Arlington High School · Arlington High School Schtic ign Rort IV-6 Town of Arlington 02/11/2019 Arlington High School Arlington, MA Schematic Design Estimate - Reconciled Direct

Arlington High SchoolARLINGTON , M A

SCHEMATIC DESIGN BINDER 2 20 2019

VO LU M E I V O F I V

H M F H A R C H I T E C T S130 Bishop Allen Drive Cambridge, MA 02139 617 492 2200 hmfh.com

Arlington High School Schematic Design Binder

F E B R UA RY 20, 2019

VO LU M E I V O F I V

Arlington High School Schematic Design Report IV-2

Table of Contents

Volume I of IV

4.1.1 DESE Submittal

Volume II of IV

Acknowledgment4.1.2 Schematic Design Binder 4.1.2.1 Introduction 4.1.2.2 Final Design Program 4.1.2.3 Traffic Analysis 4.1.2.4 Environmental and Existing Building Assessment 4.1.2.5 Geotechnical and Geo-environmental Analysis 4.1.2.6 Code Analysis 4.1.2.7 Utility Analysis 4.1.2.8 Massing Study 4.1.2.9 Building Systems Narratives 4.1.2.10 Sustainable Building Design Guidelines Documents 4.1.2.11 ADA Analysis 4.1.2.12 Room Data Sheets 4.1.2.13 Proposed Construction Methodology 4.1.2.14 District’s Anticipated Reimbursement Rate 4.1.2.15 Total Project Budget 4.1.2.16 Designer’s Construction Cost Estimate 4.1.2.17 OPM’s Construction Cost Estimate 4.1.2.18 Updated Project Work Plan 4.1.2.19 Local Actions and Approvals

Appendices A Total Project Budget Worksheet and Budget Statement B MSBA Board Visual Aids C MSBA PSR Review and District Response D Updated Educational Space Summary E Traffic Impact Analysis F Updated Hazardous Materials Identification Study

Arlington High School Schematic Design ReportIV-3

Table of Contents

Volume III of IV

Appendices Continued G Geotechnical and Geo-environmental Analysis Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Preliminary Soil Management and Environmental Considerations Report H Wetlands Buffer Zone Diagrams I Flow Test Results J LEED Scorecard and Designers Statement K Room Data Sheets L Anticipated Reimbursement Rate M Designer’s Construction Cost Estimate

Volume IV of IV

Appendices Continued N OPM’s Construction Cost Estimate O Updated Project Work Plan P Local Actions and Approval Letters

4.1.3 Schematic Design Project Manual ( Bound Separately) 4.1.4 Schematic Design Drawings (Bound Separately)


N. OPM’s Construction Cost Estimate


Town of Arlington 02/11/2019

Arlington High SchoolArlington, MASchematic Design Estimate - Reconciled

Direct Cost Summary

Description Total $/SF

414,500

A10 Foundation $13,363,661 $32.24A20 Basements $0 $0.00B10 Superstructure $21,796,265 $52.58B20 Exterior Closure $21,706,753 $52.37B30 Roofing $4,595,235 $11.09C10 Interior Construction $16,626,046 $40.11C20 Stairs $1,810,283 $4.37C30 Interior Finishes $12,629,324 $30.47D10 Conveying $595,000 $1.44D20 Plumbing $6,632,000 $16.00D30 H.V.A.C. $24,942,863 $60.18D40 Fire Protection $2,072,500 $5.00D50 Electrical/AV $15,472,225 $37.33E10 Equipment $3,325,342 $8.02E20 Furnishings $2,720,978 $6.56F10 Special Construction $0 $0.00Z10 GR's with Trades $0 $0.00

Total Building Cost $148,288,475 $357.75

G10 Site Preparation $4,543,924 $10.96G20 Site Improvements $9,687,081 $23.37G30 Site Mechanical Utilities $1,504,720 $3.63G40 Site Electrical Utilities $846,855 $2.04

Total Site Cost $16,582,580 $40.01

F20 Demolition $7,502,671 $18.10F20 Hazardous Materials $0 $0.00

Total Demo Cost $7,502,671 $18.10

Sub Total Construction Costs $172,373,726 $415.86

8.00% Design & Pricing Contingency $13,789,898 $33.279.00% Escalation $15,513,635 $37.43

Subtotal $201,677,259 $486.56

Page 1


Town of Arlington 02/11/2019

Arlington High SchoolArlington, MASchematic Design Estimate - Reconciled

Direct Cost Summary

5.00% General Conditions $10,083,863 $24.334.00% General Requirements $8,067,090 $19.460.75% Bonds $1,512,579 $3.651.10% Insurance $2,218,450 $5.350.00% Permit $0 $0.00

Subtotal $223,559,242 $539.35

2.25% Overhead And Fee $5,030,083 $12.143.00% GMP Contingency $6,706,777 $16.180.00% Phasing (Included in Trade Costs) $0 $0.00

Total Construction Cost $235,296,102 $567.66

Page 2


Estimate Detail Arlington HS Reconciled SD Est 02-11-2019

Description Qty Unit Cost Amount--- - Base

A10 - FOUNDATIONSA1010 - Standard Foundations

A1010.010 - Wall Foundations1 4'x1' Frost Wall - Forms (1,348 lf) 8,088.00 sf 10.00 80,880

2 4'x1' Frost Wall - Rebar 18,198.00 lb 1.35 24,567

3 4'x1' Frost Wall - Concrete 161.00 cy 210.00 33,810

4 4'x1' Frost Wall - Finishing 1,348.00 sf 1.00 1,348

5 Athletic Toilet Facility Foundations 1.00 ea 210,000.00 210,000

A1010.010 - Wall Foundations 350,605A1010.030 - Strip Footings

6 Excavate Strip Footings 271.00 cy 25.00 6,775

7 Backfill Strip Footings 178.00 cy 25.00 4,450

8 Load / Haul / Dump Strip Footing Spoils 197.00 tn 20.00 3,940

9 3'x1' Strip Footing - Forms (1,044 lf) 2,088.00 sf 8.00 16,704

10 6'x3' Strip Footing - Forms (358 lf) 2,148.00 sf 9.00 19,332

11 6'x3' Strip Footing - Rebar (358 lf) 47,360.00 lb 1.35 63,936

12 3'x1' Strip Footing - Rebar (1,044 lf) 1,247.00 lb 1.35 1,683

13 3'x1' Strip Footing - Concrete (1,044 lf) 125.00 cy 210.00 26,250

14 6'x3' Strip Footing - Concrete (358 lf) 256.00 cy 210.00 53,760

15 3'x1' Strip Footing - Finishing (1,044 lf) 3,132.00 sf 1.00 3,132

16 6'x3' Strip Footing - Finishing (358 lf) 1,074.00 sf 1.00 1,074

A1010.030 - Strip Footings 201,036A1010.110 - Spread Footings

17 Excavate Spread Footings 1,495.00 cy 25.00 37,375

18 Backfill Spread Footings 1,129.00 cy 25.00 28,225

19 Load / Haul / Dump Spread Footings Spoils 925.00 tn 20.00 18,500

20 SF1 - 8'6"x8'6"x2'0", Finishing (96 Each) 6,936.00 sf 1.00 6,936

21 SF1 - 8'6"x8'6"x2'0", Concrete (96 Each) 565.00 cy 210.00 118,650

22 SF1 - 8'6"x8'6"x2'0", Forms (96 Each) 6,528.00 sf 12.00 78,336

23 SF1 - 8'6"x8'6"x2'0", Rebar (96 Each) 113,738.00 lb 1.35 153,546

A1010.110 - Spread Footings 441,568A1010.120 - Pile Caps

24 Backfill Pile Caps 925.00 cy 25.00 23,125

Arlington High SchoolTown of ArlingtonArlington, MA2/11/2019 5:00:00 PM

Estimate Type: Schematic DesignProject No.: 52-1317826-000Revision: ReconciledBuilding Area: 414,500 sf

Skanska USA Building Inc

,

Grouping: MasterGrp / Uniformat2 / Uniformat3 / Uniformat4




A10 - FOUNDATIONSA1010 - Standard Foundations

A1010.120 - Pile Caps25 Excavate Pile Caps 1,465.00 cy 25.00 36,625

26 Load / Haul / Dump Pile Cap Spoils 1,622.00 tn 20.00 32,440

27 PC3 - 2'9"x6'0"x2'0", Rebar (1 Each) 309.00 lb 1.35 417

28 PC2 - 6'7"x6'7"x2'6", Concrete (69 Each) 304.00 cy 210.00 63,840

29 PC2 - 6'7"x6'7"x2'6", Forms (69 Each) 4,540.00 sf 12.00 54,480

30 PC1 - 8'2"x8'2"x3'0", Finishing (89 Each) 5,941.00 sf 1.00 5,941

31 PC1 - 8'2"x8'2"x3'0", Rebar (89 Each) 166,998.00 lb 1.35 225,447

32 PC1 - 8'2"x8'2"x3'0", Forms (89 Each) 8,726.00 sf 12.00 104,712

33 PC3 - 2'9"x6'0"x2'0", Concrete (1 Each) 1.00 cy 210.00 210

34 PC2 - 6'7"x6'7"x2'6", Finishing (69 Each) 2,987.00 sf 1.00 2,987

35 Thickened Slab at Intermediate Piles 14.00 cy 850.00 11,900

36 PC3 - 2'9"x6'0"x2'0", Finishing (1 Each) 17.00 sf 1.50 26

37 PC3 - 2'9"x6'0"x2'0", Forms (1 Each) 35.00 sf 12.00 420

38 PC2 - 6'7"x6'7"x2'6", Rebar (69 Each) 69,984.00 lb 1.35 94,478

39 PC1 - 8'2"x8'2"x3'0", Concrete (89 Each) 726.00 cy 210.00 152,460

A1010.120 - Pile Caps 809,508A1010.130 - Column Piers

40 2'x2' Pier - Forms (49 Each) 1,568.00 sf 14.00 21,952

41 2'x2' Pier - Rebar (49 Each) 6,282.00 tn 1.35 8,481

42 2'x2' Pier - Finishing (49 Each) 196.00 sf 1.50 294

43 2'x2' Pier - Concrete (49 Each) 31.00 cy 225.00 6,975

A1010.130 - Column Piers 37,702A1010.150 - Grade Beam

44 Load / Haul / Dump Grade Beam Spoils 2,801.00 tn 20.00 56,020

45 Excavate Grade Beams 6,225.00 cy 25.30 157,504

46 Backfill Grade Beams 5,369.00 cy 25.00 134,225

47 Rigid Insulation at Bldg Perimeter - Exterior Face 6,059.00 sf 3.50 21,207

48 2'0"x2'6" d. Grade Beam - Bracing (50 plf Rebar) 303.00 lf 205.00 62,115

49 Rigid Insulation at Bldg Perimeter - Interior Face 6,059.00 sf 3.50 21,207

50 2'0"x2'6" d. Grade Beam - Interior (75 plf Rebar) 1,758.00 lf 240.00 421,920

51 2'0"x3'6" d. Grade Beam - Perimeter (90 plf Rebar) 1,731.00 lf 313.00 541,803

A1010.150 - Grade Beam 1,416,000A1010 - Standard Foundations 3,256,420

A1020 - Special FoundationsA1020.090 - Pressure Injected Footings

52 Dispose of Spoils 198.00 tn 20.00 3,960





A10 - FOUNDATIONSA1020 - Special Foundations

A1020.090 - Pressure Injected Footings53 Cutoff Piles - NA - -

54 Prepare Pile Tops 831.00 ea 500.00 415,500

55 Pile Load Test - Compression 1.00 ea 40,000.00 40,000

56 Mobilization / Demobilization 1.00 ls 50,000.00 50,000

57 Pile Layout 1.00 ea 10,000.00 10,000

58 Breakage (4%), Allowance 32.00 ea 2,500.00 80,000

59 Pre-Auger 15' 12,105.00 lf 18.00 217,890

60 PIFS - 10" Diameter 721.00 ea 2,549.77 1,838,385

61 PIFS - 10" Diameter at Intermediate Slab Support 110.00 ea 2,549.77 280,475

A1020.090 - Pressure Injected Footings 2,936,210A1020.500 - Cofferdams

62 Soldier Beams and Lagging 20' - 30' Deep (Includes Tie-backs)

11,700.00 sf 70.00 819,000

A1020.500 - Cofferdams 819,000A1020 - Special Foundations 3,755,210

A1030 - Slab on GradeA1030.010 - Standard Slab On Grade

63 RAP System at Spread Footings - South Side Bldg 60,305.00 sf 14.00 844,270

64 Moisture Mitigation (See Flooring) - NA - -

65 6" Slab on Grade - Rebar 40,284.00 lb 1.35 54,383

66 Vapor Barrier 60,305.00 sf 0.50 30,153

67 Auditorium Slab 1,434.00 sf 25.00 35,850

68 6" Slab on Grade - Concrete 1,201.00 cy 210.00 252,210

69 2" Rigid Insulation 60,305.00 sf 3.75 226,144

70 6" Slab on Grade - Finishing 60,305.00 sf 1.00 60,305

71 6" Slab on Grade - Forms 885.00 sf 8.00 7,080

72 12" Structural Fill Under SOG 2,569.00 cy 35.00 89,915

73 Preprufe Waterproofing Underslab 60,305.00 sf 8.00 482,440

A1030.010 - Standard Slab On Grade 2,082,750A1030.100 - Structural Slab On Grade

74 Site Fills Under Bldg Footprint (3.5' - 6') 19,464.00 cy 35.00 681,240

75 Underdrain System - NA - -

76 3" Mud Slab - NA - -

77 12" Structural Slab on Grade - Concrete 3,476.00 cy 210.00 729,960

78 12" Structural Slab on Grade - Rebar (7#/sf) 742,076.00 lb 1.35 1,001,803

79 2" Rigid Insulation 87,303.00 sf 3.75 327,386





A10 - FOUNDATIONSA1030 - Slab on Grade

A1030.100 - Structural Slab On Grade80 Vapor Barrier 87,303.00 sf 0.50 43,652

81 12" Structural Slab on Grade - Forms 1,182.00 sf 8.00 9,456

82 12" Fill Under SSOG 3,720.00 cy 22.00 81,840

83 Moisture Mitigation (See Flooring) - NA - -

84 12" Structural Slab on Grade - Finishing 87,303.00 sf 1.00 87,303

85 Preprufe Waterproofing Underslab 87,303.00 sf 8.00 698,424

A1030.100 - Structural Slab On Grade 3,661,063A1030.400 - Pits & Bases

86 Waterproofing - Sump Pits, Allowance 2.00 ea 1,500.00 3,000

87 Misc. Sump Pits, Allowance 2.00 ea 2,500.00 5,000

88 Elevator Pit 2.00 ea 35,000.00 70,000

89 Waterproofing - Elev. Pit 2.00 ea 5,000.00 10,000

A1030.400 - Pits & Bases 88,000A1030 - Slab on Grade 5,831,813

A2020 - Basement WallsA2020.100 - Cast in Place Concrete Basement Walls

90 Basement Wall 1'6" t. x 22'0" h. - Forms 15,752.00 sf 20.00 315,040

91 Basement Wall 1'6" t. x 22'0" h. - Concrete 417.00 cy 240.00 100,080

92 Basement Wall 1'6" t. x 22'0" h. - Rebar 77,145.00 tn 1.35 104,146

93 Basement Wall 1'6" t. x 22'0" h. - Finishing 476.00 sf 2.00 952

A2020.100 - Cast in Place Concrete Basement Walls 520,218A2020 - Basement Walls 520,218

A10 - FOUNDATIONS 13,363,661B10 - SUPERSTRUCTURE

B1010 - Floor ConstructionB1010.020 - Floor Structural Frame

94 LT Redimix - Slab on Metal Deck 4,125.00 cy 200.00 825,000

95 Place and Finish Slab on Deck 297,928.00 sf 1.10 327,721

96 Concrete at Stairs - W/ Vert

- -

97 Add for Gymnasium - Double Concrete Slab - (8" Thick 16,285 SF)

402.00 cy 200.00 80,400

98 Place and Finish Slab on Metal Deck at Gymnasium and ALT PE Rooms

26,453.00 sf 1.10 29,098

99 Mechanical 6" Concrete Pads 1,497.00 sf 25.00 37,425

100 Moisture Mitigation - Barrier 1 (At All Slab on Deck Concrete)

- NA - -

101 Allow for... Isolated pours and/or Floor Recesses 1.00 ls 30,000.00 30,000





B10 - SUPERSTRUCTUREB1010 - Floor Construction

B1010.020 - Floor Structural Frame102 Allow for... Interior Concrete Curbs 500.00 lf 65.00 32,500

103 Allow for... Floor Leveling at 10% of Placement Area 32,438.00 sf 5.50 178,409

104 Allow for... Sleeve and Embedment Coordination 1.00 ls 10,000.00 10,000

105 Allow for... Double Slab of 35% at Kitchen Location 1,088.00 sf 5.62 6,115

106 Add for ALT PE - Double Concrete Slab - (8" Thick 10,168 SF)

251.00 cy 200.00 50,200

107 Moisture Mitigation - Barrier 1 (At All Slab on Deck Concrete) at Gymnasium and ALT PE Rooms

- NA - -

108 Cast-In-Place Concrete - Grand Stairs 310.00 lf 800.00 248,000

109 Anchor Bolts and Base Plates 229.00 ea 200.00 45,800

110 Elevator Sill Angles (One per Opening) 14.00 ea 170.00 2,380

111 Sump Pit Grate and Frame 3.00 ea 700.00 2,100

112 6" Pipe Bollards at Loading Dock (Allow for...) 10.00 ea 1,500.00 15,000

113 Loading Dock Ramp Railing (Allow for...) 55.00 lf 285.00 15,675

114 Steel Beams 1,970.88 tn 3,800.00 7,489,344

115 CMU Clip Angles - Every 4' 1,231.00 ea 180.00 221,580

116 Galvanized Rooftop Steel Support for Screen Walls (Allow for… 125#/LF)

45.00 tn 3,800.00 171,000

117 Structural Skylight Framing (Allow for...24 #/LF) 16.10 tn 3,800.00 61,180

118 Metal Grade Mezzanine 10,680.00 sf 60.00 640,800

119 Galv Steel Support - Overhead Doors 0.95 tn 6,500.00 6,175

120 Steel Support at Operable Partition 312.00 lf 315.00 98,280

121 Steel Support for Exterior Fins (Allow for... 10 #/LF) 7.50 tn 4,200.00 31,500

122 Galv Steel Lintel at Exterior Wall - Single Door 3.00 ea 550.00 1,650

123 Vanity Support Framing - Not Req

- -

124 Metal Pan Stairs - W/ Vert

- -

125 Railings at Metal Pan Stairs - W/ Vert

- -

126 Steel Support at Metal Canopy at Loading Dock (Allow for... 17#/SF)

39.30 tn 4,200.00 165,060

127 Cont. Steel Angle at Perimeter of Gymnasium Floor (Allow for... 50 #/LF total of 513 LF)

11.30 tn 4,200.00 47,460

128 Cable Net Support Beam at Exterior Curtain Wall ( Allow for... 55 #/ LF)

3.33 tn 4,200.00 13,986

129 Elevator Operator - NA - -

130 Miscl. Connections, Plates, Bolts, e.t.c. - (Allow for...12%)

316.64 tn 3,800.00 1,203,232

131 Steel Columns 576.13 tn 3,800.00 2,189,294

132 Misc. Steel for Safety Tie Off System at Roof (Allow for... Every 27' LF)

202.00 ea 500.00 101,000






B1010.020 - Floor Structural Frame133 Galvanized Rooftop Dunnage (Allow for... 10#/SF) 60.54 tn 3,800.00 230,052

