIST Update

•Crashed.•Exploring options and alternative•“The resources and metadata are fully

recovered, and we hope to put them back online in a new repository soon.” 12/3/09

27

Page 28: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

Institutional Respositories• Institution-specific open access archives (MIT’s

Dspace)•Meant to enable collaboration, enhance access•Biggest issue is buy-in/uptake by faculty

▫Concerns over copyright▫Lack of time/knowledge of system▫Concerns over impact

•Responses:▫Mandatory self-archiving▫Marketing/promotion ▫Library-assisted archiving

28

Page 29: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

OA/IR: Issues OverviewAdvantages Disadvantages/Challenges

• Free for users▫ More sustainable▫ Helps bridge the digital

divide• Greater access

▫ Opportunities for greater collaboration/cooperation

▫ Could increase impact factors

• Free to use doesn’t mean free to produce▫ Who pays?

• Limited uptake in some fields/schools▫ How to create buy-in

• Dealing with copyright/intellectual property issues

• Questions of quality?

29

Page 30: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

Who controls?

•Publishers•Peer Review•Universities (e.g., control over where

faculty can publish)

30

Page 31: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

Finally

•“Libraries have always been valued for and measured by their collections.” [1] Is this true today as libraries develop more services and collections are not just those physically owned?

▫Now collaboration, consortia, etc.

1 Schmidt (2004, p. 360), from Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services

31

Page 32: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

Ethics

•Code of ethics (ALA)▫Examples: “We provide the highest level of

service to all library users through appropriate and usefully organized resources; … equitable access; and accurate, unbiased and courteous responses to all requests”

▫“We uphold the principles of intellectual freedom and resist all efforts to censor library resources”

32

Page 33: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

•Diversification of collections—all (many different) perspectives

•Protecting confidentiality•Misconduct (falsified research,

plagiarism) represented in collections▫Office of Research Integrity

http://ori.hhs.gov/html/programs/instructresource.asp

33

Page 34: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

Relevant Information Policies

• Information Policy: Statements, directives, laws, etc. that guide operations and set parameters

involve multiple constituencies and stakeholders, with competing interests and expectations

34

Page 35: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

Intellectual Property RightsCopyright

•Copyright is rooted in the Constitution:▫Copyright assigns to the owner of a work

control or exclusive rights to prohibit others from using that work in specific ways without permission and to profit from the sale or performance of the work for a fixed time period

▫Based on a fundamental balancing of the fundamental balancing of the interestsinterests of copyright owners and copyright users

35

Page 36: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

Fair Use•Copyright involves exclusive rights, which

constitute a monopoly and include reproduction, distribution, adaptation, public performance, and public display. However, these rights are restricted to allow limited uses of the material, particularly of the use offers societal benefits. These exceptions or limitations collectively comprise “fair use”

36

Page 37: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

Criteria for Determining Fair Use

• Purpose or character of use

• Nature of the work

• Amount of the material that is used

• Impact on the market

37

Page 38: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

•Works may be copyrighted when they are fixed in a tangible medium of expression. A test of copyright protection is the requirement that the work demonstrate a level of “originality,” something more than a “merely trivial variation” and more than the product of the “sweat of brow”

38

Page 39: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

Public Domain• Works not protected by

copyright• Materials that have

reached the time limit of copyright protection

• Publications of the U.S. government

39

Page 40: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

Impact of Digital Technologies

•They are changing information creation, distribution, use, and preservation

•They are redefining the “market,”ownership, and sales. Example, Napster and CD/DVD burners

40

Page 41: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

Fundamental Questions

•How does copyright affect scholarly communication presented in book and journal article form?

•How does the fundamental interest of the library community coincide with other groups?

•How do we forge coalitions that will influence government policies?

▫ For other questions, see James G. Neal, “Copyright Is Dead … Long Live Copyright,” American Libraries 33 (December 2002): 48-51

41

Page 42: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)• Encouraging countries to work with the World

Trade Organization to establish new rules covering international trade, including intellectual property

▫ Application to databases (licensing agreements)

▫ Impetus = digital communication and global economics

▫ Some Other rules/players: General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs, European Union, and national governments. Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act added 20 years to copyright protection, thereby inhibiting material entering the public domain

42

Page 43: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

Antagonists • Content owners

▫ Publishers▫ Artists/authors▫ Universities

• Society: Public▫ Libraries▫ Others

43

Page 44: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

Overview of Policy Issues• Peter Hernon, Harold C. Relyea, Robert E.

Dugan, and Joan Cheverie, United States Government Information (Libraries Unlimited, 2002)

▫Chapter 12, “Intellectual Property”

44

Page 45: Scholarly Communication & Publishing Implications for Libraries.

Key Resources

•Center for Intellectual Property and Copyright in the Digital Environment, www.umuc.edu/odell/cip/cip.html

•Electronic Freedom Foundation, www.eff.org•Creative Commons,

www.creativecommons.org•Conference on the Public Domain,

www.law.duke.edu/pd/•Progress and Freedom Foundation,

www.pff.org

45


Related Documents