YOU ARE DOWNLOADING DOCUMENT

Please tick the box to continue:

Transcript
Page 1: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 1

\CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-PDD)

Version 03 - in effect as of: 28 July 2006

CONTENTS

A. General description of project activity B. Application of a baseline and monitoring methodology C. Duration of the project activity / crediting period D. Environmental impacts E. Stakeholders’ comments

Annexes

Annex 1: Contact information on participants in the project activity Annex 2: Information regarding public funding Annex 3: Baseline information

Annex 4: Monitoring plan

Page 2: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 2

SECTION A. General description of project activity

A.1. Title of the project activity:

Title of project activity: Waste Heat Recovery projects for gas turbine generators CDM document version No: 1

Date of the CDM document: 4/11/2009

A.2. Description of the project activity:

The project of waste heat recovery for GTG aims to reduce the GHG generated from the fuel gas

burning in the hot oil heaters by partially stopping oil heaters (heat generators) operations and

utilize the heat generated from the flue gases of GTGs to heat the hot oil instead, in order to obtain

the heat duties required by heat consumers (Refer to the project boundaries for the list of heat

consumers).

The heating duty for the ELNG facilities is generated by hot oil heaters (heat generators). The

required heat is obtained by burning of fuel gas in the hot oil heaters.

The base line scenario is the same as the scenario existing prior to the start of implementation of

the project activity (refer to selection of base line scenario).

Main environmental benefits

The main environmental benefit from the project activity arises from the replacement /

Displacement of an amount of heat energy generated by operation of the existing 4 oil heaters.

The project activity displaces energy from fossil fuels based heat generation of the company and

hence reduces CO2 emission.

The heaters capacity is 154.96 GJ/hr while the new heat capacity of the WHR is 120 GJ/hr.

The source of heat of the Project activity comes from the temperature of flue gases emitted from

GTG, in the absence of the project activity; the heat accompanied with the flue gases would release

to atmosphere. Thus, save environment from thermal pollution.

It is worth mentioning that the difference in heat duties between the existing system and the

proposed WHR shall be compensated by the one or two oil heater (s) partial operation (for short

time of the year) to meet the remaining heat duty requirements of the LNG facilities.

The total CO2 emission reduction for the entire crediting period of 10 years has been calculated as

295, 50 tonne CO2equivalent.

Page 3: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 3

Another benefit other than being reduction of CO2 emissions are Sustainable development through

better energy efficiency and improvement of local environment.

The project activity will lead to sustainable development and promote sustainable Industrial growth

by conserving natural resources and preventing the thermal impact even though no such statutory

requirement exists in Egypt.

The project is the first submitted project of the Oil/Gas sector in Egypt which will encourage other

Oil/Gas companies to understand and apply CDM.

Social benefit

The proposed project will have indirect positive impact on society, as it is help to conserves the future

generation’s right of utilizing the natural resources by optimizing the usage of natural resources.

The project activity increases the indirect employment due to the project activities for skilled manpower

and Professionals.

In the same time the implementation of the CDM project activities by ELNG internal resources as part of

a capacity building project within ELNG to generate more projects that are environmental friendly and

promote a sustainable development culture inside the company. The project is a step towards improve

energy efficiency and achieve near-zero waste initiatives in Egyptian LNG facilities.

Economical Benefits

The proposed project aims to install 4 waste heat recovery units for ELNG gas turbine generators which

facilitate to stop some of the plant oil heaters; this will reduce fuel consumption which maximizes the

quantity of gas liquefied /year and reduce the time required to liquefy the contracted amount of gas along

the project life time.

A.3. Project participants:

Name of Party involved

(host) indicates a Host

Party)

Private and/or public entity(ies)

Project participants (as applicable)

Kindly indicate if the Party

involved wishes to be

considered as project

participant (Yes/No)

Egypt Ministry of State for Environmental Affaires

Egyptian LNG – Private entity No

A.4. Technical description of the project activity:

Page 4: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 4

A.4.1. Location of the project activity:

A.4.1.1. Host Party(ies):

>> EGYPT

A.4.1.2. Region/State/Province etc.:

>>El Beheria Govenerrnate,

A.4.1.3. City/Town/Community etc.:

>> IDKU

A.4.1.4. Details of physical location, including information allowing the

unique identification of this project activity (maximum one page):

>>>>The Egyptian LNG (ELNG) is a tolling facility that is liquefy natural gas and located 31°20'52"N & 30°19'14"E, 3 km from the town of Idku and 40 km east of Alexandria on the Egyptian Mediterranean Coast and on the east side of Abu Qir bay. The topography for the general area is flat with little relief except for isolated dunes along the coastline. The proposed project will be located inside Egyptian LNG facility.

Map (1): Geographical location of the project

A.4.2. Category(ies) of project activity:

Sectoral Scope Category 4 (Manufacturing industries)

The project activity may be principally categorized in category – 4 Energy Industries (Manufacturing

industries) as per Scope of Projects activities enlisted in the “list of sectoral scopes and approved base line and

monitoring “methodologies” on the website of UNFCCC for accreditation of “Designated operational

Entities”.

A.4.3. Technology to be employed by the project activity:

>> Technology to be employed

Page 5: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 5

Natural gas liquefaction process is carried out in 2 parallel identical production trains. Once

liquefied, LNG takes up about one six-hundredth of the space it occupied in its gaseous form,

making it easier to store and transport over long distances.

The LNG is stored at slightly above atmospheric pressure in double wall cryogenic LNG tanks and

is exported as a liquid through LNG tankers.

ELNG electric power generation system consists of four gas turbine generators (GTGs). Each GTG

is rated at 14.5 MW the flue gases flow from GTG is around 63 kg/s with temperature around 356

°C. The operating philosophy of GTG in the Egyptian LNG plant is to operate three out of four

GTGs to provide the required electricity , the forth GTG is on standby as backup in case of one

GTG fails.

The ELNG facilities were originally designed to operate with 4 oil heaters. The project aims to

reduce the GHG generated from the fuel gas burning of the 4 oil heaters existing in the LNG.

Hot oil system is a closed loop circulation system designed to supply the process heating duties for

the LNG plant hot oil consumers (heat consumers). Refer to the project boundaries for the list of

consumers. Heat consumers are equipments required to have certain temperature in order to

maintain its functions inside the LNG liquefaction factory.

The heat energy requirement of the consumers in the project boundary is (185.902 GJ/hr) for mode is

divided as follow: a. Feed Gas Heater (E-1106 ) is equal to 35 GJ/hr ( mode 1 only)

a. Solvent Reclaimer (E-1205) is equal to 0.921 GJ/hr

b. Regeneration Reboiler (E-1204) is equal to 36.8 GJ/hr

c. NGL Recovery Column Reboiler (E-1702) is equal to 17.69 GJ/hr

d. Make up Fuel Gas Heater (E-2201) is equal to 3.06 GJ/hr

Egyptian LNG consist of 2 identical liquefaction production unit, each production unit has a hot oil

System contains two parallel hot oil heaters, each heater is designed to provide 50 % of the

production train duty, thus the number of oil heaters in the ELNG facility is 4 heaters. The fuel gas

is supplied to the heaters from low pressure fuel gas system.

Hot oil ((Mobiletherm 605 thermal transfer fluid) is heated in the hot oil heaters from an inlet

temperature 150°C to outlet temperature 246°C. outlet hot oil temperature is directly proportional to

the fuel gas supply. Cold Hot oil from consumers is returned back to the hot oil surge drum where

the cycle starts again.

Page 6: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 6

The waste heat recovery (WHRU) unit is designed to utilize heat from the exhaust flue gases of gas

turbine generators (GTGs) (refer to A.2. for more details about GTG’s) and further used to heat the

hot oil.

The Waste heat recovery units will be retrofitted directly to the exhaust system of the four GTGs to

heat the hot oil up to the intended temperature 247°C to achieve the following goals:

• Save the energy lost with GTGs’ exhaust gases.

• Decrease the Green House Gases (GHG) emissions.

• Solve problem of the lack of hot oil duty in winter time.

• Increase plant Thermal Efficiency by saving the hot oil heaters fuel gas.

The Determination of the operation philosophy of the WHRU and oil heaters depends on two

factors as follow:

1. Operation post 2012 where the feed gas temperature increased due to the implementation of

new compression station in the upstream plant which will lead to increase the temperature

of the feed gas above the current temperature thus the required heat duty of the plant will be

much lower.

2. Operation in winter time (4 months of the year) and summer time (8 months of the year) as

the required heat duties depend on the ambient temperature.

The mode of operation (different operation philosophy) of the heat generators (WHRU and hot oil

heaters) after the project activity is as follow:

1. Mode 1: post WHRU start up until 2012. (3 WHRU + 2 fired heaters)

In this mode of operation, one of the liquefaction trains will use 3 WHRU.the other train is

operated with two fired heaters.

2. Mode 2: post 2012 until 2025, in winter time. (3 WHRU + 1 Oil Heater)

In this mode of operation, one of the liquefaction trains will use one WHRU and one fired

heater, the other train will use two WHRU.

3. Mode 3: : After 2012 until 2025, in summer time.( 3 WHRU + no Oil Heater

operation)

In this mode of operation, one of the liquefaction trains will use one WHRU; the other

train will work with two WHRU.

