YOU ARE DOWNLOADING DOCUMENT

Please tick the box to continue:

Transcript
  • 8/9/2019 Kwik Tek v Nash Mfg. - Complaint

    1/29

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

    Civil Action No.

    KWIK TEK INC., a Colorado corporation,

    Plaintiff,

    v.

    NASH MANUFACTURING INC., a Texas corporation,

    Defendant.

    COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

    Plaintiff KWIK TEK INC. (Kwik Tek) complains of Defendant NASH

    MANUFACTURING INC. (DEFENDANT) and alleges as follows:

    JURISDICTION

    1. This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the

    United States of America, Title 35, United States Code, and in particular, 35 U.S.C. 271, et

    seq. Jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C. 1338(a). The patent infringement alleged has been and

    is now being carried out throughout the United States and on information and belief within the

    District of Colorado as well.

    2. This is also an action for preliminary and permanent injunctive relief and

    monetary damages under the Trademark Act of 1946, as amended, 15 U.S.C. 1051, et seq.

    {hereinafter the Trademark Act], the Colorado Consumer Protection Act, Colo.Rev.Stat. 6-

    1-102 et seq., and common law. Jurisdiction of this Court is conferred by 15 U.S.C. 1116,

    1121 and 1125(a) and 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338.

    Case 1:15-cv-00159 Document 1 Filed 01/22/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13

  • 8/9/2019 Kwik Tek v Nash Mfg. - Complaint

    2/29

    THE PATENT-IN-SUIT

    3. The patent-in-suit is United States Design Patent No. D720,030 which is referred

    to herein as the 030 Design Patent. The 030 Design Patent was duly and legally issued by

    the U. S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) on December 23, 2014 listing Leroy L.

    Peterson (Peterson) as the inventor and a true and accurate copy of the 030 Design Patent as

    issued by the USPTO on said date is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

    4. In February of 2009, inventor Peterson assigned his entire right, title and interest

    in and to U.S. patent application Serial No. 12/180,596 (the 596 application) to Sportsstuff, Inc.

    In March of 2010, plaintiff Kwik Tek acquired the 596 application from Sportsstuff, Inc. On

    May 30, 2014, Kwik Tek filed a design patent application as a continuation of the 596

    application and on December 23, 2014 the 030 Design Patent issued from this design patent

    application.

    5. By virtue of the aforesaid, Kwik Tek has the right to sue for infringement of the

    030 Design Patent.

    6. The 030 Design Patent is entitled Low Drag Aquatic Towing System and

    covers a novel ornamental design for a low drag aquatic towing system which connects a

    towable such as a tube to a power boat for towing the tube and is used in the water sport

    commonly known as tubing.

    THE PARTIES

    7. Plaintiff Kwik Tek is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of

    Colorado with an established place of business at 12000 E. 45 Ave., Unit 104, Denver,th

    Colorado 80239.

    2

    Case 1:15-cv-00159 Document 1 Filed 01/22/15 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 13

  • 8/9/2019 Kwik Tek v Nash Mfg. - Complaint

    3/29

    8. On information and belief, Defendant NASH MANUFACTURING INC.,

    (DEFENDANT) is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Texas which does

    business under the name NASH SPORTS at 315 West Ripy Street, Fort Worth, Texas 76110.

    Upon information and belief, DEFENDANT is currently doing business in Colorado, through,

    among other things, its distribution and sale of water sports products including the alleged

    infringing product to retailers and consumers in Colorado directly and through its web site

    nashmfg.com.

    BACKGROUND

    9. Plaintiff Kwik Tek has expended considerable money obtaining the 030 Design

    Patent which as indicated above issued from the 596 patent application. In addition, Kwik Tek

    has expended considerable time, effort and money commercializing its low drag aquatic towing

    system product which is covered by the 030 Design Patent and sold under the marks

    BOOSTER, SPORTSSTUFF BOOSTER BALL (BOOSTER BALL) and AIRHEAD BOB

    (BOB). (See Exhibit B) Kwik Teks commercialization efforts have included the promotion of

    its BOOSTER BALL and BOB products in its annual Buyers Guide and at trade shows every

    year since 2010 and 2012, respectively. These trade shows include the Surf Expo in Orlando,

    Florida; the Lorenz and Jones Show in Altoona, Iowa; the Land N Sea Show in Las Vegas; and

    the Donovan Marine Show in New Orleans, LA.

    10. Kwik Tek has also marked its BOOSTER BALL and BOB products patent

    pending since 2010 and 2012, respectively.

    11. On information and belief, DEFENDANT NASH has also had booths of its own

    at these trade shows and undoubtedly has seen Kwik Teks BOOSTER BALL and BOB products

    at these shows and noticed the patent pending markings on the products. Notwithstanding this

    3

    Case 1:15-cv-00159 Document 1 Filed 01/22/15 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 13

  • 8/9/2019 Kwik Tek v Nash Mfg. - Complaint

    4/29

    knowledge, DEFENDANT NASH introduced its infringing Arsenal Power Ball product

    (ACCUSED PRODUCT) (see Exhibit C) in 2011 in complete disregard of Kwik Teks rights.

