CONCEPTUAL PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLANenvironmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/FormB/EC/EIA_EMP/... · Project: Manglam Tarang CP & EMP Promoted by: Manglam Build Developers

Project: Manglam Tarang CP & EMP

Promoted by: Manglam Build Developers Ltd.

Enkay Enviro Services Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur

CONCEPTUAL PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

INTRODUCTION:

PROJECT DETAILS:

The proposed project involves construction of group housing project “Manglam Tarang” on a

plot measuring as 11,572.93 sq. m. and will gain a built-up area of 46,801.63 sq. m. The

project will have three towers, B+S+12 floors each with 480 flats of 2 BHK, Club (1,481.83 sq.

m.) Swimming Pool etc.

LOCATION OF PROJECT

The project site is located at Khasra No. 1774/1, 1775/1 & 242, Village Muhana, Tehsil

Sanganer, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. The geographical coordinates of the project site are

26°47'55.15"N, 75°44'09.95"E. Google map of 500 m. radius showing surrounding features is

enclosed as Annexure- V

BUILT UP AREA DETAILS:

Sr. No. Blocks (A & B) Gross Built up Area (sq. m.)

FAR (sq. m.)

1. Basement Floor 4289.97 0

2. Stilt Floor 3323.90 316.21

3. 1st Floor 3258.74 2649.85

4. 2nd Floor 3239.84 2705.95

5. 3rd Floor 3239.84 2705.95

6. 4th Floor 3239.84 2705.95

7. 5th Floor 3239.84 2705.95

8. 6th Floor 3239.84 2705.95

9. 7th Floor 3239.84 2705.95

10. 8th Floor 3239.84 2705.95

11. 9th Floor 3239.84 2705.95

12. 10th Floor 3239.84 2705.95

13. 11th Floor 3239.84 2705.95

14. 12th Floor 3239.84 2705.95

15. Terrace Floor 290.78 0




Total 46801.63 32731.51

PARKING REQUIREMENT:

1. Residential:

FAR area: 28,231.42 sq. m.

1 ECU per 75 sq. m. of FAR area

= 376.42 ECU

2. Commercial

FAR area: 291 sq. m.

1 ECU per 50 sq. m. of FAR area

= 5.82 ECU

3. Visitors

25% Visitors Parking

= 95.56 ECU

Total ECU required: 477 ECU

Total ECU provided: 481 ECU

Details of parking are provided in Form 1 under section 1.17.

POWER REQUIREMENT:

Connected load : 3705 KW

Maximum Demand : 2059 KW

Load Details:

Sl. No.

Type of Flat

Total no. of each type

Total BUA per Flat (sq.

ft)

Connected Load per sq. ft. as

per RSEB norms (KW)

Assessed Connected Load per Unit (KW)

Assessed Connected

load per Flat (KW)

Total Connected Load (KW)

for each type

Unit

Residential & Commercial Load

S + 12 Blocks




3

A, B, C type (2BHK)

480 836 0.008 6.688 7 3360

4 Shops 14 1893 0.008 15.144 0.025 47

Total Connected Load for Residential & Commercial Units (in KW) 3407 KW

Common Load

Qnty KW/ Blk

1 Passenger Lifts

12 8 96

2 Parking/ Lobby/ Stair Lights

35

3 Water Pump Sets 32

4 Guard Room, Area Lights, Fountains, Signage etc.(KW) 35

5 Club, Community Hall etc 35

6 Street Lighting

5

7 Landscape Area

10

8 S.T.Plant 50

Total Connected Load for Common (in KW)

298

Total Connected Load

3705 KW

Considering a Div.Factor of 0.5 the Maxm. Power Demand (in KW) is likely to be 1853 KW

Maximum Demand in KVA Unit (Assuming P.F. of 0.9)

2059 KVA

Maximum Power Demand in the Colony in KVA Unit, say,

2059 KVA

Selection of Transformers:

Total load requirement : 3705 KW

Applying power factor of 0.9 : 2059 kVA

Load requirement

Considering 80% loading of rated transformer capacity,

Minimum rating of transformer required : 2422 kVA

Hence, 1500 kVA – 1 nos., 1000 kVA – 1 nos., 33/ 0.433 kV transformers will be used.

Selection of DG sets :

Total load requirement : 298 KW




Applying power factor of 0.8 : 261 kVA

Considering 80% loading of rated DG capacity

Minimum rating of Genset required : 326 kVA

Hence, 1 nos. 380 kVA DG set may be selected.

Back Up Source :

There will be power backup through DG set of capacity of 380 kVA used in case of power cut or

failure. DG set will be provided with a effective safe stack height of 48.00 m. The fuel

requirement is tabulated as under:

S.No. Capacity of DG set Fuel Fuel consumption

1. 380 kVA HSD 64 l/hr /DG

CRITERIA OF WATER DEMAND:

The daily water requirement for the proposed development will be 246 KLD (fresh water demand:

170 KLD and the recycled water demand: 76 KLD). Criteria for water demand is given as:

S.

No.

Particulars Population

(nos.)

Fresh

Water

Basis

(lpcd)

Fresh

Water

Demand

(L)

Water

Basis

(lpcd)

Treated

Wastewater

Demand

(L)

Total

water

demand

(KLD)

1. Residents 2400 65 156000 21 50400 206.4

KLD

2. Club & Shops 442 21 9282 9 3978 13.2 KLD

3. Staff 50 30 1,500 15 750 2.2 KLD

4. Visitors 360 9 3240 6 2160 5.4 KLD

Total (a) 3,252 170022 57288 227.5

KLD

Say

227 KLD

5. Landscaping

Softscape

Hardscape

1205.5 sq.m.

500.8 sq.m.

704.7 sq.m.

10 ltr.@ per sq.m.

05 ltr.@ per sq.m.

5008

3523.5

8.5 KLD

6. General

Washing

4670.89 sq.m. 0.5 ltr.@ per sq.m. 2335.4 2.5 KLD

7. Filter Backwash @ 30 cu.m. / hr. for 15 min 7.5 KLD

Total (b) 10866.9 18.5 KLD

Grand Total (a+b) 3252 170022 246 KLD




WATER BALANCE

Fresh

water

169.9 KLD

Say

170 KLD

Recycled /

Reuse

treated

water

76.0 KLD

199.3 KLD

Waste

water Say

200 KLD

S

T

P

Capacity

250 KLD

Sludge &

evaporation

losses

(10.0 KLD)

Daily water demand : 170 KLD + 76 KLD = 246 KLD

1.2 KLD

Residential

(156.0 KLD)

124.8 KLD

Staff ( 1.5 KLD)

57.5 KLD in Flushing

2.0 KLD2.5 KLD in General Washing

8.5 KLD in Landscaping

57.5 KLD

Area

Surrender in

H.T. Line

Green

Corridor

(37.0 KLD)

Club & Shops

(9.2 KLD)

7.3 KLD

2.5 KLDVisitors (3.2 KLD)

Filter backwash 7.5 KLD4.0 KLD

Excessive

Treated

Water

(77.0 KLD)

IDENTIFICATION, PREDICTION AND EVALUATION OF IMPACTS:

Environmental impact can be defined as any alteration of environmental conditions, adverse or

beneficial, caused or induced by the action or set of actions under consideration.

Various operations involved in the project have been studied in details to identify, predict and

evaluate impacts on various environmental components. The identified impacts were quantified

using mathematical models to a possible extent so as to estimate the future environmental

scenario.

AIR ENVIRONMENT:

AMBIENT AIR MONITORING REPORT

Agency hired: Vison Labs; (Vendor code: EES/ ADM / LSUP/ 031/ 032)

Instrument used: Respirable Dust Sampler (SLE-RDS 103 & SLE-GA 133) & Fine Particle Sampler APM 550)

Sampling date: 08-09.09.2016, Duration: 24 hrs.