Page 7: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 7

By stopping burning of fuel gas in oil heaters, fuel gas is saved and converted to LNG (liquefied

natural gas).

In the absence of the project activity the flue gases temperature (waste heat) will released to

atmosphere and the heat duties required to heat the heat consumers in the LNG plant is gained by

the 4 oil heaters. The project aims to reduce this amount of CO2equivalent/year as much as possible.

TYPE ELNG Code MANUFACTURE MODEL DESIGN CAPACITY ENERGEY SOURCE

Hot oil heater 1H-3401A/B Uniflux Exotherm N/A 38.74 GJ/hr Fuel Gas

Gas turbine TG-3101/2/3/4 Siemens SGT 500 14.5 MW Fuel Gas

Waste heat recovery W-3401A/B/C/D N/A N/A 40 GJ/hr Flue Gases

Table 1 - Equipment details

The simplified flow diagram is shown below for the new WHRU and existing oil heaters:

Fig 1 Process flow diagram of one waste heat recovery unit

WHRU

Hot oil

heater

Page 8: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 8

Figure 2 GTGs and Hot Oil Heaters location

A.4.4. Estimated amount of emission reductions over the chosen crediting period:

A.4.5. Public funding of the project activity:

Year

Estimation of emission reductions

(Tonnes of CO2e)

2011 34111

2012 68222

2013 68222

2014 68222

2015 68222

2016 68222

2017 68222

2018 68222

2019 68222

2020 68222 Annual average over the crediting period of estimated reductions (tonnes of CO2e)

648109

Annual Average emission per year of estimated CO2e emission reduction in tones of CO2eq

64810

GTGs

Hot Oil Heater

Hot Oil Heater

Train 1

Train 2

Page 9: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 9

>>There is no public funding available to the project activity from parties included in Annex 1.

Page 10: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 10

SECTION B. Application of a baseline and monitoring methodology

B.1. Title and reference of the approved baseline and monitoring methodology applied to the

project activity:

Reference: Approved consolidated baseline and monitoring methodology ACM0012. Ver3.2

Title: “Consolidated baseline methodology for GHG emission reductions from waste energy recovery

projects”

And “Tool for the demonstration and assessment of additionality” (Version 05.2)

( B.2. Justification of the choice of the methodology and why it is applicable to the project

activity:

As stated in the “Consolidated baseline methodology for GHG emission reductions from waste

energy recovery projects”, “the consolidated methodology is for all the waste heat in an identified

WECM (Waste Energy Carrying Medium) stream/s that will be utilized in the project activity that

would be released to atmosphere in the absence of the project activity at the existing facilities”. The

waste heat is an energy source for generation of heat in element process (e.g. hot oil).

The WHRU is the aimed to utilize the waste energy in the form of waste heat generated from the

flue gases of GTGs gas turbine generators (WECM). This waste heat will be used to heat one of

the Egyptian LNG heat element process (i.e.: hot oil), instead of obtaining the same energy

from combustion of fuel gas in the hot oil heaters.

The waste heat generated from flue gases (WECM) will be utilized to heat hot oil.

The table below provides justification to the applicability criteria’s as per ACM0012, version 03.2.

Page 11: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 11

ACM0012 applicability criteria Justification

1 Type-1: All the waste energy in identified WECM streams that will be utilized in the project activity, is, or would be flared or released to atmosphere in the absence of the project activity at the existing or new facility. The waste energy is an energy source for:

• Cogeneration; or

• Generation of electricity; or

• Direct use as process heat source; or

• For generation of heat in element process (e.g. steam, hot water, hot oil, hot air);

• Or for generation of mechanical energy.

The proposed project activity is applied

under Type-1 waste energy project, where

(waste heat) was released to atmosphere in

absence of the project activity in the existing

facility.

Waste energy is an energy source for

generation of heat in element process (hot

oil).

2 If the project activity is based on the use of waste

pressure to generate electricity, electricity generated

using waste pressure should be measurable;

The project does not utilize waste pressure

energy, thus this criteria is not applicable.

3 Energy generated in the project activity may be used

within the industrial facility or exported from the

industrial facility;

The energy (heated hot oil) generated is used

within the industrial facility.

4 The electricity generated in the project activity may be

exported to the grid or used for captive purposes;

The project does not generate electricity and

therefore this criteria is not applicable 5 Energy in the project activity can be generated by the

owner of the industrial facility producing the waste

energy or by a third party within the industrial facility;

Energy in the project activity is generated by

the (ELNG) within the industrial facility.

6 Regulations do not constrain the industrial facility that

generates waste energy from using fossil fuels prior to

the implementation of the project activity;

There are no regulations that constrain the

industrial facility from using fossil fuel prior

to the implementation of the project activity. 7 The methodology covers both new and existing facilities.

For existing facilities, the methodology applies to

existing capacity. If capacity expansion is planned, the

added capacity must be treated as a new facility;

The application covers the ELNG facility

with the existing capacity. No added capacity

expansion is planned.

8 The emission reductions are claimed by the generator of

energy using waste energy.

The emission reduction will be claimed by

generator alone. 9 In cases where the energy is exported to other

facilities, an official agreement exists between the owners

of the project energy generation plant (henceforth

referred to as generator, unless specified otherwise) with

the recipient plant(s) that the emission reductions would

not be claimed by recipient plant(s) for using a zero-

emission energy source;

The project activity does not export energy to

any other facility(s).

10 For those facilities and recipients included in the project

boundary, that prior to implementation of the project

activity (current situation) generated energy on-site

(sources of energy in the baseline), the credits can be

claimed for minimum of the following time periods:

• The remaining lifetime of equipments currently

being used; and

• Credit period.

The remaining lifetime of generation

equipments (GTGs) currently (until 2025) is

greater than CDM crediting period (until

2019).1,2

Page 12: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 12

11 Waste energy that is released under abnormal operation

(for example, emergencies, shut down) of the plant shall

not be accounted for.

The project activity does not consider waste

energy that is released under abnormal

operation.

The proposed project activity meets all the applicability conditions in ACM0012, version 03.2.

B.3. Description of the sources and gases included in the project boundary:

The geographical extent project boundary shall include the following:

a. The hot oil heaters where process heat in the element process (hot oil) energy is generated

(generator of process heat).

b. WECM which is the flue gases of GTG that provide auxiliary heat (from exhaust) to the

waste heat recovery process (WHRU) is included within the project boundary; and

c. The process heat consumers in the Egyptian LNG plant where the process heat in the

element process energy used. The process heat consumers are as follow:

a. Feed Gas Heater (E-1106 ) b. Solvent Reclaimer (E-1205) c. Regeneration Reboiler (E-1204) d. NGL Recovery Column Reboiler (E-1702) e. Make Up Fuel Gas Heater (E-2201)

Figure (2) illustrate the spatial extent of the project boundary comprises from the waste heat

sources which is the GTG That provides auxiliary heat to the waste heat recovery units (WHRU)

(project activity), and the specific heat consumers in the Egyptian LNG plant that will be

connected physically to the waste energy recovery unit and is already connected to the existing

generator of process heat (hot oil heaters)

Overview of emission sources included in or excluded from the project boundary is provided in

Table 1.

Figure B.3.1 and Figure B.3.2 illustrates Baseline scenario and project boundary.

Page 13: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 13

Figure 1 existing hot oil heaters system simple flow diagram

Figure 2 waste heat recovery unit simple flow diagram

Page 14: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 14

Ba

seli

ne

Source Gas Included?

Justification / Explanation

Electricity generation, grid captive source

CO2 Excluded 1. Electricity generation is GTG

is out of the project boundary 2. emissions from power

generation will not change by the project activities

CH4 Excluded

N2O Excluded

Fossil fuel consumption for thermal energy

CO2 Included Main emission source

CH4 Excluded Excluded for simplification

N2O Excluded Excluded for simplification

Fossil fuel consumption in cogeneration plant

CO2 Excluded No cogeneration plant exist

CH4 Excluded No cogeneration plant exist

N2O Excluded No cogeneration plant exist

Baseline emissions from generation of steam used in the flaring process, if any

CO2 Excluded No steam is used in the flaring processes

CH4 Excluded No steam is used in the flaring processes

N2O Excluded No steam is used in the flaring processes

Pro

ject

act

ivit

y

Supplemental fossil fuel consumption at the project plant

CO2 Excluded No supplemental fossil fuel will be used

CH4 Excluded No supplemental fossil fuel will be used

N2O Excluded No supplemental fossil fuel will be used

Supplemental electricity

CO2 Excluded No supplemental electricity will be used

CH4 Excluded No supplemental electricity will be used

N2O Excluded No supplemental electricity will be used

Electricity import to replace captive electricity, which was generated using waste gas in absence of project activity

CO2 Included Waste heat recovery will not used to produce electricity

CH4 Excluded Waste heat recovery will not used to produce electricity

N2O Excluded Waste heat recovery will not used to produce electricity

Project emissions from cleaning of gas

CO2 Excluded No cleaning activity is required for the waste heat recovery unit.