    12. Kwik Teks BOOSTER BALL and BOB products have also been marked with the

    proper patent notice in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 287 since it issued in 2014. Such marking

    constitutes constructive notice to DEFENDANT of the '030 Design Patent.

    13. In addition, in an attempt to resolve this infringement matter with DEFENDANT

    without entering into litigation, in early January, 2015 Kwik Teks president Aaron Kramer

    advised Defendants president Keith Parten that Defendants Arsenal Power Ball product

    (ACCUSED PRODUCT) infringes the 030 Design Patent. After a few emails were exchanged

    Mr. Parten arrogantly responded to Mr. Kramer by email as follows: We do not infringe in any

    way. If you want to call and discuss with my attorney the cost of the conversation will be

    yours.(See Exhibit D)

    14. DEFENDANTs sale and/or offer to sell its Arsenal Power Ball product

    (ACCUSED PRODUCT) infringes the 030 Design Patent and induces infringement of the 030

    Design Patent as well.

    15. On information and belief, DEFENDANT manufactures its ACCUSED

    PRODUCT in China and imports the said ACCUSED PRODUCT into the United States from

    China, the importation of which also infringes the 030 Design Patent and induces infringement

    of the 030 Design Patent.

    16. In addition, on information and belief, DEFENDANT continues to offer to sell

    and/or sell and/or import the ACCUSED PRODUCT in the United States notwithstanding

    having been advised that the ACCUSED PRODUCT infringes the '030 Design Patent. Such

    conduct of DEFENDANT with knowledge of the 030 Design Patent constitutes a willful and

    4

    Case 1:15-cv-00159 Document 1 Filed 01/22/15 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 13

  • 8/9/2019 Kwik Tek v Nash Mfg. - Complaint

    5/29

    wanton disregard of Kwik Teks rights. Such conduct also constitutes willful and wanton

    infringement, entitling Kwik Tek to increased damages under 35 U.S.C. 284. Further, this is

    an exceptional case entitling Kwik Tek to recover its reasonable attorneys' fees under 35 U.S.C.

    285.

    17. In addition, Kwik Tek has recently discovered that DEFENDANT has been

    advertising and promoting its Arsenal Power Ball product as a Booster Ball(See Ex. C) which is

    in violation of Kwik Teks rights in the marks Booster Ball and Booster. This conduct by

    DEFENDANT is an obvious attempt to divert sales from Kwik Tek and palm off of the goodwill

    Kwik Tek has generated through its use of the Booster Ball and Booster marks on its BOOSTER

    BALL and BOB products. On information and belief, Defendants use of the Booster Ball and

    Booster marks has also caused and is likely to cause confusion, mistake, and deception among

    consumers. Such conduct constitutes unfair competition pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1125(a).

    18. To protect its rights in the Booster mark, Kwik Tek has filed a trademark

    application with the USPTO to register its Booster mark. (See Exhibit E)

    19. All conditions precedent to the bringing of this action have been performed or

    have occurred.

    FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    Direct Patent Infringement by Defendant

    35 U.S.C. 271(a)

    20. Kwik Tek incorporates the allegations of paragraphs 1 through 19 by reference,

    the same as if fully set forth herein.

    21. 35 U.S.C. 271(a) states that:

    Whoever without authority makes,

    uses, offers to sell or sells anypatented invention, within the United

    5

    Case 1:15-cv-00159 Document 1 Filed 01/22/15 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 13

  • 8/9/2019 Kwik Tek v Nash Mfg. - Complaint

    6/29

    States or imports into the United

    States any patented invention duringthe term of the patent therefor,

    infringes the patent.

    22. By its unauthorized manufacture, use, offer to sell, sale or importation of the

    ACCUSED PRODUCT, DEFENDANT has directly infringed, and on information and belief

    continues to infringe, the '030 Design Patent and has thereby damaged Kwik Tek.

    23. DEFENDANT has had knowledge of the '030 Design Patent for some time now

    and either knew or should have known that its sale of the ACCUSED PRODUCT infringed the

    '030 Design Patent, and induced others to infringe the '030 Design Patent. DEFENDANT has

    therefore acted willfully and wantonly in disregard of Kwik Tek' rights. Such conduct

    constitutes willful and wanton infringement, and Kwik Tek is thereby entitled to increased

    damages under 35 U.S.C. 284. Further, this is an exceptional case entitling Kwik Tek to

    recover its reasonable attorneys' fees under 35 U.S.C. 285.

    24. Kwik Tek has been and will continue to be severely damaged by DEFENDANTs

    unlawful infringement. Unless such infringement is abated and enjoined by this Court, Kwik

    Tek will suffer irreparable damage.

    SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    Inducing Infringement by Defendant

    35 U.S.C. 271(b)

    25. Kwik Tek incorporates the allegations of paragraphs 1 through 24 by reference,

    the same as if fully set forth herein.

