Environmental Monitoring Report · system (G-PAD-M-70-018) and the commissioning procedures for the cooling tower, since it is indicated that the dependence of the outdoor air temperature

Environmental Monitoring Report Semestral Report January – November 2017 December 2017

UZB: Talimarjan Power Project Prepared by State Joint Stock Company Uzbekenergo for the Republic of Uzbekistan and the Asian Development Bank. This environmental monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation

of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian

Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any

territory or area.

Final Environmental Monitoring Report

Project Number: 43151-023

Loan Number: 2629-UZB

Reporting period: January – November 2017

UZBEKISTAN: Talimarjan Power Project (FINANCED BY: The Asian Development Bank)

Prepared by: Ms. Diana Rakhimova, PMU

in cooperation with: CS-MM, Expert, Mr. Nizom Rakhimov (TPP) Environmental Expert

For: Executing Agency - Uzbekenergo

Endorsed by: Mr.Olim Yusupov, PMU Manager

December 2017

Final Environmental Report (Jan-Sept 2017)

Talimarjan Power Project

2

Table of Contents

PART I - INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 4

PART II - ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING............................................................................................ 11

2.1 NOISE .......................................................................................................................................................... 12 2.7 FLORA AND FAUNA MONITORING ................................................................................................................ 15

PART III ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT .......................................................................................... 16

3.1 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (EMS), SITE SPECIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN, AND WORK PLAN ................................................................................................................................................ 16 61. LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF QUARTERLY REPORTS TO THE NISHON

BRANCH OF KASKADARYANSKI REGIONAL ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE ACCORDING TO TERMS AND

CONDITIONS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE ECOLOGICAL EXPERTISE REVIEW. THE PMU WAS SUBMITTING

QUARTERLY REPORTS TO THE NISHON BRANCH OF THE COMMITTEE. ............................................................ 17 3.5 CONSULTATION AND COMPLAINTS .............................................................................................................. 22

ANNEXES ..................................................................................................................................................... 23

ANNEX 1. NOISE MONITORING DATA EXTRACTED FROM THE HDEC MONTHLY ENVİRONMENTAL REPORT OF

JANUARY-MARCH 2017 .................................................................................................................................... 23 ANNEX 8. SITE PHOTOS .................................................................................................................................... 59 POST-CONSTRUCTION ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT CHECKLIST ............................... ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED.



3

ABBREVIATIONS

ADB Asian Development Bank

CS-MM Corporate Solutions and Mott MacDonald Team

CCGT Combined Cycle Gas Turbine

CSCL Corporate Solutions Consulting Ltd

DMF Design and Monitoring Framework

DRM Design Review Meeting

EA Executing Agency

EIA Environmental Impact Assessment

EMP Environmental Management Plan

EPC Engineering Procurement Construction

GoU Government of Uzbekistan

GTG Gas Turbine Generator

HDEC Consortium of Hyundai and Daewoo

H&S Health & Safety

HSE Health, Safety, and Environment

HRSG Heat Recovery Steam Generator

HVAC Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning

IA Implementing Agency

IC Implementation Consultant

IAS International Accounting Standards

IFI International Financial Institution

ISO International Organisation for Standardisation

JICA Japan International Cooperation Agency

MFERIT Ministry for Economic Relations and International Trade

MoM Minutes of Meeting

MPR Monthly Progress Report

PAM Project Administration Manual

PFS Project Financial Statements

PMU Project Implementation Unit

PPE Personal Protective Equipment

PPMS Project Performance Monitoring System

STG Steam Turbine Generator

TPP Talimarjan Power Project

UE SJSC UzbekeEnergo

UFRD Fund for Reconstruction and Development of the Republic of Uzbekistan

UZS Uzbekistan Som (currency unit)

VAT Value Added Tax

WA Withdrawal Application

ZEP Zone Environmentally Protected -Environmental Effects/Impact Statement

ПДВ Maximum permitted emissions to air

ПДО Maximum permitted waste disposal

ПДС Maximum permitted water discharges



4

PART I - INTRODUCTION

1.1 General information about the project

1. The Government of Uzbekistan has received a loan from the ADB to part finance the construction of the Talimarjan Clean Power Project (the project) - a combined cycle gas generation plant. The project is located in Kashkadarya Province of Uzbekistan, 440 km south west of Tashkent. The site is an existing power plant, which currently generates 800 megawatts (MW). The project will install two combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT) units of about 450 MW each at the site.

2. Construction of CCGT units is planned for the expansion of TPP to improve the overall efficiency and environmental performance of Uzbekenergo’s generating activities across the country. The most advanced and efficient CCGT units available in the 370-450 MW range were considered for this project.

3. Based on ADB's safeguards policy statement (SPS), the Project is classified as follows: (i) environment (category A) – environmental impact assessment (EIA), (ii) involuntary resettlement (category C) – no actions, and (iii) indigenous peoples (category C) – no actions. Therefore, an environmental clearance from ADB was obtained in December 2009.

4. According to the Decree of the Cabinet of Ministry of Republic of Uzbekistan № 491 “On government ecological expertise”, the Project was classified as a class 1 Project under the Uzbekistan Environmental Legislation. The environmental clearance was obtained from the Nature Protection Committee (NPC) on 5 October 2009. Moreover, in order to comply with environmental legislations of the Republic of Uzbekistan, a new Conclusion of Ecological Expertise № 18/768 was received on 13 August 2013 from the State Nature Protection Committee for the project.

5. The State Committee for Nature Protection, Kashkadaria regional committee for nature protection, was given the responsibility to oversee compliance to the local environmental legislations on the protection of nature during the project implementation.

6. The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) was prepared to meet the requirements of the Uzbekistan Environmental Legislation as well as the ADB’s environment policy requirements. The EIA was published on 15 December 2009. Two rounds of public consultations were held prior to project appraisal. The environmental sensitivity of the Project site and its surrounding areas is low. Town of Nuristan is the only community close to the plant where the employees of Talimarjan TPP live. The nearest settlements are over 5 km away. The Project's key environmental issues were identified as Emissions to ambient air, noise impacts on the Nuristan settlement and waste management. 7. Commissioning of the project started in August 2016 and the two units (unit 2 and unit 3) were put into operation in March 2017. Commissioning of equipment was ongoing during the construction phase, and continued until final handover of the CCGT plant by the Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) contractor. Commissioning activities included test running of the CCGT equipment to ensure that it meets performance guarantee requirements, in particular the rated electrical output, efficiency and the emission of airborne contaminants and noise, and performance of the cooling system and other ancillary plant at relevant loads. 8. The Supervision Consultant left the site in September 2017. The Construction Contractor (Hyundai) is available until March 2019 for post-construction cleanup and maintenance works.



5

9.The purpose of this final environmental monitoring report (EMR) is to satisfy the requirements of environmental safeguard systems of Uzbekistan and the Asian Development Bank (Safeguard Policy Statement (2009) as well as to fulfil the requirements stipulated in the loan agreement between ADB and the Government of the Republic of Uzbekistan.

10. This EMR provides information on the progress of implementation of the Site-Specific Environmental Management Plan and Environmental Monitoring Plan (EMP), as required by the Environmental Impact Assessment report. This Final EMR covers the period January-November 2017 and includes construction, commissioning and operation stages of the project. The report has been prepared jointly by the Project Implementation Unit (PMU) and the project implementation consultant, Corporate Solutions and Mott MacDonald (CS-MM) on the basis of: (1) monthly progress reports and quarterly environmental monitoring reports of the Contractor; (2) post-construction environmental audit report and filled up Post-Construction Environmental Checklist of Supervision Consultant (see Annex 11); and (3) other information obtained from the Contractor.

1.2 Construction Activities and Project Progress

11. During this reporting period, the Project was completed in March 2017 and an official completion ceremony was held on the 29th August 2017. Below is a summary of the construction completion activities and project progress during the reporting period:

� CCGT1 (Unit 2) has been commissioned and performance tests were done. The reliability tests were accomplished as well.

� CCGT2 (Unit 3) has been commissioned and performance tests were done in March 2017. Reliability tests were accomplished as well.

� Steam Turbine of Unit 2 tripped because of high vibration. The Vendor came up and made the alignments again.

� Steam Turbine of Unit 3 also tripped because of high vibration. The vendor arrived and re-did the alignments. Construction works in CCGT1 (Unit 2) and CCGT2 (Unit 3) are completed. Punch clearing and NCR closing activities were completed in November 2017 by the Construction Contractor. In the cooling tower, the pre-commissioning activities finished and punch clearing, NCR closing activities completed. However, the performance test will be done in the winter 2018 according to the instructions on the operation of the circulating water supply system (G-PAD-M-70-018) and the commissioning procedures for the cooling tower, since it is indicated that the dependence of the outdoor air temperature is calculated for the operation of cooling towers in various cooling water parameters.

� In the intake facility, there was a concrete differential settlement occurred due to lack of good compaction of the sub base. The EPC Contractor brought a subcontractor to inject high pressure concrete to stop differential settlement and cracks in the concrete.

12. As it was mentioned above the Construction Contractor (Hyundai) is available until March 2019 (during the liability period) and will be responsible for punch clearing and NCR closing activities including post-construction cleanup and maintenance works. Monitoring measurements for noise, water consumption, wastewater, emissions, etc. during the operation phase will be performed by the TPP Laboratory.