CH4 Excluded

N2O Excluded

Table 2: Summary of gases and sources included in the project boundary

Page 15: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 15

B.4. Description of how the baseline scenario is identified and description of the identified

baseline scenario:

The baseline scenario is identified as the most plausible baseline scenario among all realistic and credible

alternative(s). Realistic and credible alternatives should be determined for:

• Waste energy use in the absence of the project activity; and

There is no waste energy-use in the project boundary all waste energy from the operation of the

hot oil heaters and the gas turbine generators (GTG’s) are emitted to atmosphere with out any

utilization of any kind.

• Power generation in the absence of the project activity;

The power generation in Egyptian LNG is not relevant to the activities associated with the

project, except that the WHRUs is directly (physically) connected to the GTG which is the power

generation equipments in Egyptian LNG. The utilizing of flue gases as a source of heat in the

waste heat recovery unit will decrease the thermal pollutions emitted from the GTG as the

temperature of flue gases is estimated to decrease from 356° C to 150 ° C.

• Heat generation in the absence of the project activity; and

The heat generated from the equipments with in the project boundary is summarized as follow:

1. Heat generated from hot oil heaters equal to 154.96 GJ/hr.

2. Heat generated from gas turbine generators as the temperature of flue gases is equal to

(120 GJ/hr).

• Mechanical energy generation in the absence of the project activity.

The WHRU will not generate any mechanical energy; there is no change in the mechanical

energy with the implementation of the project activities.

Multiple sub-systems generating energy in the project activity scenario

In determining the baseline scenario, existing hot oil system provide an output more than the combined

output of all WHRU that will be installed on the exhaust stack of the GTGs in the project activity

scenario. Thus an operation of one oil heater in addition to the operations of 3 WHRU is required during

winter time (mode 3 operation) to meet the heat duties required during that time (the highest required

heat case scenario for the LNG plant)

The above mentioned baseline operations is already existing and approved by the environmental

authority of Egypt. The fuel source utilized is natural gas. Therefore the alternatives as identified for the

project activity should provide the same heat, energy output as in the project activity scenario and should

include the alternate use of the waste energy utilized in the project activity.

Page 16: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 16

Step 1: Define the most plausible baseline scenario for the generation of heat using the following

baseline options and combinations

For the use of waste heat, the realistic and credible alternative(s) is to utilize WECM that is released to

the atmosphere (as combustion products).

The facility where the waste energy is generated, consumed and produced is Egyptian LNG

As per the ACM-12, the following facilities shall be considered while determining the baseline option:

1. For the industrial facility where the waste energy is generated; 2. For the facility where the energy is produced; and 3. For the facility where the energy is consumed.

The energy generator, the waste energy generator and recipient plant are the same which is

Egyptian LNG. For the use of waste energy, the realistic and credible alternative(s) is, inter alia:

W1: WECM is directly vented to atmosphere without incineration or waste heat is released to the

atmosphere;

The current practice is that WECM is flue gases which are a product of burning, The WECM is not

passed through a process before it vented to atmosphere. Thus, this option is one of the credible and

realistic baseline scenarios for the project participants.

W2: WECM is released to the atmosphere (for example after incineration) or waste heat is released to

the atmosphere;

The current practice is that WECM is flue gases which are a product of burning. The WECM is not

passed through a process before it vented to atmosphere.. Thus, this option is not one of the credible and

realistic baseline scenarios for the project participants.

W3: Waste energy is sold as an energy source;

Currently there is no waste energy sold as an energy source inside ELNG facilities, Transportation of

flue gases waste heat to an energy consumer out side is not technically and financially possible option.

The technical team of the project did not identify even one option to sell, in the future, the flue gases as

energy source. Thus, this option is not a credible and realistic baseline scenario for the project

participant.

Page 17: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 17

W4 Waste energy is used for meeting energy demand;

There is no waste energy used to meet the energy demand of ELNG facility and all waste heat from GTG

is directly vented to atmosphere Thus, it cannot be considered as a credible and realistic baseline

scenario.

W5: A portion of the waste gas produced at the facility is captured and used for captive electricity

generation, while the rest of the waste gas produced at the facility is vented/flared;

There is no waste gas captured inside ELNG facility and all waste heat from GTG is directly vented to

atmosphere Thus, it cannot be considered as a credible and realistic baseline scenario.

W6: All the waste gas produced at the industrial facility is captured and used for export electricity

generation.

There is no waste gas captured inside ELNG facility and GTGs which is used in power generation is not

directly connected to the national electrical grid. Thus, this option is not a credible and realistic

alternative scenario.

From the above, the likely baseline scenario for the WECM (waste flue gases from GTG’S) is option W2

Other alternative mentioned in the approved consolidated methodology were investigated and all (except

W2) were excluded.

For heat generation, realistic and credible alternative(s) includes, inter alia:

H1: Proposed project activity is not undertaken as a CDM project activity;

The financial feasibility shows that this option is not financially viable. The same has been discussed in

section B5. Thus, this option is not a credible and realistic baseline scenario for the project participant.

H2: On-site or off-site existing/new fossil fuel based cogeneration plant;

Reference to the ACM12, This option is only available for type 2 projects. The project activity is a type 1

project as indicated in section B2, thus, this option is not a credible and realistic baseline scenario for the

project participant.

Page 18: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 18

H3: On-site or off-site existing/new renewable energy based cogeneration plant;

Reference to the ACM12, This option is only available for type 2 projects. The project activity is a type 1

project as indicated in section B2, thus, this option is not a credible and realistic baseline scenario for the

project participant.

H4: An existing or new fossil fuel based oil heaters (oil heaters used instead of boilers);

There is an existing fossil fuel based oil heaters plant within the project boundary. The existing scenario

is business as usual scenario where existing or new fossil fuel based oil heaters is meeting heat

requirements of heat consumers inside LNG plant. Thus, this option is a credible and realistic alternative

scenario.

H5: An existing or new renewable energy or other waste energy based boilers;

As Per the ACM 12, this is not applicable for type 2 project.

H6: Any other source such as district heat;

There is no other source for heat generation. Thus, this option is not a credible and realistic alternative

scenario.

H7: Other heat generation technologies;

No other heat generation technologies available for the project activity, No potential hydro power

generation facilities around the sites and there are no wave energy facilities near by the manufacturing

facility. In addition to the previous, all renewable energy mentioned have a very high fluctuations and

seasonal variation of the maximum output, which will severely impact the reliability and availability of

the ELNG plant.

Solar energy is available in Egypt; however installation of new solar turbines to produce electricity a

long with a WHRU to produce the required heat duty is not financially feasible and will have a very high

capital cost.

Reference to the above, alternative H7 is not a credible and realistic alternative scenario.

H8: steam/Process heat generation from waste energy, but with lower efficiency;

There is no steam generation within the project boundary. The required heat energy and the design

efficiency of new proposed waste heat recovery is relative to the waste heat energy emitted from the

GTG’s. In addition, a production of heat energy with lower efficiency will not generate the required heat

energy by the consumers of ELNG. Thus, this option is not a credible and realistic alternative scenario.

H9: Cogeneration with waste energy, but at a lower efficiency.

The required heat energy and the design efficiency of new proposed waste heat recovery is relative to the

waste heat energy emitted from the GTG’s. In addition, a production of heat energy with lower efficiency

Page 19: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 19

will not generate the required heat energy by the consumers of ELNG. Thus, this option is not a credible

and realistic alternative scenario.

From the above, the likely baseline scenario of heat generation for the WECM (waste flue gases from

GTG’S) is option H4 Other alternative mentioned in the approved consolidated methodology were

investigated and all (except H4) were excluded.

All the above baseline options were developed based on various combinations of baseline options.

Exclusion of some baseline options is justified with documented evidence.

Step 2: Identify the fuel for the baseline choice of energy source taking into account the national

and/or sectoral policies as applicable

The baseline fuel is natural gas which is available in abundance in Egypt and there is no supply

constraint, and there is contract to provide ELNG with a 1.8 trillion SCF of natural gas until 2025.

Step 3: Step 2 and/or Step 3 of the latest approved version of the “Tool for the demonstration and

assessment of additionality”

To identify the most plausible baseline scenario, both Step 2 and Step 3 of the “Tool for the

demonstration and assessment of additionality” has been used for the alternatives identified in Step 1

above. The economic attractiveness of each option is evaluated with respect to the current situation and

each option is evaluated for a common set of barriers. The outcome of this analysis is:

From the baseline analysis, the only credible and plausible alternative that remains after evaluation is

W2; Continuation of current practice by releasing waste energy to atmosphere and Scenario H4 where

existing hot oil heaters produces the heat is the most reasonable choices as Baseline Scenario.

Step 4: If more than one credible and plausible alternative scenario remain, the alternative with the

lowest baseline emissions shall be considered as the most likely baseline scenario

As per the above discussion as there is only one credible / plausible alternative that remains at this stage of assessment, the alternative (H4) is identified as the baseline scenario for the project activities. As per the methodology, scenario 1 is chosen as the baseline option

Page 20: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 20

Baseline options and scenario applicable to the project activities

Scenario Baseline options Description of the situation

Waste energy Heat energy

1 W2 H4 Waste heat energy from GTG’s is directly vented to atmosphere and is not passed through a process before it vented to atmosphere (waste flue gases is released to the atmosphere). The most plausible credible option for heat generation is an existing fossil fuel based oil heaters plant within the project boundary.