Parameter Observation Permissible

(maximum)

Analysis Method & Protocol

PM10 (µg/m3) 42.6 100 Respirable Dust Sampler method

(IS; 5182 P 23 - 2006)

PM2.5 (µg/m3) 21.0 60 RTI (Research Triangle Institute)

(Gravimetric Ana Revision- 07 Aug 14- 2003)

SO2(µg/m3) 538 80 Improved west and Geak method

(IS ; 5182 P II - 2001)

NOx (µg/m3) 13.9 80 Jacob and Hochheiser modified (Na-

Arsenite) method (IS ; 5182 P Vi - 2001)

CO (µg/m3) 650 2000 NDIR

* Monitoring reports enclosed as Annexure VI

Instrument Sensitivity:

Instrument Range and Sensitivity

Respirable Dust Sampler

(RDS)

(PM-10)

0.40 – 1.5 m3/min ±0.02 m

3/min

(Other gases)

0 – 3 LPM ± 0.2 LPM

Fine Particulate Sampler (PM – 2.5) : ±0.03 DGM m3

FREQUENCY & STABILITY CLASSES:

S.NO. Directions / Wind

Classes (m/s)

0.5 - 2.1 2.1 - 3.6 3.6 - 5.7 5.7 - 8.8 8.8 - 11.1 ≥11.1 Total

1 348.75 - 11.25 12 8 4 0 0 0 24

2 11.25 - 33.75 6 11 0 0 0 0 17

3 33.75 - 56.25 15 21 8 4 0 0 48

4 56.25 - 78.75 10 15 4 2 0 0 31

5 78.75 - 101.25 11 43 18 7 0 0 79

6 101.25 - 123.75 9 9 0 1 0 0 19

7 123.75 - 146.25 6 11 3 1 0 0 21

8 146.25 - 168.75 1 3 0 0 0 0 4

9 168.75 - 191.25 6 10 2 0 0 0 18

10 191.25 - 213.75 2 4 0 0 0 1 7

11 213.75 - 236.25 8 16 0 0 0 0 24

12 236.25 - 258.75 7 8 4 1 0 0 20

13 258.75 - 281.25 14 28 17 8 0 0 67

14 281.25 - 303.75 30 57 36 10 0 2 135

Project: Manglam Tarang


Enkay Enviro Services Pvt. Ltd.

15 303.75 - 326.25 21

16 326.25 - 348.75 3

Sub-Total 161

Calms

Missing/Incomplete

Total

CONSTRUCTION PHASE:

SOURCES:

1. Vehicular Exhaust :

The major source of pollution in construction phase will be vehicles carrying construction

material. Pollution load from the same is calculated

Pollution Load = No. of trucks

Due to movement of average 05 trucks short term pollution load is given in table:

Parameter EMISSION FACTOR

CO

NOx

SPM

SO2

HC

* Source: CPCB Publication, 1998

Manglam Build Developers Ltd.

s Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur

21 54 14 1

3 1 1 0

161 299 111 35


material. Pollution load from the same is calculated as:

Pollution Load = No. of trucks × Emission Factors × Deterioration Factor

e 05 trucks short term pollution load is given in table:

EMISSION FACTOR

(g /km)*

DETERIORATION

FACTOR (g /km)*

Pollution

Load (g/km)

4.5 1.33 29.92

1.21 1 6.05

0.8 1.595 6.38

0.15 1 0.75

1.21 1 6.05

CPCB Publication, 1998

CP & EMP

0 1 91

0 0 5

0 4 610

134

0

744


e 05 trucks short term pollution load is given in table:

Pollution

Load (g/km)

29.92

6.05

6.38

0.75

6.05




2. Emissions from Construction equipments:

The fugitive dust emission sources are:

• Excavation

• Haul road movements

• Construction

• Material Handling

• Finishing

Emissions factors for construction equipment are given in table below:

Equipment Emissions Factors (g/hr)

CO VOC NOX SOX PM10

Excavator 214.09 43.99 516.18 3.31 27.21

Backhoe/ Front end loader 190.05 56.69 370.13 1.58 37.64

Rubber tired crane 161.02 39.00 464.02 2.67 23.58

Hydraulic Crane 161.02 39.00 464.02 2.67 23.58

Concrete Vibrator 72.57 13.60 122.46 0 4.53

Paving Equipment 186.42 48.53 412.31 1.95 29.93

Roller/ Compactor 165.10 34.92 316.15 1.90 23.13

*Source: SCAQMD CEQA Hanbook

MITIGATION MEASURES:

SOURCES MANAGEMENT

Dust & emissions from vehicular

exhaust.

• Regular sprinkling of water on the haul-road.

• Speed restriction of all vehicles.

• Vehicles will be checked for PUC certification.

The dust emission sources are:

• Excavation

• Haul road movements

• Construction

• Material Handling

• Finishing

• Water spraying to prevent dust pollution from different sources

of construction.

• All transportation vehicles will be suitably covered with

tarpaulin & overloading of the vehicles will be avoided.

• Covering of the construction site on all four sides to a

considerable height to prevent dust emissions and other

pollutants to the surrounding environment.

• Ensuring vehicles stick to the access track to prevent mud and

dirt being deposited on roads.




POST CONSTRUCTION PHASE:

DG sets:

The source of emission will be from 1 D.G. set of capacity of 380 kVA, used in case of power

cuts or failure.

The details are as under:

Calculation of stack height:

The stack height of DG set is calculated as under:

H = 0.2 (√capacity of the DG set in kVA)

= 0.2 x (√380)

= 0.2 x 19.49

= 3.89 m

However, a safe stack height of 48.0 m above the building height will be provided.

S. No Capacity of DG set Fuel Fuel consumption Stack height

1. 380 kVA HSD 64 l/hr /DG 48.00 m.

Impact on Air Quality

The impact on air quality is assessed based on emissions of the proposed DG set and

vehicular emissions. NOx and CO will be the important pollutants emitting from these sources.

Prediction of impacts on air environment has been carried out employing mathematical model

based on a steady state Gaussian plume dispersion model designed for multiple point sources

for short term. In the present case, AERMOD Version 7.1.0 dispersion model for different

stability state Gaussian plume dispersion, designed for multiple point and line sources for short

term and developed by United States Environmental Protection Agency [USEPA] has been used

for simulations from point and line sources.

Model Input Data

For the modeling purpose, all pollutants as described above are considered. The details of stack

emissions and line emissions envisaged from the project are given in Table-1 (a) & (b).

TABLE-1 (a) STACK EMISSION DETAILS

S.

No.

Parameters Units DG Set (380 kVA) Stack- I

1 Stack Height m 48

2 Top diameter of flue m. 0.15




TABLE-1 (b) LINE EMISSION DETAILS

Parameter Emission rate per ECU (g/sec/m)

NO2 1.17 x 10-6

CO 1.46 x10-5

Presentation of Results

In the present case, model simulations have been carried out for the study period. The Ground

level concentrations are computed for 24-hr average. Maximum Ground level concentrations

of NO2 and CO for study period were 1.25 µg/m3 and 1.25 µg/m3 respectively. The obtained

GLC’s are well within the stipulated CPCB standards. The incremental ground level

concentrations for NO2 and CO are given in Table-2 (a).

TABLE-2 (a)

Predicted 24-Hourly Short Term Maximum Incremental Concentrations

Pollutant Maximum Incremental

Concentration (µµµµg/m3)

(X,Y)

coordinates

(m)

Towards

Direction

NO2 0.76 (200 , 100) NE

CO 0.68 (200, 100) NE

Resultant Concentrations after Implementation of the Project

The maximum incremental GLCs due to the proposed project for NO2 and CO are superimposed

on the maximum baseline concentrations recorded during the study period. The cumulative

concentrations (baseline+incremental) after implementation of the project are tabulated below in

3 Flue gas velocity m/sec 12

4 Exit Flue gas

temperature

oK 453

5 Flue gas flow rate m3/sec 0.212

6 Emission rate at stack exit

A NOx g/KWh < 9.2

B CO g/KWh < 3.5




Table-2 (b). The predicted ground level concentration isopleths for various parameters during

study period is given in Figure- 1 & 2 respectively.

TABLE-2 (b)

Details of incremental concentration of pollutants on the surroundings

Parameters Baseline Incremental

GLC’s, µg/m3

Resultant GLC’s,

µg/m3

Standard,

µg/m3

NO2 13.9 0.76 14.7 80

CO 650 0.68 651 2000

It is seen from the above table, the resultant GLC’s obtained at Project Site are well within the

CPCB standards (dated 18th November, 2009).