13. More detailed information relating to the commissioning of different facilities is given in the Table 1 below:



6

Table 1: project progress-commissioning activities

# Activities

1. CCPP-1: Power unit commissioned for operation. The working committee Act has been finalized.

2. Gas turbine and generator:

- Initial firing carried out – 10.08.2016; - Cranking carried out achieving 3000 rpm – 12.08.2016; - Synchronization carried out with power output of 16 MW – 13.08.2016; - Load received 25% (80MW) - 17.08.2016; - Load received 230 MW - 20.08.2016; - Load received 318 MW - 26.08.2016; - GTG-1 power load = 310 MW – 17.11.2017;

3. Total power output of GTG-1 2838.9 mil. kWh

4. Steam turbine and generator:

Steam turbine installed on the turning gear – 21.10.2016;

- Steam blowing of bypass steam pipelines system of ST – 04.11.2016;

- ST start from rest n =1230 rpm – 05.11.2016;

- ST Rotor frequency =3000 rpm – 06.11.2016;

- Energizing the ST generator =7.9 MW (1000-1028) – 07.11.2016;

- STG-1 power load = 142 MW – 17.11.2017; -

5. Total power output of STG-1 - 1200.9 mil. kWh

6. CCPP-1 operation in combined cycle (since November 7, 2016)

7. CCPP-1 power load = 452.0 MW - 17.11.2017;

8. Total power output of CCPP-1 - 4039.8 mil kWh

9. CCPP-2: Power unit commissioned for operation. The working committee Act has been finalized.

10. Gas turbine and generator:

- Gas turbine installed on the turning gear (November 5, 2016);

- GT rotation n=700 rpm, pipeline flushing – November 9, 2016;

- GT Preliminary run at 3000 rpm and GT firing conducted on November 10, 2016

- GT startup & hook up into network N=16MW (5%) – November 12, 2016;

- GTG-2 power load = 314 MW – 17.11.2017;

11. Total power output of GTG-2 - 2227.6 mil. kWh

12. Total power output of STG-2 - 771.0 mil. kWh



7

13. CCPP-2 operation in combined cycle (since February 15, 2017)

14. CCPP-2 power load = 459 MW - 17.11.2017;

15. Total power output of CCPP-2 - 2998.65 mil kWh

16. Total power output of CCPP-1, 2 as of November 16, 2017 is 7038.5 mil. kWh

13. The State Acceptance Committee’s Act for operational commissioning of the completed facilities of Two Combined Cycle Power Plants 450 MW each in Talimarjan TPP has been approved by the Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated October 12, 2017, No. 1156-f.

1.3 Changes in project organization and environmental management team

15. The PMU and the CS-MM’s Organizational Structure has changed during this reporting period. Head of the Environmental Department JSC Uzbekenergo resigned from February 2017, this position is still empty. Starting in April 2017, EPC contractor’s HSE management were demobilized from the project. PGU Tupalang, KTI, RSG also demobilized from the site by end of March, 2017. 16. The following agencies are involved in implementing the project: JSC Uzbekenergo is the Executing Agency (EA) responsible for management, coordination and execution of all activities funded under the loan. JSC Uzbekenergo has overall responsibility for compliance with loan covenants.

17. JSC Uzbekenergo established a dedicated full-time Project Management Unit (PMU) responsible for management of the Talimarjan Power Project. The PMU manages the procurement and consulting contracts on behalf of JSC Uzbekenergo. The Director of the PMU reports directly to the Chairman of JSC Uzbekenergo. The PMU is the main point of contact for working communication between JSC Uzbekenergo and financing agencies. The PMU coordinates the consultants and contractors.

18. The PMU, assisted by the consultants, submits the necessary project plans, tender evaluation reports, progress reports, applications for withdrawal of funds, and any other required reports to ADB and the financing agencies.

19. PMU as responsible IA for the project recruited a Supervision Consultant (SC) – Corporate Solutions and Mott MacDonald (CS-MM). The national and international team of consultants assist PMU in the supervision of the construction of the overall implementation of the CCGT power project in accordance with all project technical and environmental safeguard requirements.

20. The SC also provides capacity building training to contractor staff in the management and operation and maintenance of the subprojects. The SC assists PMU in ensuring that the subprojects are implemented according to the specified standards. SC assignment also includes the supervising of the implementation of the environmental management plans.

21. All mitigation measures during construction have to be implemented by the EPC Contractor (HDEC) and the supervision consultant (SC) monitors these. To ensure the smooth implementation of EMP, an Environmental Management Specialist (EMS) is employed by the SC/CS-MM for performing routine observations and surveys, prepares quarterly environmental reports and submits these to PMU.

22. The EPC Contractor has the following obligations:

� to prepare SSEMP;



8

� to employ Environmental Consultant responsible for developing and implementing the construction phase SSEMP and for providing the corresponding information to PMU and SC;

� takes data (soil, noise, dust, water and wastewater quality and quantity, air quality) for effects monitoring.

23. The TPP Environmental Expert is responsible for undertaking monthly monitoring of CCGT construction activities.

24. The PMU reviews and analyses monthly environmental reports both from the EPC contractor and the Project Implementation and Supervision Consultant in order to evaluate the actual impacts arising from the implementation of the project, to monitor compliance with the requirements of this EIA and EMP, to identify non-compliance issues or adverse trends in results, and putting in place mitigation measures to correct any problems identified. The PMU gender/environment specialist regularly visits the Project site to confirm reports, and Talimarjan environmental specialist is on-site full-time.

25. The PMU, with assistance of project Implementation and Supervision Consultant, submits bi-annual environmental monitoring reports to ADB to ensure proper and timely implementation of the EMP and adherence to the agreed environmental covenants.

26. ADB is the donor financing the Investment Program. Environmental management organization is shown in Figure 1.

Fig. 1: Environmental management organization

27. Environmental Management team for the project during this reporting period is shown in Table 2.

Table 2: Environmental Management Team for the Project

Name Company Position Contact (email and/or tel.)

Ms.Diana Rakhimova

PMU Environmental/Social Expert

[email protected]

+998 93 555 0595

Nizom Rakhimov TPP Talimarjan Environmental expert +998 93 900 1936

Dr. L. Kusdemir CS-MM Team Leader [email protected]

EA

JS

C U

ZB

EK

EN

ER

GO

PMU Environmental/Social expert

TPP Talimarjan Environmental exper

SC (CSMM)

EPC Contractor HYUNDAI Local Environmental

specialist



9

Rajab Khojamuratov

CS-MM Deputy Team Leader [email protected]

Oybek Amanov Hyundai Local Environmental Officer

[email protected]

+998 90 639 5418

1.4 Relationship with contractor, owner, and lender 28. The project is implemented by the Executing Agency (EA), Uzbekenergo. It is under the control of a Project Management Unit (PMU), headed by a Project Director appointed by the EA. The PMU works closely with the corresponding departments within the existing TPP organization to achieve the necessary coordination and integration with the ongoing operation of TPP Unit 1.

29. The contractor (HDEC) was appointed in March 2013 as the EPC Contactor responsible for the design, supply, delivery, erection, testing, and commissioning of the two CCGT units. The contractor conducts environmental monitoring at site and prepares and submits monthly environmental monitoring report to the PMU. There are a number of sub-contractors for the implementation of the project, and the list of main companies working during this reporting period is shown in Table 3.

Table 3: Main companies working during the reporting period

Company Position Remarks

HDEC EPC Contractor Mostly Demobilized. Defect Liability, Commissioning Team stayed.

PGU Tupalang

Sub-Contractor for civil works De-Mobilized by end of March, 2017

KTI Sub-Contractor for piping work and welding

De-Mobilized by end of March, 2017

RCG Sub-Contractor of PGU Tupalang for HRSG, ST, GT erection

De-Mobilized by end of March, 2017

30. The Consultant’s contract was signed on 26 November 2011. The role of the Consultant is to help PMU assure that the plant is constructed to the standard specified in the EPC Contract, completed on schedule, and costs are monitored and controlled. The Consultant’s role covers design audit, monitoring of the Contractor’s works, issuance of necessary progress reports and payment certificates, and the provision of general project management. Audit of compliance with the site-based Environmental Management Plan and site monitoring are carried out on a monthly basis by the Consultant and monthly Environmental Reports are prepared and submitted to the PMU. Consultant also reviews the contractor’s monthly environmental report to identify any non-compliance issues and to evaluate environmental monitoring progress and prepare written comments to allow the PMU to control compliance with the site based Environmental Management Plan, and to be aware of any issues affecting the project.

31.Environmental and Social expert of CS-MM, environmental experts of TPP, the contractor and sub-contractors have met regularly to discuss and coordinate environmental concerns and agree corrective actions. CS-MM provided on the job training on environmental matters to the PMU environmental expert, contractor’s environmental expert and sub-contractor’s environmental experts.



10

32. To ensure proper and timely implementation of the EMP and adherence to the agreed environmental covenants, the ADB requires Uzbekenergo to submit bi-annual reports on the implementation of the EMP, and this requirement is reflected in the loan agreement. The PMU submits the bi-annual environmental monitoring reports to the ADB. The PMU also sends the bi-annual Environmental monitoring reports to the Kashkadarya Regional Committee of the Nature Protection for reference as well. 33. The PMU reviews and analyses monthly environmental reports both from the contractor and the CS-MM. However, as of end of March 2017, due to completion of construction activities HDEC stopped to submit monthly environmental reports. Supervision Consultant left the site in September 2017. Construction Contractor (Hyundai) is available until March 2019 for post-construction cleanup, maintenance works and correction of non-compliances.