Table 4: Combinations of baseline options and scenarios applicable to this methodology

B.5. Description of how the anthropogenic emissions of GHG by sources are reduced below

those that would have occurred in the absence of the registered CDM project activity (assessment

and demonstration of additionality):

As per the decision 17/CP.7 and 18/CP.9 a CDM activity is additional, if anthropogenic emissions of

GHGs by sources are reduced below those that would have occurred in the absence of registered project

activity. The tool for the demonstrations and assessment of additionality (version-05.2) approved at the

39th meeting of CDM executive board requires the project participant to demonstrate and assess

additionality, as per the steps given below. In steps A to D.

After studying realistic and credible alternatives available to project activity in B.2, it is proved that the

generation of heat from oil heaters using fuel gas is the baseline scenario.

Egyptian LNG hereby proceeds to establish the additionality of proposed project activity using “the tool

for the demonstration and assessment of additionality” (version-05.2) of 39th meeting of CDM executive

board.

All selected additionality tool indicators showed that the project activity faces financial, technology and

investment barriers and in the absence of CDM finance these barriers would have adverse impact in

implementation of the project activity.

The base line methodology outlines steps to demonstrate additionality as follow:

Step A: Identification of alternative to project activity in consistent with the mandatory laws and

regulations.

Identify realistic and credible alternatives including:

Step A. 1: Proposed activity undertaken without being registered as a CDM project activity.

The project activity faces financial, technology and investment barriers and in the absence of CDM

finance these barriers would have adverse impact in implementation of the project activity.

Page 21: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 21

Step A. 2: All other plausible and credible alternative

No other plausible and credible alternative

Step A. 3: continuations of the current situations

In absence of the proposed project activity Egyptian LNG would meet the complete heat requirement by

heat consumers from natural gas based hot oil heaters and emit the GHG into atmosphere in the same

time, gas turbine generators will emit waste heat to atmosphere (i.e.: business as usual).

Enforcement of applicable laws and regulations:

All the identified realistic and credible alternative scenarios are in compliance with current legal and

regulatory requirements of the country and EB decision on national and /or sectoral Policies and

regulation.

There is no law or other requirement to reduce/control the GHG and waste heat emissions due to the

process of liquefaction of natural gas in Egypt.

Step B: (or step 2 of the additionality tool); Investment analysis to determine that the project activity is

not the most or financially attractive.

Sub-step 2a. Determine appropriate analysis method

A simple cost analysis (Option I of the Additionality tool) will not be appropriate for assessing

investment analysis of this project as The project activity generates the economic benefits due to energy

saving (i.e.; saving in Natural gas quantities previously used in auxiliary firing in hot oil heaters and

converted to the production trains without increasing of the design or rated capacity of the LNG plant

which will lead to increase bonus fees to ELNG).

Then, Option II (the investment comparison analysis) or Option III (the benchmark analysis) of the

additionality tool should be used. ELNG select Option II

Sub-step 2b: Option II. Apply investment comparison analysis

The most suitable analysis method for the project type and decision-making context is calculation of

NPV.

Net Present Value (NPV) used to assess the financial feasibility of the project activities.

Sub-step 2c. Calculation and comparison of financial indicators

The amount LNG (liquefied natural gas) is less than the fuel saved where the process of converting of

natural gas to liquefied natural gas involves some losses which depend on some factors such as plant

availability, thermal efficiency and processing losses.

1. Plant availability

2. Thermal efficiency

3. Processing losses

Page 22: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 22

The lifetime of the project activity is estimated by the original equipment manufacture which is 20 years.

However, the remaining lifetime of the ELNG facility is 16 years only. Therefore IRR model is

ascertained till 2025 considering energy savings and CDM revenue inflow start in year 2011 and end in

year 2019.

The financial/economic analysis was based on parameters that are standard in the market, considering the

specific characteristics of the project type such as plant availability and thermal efficiency and LNG

processing losses.

At the time when the investment decision was made, ELNG has an actual price quotation for the waste

heat recovery unit. Thus no major change in the cost estimation is expected from the time of issuing this

PDD.

Confidential Note:

Please note that the economics referencing the Processing Fee should be treated as confidential information as it is based on the project documents between the Train Users and the Train Companies. The below paragraph will explain the investment analysis worksheet:

1. Summary of cost estimation:

Below is the summary for all costs associated with the WHR project in US $: a. Engineering cost actual $500,000.

b. Main unit is estimated to cost $5,150,000, which are the sum of:

i. The main unit is estimated to cost $5,000,000 based on quotations received from

potential suppliers;

ii. $150,000 an estimate for transportation cost, and

iii. Materials cost of $1,066,593 based on the prices of recent similar orders; piping

$410,695, valves $326,180 electrical $35,504, and instrumentation $ 294,214.

iv. Civil works are estimated to value $623,637 consistent of $350,000 for

foundation and $273,637 for steel structure based on a recent offer.

v. An Installation contract which includes scaffold and main unit installation

should cost $813,089 based on recent offers/cost index.

The total estimated CAPEX totals $8,153,319 +/- 20% accuracy.

Operating & Maintenance (O&M) cost is estimated to be 2.5% of capital cost which is $203,833.

Total cost is therefore the sum of CAPEX and O&M, which equals $8,560,984.

2. Final sheet:

The economic scenarios presented demonstrate three different cases/scenarios that ELNG faces regarding

this project:

Page 23: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 23

a. The Do Nothing – Baseline Case:

In this scenario ELNG decides not to pursue the project to reduce carbon emission with zero capital

investment (no Capital nor operating costs). The only cash flow is the positive cash flow of the

Processing Fee.

The Processing Fee is the fee paid by the Train Users (Sellers) to the Train Companies for liquefaction

services. Part of the Processing Fee, ELNG gets compensation for fail days, mainly days when the Sellers

do not deliver full gas to the Train Cos.

Assuming 10.98 fail days flat over the 15 years of ELNG life time, the NPV of this scenario (discounted

at the rate of 4% from Reuters 15 year T-Bonds) is $ 70,178,587

b. ELNG WHR Case:

This case assumes that ELNG starts the Waste Heat Recovery (WHR) units and proceeds with the project

in 2011. The capital investment is $8,153,319, as explained in detail in the (I-Summary of Cost Sheet),

for the first year. For the operating cost, it is assumed that O&M would be 2.5% of the initial capital cost

203,833.No other operating cost is assumed.

The impact of the WHR project is that it will enhance the plant efficiency by enabling the plant to

produce more LNG from the same amount of feed gas, in the same time will reduce GHG emissions. This

is achieved by burning less of the gas as fuel gas to generate heat.

ELNG will produce slightly more LNG which will attract a processing fee; the actual production

component will be higher if the plant is more efficient as the outset of this project.

The assumption in this case is that the fail day was the same as in the base case.

The NPV of this scenario (discounted at the rate of 4% from Reuters 15 year T-Bonds) over 15 years is

$67,322,050

c. WHR without CDM revenues

The difference between what ELNG would normally get in the “Do Nothing” case and the second case

“WHR Case” should be the determinant factor here. The delta between case 1 & 2 is actually negative -

$2,856,527 which means that financially, ELNG is better off not going on with the project since it means

additional costs incurred.

d. WHR with CDM revenues

The difference between what ELNG would normally get in the “Do Nothing” case and the second case

“WHR Case” adding the CDM revenues as constant value equal to $ 300,000 per year for the first two

years and $ 650,000 per year for the remaining 8 years of the 10 years registering period.

The delta between case 1 & 2 is positive $1,947,485 which means that financially, ELNG is better going

on with the project.

Page 24: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 24

Outcome of step 2:

Based on the investment analysis it could be concluded that the project activity is unlikely to be the

financially attractive without CDM benefits.

Step C: Barrier analysis.

As per the tool for the demonstrations and assessment of additionality (version-05.2) approved at the 39th

meeting of CDM executive board requires the project participant to demonstrate and assess additionality,

step C is not required after implementation of step B. however, ELNG decide to go through the barrier

analysis because the overall integrity of / and the inherent safety of the type of technology used in the

project activities were discussed during the detailed engineering phase of the project and during

HAZOP3.

Sub-step 3b. Show that the identified barriers would not prevent the implementation of at least one of

the alternatives (except the proposed project activity).

The only realistic alternative to the proposed CDM project activity is the continuation of current practice,

as explained in Section B.4 and the barriers identified could not prevent implementation of the

alternatives except the project activity.

Step D: Common practice analysis.

As per the tool for the demonstrations and assessment of additionality (version-05.2) approved at the 39th

meeting of CDM executive board requires the project participant to demonstrate and assess additionality,

step C is not required after implementation of step B.

Sub-step 4a. Analyze other activities similar to the proposed project activity.

No other liquefied natural gas plants have installed WHRU on GTG’s to recover waste heat for the

purpose of heating hot oil in the EGYPT. It is customary and by practise to vent flue gases GTG’s.

However, utilizing of waste heat recovery in 2 plant amongst the oil and gas plants in Egypt is practiced

for energy efficiency purpose and the 2 gas plants were originally designed to include this WHRU, in

additions none of them were submitted as a CDM project.