FIG.1 Isopleths Showing Maximum Incremental Ground Level Concentrations of NO2




FIG.2 Isopleths Showing Maximum Incremental Ground Level Concentrations of CO

MANAGEMENT PLAN

SOURCES MANAGEMENT

• Exhaust from D.G. set –

• EPA/CPCB certified DG set conforming to the standards will be

deployed.

• D.G. set will be provided with effective stack height as per the

norms of CPCB above the building height will be provided.

• Low-sulphur-content fuel (HSD - Sulphur content 0.05%) will be

used.

• Emission due to vehicular

exhausts especially

congestions during peak

traffic hours.

• Sufficient width of driveways will be provided to ensure smooth

traffic movements.

• Provisions of fully internalized parking including the parking

facilities for the visitors.

• Guided traffic ways within the project site.

• Speed humps will be installed for speed restrictions inside the

project area.




WATER ENVIRONMENT: (Ground water analysis report enclosed as Annexure VI)

S.

No.

Particulars Investigated environmental

impacts

Measures for minimizing and / or offsetting

adverse impacts identified and their

Mitigation measures

1. Details of Investigated Environmental impacts due to

i. Project

construction

Groundwater

contamination due to

domestic waste water

release from labors

camp.

Open defecation /

other allied activity.

Dust emissions due to

vehicular movement.

Impact of water

movement on and off

site and its associated

erosions,

sedimentation and

potential pollution

effects.

Septic tanks followed by soak pits to prevent

groundwater contamination.

Provide adequate number sanitation facility and

awareness to workers on the subject.

Controlled water sprinkling @ of 1.0 – 1.5 L / sq.m. .

at the interval of 1 hr is recommended (water requirement

subjected climatic / site conditions).

Soil and water management structures will be in

place prior to the commencement of construction

works, and any advance activities likely to generate

erosion and sedimentation impacts.

Silt fencing with sausage, Temporary silt fencing will

be installed at selected locations across the site.

Stockpiles will not be located in proximity to existing

or proposed drainage lines and storm water inlets.

ii. Regular

operations

Waste water leakage

Odor generation

Seepage to groundwater

Generation of large volume

of wastewater than

anticipated

Check valve, flange, at regular defined interval, and

regular maintenance of WWTP log book WWTP

Locally available active fragrance plants around

WWTP

Regular physico-chemical monitoring of groundwater.

At least 10 % higher capacity of WWTP is

recommended

Rainwater

contamination

Wastewater will be flow in closed system; hence possibility of

rainwater contamination will be minimum.

Regular cleaning of drains / associated structure

Disease vector

generation

Take necessary suitable action, like sprinkling of Bleach Powder

near WWTP site, regular monitoring for generation of vector in

WWTP water.

• Sludge

Management

Sludge pretreatment and utilization as manure

Excessive sludge may be sent to public space plantation

Excessive fresh

water usage

Use of water efficient fixtures can be consider, in place of

conventional system, will help in achieve approximately 36 % reduction in fresh water demand. Details of the same are as

represented in given below graph:




Others water usage measures

2. Unhygienic

condition, safe

drinking water

during

construction &

operation phase

One toilet facility

one hand washing

Potable water will be provided

readily accessible to all.

The employer will notify each employee of the location of the sanitation facilities

and water and will allow each employee reasonable opportunities during the

workday to use them. And also will inform the importance good hygiene practices,

communicable dis

The civil contractor will be held responsible for site sanitation and will be bound by

the management to adhere to healthy level of sanitation.

3. Assessment of significance of impacts (Criteria for

significance)

Impact source Source

Diffuse Source

Drainage Sewer networks

Roads

Plantation areas Landscape / greenbelt

Fertilizer

Pesticide / herbicide application

Drainage

Planting/ground preparation

Felling

Other diffuse sewage sludge reuse / recycling

to land

atmospheric deposition

Point

Source

Wastewater Wastewater primarily domestic

Storm water and emergency

overflow

Wastewater primarily septic tanks

Impacts scoring: 1 = minimum relevance, 5 = maximum relevance, N/A = Not Applicable, ;GW: Ground water, WR: Water reservoir (

Consumption Bathing

Liter 7 20

%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

lite

r


s Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur

Others water usage Electromagnetic Current Water meter will be installed at various

locations to monitor the water usage;

• Raw water collection points

• WWTP Inflow

• WWTP out Flow

• And others

One toilet facility (@ per 25 workers), One Urinal facility (@ per 50 workers)

one hand washing (@ per 50 workers) facility will be provided.

Potable water will be provided (@ 5 L / person) and placed in / at various locations

readily accessible to all.




communicable diseases, and retention of urine / wastewater.


the management to adhere to healthy level of sanitation.

Assessment of significance of impacts (Criteria for determining significance, Assigning

Project activity GW FL

Sewer networks 3 N/A

Roads 2 N/A

Landscape / greenbelt 2 N/A

Fertilizer application 2-4 N/A

Pesticide / herbicide application 2-4 N/A

Drainage 2 N/A

Planting/ground preparation 2 N/A

Felling - N/A

sewage sludge reuse / recycling

to land

2-4 N/A

atmospheric deposition N/A N/A

Wastewater primarily domestic 1 N/A

Storm water and emergency

overflow

1 N/A

Wastewater primarily septic tanks 3-4 N/A Impacts scoring: 1 = minimum relevance, 5 = maximum relevance, N/A = Not Applicable, ;GW: Ground water, WR: Water reservoir (

BathingFlushing (Dual

3 L & 6 L)Washing @ 7.5

LPMOther use

21 15 23

53 62

CP & EMP

Current Water meter will be installed at various

(@ per 25 workers), One Urinal facility (@ per 50 workers) and

.

and placed in / at various locations





determining significance, Assigning

WR CW

5 N/A

2 N/A

1 N/A

1-4 N/A

2-3 N/A

4 N/A

2-5 N/A

- N/A

5 N/A

- N/A

5 N/A

5 N/A

4 N/A Impacts scoring: 1 = minimum relevance, 5 = maximum relevance, N/A = Not Applicable, ;GW: Ground water, WR: Water reservoir (rain water collection pits), FL:

Total reduction (%)

36




SEWAGE TREATMENT PLAN

Around 200 KLD waste water will be generated which will be treated in STP based on FAB

technology with capacity of 250 KLD will be installed for waste water treatment. Physico

chemical characteristics of influent and effluent are given as:

SCHEMATIC LAYOUT OF STP:

Table

Environmental Monitoring Plan

(Responsibility: competent EHS / authorized person)

Flowing Water, CW: Coastal Water; Note: Degree of relevance based on known history of occurrences

Total wastewater generation from proposed activity 200 KLD

Composition of wastewater & treated water

Parameters Influent (mg/l) Effluent (mg/l)

pH 7.5 - 8.5 7 - 8

Suspended solids 275 - 325 <10 mg/l

BOD 250 - 300 <10 mg/l

COD 375 - 450 <50 mg/l

Oil & Grease 35 - 50 <5 mg/l

Coliforms (MPN / 100 ml) 105 - 10

7 50 - 500 / less

Pollution load

BOD load (kg/day) 63

COD load (kg/day) 104

BOD-COD (ratio) 0.61




S.No. WATER ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING

PROGRAM

Cost estimate*

(Rs. approx.)

i. Groundwater / Surface water / Rain water / others

S.No. Sample Collection Points S1 S 2 S 3 Freq. Rs.*

1. Ground water monitoring plan

1. Upstream (Ref. point WWTP) 6 M 2,500

2. Downstream (Ref. point WWTP) 6 M 2,500

3. Near WWTP 6 M 2,500

4. Total 7,500

2. Rain water

12. Rain water (run-off) RWH /

Collection point

Se 2,500

Se 2,500

13. Total 5,000

ii. Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP)

S.No. Sample Collection Points S1 S 2 S 3 S4 S 5 Freq. Rs.*

3. WWTP (STP - performance evaluation program)

1. Equalization tank cum collection

tank

3 M 2,500

2. Biological reactor 1 3 M 2,500

3. Biological reactor 2 3 M 2,500

4. After physico-chemical

treatment

3 M 2,500

5. Treated water tank 3 M 2,500

6. Total 12,500

4. Regular WWTP (STP regular monitoring program)

6. Equalization tank cum collection

tank

6 M 2,500

7. Treated water tank 6 M 2,500

8. Total 5,000

5. WWTP (STP -Sludge monitoring plan)

9. Sludge physico- chemical

analysis

6 M 3,000

10. Sludge leachate physico-

chemical analysis

6 M 3,000

11. Total 6,000




*EC/CTO/CTE compliance reports will be regularly submitting to State Pollution Control Board / concerned agencies, Water Cess yearly,