11

PART II - ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING

34. In accordance with the EIA and the accompanying Environmental Monitoring Plan (EMP), the Contractor was required to undertake parametric measurements and observations on ambient air quality, emissions, water and wastewater quality, noise, dust and vibration during construction and operation periods. The monitoring regime should ensure that the energy usage and greenhouse gas emissions are calculated and verified in accordance with acceptable standards. The project need to undertake extensive and robust greenhouse gas monitoring for all emission sources. This will need to be compliant with (i) an integrated automated process monitoring and control system, and (ii) integration of the local digital monitoring and control systems of different equipment suppliers into a single control system. 35. The monitoring guidelines were set as shown in the Table 4 below for construction and operation stages accordingly:

Table 4: Parameters of monitoring measurements and frequency during construction and operation

Parameters Frequency of Measurements

Remarks

Construction Phase

Dust Weekly Monitor dust levels in the surrounding areas, and adjust or increase the frequency or intensity of control measures accordingly.

Performed by: Construction ecological expert and TP Lab.

Ambient air 6-Monthly Method used: DOAS or

Chemiluminescence;

Measured by: Contractor

Construction Noise Weekly Locations: Site boundary and most affected residence of Nuriston.

Measured by: Construction ecological expert.

Water consumption Weekly and monthly total Measured by: Construction Contractor.

Potable water quality Daily and Monthly Volumetric Control.

Measured by: TPP Lab.

Wastewater quality and quantity

Weekly BOD;

Daily COD and pH

Inlet and outlet to STP. Measured by TPP Lab and WWTP Operator.



12

Parameters to be measured: Suspended Solids, BOD5, Dissolve Oxygen, Oil Products, Coli Index.

Operation Phase

Water consumption Monthly totals TPP Lab

KMK Impacts

Daily Parameters to be measured: temperature, suspended solids, COD, pH, Dissolved solids, appearance. Measured by: TPP Lab.

Noise 6-Monthly 2 sensitive locations. Measured by: TPP Lab.

Ambient air 6-Monthly Parameters to be measured: NOx

Measured by: TPP Lab.

Emissions Monthly Parameters to be measured: NOx, Temperature, Oxygen, CO (Stack 1). Measured by: TPP Lab.

Industrial WWTP

Weekly Parameters to be measured: COD; pH, Suspended solids, Acidity.

Measured by: TPP Lab

2.1 Noise

36. During the construction period (Jan-Mar 2017) Contractor performed noise measurements using calibrated device at various locations of plant territory and the most affected residence of Nuriston. The monitoring results at the Nuriston community indicated that the noise level at and near the site are lower than limits set in Uzbekistan legislation but are higher than limits set by the WB/IFC. The maximum value of measured dBA was between 70 and 80 near the Power Block Area #1 and 2 and slightly exceeded WB/IFC standards near the settlement of Nuriston (maximum value of measured dBA was 62.9 dBA).

37. Based on monthly environmental monitoring and post-construction environmental monitoring results, during operation covering April-October 2017 period noise was not measured by TPP Lab due to absence of noise measurement device. It has been decided that before purchasing of noise device by TPP the CC will provide TPP Lab with noise device for conducting noise measurements at various locations of TPP and at Nuriston community as indicated in the monitoring plan of the EIA. In case of exceedances of IFC standards, the following mitigation measures will be applied:

• CCGT’s noise is expected to reduce with the installation of casing. (This assumption has been tasted with the CCGTs (Unit 2 and Unit 3) running during the commissioning period and all shortcomings on the appearance of the noise of the



13

power units No. 2, No. 3 have been eliminated. At this time, the noise level is normal.

• Installation of air silencer at the outlet of HRSG.

38. The results of noise measurements performed during construction period (January-March 2017) are given in Annex 1.

39. As per ADB Mission request, TPP Lab conducted noise measurements during operation period both at various points of TPP industrial zone (TCA Cooler, Steam turbine, Heat Recovery Steam Generator, GT Generator & Gas Turbine, and far field) and near the settlement (far field) in November 2017 using Contractor’s noise measurement device. According to measurement data, noise measured in the far field was between 40-51 dBA, which is in line with the requirements of IFC/WB requirements/standards. Consequently, no mitigation measures have been implemented within the project. The results of noise measurements performed during operation period (Nov-2017) are given in Annex 1. 2.2 Water consumption and quality 40. The area surrounding the TPP has no natural surface water features and the manmade structures, such as the irrigation canal, have low environmental values. The potential risks to surface water features from the construction of the new turbines are therefore low, which is why the EIA does not require monitoring of surface water quality during the construction phase. 41. As groundwater exists over than 16 m deeper, therefore, the EIA did not require monitoring of ground water quality during construction phase as well. 42. Drinking Water: Drinking water is supplied from Talimarjan Reservoir located approximately 8km south of the TPP with maximum storage capacity with 1525 million m3. 11,000m3/day is abstracted from the reservoir’s outlet canal, of this 5600m3/day is treated for drinking water which supplies both the plant and the residences in Nuriston. The remainder is used as feed water to the desalination plant and for cooling the desalination evaporators.

43. The quality of drinking water is measured monthly by TPP Lab in accordance with EIA/EMP requirements. Samples are taken from Water Treatment Plant inlet and outlet. Monthly measurement data for January-September 2017 period are given in Annex 2. According to data received the obtained results did not exceed UZB State National Standards and the drinking water supplied from the water treatment plant at «Talimarjan TES» in village Nuristan is suitable for use as per state standards O’zDst-950-2011. Kashkadarya State Environmental Institute accepts their measurements and permits for the supply.

44. Record of water consumption: Both the EIA and local environmental regulations require the monitoring of water consumption. Contractor installed the water meters in the previous reporting period. The Contractor also completed the executive normative documents and maintained the records for monitoring water usage from September 2016 and continued till March 2017. Utility Consumption monitoring data for non-potable and potable water is presented in Annex 3.

2.3 Wastewater treatment

45. Both the EIA and local environmental regulations required monitoring of wastewater discharges. The Contractor obtained environmental permits and normative documents for wastewater discharge monitoring (ПOД-13) and normative documents started to be filled in and the records have been kept during the previous period. The contractor monitored



14

both domestic wastewater and industrial waste water quantity and quality. Sewage is generated from both TPP site and the residential areas of Nuriston. A sewage treatment plant was constructed to treat all the sewage from the power station and Nuriston. The outflow from the sewage treatment works also discharges to the collection pond that receives treated water from the neutralization plant. The outflow from the collection pond, discharges into a drain known as collector drain K-3-2. Collector drain K-3-2 runs for 14km before discharging into the Kizilkum desert. Monthly monitoring of the inflows and outflows for the Talimarjan sewage treatment plant as well as monthly chemical analyses of wastewater from Karshi Main Canal (KMK) conducted by TPP Lab for January-September 2017 period are given in Annex 4.

46. Karshi Main Canal (KMK): Water quality of the KMK is measured regularly (monthly) by TPP Lab at the water intake and discharge outlet of TPP 1 during construction and the operation periods.

Within the framework of the project, water use of KMK is performed mostly for the cooling of the equipment. Water quality analyzes are made before and after discharging wastewater into KMK. From the results of the analysis given in Annex 4, most parameters are within national standards with the exception of sulphate and BOD which are both slightly elevated above the standards in both cases - at the water intake and discharge outlet of the KMK. From the results of measurement data, it can be noted that sulphate and BOD parameters even slightly reduced after the use of water for cooling purposes. Due to the above, high content of sulphate and BOD is not related to the project, it is the water baseline data in the channel.

2.4 Air quality

47. The EIA does not require monitoring of air emissions during the construction phase, but the EIA requires monitoring of dust levels in the surrounding areas to adjust or increase the frequency or intensity of control measures accordingly during construction phase. Therefore, EPC Contractor was requested to take necessary measures and actions to monitor dust levels in the surrounding areas during the construction phase.

48. During commissioning of gas turbines the Continuous Air Monitoring System installed onto the main stack and NOx, CO has been monitored since October 2016. The Continuous Emission Measurement System data has been obtained from the EPC contractor during the operation period. The Air Emission and Dust Control data sheet of HRSG#2 and HRSG#3 Main Stack and Bypass Stack is given in Annex 5. The average values are in the environmental limits.

49. Ambient air measurements were performed near the settlements Nuriston and Mekhnatabad in November 2017, according to measurement data given in Annex 6 b, no exceeding on recommended parameters (CO, SO2) were observed in the given period except NO2 which was slightly increased near the settlement Nuriston. 50. Visual observations of the ambient environmental condition of the project area were done during the site visits in reporting period - most number of construction sites were watered.

2.5 Waste management:

51. According to the EIA requirements, prior to the start of construction, the contractor was required to develop an inventory of waste fractions expected to be generated during construction for the approval of disposal routes and sites by the local authorities. Continuation of waste management monitoring during the commissioning and operational phases was also a requirement of the EIA.



15

52. During the reporting period progress was observed related to the preparation of waste logs, which are kept at contractor’s office for different waste types and classes. Data of waste log book were reflected in CC’s monthly reports as of January-March 2017 and attached to the report as an Annex 7.

53. A contract was signed with local licensed company “Nuriston Tozalash” for hand-over and disposal of hazardous and construction waste. Luminescent lamps are disposed separately at special containers and removed from site periodically by licensed company. But waste management at TPP landfill area as well as at construction site still needs improvement.