134 Steel Support for Punched Openings (Allow for... 12 #/LF)

22.00 tn 4,200.00 92,400

135 Galv Steel Lintel at Exterior Wall - Double Doors 4.00 pair 850.00 3,400

136 Roof Ladders (Allow for... 5 ea at 10 lf) 50.00 lf 600.00 30,000

137 Misc. Steel Support at Gymnasium Basketball Equipment 6.00 loc 1,200.00 7,200

138 Elevator Host Beam 3.00 ea 2,500.00 7,500

139 Operating Engineer - NA - -

140 Elevator Pit Ladders 3.00 ea 1,500.00 4,500

141 Dock Leveler Pit Frame 3.00 ea 1,300.00 3,900

142 Steel Bracing 198.86 tn 3,800.00 755,668

143 Toilet Partition Support Framing - Not Req

- -

144 Moment Connections - Allow for 6 moments per column in Auditorium

198.00 ea 1,500.00 297,000

145 Catwalks and Rigging - 3' Wide x 120' Long at Auditorium Level 5

360.00 sf 125.00 45,000

146 Steel Support for TV/Monitors (Allow for... 1 per Classroom)

- NA - -

147 Railings at Metal Grade Mezzanine 663.00 lf 285.00 188,955

148 Cont. Steel Angle at Perimeter of ALT PE Floor (Allow for... 50 #/LF total of 570 LF)

12.55 tn 4,200.00 52,710

149 Hoisting - NA - -

150 Temporary Protection at other Floor/ Roof Openings - NA - -

B1010.020 - Floor Structural Frame 16,095,649B1010.117 - Steel Joists

151 Steel Joists 129.36 tn 3,800.00 491,568

B1010.117 - Steel Joists 491,568B1010.200 - Expansion Control

152 Expansion Joints 2,000.00 lf 150.00 300,000

B1010.200 - Expansion Control 300,000B1010.315 - Metal Deck / Concrete Filled

153 Add for Mesh in Slab on Deck at Gymnasium Double Concrete Slab

16,285.00 sf 0.50 8,142

154 Add for Mesh in Slab on Deck at ALT PE Double Concrete Slab

10,168.00 sf 0.50 5,084

155 Mesh in Slab on Deck 297,928.00 sf 0.50 148,964

156 1 1/2" Deep 18" Gauge Galvanized Composite Metal Deck

95,078.00 sf 1.75 166,387

157 2" Deep 18" Gauge Galvanized Composite Metal Deck 293,726.00 sf 3.00 881,178

158 Shear Connectors (25 per 100 sf of Floor Incl. Roof) 105,265.00 ea 5.00 526,325






B1010.315 - Metal Deck / Concrete Filled159 3" Deep 18/20" Gauge Galvanized Composite Metal

Deck32,256.00 sf 3.50 112,896

B1010.315 - Metal Deck / Concrete Filled 1,848,976B1010.650 - Fireproofing

160 Spray Fireproofing - Bracing - NA - -

161 Firestopping at Perimeter 18,326.00 lf 13.50 247,401

162 Allow for... Intumescent Paint 1.00 ls 150,000.00 150,000

163 Spray Fireproofing - Joists - NA - -

164 Spray Fireproofing - Beams 415,945.00 sf 2.50 1,039,863

165 Spray Fireproofing - Columns 104,315.00 sf 2.50 260,788

166 Spray Fireproofing - Deck (Roof Only) 144,649.00 sf 2.50 361,623

B1010.650 - Fireproofing 2,059,674B1010.750 - Misc. Floor Construction

167 Reinforcing at Slab on Deck - (Allow for... 0.5 #/SF) 74.48 tn 2,200.00 163,856

168 Add for Reinforcing at Gumnasium Double Concrete Slab - (Allow for... 0.5 #/SF)

4.07 tn 2,200.00 8,954

169 Add for Reinforcing at ALT PE Double Concrete Slab - (Allow for... 0.5 #/SF)

2.54 tn 2,200.00 5,588

B1010.750 - Misc. Floor Construction 178,398B1010 - Floor Construction 20,974,265

B1020 - Roof ConstructionB1020.400 - Canopies

170 Canopy 2,055.00 sf 400.00 822,000

B1020.400 - Canopies 822,000B1020 - Roof Construction 822,000

B10 - SUPERSTRUCTURE 21,796,265B20 - EXTERIOR CLOSURE

B2010 - Exterior WallsB2010.020 - Brick Veneer

171 Mock Ups 1.00 ls 150,000.00 150,000

172 Adjust Facade to remove funding for the resuse of Collumb House Facade

1.00 ea (1,865,000.00)

(1,865,000)

173 Final Cleaning; Masonry Brick Veneer - NA - -

174 Final Cleaning; Athletic Toilet Facility - NA - -

175 Final Cleaning; Generic Walls - NA - -

176 Masonry Brick Veneer Exterior Wall Silicon Sealer - NA - -

177 Masonry Brick Veneer Exterior Wall 2-1/4"x3-5/8"x7-5/8"; Athletic Toilet Facility

2,700.00 sf 40.00 108,000





B20 - EXTERIOR CLOSUREB2010 - Exterior Walls

B2010.020 - Brick Veneer178 Masonry Brick Veneer Exterior Wall 2-1/4"x3-5/8"x7-

5/8"123,839.00 sf 40.00 4,953,560

179 Masonry Brick Veneer Exterior Wall Silicon Sealer; Athletic Toilet Facility

- NA - -

180 6" Structural Metal Studs; Masonry Brick Veneer 123,839.00 sf 12.50 1,547,988

181 Rough Blocking; Masonry Brick Veneer 123,839.00 sf 0.30 37,152

182 Mineral Wool Insulation; Masonry Brick Veneer 123,839.00 sf 2.20 272,446

183 Air / Vapor Barriers; Masonry Brick Veneer 123,839.00 sf 8.50 1,052,632

184 Sealants and Caulking; Masonry Brick Veneer 123,839.00 sf 1.00 123,839

185 5/8" Fire-Resistant Gypsum Interior Board; Masonry Brick Veneer

123,839.00 sf 2.75 340,557

186 Gypsum; Exterior Sheathing 1/2"; Masonry Brick Veneer 123,839.00 sf 2.50 309,598

187 Scaffolding; Masonry Brick Veneer 123,839.00 sf 2.50 309,598

B2010.020 - Brick Veneer 7,340,368B2010.055 - Siding

188 Final Cleaning; IPE - NA - -

189 6" Structural Metal Studs; IPE 2,894.00 sf 12.50 36,175

190 Rough Blocking; IPE 2,894.00 sf 0.30 868

191 3/4" Plywood Sheathing; IPE 2,894.00 sf 2.25 6,512

192 Waterproofing Underlayment; IPE 2,894.00 sf 1.50 4,341

193 Mineral Wool Insulation; IPE 2,894.00 sf 2.20 6,367

194 Air / Vapor Barriers; IPE 2,894.00 sf 8.50 24,599

195 IPE Exterior Wall Siding 2,894.00 sf 60.00 173,640

196 Sealants and Caulking; IPE 2,894.00 sf 1.00 2,894

197 Continuous 'Z' Furring; IPE 2,894.00 sf 3.00 8,682

198 5/8" Fire-Resistant Gypsum Interior Board; IPE 2,894.00 sf 2.75 7,959

199 Gypsum; Exterior Sheathing 1/2"; IPE 2,894.00 sf 2.50 7,235

200 Scaffolding; IPE 2,894.00 sf 2.00 5,788

B2010.055 - Siding 285,059B2010.075 - Metal Siding Panels

201 Final Cleaning; Metal Siding - NA - -

202 Final Cleaning; Metal Screen - NA - -

203 6" Structural Metal Studs; Metal Screen 5,302.00 sf 12.50 66,275

204 6" Structural Metal Studs; Metal Siding 32,997.00 sf 12.50 412,463

205 Rough Blocking; Metal Screen 5,302.00 sf 0.30 1,591

206 Rough Blocking; Metal Siding 32,997.00 sf 0.30 9,899

207 3/4" Plywood Sheathing; Metal Siding 32,997.00 sf 2.25 74,243






B2010.075 - Metal Siding Panels208 Waterproofing Underlayment; Metal Siding 32,997.00 sf 1.50 49,496

209 Mineral Wool Insulation; Metal Siding 32,997.00 sf 2.20 72,593

210 Air / Vapor Barriers; Metal Screen 5,302.00 sf 4.00 21,208

211 Air / Vapor Barriers; Metal Siding 32,997.00 sf 4.00 131,988

212 7/8" Corrugated Metal Panel Siding With Concealed Fasteners (Acoustic Metal Screen Wall)

5,302.00 sf 32.00 169,664

213 7/8" Subgrit (16 Gauge Min); Metal Siding 32,997.00 sf 3.00 98,991

214 7/8" Subgrit (16 Gauge Min); Metal Screen 5,302.00 sf 3.00 15,906

215 Flat Seam Copper Siding 16'-0"x6'-0" Panels Running Vertically W/ 1/3 RD Bond Stagger

32,997.00 sf 40.00 1,319,880

216 Reduce 30% of Cpooer siding and use brick veneer 1.00 ea (556,611.00) (556,611)

217 Sealants and Caulking; Metal Screen 5,302.00 sf 1.00 5,302

218 Sealants and Caulking; Metal Siding 32,997.00 sf 1.00 32,997

219 5/8" Fire-Resistant Gypsum Interior Board; Metal Siding 32,997.00 sf 2.75 90,742

220 5/8" Fire-Resistant Gypsum Interior Board; Metal Screen 5,302.00 sf 2.75 14,581

221 Gypsum; Exterior Sheathing 1/2"; Metal Screen 5,302.00 sf 2.50 13,255

222 Gypsum; Exterior Sheathing 1/2"; Metal Siding 32,997.00 sf 2.50 82,493

223 Scaffolding; Metal Siding 32,997.00 sf 2.50 82,493

224 Scaffolding; Metal Screen 5,302.00 sf 2.50 13,255

B2010.075 - Metal Siding Panels 2,222,702B2010.085 - Water Repellents & Joints Sealers

225 Air / Vapor Barriers; Athletic Toilet Facility 2,700.00 sf 4.00 10,800

226 Air / Vapor Barriers; Temporary Exterior Wall 26,000.00 sf 4.00 104,000

227 Air / Vapor Barriers; Generic Walls 5,000.00 sf 4.00 20,000

228 Sealants and Caulking; Temporary Exterior Wall 26,000.00 sf 1.00 26,000

229 Sealants and Caulking; Generic Walls 5,000.00 sf 1.00 5,000

230 Sealants and Caulking; Athletic Toilet Facility 2,700.00 sf 1.00 2,700

B2010.085 - Water Repellents & Joints Sealers 168,500B2010.090 - High Performance Coating / Paints

231 Exterior Stucco; Exterior Temporary Wall - NA - -

232 Exterior Stucco; Generic Walls - NA - -

B2010.090 - High Performance Coating / Paints -B2010.130 - Metal Framed Exterior Walls

233 6" Structural Metal Studs; Temporary Exterior Wall 26,000.00 sf 12.50 325,000

234 Temporary Exterior Wall Maintenance/ Repair 26,000.00 sf 5.00 130,000

235 6" Structural Metal Studs 5,000.00 sf 12.50 62,500

B2010.130 - Metal Framed Exterior Walls 517,500






B2010.200 - Exterior Wall Vapor Retarders & Insulation236 Mineral Wool Insulation; Temporary Exterior Wall 26,000.00 sf 2.20 57,200

237 Mineral Wool Insulation; Metal Screen 5,302.00 sf 2.20 11,664

238 Mineral Wool Insulation; Athletic Toilet Facility 2,700.00 sf 2.20 5,940

239 Mineral Wool Insulation; Generic Walls 5,000.00 sf 2.20 11,000

B2010.200 - Exterior Wall Vapor Retarders & Insulation 85,804B2010.700 - Exterior Soffits

240 Exterior Soffits - Under Main Building 6,200.00 sf 45.00 279,000

241 Exterior Soffits - Under Entrance Overhangs 1,990.00 sf 65.00 129,350

B2010.700 - Exterior Soffits 408,350B2010.800 - Misc. Exterior Walls

242 Salvaged And Restored Wood Columns And Entablature Structural Frame System, New Brick Arches And Stone Base And Trim To Match Existing

1.00 ls 2,500,000.00 2,500,000

243 Reduce Allowance of Facade Restoration (1.00) ls 1,000,000.00 (1,000,000)

244 Scaffolding Walls 5,000.00 sf 2.50 12,500

245 Scaffolding Exterior Temporary Wall 26,000.00 sf 2.50 65,000

246 Scaffolding Athletic Toilet Facility 2,700.00 sf 2.50 6,750

B2010.800 - Misc. Exterior Walls 1,584,250B2010.900 - Exterior Miscellaneous Metals

247 Metal Roof Trellis Vertical Members 888.00 lf 75.00 66,600

248 Metal Roof Trellis Horizontal Members 3,530.00 lf 75.00 264,750

B2010.900 - Exterior Miscellaneous Metals 331,350B2010 - Exterior Walls 12,943,883

B2020 - Exterior WindowsB2020.000 - Exterior Windows

249 Exterior Window System (Typical) 306.00 sf 70.00 21,420

B2020.000 - Exterior Windows 21,420B2020.210 - Metal Framed Curtain Wall

250 Final Cleaning; Curtainwall - NA - -

251 Sealants and Caulking; Glass And Glazing 39,200.00 sf 1.00 39,200

252 Punched Curtain Wall System (Premium) At Gymnasium 6,609.00 sf 130.00 859,170

253 Self Supporting Curtain Wall At Main Entrance 2,528.00 sf 200.00 505,600

254 Security Glazing 2,600.00 sf 30.00 78,000

255 Mullions 3,500.00 lf 50.00 175,000

256 Punched Curtain Wall System (Premium) At Auditorium 1,704.00 sf 130.00 221,520

257 Typical Curtain Wall System 36,949.00 sf 120.00 4,433,880

258 Punched Curtain Wall System (Premium) 26,311.00 sf 30.00 789,330





B20 - EXTERIOR CLOSUREB2020 - Exterior Windows

B2020.210 - Metal Framed Curtain Wall259 Scaffolding; Curtainwall 39,200.00 sf 2.50 98,000

B2020.210 - Metal Framed Curtain Wall 7,199,700B2020.220 - Glazed Aluminum Curtain Wall

260 Exterior IPE Vertical Wood Sunshades, 1' Deep 1,703.00 lf 200.00 340,600

261 Exterior Aluminum Sunscreens, With Mahogany Slats 7,191.00 sf 150.00 1,078,650

262 Reduce Sunshades 1.00 ea (156,000.00) (156,000)

B2020.220 - Glazed Aluminum Curtain Wall 1,263,250B2020 - Exterior Windows 8,484,370

B2030 - Exterior DoorsB2030.000 - Exterior Doors

263 Exterior Single Door And Frame - Balanced Doors 9.00 ea 4,000.00 36,000

264 Exterior Double Door And Frame - Balanced Doors 19.00 ea 8,500.00 161,500

265 ADA Automatic Door Operator 4.00 ea 6,000.00 24,000

266 Exterior Hardware Sets Per Leaf 58.00 ea 500.00 29,000

B2030.000 - Exterior Doors 250,500B2030.200 - Exterior Metal Doors & Frames

267 Exterior Double HM Steel Door And Frame 5.00 ea 5,000.00 25,000

268 Exterior Single HM Steel Door And Frame 1.00 ea 3,000.00 3,000

B2030.200 - Exterior Metal Doors & Frames 28,000B2030 - Exterior Doors 278,500

B20 - EXTERIOR CLOSURE 21,706,753B30 - ROOFING

B3010 - Roof CoveringsB3010.300 - Membrane Roofing

269 Thermoplastic Membrane Roofing Flat Insulation System (Typical - Assume 50% Area) - Sloped Structural System

58,209.00 sf 23.00 1,338,807

270 Wood Decking On Waterproofing Tapered Insulation System (Roof Deck Areas) - Flat Structural System

7,147.00 sf 50.00 357,350

271 Thermoplastic Membrane Roofing Tapered Insulation System (Under Rooftop Units) - Concrete Deck System

21,084.00 sf 23.00 484,932

272 Thermoplastic Membrane Roofing Flat Insulation System; Athletic Toilet Facility

1,900.00 sf 23.00 43,700

273 Thermoplastic Membrane Roofing Tapered Insulation System (Canopies) - Flat Structural System

1,990.00 sf 23.00 45,770

274 Thermoplastic Membrane Roofing Tapered Insulation System (Typical Tapered - Assume 50% Area) - Flat Structural System

58,209.00 sf 23.00 1,338,807

275 Trellis Penetrations 74.00 ea 750.00 55,500





B30 - ROOFINGB3010 - Roof Coverings

B3010.300 - Membrane Roofing276 Sheating Board, Primer, 2 Ply Hot Applied Rubberized

Asphalt Waterproofing Membrane And Protective Course Under Proposal Vegetative Roof Assembly

8,000.00 sf 25.00 200,000

277 Delete Roof Deck over Performing Arts Classroom and replace with PVC roofing

1.00 ea (178,456.00) (178,456)

278 EPDM Walkway Pads 2,700.00 sf 15.00 40,500

B3010.300 - Membrane Roofing 3,726,910B3010.500 - Sheet Metal Roofing

279 Metal Flashings 2,500.00 lf 35.00 87,500

280 4' High Metal Fascia And Trim 1,000.00 sf 75.00 75,000

B3010.500 - Sheet Metal Roofing 162,500B3010.600 - Roof Specialties & Accessories

281 Roof Accessories - Davit System 20 O.C. 178.00 ea 425.00 75,650

282 Roof Pavers With Pedestals 3,131.00 sf 50.00 156,550

B3010.600 - Roof Specialties & Accessories 232,200B3010 - Roof Coverings 4,121,610

B3020 - Roof OpeningsB3020.700 - Roof Specialties & Accessories

283 Roof Hatches & Misc. Accessories 3.00 ea 2,500.00 7,500

B3020.700 - Roof Specialties & Accessories 7,500B3020.710 - Skylights

284 Skylights - Continuous Skylight 700.00 sf 125.00 87,500

285 Skylights - Small Dome Skylight 13 SF EA 6.00 ea 1,625.00 9,750

286 Skylights - 4'x'4 Square Pyramid Skylight 16 SF (4'x4'; 16 SF)

38.00 ea 2,000.00 76,000

287 Skylights - Sloped Triangular Skylight 330 SF EA 2.00 ea 41,250.00 82,500

288 Skylights - Larger Dome Skylight 51 SF EA 13.00 ea 6,375.00 82,875

289 Skylights - Large Circular Skylight 510 SF EA 2.00 ea 63,750.00 127,500

B3020.710 - Skylights 466,125B3020 - Roof Openings 473,625

B30 - ROOFING 4,595,235C10 - INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION

C1010 - PartitionsC1010.040 - Masonry Partitions

290 Interior Brick Veneer 6,386.00 sf 28.00 178,808

291 Change Toilet from Brick to CMU 1.00 ea (44,045.00) (44,045)

C1010.040 - Masonry Partitions 134,763





C10 - INTERIOR CONSTRUCTIONC1010 - Partitions

C1010.050 - CMU Partitions292 CMU Partitions w/ Siesmic Clips 37,000.00 sf 26.00 962,000