Company Name WHRU technology utilization Submit as CDM project

SEGAS Yes but Not on GTG’S No CDM

UGDC Yes No CDM

RASHPETCO No No CDM

SIDI KERIR petrochemicals No -

MIDOOR refinery No -

AMOC refinery No -

APC No -

GASGCO No -

Page 25: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 25

WEBCO No -

LAB No -

EPC No -

Suez refinery No -

Sub-step 4b. Discuss any similar options that are occurring.

The Egyptian national laws and regulations of the power sector and oil and gas sectors in the EGYPT

does not provide incentives to enhance energy efficiency in plant except for enhancing the power factors

inside facilities that is utilized power.

Outcome of Step 4:

The common practice analysis shows that no similar activities can be observed similar to the proposed

project activity.

Page 26: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 26

B.6. Emission reductions:

B.6.1. Explanation of methodological choices:

>> Baseline Emissions

The baseline emissions for the year y shall be determined as follows:

BE y = BEEn,y + BEflst,y

Where:

BEy = the total baseline emissions during the year y in tons of CO2

BEEn,y = The baseline emissions from energy generated by project activity during the year y in

tons of CO2

BEflst,y = Baseline emissions from steam generation, if any, using fossil fuel that would have been

used for flaring the waste gas in absence of the project activity (tCO2e per year), calculated as

per equation 1c. This is relevant for those project activities where in the baseline steam is used to

flare the waste gas = 0 (where there is no steam generation for used to carry flue gases to the

exhaust of the GTG , the flue gases is emitted to atmosphere by natural draft)

Then: BE y = BEEn,y

Baseline emissions for the base line scenario

The Baseline Scenario represents the situation where the heat from a fossil fuel based element process

(i.e.: hot oil heaters).

The project activity is generation of heat only, and then sub-sections number of the ACM00012 is used

for estimating baseline. Thus, sub section (b) of B5 of the ACM 12 were used for calculation of the

baseline emissions from energy generated by project activity during the year y in tons of CO2 (BEEn,y).

Where (BEEn,y) = (BEther,y).

Baseline emissions from thermal energy (BEEn,y)

Where:

BEther,y = Baseline emissions from thermal energy during the year y in tons of CO2

f cap = Energy that would have been produced in project year y using waste energy generated in base year

y expressed as a fraction of total energy produced using waste source in year y. (The ratio is 1 if the

waste energy generated in project year y is same or less than that generated in base year. The value is

estimated using equations (1f), or (1f-1) or (1f-2), or (1g), (1g-1) or (1h))

f wcm = Fraction of total heat generated by the project activity electricity using waste energy.

Page 27: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 27

This fraction is 1 if the heat generation is purely from use of waste energy. If the element process

providing heat uses both waste and fossil fuels, this factor is estimated using equation (1d/1e)

HG j,y = Net quantity of heat (enthalpy) supplied to the recipient plant j by the project activity during the

year y in TJ (It should be noted that no additional fuel outside the hot oil generator is fired to heat the

feed oil. for hot oil generator this is expressed as difference in energy content between the hot oil

supplied to and returned by the recipient plant(heat consumers) to element process of cogeneration

plant).

EF heat,j,y = The CO2 emission factor of the element process supplying heat that would have supplied the

recipient plant j (heat consumers) in absence of the project activity, expressed in tCO2/TJ and calculated

as follows:

Where:

EF CO2,i,j = The CO2 emission factor per unit of energy of the baseline fuel used in i th oil heaters used by

recipient j (hot oil consumers), in tCO2/TJ, in absence of the project activity

η EP,i,j = Efficiency of the ith element process (hot oil heaters ) that would have been supplied heat to j

th recipient (hot oil consumers), in the absence of the project activity

WS i,j = Fraction of total heat that is used by the recipient j in the project that in absence of the project

activity would have been supplied by the ith hot oil heaters.

MG i,j,y,tur = Mechanical energy generated and supplied to the recipient j, which in the absence of the

project activity would receive power from a steam turbine i, driven by steam generated in a fossil fuel

boiler. Refer monitoring table for the guidance to estimate this parameter = 0

η mech,tur = The efficiency of the baseline equipment (steam turbine) that would provide mechanical

power in the absence of the project activity. = 0

Note:

MG i,j,y,tur and η mech,tur is equal to zero as ther is no mechanical energy generated and supplied to

the recipents ( hot oil consumers ) nor the base line equipment ( hot oil heaters)

Page 28: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 28

Efficiency of the element process or hot oil heaters (η EP,i,j) is based on:

(i) Assume a constant efficiency of the element process and determine the efficiency, as a

conservative approach, for optimal operation conditions i.e. design fuel, optimal load, optimal

oxygen content in flue gases, adequate fuel conditioning (temperature, viscosity, moisture,

size/mesh etc), representative or favorable ambient conditions (ambient temperature and

Calculation of CO2 emission factor of the element process supplying heat that would have

supplied the recipient plant j (heat consumers) in absence of the project activity,

Parameters Description Value Reference

EF CO2,i,j The CO2 emission factor per unit of energy of the

baseline fuel (natural gas) used in i th oil heaters

used by recipient j (hot oil consumers), in

tCO2/TJ, in absence of the project activity

55 tco2/TJ

η EP,i,j Efficiency of the ith element process (hot oil

heaters ) that would have been supplied heat to j th

recipient (hot oil consumers), in the absence of the

project activity

100%

Hot oil heater data sheet

WS i,j Fraction of total heat that is used by the recipient j

in the project that in absence of the project activity

would have been supplied by the ith hot oil

heaters.

100%

Plant operating conditions

EF heat,j,y The CO2 emission factor of the element process

supplying heat that would have supplied the

recipient plant j (heat consumers) in absence of the

project activity, expressed in tCO2/TJ

55

tco2/TJ

Page 29: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 29

Calculation of Baseline emissions from thermal energy (BEEn,y)

Parameters Description Value Reference

f cap Energy that would have been produced in project

year y using waste energy generated in base year

expressed as a fraction of total energy produced

using waste source in year y. (The ratio is 1 if

the waste energy generated in project year y is

same or less than that generated in base year.

The value is estimated using equations (1f), or

(1f-1) or (1f-2), or (1g), (1g-1) or (1h))

1

f wcm This fraction is 1 if the heat generation is purely

from use of waste energy. If the element process

providing heat uses both waste and fossil fuels,

this factor is estimated using equation (1d/1e)

1

HG j,y Net quantity of heat (enthalpy) supplied to the

recipient plant j (hot oil consumers) by the

project activity during the year y in TJ (for hot

oil generator this is expressed as difference in

energy content between the hot oil supplied to

and returned by the recipient plant(heat

consumers) to element process of cogeneration

plant).

1240.416

EF heat,j,y The CO2 emission factor of the element process

supplying heat that would have supplied the

recipient plant j (heat consumers) in absence of

the project activity, expressed in tCO2/TJ

55

BEther,y Baseline emissions from thermal energy during

the year y in tons of CO2

68222.88

Page 30: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 30

Capping of baseline emissions

The approved methodology ACM12 requires that baseline emissions to be capped irrespective of planned

/ un planned or actual increase in output of ELNG, change in operations parameters and practice, change

of fuel type and quantity resulting into increase in generation of waste energy.

As mentioned in the ACM12, project proponent shall select one of three methods to calculate the fcap.

Method-2 used in case of project activities implemented in a new facility or in facilities where three-year

data on production is unavailable.

The project proponent used Method 1 to estimate the cap as ELNG is more than three years

operating facility and data required to calculate F cap is available.

Case 1: In case the waste energy is in the form of waste heat of WECM .

Q WCM,BL = Average quantity of WECM released in atmosphere in three years prior to the start of the

project activity (Mass unit (kg) of WECM or other relevant unit).

Q WCM,y = Quantity of WECM used for energy generation during year y (mass unit (kg))

Cp wcm = Specific Heat of waste energy carrying medium (WECM) (TJ/kg/deg C)

t wcm y,= Average temperature of Waste Energy Carrying Medium (WECM) in year y (Deg C or any other

appropriate unit)

t wcm BL,= Average temperature of Waste Energy Carrying Medium (WECM) in three years prior to the

start of the project activity (Deg C or any other appropriate unit)

t ref = Reference temperature to be used to determine available energy in WECM (either 0 deg C or 25

deg C or other appropriate temperature with proper justification)

NCV WCM,y = Average net calorific value of waste gas in year y (if WECM is waste gas), which has un-

burnt components such as carbon particles, CO or CH4 that will provide energy in waste energy recovery

equipment on combustion of gas. (TJ/kg)

NCVWCM,BL = Average net calorific value of waste gas (if WECM is waste gas), three years prior to

implementation of project activity which has unburnt components such as carbon particles, CO or CH4

that will provide energy in waste energy recovery equipment on combustion of gas. (TJ/kg)

P WCM y, = Average pressure of WECM in year y (kg/cm2 (a) or any other appropriate unit)

Page 31: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 31

P WCM BL, = Average pressure of WECM in three years prior to the start of the project activity (kg/cm2 (a)

or any other appropriate unit)

P ref = Reference pressure of WECM (either 1 atm. or other appropriate pressure with proper

justification)

H WCM y, = Average enthalpy of WECM in year y (kJ/kg or any other appropriate unit)

H WCM BL, = Average enthalpy of WECM in three years prior to the start of the project activity (kJ/kg or

any other appropriate unit)

H ref = Reference enthalpy to be used to determine available energy in WECM ( 0 kJ/kg or other

appropriate enthalpy with proper justification)

d wcm,y = Average density of WECM at actual temperature and pressure in year y (kg/m3 at actual

conditions)

d wcm,BL = Average density of WECM at actual temperature and pressure in three years prior to the start

of the project activity (kg/m3 at actual conditions)

9.81/109 = Factor to convert kg-m into TJ (To be used when pressure is expressed in kg/m2. For all other

units of pressure, the conversion factor should be defined appropriately).