54. During the post-construction environmental audit conducted by PMU and TPP environmental specialists in November 2017 most part of construction waste and scrap metal were removed from the site, but some construction waste in the temporary facilities area (opposite to Unit 2-demolished toilet) and within the area of the concrete batching plant, as well as hazardous waste (luminescent lamps) have been still observed. Contractor took responsibility to clean up the mentioned areas within a week period and provide photographic evidence of the completed activities. It was agreed with the contractor to handover the waste to a licensed company and to submit the transfer note to Uzbekenergo PIU.

54.In December 2017 EPC Contractor cleaned up the site surrounding area from construction waste and handover hazardous waste to designated company. Photos of site surrounding area after cleaning and removal of construction waste as well as transfer note for handover of hazardous waste to designated company is attached as Annex 8.

2.6 Borrow pit:

55. A 3-ha borrow site is 4 km away from the construction site. It was owned by a private company which had a service contract with HDEC to supply soil. At present, the borrow site has been decided to be used as garbage dumping area by the Nuristan Municipality. A new company (“Nuriston Tozalash”) has been awarded to operate the garbage dumping area.

56. In December 2017, as per ADB Mission request TPP administration provided a copy of the Resolution of the Khokim of Nishan District on the allocation of a land plot of 33.1 hectares in the territory of the Nishon SSG for the disposal and storage of waste to the district enterprise “Nuriston Tozalash Khususiy Corhonasi” and also Conclusion of State Environmental Expertise related to the development of a sanitary landfill within the territory of Borrow Pit (See Annex 9 and Annex 10).

2.7 Flora and fauna monitoring

57.Despite the region generally being a source of habitat to a significant number of native and introduced species, including some of conservation significance, the CCGT and TPP sites are highly modified, having been cleared of vegetation, and having a habitat unlikely to support any flora or fauna species of environmental significance. No impacts that would adversely affect these areas are likely to result from the construction of the new CCGT units, therefore, the EIA did not require flora and fauna monitoring during construction phase.

2.8 Accident and incidents:

58. The EIA requires monitoring and keeping reports of accident and incidents. During this reporting period there were no accidents and incidents reported by the contractor.



16

PART III ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

3.1 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (EMS), SITE SPECIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL

MANAGEMENT PLAN, AND WORK PLAN

59. The contractor established an operational system for managing environmental impacts and carries out the monitoring and mitigation measures set out in the Site Specific Environmental Management Plan. The contractor submitted to the PMU monthly environmental reports on the implementation of such measures.

60. The contractor prepared site specific environmental management plan (SSEMP) at the beginning of the project. The Site Specific EMP was revised by the Contractor, was reviewed and commented by the CS-MM and reviewed and approved by the PMU on 6 August 2014. On 7th December, 2016 Site Specific EMP was revised/updates and issued for approval to PMU. The status of environmental plans prepared by the contractor according to the requirements of EIA is given in Table 4.

Table 4. Status of Environmental Management Plans

Management Plan Status

Site Based Environmental Management Plan Submitted, approved on 06.08.2014. The revised one is submitted and approved by the PMU on 07.12.2016.

Environmental monitoring program Submitted as an annex to the site specific environmental management plan, approved on 06.08.2014

HS Plan Submitted,

Dust control plan It is included in Site Based EMP as a section 5.4.

Noise control plan Contractor uses “Noise Control Plan” of section 5.5 on “Site Based Environmental Management Plan” and HTS-SCS-ANJU-EH-01 Noise”.

Wastewater control plan It is included in section 5.6 of Site Based EMP

Waste management plan Submitted as a part of SB EMP Sec 5.8

Pollutants spillage control plan Submitted as a part of SB EMP Sec 5.

MSDS contents of hazardous materials MSDS are kept in HDEC HSE dept. It is open to PMU and CSMM since August 2016.

Traffic management plan It is submitted as Rev. 2. By the EPC contractor.

Emergency preparedness and response plan Emergency Preparedness is in SB EMP Sec.4.10. HDEC Emergency Preparedness and Response Procedure for Overseas Projects , HMS-AH-114 Rev 0/01 March 2004 and Emergency Response Procedure HMS-AJ-107, 01 April 2015 are applicable to the Project.

Site plan It is submitted as Rev.2 and also included in the Monthly Environmental Reports.



17

61. Local environmental regulations require submission of quarterly reports to the Nishon branch of Kaskadaryanski Regional Environment Committee according to terms and conditions and conclusions of the Ecological expertise review. The PMU was submitting quarterly reports to the Nishon branch of the Committee.

62. The two environmental officers from the contractor and the main subcontractor continued to work together on implementing the site-based EMP and improving the environmental conditions. The revised site-based EMP from 30 November 2016 has been used for this review.

63. Substantial progress has been made by the contractor in addressing environmental issues raised during the previous reporting period. Key issues on site addressed partially or in full during this reporting period are: drainage, water metering, waste management, wastewater discharges, handling of hazardous materials such as bitumen, storage and disposal of hazardous wastes, vehicle washing area, and environmental monitoring and monthly reporting from the contractor, as well as compliance with the local environmental regulations.

64. Monitoring of the compliance with site-based EMP for January-March 2017 was carried out on the site by PMU/CS-MM, and CSMM submitted the monthly environmental reports to the PMU. The contractor submitted monthly environmental reports for the same months and CSMM reviewed and commented them and then PMU submitted these commands to the EPC Contractor.

3.2 Site inspections and audits

65. During the reporting period, the site monitoring was conducted on a monthly basis by TPP’s environmental expert, and audit of compliance with the Environmental Management Plan and site monitoring were carried out on a monthly basis by CS-MM and Environmental Reports were prepared and submitted to the PMU.

66. In November 2017, the ADB conducted CSR Mission auditing the PMU/CSMM and the EPC Contractor’s performance and implementation of the Site Specific Environmental Management Plan.

67. During the reporting period, PMU Environmental Specialist, TPP environmental specialist and CS-MM Environmental Specialist conducted the following site visits, the list of all review missions conducted by PMU and SC are described in the Table 7 below:

Table 7: List of review missions conducted by PMU and SC (CS-MM)

Date of Review Mission

Conducted by

January 2017 TPP Environmental Specialist, CS-MM Environmental Specialist

February 2017 TPP Environmental Specialist, CS-MM Environmental Specialist

March 2017 PMU manager, CSMM

May 2017 TPP Environmental Specialist, CSMM

June 2017 PMU Environmental Specialist, CSMM

July 2017 PMU manager, TPP Environmental Specialist, CSMM



18

August 2017 PMU manager, CSMM,

September 2017 CSMM, TPP Environmental Specialist

October 2017 TPP Environmental Specialist

November 2017 PMU Environmental Specialist and TPP Environmental Specialist conducted Post-Construction Environmental Audit

3.3 Non-compliance Notıces

68. During this reporting period, two non-compliance reports were issued by CS-MM, in particular: 1. NCR-HSE-046 - regarding the unfenced chemical storage area and missing spill response kits; and 2. NCR-HSE-052 - is on the Acid/Passivation Liquids temporary pond utilized during acid cleaning of steam pipes. The summary and statuses of new and previous NCRs are as follows:

� No waste log is kept for all type of wastes produced at the project site. Keeping a waste log is required by both the local environmental regulations and site based EMP, which is a high ranking risk. Status: Progress was observed related to the preparation of waste logs, which are kept at contractor’s office for different waste types and classes. Data of waste log book are reflected in CC’s monthly reports and attached to the report as an Annex 7. NCR has been closed.

� No waste separation to the domestic, metal scrap, used oil, paper, hazardous, etc., as well as no separate waste disposal area designated at the project site. Both local environmental regulations and site based EMP require waste separation and designation of separate waste disposal area in the project site, which was a high ranking risk. Status: These are started to be segregated. In fact, almost all of the waste are commercially valuable scraps and always segregated before removing from the site. All type of waste were delivered to the TPP. The EPC contractor together with TPP team started separation of different kind of construction waste at TPP landfill during this reporting period. NCR has not been closed.

� No spill response kits were present at the project site, which is a medium ranking risk. Status: The EPC Contractor placed some spill response kits to the site. Since the construction is almost finished, the spillage risk is really low. NCR has been closed.

� The practice of burning of waste, wood, etc., on site, which was a low ranking risk. Status: This is very rare at the site since September 2016.

� Bitumen was not handled in accordance with provisions of SSEMP/EMP as well as the local environmental requirements, which is a medium ranking risk. Status: Since the construction and bitumen use almost finished, it turned out to be a lower risk. NCR has been closed.

� Wastewater and residue from cleaning of concrete-mixing equipment are discharged on the ground, which is a low ranking risk. Status: Almost all concrete use is completed and hence, it is now a low risk. CC was requested to clean up the area where the concrete residue is disposed including concrete batching plant. NCR was closed in December 2017.

� Hazardous waste were not stored separately in accordance with the provisions of SSEMP/EMP and local environmental regulations, which is a medium ranking risk.



19

Status: Contractor handover hazardous waste to designated company and transfer note is exist at camp site. NCR has been closed.

� The watering to control dust was not sufficient due to the summer conditions, which is a low ranking risk. Status: During the construction period (Jan-March 2017) the EPC contractor started to water the dusty roads. By end of March 2017, all the roads in the Power Block area have been completed and the risk of dust is very low. NCR has been closed.