C1010.050 - CMU Partitions 962,000C1010.080 - Metal Stud Partitions

293 Final Clean - NA - -

294 Daily Clean - NA - -

295 Temporary Protection - NA - -

296 Scaffolding; Interior, Gyms/Performing Arts/Band/Skylight

- NA - -

297 Dumpsters - NA - -

298 Scaffolding; Interior, Auditorium - NA - -

299 General Reduction in SF 1.00 ea (945,330.00) (945,330)

VM items V and Y

300 General Interior Caulking/Fire Safing 424,457.00 sf 0.25 106,114

301 5/8" Fire-Resistant Gypsum Interior Board; Temporary Wall

26,000.00 sf 2.75 71,500

302 5/8" Fire-Resistant Gypsum Interior Board; Generic Walls

5,000.00 sf 2.75 13,750

303 Gypsum; Exterior Sheathing 1/2"; Generic Walls 5,000.00 sf 2.50 12,500

304 Gypsum; Exterior Sheathing, Exterior Temporary Wall 26,000.00 sf 2.50 65,000

305 1. DH MS 1/1 Gyp w/ SAB 240,652.00 sf 8.25 1,985,379

306 12. DH 2 Row Stagger MS 2/2 Gyp w/ SAB 9,741.00 sf 17.00 165,597

307 Rated Stair/Elevator Shaft Wall 36,760.00 sf 16.00 588,160

308 Add For Cement Board @ Wet Walls 7,138.00 sf 1.75 12,492

309 Gyp Column Wraps 204.00 ea 400.00 81,600

310 3. DH MS 2/2 Gyp w/ SAB 51,117.00 sf 12.00 613,404

311 Chase Wall 12' H MS 1/0 Gyp 7,138.00 sf 8.00 57,104

312 2. DH MS 2/1 Gyp w/ SAB 87,116.00 sf 10.50 914,718

313 Isolation Partition: DH 2 Row Stagger MS 2/2 Gyp w/ SAB

1,650.00 sf 22.00 36,300

314 Add For Impact Rated @ Gym, Stairs, Quiet, Labs, Special Ed.

66,842.00 sf 2.00 133,684

C1010.080 - Metal Stud Partitions 3,911,972C1010.110 - Operable Partitions

315 NanaWall HSW60 14x10 2.00 ea 56,000.00 112,000

316 Operable Partition 112x18 (2016 sq-ft) 1.00 ea 141,120.00 141,120

317 Operable Partition 34.5x8 (276 sq-ft) 7.00 ea 20,000.00 140,000

C1010.110 - Operable Partitions 393,120C1010.300 - Interior Glazed Partitions & Storefront

318 Interior Curtainwall @ Skylight Returns 3,350.00 sf 90.00 301,500





C10 - INTERIOR CONSTRUCTIONC1010 - Partitions

C1010.300 - Interior Glazed Partitions & Storefront319 Glass/Alum Doors/Frames/Hardware to match

curtainwall18.00 ea 4,500.00 81,000

320 Acoustic Glass Assembly @ Performing Arts, Studio 560.00 sf 130.00 72,800

321 Fire Rated Glass Allowance - NA - -

322 Interior Ribbon Window 725.00 sf 80.00 58,000

323 Typ. Interior Alum Frame Punched Window 6,338.00 sf 80.00 507,040

324 Acoustic Rated Alum. Ribbon Window @ Control Room 80.00 sf 130.00 10,400

325 Interior Glazing Allowance for Undetailed - NA - -

326 Interior Curtainwall @ Vestbule, Open to Below 3,878.00 sf 90.00 349,020

327 Door Light Glass 150.00 ea 200.00 30,000

C1010.300 - Interior Glazed Partitions & Storefront 1,409,760C1010 - Partitions 6,811,615

C1020 - Interior DoorsC1020.000 - Interior Doors

328 Door Hardware per leaf 737.00 ea 650.00 479,050

C1020.000 - Interior Doors 479,050C1020.020 - Interior Metal Doors & Frames

329 Paint - HM Window Frames (NIC - all prefin aluminum) - ea - -

330 Paint - HM Single Frames 531.00 ea 125.00 66,375

331 Paint - Metal Doors, Latex Paint 30.00 ea 125.00 3,750

332 Paint - HM Double Frames 103.00 ea 125.00 12,875

C1020.020 - Interior Metal Doors & Frames 83,000C1020.030 - Interior Wood Doors & Frames

333 Double Wood Door 90x96 with HM Frame 4.00 ea 2,899.98 11,600


335 Single Wood Door 36x84 with HM Frame 390.00 ea 2,100.00 819,000

336 Single Wood Door 36x86 with HM Frame + Sidelight 3.00 ea 2,900.00 8,700

337 Acoustical Rated Double Doors 19.00 ea 8,500.00 161,500

338 Single Wood Door 36x86 with HM Frame 136.00 ea 2,100.00 285,600


340 Acoustical Rated Single Doors 2.00 ea 5,000.00 10,000

C1020.030 - Interior Wood Doors & Frames 1,520,400C1020.300 - Interior Special Doors

341 Glass Overhead Bi-Folding Door 12'-0"T x 20'-0"W 1.00 ea 36,000.00 36,000

342 Glass Overhead Bi-Folding Door 24'-0"T x 28'-0"W 1.00 ea 100,000.00 100,000

C1020.300 - Interior Special Doors 136,000





C10 - INTERIOR CONSTRUCTIONC1020 - Interior Doors 2,218,450

C1030 - Building SpecialtiesC1010.080 - Metal Stud Partitions

343 Uni-Strut Grid for Tech, Wood Labs 5,160.00 sf 22.00 113,520

344 Interior Column Cover - Allowance 1.00 ls 50,000.00 50,000

C1010.080 - Metal Stud Partitions 163,520C1010.300 - Interior Glazed Partitions & Storefront

345 Sheet Mirrors @ Fitness 1,895.00 sf 25.00 47,375

346 Sheet Mirrors @ Group Restooms 750.00 sf 25.00 18,750

C1010.300 - Interior Glazed Partitions & Storefront 66,125C1030.050 - Visual Display Boards

347 Visual Display Boards 414,500.00 sf 0.50 207,250

C1030.050 - Visual Display Boards 207,250C1030.150 - Interior Louvers & Vents

348 Fixed Aluminum Louver 270.00 sf 70.00 18,900

C1030.150 - Interior Louvers & Vents 18,900C1030.250 - Wall & Corner Guards

349 FRP Panels - Custodial Closets 1.00 ls 5,000.00 5,000

350 FRP Panels - Receiving/Loading 1.00 ls 5,000.00 5,000

C1030.250 - Wall & Corner Guards 10,000C1030.400 - Interior Identifying Devices

351 Exterior Signage 1.00 ls 50,000.00 50,000

352 Exterior Signage At Athletic Toilet Facility "Arlington Spy Ponders" (Allowance)

1.00 ls 40,000.00 40,000

353 Interior Signage & Environmental Graphics 414,500.00 sf 0.60 248,700

354 Exterior Signage At Main Lobby Entrance "Stainless Steel Signage" (Allowance)

1.00 ls 50,000.00 50,000

C1030.400 - Interior Identifying Devices 388,700C1030.500 - Lockers

355 Metal Lockers - Gym, 15"x15"x15" 2,000.00 ea 255.00 510,000

356 Metal Lockers - Team Lockers, 24"x22"x72" 100.00 ea 450.00 45,000

357 Metal Lockers - Band Lockers - NIC - NIC - -

358 Metal Lockers - Triple Tier, General Student 15"x15"x24"H

2,000.00 ea 150.00 300,000

C1030.500 - Lockers 855,000C1030.550 - Postal Boxes & Chutes

359 Mail box grid/cubbies 1.00 ea 2,500.00 2,500

C1030.550 - Postal Boxes & Chutes 2,500





C10 - INTERIOR CONSTRUCTIONC1030 - Building Specialties

C1030.700 - Toilet, Bath & Laundry Accessories360 Toilet 122.00 ea 1,000.00 122,000

361 Urinal Screen 26.00 ea 650.00 16,900

362 SS Toilet Tissue Dispenser - Double Roll Surface Mtd 122.00 ea 150.00 18,300

363 Toilet Seat Cover 122.00 ea 250.00 30,500

364 Mirror with Stainless Steel Frame 24"x36" 94.00 ea 150.00 14,100

365 Stainless Steel Towel Dispenser + Waste Receptacle - Surface Mtd

70.00 ea 200.00 14,000

366 Locker room shower 4.00 ea 2,310.00 9,240

367 Toilet Partitions - Standard Floor Mounted - ADA 28.00 ea 2,000.00 56,000

368 Liquid Soap Dispenser - Surface Mtd 70.00 ea 70.00 4,900

369 Toilet Partitions - Standard Floor Mounted 50.00 ea 1,600.00 80,000

370 Grab Bar - 36" 140.00 ea 100.00 14,000

371 Coat Hook 122.00 ea 45.00 5,490

372 Locker room shower curtain Rod and Curtain 4.00 ea 150.00 600

C1030.700 - Toilet, Bath & Laundry Accessories 386,030C1030.850 - Misc. Specialties

373 Salvage Allowance for Clock Works, linear ceramic mural, wood frieze, proscenium, cast stone frieze, Collumb clockworks

1.00 allw 1,000,000.00 1,000,000

374 Reduce Salvage Allowance for Clock Works, linear ceramic mural, wood frieze, proscenium, cast stone frieze, Collumb clockworks

(1.00) allw 500,000.00 (500,000)

375 Salvage and turn clock over to Town 1.00 ea (20,000.00) (20,000)

376 Miscellaneous Metals - Allowance 447,870.00 sf 1.75 785,027

377 Stainless Steel Column Wraps 174.00 vlf 850.00 147,900

378 Ornamental Metals 437,190.00 sf 2.00 874,380

379 Glass Railings at Ornamental Stair 380.00 lf 650.00 247,000

380 Glass Railings at Roof Decks 120.00 lf 650.00 78,000

381 Reduce Glass Railing by 25% 1.00 ea (84,718.00) (84,718)

382 Interior Expansion Joint Covers 650.00 lf 150.00 97,500

383 Rough Blocking; Temporary Exterior Wall 26,000.00 sf 0.30 7,800

384 Rough Blocking; Generic Walls 5,000.00 sf 0.30 1,500

385 Rough Blocking; Athletic Toilet Facility 2,700.00 sf 0.30 810

386 Interior Blocking for Specialties, FFE Items, Casework 424,457.00 sf 0.31 132,898

387 Solid Surface Window Stools 500.00 sf 95.00 47,500

388 Photo Luminescent Paint / Markings for Egress Stairs 1.00 allw 25,000.00 25,000

C1030.850 - Misc. Specialties 2,840,597





C10 - INTERIOR CONSTRUCTIONC1030 - Building Specialties

C3010.450 - Acoustical Wall Treatment389 Ecophon Acoustical Wall Panels: Core Learning 5,100.00 sf 105.00 535,500

390 Tectum Wall Panels w/ Wood Trim: Gym, Alt PE, Black Box, Performing Arts

27,860.00 sf 25.00 696,500

391 Perforated Wood Acoustical Wall Panels: Auditorium 8,824.00 sf 125.00 1,103,000

392 Pegboard Acoustical Wall Panels: Wood Shop/Maker Space

1,500.00 sf 75.00 112,500

393 Perforated Wood Acoustical Wall Panels: Discourse Lab - 50% of Wall Area

1,860.00 sf 125.00 232,500

394 Reduce Acoustic Wall Treatments 1.00 ea (72,891.00) (72,891)

C3010.450 - Acoustical Wall Treatment 2,607,109D4030.100 - Fire Extinguishers & Cabinets

395 Fire Extinguishers & Cabinet 125.00 ea 350.00 43,750

D4030.100 - Fire Extinguishers & Cabinets 43,750E1090.300 - Athletic & Recreation Equipment

396 Ballet Barres 1.00 ls 1,500.00 1,500

E1090.300 - Athletic & Recreation Equipment 1,500E2010.800 - Window Treatments

397 Cubicle Curtain & Track Allowance 1.00 ls 5,000.00 5,000

E2010.800 - Window Treatments 5,000C1030 - Building Specialties 7,595,981

C10 - INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION 16,626,046C20 - STAIRS

C2010 - Stair ConstructionC1010.120 - Screens & Railings

398 Ornamental Railings 1,050.00 lf 650.00 682,500

C1010.120 - Screens & Railings 682,500C2010.400 - Metal Stairs

399 Metal Pan Stair And Stringers, Fill/ Place/ Finish Concrete

528.00 riser 875.00 462,000

C2010.400 - Metal Stairs 462,000C2030.600 - Stair Railings

400 Steel Pipe Railing at Wall 1,905.00 lf 285.00 542,925

Unit is Linear Feet (lf) of Tread and Riser.

C2030.600 - Stair Railings 542,925C3020.100 - Tile Flooring

401 Porcelain Tile Treads - Main Entry Stair 1.00 ls 10,000.00 10,000

C3020.100 - Tile Flooring 10,000C2010 - Stair Construction 1,697,425





C20 - STAIRSC2030 - Stair Finishes

C2030.375 - Resilient Stair Finishes402 RBR - Rubber Stair & Ramp Treads, Risers, Landings 5,323.00 sf 10.00 53,230

C2030.375 - Resilient Stair Finishes 53,230C3010.550 - Interior Wall Painting

403 Paint Stair Structure/Pans/Rails 29.00 flts 1,650.00 47,850

C3010.550 - Interior Wall Painting 47,850C3020.100 - Tile Flooring

404 PCT - Porcelain Stair Treads at Main Entry Stair 453.00 sf 26.00 11,778

C3020.100 - Tile Flooring 11,778C2030 - Stair Finishes 112,858

C20 - STAIRS 1,810,283C30 - INTERIOR FINISHES

C3010 - Wall FinishesC1030.250 - Wall & Corner Guards

405 WR - Resin Composite Panels - Cafeteria - eq Parklex P500 or Prodema Prolinga

1,922.00 sf 85.00 163,370

406 WR - Resin Composite Panels - 2nd Floor Lobby - eq Parklex P500 or Prodema Prolinga

1,000.00 sf 85.00 85,000

C1030.250 - Wall & Corner Guards 248,370C3010.100 - Wall Paneling

407 Hardwood Wall Paneling to 10' School Committee Room 1,431.00 sf 55.00 78,705

C3010.100 - Wall Paneling 78,705C3010.300 - Tile Wall Finishes

408 Delete Wood Paneling 1.00 ea (119,984.00) (119,984)

409 Ceramic Wall Tile - 4" x 4", Thinset 28,903.00 sf 22.00 635,866

410 Ceramic Wall Tile - Premium for Design/Pattern at Cafeteria

1,000.00 sf 10.00 10,000

411 Ceramic Wall Tile - 4" x 4", Thinset - Corridor Walls 66,863.00 sf 22.00 1,470,986

C3010.300 - Tile Wall Finishes 1,996,868C3010.450 - Acoustical Wall Treatment

412 Acoustical Treatment 21,200.00 sf 30.00 636,000

C3010.450 - Acoustical Wall Treatment 636,000C3010.550 - Interior Wall Painting

413 Paint Steel Stairs & Railings - ls - -

414 Paint - CMU Walls, Epoxy 60,264.00 sf 1.25 75,330

415 Paint - Gyp Walls, Latex 537,329.00 sf 0.85 456,730

416 Paint Catwalks / Catwalk Railings - NIC galvanized - sf - -

C3010.550 - Interior Wall Painting 532,060





C30 - INTERIOR FINISHESC3010 - Wall Finishes

C3010.650 - Wall Trim & Decoration417 Wood Wainscot - NIC none found - ea - -

C3010.650 - Wall Trim & Decoration -C3010 - Wall Finishes 3,492,003

C3020 - Floor FinishesB1010.020 - Floor Structural Frame

418 AFC-1 - Polished Dyed Concrete Floor, 3/8" Thick Toppping

32,012.00 sf 30.00 960,360

B1010.020 - Floor Structural Frame 960,360C3020.100 - Tile Flooring

419 PCT - Porcelain Base 2,404.00 lf 16.50 39,666

420 PCT - Porcelain Floor Tile 28,348.00 sf 16.50 467,742

C3020.100 - Tile Flooring 507,408C3020.200 - Wood Flooring

421 STAGEFlng - Hardboard Stage Flooring on Resilient Channels

5,103.00 sf 30.00 153,090

422 WAF - Wood Strip Sports Flooring in Gymnasium 16,126.00 sf 20.00 322,520

C3020.200 - Wood Flooring 475,610C3020.350 - Resilient Flooring

423 RF - Linoleum Tile, High-RH Adhesive 276,420.00 sf 8.00 2,211,360

424 RB - Rubber Base 57,554.00 lf 2.75 158,274

425 VCB - Vented Rubber Base 940.00 lf 3.50 3,290

C3020.350 - Resilient Flooring 2,372,924C3020.400 - Carpet Flooring

426 CPT - Carpet, Broadloom, Discourse Lab 63.00 sy 50.00 3,150

427 CPT - Carpet, Broadloom, Auditorium Aisle 563.00 sy 50.00 28,150

428 CPT - Carpet Tile w Tabs (eq Flexloc System): CRI Green Label Carpet

3,137.00 sy 42.00 131,754

C3020.400 - Carpet Flooring 163,054C3020.500 - Floor Treatments

429 EXP-C - Sealed Concrete Floor 16,731.00 sf 0.75 12,548

C3020.500 - Floor Treatments 12,548C3020.700 - Misc. Flooring

430 RSF - Resinous Floor Base 4,129.00 lf 20.00 82,580

431 RAF - Poured Rubber Sports Flooring - Alt P.E. Room 11,685.00 sf 13.50 157,748

432 RSF - Resinous Floor 13,814.00 sf 12.00 165,768

C3020.700 - Misc. Flooring 406,096





C30 - INTERIOR FINISHESC3020 - Floor Finishes

F1020.100 - Special Purpose Rooms433 IFT - Rubber Tile Interlocking Sports Floor 3,040.00 sf 12.00 36,480

434 WR Panels - Forum Seating Floating Floor & Risers: Eq to HyTek by Parlex, 4 widths

1,530.00 sf 85.00 130,050

F1020.100 - Special Purpose Rooms 166,530C3020 - Floor Finishes 5,064,529

C3030 - Ceiling FinishesC3030.000 - Ceiling Finishes

435 Bulkheads: Balcony, Open To Below, etc. 8,782.00 sf 24.00 210,768

436 Drywall Ceilings & Soffits - 10% of Balance Area 16,950.00 sf 9.00 152,550

C3030.000 - Ceiling Finishes 363,318C3030.300 - Acoustical Ceiling Treatment

437 ACT/Grid - BOH 12,846.00 sf 5.50 70,653

438 ACT/Grid - Staff/Student 127,795.00 sf 6.50 830,668

439 ACT/Grid - Other Areas 105,850.00 sf 6.00 635,100

440 K-13 Spray Applied Insulation 95,420.00 sf 6.50 620,230

441 Tectum Ceilings Panels - Stadium Toilet Building 1,310.00 sf 28.00 36,680

442 Specialty Ceilings at Auditorium 9,000.00 sf 50.00 450,000

443 ACC Cloud Ceilings w/ Felted Baffles/Axiom Trim - 25% of Listed Area

12,880.00 sf 45.00 579,600

444 Tectum Ceilings Panels - Locker Rooms 6,600.00 sf 28.00 184,800

445 Acoustical Reflector Clouds: Stage, Band, Chorus Allowance

1.00 ls 200,000.00 200,000

446 ACT/Grid - Special Purpose Areas 4,650.00 sf 7.50 34,875

447 Specialty Ceilings: Metal, Wood Blade, etc - 5% of Balance Area Allowance

8,476.00 sf 55.00 466,180

448 Change Science and FACS ceilign to ACT 1.00 ea (544,321.00) (544,321)

C3030.300 - Acoustical Ceiling Treatment 3,564,465C3030.350 - Interior Ceiling Painting

449 Paint Drywall Soffits 25,735.00 sf 1.00 25,735

450 Paint Exposed Steel Structure and Deck 95,420.00 sf 1.25 119,275

C3030.350 - Interior Ceiling Painting 145,010C3030 - Ceiling Finishes 4,072,793

C30 - INTERIOR FINISHES 12,629,324D10 - CONVEYING

D1010 - Elevators & LiftsD1010.200 - Hydraulic Passenger Elevators

451 Hydraulic Elevator, Pedestrian/ Service Combination (1 Elevator), Including Cab Finishes

3.00 stops 55,000.00 165,000





D10 - CONVEYINGD1010 - Elevators & Lifts

D1010.200 - Hydraulic Passenger Elevators452 Hydraulic Elevator, Pedestrian (2 Elevators), Including