M: Monthly; S: Sample; Se: Seasonal ; Freq.: Frequency : Note: monitoring for all key parameters as described by CPCB

RAINWATER HARVESTING SCHEME:

CALCULATION OF PEAK DISCHARGE:

Type of

Structure/ Surface

Area

(sq. m.) [A]

Run off

Coefficient

[C]

Peak Intensity

of rainfall

[I1] (m/Hr)

Average Rainfall

[I2] (m/annum)

Peak

Discharge

Q1=CI1A

Annual

Discharge

Q2=CI2A

Roof top area 3,002.01 0.90 0.06 0.597 162.10 1612.97

Landscape Area- Soft 500.8 0.30 0.06 0.597 9.01 89.69

Landscape Area- Hard 704.7 0.75 0.06 0.597 31.71 315.52

Road/Driveway/ Paved

&Pathway/open

parking/Other Areas

8070.12 0.75 0.06 0.597 363.15 3613.39

Grand Total (1-4) 11,572.93

565.97

5,631.57 say 5,632.00

VOLUME OF RAIN WATER DRAINAGE

Total Rain Water Flow : 565.97 m3/hr

Considering 15 minutes of peak rainfall,

Runoff volume : 141.49 say 141 m3/hr

Volume of each pit : 27 m3 (3 m x 3 m x 3 m)

Total no. of rain water harvesting pits required = Total run-off volume/ volume of each pit

= 141/27

= 5.2 say 5 nos.

Providing 5 Nos. Rain Water Harvesting pit of size 3 m length x 3 m width x 3 m depth with

PVC slotted pipe upto minimum depth of 35 m as following figure.




DESIGN STRUCTURE :

Total Annual Recharge to Ground Water Regime of the area through rainwater harvesting

structure would be 5,632.00 m3

LAND ENVIRONMENT:

Soil Analysis report is enclosed as

CONSTRUCTION PHASE:

• The solid waste generated during

5,000 cu.m. will be generated, Top soil w

• The biodegradable waste generated during construction phase will be

• About 1,030 MT of the construction waste will

Management:

• The construction site will be demarked and the excavated earth will be stacked properly

for reuse.

• Due care will be taken to conserve the available top soil.

• The construction waste will be stacked properly.

• Unnecessary movement of vehicles will be avoided


s Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur


3/annum.

report is enclosed as Annexure VI.

The solid waste generated during construction phase will be excavated soil

,000 cu.m. will be generated, Top soil will be utilized within the site.

The biodegradable waste generated during construction phase will be 27 kg/day.

MT of the construction waste will be generated.

The construction site will be demarked and the excavated earth will be stacked properly

Due care will be taken to conserve the available top soil.

The construction waste will be stacked properly.

vehicles will be avoided.

CP & EMP


construction phase will be excavated soil to the tune of

kg/day.

The construction site will be demarked and the excavated earth will be stacked properly




POST CONSTRUCTION PHASE

The total waste generation in the project will be

S.

No.

Bins Particulars

1. Green

(households)

Compostable waste

Kitchen waste

Garden waste

2. Dark grey

bins

(households)

Non – biodegradable

waste + recyclable waste:

Plastics

Metal cans

Glassware

Misc.

3. Blue

(households)

Paper waste

Paper

Newspaper

Cardboards

Packing material

NOISE ENVIRONMENT:

NOISE MONITORING REPORT

Date of Moni

S. No. Location name

1. Project Site

*Noise monitoring Report is enclosed as


s Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur


eration in the project will be 960 kg/day. The details are tabularized as:

Quantity Treatment Disposal

Compostable waste 768 kg/day No in-situ treatment.

Collected and stored at

designated places.

Will be sent to

Municipal Council

sites.

biodegradable

waste + recyclable waste:

126 kg/day

104 kg/day

5 kg/day

12 kg/day

5 kg/day

No in-situ treatment.

Collected and stored at

designated places.

Will be sent to

Municipal Council

sites.

66 kg/day Efforts to recycle to the

best possible extent.

Will be collected on daily

basis.

Sent to the vendors for

recycling.

Source: Seemann, 06

NOISE MONITORING REPORT

of Monitoring: 08.09.2016to 09.09.2016

Location name Units Values

Project Site dB(A) L Day : 59.0L Night : 45.2

se monitoring Report is enclosed as Annexure VI.

CP & EMP

kg/day. The details are tabularized as:

Disposal

Will be sent to Jaipur

Municipal Council disposal

sites.

Will be sent to Jaipur

Municipal Council disposal

sites.

Sent to the vendors for

recycling.

59.0 45.2




CONSTRUCTION PHASE:

During construction phase following will be the tentative sources of noise:

Name of Source Noise level at 16 m from source

{dB (A)}

Noise level at 1 m from source

{dB (A)}

Back hoe/Loader 81 105

Dump truck 83 107

Generator Not considered 75 (as prescribed by CPCB)

To understand the combined effect of these noise levels on the nearby community, Custic

3.2 (Lakes Environmental – USEPA approved) scientific model has been used to estimate

the noise levels at different distances from the proposed project. All the major noise

generating machineries like D.G. Sets, Pumps, Trucks, vibrators, drilling machine, etc., are

considered in this model. The noise level at project boundary due to different sources is

calculated based on the following formula:

Lp2 = Lp1 – 20 log (r2 / r1) – Ae1, 2

where, Lp1 and Lp2 are sound levels at points located at distance r1 / r2 from the source

and Ae1,2 is the excess attenuation due to environmental conditions. The resultant noise

level is obtained by adding existing maximum levels to that of predicted level.

The predicted noise levels based on the above analysis at the project boundary

considering that there is no attenuation on account of barriers, will be as follows:

LOCATION MAX.EXISTING MAX. PREDICTED RESULTANT MAX

Project Site 62.5 58.1 63.8

All values are in dB(A)

From the above, it is clearly seen that there will be no significant impact on the

surrounding community due to noise from the proposed activity.

Further due to natural attenuation effects, by proper green belt development, design /

maintenance of machines, providing PPE’s to workers, etc., the impact on noise levels will be

minimal.




MANAGEMENT PLAN

SOURCES MANAGEMENT

Major sources of

noise pollution:

• Vehicular traffic

• Heavy moving

machinery

• Operation of

D.G. set, etc.

• The construction area will be shielded with sheets.

• Complete construction work especially heavy earth work will be done during

day time.

• The vehicles will be regularly maintained and optimum use of the same will

be made.

• Moving parts of the machines will be maintained properly so as to avoid

metal-to-metal impact noise.

• The D.G. set used will be eco friendly with minimum noise.

• Ear plugs will be provided to the workers.


SOURCES MANAGEMENT

• Road traffic,

• Operation of

D.G. set.

• EPA/CPCB certified DG set conforming to the standards for noise will be used.

• D.G. set will be housed in an inbuilt acoustic enclosure, which will help to

contain the noise within the permissible standards.

• The driveways will have sufficient width so that there is no congestion of

vehicles during peak hours which lead to increase in the noise levels.

• Adequate parking including provisions of visitors parking.

• Entry & exits will be manned with trained & efficient security to ensure smooth

flow of vehicles.

• There will be less starting and stopping and the vehicles will be speed restricted

to ensure the noise within the permissible limits.

• Landscape area will help to absorb noise.

RECOMMENDED LUX LEVELS:

The recommended values of illumination (in Lux) as per the National Building Code of India

(2005) are as under:

S. No. Space Illumination Level (Lux)

i. Entrance 150-200-300

ii. Lifts 50-100-150

iii. Corridor, passageways, stairs 50-100-150

iv. Covered car par

• Floor

• Ramp and Corner

• Entrance and exits

5-20

30

50-100-150




v. Outdoor car park 5 – 20

ENERGY CONSERVATION TECHNIQUES:

• Taking advantage of day lighting wherever possible to reduce the need for electric

lights.

