29 junio 11

Maniobra de Hamilton

¿Evidencia?

Boulvain M, Stan CM, Irion O. Membrane sweeping for induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD000451. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011 Issue 6, Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Colla-boration.

Bricker L, Luckas M. Amniotomy alone for induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2000, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD002862. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011 Issue 6, Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration.

Smyth RMD, Alldred SK, Markham C. Amniotomy for shortening spontaneous labour. Cochrane Database of Systema-tic Reviews 2007, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD006167. The Cochrane Collaboration, currently published in The Cochrane Database of Sys-tematic Reviews 2011 Issue 6, Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration.

Conclusiones de los autores De acuerdo con los resultados de esta revisión, no es posible recomendar la introducción de la amniotomía sistemática co-mo parte del tratamiento y el cuidado durante el trabajo de parto. Se recomienda que las pruebas presentadas en esta re-visión estén disponibles para las mujeres a quienes se les ofrece la amniotomía, y podrían resultar útiles como base parala discusión, y para las decisiones tomadas entre las pacientes y los cuidadores.

Howarth G, Botha DJ. Amniotomy plus intravenous oxytocin for induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Syste-matic Reviews 2001, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD003250. The Cochrane Collaboration, currently published in The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011 Issue 6, Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration.

Hofmeyr GJ, Gülmezoglu AM, Pileggi C. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 10. Art. No.: CD000941. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011 Issue 6, Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration.

Hofmeyr GJ, Gülmezoglu AM, Pileggi C. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 10. Art. No.: CD000941. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011 Issue 6, Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration.

Hofmeyr GJ, Gülmezoglu AM, Pileggi C. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 10. Art. No.: CD000941. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011 Issue 6, Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration.

Hofmeyr GJ, Gülmezoglu AM, Pileggi C. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 10. Art. No.: CD000941. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011 Issue 6, Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration.

Hofmeyr GJ, Gülmezoglu AM, Pileggi C. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 10. Art. No.: CD000941. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011 Issue 6, Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration.

Hofmeyr GJ, Gülmezoglu AM, Pileggi C. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 10. Art. No.: CD000941. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011 Issue 6, Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration.

Kavanagh J, Kelly AJ, Thomas J. Breast stimulation for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD003392. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011 Issue 6, Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration.

MADRID, 21 Jun.

Misoprostol y teratogenicidad: Revisión de la evidencia. Informe de una reunión organizada por el Population Council New York, New York 22 de mayo de 2002. En: http://www.gynuity.org/documents/miso_terat_sp.pdf.Osorio A, y col. Embriopatías asociadas al uso de misoprostol. Casos Clínicos. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol ©2007;72(5):346-351.

Embriotoxicidad del misoprostol

Síndrome de Moebius

Evidence Report/Technology Assessment Number 176. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. March 2009.

Evidence Report/Technology Assessment Number 176. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. March 2009.

Evidence Report/Technology Assessment Number 176. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. March 2009.

Evidence Report/Technology Assessment Number 176. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. March 2009.

Evidence Report/Technology Assessment Number 176. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. March 2009.

EAC OR 95% CI P

Ingreso a la UCIN 3 1.24 0.73 – 2.09 0.43

Muerte neonatal 6* – – –

Sólo cuatro muertes neonatales en el grupo de conducta expectante y no hubo en el de inducción electiva.

Evidence Report/Technology Assessment Number 176. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. March 2009.

Evidence Report/Technology Assessment Number 176. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. March 2009.

.

Bahn SA, Jacobson J, Petersen F

(Obstet Gynecol. ©1998 Sep;92(3):403-7)

Bahn SA, Jacobson J, Petersen F

(Obstet Gynecol. ©1998 Sep;92(3):403-7)

Todos somos muy ignorantes. Lo que ocurre es que no todos ignoramos las mismas cosas.