� The surplus excavated soils were not removed in a timely fashion from the construction site causing dust pollution due to summer conditions, which was a low ranking risk in the previous reporting period. Status: Almost all of the surplus excavated soils were removed from the site and piled near the Cooling Tower area to be utilized for grading and reinstatement.

� During the operation of Unit 2 and Unit 3 gas turbines, Contractor claimed that the Methane concentration is too high whereas Ethane concentration is too low compared to the contractual gas supply data. This may lead to excess NOx emissions since the turbines were not trimmed for this gas concentration. This may also affect the net power output and net heat rate. Status: In November 2017, during operation, when the capacity was reached, excess of NOx emissions was not observed (See Annex 6a). Methane is the pure gas with low calorific heat of combustion and only because of this, the more volume of gas is burned.

� The contractual guaranteed level for NOx has been exceeded in the recent two months during the operation. The max level is 25 ppmvd (15% O2 Dry) whereas the measured maximum is 40 ppmvd (14.37% O2 dry). These could be because of inefficient burning or simply of calibration of the instruments. Status: HDEC has been requested to explain the reason and take the remedial actions to lower the values to the guaranteed one.

� During the construction period of TPP 1 roads have been damaged and are under rehabilitation. 60-70% of roads have been already repaired by CC during the reporting period, rehabilitation of remaining part has been completed in November 2017. Completion photos of rehabilitation works on remaining parts of access road are attached in Annex 8.

3.4 Corrective action plans

69. The contractor has started to take actions to rectify the NCRs and substantial progress has been made to address environmental concerns raised previously, during this reporting period.

70. The status of corrective actions taken are given in Table 8.

Table 8. Status of corrective actions taken to reflect the action plan of the previous report

N Description on non-compliance Corrective Action Required (CAR) including deadline

Performance Date/Resolution Status of CAR

1. Local environmental permits for all temporary facilities- obtaining local environmental permits for all temporary facilities by the Contractor are still pending.

Local environmental permits for all temporary facilities should be obtained from local authorities by end of March 2016.

Statutory monitoring measurements requested by the permits should be

Main progress during this reporting period was that the contractor completed obtaining conclusions of ecological expertise/environmental permits for all temporary facilities including the borrow pit. The



20

Statutory monitoring measurements requested by the permits are not conducted by the contractor yet.

conducted regularly by the contractor starting from April 2016.

measures required/mentioned in the environmental permits have been executed by the Contractor and the normative documents provided/listed in the environmental permits of the temporary facilities were filled in/executed by the contractor.

2. Poor environmental management at borrow site - Borrow site near the Project site is becoming a dumpsite. No record of all soil taken from the borrow pit and returned to the pit.

The Contractor should improve environmental management at borrow pit. After completion of the operations in its certain section, the idle material should be backfilled, compacted, terraced and harmonized with the landscape by end of March 2016.

The contractor should keep record of all soil taken from the borrow pit and returned to the pit and the data should be included in monthly environmental reports of the contractor.

The borrow pit is not fully re-instated and is filling with garbage from the local community. According to TPP management, the borrow site has been converted into community landfill and owned by private company “Nuriston Tozalash”. The ADB Mission requested TPP administration to provide a copy of the agreement from the local authority with conditions that the borrow site or the whole community landfill site will be developed as a sanitary landfill. Deadline for submission of the agreement is the end of December 2017.

3. Drinking water - drinking water for workers is not filtered in construction site to provide clean potable water supply to workers.

Filter should be installed to provide clean potable water supply to workers at construction site by end of March 2016.

It is understood that the incoming water is already treated in TPP Water Treatment Plant. The supply pipe has been flashed and no sediment comes. Hence No need for any additional filtering. CLOSED.

4. Concrete Batching Plant - site-poor waste management was fixed within the territory of the plant: Cement sludge is seen everywhere, scrap metal and concrete slabs were scattered in an uncontrolled manner. The Mission requested Contractor to clean the site and remove all waste from the site till the end of December 2017.

The Contractor should improve environmental management at the batching plant site and batching plant should be cleaned up, all waste removed and surface gravelled by end of March 2017.

Gravelled and concrete pavement done partially. However it is not sufficient. Metal scrap and concrete slabs are again scattered in an uncontrolled manner and need to be removed. Deadline is end of December 2017.

Not completed.

5. Monitoring measurement data for wastewater - normative documents for wastewater discharge monitoring (ПOД-13) are not kept by the Contractor as requested by local environmental permits for temporary facilities.

Normative documents for wastewater discharge monitoring (ПOД-13) should be kept regularly starting April 2016.

Completed. CLOSED.

6. Water usage records - normative documents for water usage monitoring (ПOД-11) are not kept by the Contractor as requested by local environmental permits for temporary facilities.

normative documents for water usage monitoring (ПOД-11) should be kept regulalry as requested by local environmental permits starting April 2016.

Completed. CLOSED.

7. Hazardous waste management - The contractor has not executed the contract with the licensed organization on the

The contractor should execute the contract with the licensed organization

Partially completed. Hazardous waste (in particular luminescent lamps) are still at the site,



21

hand-over and disposal of hazardous waste.

on the hand-over and disposal of hazardous waste by end of March 2017.

contractor will handover them to a licensed company and will submit the transfer note to Uzbekenergo PIU with deadline - 10th of December 2017.

8. Access roads rehabilitation - Road and rail access to the site for construction equipment, construction materials and power station equipment already exist and were used for the original TPP Unit 1 construction. During the construction period of TPP 1 roads have been damaged and are under rehabilitation.

The contractor is required to maintain the access roads in a suitable condition and ensure that any underlying services are not damaged.

60-70% of roads have been already repaired by CC, but remaining part is still under rehabilitation with deadline in Q1 2018. Completed activities with photos and handover memo to be reflected in Annual EMR 2018.



22

3.5 Consultation and complaints

71. Grievances redress mechanism is in place at the project site. The logbook is available for logging of complaints at the TPP’s entrance gate. A contact phone number and a contact email address were publicly made available at public consultation events and at the TPP entrance. Complaints have been reviewed by the TPP Environmental Management Team as part of each audit. There are no complaints received and logged on the logbook during the construction phase of the project by the stakeholders and local residents as of 30 October 2017.

3.6 Recommendations and Action Plan during Operation

72. Action Plan for corrective measures during the next operation period is provided in Table 9.

Table 9. Action Plan for the Next Operation Period

# Activities/Corrective Actions to be implemented

Deadline

1. Conduct monitoring of environmental quality with particular reference to noise, air emissions, wastewater, ambient air quality, etc.

Monthly, 6-monthly.

By TPP Lab.

2. Monitoring of waste management. During whole operation period.

3. Access roads rehabilitation To be reflected in Annual EMR due in March 2018.

4. TPP administration to provide a copy of the agreement from the local authority with conditions that the borrow site or the whole community landfill site will be developed as a sanitary landfill.

Deadline for submission of the agreement is 5th of December 2017.

5. Preparation and submission of Annual EMR March 2018.



23

ANNEXES

ANNEX 1. NOISE MONITORING DATA EXTRACTED FROM THE HDEC MONTHLY ENVİRONMENTAL REPORT OF JANUARY-MARCH 2017



24

Annex 1 - Noise Level-Jan-Mar-2017.p

Annex 1-Noise-Measuremen



25

Annex 2: Quality of Potable Water

Information about the results of analysis of the drinking water samples taken from the testing point of water purification – 28 January, 2017

Tra

nsp

are

ncy

, cm

Resi

du

al

free

ch

lori

ne,

mg/l

Alk

alin

e r

ea

ctio

n,

Mg

.eq

v/l

Chlo

rid

es,

mg

/l

Perm

ang

an

ate

o

xida

tion

mg

O2/l

To

tal h

ard

ne

ss

Colo

r,

Gra

d.

Te

mpera

ture

, С

To

tal i

ron

volu

me

Adm

ixtu

res

PH

fa

ctor

Ta

int

Odor

Norm

ind

ica

tor

for

drin

king w

ate

r

Sam

ple

po

ints

20-30

0,2-0,5

- 250 5,0 7-9 20 - 0,3 - 6-9 2 2 Within the norm for drinking water

O’zDst-950-2011

25 - 0-2,3 175 3,4 7,4 12 7 0,34 8 8,0 2 2 Water treatment plant -

inlet

35 0,32 0/2,2 163 3,0 7,0 10 9 0,3 6 7,5 2 2 Water treatment plant -

Outlet,

After the reservoir



26

The drinking water supplied from the water treatment plant at «Talimarjan TES» in village Nuristan is suitable for use as per state standards O’zDst-950-2011.

Shift manager: Akhmedov B.

State Control Department: A.T. Davronov



27

«Talimarjan TES» Shop hydraulic facilities and sewerage

Information about the results of analysis of the drinking water samples taken from the testing point of water purification – 28 February, 2017

Tra

nsp

are

ncy

, cm

Re

sidu

al

fre

e

chlo

rine

, m

g/l

Alk

alin

e r

ea

ctio

n,

Mg.e

qv/

l

Ch

lori

de

s, m

g/l

Perm

an

ganate

oxi

datio

n

mgO

2/l

Tota

l hard

ne

ss

Co

lor,

Gra

d.