• Total external lighting load (1.5 KW) use of Standalone Solar fixtures.

• About 8.0 KL of hot-water requirement will be met through solar hot-water generators

(32 nos.) of capacity 250 L each.

• Power factor will be maintained around unity. All capacitors will be provided with

Harmonic Filters to avoid distortion in Voltage.

• Lift load will be reduced by around 23% by the use of VF drives.

• Details of total energy savings is tabulated as under:

S. No. Particulars Actual Load (KW) Load saving (KW) Energy Saving (KWh)

1 Lighting load – Flats 1,362.8 340.7 3,407

2 Total Power load 2,044.2 204.4 2,044

3 Common Area Light

Load

298 59.6 7,15.2

TOTAL

6,166.2 (16.37%

reduction)

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN: S.

No.

Particulars Capital Cost Annual recurring

cost

1. Acoustic enclosures & stack attached to

DG sets

1 lacs 0.10 lacs

2 STP 25 lacs 2.0 lacs

3 Rain water harvesting 08 lacs 0.50 lacs

4 Solid waste management 1 lacs 0.10 lacs

5 Pollution monitoring 1 lacs 0.10 lacs

6 Fire fighting & emergency handling 20 lacs 1.0 lacs

7 Green Belt 2.0 lacs 0.50 lacs

8 Training in the area of environment &

occupational health.

0.50 lacs 0.20 lacs

TOTAL 58.5 Lacs 4.5 Lacs




ECOLOGY & BIODIVERSITY

Biotic component comprises of both plant animal communities which interact not only within

and between them self but also with abiotic i.e. physical and chemical components of the

environment. Generally a biological community is being dependent on the environmental

conditions and resources of its location may change if there are many major changes in the

environment. The number of variables like temperature, humidity, atmospheric conditions,

soil, topography, etc. is responsible for maintaining the homeostasis of the environment and a

change in any one or more of these variables may tend to destabilize the ecosystem. In such

cases the change may be mostly irreversible. Therefore, the need to assess the changes of

the animal and plant resources is primary requisite as these living things determine the

environmental healthiness of any given ecosystem or environment.

Biological impact assessment generally includes listing of plants and animals present at the

project site. The identified species are then checked for their status according to IUCN list of

threat categories viz., endemic, endangered, vulnerable, rare, indeterminate and insufficiently

known.

As part of this assignment, a flora and fauna study has been conducted for the proposed

project of Manglam Tarang at Muhana, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Field study was undertaken in the

month of September 2016. The proposed site and habitats adjacent to the site were surveyed

for flora and fauna species.

1. Objective of Study

The present work was undertaken with the following objectives:

• To collect the baseline terrestrial biodiversity status regarding flora and fauna in the

project area.

• To evaluate the dominant species of plant and animal. Secondary data also be

collected from the local residents.

• To identify the endangered / threatened / scheduled species in the study area (both

flora and fauna). The conservation plan will be given if any wildlife species of

schedule I is present there.

• To mark the ecologically sensitive areas such as national parks/ sanctuaries.

• To provide the conservation plan and given the suggestion and recommendation for

plantation and green belt.

• To assess the effect of construction and operation of the project on existing ecology.

On the basis of onsite observations a checklist of flora and fauna was prepared.




2. FLORAL STUDY

Trees

S.No Species name Binomial name

1 Neem Azadirachta indica

2 Khejri Prosopis cineraria

3 Gulmohar Delonix regia

4 Babool Acacia nilotica

Shrubs

S.No Species name Binomial name

1 Gokharu Tribulus terrestris

2 Satyanasi Argemone mexicana

3 Gajar Grass Parthenium hysterophorus

4 Peeli Doodhak Launaea nudicaulis

5 Tulsi Ocimum tenuiflorum

6 Ashwagandha Withania somnifera

Herbs and Grasses:

S.No. Species name Binomial name 1 Janagli Tulsi Ocimum tenuiflorum 2 Doob ghas Cynodon dactylon

3 Dandathor Euphorbia caducifolia

4 Vilayati babool Prosopis juliflora

5 Marigold Tagetes minuta

6 Peeli Kaner Thevetia peruviana

7 Pili Kateri Argemone mexicana 8 Gokharu Tribulus terrestris 9 Jungli chulai Amaranthus spinosus

10 Aak Calotropis procera

11 Bermuda Grass Cynodon dactylon 12 Gajar Grass Parthenium hysterophorus

4. FAUNA:

Faunal studies were also conducted during September 2016. During the survey of the study

site, no threatened/ endemic species in and around the study area were observed.




Major Features in the Study Area:

Feature Name / Status

National Park / Sanctuary Nil

Biosphere Reserve /Tiger Reserve/ Elephant

Reserve /any other Reserve

Nil

Habitat for migratory birds Nil

Corridor for animals of Schedule I & II of the

Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972

Nil

A) PIECES: No sustain water body observed at the site of study area.

B) AMPHIBIA

Particulars

S.

No.

Common name Binomial name Family Schedule

IW(P)A / IUCN

Amphibian 1 Indian skipper frog Euphlyctis cyanophlyctis Dicroglossidae LC

C) REPTILIA

Particulars

S. No.

Common name

Binomial name

Family

Schedule

IW(P)A / IUCN

Reptilian 1 Oriental Garden Lizard Calotes versicolor Agamidae LC

2 Common Rat Snake Ptyas mucosus Colubridae IV

3 Yellow-Green House

Gecko

Hemidactylus flaviviridis Agamidae LC

D) AVES OR AVIFUANA

Site specific avifaunal species observed during the site visit:

S.No. Common Name Species Name Status Schedule

Charadriidae

1. Red-wattled Lapwing Vanellus indicus B IV

Passeridae

2. House Sparrow Passer domesticus B IV

Sturnidae

3. Common Myna Acridotheres tristis B IV




E) MAMMALIA

Particulars S. No Common Name Binomial Name Family

Schedule

Mammals 1 Five stripped palm squirrel Funambulus pennantii Sciuridae IV

c. Endangered species Not observed during the study period.

d. Endemic species Not observed during the study period .

e. Migratory species Avifaunal species may be migratory.

f. Aquatic fauna NIL

5. Plantation for Green belt development:

The greenbelt development plan aims at overall improvement in the environmental conditions

of the region. Green belt planning will be done with ecological perspectives for project. Nature

of pollutants, availability of space and dominant wind directions should be considered. This

will help in reducing the concentration of pollutants and will also be effective in attenuating

noise levels.

Moreover, keeping in view the characteristics of soil, water quality and topography of the area

the following additional aspects should also be considered. Plant species should have such

characteristics:

� Fast growing and perennial species;

� Locally available species which are tolerable to soil and climate of area;

� Low water requirement and heat tolerant;

� Pest resistant species;

� Tolerance to inorganic chemicals;

6. Suggested plants

Table 1. Following listed species are suggested to develop greenbelt around the project

site:

S.No Type of Plants (Common

name)

Botanical name No. of Plants

1. Ashok Polyalthia longifolia 35

2. Neem Azadirachta indica 10




3 Gulmohar Delonix regia 12

4 Amaltas Cassia fistula 10

5 Shisham Dalbergia sissoo 08

7 Royal Palm Roystonea regia 45

Total 120

Shrub

S.No. Common Name Botanical Name

1 Bougainvillea Bougainvillea glabra

2 Chandni Tabernaemontana divaricata

3 Champa Plumeria alba

4 Thunja Thuja occidentalis

Herbs

S.No. Common Name Botanical Name

1 Rose Rosa macdub

2 Flox Phlox subulata

3 Crown Daisy Garland chrysanthemum

4 Genda Tagetes patula

5 Moss rose Portulaca grandiflora

7. Post Plantation Care

� Water in trees at least once a week, barring rain, and more frequently during hot

weather.

� Keep the soil moist but not soaked;

� Overwatering causes leaves to turn yellow or fall off.

� Other follow-up care may include minor pruning of branches damaged during the

planting process.

� Prune sparingly immediately after planting and wait to begin necessary corrective

pruning until after a full season of growth in the new location.

� Tree guard should be around the saplings until the plant reaching at mature stage.

� Fertilizers and pesticides/insecticides should be given proper time.