    26. 35 U.S.C. 271(b) states that:

    Whoever actively induces

    infringement of a patentshall be liable as an infringer.

    6

    Case 1:15-cv-00159 Document 1 Filed 01/22/15 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 13

  • 8/9/2019 Kwik Tek v Nash Mfg. - Complaint

    7/29

    27. By its unauthorized sale of the ACCUSED PRODUCT, DEFENDANT, with full

    knowledge of the '030 Design Patent, has induced, encouraged, aided, and abetted others to

    infringe the '030 Design Patent and has thereby induced infringement of the '030 Design Patent,

    all to the damage of Kwik Tek.

    28. Upon information and belief, DEFENDANT has induced infringement willfully

    and wantonly and with full knowledge of the harm to Kwik Tek and Kwik Tek' rights; and

    therefore Kwik Tek is entitled to increased damages under 35 U.S.C. 284. In addition, this is

    an exceptional case entitling Kwik Tek to recover its attorneys' fees under 35 U.S.C. 285.

    29. Kwik Tek has been and will continue to be severely damaged by DEFENDANTs

    unlawful infringement. Unless such infringement is abated and enjoined by this Court, Kwik

    Tek will suffer irreparable damage.

    THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    Unfair Competition under Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1125(a) and

    Deceptive Trade Practices, Colorado Consumer Protection Act, Colo.Rev.Stats. 6-1-105

    30. Kwik Tek incorporates the allegations of paragraphs 1 through 29 by reference,

    the same as if fully set forth herein.

    31. DEFENDANTS use of Kwik Teks Booster Ball and Booster marks to promote,

    market, or sell its Arsenal Power Ball product in direct competition with Kwik Teks products

    constitutes unfair competition pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1125(a).

    32. DEFENDANTS use of the Booster Ball and Booster marks has undoubtedly

    caused and is likely to cause confusion, mistake, and deception among consumers.

    33. DEFENDANT, by its use of Booster Ball, as aforesaid, has made misleading

    representations of fact and/or has made false designations of origin, which are likely to cause

    7

    Case 1:15-cv-00159 Document 1 Filed 01/22/15 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 13

  • 8/9/2019 Kwik Tek v Nash Mfg. - Complaint

    8/29

    confusion, mistake, or to deceive, as to the affiliation, connection, and/or association of

    DEFENDANT, its business and/or product with Kwik Tek, its business, and itsBOOSTER

    BALL and BOB products, and/or as to the origin, sponsorship, and/or approval of

    DEFENDANTS business and product.

    34. DEFENDANTS advertising and promotion of its Arsenal Power Ball product as

    a Booster Ball as aforesaid which is confusingly similar to Kwik Teks Booster Ball and

    Booster marks misrepresents the nature, characteristics and/or qualities of DEFENDANTS

    product and business.

    35. DEFENDANT, by its use of Booster Ball as aforesaid, which is a colorable

    imitation of Kwik Teks Booster Ball and Booster marks, has passed off its business, and

    product as those of another, to wit, Kwik Teks business and BOOSTER BALL and BOB

    products.

    36. On information and belief, the acts of DEFENDANT as aforesaid in making false

    and misleading representation and designations, and passing off their product as that of another,

    are undertaken knowingly by DEFENDANT, and with the intent to trade off of Kwik Tek, its

    goodwill, representation, advertising and/or BOOSTER BALL and BOB products.

    37. By reason of their acts as aforesaid, DEFENDANT has violated Section 43(a) of

    the Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. 1125(a), and has committed unfair and deceptive trade practices,

    in violation of the Colorado Consumer Protection Act, Colo.Rev.Stats. 6-1-105.

    38. Kwik Tek has and will continue to suffer irreparable harm and damage as a result

    of the false and misleading representation and designations, and deceptive and unlawful trade

    practices, of DEFENDANT, in an amount not as yet ascertainable, thereby entitling Kwik Tek to

    recover its actual damages and costs, as well as DEFENDANTs profits, pursuant to 15 U.S.C.

    8

    Case 1:15-cv-00159 Document 1 Filed 01/22/15 USDC Colorado Page 8 of 13

  • 8/9/2019 Kwik Tek v Nash Mfg. - Complaint

    9/29

    1117(a), and entitling Kwik Tek to recover up to treble its actual damages, and its costs and

    attorney fees, pursuant to Colo.Rev.Stat. 6-1-113.

    39. The false representations, designations and deceptive trade practices of

    defendants, as aforesaid, are willful, wanton and without any claim of right, thereby entitling

    Kwik Tek to treble the amount of damages suffered, and render this an exceptional case entitling

    Kwik Tek to recover his attorney fees, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117.

    40. On information and belief, DEFENDANT will continue its false and misleading

    representations and designations and unfair and deceptive acts, as aforesaid, unless enjoined by

    this Court from so doing.