Cab Finishes10.00 stops 43,000.00 430,000

D1010.200 - Hydraulic Passenger Elevators 595,000D1010 - Elevators & Lifts 595,000

D10 - CONVEYING 595,000D20 - PLUMBING

D2000 - Plumbing Common Work RequirementsD2000.000 - Plumbing Common Work Requirements

453 Project management 1.00 ls 20,000.00 20,000

454 Demolition/cut, drop & make safe/square foot 619,390.00 sf 0.10 61,939

455 General requirements/square foot 619,390.00 sf 0.83 510,997

456 Commissioning support 1.00 ls 25,000.00 25,000

457 Reconciliation Adjustment (1.00) ls 2,887,500.00 (2,887,500)

D2000.000 - Plumbing Common Work Requirements (2,269,564)D2000 - Plumbing Common Work Requirements (2,269,564)

D2001 - Plumbing Temporary Services for PhasingD2001.000 - Plumbing Temporary Services for Phasing

458 Temporary gas service - Install in Ph-1 1.00 ea 50,000.00 50,000

Dwg. #P1-1

459 Temporary gas service - Demo in Ph-3 1.00 ea 7,500.00 7,500

Dwg. #P1-1

460 Temporary sanitary & vent - Install in Ph-1 1.00 ls 25,000.00 25,000

Dwg. #P1-1

461 Temporary sanitary & vent - Demo in Ph-3 1.00 ls 3,000.00 3,000

Dwg. #P1-1

462 Temporary water service - Install in Ph-1 1.00 ls 30,000.00 30,000

Dwg. #P1-1

463 Temporary water service - Demo in Ph-3 1.00 ls 5,000.00 5,000

Dwg. #P1-1

464 Temporary backflow preventer/3" - Install in Ph-1 1.00 ls 4,500.00 4,500

Dwg. #P1-1

465 Temporary backflow preventer/3" - Demo in Ph-3 1.00 ls 1,396.72 1,397

Dwg. #P1-1

D2001.000 - Plumbing Temporary Services for Phasing 126,397D2001 - Plumbing Temporary Services for Phasing 126,397





D20 - PLUMBINGD2003 - Insulation/Plumbing (INS)

D2003.500 - Insulation/Plumbing - Piping (INS)466 INS - Armaflex/Copper Pipe - Trap primer feeds UG 1,000.00 lf 7.54 7,538

467 INS - Fiberglass/Cast Iron Pipe - Overflow RL/horiz. & vert.

10,500.00 lf 12.97 136,164

468 INS - Fiberglass/Cast Iron Pipe - Primary RL/horiz. & vert.

10,800.00 lf 12.97 140,054

469 INS - Fiberglass/Copper Pipe - Non-potable water 18,375.00 lf 9.29 170,620

470 INS - Fiberglass/Copper Pipe - Domestic water 24,680.00 lf 9.29 229,165

471 INS - Fiberglass/Copper Pipe - Tempered water 450.00 lf 9.06 4,078

D2003.500 - Insulation/Plumbing - Piping (INS) 687,619D2003 - Insulation/Plumbing (INS) 687,619

D2010 - Plumbing FixturesD2010.000 - Plumbing Fixtures

472 Water closet/wall mnt/carrier/sensor FV/1.1 GPF 69.00 ea 1,769.44 122,091

473 Water closet/wall mnt/carrier/sensor FV/1.1 GPF/ADA 67.00 ea 1,769.44 118,552

474 Urinal/wall mount/carrier/sensor FV/Ultra low flow 14.00 ea 1,340.08 18,761

475 Urinal/wall mount/carrier/sensor FV/Ultra low flow/ADA 16.00 ea 1,340.08 21,441

476 Lavatory/wall hung/carrier/g-neck sensor faucet/low flow/ADA

119.00 ea 1,568.14 186,609

477 Sink/1-bowl/miscelaneous/ADA 24.00 ea 1,266.84 30,404

478 Faucet, trap & stops/integral science sink/gooseneck 477.00 ea 431.30 205,730

479 Faucet, trap & stops/integral science sink/gooseneck/ADA

48.00 ea 499.36 23,969

480 Mop sink/floor mount - 24"x24" 10.00 ea 1,370.90 13,709

481 Emergency shower/eye wash/cabinet type 18.00 ea 2,703.44 48,662

482 Valve box/ice machine 3.00 ea 244.18 733

483 Valve box/refrigerator 2.00 ea 244.18 488

484 - Rough-ins/Fixtures 566.00 ea 157.24 88,998

485 Hose bibbs/interior 32.00 ea 224.18 7,174

486 Wall hydrants/encased/freezeproof/exterior - WH's 15.00 ea 757.24 11,359

487 Service sink/cast iron/wall mount/std. faucet 2.00 ea 1,119.84 2,240

488 Sink/Kitchen/Rough-in only/Provided by KES 6.00 ea 132.24 793

489 Sink/1-bowl/Art room 159.00 ea 1,402.02 222,921

490 Sink/1-bowl/ADA/Art room 17.00 ea 1,475.08 25,076

491 - Art room sink solids interceptor 176.00 ea 759.48 133,668

492 Drinking fountain/bottle fill/bi-level/ADA 16.00 ea 2,636.44 42,183

493 Valve box/coffee maker 14.00 ea 244.18 3,419

494 Shower stall/36x36 fiberglass/valve & access. 2.00 ea 2,800.68 5,601

495 Shower stall/36x36 fiberglass/valve & access./ADA 2.00 ea 3,224.04 6,448





D20 - PLUMBINGD2010 - Plumbing Fixtures

D2010.000 - Plumbing Fixtures496 Sink/1-bowl/Culinary 15.00 ea 1,198.78 17,982

497 Sink/1-bowl/ADA/Culinary 3.00 ea 1,266.84 3,801

498 Water closet/wall mnt/carrier/sensor FV/1.1 GPF/ADA - Preschool

7.00 ea 1,769.44 12,386

499 - Mixing valve/emergency shower/eye wash 18.00 ea 984.30 17,717

500 Valve & drain box/washing machine 3.00 ea 360.30 1,081

501 - Offload & distribution/Fixtures 566.00 ea 132.24 74,848

D2010.000 - Plumbing Fixtures 1,468,845D2010 - Plumbing Fixtures 1,468,845

D2020 - Domestic Water DistributionD2020.000 - Domestic Water Heaters

502 Water heater/indirect fed (PVI)/ ? gpm - Kitchen & showers

2.00 ea 16,167.92 32,336

503 Water heater/indirect fed (PVI)/ ? gpm - Science wing 1.00 ea 13,672.44 13,672

504 Water heaters/electric/ ? gals. (AO Smith DSE) - Bathrooms

5.00 ea 9,449.96 47,250

505 Water heaters/electric/POS - Remote fixtures 3.00 ea 696.60 2,090

506 Water heater/electric/ ? gals. - Concession bldg. 1.00 ea 1,776.96 1,777

507 Heat exchanger/brazed plate/ ? gpm - Geothermal waste heat

2.00 ea 11,803.20 23,606

508 - Offload & rigging/Water heaters & HX's 14.00 ea 628.96 8,805

509 - Start up/Water heaters 12.00 ea 157.24 1,887

510 - Support steel/Water heaters 5.00 ea 380.60 1,903

511 - Drain pans & accessories/Water heaters 5.00 ea 646.72 3,234

D2020.000 - Domestic Water Heaters 136,560D2020.200 - Domestic Water Equipment

512 Water meter w/remote readout/entrance/3" - Concession

1.00 ea 2,175.72 2,176

513 Water meter w/remote readout/entrance/4" - Back up 1.00 ea 2,387.84 2,388

514 Water meter w/remote readout/entrance/6" - Primary 1.00 ea 2,812.08 2,812

515 Recirculation pump/bronze - Primary 1.00 ea 842.48 842

516 Expansion tank/ASME/potable - Primary 1.00 ea 1,843.48 1,843

517 Thermostatic mixing valve - Primary 1.00 ea 2,846.72 2,847

518 Thermostatic mixing valve - Kitchen 140F 1.00 ea 2,531.72 2,532

519 Thermostatic mixing valve - Tempered water 1.00 ea 1,428.66 1,429

520 Recirculation pump/bronze - Tempered water 1.00 ea 788.48 788

521 Expansion tank/ASME/potable - Tempered water 1.00 ea 1,772.48 1,772

522 Domestic hot water booster - Kitchen 1.00 ea 15,557.92 15,558

523 Water sub-meter - Kitchen 1.00 ea 871.40 871





D20 - PLUMBINGD2020 - Domestic Water Distribution

D2020.200 - Domestic Water Equipment524 Water sub-meter - Domestic HW 1.00 ea 1,273.69 1,274

525 Shock absorbers/61 to 113 FU's/#400 16.00 ea 956.67 15,307




529 Trap primer/#PT-4/electronic/4 outlet 18.00 ea 736.24 13,252

530 Backflow preventer/Tempered water 2.00 ea 378.57 757

531 Backflow preventer/Boiler make-up 1.00 ea 221.12 221

532 Backflow preventers/6" - RPZ-BFP - Primary 1.00 ea 2,461.20 2,461

533 Backflow preventers/4" - RPZ-BFP - Back up 1.00 ea 2,062.84 2,063

534 Backflow preventers/3" - RPZ-BFP - Concession 1.00 ea 1,896.72 1,897

D2020.200 - Domestic Water Equipment 96,828D2020.500 - Domestic Water Piping

535 Type L Copper Pipe & Ftgs/95-5 Solder - Tempered water

450.00 lf 25.38 11,420

536 Type L Copper Pipe & Ftgs/95-5 Solder - Non-Potable water

18,375.00 lf 29.00 532,950

537 Type L Copper Pipe & Ftgs/95-5 Solder - Domestic water 24,680.00 lf 33.53 827,437

538 Type K Soft Copper Pipe & Ftgs/95-5 Solder - Trap primer feed U/G

1,000.00 lf 16.39 16,394

539 Ductile Iron Pipe & Ftgs - Dom. water entrance 6" U/G Primary

20.00 lf 479.21 9,584

540 Ductile Iron Pipe & Ftgs - Dom. water entrance 3" U/G Concession

20.00 lf 323.89 6,478

541 Ductile Iron Pipe & Ftgs - Dom. water entrance 4" U/G Back up

20.00 lf 365.70 7,314

542 - Hangers & clamps/Domestic water 43,505.00 lf 2.56 111,282

543 - Clean & test system/Domestic water 3.00 ea 3,423.76 10,271

544 - Fill & vent system/Domestic water 3.00 ea 3,273.76 9,821

D2020.500 - Domestic Water Piping 1,542,952D2020 - Domestic Water Distribution 1,776,340

D2030 - Sanitary WasteD2030.200 - Sanitary Waste & Vent Equipment

545 Wall cleanouts 20.00 ea 201.24 4,025

546 Floor cleanouts/heavy duty 9.00 ea 373.24 3,359

547 Floor cleanouts 42.00 ea 301.24 12,652

548 Floor sinks - Kitchen 6.00 ea 1,038.42 6,231

549 Floor drains/heavy duty 17.00 ea 371.24 6,311

550 Floor drains 34.00 ea 310.24 10,548





D20 - PLUMBINGD2030 - Sanitary Waste

D2030.200 - Sanitary Waste & Vent Equipment551 Grease Interceptor 100 Pound - Culinary allowance 1.00 ea 16,552.92 16,553

552 Grease Interceptor 150 Pound - Kitchen allowance 1.00 ea 23,133.40 23,133

553 Elevator sump pump/Oil Minder 2.00 ea 2,498.96 4,998

554 Floor sinks - Culinary 4.00 ea 1,038.42 4,154

555 Shower drains/2" 4.00 ea 235.24 941

556 - Offload & rigging/Grease interceptors 2.00 ea 1,157.92 2,316

557 - Offload & rigging/Sump pumps 2.00 ea 264.48 529

558 - Start up/Sump pumps 2.00 ea 33.06 66

D2030.200 - Sanitary Waste & Vent Equipment 95,816D2030.500 - Sanitary Waste & Vent Piping

559 DWV Copper Pipe & Ftgs/95-5 Solder - Indirect waste 100.00 lf 54.08 5,408

560 Sch 40 Galv Steel Pipe & Ftgs/T&C - Sump pump discharge

120.00 lf 48.41 5,809

561 SVC Wt B&S C.I. Pipe & Ftgs/Gasket - Sanitary W&V UG 4,000.00 lf 71.35 285,403

562 SVC Wt B&S C.I. Pipe & Ftgs/Gasket - Grease W&V UG 800.00 lf 58.44 46,749

563 No-Hub C.I. Pipe & Ftgs/Clamp - Sanitary W&V AG 18,510.00 lf 66.54 1,231,617

564 No-Hub C.I. Pipe & Ftgs/Clamp - Grease W&V AG 400.00 lf 50.42 20,169

565 - Hangers & clamps/San. W&V 19,130.00 lf 3.32 63,558

566 - Clean & test system/San. W&V 2.00 ea 8,434.40 16,869

D2030.500 - Sanitary Waste & Vent Piping 1,675,580D2030 - Sanitary Waste 1,771,395

D2040 - Storm Drainage SystemD2040.200 - Storm Drainage Equipment

567 Wall Cleanouts/RL 16.00 ea 131.12 2,098

568 Floor Cleanouts/RL/heavy duty 4.00 ea 353.24 1,413

569 Floor Cleanouts/RL 4.00 ea 320.24 1,281

570 Downspots/overflow RL 16.00 ea 899.22 14,388

571 Roof Drains/Overflow RL 65.00 ea 718.97 46,733

572 Roof Drains/Primary RL 70.00 ea 402.97 28,208

D2040.200 - Storm Drainage Equipment 94,120D2040.500 - Storm Drainage Piping

573 SVC Wt B&S C.I. Pipe & Ftgs/Gasket - RL UG 1,750.00 lf 86.44 151,264

574 No-Hub C.I. Pipe & Ftgs/Clamp - RL AG 13,500.00 lf 74.83 1,010,222

575 - Hangers & clamps/Rainleader 13,500.00 lf 3.32 44,852

576 - Clean & test system/Rainleader 1.00 ea 4,481.68 4,482

D2040.500 - Storm Drainage Piping 1,210,820





D20 - PLUMBINGD2040 - Storm Drainage System 1,304,941

D2050 - Compressed Air System (Gen. Services)D2050.200 - Compressed Air Equipment

577 Air compressor/duplex w/dryer/ ? hp/ ? scfm - Wood shop

1.00 ea 27,907.92 27,908

578 - Line filter/Comp. air - Wood shop 1.00 ea 682.24 682

579 Filter/regulator/psi gauge/Comp. air 24.00 ea 357.24 8,574

580 Quick disconnects/Comp. air 24.00 ea 51.06 1,225

581 Hose reel/1/2" hose by 50'L/Comp. air 2.00 ea 755.60 1,511

D2050.200 - Compressed Air Equipment 39,901D2050.500 - Compressed Air Piping

582 Sch 40 Black Steel (Smls) Pipe & Ftgs (T&C) - Comp. air 450.00 lf 43.44 19,549

583 - Hangers & clamps/Comp. air piping 450.00 lf 1.79 807

584 - Clean & test system/Comp. air piping 1.00 ea 578.96 579

D2050.500 - Compressed Air Piping 20,935D2050 - Compressed Air System (Gen. Services) 60,835

D2060 - Natural/LP Gas SystemD2060.200 - Natural/LP Gas Equipment

585 Gas turret/bench or desk mount/double 253.00 ea 335.12 84,785

586 Gas turret/bench or desk mount/single 18.00 ea 222.28 4,001

587 Emer. gas shut off cabinet w/1-1/2" ball valve 18.00 ea 1,377.96 24,803

D2060.200 - Natural/LP Gas Equipment 113,590D2060.500 - Natural/LP Gas Piping

588 Sch 40 Black Steel (CW) Pipe & Ftgs/T&C - Gas piping 5,300.00 lf 30.43 161,298

589 Sch 40 Black Steel (ERW) Pipe & Ftgs/Weld - Gas piping 750.00 lf 99.31 74,484

590 - Paint exposed piping/Gas piping 200.00 lf 21.87 4,374

591 - Hangers & clamps/Gas piping 6,050.00 lf 2.56 15,475

592 - Flex connector/Kitchen equipment 6.00 ea 152.09 913

593 - Clean & test system/Gas piping 1.00 ea 5,589.60 5,590

594 - Flex connector/Culinary equipment 6.00 ea 152.09 913

D2060.500 - Natural/LP Gas Piping 263,046D2060 - Natural/LP Gas System 376,636

D2077 - Acid Neutrilization SystemD2077.200 - Acid Neutralization Equipment

595 Acid waste/floor cleanouts/heavy duty 1.00 ea 435.24 435

596 Acid waste/floor drain/heavy duty 1.00 ea 428.24 428

597 Acid neutrilization system w/monitor/ ? gal.tank 1.00 ea 63,026.68 63,027

598 - Offload & rigging/AW equipment 1.00 ea 2,365.84 2,366





D20 - PLUMBINGD2077 - Acid Neutrilization System

D2077.200 - Acid Neutralization Equipment599 - Start up/AW equipment 1.00 ea 2,365.84 2,366

D2077.200 - Acid Neutralization Equipment 68,622D2077.500 - Acid Neutralization Piping

600 Sch 40 Polypro Fuseal/AW Pipe & Ftgs AG 15,750.00 lf 76.90 1,211,213

601 - Hangers & clamps/AW piping 15,750.00 lf 2.56 40,287

602 - Clean & test system/AW piping 1.00 ea 8,434.40 8,434

D2077.500 - Acid Neutralization Piping 1,259,934D2077 - Acid Neutrilization System 1,328,556

D20 - PLUMBING 6,632,000D30 - HVAC

D3020 - Heating Systems & EquipmentD3020.420 - Heating Hot Water System Piping

603 Type L Copper Pipe & Fittings / 95-5 Solder Joints / 3/4" 38,520.00 lf 34.47 1,327,800

Unit Prices - 201 8-1119

604 Type L Copper Pipe & Fittings / 95-5 Solder Joints / 2" 10,508.00 lf 51.23 538,290


605 Sch40 Smls Blk Steel Pipe & Fittings / HBF / Butt Weld Jts / 8"

400.00 lf 192.37 76,949

Unit Prices - 2018- 1119

606 Sch 40 Black Steel Pipe & Fittings / HBF / Butt Weld Joints / 12"

600.00 lf 275.93 165,560


607 Piping Hookup @ AHU Coil - 2" 20.00 ea 8,771.48 175,430

Unit Prices - 201 8 - 1119 - 100% MCA (Adjust Labor Accordingly )

608 Piping Hookup @ End Suct Pump - 8" 12.00 ea 17,305.00 207,660

Unit Prices - 2018-1119 - End Suction Pump - TDV / SD - 100% MCA (Adjust Labor Accordingly)

609 Piping Hookup @ Heat Exchanger - HHW / 8" 3.00 ea 28,894.80 86,684

Unit Prices - 2018- 1119 - 100% MCA (Adjust Labor Accordingly)

D3020.420 - Heating Hot Water System Piping 2,578,373D3020.430 - Heating Hot Water System Equipment

610 Heating Hot Water Pump 3.00 ea 10,797.76 32,393

611 Loop circulation system Pump 3.00 ea 18,917.76 56,753

612 Heat Exchanger - 3.00 ea 14,931.84 44,796

613 Air Separator 1.00 ea 1,491.92 1,492

614 Expansion Tank 1.00 ea 4,238.88 4,239





D30 - HVACD3020 - Heating Systems & Equipment

D3020.430 - Heating Hot Water System Equipment615 Chemical Bypass Feeder 1.00 ea 2,635.84 2,636