Page 32: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 32

Calculation of Capping of baseline emissions (Case 1: In case the waste energy is in the form of

waste heat of WECM).

Parameters Description Value Reference

Q WCM,BL Average quantity of WECM released in atmosphere

in three years prior to the start of the project activity

(Mass unit (kg) of WECM or other relevant unit).

7.51E+09 calculated

Q WCM,y Quantity of WECM used for energy generation

during year y (mass unit (kg)) 7.51E+09 calculated

Cp wcm Specific Heat of waste energy carrying medium

(WECM) (TJ/kg/deg C) 1.12E-09 calculated

t wcm y, Average temperature of Waste Energy Carrying

Medium (WECM) in year y (Deg C or any other

appropriate unit)

365 actual data

t wcm BL, Average temperature of Waste Energy Carrying

Medium (WECM) in three years prior to the start of

the project activity (Deg C or any other appropriate

unit)

365

t ref Reference temperature to be used to determine

available energy in WECM (either 0 deg C or 25

deg C or other appropriate temperature with proper

justification)

15.5

NCV WCM,y Average net calorific value of waste gas in year y (if

WECM is waste gas), which has un-burnt

components such as carbon particles, CO or CH4

that will provide energy in waste energy recovery

equipment on combustion of gas. (TJ/kg)

0

No calorific value for

waste gas

NCVWCM,BL Average net calorific value of waste gas (if WECM

is waste gas), three years prior to implementation of 0

No calorific value for

waste gas

Page 33: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 33

project activity which has un-burnt components

such as carbon particles, CO or CH4 that will

provide energy in waste energy recovery equipment

on combustion of gas. (TJ/kg)

P WCM y, Average pressure of WECM in year y (kg/cm2 (a) or

any other appropriate unit) 1.2

P WCM BL, Average pressure of WECM in three years prior to

the start of the project activity (kg/cm2 (a) or any

other appropriate unit)

1.2

P ref Reference pressure of WECM (either 1 atm. or

other appropriate pressure with proper justification) 1.013

H WCM y, Average enthalpy of WECM in year y (kJ/kg or any

other appropriate unit) 698.1

H WCM BL, Average enthalpy of WECM in three years prior to

the start of the project activity (kJ/kg or any other

appropriate unit)

698.1

H ref Reference enthalpy to be used to determine

available energy in WECM ( 0 kJ/kg or other

appropriate enthalpy with proper justification)

1134

d wcm,y Average density of WECM at actual temperature

and pressure in year y (kg/m3 at actual conditions) 1.265

d wcm,BL Average density of WECM at actual temperature

and pressure in three years prior to the start of the

project activity (kg/m3 at actual conditions)

1.265

9.81/109 Factor to convert kg-m into TJ (To be used when

pressure is expressed in kg/m2. For all other units of

pressure, the conversion factor should be defined

appropriately).

9.81E-09

F-cap Capping of baseline emissions 1

Page 34: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 34

Project Emissions

Project Emissions include emissions due to Combustion of auxiliary fuel to supplement waste

gas/heat.

The above scenario is due to the backup operation of heaters in case of failure of waste heat

recovery unit.

It worth mention that There is no Electricity emissions due to consumption of electricity for

cleaning of gas before being used for generation of energy or other supplementary electricity

consumption.

Project emissions are calculated as follow:

Where:

PE = Project emissions due to project activity

PE AF y, = Project activity emissions from on-site consumption of fossil fuels by the cogeneration

plant(s), in case they are used as supplementary fuels, due to non availability of waste energy to the

project activity or due to any other reason. =0

PE EL y, = Project activity emissions from on-site consumption of electricity for gas cleaning equipment

or other supplementary electricity consumption (as per Table 2: Summary of gases and sources included

in the project boundary) =0

PE EL port y,Im , = Project activity emissions from import of electricity replacing captive electricity

Generated in the absence of the project activity for Type-2 project activities. =0

Then PEy = 0

Page 35: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 35

Project Emissions

Parameters Description Value Reference

PE AF y, Project activity emissions from on-site consumption of fossil

fuels by the cogeneration plant(s), in case they are used as

supplementary fuels, due to non availability of waste energy

to the project activity or due to any other reason.

0

PE EL y, Project activity emissions from on-site consumption of

electricity for gas cleaning equipment or other supplementary

electricity consumption (as per Table 2: Summary of gases

and sources included in the project boundary)

0

PE EL port y,Im Project activity emissions from import of electricity replacing

captive electricity Generated in the absence of the project

activity for Type-2 project activities.

0

PE y Project Emissions 0

Leakage

No leakage is applicable under this methodology.

Emission Reductions

Emission reductions due to the project activity during the year y are calculated as follows:

ER y = BE y − PE y Where:

ER y = Total emissions reductions during the year y in tons of CO2

PE y = Emissions from the project activity during the year y in tons of CO2 = 0

BE y = Baseline emissions for the project activity during the year y in tons of CO2=68222.88

Since the project emissions are non-existent in the project activity so the emission reductions (ERy ) equal the baseline emissions (BEy)

Then ER y = BE y = 68222.88

Page 36: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 36

B.6.2. Data and parameters that are available at validation:

(Copy this table for each data and parameter)

Data / Parameter: η or η EP,i,j

Data unit: %

Description: Baseline efficiency of the element process (hot oil heaters)

Source of data used: Manufacturers data or data from similar plant operators or project participants data

Value applied: 100 %

Justification of the choice of data or description of measurement methods and procedures actually applied :

Maximum efficiency of 100%/

Any comment:

Data / Parameter: QWCM,BL

Data unit: Mass unit (kg) of WECM or other relevant unit

Description: Average quantity of waste energy released in atmosphere by WECM in three years prior to the start of the project activity.

Source of data used: Source of data is manufacturer’s specifications.

Value applied: 7.51E+09 Justification of the choice of data or description of measurement methods and procedures actually applied :

Estimated based on information provided by the technology supplier and the external expert on the waste energy generation per unit of product and volume or quantity of production.

Any comment:

Data / Parameter: ref t , ref P , ref H

Data unit: deg C , kg/cm2 (a), kJ/kg respectively or other appropriate unit

Description: Reference temperature, pressure and enthalpy

Source of data used: Use the following values or other appropriate pressure with proper justification: 0 for reference temperature.

Value applied: 15.5 Justification of the choice of data or description of measurement methods and procedures actually applied :

Manufacture reference temperature

Any comment:

Page 37: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 37

Data / Parameter: twcm,BL

Data unit: deg C or other appropriate unit

Description: Average temperature of WECM in three years prior to the start of the project Activity

Source of data used: To be measured using appropriate temperature measuring instrument (e.g. Pressure gauge, Manometer etc.)

Value applied: 365

Justification of the choice of data or description of measurement methods and procedures actually applied :

To be averaged based on daily measured values

Any comment:

Data / Parameter: H WCM BL,

Data unit: kJ/kg or any other appropriate unit

Description: Average enthalpy of WECM in three years prior to the start of the project Activity

Source of data used: From engineering data books

Value applied: 698.1

Justification of the choice of data or description of measurement methods and procedures actually applied :

Measure daily temperature and pressure of WECM, average it annually. At yearly averaged value of pressure and temperature, find enthalpy of WECM.

Any comment:

Data / Parameter: QOE,BL

Data unit: GJ/hr

Description: Output/intermediate energy that can be theoretically produced (in appropriate unit), to be determined on the basis of maximum recoverable energy from the WECM, which would have been released (or WECM would have been flared or energy content of WECM would have been wasted) in the absence of CDM project activity.

Source of data used: For estimating the theoretical energy, manufacturer’s specifications can be used.

Value applied: 40 *4

Justification of the choice of data or description of measurement methods and procedures actually applied :

Based on equipment specifications, i.e. utilizable energy differential, energy transmission efficiency, etc.

Any comment:

Page 38: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 38

B.6.3. Ex-ante calculation of emission reductions:

>> Refer to B.6.1

B.6.4 Summary of the ex-ante estimation of emission reductions:

>>

B.7. Application of the monitoring methodology and description of the monitoring plan:

All data collected as part of monitoring plan should be archived electronically and shall be kept at least

for 2 years after the end of the last crediting period. 100% of the data shall be monitored. The following

data shall be monitored.

For Project emissions:

1. Quantity of fossil fuels used as supplementary fuel;

2. Net calorific value of fossil fuel;

3. CO2 emission factor of the fossil fuel;

4. Quantity of electricity consumed by the project operations;

5. CO2 emissions factor of electricity consumed by the project operations.

While the quantity of fossil fuels fired are measured using calibrated flow meters, other data items are

only factors obtained from reliable local or national data. If local data is not available, project participant

may use default factors published by IPCC.