    WHEREFORE, Kwik Tek prays for judgment against DEFENDANT and in favor of

    Kwik Tek ordering, adjudging and declaring that:

    1. Jurisdiction is present and venue is proper;

    2. The 030 Design Patent is good and valid in law;

    3. DEFENDANT is liable for infringement of the '030 Design Patent;

    4. An accounting be had to determine the damages adequate to compensate Kwik

    Tek for the aforesaid infringement and that judgment in favor of Kwik Tek be thereupon entered

    against DEFENDANT, together with prejudgment interest;

    5. The acts of infringement of DEFENDANT have been deliberate, willful, and

    wanton entitling Kwik Tek pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284 to increased damages of three times the

    amount found or assessed;

    6. A preliminary and permanent injunction be issued enjoining DEFENDANT, its

    privies, and those in active consort therewith from further acts of infringement of the 030

    9

    Case 1:15-cv-00159 Document 1 Filed 01/22/15 USDC Colorado Page 9 of 13

  • 8/9/2019 Kwik Tek v Nash Mfg. - Complaint

    10/29

    Design Patent and from aiding, abetting, or inducing or in any way contributing to the

    infringement of said patent;

    7. The instant case is an exceptional case and that Kwik Tek be awarded its costs,

    expert witness fees, and reasonable attorneys' fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285;

    8. DEFENDANTs entire inventory of ACCUSED PRODUCT be delivered for

    destruction including the Arsenal Power Ball product and all packaging for the product as well

    as any reproductions, counterfeit copies, or colorable imitations thereof including all plates,

    molds, dies, matrices and other means of making the infringing product and its packaging as

    described herein;

    9. DEFENDANT is liable for false designation and representation of origin in

    violation of 15 U.S.C. 1125(a); and for unfair and deceptive trade practices, in violation of

    Colo.Rev.Stat. 6-1-105.

    10. An injunction issue enjoining DEFENDANT, its respective agents, servants,

    employees, representatives, and all of those acting in concert or participation with any of them

    who receive actual notice of such injunction from:

    (1) using in any manner, in whole or in part, the marks Booster and Booster

    Ball, or any colorable imitation thereof, including, but not limited to in connection with any

    sporting goods business, product or service or similar or related business, product or service;

    (2) falsely representing and/or passing off the business, goods and services of

    said DEFENDANT as being connected with Kwik Tek, its business and/or products, or engaging

    in any act which is likely to cause the trade or public in general, to believe that said

    DEFENDANT and/or its products or business with which it is connected, is in any way

    affiliated, associated, or connected with Kwik Tek or sponsored by Kwik Tek, its business

    10

    Case 1:15-cv-00159 Document 1 Filed 01/22/15 USDC Colorado Page 10 of 13

  • 8/9/2019 Kwik Tek v Nash Mfg. - Complaint

    11/29

    and/or products.

    (3) seeking to register with any federal, state or local agency or authority, any

    trade dress or trademark which is a colorable imitation of Kwik Teks Booster or Booster Ball

    marks.

    11. DEFENDANT cancel any federal or state trademark, trade name or trade dress

    registrations for or including any Booster or Booster Ball mark which is a colorable imitation

    of Kwik Teks Booster or Booster Ball marks.

    12. Kwik Tek be awarded its actual damages caused by DEFENDANTS false

    designation and representation of origin and deceptive trade practices, including Kwik Teks

    actual damages and any sum above that amount as the Court may find just according to the

    circumstances of the case, as well as DEFENDANTS profits realized by reason of

    DEFENDANTs unlawful acts as aforesaid.

    13. Kwik Tek be awarded treble the amount of its actual damages for

    DEFENDANTS willful and wanton conduct.

    14. Kwik Tek be awarded his costs and attorneys fees in bringing and maintaining

    this lawsuit.

    15. Kwik Tek be granted such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and

    equitable.

    A JURY TRIAL IS REQUESTED.

    DATED this 22nd day of January, 2015.

    s/ Brian D. SmithBrian D. Smith, Esq.

    BRIAN D. SMITH, P.C.

    4100 E. Mississippi Ave., Suite 1600Denver, Colorado 80246

    11

    Case 1:15-cv-00159 Document 1 Filed 01/22/15 USDC Colorado Page 11 of 13

  • 8/9/2019 Kwik Tek v Nash Mfg. - Complaint

    12/29

    (303) 523-0900

    ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF KWIK

    TEK INC.

    12

    Case 1:15-cv-00159 Document 1 Filed 01/22/15 USDC Colorado Page 12 of 13

  • 8/9/2019 Kwik Tek v Nash Mfg. - Complaint

    13/29

    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

    I hereby certify that on January 22, 2015, I electronically filed the foregoing

    COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIALwith the Clerk of Court using the

    CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the parties of record.