Tem

pe

ratu

re,

С

Tota

l iro

n v

olu

me

Adm

ixtu

res

PH

fa

ctor

Tain

t

Odo

r

No

rm ind

icato

r fo

r dri

nki

ng

wate

r

Sam

ple

po

ints

20-30

0,2-0,5


O’zDst-950-2011

25 - 0-2,3 172 3,2 7,4 12,5 10 0,34 8 8,2 2 2 Water treatment plant -

inlet


Outlet,

After the reservoir



28


Information about the results of analysis of the drinking water samples taken from the testing point of water purification – 28 March, 2017

Tra

nsp

are

nc

y, c

m

Re

sidu

al f

ree

ch

lori

ne

, mg/l

Alk

alin

e

react

ion

,

Mg.e

qv/

l

Ch

lori

de

s,

mg/l

Perm

an

gana

te o

xida

tion

mgO

2/l

Tota

l ha

rdn

ess

Co

lor,

Gra

d.

Tem

pe

ratu

re, С

Tota

l iron

vo

lum

e

Adm

ixtu

res

PH

fa

ctor

Tain

t

Odo

r

No

rm

ind

icato

r fo

r dri

nki

ng

w

ate

r

Sam

ple

po

ints

20-30

0,2-0,5


O’zDst-950-2011


inlet


Outlet,

After the reservoir



29


Information about the results of analysis of the drinking water samples taken from the testing point of water purification – 28 April, 2017

Tra

nsp

are

ncy

, cm

R

esi

du

al

fre

e

chlo

rin

e, m

g/l

Alk

alin

e

rea

ctio

n,

Chlo

rid

es,

Pe

rma

ngan

at

e

oxi

dati

Tota

l hard

ne

ss

Colo

r,

Gra

d.

Tem

pe

ratu

re,

Tota

l iron

volu

m

Ad

mix

ture

s

PH

fa

ctor

Tain

t

Odor

Norm

in

dic

at

or

for

drin

kin

g

wate

r

Sa

mp

le

poin

ts

20-30 0,2-0,5 - 250 5,0 7-9 20 - 0,3 - 6-9 2 2 Within the norm for drinking water

O’zDst-950-2011


inlet


Outlet,

After the reservoir



30

«Talimandzharskaya TES» Shop hydraulic facilities and sewerage

Information about the results of the chemical analysis of drinking water samples taken from the testing point of water purification - 31 May 2017

Tra

nsp

are

ncy

, cm

Resi

du

al

free

ch

lori

ne,

mg/l

Alk

alin

e r

ea

ctio

n,

Mg

.eq

v/l

Chlo

ride

s, m

g/l

Perm

ang

an

ate

oxi

da

tion

mg

O2/l

To

tal h

ard

ne

ss

Colo

r,

Gra

d.

Te

mpera

ture

, С

To

tal i

ron

volu

me

Adm

ixtu

res

PH

fa

ctor

Ta

int

Odor

Norm

ind

ica

tor

for

drin

king w

ate

r

Sam

ple

po

ints


O’zDst-950-2011

25 - 0-2,3 155 3,6 7,4 12 14 0,35 8 8,3 2 2 Water treatment plant - inlet

40 0,33 0/2,2 125 3,1 7,1 10 17 0,22 6 7,6 2 2 Water treatment plant – outlet,

After the reservoir



31

«Talimandzharskaya TPP» Shop hydraulic facilities and sewerage

Information about the results of the chemical analysis of drinking water samples taken from the testing point of water purification – 28June2017

Tra

nsp

are

ncy

, cm

Resi

du

al

free

ch

lori

ne,

mg/l

Alk

alin

e r

ea

ctio

n,

Mg.e

qv/

l

Chlo

ride

s, m

g/l

Pe

rma

ng

anate

oxi

datio

n

mgO

2/l

Tota

l ha

rdne

ss

Colo

r,

Gra

d.

Tem

pera

ture

, С

Tota

l iro

n v

olu

me

Ad

mix

ture

s

PH

fa

cto

r

Tain

t

Odor

Norm

ind

icato

r fo

r drin

king w

ate

r

Sa

mp

le p

oin

ts

20-30

0,2-0,5


O’zDst-950-2011

25 - 0-2,3 150 3,7 7,5 12 15 0,36 8 8,3 2 2 Water treatment plant - inlet


After the reservoir



32

Information about the results of analysis of the drinking water samples taken from the testing point of water purification – 28 July 2017

Tra

nsp

are

ncy

, cm

Resi

du

al

free

ch

lori

ne,

mg/l

Alk

alin

e r

ea

ctio

n,

Mg

.eq

v/l

Chlo

ride

s, m

g/l

Perm

ang

an

ate

oxi

da

tion

mg

O2/l

To

tal h

ard

ne

ss

Colo

r,

Gra

d.

Te

mpera

ture

, С

To

tal i

ron

volu

me

Adm

ixtu

res

PH

fa

ctor

Ta

int

Odor

Norm

ind

ica

tor

for

drin

king w

ate

r

Sam

ple

po

ints

20-30

0,2-0,5


O’zDst-950-2011

30 - 0/2,3 157 3,4 7,7 12 17 0,39 8 8,2 2 2 Water treatment plant - inlet


After the reservoir



33

Information about the results of the chemical analysis of drinking water samples taken from the testing point of water purification -28 August 2017

Tra

nsp

are

ncy

, cm

Re

sidu

al

fre

e

chlo

rine

, m

g/l

Alk

alin

e r

ea

ctio

n,

Mg.e

qv/

l

Ch

lori

de

s, m

g/l

Perm

an

ganate

oxi

datio

n

mgO

2/l

Tota

l hard

ne

ss

Co

lor,

Gra

d.

Tem

pe

ratu

re,

С

Tota

l iro

n v

olu

me

Adm

ixtu

res

PH

fa

ctor

Tain

t

Odo

r

No

rm ind

icato

r fo

r dri

nki

ng

wate

r

Sam

ple

po

ints


O’zDst-950-2011

25 - 0/2,3 151 3,4 7,8 12 18 0,38 8 8,2 2 2 Water treatment plant - inlet


After the reservoir



34

«Talimandzharskaya TES» Shop hydraulic facilities and sewerage

Information about the results of the chemical analysis of drinking water samples taken from the testing point of water purification – 29 September 201

Information about the results of the chemical analysis of drinking water samples taken from the testing point of water purification -28 Jule 2017



35 T

ransp

are

ncy

, cm

Resi

du

al

free

ch

lori

ne,

mg/l

Alk

alin

e r

ea

ctio

n,

Mg.e

qv/

l

Chlo

ride

s, m

g/l

Pe

rma

ng

anate

oxi

datio

n

mgO

2/l

Tota

l ha

rdne

ss

Colo

r,

Gra

d.

Tem

pera

ture

, С

Tota

l iro

n v

olu

me

Ad

mix

ture

s

PH

fa

cto

r

Tain

t

Odor

Norm

ind

icato

r fo

r drin

king w

ate

r

Sa

mp

le p

oin

ts


O’zDst-950-2011

25 - 0/2,3 154 3,5 7,7 12 17 0,37 8 8,1 2 2 Water treatment works inlet

40 0,38 0/2,2 127 3,2 7,5 10 19 0,26 6 7,5 2 2 Water treatment works outlet

After the reservoir



36

Annex 3: Utility Consumption monitoring data extracted from the HDEC Monthly Environmental Report of March (Final) 2017



37

ANNEX 4: Chemical analyses of wastewater from Karshi Main Canal (KMK) and wastewater treatment plant (January-September 2017)

Wastewater Chemical Analysis for January 2017 (Eco-Analytical Laboratory of Chemistry workshop at "Talimarjan TPP")

Source of sampling: water taken from the Karshi Main Canal (KMK) for cooling and discharged back to the KMK

№ Parameters Unit Water outlet №2 MPC

(Maximum Permissible

Concentration)

Karshi Main Canal (KMK)-Intake

Karshi Main Canal (KMK) – Discharge outlet

1 Mineralization мg/l 833,2 831,4 1000,0

2 Suspended substances

мg/l 155,8 155,0 151,11

3 Sulphates мg/l 215 205 228,8

4 Chlorides мg/l 168 165 300,0

5 Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD-5)

мg/l 3,5 3,4 3,59

6 Ammonium мg/l 0,5 0,48 0,54

7 Nitrite ions мg/l 0,05 0,048 0,052

8 Nitrate ions мg/l 1,15 1,0 9,1

9 Iron мg/l 0,3 0,30 0,3

10 Petroleum products мg/l 0,02 0,02 0,05

11 Copper мg/l 0,01 0,012 0,01



38

Source of sampling: Sewage treatment plant

№ Name of ingredients

Unit water outlet #1

MPC (Maximum Permissible

Concentration)

STP Inflow STP Outflow Collector

К-3-2

1 Mineralization мg/l 1138 1136 1136 1348


мg/l 34,0 33,8 33,6 30,0

3 Sulphates мg/l 215 210 210 500

4 Chlorides мg/l 185 183 186 350


мg/l 3,5 3,3 3,4 3,0-6,0

6 Ammonium мg/l 0,5 0,5 0,5 2,0

7 Nitrite of ions мg/l 1,1 1,06 1,0 25,0

8 Ion Nitrate мg/l 0,05 0,05 0,05 0,5

9 Iron мg/l 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,5

10 Petroleum products мg/l 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,3

11 Copper мg/l 0,01 0,01 0,01 1,0

12 PH * 8,5 7,6 8,2 6,5-8,5

12 pH * 8,7 8,2 7,0

13 Temperature C 21 25



39

Wastewater Chemical Analysis for February 2017

(Eco-Analytical Laboratory of Chemistry workshop at "Talimarjan TPP") Source of sampling: water taken from the Karshi Main Canal (KMK) for cooling and discharged back to the KMK.