616 Radiant Floor 6,547.00 sf 5.80 37,973

D3020.430 - Heating Hot Water System Equipment 180,281D3040.200 - Insulation - Piping Systems

617 Heating Hot Water Insulation - Fiberglass / ASJ 49,758.00 lf 13.92 692,631

618 Chilled Water Insulation - Fiberglass / ASJ 49,758.00 lf 13.92 692,631

D3040.200 - Insulation - Piping Systems 1,385,263D3020 - Heating Systems & Equipment 4,143,917

D3030 - Cooling Systems & EquipmentD3030.120 - Chilled Water System Piping

619 Type L Copper Pipe & Fittings / 95-5 Solder Joints / 3/4" 38,250.00 lf 34.47 1,318,493


620 Type L Copper Pipe & Fittings / 95-5 Solder Joints / 2" 10,508.00 lf 51.23 538,290


621 Sch40 Smls Blk Steel Pipe & Fittings / HBF / Butt Weld Jts / 8"

400.00 lf 192.37 76,949


622 Sch 40 Black Steel Pipe & Fittings / HBF / Butt Weld Joints / 12"

600.00 lf 275.93 165,560


623 Piping Hookup @ AHU Coil - 2" 20.00 ea 8,771.48 175,430


624 Piping Hookup @ End Suct Pump - 10" 4.00 ea 24,315.56 97,262

Unit Prices - 2018-1119 - End Suction Pump - TDV / SD - 100% MCA (Adjust Labor Accordingly)

625 Piping Hookup @ Chiller - 12" 7.00 ea 38,142.04 266,994


626 Piping Hookup @ Expansion Tank - 3/4" 7.00 ea 2,734.72 19,143


627 Piping Hookup @ Chem Feed Tank - 1-1/4" 1.00 ea 1,691.64 1,692


D3030.120 - Chilled Water System Piping 2,659,813D3030.130 - Chilled Water System Equipment

628 Chilled Water Pump 3.00 ea 14,848.00 44,544

629 Chiller/heater module 7.00 ea 53,063.68 371,446

630 Air Separator 1.00 ea 1,491.92 1,492





D30 - HVACD3030 - Cooling Systems & Equipment

D3030.130 - Chilled Water System Equipment631 Expansion Tank 1.00 ea 4,238.88 4,239

632 Chemical Glycol 1.00 ls 27,750.00 27,750

D3030.130 - Chilled Water System Equipment 449,471D3030.230 - Condenser Water System Equipment

633 Condenser Water Pump 3.00 ea 17,400.00 52,200

D3030.230 - Condenser Water System Equipment 52,200D3030 - Cooling Systems & Equipment 3,161,483

D3040 - Air Distribution Systems & EquipmentD3040.100 - Ductwork

634 Galvanized Ductwork 350,000.00 lb 10.44 3,654,000

635 Black Iron Ductwork 12,000.00 lb 11.60 139,200

636 Flexible Duct Preinsulated 6,400.00 lf 19.70 126,059

Means Data 201 8 - 10" Diameter / Insulated / 1"

637 Fire Dampers 30.00 ea 766.92 23,008

638 Fire / Smoke Dampers 25.00 ea 819.12 20,478

639 Motorized Damper - Small / Furnish by ATC / Install Only

24.00 ea 505.92 12,142

640 Motorized Damper - Large / Furnish by ATC / Install Only

14.00 ea 1,011.84 14,166

D3040.100 - Ductwork 3,989,052D3040.210 - Insulation - Ductwork Systems

641 Ductwork - Concealed / Fiberglass Wrap / SA 250,000.00 sf 5.80 1,450,000

642 Ductwork - Concealed / Fiberglass Wrap / RA (Riser Only)

150,000.00 sf 5.80 870,000

643 Ductwork - Kitchen Exhaust - Firemaster 8,000.00 sf 16.24 129,920

D3040.210 - Insulation - Ductwork Systems 2,449,920D3050.300 - Air Distribution Equipment

644 Rooftop units RTU-1 thur RTU-10 10.00 ea 104,637.28 1,046,373

645 Heat recovery units HRU-1-thru HRU-5 5.00 ea 47,917.76 239,589

646 VRF System VRF-1 Thru VRF-4/ ERU-1 Thru ERU-5 4.00 ea 45,091.84 180,367

647 Heating ventilation system HV-1 1.00 ea 38,131.84 38,132

648 Dust Collector 1.00 ea 25,223.68 25,224

649 Kitchen hoods 3.00 ea 11,883.68 35,651

650 Roof fans 10.00 ea 3,310.88 33,109

651 Splitz systems 3.00 ea 5,503.68 16,511

652 Range hoods 15.00 ea 4,491.84 67,378

653 Cabinet unit heaters 18.00 ea 1,997.84 35,961





D30 - HVACD3040 - Air Distribution Systems & Equipment

D3050.300 - Air Distribution Equipment654 Lab hood exhaust and fan 4.00 ea 3,911.84 15,647

655 VRF System Refrigerant and piping 1.00 ls 23,200.00 23,200

656 VAV Box 262.00 ea 957.27 250,805

657 VAV Box exhaust 190.00 ea 957.27 181,882

658 Fan Coil Units w/Chw Coil - (.5 to 2 Ton) 83.00 rt 1,538.32 127,681

659 Chilled Beams 380.00 rt 2,071.92 787,330

660 16'-0" Dest-fans 9.00 rt 5,166.88 46,502

661 Louvers 12.00 ea 3,099.84 37,198

662 Kiln hood and fan 1.00 ea 14,931.84 14,932

D3050.300 - Air Distribution Equipment 3,203,470D3050.390 - Air Devices

663 Ceiling Diffuser 858.00 ea 75.40 64,693

664 Linear Slot Diffuser - 4'-0" 180.00 ea 487.23 87,701

665 Return Register 450.00 ea 151.81 68,315

666 Exhaust Register 280.00 ea 151.81 42,507

D3050.390 - Air Devices 263,217D3040 - Air Distribution Systems & Equipment 9,905,660

D3070 - Controls & InstrumentationD3070.000 - Controls & Instrumentation

667 Building Management System / DDC 1.00 ls 1,998,000.00 1,998,000

D3070.000 - Controls & Instrumentation 1,998,000D3070 - Controls & Instrumentation 1,998,000

D3080 - System Test & BalanceD3080.000 - System Test and Balance

668 Testing Adjusting and Balancing 1.00 ls 29,000.00 29,000

D3080.000 - System Test and Balance 29,000D3080 - System Test & Balance 29,000

D3090 - Misc HVAC SystemsD3090.300 - Misc Materials and Methods

669 Coordination Drawings, Submittals, As-Builts 50.00 md 1,011.84 50,592

670 Temporary Filter Changes 1.00 ls 5,220.00 5,220

671 Temporary Heat / Cooling 1.00 ls 11,600.00 11,600

672 Miscellaneous Demolition - Cut and safe 30.00 md 1,011.84 30,355

673 Vibration / Seismic Equipment Restraints 1.00 ls 5,800.00 5,800

674 Pipe, Valve & Equipment ID 1.00 ls 9,280.00 9,280

675 Geothermal wells and vault with piping loop 1.00 ls 5,550,000.00 5,550,000





D30 - HVACD3090 - Misc HVAC Systems

D3090.300 - Misc Materials and Methods676 Sleeveing & Firestopping - Penetrations thru Fire Rated

Floors & Partitions1.00 ls 11,600.00 11,600

677 HVAC Systems & Equipt Start-Up 10.00 md 1,011.84 10,118

678 HVAC Systems & Equipt Commissioning Assistance 20.00 md 1,011.84 20,237

D3090.300 - Misc Materials and Methods 5,704,802D3090 - Misc HVAC Systems 5,704,802

D30 - HVAC 24,942,863D40 - FIRE PROTECTION

D4000 - Fire Supression Common Work RequirementsD4000.000 - FP - Common Work Requirements

679 Project management 1.00 ls 7,500.00 7,500

680 Premium for project phasing 1.00 ls 10,000.00 10,000

681 Temporary conditions/turn up heads 1.00 ls 25,000.00 25,000

682 Demolition/cut, drop & make safe/square foot 619,390.00 sf 0.03 15,485

683 General requirements/square foot 619,390.00 sf 0.35 216,787

684 Commissioning support 1.00 ls 7,500.00 7,500

685 Reconciliation Adjustment (1.00) ls 1,386,315.00 (1,386,315)

D4000.000 - FP - Common Work Requirements (1,104,044)D4000 - Fire Supression Common Work Requirements (1,104,044)

D4001 - Fire Supression Temporary Services for PhasingD4001.000 - FP - Temporary Services for Phasing

686 Temporary conditions/turn up heads 1.00 ls 25,000.00 25,000

687 Temporary FD connections - Install 1.00 ea 3,500.00 3,500

688 Temporary FD connection - Demo 1.00 ea 1,500.00 1,500

689 Temporary valves & piping - Install 1.00 ls 40,000.00 40,000

690 Temporary valves & piping - Demo 1.00 ls 5,000.00 5,000

D4001.000 - FP - Temporary Services for Phasing 75,000D4001 - Fire Supression Temporary Services for Phasing 75,000

D4020 - Fire Supression EquipmentD4020.020 - FP - Fire Pumps

691 Electric Fire Pump w/Controller (1,000 GPM) 1.00 ea 25,173.76 25,174

692 Jockey Pump 1.00 ea 3,607.92 3,608

693 - Offload & rigging/SPK pump 1.00 ea 1,157.92 1,158

694 - Start up/SPK pump 1.00 ea 289.48 289

D4020.020 - FP - Fire Pumps 30,229





D40 - FIRE PROTECTIOND4020 - Fire Supression Equipment

D4020.021 - FP - Air Compressor695 Air Compressor/ ? HP 1.00 ea 8,320.70 8,321

696 - Offload & distribution/SPK compressor 1.00 ea 132.24 132

697 - Start up/SPK compressor 1.00 ea 33.06 33

D4020.021 - FP - Air Compressor 8,486D4020.022 - FP - Valves & Accessories

698 Double check valve assembly 8" - Backup 1.00 ea 7,675.54 7,676

699 Double check valve assembly 8" - Primary 2.00 ea 7,675.54 15,351

700 Double check valve assembly 4" - Concession 1.00 ea 3,594.95 3,595

701 Pressure Regulating Valve/Grooved 8" - Backup 1.00 ea 7,479.48 7,479

702 Pressure Regulating Valve/Grooved 8" - Pimary 1.00 ea 7,479.48 7,479

703 Pressure Regulating Valve/Grooved 4" - Concession 1.00 ea 2,761.47 2,761

704 Check Detector Valve - Concession 1.00 ea 4,013.32 4,013

705 Check Detector Valve - Backup 1.00 ea 4,042.87 4,043

706 Check Detector Valve - Primary 1.00 ea 4,042.87 4,043

707 Wet Alarm Check Valve Assembly - Concession 1.00 ea 3,883.22 3,883

708 Wet Alarm Check Valve Assembly - Backup 1.00 ea 3,883.22 3,883

709 Wet Alarm Check Valve Assembly - Primary 4.00 ea 3,883.22 15,533

710 Inspector test & drain station/Floor/2-1/2" 17.00 ea 1,933.09 32,863

711 Valve w/fire hose connection/Floor/2-1/2" - FDV's 30.00 ea 1,308.43 39,253

712 Control valve assembly/Floor/2-1/2" - ZCV's 17.00 ea 3,614.69 61,450

713 Valve cabinet w/fire hose connection/Floor/2-1/2" - FDVC's

2.00 ea 3,243.65 6,487

714 Water motor gong 3.00 ea 1,618.46 4,855

715 Hose Connection/Siamese (Storz) - Concession 1.00 ea 479.60 480

716 Hose Connection/Roof manifold - Primary 1.00 ea 479.60 480

717 Hose Connection/Siamese (Storz) - Backup 1.00 ea 779.08 779

718 Fire Pump Test Header/2-way - Concession 1.00 ea 1,711.41 1,711

719 Fire Pump Test Header/4-way - Backup 1.00 ea 3,477.78 3,478

720 Hose Connection/Siamese (Storz) - Primary 1.00 ea 779.08 779

721 Fire Pump Test Header/4-way - Primary 1.00 ea 3,477.78 3,478

D4020.022 - FP - Valves & Accessories 235,833D4020.024 - FP - Sprinkler Heads

722 Sprinkler head/Upright 725.00 ea 111.41 80,770

Avg. = 130sf/Head

723 Sprinkler head/Pendant/Semi-recessed 4,000.00 ea 163.81 655,224

Avg. = 130sf/Head





D40 - FIRE PROTECTIOND4020 - Fire Supression Equipment

D4020.024 - FP - Sprinkler Heads724 Sprinkler head/Sidewall/Exposed 50.00 ea 117.38 5,869

Avg. = 130sf/Head

725 Sprinkler head/Dry pendant/Exposed 10.00 ea 254.84 2,548

Avg. = 130sf/Head\b\i

D4020.024 - FP - Sprinkler Heads 744,411D4020 - Fire Supression Equipment 1,018,959

D4030 - Fire Protection SpecialtiesD4030.010 - FP - Wet-Pipe Sprinkler System

726 Sch 40 Galv Steel (ERW) Pipe & Ftgs/T&C - Alarm to gong

120.00 lf 46.42 5,571

727 Ductile Iron/Cement-Lined/Primary service entrance 8" 40.00 lf 533.19 21,328

728 Ductile Iron/Cement-Lined/Back up service entrance 8" 20.00 lf 533.19 10,664

729 Ductile Iron/Cement-Lined/Concession service entrance 4"

30.00 lf 363.57 10,907

730 Sch 40 Black Steel (ERW) Pipe & Ftgs/T&C - SPK branches

26,000.00 lf 33.41 868,754

731 Sch 10 Black Steel (LW) Pipe & Ftgs/Grooved - SPK drain

2,000.00 lf 59.70 119,394

732 Sch 10 Black Steel (LW) Pipe & Ftgs/Grooved - SPK mains

8,500.00 lf 109.70 932,483

733 - Hangers & clamps/SPK wet piping 36,500.00 lf 2.56 93,364

734 - Clean & test system/SPK wet piping 1.00 ea 5,789.60 5,790

735 - Fill & vent system/SPK wet piping 1.00 ea 5,539.60 5,540

D4030.010 - FP - Wet-Pipe Sprinkler System 2,073,793D4030.020 - FP - Dry-Pipe Sprinkler System

736 Sch 40 Galv Steel (ERW) Pipe & Ftgs/T&C - SPK branches

200.00 lf 35.36 7,073

737 - Hangers & clamps/SPK dry piping 200.00 lf 2.56 512

738 - Clean & test system/SPK dry piping 1.00 ea 628.96 629

739 - Fill & vent system/SPK dry piping 1.00 ea 578.96 579

D4030.020 - FP - Dry-Pipe Sprinkler System 8,792D4030 - Fire Protection Specialties 2,082,585

D40 - FIRE PROTECTION 2,072,500D50 - ELECTRICAL

D5000 - ElectricalD5000.000 - Electrical

740 PV System - Install Only 1.00 ea 800,000.00 800,000

741 PV System - Install Only 1.00 ea (800,000.00) (800,000)

D5000.000 - Electrical -





D50 - ELECTRICALD5000 - Electrical

D5011.010 - Electrical Distribution742 Temporaary Electrical Lighting and Power 411,600.00 sf 1.00 411,600

743 Temporary Electrical Service to Site 1.00 ea 35,000.00 35,000

D5011.010 - Electrical Distribution 446,600D5000 - Electrical 446,600

D5010 - Electrical DistributionD5011.010 - Electrical Distribution

744 Gear and Distribution 414,500.00 sf 3.50 1,450,750

745 Generator and ATS 414,500.00 sf 1.25 518,125

746 Equipment Connections 414,500.00 sf 2.35 974,075

D5011.010 - Electrical Distribution 2,942,950D5010 - Electrical Distribution 2,942,950

D5020 - LightingD5011.010 - Electrical Distribution

747 Lighting Fixtures and Wiring 414,500.00 sf 10.25 4,248,625

748 Lighting Controls and Wiring 414,500.00 sf 1.95 808,275

D5011.010 - Electrical Distribution 5,056,900D5020 - Lighting 5,056,900

D5025 - POWER BRANCH WIRINGD5011.010 - Electrical Distribution

749 Branch Power Wiring 414,500.00 sf 3.25 1,347,125

D5011.010 - Electrical Distribution 1,347,125D5025 - POWER BRANCH WIRING 1,347,125

D5031 - FIRE ALARM & DETECTION SYSTEMD5011.010 - Electrical Distribution

750 Fire Alarm System 414,500.00 sf 2.55 1,056,975

751 Bi-Directional Amplificaiton system 414,500.00 sf 0.55 227,975

D5011.010 - Electrical Distribution 1,284,950D5031 - FIRE ALARM & DETECTION SYSTEM 1,284,950

D5032 - ELECTRONIC ACCESS CONTROL & INTRUSION DETECTIOND5011.010 - Electrical Distribution

752 CCTV and Card Access Control System 414,500.00 sf 3.00 1,243,500

D5011.010 - Electrical Distribution 1,243,500D5032 - ELECTRONIC ACCESS CONTROL & INTRUSION DETECTION 1,243,500





D50 - ELECTRICALD5040 - COMMUNICATIONS

D5011.010 - Electrical Distribution753 TD System 414,500.00 sf 3.00 1,243,500

754 Clock System 414,500.00 sf 0.35 145,075

755 AV Rough-in 414,500.00 sf 4.25 1,761,625

D5011.010 - Electrical Distribution 3,150,200D5040 - COMMUNICATIONS 3,150,200

D50 - ELECTRICAL 15,472,225E10 - EQUIPMENT

E1010 - Commercial EquipmentE1010.200 - Food Service Equipment

756 Food Service Equipment Allowance 1.00 ls 729,999.98 730,000

E1010.200 - Food Service Equipment 730,000E1010 - Commercial Equipment 730,000

E1030 - Vehicular EquipmentE1030.150 - Loading Dock Equipment

757 Dock Levelers 2.00 ea 7,500.00 15,000

758 Dock Bumpers 4.00 ea 500.00 2,000

759 Dock Bumpers 60.00 lf 80.00 4,800

E1030.150 - Loading Dock Equipment 21,800E1030 - Vehicular Equipment 21,800

E1090 - Other EquipmentE1020.150 - Theater & Stage Equipment

760 Theater & Stage Rigging & Draperies Allowance 1.00 ls 950,000.00 950,000

761 Theater & Stage Rigging & Draperies - Additional from Reconciliation

1.00 ls 510,500.00 510,500

762 Portable Platform Stage Extension 1.00 ls 25,000.00 25,000

763 Stage Pipe Grid System Allowance 1.00 ls 40,000.00 40,000

E1020.150 - Theater & Stage Equipment 1,525,500E1020.350 - Laboratory Equipment

764 Emergency eye wash/deluge cabinets - in Plumbing - ea - -

765 Kiln, Large, Low Fire 1.00 ea 10,000.00 10,000

766 Kiln, Raku 1.00 ea 4,000.00 4,000

767 Kiln, Small, High Fire 1.00 ea 5,000.00 5,000

E1020.350 - Laboratory Equipment 19,000E1090.050 - Solid Waste Handling Equipment

768 Exterior Dust Collection Equipment 1.00 allw 10,000.00 10,000

769 Tracks, Trolleys, Cranes in Shops/Labs 1.00 allw 25,000.00 25,000





E10 - EQUIPMENTE1090 - Other Equipment

E1090.050 - Solid Waste Handling Equipment770 Waste Compactors - NIC - NIC - -

E1090.050 - Solid Waste Handling Equipment 35,000E1090.150 - Residential Equipment