    /s/ Brian D. Smith

    13

    Case 1:15-cv-00159 Document 1 Filed 01/22/15 USDC Colorado Page 13 of 13

  • 8/9/2019 Kwik Tek v Nash Mfg. - Complaint

    14/29

    Exhibit A

    Case 1:15-cv-00159 Document 1-1 Filed 01/22/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4

  • 8/9/2019 Kwik Tek v Nash Mfg. - Complaint

    15/29

    Case 1:15-cv-00159 Document 1-1 Filed 01/22/15 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 4

  • 8/9/2019 Kwik Tek v Nash Mfg. - Complaint

    16/29

    Case 1:15-cv-00159 Document 1-1 Filed 01/22/15 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 4

  • 8/9/2019 Kwik Tek v Nash Mfg. - Complaint

    17/29

    Case 1:15-cv-00159 Document 1-1 Filed 01/22/15 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 4

  • 8/9/2019 Kwik Tek v Nash Mfg. - Complaint

    18/29

    Exhibit B

    Case 1:15-cv-00159 Document 1-2 Filed 01/22/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2

  • 8/9/2019 Kwik Tek v Nash Mfg. - Complaint

    19/29

    1/8/2015 Booster Balls - Ropes / Harnesses - Boating

    http://www.airhead.com/boating/ropes-harnesses/booster-balls.html

    Home > Boating > Ropes / Harnesses > Booster Balls

    Booster Balls

    SHOPPING OPTIONS

    Price

    $119.98 - $119.98(1)

    $125.99 - $125.99(1)

    Brand

    Airhead(1)

    Sportsstuff(1)

    $125.99

    4k Booster Ball

    4k Booster Ball Inflatable Tow Rope

    Buoy ADVANCED TOWING SYS...1 Review(s)

    $119.98

    BOB

    BOB Tow Rope Inflatable Buoy What

    about BOB? BOB is an advan...

    SHOP BY

    Case 1:15-cv-00159 Document 1-2 Filed 01/22/15 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2

    http://www.airhead.com/boating/ropes-harnesses/booster-balls.html?manufacturer=44http://www.airhead.com/boating/ropes-harnesses/booster-balls.html?manufacturer=44http://www.airhead.com/boating/ropes-harnesses/booster-balls.html?manufacturer=44http://www.airhead.com/boating/ropes-harnesses/booster-balls/4k-booster-ball.htmlhttp://www.airhead.com/boating/ropes-harnesses/booster-balls/4k-booster-ball.htmlhttp://www.airhead.com/boating/ropes-harnesses/booster-balls/4k-booster-ball.htmlhttp://www.airhead.com/boating/ropes-harnesses/booster-balls/4k-booster-ball.htmlhttp://www.airhead.com/boating/ropes-harnesses/booster-balls/4k-booster-ball.htmlhttp://www.airhead.com/boating/ropes-harnesses/booster-balls/bob.htmlhttp://www.airhead.com/boating/ropes-harnesses/booster-balls/bob.htmlhttp://www.airhead.com/boating/ropes-harnesses/booster-balls/bob.htmlhttp://www.airhead.com/boating/ropes-harnesses/booster-balls/bob.htmlhttp://www.airhead.com/boating/ropes-harnesses/booster-balls/4k-booster-ball.htmlhttp://www.airhead.com/boating/ropes-harnesses/booster-balls/4k-booster-ball.htmlhttp://www.airhead.com/boating/ropes-harnesses/booster-balls.html?price=125.99-125.99http://www.airhead.com/boating/ropes-harnesses.htmlhttp://www.airhead.com/boating/ropes-harnesses/booster-balls.html?manufacturer=45http://www.airhead.com/boating/ropes-harnesses/booster-balls/bob.htmlhttp://www.airhead.com/boating/ropes-harnesses/booster-balls.html?price=119.98-119.98http://www.airhead.com/boating/ropes-harnesses/booster-balls.html?manufacturer=44http://www.airhead.com/boating/ropes-harnesses/booster-balls/bob.htmlhttp://www.airhead.com/boating.htmlhttp://www.airhead.com/http://www.airhead.com/boating/ropes-harnesses/booster-balls/4k-booster-ball.html
  • 8/9/2019 Kwik Tek v Nash Mfg. - Complaint

    20/29

    Exhibit C

    Case 1:15-cv-00159 Document 1-3 Filed 01/22/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2

  • 8/9/2019 Kwik Tek v Nash Mfg. - Complaint

    21/29

    Case 1:15-cv-00159 Document 1-3 Filed 01/22/15 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2

  • 8/9/2019 Kwik Tek v Nash Mfg. - Complaint

    22/29

    Exhibit D

    Case 1:15-cv-00159 Document 1-4 Filed 01/22/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2

  • 8/9/2019 Kwik Tek v Nash Mfg. - Complaint

    23/29

    From:partenk@_.com

    Sent:Tuesday, January 13, 2015 6:29 PM

    To:Aaron@_.com; bsmith@_.com

    Cc:eric@_.net

    Subject:Re: Hydroslide Arsenal Power Ball

    Aaron / Brian / Eric,We do not infringe in any way. If you want to call anddiscuss with my attorney the cost of the conversation willbe yours.

    Thanks,

    Keith PartenNash Mfg. Inc.