Concentration)



1 Mineralization мg/l 1020 1012 1000,0


мg/l 184,6 176,2 151,11

3 Sulphates мg/l 272 281,0 228,8

4 Chlorides мg/l 150,0 140,0 300,0


мg/l 3,8 4,2 3,59

6 Ammonium мg/l 0,05 0,06 0,54

7 Nitrite ions мg/l 0,04 0,08 0,052


9 Iron мg/l 0,3 0,2 0,3


11 Copper мg/l 0,018 0,017 0,01

12 pH * 8,5 8,4 7,0




40





Concentration)


К-3-2



мg/l 33,2 32,7 33,5 30,0

3 Sulphates мg/l 235 220 221 500

4 Chlorides мg/l 200 180 175 350


мg/l 3,4 3,2 3,4 3,0-6,0

6 Ammonium мg/l 0,7 0,5 0,4 2,0


8 Ion Nitrate мg/l 0,05 0,03 0,03 0,5

9 Iron мg/l 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,5

10 Petroleum products

мg/l 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,3

11 Copper мg/l 0,016 0,015 0,016 1,0

12 PH * 8,5 7,6 8,2 6,5-8,5



41

Wastewater Chemical Analysis for March 2017 (Eco-Analytical Laboratory of Chemistry workshop at "Talimarjan TPP")




Concentration)





мg/l 187,2 175,5 151,11




мg/l 3,5 3,2 3,59

6 Ammonium мg/l 0,07 0,05 0,54



9 Iron мg/l 0,3 1,0 0,3


11 Copper мg/l 0,02 0,01 0,01

12 pH * 7,9 8,2 7,0




42





Concentration)


К-3-2



мg/l 33,6 33,2 32,5 30,0

3 Sulphates мg/l 230 225 223 500

4 Chlorides мg/l 190 180 185 350


мg/l 3,5 3,2 4,0 3,0-6,0

6 Ammonium мg/l 0,9 0,6 0,6 2,0


8 Ion Nitrate мg/l 0,06 0,05 0,07 0,5

9 Iron мg/l 0,4 0,3 0,2 0,5


мg/l 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,3

11 Copper мg/l 0,03 0,02 0,02 1,0

12 PH * 7,9 8,1 7,5 6,5-8,5



43

Wastewater Chemical Analysis for April 2017 (Eco-Analytical Laboratory of Chemistry workshop at "Talimarjan TPP")



Unit Water outlet №2 MPC


Concentration)





мg/l 184,0 182,3 151,11




мg/l 3,5 3,3 3,59

6 Ammonium мg/l 0,06 0,05 0,54



9 Iron мg/l 0,3 0,2 0,3


11 Copper мg/l 0,02 0,01 0,01

12 pH * 8,3 8,2 7,0




44



Unit Water outlet #1


Concentration)


К-3-2



мg/l 33,4 33,3 33,5 30,0

3 Sulphates мg/l 233 231 235 500

4 Chlorides мg/l 180 182 185 350


мg/l 3,5 3,3 3,4 3,0-6,0

6 Ammonium мg/l 0,8 0,6 0,7 2,0

7 Nitrite of ions мg/l 1,0 1,0 1.0 25,0

8 Ion Nitrate мg/l 0,05 0,04 0,05 0,5

9 Iron мg/l 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,5


мg/l 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,3

11 Copper мg/l 0,03 0,02 0,02 1,0

12 PH * 8,5 7,3 8,5 6,5-8,5



45

Wastewater Chemical Analysis for May 2017

(Eco-Analytical Laboratory of Chemistry workshop at "Talimarjan TPP")

Source of sampling: water taken from the Karshi Main Canal (KMK) for cooling and dischargd back to the KMK.


Unit Water outlet №2 Water outlet №2





мg/l 170,3 168,2 151,11


4 Chlorides мg/l 160 150 300


мg/l 3,7 3,5 3,59

6 Ammonium мg/l 0,05 0,04 0,54

7 Nitrite of ions мg/l 0,05 0,04 0,052

8 Ion Nitrate мg/l 0,6 0,5 9,1

9 Iron мg/l 0,26 0,20 0,3


11 Copper мg/l 0,03 0,02 0,01

12 pH * 8,4 8,2 7,0




46

Source of sampling: wastewater treatment plants




Concentration)


К-3-2



мg/l 34,8 34,1 33,5 30,0

3 Sulphates мg/l 237 232 231 500

4 Chlorides мg/l 185 180 175 350


мg/l 3,6 3,4 3,5 3,0-6,0

6 Ammonium мg/l 0,7 0,6 0,5 2,0


8 Ion Nitrate мg/l 0,05 0,04 0,05 0,5

9 Iron мg/l 0,4 0,6 0,5 0,5


мg/l 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,3

11 Copper мg/l 0,02 0,01 0,02 1,0

12 PH * 8,4 7,3 8,4 6,5-8,5



47

Wastewater Chemical Analysis for June 2017


Source of sampling: water taken from the Karshi Main Canal (KMK) for cooling, the discharge is discharged back to the KMK







мg/l 170,3 168,2 151,11




мg/l 3,7 3,5 3,59

6 Ammonium мg/l 0,05 0,04 0,54



9 Iron мg/l 0,26 0,20 0,3


11 Copper мg/l 0,03 0,02 0,01

12 pH * 8,4 8,2 7,0




48

Source of sampling: wastewater treatment plants




Concentration)


К-3-2



мg/l 34,8 34,1 33,5 30,0

3 Sulphates мg/l 237 232 231 500

4 Chlorides мg/l 185 180 175 350


мg/l 3,6 3,4 3,5 3,0-6,0

6 Ammonium мg/l 0,7 0,6 0,5 2,0


8 Ion Nitrate мg/l 0,05 0,04 0,05 0,5

9 Iron мg/l 0,4 0,6 0,5 0,5


мg/l 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,3

11 Copper мg/l 0,02 0,01 0,02 1,0

12 PH * 8,4 7,3 8,4 6,5-8,5



49

Wastewater Chemical Analysis for July 2017


Source of sampling: water taken from the Karshi Main Canal (KMK) for cooling, the discharge is discharged back to the KMK







мg/l 173,2 165,1 151,11




мg/l 3,6 3,5 3,59

6 Ammonium мg/l 0,05 0,04 0,54



9 Iron мg/l 0,33 0,30 0,3


11 Copper мg/l 0,03 0,02 0,01

12 pH * 8,6 8,5 7,0




50





Concentration)


К-3-2



мg/l 35,3 34,1 34,9 30,0

3 Sulphates мg/l 234 232 230 500

4 Chlorides мg/l 183 180 170 350


мg/l 3,6 3,4 3,5 3,0-6,0

6 Ammonium мg/l 0,6 0,4 0,4 2,0


8 Ion Nitrate мg/l 0,05 0,04 0,06 0,5

9 Iron мg/l 0,3 0,2 0,36 0,5


мg/l 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,3

11 Copper мg/l 0,02 0,02 0,03 1,0

12 PH * 8,5 7,5 8,6 6,5-8,5



51

Wastewater Chemical Analysis for August 2017






Concentration)





мg/l 176,3 173,1 151,11




мg/l 3,6 3,4 3,59

6 Ammonium мg/l 0,05 0,03 0,54


8 Ion Nitrate мg/l 0,7 0,5 0,

9 Iron мg/l 0,3 0,27 0,27


11 Copper мg/l 0,03 0,02 0,02

12 pH * 8,6 8,5 8,5

13 Temperature C 21 24 24



52





Concentration)


К-3-2



мg/l 35,8 35,1 34,6 30,0

3 Sulphates мg/l 236 233 228 500

4 Chlorides мg/l 175 170 168 350


мg/l 3,5 3,3 3,6 3,0-6,0

6 Ammonium мg/l 0,7 0,5 0,5 2,0


8 Ion Nitrate мg/l 0,07 0,04 0,05 0,5

9 Iron мg/l 0,4 0,2 0,3 0,5


мg/l 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,3

11 Copper мg/l 0,04 0,03 0,04 1,0

12 PH * 8,6 7,4 8,6 6,5-8,5



53

Wastewater Chemical Analysis for September 2017






Concentration)





мg/l 178,4 174,2 151,11




мg/l 3,5 3,3 3,59

6 Ammonium мg/l 0,04 0,03 0,54



9 Iron мg/l 0,3 0,2 0,3


11 Copper мg/l 0,03 0,02 0,01

12 pH * 8,5 8,4 6,5-8,5




54

Source of sampling: Swage treatment plant




Concentration)


К-3-2



мg/l 34,6 34,2 33,8 30,0

3 Sulphates мg/l 233 230 226 500

4 Chlorides мg/l 172 170 167 350


мg/l 3,4 3,2 3,5 3,0-6,0

6 Ammonium мg/l 0,6 0,5 0,5 2,0


8 Ion Nitrate мg/l 0,06 0,04 0,05 0,5

9 Iron мg/l 0,3 0,2 0,3 0,5


мg/l 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,3

11 Copper мg/l 0,04 0,03 0,04 1,0



55

Annex 5: The Air Emission and Dust Control data sheet of HRSG#2 and HRSG#3 Main Stack and Bypass Stack from