8. IMPACT OF PROJECT ACTIVITIES ON BIODIVERSITY

DIRECT, INDIRECT AND CUMULATIVE IMPACT ON FLORA

� Direct Impact

� Clearing of project site for construction activities – The project site is a plain land

with sparse vegetation of trees, shrub and herbs which are commonly distributed

throughout and none of rare, endangered or threatened or endemic species was

observed during survey / reported. These will be cleared during site preparation.

Therefore, the impact will be negligible and not very significant.

� Indirect Impact

� Construction activity is likely to affect the movement of the animal

� Increase in noise may affect the feeding, breeding and movement of animals.

Felling of trees may affect the avifauna.

� Likely settling of dust to be generated by movement of vehicles and other

construction activities on leaves may results in to stunted growth of vegetation and

may also affect the capacity of production.

� Large numbers of labour population will influx the area during construction phase.

� Dumping of huge quantity of excavated earth material may lead to loss of flora in the

project area

� The soil erosion due to natural and anthropogenic activities may cause major threat

to survival of vegetation.

� Cumulative Impact

� Indirect and cumulative impacts are associated with various construction activities

such as clearing of vegetation movement of vehicles, construction equipments &

machineries etc, interferences due to influx of labours etc.

� The losses of land for various project units will also not adversity affect the fauna as

similar habitat is present throughout the project immediate influenced area.

Therefore, impact due to loss of habitat for birds, reptiles and mammals of the

project area is not expected.

� Impacts on surrounding fauna due to movement of vehicles, machinery, equipments

and work force may slightly interfere in animal movements.

� Intermittent settlements any adverse impacts on wildlife are ruled out.




Mitigation measures:

1. EFFECTIVE REMOVAL OF POLLUTANTS

(1) Plants grow under conditions of adequate nutritional supply (for healthy and better growth).

(2) Absence of water stress (to maintain openness of stomatal apertures and form of

epidermal structures).

(3) Well-exposed to atmospheric conditions of light and breeze ( i.e. away from engineering

structures hindering free flow of air) to maintain free interaction with gases.

� Characters of plants including shapes of crowns considered necessary for effecting

absorption of pollutant gases and removal of dust particles are as follows:

1) Tolerance towards pollutants in question, at concentrations, that are not too high( to

be instantaneously lethal)

2) Longer duration of foliage,

3) Freely exposed foliage , through

• Adequate height of crown,

• Openness of foliage in canopy,

• Big leaves( long and broad laminar surfaces),

• Large number of stomatal apertures,

• Stomata well- exposed ( in level with the general epidermal surface)

2. REMOVAL OF SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER

1) Height and spread of crown,

2) Leaves supported on firm petioles,

3) Abundance of surfaces on bark and foliage, through

• Roughness of bark,

• Epidermal outgrowth on petioles,

• Abundance of auxiliary hairs,

• Hairs or scales on laminar surfaces,

• Stomata protected (by wax, arches/rings, hairs etc.)

The plant species should be capable of sorption of dust pollutants and barrier of noise

pollution. Combined deficiency of a variety of species will be contributed to reach the goals of

restrict the pollution.




3. MITIGATION OF IMPACT: The mitigation measures of biological impacts are aimed at (in

order of preference):

i) Avoid impact,

ii) Minimize impact,

iii) Rectify impact,

iv) Compensate for impact.

Setting aside or exclusion of critically important areas, compensatory afforestation, creation of

green belts, rehabilitation of species or individuals are basic actions taken for mitigation of

impact. While creating green belt and undertaking the afforestation works, it is required to

plant indigenous/local plants and as far as possible exotics should not be introduced. The cost

of eco-restoration of the site should be included in the project cost. This is desirable on two

counts:

i) It ensures allocation of fund for undertaking the rehabilitation of the area during and

also after the project period is over.

ii) It also acts as deterrent in selection of site for the project by bringing in the cost of

eco-restoration which can be enormous in cases where activities are proposed on a

critical ecosystems.

9. CONCLUSION

The present study is with the objective to minimize adverse environmental impacts as

discussed. The study covers all possible environmental issues involved in the project and the

necessary mitigation measures. It was observed that diversity of trees; shrub and herb were

low at site. It can be planted by the cultivation of native and local species in post construction

phase. Faunal diversity of the site was also low. Therefore, we can say that the biological

diversity of the study site not much more impacted by the present proposed infrastructure

development and the sustainable environment scenario can be retained by the proper

plantation in post construction period. Taking appropriate mitigation measures for the

sustainable environment at the site and the surrounding area is our sole responsibility.

SOCIO ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT

OBJECTIVES

The broad objectives of the socio-economic impact assessment are.

1. To study the socio-economic status of the people living in the study area.

2. To study the demographic profile of the study area.

3. To assess the impact on socio-economic environment due to the project concerned.




4. To evaluate the Socio Economic Parameter Importance Impact Unit profile

to be taken up by the Project Proponent, if any.

The studies carried out are descriptive and exploratory in nature.

The information analyzed for the project has been collected from various secondary sources

which have been supported by the site visits and field observations.

SAMPLING METHOD

The studies are conducted on a target sample; and inferences are drawn on the basis of

survey.

The proposed project is a Group Housing Project at Khasra No. 1774/1, 1775/1 & 242,

Muhana, Tehsil Sanganer, Distt. Jaipur

Habitation and Human settlement

The Habitation of the project in the 1.0 km study area is a developing area in the District,

around the habitation area in Muhana and near the Muhana Mandi Terminal market (towards

NE). The 1.0 km periphery of the proposed project site is semi urban with a mix of medium

income housing colonies of Muhana.

Population

The total population of the study area is of 7417. There are 1107 households as per the

Census of India, 2011. There are more of joint families in the study area with approx 6

members per family.

Table 0.1: Population Composition of Study Area

Name Households Population Male Females

Muhana 1107 7417 3863 3554

Sources: Census of India, 2011

Gender Distribution

Out of the total population, 52.08% are male and 47.91% are females in the study area. As

according to the above mentioned table, the gender ratio of the study area is 920. The gender

ratio of the study area is above average as compared to the district Jaipur (909).

Name Population blow 6 years Males below 6 years

Females below 6 years

Muhana 1115 598 517





The total population below 6 years is 6.6% of the study area. The proportion of girl child is

46.36% much lower than the boys 53.64% amongst the population below 6 years.

The Gender ratio for population below 6 years is 864 indicating an alarming decline in girl child

birth rate as compared to the total gender ratio in the study area.

As per the Census of India, 2011 The Child Sex Ratio for the District Jaipur is 899. As per the

NRHM bulletin, March 2012 the Child Sex ratio for the State of Rajasthan has been 883.

Literacy Profile

An average literacy rate of the study area as per census 2011 is 62.01%. The male literacy

with respect to the male population is 70.56% and the female literacy with respect to the

female population is 52.72%. The literacy gap between male & female is approx. 17.84%. In

the study area of the project the literacy is as reflected from the following table:-

Table 0.3: Literacy Profile of the Study Area

Name Total Literates Male Literates Female Literates

Muhana 4600 2726 1874


Occupation

The average work participation rate of the study area is 39.90%. The employment rate in the

1.0 Km. peripheries for main workers, marginal workers and non workers are as follows:

� The Main workers constitute 33.18% in which male worker’s participation is 23.04% with

female worker’s participation is 10.14%.

� The Marginal workers constitute 6.72% in which male workers participation is 2.24% with

female workers participation is 4.48% population.

� The Non Workers constitute 60.10%; and there is distribution of men 26.80% and women

33.30% in the non working population.

Table 0.4: Occupational Structure of the Study Area

Name of the

Village/Ward

Main Workers Marginal Workers Non Workers

Total Males Female Total Males Female Total Males Female

Muhana 2461 1709 752 498 166 332 4458 1988 2470

*Sources: Census of India, 2011




Scheduled Tribal Population:

The total Scheduled population of the study area is 0.56% (42) of the total population. The

male proportion is 57.14% and a female is 42.85%.

Scheduled Tribal

Name Total Male Female

Muhana 42 24 18

*Sources: Census of India, 2011

SOCIO ECONOMIC SURVEY OBSERVATIONS:

Habitation:

The Habitation of the project in the 1.0 km study area is a developing area in the District,

around the habitation area in Muhana and near the Muhana Mandi Terminal market 1.15 km

(towards NE). The 1.0 km periphery of the proposed project site is semi urban with a mix of

medium income housing colonies of Muhana at 780 m W. There are vacant plots and

agriculture farms around the South, South east and South west of the location in 1.0 km area.