771 Residential Appliances - Allwance 1.00 allw 75,000.00 75,000

E1090.150 - Residential Equipment 75,000E2010.500 - Laboratory Casework

772 Kiln Hoods 3.00 ea 1,414.07 4,242

773 Fume Hoods, Portable 17.00 ea 12,000.00 204,000

E2010.500 - Laboratory Casework 208,242E2010.900 - Fixed Multiple Seating

774 Telescoping Bleachers, Motor Operated, 2000 person capacity

6,300.00 sf 50.00 315,000

E2010.900 - Fixed Multiple Seating 315,000G2040.200 - Athletic & Recreational Equipment

775 Basketball Goals, Ceiling Mounted, Retractable 6.00 ea 27,500.00 165,000

776 Gym Wall Padding 2,040.00 sf 20.00 40,800

777 Gym Divider Curtain, 115' x 42' 1.00 ea 40,000.00 40,000

778 Volleyball Standards 4.00 sets 8,500.00 34,000

779 Batting Cages & Rigging - Allowance 1.00 allw 6,000.00 6,000

780 Gym Mat Hoist - Allowance 1.00 allw 50,000.00 50,000

781 Climbing Wall & Rigging - Allowance 1.00 allw 20,000.00 20,000

782 Wrestling Mats - NIC (FFE) - allw - -

783 Score Boards / Shot Clocks 2.00 ea 20,000.00 40,000

G2040.200 - Athletic & Recreational Equipment 395,800E1090 - Other Equipment 2,573,542

E10 - EQUIPMENT 3,325,342E20 - FURNISHINGS

E2010 - Fixed FurnishingsE2010.100 - Fixed Casework

784 Display Cases 1.00 allw 50,000.00 50,000

785 Cubbies 1.00 allw 50,000.00 50,000

786 Desk - Library / Circulation 1.00 allw 20,000.00 20,000

787 Desk - Admin 1.00 allw 15,000.00 15,000

788 Desk - Security 1.00 allw 10,000.00 10,000

789 Benches, Locker Room - None shown - NIC - lf - -

790 Book Cases 1.00 allw 250,000.00 250,000





E20 - FURNISHINGSE2010 - Fixed Furnishings

E2010.100 - Fixed Casework791 Window Sill 4,401.00 lf 35.00 154,035

E2010.100 - Fixed Casework 549,035E2010.800 - Window Treatments

792 Window shades in Science Classroom - Motorized 8,382.00 sf 20.00 167,640

793 Window shades for 8' Diameter skylight (10 each) 500.00 sf 20.00 10,000

794 Window shades for 27' Diameter skylight (2 each) 1,144.00 sf 20.00 22,880

795 Window shades for 4x4 skylight (38 each) 608.00 sf 20.00 12,160

796 Window shades for 5' Diameter skylight (6 each) 120.00 sf 20.00 2,400

797 Window shades for Rec skylight over gym(1 each) 710.00 sf 20.00 14,200

798 Window shades for 6.66' Diameter skylight (3 each) 105.00 sf 20.00 2,100

799 Window shades for Rec/triangle skylight (2 each) 474.00 sf 20.00 9,480

E2010.800 - Window Treatments 240,860E2010.850 - Fixed Floor Grilles & Mats

800 EM - Foot Grilles, Interior, Recessed at Vestibule Entrances

1,503.00 sf 75.00 112,725

801 Floor Mat and Frame, Interior, Recessed at Corridor Entrances

526.00 sf 8.00 4,208

E2010.850 - Fixed Floor Grilles & Mats 116,933E2010.900 - Fixed Multiple Seating

802 Fixed Auditorium Seating - Auditorium 435.00 ea 400.00 174,000

803 Fixed Auditorium Seating - Discourse Lab 132.00 ea 400.00 52,800

E2010.900 - Fixed Multiple Seating 226,800E2010 - Fixed Furnishings 1,133,628

E2020 - Movable FurnishingsE2020.100 - Furniture & Accessories

804 Movable Furnishings, NIC - lf - -

E2020.100 - Furniture & Accessories -E2020 - Movable Furnishings -

E2030 - Manufacturered CaseworkE1020.350 - Laboratory Equipment

805 Laboratory Equipment / Fixtures - NIC - NIC - -

E1020.350 - Laboratory Equipment -E2010.100 - Fixed Casework

806 Base Cabinets, Maple, Solid Surface Top 219.00 lf 350.00 76,650

807 Tall Cabinets, Maple 386.00 lf 900.00 347,400

808 Wall Cabinets, Maple 32.00 lf 300.00 9,600

809 Base & Wall Cabinets, Maple, Solid Surface Top 595.00 lf 650.00 386,750





E20 - FURNISHINGSE2030 - Manufacturered Casework

E2010.100 - Fixed Casework810 Epoxy Resin Top - NIC - NIC - -

E2010.100 - Fixed Casework 820,400E2010.500 - Laboratory Casework

811 Laboratory Casework - Base Cabinets 690.00 lf 375.00 258,750

812 Laboratory Casework - Wall & Base Cabinets 676.00 lf 700.00 473,200

813 Laboratory Casework - Tall Cabinets 35.00 lf 1,000.00 35,000

E2010.500 - Laboratory Casework 766,950E2030 - Manufacturered Casework 1,587,350

E20 - FURNISHINGS 2,720,978F20 - SELECTIVE BUILDING DEMOLITION

F2010 - Building Elements DemolitionF2010.000 - Building Elements Demolition

814 Demo & Remove Existing SOG 124,363.00 sf 1.50 186,545

815 Demo & Remove Existing Foundation Basement Walls & Footings

3,169.00 lf 60.00 190,140

816 Demo Existing School Buildings - Footprint 124,363.00 sf 22.00 2,735,986

817 Drywall Partition Demolition - Temporary Exterior Wall 26,000.00 sf 15.00 390,000

F2010.000 - Building Elements Demolition 3,502,671F2010 - Building Elements Demolition 3,502,671

F2020 - Hazardous Components AbatementF2020.000 - Hazardous Components Abatement

818 Hazardous Material Abatement 1.00 ea 4,000,000.00 4,000,000

F2020.000 - Hazardous Components Abatement 4,000,000F2020 - Hazardous Components Abatement 4,000,000

F20 - SELECTIVE BUILDING DEMOLITION 7,502,671G10 - SITE PREPARATION

G1010 - Site ClearingG1010.100 - Site Clearing

819 Temp Construction Entrance 2,033.00 sf 6.50 13,215

820 Temp Construction Fence 3,000.00 lf 16.00 48,000

821 Misc. Temp Construction 1.00 ea 100,000.00 100,000

822 Parking / Laydown Area Crushed Stone 3,000.00 sf 10.00 30,000

823 22' W. Double Swing Gate 2.00 ea 2,500.00 5,000

G1010.100 - Site Clearing 196,215G1010.300 - Clearing & Grubbing

824 Clear & Grub Site 20.00 ac 4,500.00 90,000





G10 - SITE PREPARATIONG1010 - Site Clearing

G1010.300 - Clearing & Grubbing825 Remove Trees 66.00 ea 650.00 42,900

826 Tree Protection 1,265.00 lf 24.00 30,360

G1010.300 - Clearing & Grubbing 163,260G1010.500 - Stripping & Stockpiling Soil

827 Strip & Stockpile Top Soil, 6" (250,000 sf) 4,629.00 cy 6.00 27,774

828 Haul & Dispose of Topsoil 7,407.00 tn 20.00 148,140

G1010.500 - Stripping & Stockpiling Soil 175,914G1010 - Site Clearing 535,389

G1020 - Site Demolition & RelocationsG1020.000 - Site Demolition & Relocations

829 Demo Bituminous Concrete Roadways / Parking 170,290.00 sf 2.85 485,327

830 Remove Utility Lines 201.00 lf 40.00 8,040

831 Miscellaneous Site Demolition 700,000.00 sf 0.75 525,000

832 Remove 6" Water Pipe 681.00 lf 40.00 27,240

833 Remove Underground Fuel Tanks, Allowance 3.00 ea 65,000.00 195,000

G1020.000 - Site Demolition & Relocations 1,240,607G1020 - Site Demolition & Relocations 1,240,607

G1030 - Site EarthworkG1030.100 - Grading

834 Finish Grading (846,991 sf - 20 Acres) 846,991.00 sf 0.15 127,049

835 Rough Grading (846,991 sf - 20 Acres) 846,991.00 sf 0.10 84,699

G1030.100 - Grading 211,748G1030.200 - Excavating, Backfilling & Compacting

836 Export Excess Material (Respread to Elim Contaminated Soils T&D

- NA - -

837 Drill Wells, Allowance 300.00 ea - -

838 Contaminated Soils T & D (For 300 Wells), Allowance 1.00 ea 1,000,000.00 1,000,000

839 Over-Excavation of Unsuitable Material, Allowance - NA - -

840 Site Cuts (Assume 2' Avg.) - 147,608 sf 10,000.00 cy 25.00 250,000

841 Localized Dewatering, Allowance 1.00 ea 75,000.00 75,000

842 Removal of Existing PIFS and Concrete Shafts, Allowance

1.00 ea 150,000.00 150,000

843 Soils Disposal Allowance 1.00 ea 1,000,000.00 1,000,000

G1030.200 - Excavating, Backfilling & Compacting 2,475,000G1030.500 - Slope Protection & Erosion Control

844 CB Inlet Filter Protection 37.00 ea 225.00 8,325

845 Silt Fence 2,857.00 lf 5.00 14,285





G10 - SITE PREPARATIONG1030 - Site Earthwork

G1030.500 - Slope Protection & Erosion Control846 Misc. Erosion Control 1.00 ea 50,000.00 50,000

847 Hay Bales 2,857.00 lf 3.00 8,571

G1030.500 - Slope Protection & Erosion Control 81,181G1030 - Site Earthwork 2,767,929

G10 - SITE PREPARATION 4,543,924G20 - SITE IMPROVEMENTS

G2010 - RoadwaysG2010.200 - Flexible Roadway Pavement

848 4" Bituminous Pavement 13,550.00 sy 25.00 338,750

849 12" Dense-Graded Subbase 5,194.00 cy 35.00 181,790

850 Tabled Crossing 243.00 sy 25.00 6,075

G2010.200 - Flexible Roadway Pavement 526,615G2010.600 - Roadway Appurtenances

851 Handicap Parking Space Symbol 4.00 ea 75.00 300

852 Handicap Van Parking Space Symbol 4.00 ea 250.00 1,000

853 Roadway Marking & Striping, Allowance 1.00 ea 5,000.00 5,000

854 Stripe Parking Spaces 245.00 ea 25.00 6,125

855 8' W. Crosswalk 107.00 lf 25.00 2,675

G2010.600 - Roadway Appurtenances 15,100G2010 - Roadways 541,715

G2020 - Parking LotsG2020.500 - Parking Lot Curbs & Gutters

856 Granite Curbing 6,181.00 lf 40.00 247,240

857 Granite Curbing - Street 657.00 lf 42.00 27,594

G2020.500 - Parking Lot Curbs & Gutters 274,834G2020.600 - Parking Lot Appurtenances

858 Traffic / Parking Signs, Allowance 1.00 ea 15,000.00 15,000

859 HC Parking Signs 4.00 ea 300.00 1,200

G2020.600 - Parking Lot Appurtenances 16,200G2020 - Parking Lots 291,034

G2030 - Pedestrian PavingG2030.300 - Pedestrian Unit Pavers

860 3/4" Bituminous Setting Bed 3,283.00 sf 1.00 3,283

861 Granite Pavers 3,283.00 sf 22.00 72,226

862 3/4" Bituminous Setting Bed 1,260.00 sf 1.00 1,260





G20 - SITE IMPROVEMENTSG2030 - Pedestrian Paving

G2030.300 - Pedestrian Unit Pavers863 6" Gravel Subbase 27.00 cy 30.00 810

864 Grass Pavers 402.00 sf 18.00 7,236

865 5" Concrete Slab w/Drainage Holes 3,283.00 sf 6.00 19,698

866 Brick Pavers 1,260.00 sf 22.00 27,720

867 6" Gravel Subbase 70.00 cy 30.00 2,100

868 5" Concrete Slab w/Drainage Holes 1,260.00 sf 6.00 7,560

869 6" Gravel Subbase 9.00 cy 30.00 270

G2030.300 - Pedestrian Unit Pavers 142,163G2030.400 - Rigid Pedestrian Pavement

870 Stabilized Stone Dust 4,552.00 sf 1.50 6,828

871 Bike Ramp Surface 10,602.00 sf 15.00 159,030


873 6" Gravel Subbase 1,466.00 cy 30.00 43,980

874 5" Broom Finished Concrete Walkway 68,842.00 sf 8.50 585,157

875 Colored Concrete Paving - Dining Courtyard 2,551.00 sf 15.00 38,265



878 Concrete Curb Cut w/Detectable Warning Surface (8 Locations)

100.00 sf 40.00 4,000


880 Colored Concrete Paving 34,427.00 sf 15.00 516,405

881 Simplify Amphitheater Design 1.00 sf (274,884.00) (274,884)

G2030.400 - Rigid Pedestrian Pavement 1,112,081G2030.550 - Exterior Pads & Slabs

882 Transformer Concrete Pad 100.00 sf 12.00 1,200

883 Generator Concrete Pad 100.00 sf 12.00 1,200

884 Misc. Concrete Pads (2 Each) 100.00 sf 10.00 1,000

885 Chiller Concrete Pad 140.00 sf 12.00 1,680

886 8" Gravel Subbase 30.00 cy 30.00 900

887 Recycling Container Concrete Pads (4 Each) 120.00 sf 12.00 1,440

888 Concrete Pad w/Haunch - Bikes 500.00 sf 12.00 6,000

G2030.550 - Exterior Pads & Slabs 13,420G2030.600 - Exterior Steps & Ramps

889 Concrete Stairs - East Side - 14' w. 6.00 trd 2,625.00 15,750

890 Concrete Stairs at Amphitheater - 4' w. 10.00 trd 750.00 7,500

891 Guardrail at Long Stair - Entry 277.00 lf 225.00 62,325





G20 - SITE IMPROVEMENTSG2030 - Pedestrian Paving

G2030.600 - Exterior Steps & Ramps892 Concrete Stairs - Entry 4.00 flt 10,000.00 40,000

893 Stair Handrail w/Strip Light 125.00 lf 300.00 37,500

G2030.600 - Exterior Steps & Ramps 163,075G2030 - Pedestrian Paving 1,430,739

G2040 - Site DevelopmentG2040.000 - Site Development

894 Granite Block Seating 698.00 lf 350.00 244,300

895 Water Bubbler 1.00 ea 8,500.00 8,500

896 Wood Terrace 969.00 sf 50.00 48,450

897 Bike Ramp Structure Cantilvered off Retaining Wall, Allowance

400.00 lf 1,500.00 600,000

898 Bike Ramp on Grade, Allowance 200.00 lf 150.00 30,000

899 Bike Ramp Structure on Pillars - 50 Locations (3 Piles per Pillar), Allowance

680.00 lf 2,000.00 1,360,000

900 PV Structure at Existing Bleachers, Allowance 3,000.00 sf 45.00 135,000

901 PV Structure at West Parking Lot, Allowance 15,000.00 sf 45.00 675,000

902 Concession Stand, Allowance 566.00 sf 125.00 70,750

903 Raised Planter Wall at Dining Courtyard, Allowance 150.00 lf 400.00 60,000

904 Simplify Bike Ramp 1.00 ea (1,000,000.00)

(1,000,000)

905 Delete PV Structures at Parking lot and bleachers 1.00 ea (370,423.00) (370,423)

G2040.000 - Site Development 1,861,577G2040.100 - Fencing & Gates

906 CLF Gates 4.00 ea 750.00 3,000

907 Chain Link Fence - Short 431.00 lf 26.00 11,206

908 Ornamental Fence w/Gate 169.00 lf 160.00 27,040

909 Wood Board Fence 88.00 lf 60.00 5,280

G2040.100 - Fencing & Gates 46,526G2040.150 - Athletic & Recreational Surfaces

910 Shot Put Circle / Event Area 3,849.00 sf 2.00 7,698

911 Softball Field - Complete 45,153.00 sf 2.75 124,171


913 Poured-in-Place Rubber Safety Surface 6,461.00 sf 18.00 116,298

914 Underdrain at Sports Field Mix 10,924.00 sf 4.00 43,696

915 Baseball / Football Practice Field 96,739.00 sf 3.50 338,587

916 Turf Fields premiums for Baseball and softball 1.00 ea 1,130,264.00 1,130,264

917 Athletic Field Lighting 1.00 ea 1,300,000.00 1,300,000





G20 - SITE IMPROVEMENTSG2040 - Site Development

G2040.150 - Athletic & Recreational Surfaces 3,064,577G2040.200 - Athletic & Recreational Equipment

918 Playground Equipment, Allowance 6.00 ea 40,000.00 240,000

G2040.200 - Athletic & Recreational Equipment 240,000G2040.250 - Site & Street Furnishings

919 Bike Repair Station 1.00 ea 1,200.00 1,200

920 Freestanding Bench 865.00 lf 250.00 216,250

921 Bike Racks, Allowance 35.00 ea 650.00 22,750

922 Trash / Recycling Containers, Allowance 8.00 ea 3,500.00 28,000

923 Memorial Bench, Allowance 1.00 ea 5,000.00 5,000

924 Fixed Metal Bollards, Allowance 27.00 ea 1,200.00 32,400

925 Decorative Sign Main Entrance, Allowance 1.00 ea 30,000.00 30,000

926 Memorial Foundation, Allowance 3.00 ea 2,500.00 7,500

927 Retractable Bollards, Allowance 38.00 ea 2,500.00 95,000

G2040.250 - Site & Street Furnishings 438,100G2040.400 - Flagpoles

928 Flag Pole Foundation 2.00 cy 1,500.00 3,000

929 Flagpole, 50' 2.00 ea 4,500.00 9,000

G2040.400 - Flagpoles 12,000G2040.500 - Retaining Walls

930 Retaining Wall 6 - Replace Existing Block Wall, Allowance 278.00 lf 352.66 98,039

931 Retaining Wall 5, Allowance 244.00 lf 277.66 67,749

932 Retaining Wall 3 - Avg. 7'6" h. 253.00 lf 327.66 82,898

933 Retaining Wall 2 - Avg. 6' h. 57.00 lf 285.00 16,245

934 Retaining Wall 1 - West Side 87.00 lf 300.00 26,100

935 54" h. Stainless Steel Cyclist Guard 1,078.00 lf 200.00 215,600

936 Retaining Wall 4 - Avg. 6' h. 272.00 lf 312.66 85,043

G2040.500 - Retaining Walls 591,674G2040 - Site Development 6,254,454

G2050 - LandscapingG2050.100 - Irrigation System

937 Irrigation System - Restoration Mix 42,175.00 sf 1.50 63,263

938 Irrigation System - Lawn 72,339.00 sf 1.50 108,509

939 Irrigation System - Sports Field Mix 10,924.00 sf 1.50 16,386

940 Irrigation System - Planting Beds 14,182.00 sf 1.50 21,273

G2050.100 - Irrigation System 209,430





G20 - SITE IMPROVEMENTSG2050 - Landscaping

G2050.300 - Soil Preparation941 Lawn Seed Mix - Sports Field Mix 233.00 cy 40.00 9,320