    Case 1:15-cv-00159 Document 1-4 Filed 01/22/15 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2

  • 8/9/2019 Kwik Tek v Nash Mfg. - Complaint

    24/29

    Exhibit E

    Case 1:15-cv-00159 Document 1-5 Filed 01/22/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5

  • 8/9/2019 Kwik Tek v Nash Mfg. - Complaint

    25/29

    Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) filing receipt

    YOUR MARK:BOOSTER (Standard Characters, mark.jpg)1.The literal element of the mark consists of BOOSTER.The mark consists of standard characters, without claim to any particular font, style, size, or

    color.

    YOUR SERIAL NUMBER: We have received your U.S. Trademark Application and assigned2.serial number '86510259' to your submission. A summary of your application data is provided at

    the bottom of this message and serves as your official filing receipt. Please keep a copy of thisinformation for your records. All correspondence concerning the application should reference

    your assigned serial number.

    Please read all of the important information below. Not every mark is registrable with the

    USPTO and we do not refund the application filing fee(s) if a registration does not ultimatelyissue.

    RECEIVING E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS/FILING DOCUMENTS ON-LINE: Because3.you have authorized receipt of correspondence by e-mail, please make sure that your server willaccept USPTO e-mail and not treat it as SPAM. If you must submit correspondence to us, please

    use the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) forms, available athttp://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/index.jsp.

    KEEP YOUR ADDRESS CURRENT IN USPTO RECORDS: We do not extend filing4.deadlines due to a failure to receive USPTO mailings/e-mailings. You must update thecorrespondence and/or owner's address if a postal address and/or e-mail address changes, usingthe form(s) available at http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.

    WARNING ABOUT UNSOLICITED COMMUNICATIONS: You may receive trademark-5.related communications from private companies not associated with the USPTO. These

    communications frequently display customer-specific information, including your USPTO serialnumber or registration number and owner name, and request fees for trademark-related services,such as monitoring, listings in international publications, and document filing. None of the

    companies offering these services are affiliated with the USPTO or any other federal agency. Allofficial correspondence will be from the "United States Patent and Trademark Office" in

    Alexandria, VA, and if by e-mail, specifically from the domain "@uspto.gov." Please consult the

    "Warning" page on the Trademarks section of the USPTO's website for further informationabout unsolicited communications and to view representative examples of them. For generalinformation on filing and maintenance requirements for trademark applications and registrations,including fees required by law, please consult www.uspto.gov, contact the

    [email protected] telephone 1-800-786-9199.

    LEGAL EXAMINATION PROCESS: Your application is now pending examination. In6.approximately 3 months, your application will be assigned to a USPTO examining attorney for

    review. The application cannot mature into a registration unless all legal requirements are met,

    Case 1:15-cv-00159 Document 1-5 Filed 01/22/15 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 5

    mailto:[email protected]://www.uspto.gov/http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsphttp://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/index.jsp
  • 8/9/2019 Kwik Tek v Nash Mfg. - Complaint

    26/29

    and many applications never satisfy these requirements and therefore never register. The overallprocess can take up to 18 months.

    CHECK STATUS AND REVIEW DOCUMENTS OR YOUR APPLICATION MAY BE7.UNINTENTIONALLY ABANDONED: You mustcheck the status and review all documentsassociated with your application at least every 3-4 months using Trademark Status and

    Document Retrieval (TSDR), available at http://tsdr.uspto.gov/.

    Promptly e-mail the [email protected] telephone 1-800-786-9199

    (select option #1) if an Office action (letter from the USPTO) or notice has issued for yourapplication that you did not receive or do not understand. Failure to respond timely to any Office

    action or notice may result in the abandonment of your application, requiring you to pay anadditional fee to have your application revived even if you did not receive the Office action ornotice.

    FILING ERRORS: If you discover an error in the application data, you must file a Voluntary8.Amendment at http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/miscellaneous.jsp. Do notsubmit any

    proposed amendment to [email protected], because the TEAS technical support team may not

    make any data changes. Please wait approximately 7 days after the filing date of your applicationto submit a Voluntary Amendment in order to allow for initial upload of your application data

    into the USPTO database. The assigned examining attorney will determine the acceptability ofany Voluntary Amendment during examination. Not all errors may be corrected. For example, if

    you submitted the wrong mark or if the proposed correction would be considered a materialalteration to your original filing, it will not be accepted. In this situation, your only recoursewould be to file a new application, with a new fee and no refund of your original filing fee.

    REQUEST FOR REFUND AND/OR CANCELLATION: Since your application has already9.been assigned a serial number, please do not contact [email protected] request a refund or to

    cancel the filing. We will only cancel the filing and refund the filing fee if the application does

    not meet minimum filing requirements. The fee is a processing fee that the USPTO does notrefund, even if your mark does not proceed to registration.

    In the limited situation where you inadvertently filed identical applications, one immediatelyafter the other, because no confirmation of the first filing was received, please provide both serial

    numbers to the technical support team at [email protected].

