YOU ARE DOWNLOADING DOCUMENT

Please tick the box to continue:

Transcript
Page 1: Corneal graft survival and intraocular pressure control after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with pre-existing glaucoma.

Corneal graft survival and intraocular pressure control after Descemet stripping automated

endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with pre-existing glaucoma

Desmond QUEK1, Tina WONG1,2, Donald TAN1,2, Jodhbir MEHTA1,2,3

1Singapore National Eye Centre and Singapore Eye Research Institute2Department of Ophthalmology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore

3Clinical Sciences, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School

The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this e-poster

Singapore Eye Research InstituteSingapore National Eye Centre

Page 2: Corneal graft survival and intraocular pressure control after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with pre-existing glaucoma.

Background• DSAEK now the procedure of choice for endothelial

dysfunction1-3

• Reports on effect of DSAEK on IOP control and graft failure in eyes with pre-existing glaucoma limited– Incidence of post-DSAEK IOP elevation 45%4

– Graft failure rates higher in eyes with prior glaucoma filtration surgery or tube shunts5

• Aim– To describe the effect of DSAEK on IOP control and corneal graft

survival in Asian eyes with pre-existing glaucoma or ocular hypertension

1. Koenig SB, Covert DJ. Early results of small-incision Descemet stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 2007;114(2):221-6.2. Price MO, Price FW. Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2007;18(4):290-4.3. Bahar I, Kaiserman I, McAllum P, Slomovic A, Rootman D. Comparison of posterior lamellar keratoplasty techniques to penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 2008;115(9):1525-33.4. Vajaranant TS, Price MO, Price FW, Gao W, Wilensky JT, Edward DP. Visual acuity and intraocular pressure after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with and without preexisting glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2009;116(9):1644-50.5. Letko E, Price DA, Lindoso EM, Price MO, Price FW, Jr. Secondary Graft Failure and Repeat Endothelial Keratoplasty after Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 2010 Sep 22 [Epub ahead of print].

Page 3: Corneal graft survival and intraocular pressure control after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with pre-existing glaucoma.

Methods• Retrospective case series• Inclusion criteria

– Consecutive eyes with pre-existing glaucoma or OHT undergoing DSAEK

– Minimum follow-up duration of 12 months• DSAEK

– By 5 surgeons– Standard surgical technique– Donor graft inserted via taco-folded or Sheets glide insertion

technique– Post-op prednisolone forte 1% q3H gradual taper

• Main outcome measures– Graft failures– Additional IOP lowering treatment post DSAEK

Page 4: Corneal graft survival and intraocular pressure control after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with pre-existing glaucoma.

Variables examined• Demographics• Duration of f/u• DSAEK indications• Glaucoma diagnoses• Duration of glaucoma• Pre-DSAEK

– VA– IOP– Glaucoma treatment

• Additional intra-op procedures– Phacoemulsification– Synechiolysis– ACIOL exchange– Vitrectomy

• Post-DSAEK– VA– Mean post-op IOP– Change in mean IOP– IOP range

Page 5: Corneal graft survival and intraocular pressure control after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with pre-existing glaucoma.

Pre-DSAEK visual acuity6/60 or worse6/12 or better

321

68.12.1

Pre-DSAEK IOP (mmHg) 13.9 ± 4.3

Additional intraoperative procedures 16 34.0

Indications for DSAEKPBK with PCIOLPBK with ACIOLBK post LPIPBK with previous LPIFailed PKFuchs endothelial dystrophyPosterior polymorphous dystrophyBK post glaucoma filtration surgery

11411311511

23.48.523.46.423.410.62.12.1

Results Value %

Number of eyes, patients 47, 46

Age at DSAEK (mean ± SD) 66.6 ± 9.4

Gender (male), Race (Chinese) 24, 41 51.1, 87.2

Duration of follow-up, months 27.3 ± 8.5

Page 6: Corneal graft survival and intraocular pressure control after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with pre-existing glaucoma.

Results Value %

Pre-existing glaucoma diagnosesAcute primary angle closurePrimary angle closurePrimary angle closure suspectPrimary angle closure glaucomaPrimary open angle glaucomaSecondary angle closure glaucomaSecondary open angle glaucomaOcular hypertensionAngle closureSecondary glaucoma

2457361822424

4.38.510.614.96.412.838.34.351.151.1

Duration of glaucoma diagnosis (months) 75.4 ± 69.3

IOP lowering interventions pre-DSAEKLPI pre-DSAEKOn at least 1 topical IOP medicationNo. of topical IOP medications Glaucoma filtration surgery pre-DSAEK

TrabeculectomyTrabeculectomy with 5-FUTrabeculectomy with MMCGlaucoma drainage deviceTrabeculectomy + GDD

17280.94 ± 0.9614

51611

36.259.6

29.8

Page 7: Corneal graft survival and intraocular pressure control after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with pre-existing glaucoma.