942 Restoration Mix 898.00 cy 40.00 35,920

943 6" Loam for Standard Lawn - On Slope 482.00 cy 40.00 19,280

944 Planting Soil Mix - 12" at Groundcover (14,182 sf) 604.00 cy 85.00 51,340

945 Meadow Mix 400.00 cy 40.00 16,000

946 6" Loam for Standard Lawn 995.00 cy 40.00 39,800

947 Planting Soil Mix - 18" at Planting Beds (2,266 sf) 145.00 cy 85.00 12,325

G2050.300 - Soil Preparation 183,985G2050.400 - Lawns & Grasses

948 Meadow Mix 18,746.00 sf 0.35 6,561

949 Restoration Mix 42,175.00 sf 0.35 14,761

950 Lawn Seed Mix 49,687.00 sf 0.30 14,906

951 Restore Embankment 34,828.00 sf 0.35 12,190

952 Lawn Seed Mix - Sports Field Mix 10,924.00 sf 0.35 3,823

953 Lawn Seed Mix - On Slope 22,652.00 sf 0.35 7,928

G2050.400 - Lawns & Grasses 60,170G2050.500 - Trees, Plants & Ground Covers

954 Proposal Vegetative Roof Assembly 8,000.00 sf 30.00 240,000

955 Trees - Evergreen 8.00 ea 650.00 5,200

956 Trees - Signature, Allowance 4.00 ea 3,000.00 12,000

957 Shrubs 344.00 ea 75.00 25,800

958 Groundcover, Allowance 14,182.00 sf 7.00 99,274

959 Planting Accessories 373.00 ea 75.00 27,975

960 Trees - Large, Allowance 163.00 ea 1,000.00 163,000

961 Shrubs - Large 27.00 ea 125.00 3,375

962 Mulch - Planting Beds 170.00 cy 85.00 14,450

963 Mulch - Trees 188.00 cy 85.00 15,980

964 Maintenance / Warranty 1.00 ea 30,000.00 30,000

965 Trees - Medium, Allowance 198.00 ea 750.00 148,500

966 Site Target Reduction 1.00 ea (70,000.00) (70,000)

G2050.500 - Trees, Plants & Ground Covers 715,554G2050 - Landscaping 1,169,139

G20 - SITE IMPROVEMENTS 9,687,081





G30 - SITE CIVIL/MECHANICAL UTILITIESG3010 - Water Supply

G3010.200 - Site Domestic Water System967 4" DICL Water Pipe 62.00 lf 175.00 10,850

968 6" DICL Water Pipe - Domestic to Field Restrooms 30.00 lf 175.00 5,250

969 6" DICL Water Pipe - Relocated 641.00 lf 175.00 112,175

970 6" DICL Water Pipe - Domestic 72.00 lf 175.00 12,600

G3010.200 - Site Domestic Water System 140,875G3010.300 - Site Fire Protection Water System

971 6" DICL Water Pipe 758.00 lf 200.00 151,600

G3010.300 - Site Fire Protection Water System 151,600G3010 - Water Supply 292,475

G3020 - Sanitary SewerG3020.100 - Sanitary Sewer System

972 Doghouse Sewer Manholes 2.00 ea 4,500.00 9,000

973 6" PVC Sewer Pipe - Temp Line 184.00 lf 105.00 19,320

974 6" PVC Sewer Pipe 1,789.00 lf 105.00 187,845

975 Sewer Manhole Risers 2.00 ea 1,000.00 2,000

976 CTE Sewer Manhole 2.00 ea 3,000.00 6,000

977 Cleanout 1.00 ea 250.00 250

978 Sewer Manholes 12.00 ea 4,000.00 48,000

979 Testing 1.00 ea 1,500.00 1,500

980 Science Waste Tanks, Allowance 2.00 ea 10,000.00 20,000

G3020.100 - Sanitary Sewer System 293,915G3020 - Sanitary Sewer 293,915

G3030 - Storm SewerG3030.100 - Storm Water System

981 18" HDPE 576.00 lf 125.00 72,000

982 36" HDPE Auxillary Line 179.00 lf 200.00 35,800

983 12" HDPE 1,070.00 lf 125.00 133,750

984 36" HDPE 649.00 lf 200.00 129,800

985 15" HDPE 247.00 lf 125.00 30,875

986 Relocated Roof Drain 98.00 lf 125.00 12,250

987 Subsurface Stormwater Infiltration System 1,598.00 sf 185.00 295,630

988 CB - Catch Basins 7.00 ea 4,300.00 30,100

989 SOE - 6' Exposed 1,200.00 sf 45.00 54,000

990 DMH - Doghouse Drain Manhole 1.00 ea 4,500.00 4,500

991 DMH - Drain Manholes 17.00 ea 4,000.00 68,000

992 DMH - Drain Manholes Risers 2.00 ea 1,000.00 2,000





G30 - SITE CIVIL/MECHANICAL UTILITIESG3030 - Storm Sewer

G3030.100 - Storm Water System 868,705G3030 - Storm Sewer 868,705

G3060 - Fuel DistributionG3060.100 - Gas System

993 Temp Gas Line 300.00 lf 125.00 37,500

994 Permanent Gas Line 97.00 lf 125.00 12,125

G3060.100 - Gas System 49,625G3060 - Fuel Distribution 49,625

G30 - SITE CIVIL/MECHANICAL UTILITIES 1,504,720G40 - SITE ELECTRICAL UTILITIES

G2040 - Site DevelopmentG2040.200 - Athletic & Recreational Equipment

995 Scoreboards 2.00 ea 10,000.00 20,000

G2040.200 - Athletic & Recreational Equipment 20,000G2040 - Site Development 20,000

G4010 - Electrical DistributionG4010.200 - Electrical Power Distribution

996 E, B, Conduit & Wire - Scoreboard 300.00 lf 35.00 10,500

997 Conduit & Wire - Street Lighting (80 lf/light) 1,920.00 lf 20.00 38,400

998 P2 - Street Light Pole Base 2.00 ea 1,500.00 3,000

999 Ductbank - Gym to Athletic Toilet Facility Bldg 349.00 lf 85.00 29,665

1000 Emergency Electric Ductbank 221.00 lf 100.00 22,100

1001 Secondary Electric Ductbank 181.00 lf 100.00 18,100

1002 Primary Electric Ductbank 38.00 lf 85.00 3,230

1003 P1 - Single Mast Street Lights 22.00 ea 3,500.00 77,000

1004 P2 - Dbl Mast Street Lights 2.00 ea 3,500.00 7,000

1005 Sports Field Lighting - NA - -

1006 Tel/Data Ductbank 303.00 lf 100.00 30,300

1007 Excavation & Backfill - Pedestrian Lighting (60 lf/light) 2,280.00 lf 10.00 22,800

1008 P3 - Pedestrian Light Pole Base 38.00 ea 650.00 24,700

1009 P3 - Pedestrian Lights 38.00 ea 3,500.00 133,000

1010 Conduit & Wire - Pedestrian Lighting (60 lf/light) 2,280.00 lf 20.00 45,600

1011 Excavation & Backfill - Street Lighting (80 lf/light) 1,920.00 lf 10.00 19,200

1012 P1 - Street Light Pole Base 22.00 ea 1,200.00 26,400

1013 Fire Pump Service Ductbank 186.00 lf 85.00 15,810

1014 Install PV System at Existing Bleachers, Allowance 3,000.00 sf 67.00 201,000

1015 Install PV System at West Parking Lot, Allowance 15,000.00 sf 67.00 1,005,000





G40 - SITE ELECTRICAL UTILITIESG4010 - Electrical Distribution

G4010.200 - Electrical Power Distribution1016 Traffic Light at Mill Street, Allowance 1.00 ea 350,000.00 350,000

1017 Delete PV system and EV ready 1.00 ea (1,255,950.00)

(1,255,950)

G4010.200 - Electrical Power Distribution 826,855G4010 - Electrical Distribution 826,855

G40 - SITE ELECTRICAL UTILITIES 846,855--- - Base 172,373,725

Total 172,373,725

Estimate Total 172,373,725




O. Updated Project Work Plan

OPM’s Work Plan

Designer’s Work Plan

Project Schedule



Updated Project Work Plan

Roles and Responsibilities

The Arlington High School Project is overseen by the School Building Committee, Chaired by Jeffrey Thielman, The Superintendent of Schools, Kathleen Bodie, The Chairperson of the Arlington School Committee, Kirsi Allison-Ampe, and the Arlington Town Manager, Adam Chapdelaine. The Skanska USA Building Inc. Owner’s Project Manager team is led by Dale Caldwell, Project Executive, and Jim Burrows, Project Manager. The HMFH Architects, Inc. Design team is led by Principal-In-Charge, Lori Cowles.

Since the District’s July 20, 2018 submission of the Preferred Schematic Report, Michael Mason has been hired as APS Chief Financial Officer, and has replace John Danizio’s role on the School Building Committee. Otherwise, there has been no other changes to the School Building Committee or Project Team. Below is the complete School Building Committee and Project Team Roster:

Project Directory

Arlington School Building Committee Members:

• Adam Chapdelaine, Town Manager, Committee Vice Chair • Jeffrey Thielman, Committee Chair • Kathleen Bodie, Committee Vice Chair • Sandy Pooler, Deputy Town Manager • Domenic Lanzillotti, Town Procurement Officer (MCPPO Certified) • Kirsi Allison-Ampe, School Committee Chair • Steve Nesterak, Facilities Director • Matthew Janger, Arlington High School Principal • William McCarthy, Arlington High School Assistant Principal • Brian Rehrig, Capital Planning Committee Member, Town Meeting Member • Francis Callahan, President Mass. Bldg. Trades Council, Member of Mass Construction Law Working

Group, UMASS Bldg. Authority Board, and MSBA Advisory Board and Owners Project Manager Review Panel

• John Cole, Architect, Chair of Arlington Permanent Town Bldg. Committee • Kate Loosian, Architect, Design Construction Project Manager at Harvard University, Town Mtg.

Member, Community Volunteer, PTO • Dan Ruiz, Architect, Project Manager for MSBA Funded projects, Town Mtg. Member • Michael Mason, APS Chief Financial Office • Amy Speare, Product Marketing Manager, Community Volunteer • Judson Pierce, Attorney, Former School Committee Member, Town Meting Member • Toby Jackson, Educator, Professional experience overseeing school building projects • Ryan Katofsky, Mechanical Engineer, Energy & Sustainability Professions • Karen Tassone, Executive Assistant to the Superintendent, Recording Secretary


Town of Arlington – Town Manager’s Office:

• Adam Chapdelaine, Town Manager • Sandy Pooler, Deputy Town Manager • Domenic Lanzillotti, Town Procurement Officer (MCPPO Certified)

Owner’s Project Manager – Skanska USA Building Inc.:

• Dale Caldwell, Program Executive, MCPPO Certified • Chuck Adam, Senior Program Manager, MCPPO Certified • Jim Burrows, Program Manager, MCPPO Certified • Victoria Clifford, Program Engineer, MCPPO Certified

Design Team – HMFH Architects, Inc.:

• George Metzger, Project Director, George Metzger, AIA, MCPPO Certified • Lori Cowles, Project Manager and Principal-In-Charge, AIA, CEFP, LEED® AP, MCPPO Certified • Arthur Duffy, Project Architect, AIA, MCPPO Certified • Melissa Greene, Project Architect, AIA, LEED® AP BD+C

(Continued)


Communication Strategy

The following diagrams represent the flow of communication between the personnel identified through the Schematic Design Phase. This document will be updated when the Project Team expands to include a general contractor and subcontractors during the construction phase.

Communication to the Massachusetts School Building Authority

The Owner’s Project Manager (OPM) is responsible for being the conduit to the Massachusetts School Building Authority (MSBA). Any questions or comments directed to the MSBA should be issued through the OPM. In the event that the OPM Team is aware of the discussion point, the District and the Design Team can communicate directly with the MSBA while copying the OPM on the correspondents.

Communication to the Design Team

All design related questions from the School Administration, Educational Task Forces, and the General Public should be filtered through the Interim Superintendent and the Building Committee Chairs. These questions should then be directed to the Design Team while notifying the Owner’s Project Manager. All responses should filter back through the District the same way before being distributed to the appropriate parties.


Scheduling Subcommittee Meetings

Subcommittee Meetings should be scheduled by the Subcommittee Chair at the end of each meeting. The time and location decided upon should be sent to the members subcommittee members and the School Building Committee Chair. These meetings should be posted on the Arlington High School Building website. In the event that another meeting needs to be scheduled, the procedure outlined below should be followed.

Document Control Methods

For purposes of communications and document control, Skanska utilizes tools such as project websites and/or Prolog Project Management or Submittal Exchange software, which is considered to be the most powerful document tracking systems in the Architecture/ Engineering/ Construction (AEC) industry.

Weekly and Monthly Reports – Providing Information for Discussion and Decision-Making

Another key communications task will be preparing weekly and monthly progress reports summarizing the status of the entire project.


Communication/Project Team Site

Communication between all project team members, contractors, and the public is critical for performing work in a safe, efficient, and non-disruptive manner. In addition to traditional communications methods, e.g. telephone conversations, face to-face meetings, e-mails, etc.,

Skanska is currently assisting the district in managing their Project Website (ahsbuilding.org) which serves the communications needs of the district and community at large. This website is and will continue to be populated with relevant links providing shortcuts to various types of reports. Real time access to critical information will enable interested parties to gather information and to make informed decisions and commitments. This tool will continue to increase savings in response time, improve the project schedule and maximize convenience and transparency for all stakeholders.


Arlington High School Schematic Design Binder IV-64

Designer's Work Plan

J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J

Schematic Design - MSBA Mod. 4

SD Submittal

MSBA Board Vote

Arlington Town Meeting Vote

Arlington Town Vote

AHSBC Meeting

Design Development

CMR Procurement

DD Submittal

Construction Documents

60% CD Submittal

90% CD Submittal

Early Bid Package 1 RAPS/relocate utilities/geo wells

Early Bid Package 2 foundations

EBP 1 and 2

Installation of Geothermal Wells

Filed Sub Bid Period & GMP

Phase 1 Building

Phase Close-out

Installation of Geothermal Wells

Abatement/ Demo

Phase 2 Building

Phase Close-out

Abatement/ Demo

Phase 3 Building

Phase Close-out

Abatement/ Demo

Phase 4 Site Development

Phase/Final Close-out

Project Completion

2023 2024 20252022Arlington High School

2019 2020 2021

Arlington High School Schematic Design BinderIV-65


ID ID Task Name Start

1 1 Module 1 - Eligibility Period Activity Wed 4/8/154 4 Module 2 - Forming the Project Team Wed 4/19/175 5 OPM Selection Wed 4/19/176 6 RFS Ad Appears Wed 4/19/177 7 Last Day for Questions from Respondents Mon 5/1/178 8 Responses Due Mon 5/8/179 9 Respondents Short-listed Mon 5/22/17

10 10 Interview Short-listed Respondents Wed 5/31/1711 11 Full Committee Vote on OPM Recommendation Wed 5/10/1712 12 Submit selection to MSBA Designer Selection Panel Wed 5/10/1713 13 Negotiate Fee w/ selected Respondent Thu 6/1/1714 14 MSBA Owner's Project Manager Review Panel Mon 7/10/1715 15 Execute Contract Tue 7/11/1716 16 Designer Selection Tue 8/8/1717 17 Develop RFS, Site Visit, Answer Questions, Etc. Tue 8/8/1718 18 Responses Due Tue 9/12/1719 19 Materials Received by the MSBA Tue 9/12/1720 20 DSP & Owner Review of Respondents Wed 9/13/1721 21 DSP Meeting to Review Respondents Mon 10/9/1722 22 DSP Meeting Interview Shortlist (If MSBA Required) Mon 10/16/1723 23 Execute Designer Contract & Submit to MSBA Tue 10/17/1724 24 Module 3 - Feasibility Study Mon 11/13/1725 25 Module 3.1 - Preliminary Design Program (PDP) Mon 11/13/1726 26 Project Kick-Off Meeting Mon 11/13/1727 27 PDP Submittal Development Tue 11/28/1728 28 SBC/SC - Approval of PDP Tue 4/24/1829 29 PDP Submittal Date to MSBA (8 weeks before PSR date) Tue 4/24/1830 30 MSBA Review of PDP Submission Wed 4/25/1831 31 Respond to MSBA PDP Comments Wed 6/6/1832 32 Module 3.2 - Preferred Schematic Report (PSR) Tue 4/24/1833 33 PSR Submittal Development Tue 4/24/1834 34 SBC/SC Approval of PSR Tue 7/10/1835 35 PSR Submittal Date to MSBA Wed 7/11/1836 36 Facility Assessment Subcommittee Meeting Wed 7/25/1837 37 Facility Assessment Subcommittee Meeting (Alt) Wed 8/8/1838 38 Address PSR Comments Wed 7/25/1839 39 MSBA Board Meeting - PSR Approval Wed 8/29/1840 40 Module 4 - Schematic Design (SD) Thu 8/30/1841 41 Schematic Design Development Thu 8/30/1842 42 AHSBC Meeting Tue 9/4/1843 43 AHSBC Meeting Mon 9/17/1844 44 September Community Forum Mon 9/24/1845 45 AHSBC Meeting Tue 10/2/1846 46 AHSBC Tue 10/16/1847 47 AHSBC Meeting Tue 11/6/1848 48 AHSBC Meeting Tue 11/20/18

Module 1 - Eligibility Period ActivityModule 2 - Forming the Project Team

OPM Selection4/195/15/85/22Interview Short-listed Respondents5/105/10Negotiate Fee w/ selected Respondent

7/107/11

Designer Selection Develop RFS, Site Visit, Answer Questions, Etc. 9/129/12DSP & Owner Review of Respondents10/910/16Execute Designer Contract & Submit to MSBA

Module 3 - Feasibility StudyModule 3.1 - Preliminary Design Program (PDP)

11/13

4/244/24MSBA Review of PDP SubmissionRespond to MSBA PDP Comments

7/107/117/25

Address PSR Comments8/29

Module 4 - Schematic Design (SD)

Qtr 2 Qtr 1 Qtr 4 Qtr 3 Qtr 2 Qtr 1 Qtr 4 Qtr 3 Qtr 2 Qtr 1 Qtr 4 Qtr 3 Qtr 2 Qtr 1 Qtr 4 Qtr 3 Qtr 2 Qtr 1 Qtr 4Half 1st Half 2nd Half 1st Half 2nd Half 1st Half 2nd Half 1st Half 2nd Half 1st Half

Task Milestone Summary Project Summary Manual Task Progress Manual Progress

Town of ArlingtonArlington High School

Arlington High SchoolTue 2/19/19



49 49 November Community Forum Wed 11/28/1850 50 AHSBC Meeting Tue 12/4/1851 51 AHSBC Meeting Tue 12/18/1852 52 AHSBC Meeting Tue 1/8/1953 53 January Community Forum - High School Tour Wed 1/9/1954 54 January Community Forum Mon 1/14/1955 55 Schematic Design Documents Available to Estimators Mon 1/14/1956 56 AHSBC Meeting Tue 1/22/1957 57 Estimates due Mon 1/28/1958 58 First Reconciliation Meeting (HMFH/Skanska) Tue 1/29/1959 59 AHSBC Meeting Tue 1/29/1960 60 Second reconciliation meeting and/or incorporate VE if necessary Wed 1/30/1961 61 Potential AHSBC Meeting – Further VE Discussion Thu 1/31/1962 62 AHSBC Meeting - SBC/SC Vote to Approve SD & Budget Tue 2/5/1963 63 SD Notification Email Sent to MSBA Wed 2/6/1964 64 AHSBC Meeting - SBC Vote to Approve SD & Budget Tue 2/12/1965 65 SD Submittal Date to MSBA Wed 2/20/1966 66 MSBA SD Review Wed 2/20/1967 67 Respond to SD Comments Thu 3/21/1968 68 MSBA/Town: Project Scope and Budget Conference /PS&B Agreement Wed 3/13/1969 69 PS&B MSBA Board Approval Wed 4/10/1970 70 MSBA Review of DESE Submittal Wed 2/20/1971 71 DESE Review and Approval Wed 3/13/1972 72 Town of Arlington - Estimated Override Vote (Date TBD) Tue 6/11/1973 73 Module 5 - Project Funding Agreement Wed 4/10/1974 74 Town Meeting/District Vote Ballot Quest.120 Days Tue 6/11/1975 75 Certificate of Vote Sent to the MSBA Fri 6/12/2076 76 Project Funding Agreement Sent Fri 7/10/2077 77 Project Funding Agreement Executed Mon 8/3/2078 78 Sustainable Design Building Milestones Wed 2/20/1979 79 Project Registration Wed 2/20/1980 80 Provisional Review Submittal (3 Months After Bidding) Thu 1/2/2081 81 Final Review Submission (3 Months After Substantial Completion) Mon 11/25/2482 82 CM Procurement Wed 2/20/1983 83 CM Application sent to Inspector General Office Wed 2/20/1984 84 Inspector General Office Review of Application Wed 2/20/1985 85 Advertise to Central Register Tue 5/14/1986 86 RFQ Available to CM Firms Tue 5/21/1987 87 Module 6 - Detailed Design & Bidding Wed 6/12/1988 88 AHSBC Meeting - Vote to Amend OPM and Design Contracts / Issue Tue 6/18/1989 89 AHSBC Meeting - CM Prequal subcommittee is appointed Tue 6/18/1990 90 Send Amended OPM and designer Contracts to MSBA Wed 6/19/1991 91 Schedule MSBA Kick-Off Meetings Tue 7/9/1992 92 Prequal Committee Review CM SOQs Wed 6/19/1993 93 SBC Approve shortlist of CM Firms Tue 7/9/1994 94 Issue RFP for CM at Risk Tue 7/9/19