    SelectUSA: The United States represents the largest, most dynamic marketplace in the world10.and is an unparalleled location for business investment, innovation, and commercialization ofnew technologies. The U.S. offers tremendous resources and advantages for those who investand manufacture goods here. Through SelectUSA, our nation works to promote and facilitate

    business investment. SelectUSA provides information assistance to the international investor

    community; serves as an ombudsman for existing and potential investors; advocates on behalf ofU.S. cities, states, and regions competing for global investment; and counsels U.S. economicdevelopment organizations on investment attraction best practices. To learn more about why the

    United States is the best country in the world to develop technology, manufacture products,deliver services, and grow your business, visit SelectUSA.govor call +1-202-482-6800.

    SUMMARY OF APPLICATION DATA FOLLOWS:

    Case 1:15-cv-00159 Document 1-5 Filed 01/22/15 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 5

    http://www.selectusa.gov/mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/miscellaneous.jspmailto:[email protected]://tsdr.uspto.gov/
  • 8/9/2019 Kwik Tek v Nash Mfg. - Complaint

    27/29

    APPLICATION DATA: You have filed a Trademark/Service Mark Application for registration

    on the Principal Registerusing a regular TEAS application form.

    The applicant, Kwik Tek, Inc., a corporation of Colorado, having an address of

    12000 East 45th Ave. Unit 104

    Denver, Colorado 80239 United States

    requests registration of the trademark/service mark identified above in the United States Patent and

    Trademark Office on the Principal Register established by the Act of July 5, 1946 (15 U.S.C. Section1051 et seq.), as amended, for the following:

    International Class 028: Low Drag Aquatic Towing System

    In International Class 028, the mark was first used by the applicant or the applicant's related company

    or licensee or predecessor in interest at least as early as 07/28/2008, and first used in commerce at leastas early as 07/28/2008, and is now in use in such commerce. The applicant is submitting one(or more)

    specimen(s) showing the mark as used in commerce on or in connection with any item in the class oflisted goods and/or services, consisting of a(n) Photo of Booster in retail packaging.

    Specimen-1 [SPE00-2071732484-20150121184424172264_._Booster.jpg ]

    For informational purposes only, applicant's website address is: www.kwiktek.com

    The applicant's current Correspondence Information:

    Kwik Tek, Inc

    12000 East 45th Ave. Unit 104

    Denver, Colorado 80239 3033773722(phone)

    3037338007(fax)

    [email protected];[email protected] (authorized)

    A fee payment in the amount of $325 has been submitted with the application, representing paymentfor 1 class(es).

    Declaration

    The signatory believes that: if the applicant is filing the application under 15 U.S.C. Section 1051(a),

    the applicant is the owner of the trademark/service mark sought to be registered; the applicant or theapplicant's related company or licensee is using the mark in commerce on or in connection with the

    goods/services in the application, and such use by the applicant's related company or licensee inures tothe benefit of the applicant; the specimen(s) shows the mark as used on or in connection with thegoods/services in the application; and/or if the applicant filed an application under 15 U.S.C. Section

    1051(b), Section 1126(d), and/or Section 1126(e), the applicant is entitled to use the mark incommerce; the applicant has a bona fide intention to use or use through the applicant's related

    company or licensee the mark in commerce on or in connection with the goods/services in the

    Case 1:15-cv-00159 Document 1-5 Filed 01/22/15 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 5

  • 8/9/2019 Kwik Tek v Nash Mfg. - Complaint

    28/29

    application. The signatory believes that to the best of the signatory's knowledge and belief, no otherperson has the right to use the mark in commerce, either in the identical form or in such nearresemblance as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods/services of such other

    person, to cause confusion or mistake, or to deceive. The signatory being warned that willful falsestatements and the like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. Section 1001,

    and that such willful false statements and the like may jeopardize the validity of the application or any

    registration resulting therefrom, declares that all statements made of his/her own knowledge are trueand all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true.

    Declaration Signature

    Signature: /Mike Pleiss/ Date: 01/21/2015Signatory's Name: Mike Pleiss

    Signatory's Position: Marketing Director

    Thank you,

    The TEAS support teamWed Jan 21 19:22:49 EST 2015STAMP: USPTO/BAS-207.173.248.4-20150121192249516910-86510259-

    5309178ab589a7fa61eab12c2fd1696e1b81de772912946fcab84bfb871290a432-CC-5366-20150121184424172264

    Case 1:15-cv-00159 Document 1-5 Filed 01/22/15 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 5

  • 8/9/2019 Kwik Tek v Nash Mfg. - Complaint

    29/29

    JS 44 (Rev. 12/11)

    he JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law, except

    rovided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the

    f initiating the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.)

    . (a) DEFENDANTS

    County of Residence of First Listed Defendant

    (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY)

    IN LAND CONDEMNATION CASES, USE THE LOCATION

    TRACT OF LAND INVOLVED.