The area is outer skirt of Jaipur City and developing urban plots with habitation, warehousing,

Truck repairing facilities.

The houses area largely Pucca. The

habitation towards the North Boundary 50

m of the project location is as shown in the

pictures given:

Social Infrastructure Available:

Particulars Distance Direction

Habitation

Muhana 0.79 km W

Kesiyawala 1.31 km SE




Mohanpura 2.31 NNE

Education

Rajkiya Adarsh uchh Madyamik Vidhyalya, Muhana 0.800 km W

Pearson school, Kalyanpura 3.82 km NE

Jaishree Periwal International School 7.62 km WNW

Hospitals

Aaganbadi , Muhana 0.800 km W

Rajkiya Ayurvedic Chikitsalya , Muhana 0.810 km W

Apex Hospital, Mansarovar 7.94 km NE

Metro Mass Hospital 8.40 km NE

Arun Dental Hospital 8.85 Km NE

Bansal Hospital 8.80 km N

Others

Albert Hall, Ramniwas Bagh (State list of protected

monument)

14.84 km NE

Muhana Mandi Terminal Market 1.15 km NE

Ring Road & Development Corridor 2.48 km W

Nearest Marketplace, Muhana Habitation Bus Stand

Rajasthan Marudhara Gramin Bank

Village Level : Water & Sanitation Works office

0.770 km W

Sheetla Mata temple 0.770 km W

Source: field survey and observations. Distance & direction are confirmed as per Google Earth.




Economy of Muhana

Muhana Mandi Terminal Market 14.84 km

nearby local work force of Muhana. The mandi market operates from sunrise to upto 11:00 am in the

morning only, but the wholesale facility given the nearby residents the opportunity to buy fresh frui

vegetables at reasonable prices than the retail grocery sellers. However this shall further benefit the

developing residential facility in the study area. Other

sources of income & employment are Dairy, provisions stores, Private jobs, local cart whee

edible items, and household farming & micro household level dying and stitching.

Status of Women & Road Safety

Asking about status of women in the local area

status is good as the women are respected in the households but only upto the extent that they follow

the social customs & traditions. No one accepts women who lead away from the household chores and

stand independent. She says she has been working part time since

after much objection from family and now earns about 6500/

Kashiram (22) says as far as women safety is concerned the locality is safe. But the traffic on Muhana

road is increasing day by day and after sunset there are various rash bus drivers leading to accidents of

local pedestrians around the settlement of Muhana.

Arvind is local tempo driver commuting between Muhana mandi terminal market and Jaipur city

regulary. He transports groceries and lives in Muhana. He says that he has no problem from the

proposed projects. Rather he will look to open a retail shop for the local society too.


s Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur

14.84 km NE provides large scale employment opportunities to the


morning only, but the wholesale facility given the nearby residents the opportunity to buy fresh frui


developing residential facility in the study area. Other

sources of income & employment are Dairy, provisions stores, Private jobs, local cart whee

edible items, and household farming & micro household level dying and stitching.

in the local area, Ragini Devi (54) a resident of Muhana replied that the

good as the women are respected in the households but only upto the extent that they follow


stand independent. She says she has been working part time since 12 years due to personal problems

after much objection from family and now earns about 6500/- through helping in households.


ay and after sunset there are various rash bus drivers leading to accidents of

local pedestrians around the settlement of Muhana.


and lives in Muhana. He says that he has no problem from the


CP & EMP

NE provides large scale employment opportunities to the


morning only, but the wholesale facility given the nearby residents the opportunity to buy fresh fruits &


sources of income & employment are Dairy, provisions stores, Private jobs, local cart wheel sellers of

, Ragini Devi (54) a resident of Muhana replied that the

good as the women are respected in the households but only upto the extent that they follow


12 years due to personal problems

through helping in households.


ay and after sunset there are various rash bus drivers leading to accidents of


and lives in Muhana. He says that he has no problem from the





On asking the Rajasthan Marudhara

Gramin Bankers in the vicinity, they

relieved that the local residents have

opened their accounts in the bank and

benefit from various schemes. The Water

& Sanitation Works office confirms of laying

the water pipeline in almost all of the

muhana plots but the sewage lines have

not yet been completely laid in the Ward. The Muhana resident largely preach

Sheetla Mata , a temple on the banks of Muhana water reservoir.

The local residents spend time in unproductive

activities during work days. The local men were

found gaming under the guise of playing cards at

various locations in and around the habitation Muhana. During the survey was asked about their income

& employment opportunities and they responded they work in early morning hours during the Muhana

Mandi terminal market opens between 5:00 am to 11: 00 am and later they get the afternoons by their

own for leisure. The group had no issues with the project proposed but look forward for skilled

development of youth in the study area.




The local schools and education system is average of Government

schools. Awareness on Girl child education is observed to be high and the

attendance of Girl Students is above average.

The EES Surveyor had a detailed understanding of the location and also inquiring about the local

problems from the residents of Muhana. The residents are indifferent towards any project activity

outside as far it does not harm them, but are more satisfid and content in their settlment as their

expectaitons are less. The girls and local women are engaged not only in household responsibilities but

also prepare Pani puris / papris and are helping the head of the family to carry out their jobs of Cart

shops of “Pani puri” and other edible items around the city.

Nearest Marketplace, Muhana Habitation Bus Stand 0.770 km W.

There are provisions stores for staple goods. The proposed project housing community shall benefit in

the sales of the provision stores and inturn get benefitted leading to a win – win situation.




bus stand. The dry toilets on the banks of the water facility were pathetic and required a regular

maintenance & flushing facility. The toilet renovation shall be taken under the social responsibility of the

project.

Table: Socio-economic snapshot of nearest habitation

Transportation was available in

all the aspects :

Roads were observed to be :

Electricity Supply has been :

Nearest dwellings :

Main Food :

Festivals :

Caste / Religion:

Wages / Income

Material Assets of the family :


s Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur

Muhana tallab is what the local people call

the water reservoir 770 m W near Muhana



snapshot of nearest habitation :

Transportation was available in The Project is in close proximity to Ring Road 2.48 km

W

Bus Govt. Roadways / Private - Tractors, Scooters,

Motor Cycles, (Public transport available).

Muhana Market Bus Stand 770 m W

Pucca, Painted & Cemented

Regular

Muhana 780 m W

Chapatti, Sabji, Dal

Holi, Diwali, Gangore, Raksha Bandhan.

The principal communities are the largely Hindus with

Agarwals, Jains, Brahmins, Yadav , Mali, Gurjar.

The Area facilitates following sources of income :

Loading & Unloading Labour:8-10 thousand per

month

Blue collar Jobs : 13-18 thousand per month

White collar Jobs : 20–75 thousand per month

Petty retail firms: Approx. 6.5-8.0 Lacs Annual Gross

Profit

A Two Wheeler / Four Wheeler; Cable Disc ; TV;

Refrigerator; semi-urban lifestyle amenities etc.

CP & EMP

is what the local people call

the water reservoir 770 m W near Muhana



The Project is in close proximity to Ring Road 2.48 km

Tractors, Scooters,

largely Hindus with

, Yadav , Mali, Gurjar.

The Area facilitates following sources of income :

10 thousand per

18 thousand per month

75 thousand per month

8.0 Lacs Annual Gross

Cable Disc ; TV;

urban lifestyle amenities etc.




Resources of potable water Government Supply (PHED)

Nature of Diseases Sun Stroke/ Cold / Cough

IMR & MMR For the State of

Rajasthan:

As per the RHS Bulletin (March 2012, M/O Health &

F.W., GOI) The Total Fertility Rate of the State is 3.1.

The Infant Mortality Rate is 47 (SRS 2013) and

Maternal Mortality Ratio is 255 (SRS 2010-12).

SOCIO ECONOMIC IMPACT

S.

no.

Situations of Socio-

economic Issues :

Impacts (reasons for variations & bias

of representative data).

Mitigation measures. In

numbers.

1 Habitation in the Buffer

Zone: The existing

habitations of study area

are urbanizing with

permanent pucca houses

of medium Income Groups

in the Muhana settlement

around the project.