Year

Estimation of emission reductions

(Tonnes of CO2e)

2011 34111

2012 68222

2013 68222

2014 68222

2015 68222

2016 68222

2017 68222

2018 68222

2019 68222

2020 68222 Annual average over the crediting period of estimated reductions (tonnes of CO2e)

648109

Annual Average emission per year of estimated CO2e emission reduction in tones of CO2eq

64810

Page 39: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 39

For Baseline Emissions:

Depending on baseline emission scenario 1, the following data items need monitoring:

• Quantity of heat supplied to the recipient plant(s);

• Properties of heat (e.g. pressure and temperature of the steam) supplied to the recipient plant(s);

• Properties of heat return to element process (e.g. pressure and temperature of the condensate

return) supplied by the recipient plant(s) to the project plant;

• Efficiencies of element process that would have been built in the absence of the project activity;

B.7.1 Data and parameters monitored:

Data / Parameter: FFi,y

Data unit: NM3 or ton

Description: Quantity of fossil fuel type i combusted to supplement WECM in the project activity during the year y, in energy or mass units

Source of data to be used:

Measurement records of recipient plant(s)

Value of data applied for the purpose of calculating expected emission reductions in section B.5

0 Nm3/hr

Description of measurement methods and procedures to be applied:

Continuously and aggregated monthly

QA/QC procedures to be applied:

Fuel flow meters will undergo maintenance/calibration subject to appropriate industry standards. Records of measuring devices shall ensure the data consistency. Fuel purchase records/receipts by recipient plants shall be used to verify the measured data

Any comment: This data item is measured in volume units and mass units

Data / Parameter: wsi,,j

Data unit: Gj/hr

Description: Fraction of total heat that is used by the recipient j in the project that in absence of the project activity would have been supplied by the ith hot oil heaters

Source of data to be used:

Estimated from data on heat consumption by recipient j. And Data sheet of the heater

Value of data applied for the purpose of calculating expected emission reductions in section B.5

38*4

Page 40: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 40

Description of measurement methods and procedures to be applied:

Yearly

QA/QC procedures to be applied:

No QA/QC necessary for this data item

Any comment:

Data / Parameter: QWCM,y

Data unit: Mass unit (kg)

Description: Quantity of WECM /Waste Gas used for energy generation during year y

Source of data to be used:

Generators of energy

Value of data applied for the purpose of calculating expected emission reductions in section B.5

7.51E+09

Description of measurement methods and procedures to be applied:

Calculated.

QA/QC procedures to be applied:

Measuring equipment should be calibrated on regular equipment. During the time of calibration and maintenance if it will be disconnected for long time, alternative equipment should be used for monitoring

Any comment: • There is a technical limitation exist that prevents the measurement of waste gas at the inlet to the WHRU, as there is no measuring point at 2 elevation of the gas turbine stalk. However it is under study to install a flow meter.

Data / Parameter: EFCO2,i,j

Data unit: Tonnes CO2/TJ

Description: CO2 emission factor per unit of energy of the fossil fuel used in the baseline generation source i (i=is) providing energy to recipient j

Source of data to be used:

IPCC default values.

Value of data applied for the purpose of calculating expected emission reductions in section B.5

52

Description of measurement methods and procedures to be applied:

IPCC guidelines

QA/QC procedures to be applied:

No QA/QC necessary for this data item

Page 41: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 41

Any comment:

Data / Parameter: HGj,y

Data unit: TJ

Description: Net quantity of heat supplied to the recipient plant j by the project activity during the year y in TJ. In case of hot oil generator this is expressed as difference in energy content between the hot oil supplied to and returned by the recipient plant(s) to element process of cogeneration plant).

Source of data to be used:

Recipient plant(s) actual measurement records

Value of data applied for the purpose of calculating expected emission reductions in section B.5

0.1536

Description of measurement methods and procedures to be applied:

No additional fuel outside the oil generator should be fired to heat the feed oil. The respective enthalpies should be determined based on the mass (or volume) flows, the temperatures

Monitoring frequency:

Continuously, aggregated annually

QA/QC procedures to be applied:

Measuring equipment should be calibrated on regular equipment. During the time of calibration and maintenance if it disconnected for long time , alternative equipment should be used for monitoring

Any comment:

Data / Parameter: EFCO2,i,j

Data unit: Tonnes CO2/TJ

Description: CO2 emission factor per unit of energy of the baseline fuel used in ith heaters used by recipient j, in tCO2/TJ, in absence of the project activity

Source of data to be used:

IPCC default values

Value of data applied for the purpose of calculating expected emission reductions in section B.5

52

Description of measurement methods and procedures to be applied:

IPCC guidelines

Monitoring Frequency Yearly

QA/QC procedures to be applied:

No QA/QC necessary for this data item

Any comment:

Page 42: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 42

Data / Parameter: EFCO2,j

Data unit: Tonnes CO2/TJ

Description: CO2 emission factor of fossil fuel (tCO2/TJ) that would have been used at facility ‘j’ for flaring the waste gas

Source of data to be used:

IPCC default values

Value of data applied for the purpose of calculating expected emission reductions in section B.5

52

Description of measurement methods and procedures to be applied:

IPCC guidelines

Monitoring Frequency Yearly

QA/QC procedures to be applied:

No QA/QC necessary for this data item

Any comment:

Data / Parameter: EFCO2,i

Data unit: Tonnes CO2/TJ

Description: CO2 emission factor per unit of energy or mass of the fuel type i

Source of data to be used:

IPCC default values.

Value of data applied for the purpose of calculating expected emission reductions in section B.5

52

Description of measurement methods and procedures to be applied:

IPCC guidelines

Monitoring Frequency Yearly

QA/QC procedures to be applied:

No QA/QC necessary for this data item

Any comment:

Data / Parameter: Qi,h

Data unit: kg/h

Description: Amount of individual fuel (and other fuel(s)) i consumed at the energy generation unit during hour h

Source of data to be Project participants

Page 43: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 43

used:

Value of data applied for the purpose of calculating expected emission reductions in section B.5

680

Description of measurement methods and procedures to be applied:

Flow measurement Lab analysis results of density of fuel gas.

Monitoring Frequency Continuously

QA/QC procedures to be applied:

Measuring equipment should be calibrated on regular equipment. During the time of calibration and maintenance if it disconnected for long time , alternative equipment should be used for monitoring

Any comment:

Data / Parameter: NCVi or NCVWCM,y

Data unit: (TJ/kg)

Description: Net Calorific Value annual average for each individual consumed fuel and/or WECM

Source of data to be used:

No calorific value for flue gases

Value of data applied for the purpose of calculating expected emission reductions in section B.5

0

Description of measurement methods and procedures to be applied:

Monitoring Frequency

QA/QC procedures to be applied:

Any comment: Good practice guidance

Data / Parameter: Qwcm,h

Data unit: kg/h

Description: Quantity of WECM recovered in hour h

Source of data to be used:

Generator of WECM

Value of data applied for the purpose of calculating expected

0

Page 44: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 44

emission reductions in section B.5

Description of measurement methods and procedures to be applied:

No applicable

Monitoring Frequency Continuously

QA/QC procedures to be applied:

Any comment:

Data / Parameter: Cpwcm

Data unit: TJ/kg-deg C or other suitable unit

Description: Specific Heat of WECM or fuel

Source of data to be used:

From standard engineering data books/ textbooks. Example reference “Fundamentals of Classical Thermodynamics; Gordon J. Van Wylen, Richard E. Sonntag and Claus Borgnakke; 4º Edition, 1994, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.”

Value of data applied for the purpose of calculating expected emission reductions in section B.5

1.12E-09

Description of measurement methods and procedures to be applied:

Monitoring Frequency Once every six-month for the first year. If it can be established that the CP of WECM does not change, one constant figure can be used for entire crediting period.

QA/QC procedures to be applied:

Any comment: There is no necessity to use the specific heat of fuel if the index i in equation represents fuel as sensible heat of fuel is considered to be zero

Data / Parameter: twcm,h or ti,h

Data unit: (deg C or other appropriate unit)

Description: The temperature of WECM in hour h

Source of data to be used:

To be measured using appropriate temperature recorder (temperature data logger)

Value of data applied for the purpose of calculating expected emission reductions in section B.5

365

Description of Use appropriate instrument (e.g. digital temperature data logger)

Page 45: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 45

measurement methods and procedures to be applied:

Monitoring Frequency Measured continuously, averaged hourly

QA/QC procedures to be applied:

Any comment:

Data / Parameter: t wcm y

Data unit: deg C or other appropriate unit

Description: Average temperature of Waste Energy Carrying Medium (WECM) in year y

Source of data to be used:

To be measured using appropriate temperature measuring instrument

Value of data applied for the purpose of calculating expected emission reductions in section B.5

365

Description of measurement methods and procedures to be applied:

Use appropriate instrument (e.g. digital temperature indicator)

Monitoring Frequency Measured daily, averaged yearly

QA/QC procedures to be applied:

Any comment:

Data / Parameter: H WCM y

Data unit: kJ/kg or any other appropriate unit

Description: Average enthalpy of WECM in year y

Source of data to be used:

To be referred from the engineering data books

Value of data applied for the purpose of calculating expected emission reductions in section B.5

698.1

Description of measurement methods and procedures to be applied:

Measure temperature and pressure at which the enthalpy has to be determined

Monitoring Frequency Measured daily, averaged yearly

QA/QC procedures to be applied:

Temperature and pressure measured daily, averaged yearly. Determine enthalpy at average temperature and pressure of WECM.