HDEC Monthly Environmental Report of March 2017



56



57

Annex 6 a: TPP Laboratory, Air Emissions – December, 2017

Annex 6 b: Ambient Air Monitoring Data – November 2017

Ambient-Air-Measurement-Data-Nov-201

№ Device Name of ingredients

Тtemperature Measurement result

MPC (Maximum Permissible Concentration)

4 Units №2 and 3 Nitrogen Oxide NO

88/87 3,9/4,0 4,355

Nitrogen (II) oxides NO2

24,3/21,4 26,8

Carbon monoxide CO

0,2/0,3 12,5

Sulfur Oxide SO2

0,0



58

Annex 7: Waste Monitoring data extracted from the HDEC Monthly Environmental

Report of March 2017



59

ANNEX 8. Site Photos

Site-Photos-Nov-2017.pdf

Access-Roads-Rehabilitaion-Photos-Nov


60

Annex 9 - Resolution of the Khokim

Resolution of the Khokim of Nishan District on the allocation of a land plot of 33.1 hectares in the territory of the Nishon SSG for the disposal and

storage of waste to the district enterprise “Nuriston Tozalash Khususiy Corhonasi”

Герб Республики Узбекистан

Решение хокима Нишанского района

«2» июня 2014 года № Х-776/6 г. Янги Нишон

О выделении районному предприятию «Нуристон тозалаш хусусий корхонаси» земельного участка площадью 33,1 гектара на территории ССГ «Нишон» для хранения и уничтожения отходов

В целях выполнения решения постоянной комиссии по рассмотрению вопросов предоставления (реализации) земельных участков при хокимияте района о выборе земельного участка общей площадью 33,1 гектара из контуров 399, 407к, 406к, 297к, 396а на территории ССГ «Нишон», для выделения районному предприятию «Нуристон тозалаш хусусий корхонаси» для хранения и уничтожения отходов, и на основании Земельного Кодекса Республики Узбекистан и статьи 6 Закона «О местной государственной власти»

РЕШИЛ:

1. Утвердить акт постоянной комиссии по рассмотрению вопросов предоставления (реализации) земельных участков при хокимияте района о выборе земельного участка общей площадью 33,1 гектара из контуров 399, 407к, 406к, 297к, 396а на территории ССГ «Нишон», для выделения районному предприятию «Нуристон тозалаш хусусий корхонаси» для хранения и уничтожения отходов (акт прилагается).

2. Выделить в постоянное пользование районному предприятию «Нуристон тозалаш хусусий корхонаси» для хранения и уничтожения отходов земельный участок общей площадью 33,1 гектара из контуров 399, 407к, 406к, 297к, 396а на территории ССГ «Нишон».

3. Проектную документацию по земельному участку, выбранному для выделения в постоянное пользование районному предприятию «Нуристон тозалаш хусусий корхонаси», согласовать с ответственными органами в установленном порядке на основании требований нормативных документов.

4. Обеспечение и контроль исполнения настоящего решения возложить на первого заместителя хокима района И.Зиннаева.

Хоким района М.Хайитмуродов

Гербовая печать хокимията района


61

Annex 10- CONCLUSION OF STATE ENVIRONMENTAL EXPERTISE

Герб Республики Узбекистан

Государственный комитет Республики Узбекистан по охране природы

Кашкадарьинский областной комитет по охране природы

«03». 06. 2014 года № 1599/02 г. Карши

ЗАКЛЮЧЕНИЕ

ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОЙ ЭКОЛОГИЧЕСКОЙ ЭКСПЕРТИЗЫ

Объект: Проект заявления о влиянии на окружающую среду строительства «Места хранения и уничтожения отходов» на территории схода сельских граждан «Нишон» Нишанского района - первый этап оценки влияния на окружающую среду

Заказчик: «Нуристон тозалаш хусусий корхонаси»

Проектировщик: научно-производственная фирма «EKONIKA»

Руководителю «Нуристон тозалаш хусусий корхонаси» Г.Алиеву

Копия: начальнику управления архитектуры и строительства Нишанского района К.Кодирову

Начальнику Нишанской районной инспекции по охране природы А.Махматкулову

Материалы Проекта заявления о влиянии на окружающую среду строительства «Места хранения и уничтожения отходов» на территории схода сельских граждан «Нишон» Нишанского района - первый этап оценки влияния на окружающую среду представлены на государственную экологическую экспертизу руководителем «Нуристон тозалаш хусусий корхонаси» Г.Алиевым.

Объект по степени влияния на окружающую среду относится к виду деятельности с низкой опасностью, цель его заключается в создании на земельном участке свалки отходов.


62

До проектирования на данном земельном участке была земля, занятая заброшенным грунтовым карьером.

Земельный участок, выбранный и выделяемый для строительства «Места хранения и уничтожения отходов», расположен на двух участках контуров 399, 407к, 406к, 297к, 396а карты землепользования сельскохозяйственных земель на территории схода сельских граждан «Нишон» Нишанского района, и состоит из грунтового карьера общей площадью 33,1 гектара.

Первый участок расположен на контурах 399 и 396а, и ограничен с севера железной дорогой длиной 400,0 метров, с востока – луговыми землями длиной 780,0 метров, с юга – асфальтированной дорогой длиной 300,0 метров, и с запада – луговыми землями длиной 600,0 метров, земельный участок составляет 24,0 гектара.

Второй участок расположен на контурах 407к, 406к и 297к, и ограничен с севера открытым карьером длиной 200, метров, с востока – открытым карьером и луговыми землями длиной 650,0 метров, с юга – луговыми землями длиной 80,0 метров, и с запада – луговыми землями длиной 650,0 метров, земельный участок составляет 9,1 гектара.

Пропущена страница

Если образующиеся бытовые хозяйственные сточные воды будут решены местным способом, образующиеся от отходов сточные воды будут повторно использоваться.

Загрязнение атмосферного воздуха – в ходе деятельности свалки возникновение неприятного запаха, возможно его возникновение под влиянием используемой техники.

Захоронение отходов в целях его предупреждения осуществляется с полным соблюдением технологических процессов, путем сохранения санитарно-охранной зоны шириной не менее 500 метров. На расстоянии не менее 1,0 км не имеется населенных пунктов.

В ходе реализации данного технологического процесса будут использоваться природные ресурсы и выбрасываться в окружающую среду выделения, выбросы и отход, оказывая определенное вредное влияние на нее.

Отходы по своему составу будут состоять из: упаковки от доставленных товаров, кусков металла, бумаги, дерева, досок, тряпок, полиэтилена и пластмассы, резины, остатков овощей и плодов, продовольственных отходов и мусора от уборки.


63

В результате антропогенной деятельности за 1 год образуется 1,079 тонн бытовых твердых отходов, от м2 твердого покрытия 21 кг, от м2 зеленой зоны 35 кг отходов, и 10-15 перегоревших осветительных ламп.

Для защиты земельных источников осуществляются меры рекультивации. По фасадной части со стороны дороги внутренняя часть подъездных путей будет благоустроена, посажены декоративные деревья и будет создана озеленительная зона.

Чрезвычайные ситуации на свалке могут возникнуть в результате не соблюдения нормативных требований при хранении жидких отходов (сточных вод), образовавшихся от отходов, могут возникнуть при землетрясении более 9,0 баллов, будет наблюдаться загрязнение надземных и подземных вод. Для их предупреждения будут проводиться геологические и гидрогеологические работы.

Заказчику и проектировщику по охране окружающей среды рекомендуется:

- выделить в установленном порядке земельный участок, использовать в предусмотренных целях, и переоформление в соответствующем порядке при изменении порядка использования;

- ведение геологических и гидрогеологических работ, осуществление гидроизоляции с учетом их результатов, с учетом показателя почвенного просачивания, глубины залегания подпочвенных вод;

- сохранение защитной зоны железных дорог, проходящих около свалки, и согласование местонахождения свалки с железнодорожным предприятием;

- не размещение на свалке токсичных производственно-промышленных отходов;

- сохранение согласно нормативам дистанций между существующими вокруг и предусмотренными строительством подземными и надземными инженерными коммуникациями и сооружениями;

- внедрение на объекте новых передовых технологий, уменьшающих вредное воздействие на окружающую среду, и оборудование их современным оборудованием.

Государственная экологическая экспертиза одобряет проект заявления о влиянии на окружающую среду строительства «Места хранения и уничтожения отходов» на территории схода сельских граждан «Нишон» Нишанского района предприятия «Нуристон тозалаш хусусий корхонаси» и рекомендует реализовать его, а также признала необходимым разработать протокол экологических последствии.

Контроль за выполнением условий заключения возлагается на начальника Нишанской районной инспекции по охране природы А.Махматкулова.

Заключение государственной экологической экспертизы имеет юридическую силу в течение трех лет с даты выдачи.


64

Председатель областного комитета по охране природы,

начальник государственной экологической экспертизы подпись М.Х.Маманазаров

Исполнитель: подпись Ш.Турсунов

Гербовая печать


65

ANNEX 11 – Post-Construction Environmental Audit Report with Post-Construction Environmental Audit Checklist

Environmental Monitoring Report · system (G-PAD-M-70-018) and the commissioning procedures for the cooling tower, since it is indicated that the dependence of the outdoor air temperature

Documents

Environmental Monitoring Report · system (G-PAD-M-70-018) and the commissioning procedures for the cooling tower, since it is indicated that the dependence of the outdoor air temperature