The proposed project will fulfill the

housing requirements of

approximately 2400 people. It will

also lead to temporary influx of

approx. 200 workers during the

construction phase (peak) and

approx 50 people post operation.

--

EMPLOYMENT IMPACT

S.no Existing Socio-

economic Issues :

Impacts (reasons for variations & bias

of representative data).

Mitigation measures. In

numbers.

2 The existing

inhabitants in the

study area are

primarily engaged in

the trading business,

small shops or street

vending machines,

and private jobs.

Direct, (Local), employment generation.

A minimum of approx. Rs. 1.6# crore of

direct money incomes could be

generated by the local people in the

region through the construction

activities.

Direct Post Operation phase: Towards

administration staff and retail job

activity approx. 60.0# Lacs of money

income shall be earned by direct long

term stable employment.

Further, employing local

residents helps to maintain

the demographic profile of

the neighboring colonies.




3 Indirect

Employment

The Indirect employment will also be

generated through the potential

residents posing demand of helpers,

commuting taxi (for household

activities), Dairy etc.

Construction materials will be

procured locally. Thus there

is a possibility of generation

of local trading opportunities,

though temporary in the

operation phase of the

project.

#:Construction Phase & Post Operation phase

Peak Construction Phase: Proposed manpower [200] * [271 (Calculated at the minimum wage rate per

day of Highly-skilled, Raj.) = 54,200 * 300 (approx. working days) = Rs. 1,62,60,000/-

Post Operation Phase: Proposed manpower [50] * [10,000 p.m. of approximate Median Salary of staff

of commercial activity] = Rs. 60,00,000/-

GROWTH OF POSITIVE EXTERNALITIES

S.no. Socio-economic Issues: Impacts (reasons for variations & bias of representative data).

Mitigation measures. In numbers.

4 The proposed project

exists in outer-skirt city

of Jaipur. Muhana had

been a compact estate

village and is now

urbanizing into a

burgeoning town.

In the nearby locality for

example demand for

communication facilities, (for

each apartment), super markets

for convenience (staples,

impulse & emergency) goods is

estimated to increase.

Considering the proposed

region as developing urban,

hence the mixed income group

of all the apartments would

create the demand, thereby

developing positive

externalities.

GROUP HOUSING V/S INDEPENDENT HOUSES

S.no. Socio-economic Issues : Impacts (reasons for variations & bias of representative data).


5 India subsists 15% of the

world population in 2.4%

of the worlds land area.

Group housing provide

vertical structures and

fulfills housing requirement

on a single piece of land

unlike independent

Growing vertical than horizontal will not

put the burden of rising prices of land on

the society :-

Considering the same piece of land

area:

Number of apartments provided by the

proposed project = 480 flats.

Number of possible independent houses

on similar land area= Only 50 approx.

Proposed group

housing structures

aims at not putting the

burden of water and

sanitation on society

through proposed Rain

water harvesting

structures and Sewage




housing undergoing crisis

of shortage of land and

rising land prices.

(Calculated on the similar built up area

as of flats). Hence building vertical shall

be socio-economically beneficial.

treatment plants in the

project.

HEALTH & RELATED IMPACTS:

S.no. Socio-economic Issues : Impacts (reasons for variations & bias of representative data).


6 Site Security

Construction phase site specific

security shall be managed

accordingly.

Adequate security

arrangement will be made with

barricading on the Site

boundary to ensure that the

traffic and the stray cattle are

not exposed to the construction

activities.

7 Health impacts – on

mental, physical, and

social well being.

The proposed project will not

adversely impact the mental,

physical and social well being.

Expectations in Fair pay,

employee care, social

responsibility commitments etc.

will be timely met. Grievance

redressal mechanism will be

made to handle complaints

from the study area.

8. Loss/ gain of health &

fitness in short term (<1)

or long term (>1):

The deterioration in health &

fitness of the habitation will be

negligible for a temporary phase

during construction activities.

Health checkup of labour to

trace the developments and

control any ill-consequences

during construction activities.

9. Loss/gain of view for the

study area inhabitants:

Plantation & landscaping will be

done;

Cleanliness will be maintained

in and around the group

housing premises during

construction and post

construction phases.

10. Loss/gain of culture and

religion: It is clearly stated

in as per the Human

Rights, that the obligation

of States is to promote

The proposed project will follow

universal respect for, and

observance and protection of,

human rights and fundamental

freedoms for all.

The proposed project will

promote neither selective, nor

relative, but universal respect

through contribution in various

festivities, equal observance




universal respect for, and

observance of, culture &

religion.

and protection among

employees and societies at

large in all community

activities.

TERTIARY IMPACTS

S.no Socio-economic Issues :

Impacts (reasons for variations & bias of representative data).


11 Economic benefits to

immediate community

and public revenue.

If the proposed group housing project

operationalizes, then it is expected to

appreciate the land prices of the

LIG/MIG housing and petty shops in

the vicinity (in 2.0 k.m. vicinity).

The project after its

commencement and

operation will generate

revenue for government, as

registry, stamp duty and

House tax, to J.D.A.

12 The project is

committed towards

CSR/ ESR with

respect to its

applicability with, The

Companies Act 2013.

The proposed project aims to

contribute to sustainable community

development in the concerned areas

of self sustainable employment

opportunities.

--

Socio Economic Parameter Importance Impact Unit profile

Social Impact Unit for Projects

Socio Economic

Environment Factors

Degree of Importance Degree of Impact

High(3) Medium(2) Low(1) High(+3) Medium (+2) Low(+1)

Housing requirements 3 - - - - +1

Local Employment long

term post operation:

3 - - - - +1

Indirect Employment 3 - - - +2 -

Development from

externalities - 2 - - - +1

Group housing V/s

Independent Houses - 2 - - - +1

Higher amount of - 2 - - - +1




government revenue

generation.

Impact to households in

1 k.m. vicinity. 3 - - - +2 -

No Loss of view

- - 1 - - +1

No Loss of culture

- 2 - - - +1

SIU : +33.34

Inference of Socio Economic Parameter Importance Impact Unit profile :

As there is zero (0) socio-economic threat and

no negative impact assessed the project

expansion is not harmful. As per the analysis

of SIU profile, proposed project enters in the

category of low positive moderate +33.34

social importance, for the society and local

commerce, and will moderately (& positively)

impact the socio- economic aspects. It is

studies that the project is neither harmful nor

negative impact to the society at large.

Corporate / Entrepreneur Social Responsibility:-

The project is committed towards CSR/ ESR with respect to its applicability with, The

Companies Act 2013.

S. No. Activity as per Schedule VII : Capital Cost # INR Lacs

I Year II Year III Year

1. Self Sustainable skill generation for the Youth &

Women :

Income based activity training for Youth & Women in

the following ways in the study area :

• Dried Leaves of Methi/ Thyme/ Coriander

• Dried Peas and other pulses

• Local edible Savories.

5.5 4.5 4.5

SIU Inference

0 to - 100 Negative impact , Harmful

0 Neither Negative nor

Positive

1 to +25 Low positive Impact

+25 to +50 Low positive Moderate

Impact

+50 to +75 Moderately positive Impact

+75 to +100 High Positive Impact




Workshops for Self sustainability to the study area

incumbents in consultation with the families of the

beneficiaries. The products can be sold in Muhana

Mandi terminal Market.

2. Arrangment of Health & Road Safety Camps for the

local residents nad truckers and Bus drivers commuting

around Muhana settlement :

• Camps for Defensive driving

• Camps for First Aid during road accidents or

sun-stroke

12.5 6.75 6.25

3. Toilet renovation with regular maintenance & flushing

facility.

• Muhana tallab 770 m W

• Aanganbadi Kendra, Muhana 790 m W

7.5 1.25 1.25

Total 25.5 12.5 12.0

Capital Cost: INR 50.0 Lacs

***********************

CONCEPTUAL PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLANenvironmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/FormB/EC/EIA_EMP/... · Project: Manglam Tarang CP & EMP Promoted by: Manglam Build Developers

Documents

CONCEPTUAL PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLANenvironmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/FormB/EC/EIA_EMP/... · Project: Manglam Tarang CP & EMP Promoted by: Manglam Build Developers