    (c) Attorneys (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number) Attorneys (If Known)

    I. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Place an X in One Box Only) III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Place an X in One Box fo(For Diversity Cases Only)

    1 U.S. Government 3 Federal Question PTF DEF PTF DPlaintiff (U.S. Government Not a Party)

    Citizen of This State 1 1 Incorporated or Principal Place 4of Business In This State

    2 U.S. Government 4 Diversity Citizen of Another State 2 2 Incorporated and Principal Place 5

    Defendant (Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III) of Business In Another State

    Citizen or Subject of a 3 3 Foreign Nation 6

    Foreign Country

    (Place an X in One Box Only)CONTRACT TORTS FORFEITURE/PENALTY BANKRUPTCY OTHER STATUTE

    110 Insurance PERSONAL INJURY PERSONAL INJURY 625 Drug Related Seizure 422 Appeal 28 USC 158 375 False Claims Act

    120 Marine 310 Airplane 365 Personal Injury - of Property 21 USC 881 423 Withdrawal 400 State Reapportionm

    130 Miller Act 315 Airplane Product Product Liability690 Other

    28 USC 157 410 Antitrust

    140 Negotiable Instrument Liability 367 Health Care/ 430 Banks and Banking

    150 Recovery of Overpayment320 Assault, Libel & Pharmaceutical PROPERTY RIGHTS

    450 Commerce& Enforcement of Judgment

    Slander Personal Injury 820 Copyrights

    460 Deportation151 Medicare Act

    330 Federal Employers Product Liability 830 Patent

    470 Racketeer Influenc152 Recovery of Defaulted

    Liability 368 Asbestos Personal 840 Trademark

    Corrupt Organizatio340 Marine

    Injury Product Liability

    480 Consumer Credit345 Marine Product

    LABOR SOCIAL SECURITY

    490 Cable/Sat TV

    153 Recovery of Overpayment LiabilityPERSONAL PROPERTY 710 Fair Labor Standards 861 HIA (1395ff)

    850 Securities/Commod

    of Veterans Benefits350 Motor Vehicle 370 Other Fraud Act

    862 Black Lung (923)

    Exchange160 Stockholders Suits

    355 Motor Vehicle 371 Truth in Lending 720 Labor/Mgmt. Relations863 DIWC/DIWW (405(g))

    890 Other Statutory Ac190 Other Contract

    Product Liability 380 Other Personal740 Railway Labor Act 864 SSID Title XVI

    891 Agricultural Acts195 Contract Product Liability

    Property Damage751 Family and Medical 865 RSI (405(g))

    893 Environmental Mat

    385 Property Damage Leave Act

    895 Freedom of Inform

    362 Personal Injury -Product Liability

    790 Other Labor LitigationMed. Malpractice

    791 Empl. Ret. Inc.

    896 Arbitration

    REAL PROPERTY CIVIL RIGHTS PRISONER PETITIONS

    Security Act

    TAX SUITS

    899 Administrative Pro

    210 Land Condemnation 440 Other Civil Rights

    510 Motions to Vacate

    870 Taxes (U.S. Plaintiff

    Act/Review or Appe

    220 Foreclosure 441 Voting

    Sentence

    or Defendant)

    Agency Decision

    230 Rent Lease & Ejectment 442 Employment

    Habeas Corpus:

    871 IRS - Third Party

    950 Constitutionality of

    240 Torts to Land 443 Housing/530 General

    26 USC 7609

    State Statutes

    245 Tort Product Liability Accommodations535 Death Penalty

    IMMIGRATION

    290 All Other Real Property445 Amer. w/Disabilities -

    540 Mandamus & Other

    462 Naturalization Application

    Employment

    550 Civil Rights

    446 Amer. w/Disabilities -

    555 Prison Condition

    Other

    560 Civil Detainee -

    448 Education

    Conditions of Confinement

    465 Other Immigration

    Actions

    V. ORIGIN

    Transferred fromanother district(specify)

    (Place an X in One Box Only)

    1 OriginalProceeding

    2 Removed fromState Court

    3 Remanded fromAppellate Court

    4 Reinstated orReopened

    5 6 MultidistrictLitigation

    VI. CAUSE OF ACTION

    VII. REQUESTED IN

    COMPLAINT:

    CHECK IF THIS IS A CLASS ACTION

    UNDER F.R.C.P. 23

    CHECK YES only if demanded in complaint

    No

    Appeal to D

    Judge fromMagistrate J

    7

    Cite the U.S. Civil Statute under which you are filing (Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity):

    Brief description of cause: AP Docket

    NOTE:

    and One Box for Defendant)

    196 Franchise

    Student Loans (Excl. Veterans)

    360 Other Personal Injury

    District of Colorado Form CIVIL COVER SHEET

    (b) County of Residence of First Listed Plaintiff(EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES)

    PLAINTIFFS

    V. NATURE OF SUIT

    DEMAND $ JURY DEMAND: Yes

    463 Alien Detainee

    Other:

    Brian D. Smith, P.C., 4100 E. Mississippi Ave., Denver, CO 80246

    Phone: 303-523-0900

    NASH MANUFACTURING INC.

    35 USC Section 271 et seq.

    KWIK TEK INC.

    Denver

    Patent Infringement and Unfair Competition

    Case 1:15-cv-00159 Document 1-6 Filed 01/22/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1


Related Documents