Any comment:

Page 46: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 46

Data / Parameter: EFheat,j,y

Data unit: Tonnes CO2/TJ

Description: CO2 emission factor of the heat source that would have supplied the recipient plant j in absence of the project activity, expressed in tCO2/TJ

Source of data to be used:

IPCC default values.

Value of data applied for the purpose of calculating expected emission reductions in section B.5

52

Description of measurement methods and procedures to be applied:

IPCC guidelines

Monitoring Frequency Yearly

QA/QC procedures to be applied:

No QA/QC necessary for this data item

Any comment:

B.7.2. Description of the monitoring plan:

The proposed project activity will be operated and managed by the project proponent. Data

mentioned in B7 will be recorded by plant personnel and stored in plant information system.

In order to ensure project performance an annual QA/QC and bi-annual environmental internal

audit will be conducted.

Installed meters will be calibrated according to the preventative maintenance schedule program.

The piping and instrumentation will be designed to ensure safe and reliable operations of the

WHRUs.

B.8. Date of completion of the application of the baseline study and monitoring methodology

and the name of the responsible person(s)/entity(ies):

Egyptian LNG El Beheria Govenerrnate Egypt. www.egyptianlng.com Date of completion the final draft of the baseline section is 24/6/2010 is the -------------

Page 47: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 47

SECTION C. Duration of the project activity / crediting period

C.1. Duration of the project activity:

C.1.1. Starting date of the project activity:

>>March 2008

C.1.2. Expected operational lifetime of the project activity: >> 20 years 0 months

C.2. Choice of the crediting period and related information:

C.2.1. Renewable crediting period:

C.2.1.1. Starting date of the first crediting period:

>> Fixed crediting period has been chosen for the project activities

C.2.1.2. Length of the first crediting period:

>>>> Fixed crediting period has been chosen for the project activities

C.2.2. Fixed crediting period:

C.2.2.1. Starting date:

>> 15, March, 2012

C.2.2.2. Length:

>> 10 years 0 months

SECTION D. Environmental impacts

>>

D.1. Documentation on the analysis of the environmental impacts, including transboundary

impacts:

>> ELNG has Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency (EEAA) approval on the Environmental Impact

Assessment for the project activities4.

D.2. If environmental impacts are considered significant by the project participants or the host

Party, please provide conclusions and all references to support documentation of an environmental

impact assessment undertaken in accordance with the procedures as required by the host Party:

>>for environmental impacts with the potential of negative environmental impact, ELNG will adopt and

apply appropriates mitigation measures to reduce such impacts.

Page 48: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 48

SECTION E. Stakeholders’ comments

E.1. Brief description how comments by local stakeholders have been invited and compiled:

>>A local stalk holder consultation meeting was organized on the 14th of June, 2010 at ELNG. The

stalk holders comprised from IDKU city representatives, shareholders, NGO’s and RASHPETCO

(ELNG upstream gas plant) in addition to Egyptian DNA, EEAA (Egyptian Environmental Affairs

Agency) and CDM –APU (Awareness and promotion unit) representatives

All stalk holders were informed by meeting through a letter from the HSE manger of ELNG. The

notifications were sent 5 days before the meeting.

The Agenda of the meeting was as follow:

1. Welcome note and brief description of ELNG environmental activities and CDM initiatives by

the operational director of ELNG facility.

2. Welcome note from the HSE manger.

3. Presentation of the CDM –Kyoto protocol shows the important of stalk holder participation in

CDM projects.

4. Presentation of the proposed projects including brief in technical, socio economics and

environmental benefits.

5. Open discussion about the projects and ELNG activities and recording of comments.

E.2. Summary of the comments received:

>> at the beginning of the meeting and during the welcome note of the OD, Mr. Mohamed Ahmed Bermo

head of Literare club in Idku , comments on the ELNG activities and his opinion that this activities may

impact on the plants and agriculture activities near IDKU city, then he asked Mr. OD what kind of

services and community projects were developed by the company to improve the environment and

quality of life of Idku resident, Mr. OD response to the comments explaining the mechanism and plan

and how this was in the ELNG agenda since the original project start date. In addition, for agricultural

area, Mr. OD explained that the type of activity carried out by ELNG doesn’t impact on the agriculture

and environment, this due to that ELNG doesn’t use any materials that have significant impact on the

environment and all waste generated from its activities is well managed through waste disposal contract

in the same time all fuel used inside the plant in natural gas which is the cleanest fossil fuel and all

emission analysis reports show that ELNG complying with Egyptian environmental law. finally, Mr. OD

mentioned that even the company have no obligation and are complying with the Egyptian environmental

Page 49: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 49

law, today we are discussing a project that is considered an improvement to the environment and

promotion of community development.

Mr. Mohamed comments that ELNG need to purplish some flyers or newsletter about ELNG community

development activities. After that meeting agenda proceed.

At the end of the meeting some question raised by the participant as follow:

What is the wind direction? Please highlight to the participant the wind direction on the company

site map. (EEAA representative – Eng. Hoda Mostafa)

ELNG highlighted the wind direction and distances with IDKU on the geographical map in presentation.

What the benefits to the local community from such project?

ELNG explained there is an existing long partnership between the company and its stakeholder since

start up date of the original project, this partnership includes many mutual activities and a community

development program that have an annual budget, the project is a small change with the activities and

like increasing the one level in a building in the same time using the same materials but with less fuel. By

applying this project ELNG and its stakeholders contribute in saving the environmental and enhance the

company image in addition this initiative will be start point for other CDM projects that may have larger

carbon emission reduction. The number of employees that will enter the site during the construction of

the project is considered small comparing to those who already working in the original project. Take in

consideration that a considerable number of workers inside ELNG facility are/ were employed in the

operation/ construction phase of the project. However, ELNG may consider the employment of workers

from IDKU if skilled competent workers who can perform the job are available.

What if there is leak from the coil of hot oil in the WHRU? What kind of protection the company

have to prevent such leakage?

The natural draft of stalk of GTG will help not form explosion mixture and there must be a way to detect

such leak which will be considered during the detail design of the unit. In addition, the materials

selection of such coil is very important and ELNG aware of this issue and by selecting materials with a

good quality that with stand the temperature the probability of leakage will be minimized. Also, the

company have QA/QC program for selection, inspection and supervise installing of such coils.

There will be a decrease of temperature of the flue gases of GTG, Does the emission of GTG

reduced by installing WHRU?

No, this issue is with minor impact, however. It will decrease the temperature of flue gases emitted to

atmosphere. And there will be no reduction of emissions from GTG. It will be the same below the law

requirements.

Page 50: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 50

Does the flue gases of GTG flammable?

No. it is mainly CO2 and H2O

How come that CO2 is not mentioned in the Egyptian law as pollutant that ELNG have to control?

AS CO2 is directly emitted from any human activity including industry and it is directly related to the

economic and luxury of life, EGYPT and many other countries cannot make CO2 emissions reduction

compulsory as this will severely impact its economy, however this can implied one day in the future

through one of the international agreement between government. One of the proposed solutions of CO2

level in atmosphere is what ELNG consulting you today.

Does ELNG will sell the existing oil heaters?

No it will act as back in case of failure or shutdown of the WHRU.

Does the existing concert designed to with stand the new unit?

Few minor modification will happened in the in the base of GTG.ELNG will make sure that no impact on

the existing concrete base.

All comment received from the participant is positive and request that project to be applied in other pants

related to the oil and gas sector in Egypt.

E.3. Report on how due account was taken of any comments received:

>> None of the comments and request of stakeholders requires an action by ELNG during different stages of the proposed project.

Page 51: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 51

Annex 1

CONTACT INFORMATION ON PARTICIPANTS IN THE PROJECT ACTIVITY

Organization: Egyptian LNG

Street/P.O.Box:

Building:

City: IDKU

State/Region:

Postcode/ZIP:

Country: EGYPT

Telephone: 00202276200

FAX:

E-Mail: [email protected]

URL: www.Egyptianlng.com

Represented by: Yasser Mohamed Fathy

Title: Senior HSE Engineer

Salutation:

Last name: Fathy

Middle name: Yasser

First name: Yasser

Department: HSE

Mobile: 0020127877778

Direct FAX:

Direct tel:

Personal e-mail: [email protected]

Page 52: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 52

Annex 2

INFORMATION REGARDING PUBLIC FUNDING

Public funding from annex 1 country is not involves in this project

Page 53: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 53

Annex 3

BASELINE INFORMATION

As mentioned in B6.2 and B7

Page 54: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 54

Annex 4

MONITORING INFORMATION

Page 55: Lng Pdd Whru

DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03

CDM – Executive Board page 55

1 Refer to the original design documents of Egyptian LNG facilities 2 Reference EIA of Egyptian LNG. 3 HJ0015-00-SR-REP-9000-Rev-0 4 EEAA approval on the WHRU project