Results Value %

Post DSAEK visual acuityChange in VA (Snellen lines)Improvement ≥ 2 Snellen linesImprovement < 2 Snellen linesDeprovement ≥ 2 Snellen linesVA of 6/12 or better at last follow-upCompared to pre DSAEK

5.4 ± 3.73611024

76.623.4051.1p<0.001

Post DSAEK VA and IOP

Post DSAEK IOP indicesPost DSAEK mean IOP (mmHg)Lowest post DSAEK IOP (mmHg)Highest post DSAEK IOP (mmHg)Range of post-DSAEK IOP (mmHg)Change in IOP (mmHg)

16.0 ± 2.59.2 ± 2.627.4 ± 8.918.2 ± 9.62.1 ± 4.1 p=0.006

Page 8: Corneal graft survival and intraocular pressure control after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with pre-existing glaucoma.

Graft failuresResults Value %

Number of DSAEK graft failuresNumber of repeat DSAEKNumber of second DSAEK graft failures

Interval to graft failure (months)

831

12.8 ± 7.0

1737.533.3

Graft failure reasonsEndothelial rejectionSubsequent intra-ocular proceduresRepositioning of IOLTrabeculectomy complicated by gross hyphaemaCentral graft-host dislocationCytomegalovirus endothelitis

42

11

Control groupNo. of eyes undergoing DSAEK in the same time

frame, by same surgeons, without pre-existing glaucoma

No. of graft failuresCompared to eyes with glaucoma

137

11 8p=0.08

Page 9: Corneal graft survival and intraocular pressure control after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with pre-existing glaucoma.

Kaplan-Meier curve for graft survival

KM estimated probability of graft survival at1 year = 100%2 years = 94.2%

Risk factors for graft failure•None identified

Page 10: Corneal graft survival and intraocular pressure control after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with pre-existing glaucoma.

IOP treatment post DSAEKResults Value %

On at least 1 topical medication post DSAEKCompared to pre DSAEK

Requiring fewer topical medications post DSAEKRequiring additional IOP lowering treatment

Requiring additional topical medication(s) onlyRequiring glaucoma filtration surgery onlyRequiring additional medication(s) and surgery

Interval from DSAEK and glaucoma surgery (months)No. of topical medications post DSAEKNo. of additional topical medications post DSAEK

36

329

2126

9.3 ± 6.92.0 ± 1.51.1 ± 1.4

74.5p=0.056.461.7

72.46.920.7

p<0.001

Risk factors for need for additional IOP lowering treatment•No pre DSAEK glaucoma filtration surgery

– Odds ratio = 10.8, p = 0.002 (univariate)

•Additional intra-operative procedures during DSAEK– Odds ratio = 18.2, p = 0.008 (univariate)– Odds ratio = 12.2, p = 0.033 (multivariate)

Page 11: Corneal graft survival and intraocular pressure control after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with pre-existing glaucoma.

Discussion• Eyes that had undergone glaucoma surgery pre-DSAEK were less likely to require additional

IOP lowering treatment post-DSAEK– Suggests that pre-DSAEK glaucoma filtration surgery is able to adequately control post-DSAEK IOP

elevations in majority of eyes

• Eyes that underwent additional intraoperative procedures during DSAEK were more likely to require additional IOP-lowering therapy post-DSAEK– Additional procedures presumably incited additional post-operative inflammation, or caused further

direct damage to the trabecular meshwork, leading to post-DSAEK IOP rise

• Monitoring of glaucoma progression remains a challenge in eyes with corneal decompensation secondary to endothelial dysfunction– Perimetry results pre-DSAEK are seldom reliable nor accurate– Optic disc is often not clearly visualized– Angle assessment hindered by peripheral corneal opacification– In our study, mean highest IOPs of 27.4 ± 8.9 and a wide range of IOP fluctuation of 18.2 ± 9.6 mm

Hg were observed post-DSAEK– However, the mean rise in IOP post-DSAEK was modest, with an overall mean increase of 2 mm Hg– Prompt and efficient lowering of raised IOP post-DSAEK could explain for the overall low rise in IOP– Efforts should be made to reduce raised IOP in post-DSAEK glaucomatous eyes, to prevent

progression of glaucomatous optic nerve damage

Page 12: Corneal graft survival and intraocular pressure control after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with pre-existing glaucoma.

LIMITATIONS

•Retrospective •Small sample size•Lack of control group•Non-standardization of glaucoma treatment protocols•Further prospective randomized controlled studies will be required to better elucidate

– True effect on intraocular pressure control– Glaucoma progression

CONCLUSIONS

•With prompt and appropriate intervention, IOP in glaucomatous eyes undergoing DSAEK can be controlled with minimal increase post-DSAEK•Glaucomatous eyes without prior filtration surgery and eyes that underwent additional intraoperative procedures during DSAEK are more likely to require additional IOP-lowering therapy•These eyes should be carefully monitored, and IOP-lowering therapy promptly instituted to prevent possible progression of glaucoma


Related Documents