1/9

Schematic Design Documents Available to Estimators

1/29

AHSBC Meeting - SBC/SC Vote to Approve SD & BudgetSD Notification Email Sent to MSBA

2/20MSBA SD ReviewRespond to SD Comments

PS&B MSBA Board ApprovalMSBA Review of DESE Submittal

DESE Review and Approval

Town Meeting/District Vote Ballot Quest.120 DaysCertificate of Vote Sent to the MSBAProject Funding Agreement SentProject Funding Agreement Executed







95 95 Prequal Committee Completes CM Interviews Mon 7/29/1996 96 SBC Approves Highest Ranked CM Firm Tue 7/30/1997 97 Negotiate with CM for Preconstruction and Construction Cont. Wed 7/31/1998 98 CM Contract Award for Preconstruction (FEE/GC) Mon 8/19/1999 99 Design Development (DD) Fri 10/18/19

100 100 80% DD Documents Fri 10/18/19101 101 80% Design Development (DD) Documents to Estimators Wed 11/13/19102 102 Cost Estimate/Reconciliation/VE if Required CM/AE Wed 11/13/19103 103 AHSBC vote to submit OR VE discussion Tue 11/19/19104 104 AHSBC vote to submit/VE approval (if necessary) Tue 11/26/19105 105 100% DD Submission Date to MSBA Thu 11/28/19106 106 MSBA DD review (21 days) Thu 11/28/19107 107 Address DD Review Comments (21 days) Thu 12/19/19108 108 60% Construction Documents ( 60% CD) Fri 11/29/19109 109 60% CD Documents Fri 11/29/19110 110 60% CD Documents Available to Estimators & CxA Mon 3/23/20111 111 Comments back from CM and Cx (2 weeks) Mon 3/23/20112 112 Early Bid Package 1 (RAPs, Utility Reroute, Reno Downs for Admin) Mon 4/6/20113 113 Estimates due Wed 4/15/20114 114 Cost Estimate/Reconciliation/VE if Required Thu 4/16/20115 115 AHSBC vote to submit 60% CD OR VE discussion Tue 4/21/20116 116 AHSCBC vote to submit/VE approval (if necessary) Tue 4/28/20117 117 60% CD Submission Date to MSBA Thu 4/30/20118 118 MSBA 60% CD Review Comments (21 days) Thu 4/30/20119 119 Address 60% Review Comments (21 days) Thu 5/21/20120 120 90% Construction Documents (90% CD's) Thu 4/30/20121 121 90% CD Documents Fri 4/10/20122 122 90% CD's Available for Estimators & CxA Fri 6/26/20123 123 Comments back from CM and Cx (2 weeks) Fri 6/26/20124 124 Estimates Due Wed 7/15/20125 125 Cost Estimate/Reconciliation/VE if Required Wed 7/15/20126 126 SBC - Authorize - 90% CD Submission to MSBA Tue 7/21/20127 127 AHSCBC vote to submit/VE approval (if necessary) Tue 7/28/20128 128 90% CD Submission Date to MSBA Thu 7/30/20129 129 MSBA 90% CD Review Comments (21 days) Fri 7/31/20130 130 Address 90% Review Comments (21 days) Fri 8/21/20131 131 100% Construction / Bid Documents Fri 6/26/20132 132 Develop 100% Construction Documents Mon 6/29/20133 133 Bid Documents Posted and Available Mon 9/7/20134 134 Prequalify Filed Sub Bidders (FSB) Thu 7/30/20135 135 Notice to Central Register Prequalifying FSB Mon 9/7/20136 136 Advertise RFQ for FSB Mon 9/14/20137 137 Filed Sub Bid RFQ Due Fri 9/18/20138 138 Prequalification Subcommittee Reviews Respondents Mon 9/21/20139 139 Notice to CR to Advertise RFQ for FSB (< 3 SOQs) Thu 9/24/20140 140 Advertise RFQ for FSB (<3 SOQ's) Fri 10/2/20

11/28MSBA DD review (21 days)Address DD Review Comments (21 days)

60% CD Documents60% CD Documents Available to Estimators & CxA

Cost Estimate/Reconciliation/VE if RequiredAHSBC vote to submit 60% CD OR VE discussion

4/30MSBA 60% CD Review Comments (21 days)Address 60% Review Comments (21 days)

90% CD Documents6/26

Cost Estimate/Reconciliation/VE if RequiredSBC - Authorize - 90% CD Submission to MSBA

90% CD Submission Date to MSBAMSBA 90% CD Review Comments (21 days)Address 90% Review Comments (21 days)

Develop 100% Construction DocumentsBid Documents Posted and Available

9/7Advertise RFQ for FSB 9/18Prequalification Subcommittee Reviews Respondents9/24Advertise RFQ for FSB (<3 SOQ's)







141 141 Post List of Qualified Bidders Fri 10/2/20142 142 Bidding (Main Package) Fri 10/2/20143 143 Notice to Central Register for FSB Bids Tue 10/13/20144 144 Bid Documents Available Wed 10/21/20145 145 FSB Walkthrough Wed 11/4/20146 146 Filed Sub Trade Bid Openings/Results Posted Wed 11/18/20147 147 CMR Bid Openings/Results Posted Wed 12/2/20148 148 Review Bid/Contract Negotiation Thu 12/3/20149 149 Execute GMP Thu 12/10/20150 150 Module 7 -Construction Wed 7/1/20151 151 Phase 1 Wed 7/1/20152 152 Phase 2 Sat 1/1/22153 153 Phase 3 Sat 7/1/23154 154 Move In/Training Thu 8/1/24155 155 Phase 4 (Site) Thu 8/1/24156 156 FINAL Commissioning Thu 8/1/24157 157 Project Completion Tue 4/1/25158 158 Module 8 - Closeout Mon 4/1/24159 159 LEED / CHPS Documentation Submission Mon 4/1/24160 160 Audit Mon 4/1/24

10/2

10/13Bid Documents Available 11/411/1812/2Review Bid/Contract Negotiation12/10

FINAL Commissioning4/1

LEED / CHPS Documentation SubmissionAudit






P. Local Action and Approval Letters

Local Action Approval Certification

Meeting Agendas and Meeting Minutes



Massachusetts School Building Authority Module 4 – Schematic Design - 4G-1 -

Appendix 4G Module 4 Local Actions and Approval Certification Template

February 20, 2019 Ms. Diane Sullivan Senior Capital Program Manager 40 Broad Street, Suite 500 Boston, Massachusetts 02109 Dear Ms. Sullivan: The Arlington High School Building Committee (“AHSBC”) has completed review of the Schematic Design Submittal for the Arlington High School project and voted to approve and authorize the OPM to submit the Schematic Design related submittals to the MSBA for consideration on February 19, 2019. A certified copy of the AHSBC meeting minutes, which includes the specific language of the vote and the number of votes in favor, opposed and abstained, are attached. The AHSBC held 33 meetings regarding the Arlington High School project since the MSBA Board of Directors approved the District to proceed into Schematic Design on August 29, 2018.

• Communications Subcommittee Meeting, Thursday, August 30, 2018 – 8:30 AM Location: Superintendent’s Office, Arlington High School

o Subcommittee discussed plans for upcoming community forums o Advocate Editorial Guest editorial written by Adam C, Kathy Bodie, and

Jeff T in Advocate. Final edits being made and will be published 9/6 o Subcommittee discussed plans for upcoming Town Day Booth (Town Day

Booth - Sept 15, 9:30am-3pm o Subcommittee discussed plans to update the project website

• AHSBC Meeting, Tuesday, September 4, 2018 – 6:00 PM

Location: School Committee Room, Arlington High School o Public Participation: The following town members spoke; Chris

Mungerast, Patricia Seitz, Patricia Worden, Carl Wagner, Grant Cook, Patrice Smith-supports rebuild-concerned with green space, would like to



preserve, Kristen Fritsch, Michael Delizi, Chris Loreti, Ian Goodsell and Ron Ellings

o MSBA Process Update: Chair, Jeff Thielman gave an over view of the process the committee took to arrive at the current building design. Jim Burrows, Skanska reviewed the MSBA timeline about outlines the important objectives of the Schematic Design Phase.

o Draft Traffic Study Report: The Traffic study was reviewed; various options were discussed.

o Draft Schematic Design Work: Lori Cowles HMFH reviewed the design process noting that currently we are in the concept design phase

• Communications Subcommittee Meeting, Tuesday, September 11, 2018 –

8:30 AM Location: Superintendent’s Office, Arlington High School o Subcommittee discussed plans for upcoming Town Day Booth (Town Day

Booth - Sept 15, 9:30am-3pm o Subcommittee discussed plans for upcoming Fall Community Forums:

Focus for September forum: site design/plan: traffic, use of front green and outdoor spaces, share schedule for exterior design development

Focus for October forum: exterior look and feel of building o Subcommittee discussed blog schedule o Subcommittee discusses process of updating the AHSBC with committee

emails received

• AHSBC Meeting, Tuesday, September 17, 2018 – 6:00 PM Location: School Committee Room, Arlington High School

o Public Participation: The following town members spoke; Patricia Worden, John Worden, Ian Goodsell, Greg Christiana, Len Kardon, keep in mind increasing enrollments. John Kohl, Carl Wagner – the SOHAHS, Rachel Stark and Ron Alex.

o MSBA Process Update: AHS Building Committee Chair, Jeff Thielman, read a statement to the committee and audience outlining the process and decisions made by the committee to date.

o A motion to reopen the design vote made by the AHS Building Committee on the Arlington High School design was made by John Cole and seconded by Sandy Pooler. Motion failed unanimously.

o Members of the committee spoke to the process upon which they made their final decision. Many initially were in favor of retaining the Collomb and Fusco buildings and the green frontage, but as the process evolved, voted what they believed was the best option. Members did note that they do have concerns with the estimated cost of the project and would continue to be diligent in monitoring the project budget.

o Accelerate Performance Program: Kim Cullinane of Eversource and Ben Heymer (via phone) of Seventhwave gave a presentation about the MASS Save collaborative and the Accelerate Performance Program.



o On a motion by Adam Chapdelaine seconded by Kate Lossian it was unanimously Voted to move forward with the Mass Save New Construction Program.

o Project Costs/Estimating Review: Jim Burrows (Skanska, Inc.) reviewed the project timeline and process flow chart.

o Site Design Presentation: Lori Cowles (HMF) presented; the Department of Public Works (DPW) site concepts, site circulation diagrams and site design opportunities presented by the landscape architect team from CSS.

• Communications Subcommittee Meeting, Wednesday, September 18, 2018 –

8:00 AM Location: Superintendent’s Office, Arlington High School o September 24 Forum Planning: Reviewed Forum Plan Draft o Community Outreach and Feedback Solicitation o Plans to make brief presentations at PTO meetings (all elementary

schools, Gibbs, Ottoson). AS will reach out to PTO presidents o Advocate - Schematic Design article published this week o Community forum flyers will be posted at pre-schools and community

bulletin boards around town o Motion to approve 7/18 and 9/11 meeting minutes by Kirsi Allison-Ampe.

2nd by T J Approved unanimously (5-0)

• Communications Subcommittee Meeting, Wednesday, September 26, 2018 – 8:30 AM Location: Superintendent’s Office, Arlington High School

o September Forum Debrief Strong message from participants who want to maintain a "park" or

open space in front Impression that community members walked away with greater

appreciation of the complexity of the whole project Presentations slides and summary of cost factors chart shared at

forum will be posted on website ACMI broadcast will be posted on website AS will write re-cap of forum as a blog post

o Community Outreach and Feedback Solicitation AS has reached out to all PTO's. Will share dates once all are

confirmed. True Story Theatre proposed Nov 7 to do improv performance with

a community dialogue on the front facade and green space. Town Meeting member tours to be scheduled in October/November followed by discussion with Building Committee

Plan for responding to social media/A-list posts is TBD. Skanska will respond to AHS building emails even as volume rises

o Move to approve 8/30/18 minutes, Approved unanimously, 4-0 o Move to approve 9/18/18 minute, Approved unanimously, 4-0



• AHSBC Meeting, Tuesday, October 2, 2018 – 6:00 PM Location: School Committee Room, Arlington High School

o Public Participation: The following town members spoke; Carl Wagner, Ron Alex, Grant Cook, Steve DeCourcey, Ian Goodsall

o Feasibility Study Budget Update: Jim Burrows reviewed the budget dashboard and updated the numbers by cost code.

o Design Update: HMFH presented green space design updates, Mass Ave. façade draft concepts, site plans, design diagrams and massing’s. HMFH also gave a presentation on the definition of “iconic” in architecture.

o Communications Subcommittee Report: The Subcommittee gave an update on the following planed events: November 5th Town Meeting Members will tour Arlington High School, followed by an information session in old hall, Question & Answer session at the Senior Center mid-day on November 10th or 17th, Speaking to PTO’s during October and November, True Story Theater will work the community on the AHS project on November 7th at the Thompson School, The AHS blog to address misconceptions on the project.

o Approval of Minutes: On a motion by Adam Chapdelaine seconded by Brian Rehrig it was unanimously. Voted to approve the meeting minutes of September 4, 2018. On a motion by Adam Chapdelaine seconded by Brian Rehrig it was unanimously Voted to approve the meeting minutes of September 17, 2018

o New Business: Town Manager Adam Chapdelaine reported that Minuteman

Technical is not interested in partnering with Arlington during the rebuild process.

HMFH is looking at the Parmenter School for housing non educational spaces.

Tentatively the comptroller’s offices will be housed at town hall, facilities and IT at DPW.

Discussed the timing of the debt exclusion and operating override there will be more clarity as the Long Term Planning Committee meets over the winter. The Select Board is the gatekeeper in making the decision on when the vote will take place.

The chair announced that there will be opportunity going forward for citizens input during the end of each meeting.

• Finance Subcommittee Meeting, Thursday October 4, 2018– 4:00 PM

Location: Manager’s Conference Room-Town Hall Annex o Invoice and Sub-consultant Review and Approval o Discussion: RE: Project Cost Estimating and Project Budget

• Communications Subcommittee Meeting, Thursday, October 11, 2018 – 8:30

AM – Location: Superintendent’s Office, Arlington High School o October Community Forum Planning



o Community Outreach Update o Move to approve 9/26/18 minutes, Approved unanimously, 3-0 o Amy Speare has written blog post on cost factors. Needs review before

going out. o Kirsi Allison Ampe working on a blog post about additional cost factors

• Sustainability/MEP Subcommittee Meeting, Thursday, October 11, 2018 –

2:30 PM – Location: AHS-School Committee Room, Arlington High School o Review Eversource Accelerate Performance Program MOU o Review Sustainability Goals Survey Responses

Strong desire for building to be connected to the outdoors Strong interest for net zero energy ready or net zero energy Strong desire to reduce water use by 30%

o Review Benchmarking Data and Preliminary Model Results o Discuss/Edit Project Performance Goals

• Sustainability/MEP Subcommittee Meeting, Monday, October 29, 2018 –

2:30 PM – Location: AHS-School Committee Room, Arlington High School o Finalize comfort requirements o Review OPR comments o Review and approve new draft of OPR and energy targets

Baseline: 38 (all electric), 48 (primarily gas heat). This is the minimum for participating in the Accelerate Performance program

Target 30 (all electric), 40 (primarily gas heat). This is what we will be trying to achieve.

• Communications Subcommittee Meeting, Tuesday, October 30, 2018 – 8:30

AM Location: AHS-School Committee Room, Arlington High School o November 5 Town Meeting Member and Info Session:

Letter and email invite has gone out from Adam Chapdelaine to Town Meeting

Two sections of night: 35-40-minute tour followed by info session o Community Outreach Update

Town Hall Bulletin Board is reserved Jan/Feb 2018 for Black History Month. JR will find out if board can be shared.

TJ met with Commission for Arts and Culture - they will email committee about desire to incorporate public art into front green and facade.

o Communication Calendars/Blog Post Second cost factors blog being written by Kirsi-Allison Ampe Blog about preschool being written by Jane Morgan Shannon Knuth and Kent Werst will write a blog about how great

the new school will be from a teacher’s perspective o Motion to approve 10/18/18 minutes, Approved unanimously, 5-0



• AHSBC Meeting, Tuesday, November 6, 2018 – 6:00 PM Location: School Committee Room, Arlington High School

o Public Participation: The following town members spoke; John Leonard, Rachel Starks, Leba Heigham, LEba Heigham, Chris Loreti, Carl Wagner, Sophie Borksten and Grant Cook.

o Approval of Minutes: On a motion by Adam Chapdelaine seconded by Brian Rehrig it was unanimously. Voted to approve the meeting minutes of September 4, 2018. On a motion by Adam Chapdelaine seconded by Brian Rehrig it was unanimously Voted to approve the meeting minutes of September 17, 2018

o SMEP Subcommittee Presentation: Ben Heymer from Seventhwave via Skype, Brendan Giza-Sisson from Eversource, Fran Boucher from National Grid, Nathaniel Dick from Eversource, Sean McGloin from National Grid. Presented: A Review of Proposed Energy Performance Targets for the New AHS

o On a motion by Daniel Ruiz seconded by Brian Rehrig it was unanimously: Voted to accept the Accelerated Performance Program as a basis for the committees’ work ahead.

o HMFH Update: HMFH presented site design progress. Site Plan 1 – allowed for

240 parking spaces and a regulation baseball field. Site Plan 2 – provided for another practice field, but only provides for 154 parking spaces. The committee agreed that all options should be explored. The Town Manager proposed that we move forward with site plan 1 to allow more time for cost analysis and exploration.

Courtyard Light Study: Reviewed the Courtyard Light Study – Existing average light levels throughout the year and the

Proposed Courtyard Light levels which will be comparable to the existing.

Historic Study Use: Presented an amphitheater concept that incorporates the front columns and façade of the high school, An option that uses the columns in the auditorium itself and an option that incorporates the Fusco House façade into the .black box theater.

Central Spine Use Concepts HMFH presented an overview of the central spine concepts that showed: The D-Lab, main entry, the lobby arty gallery, green roof, cafeteria forum stairs and learning commons.

o Approval of Minutes: On a motion by Adam Chapdelaine seconded by Kate Loosian it was unanimously: Voted to approve the meeting minutes of October 2, 2018. On a motion by Adam Chapdelaine seconded by Kate Loosian it was unanimously: Voted to approve the meeting minutes of October 16, 2018.

•



• Finance Subcommittee Meeting, Thursday November 8, 2018– 4:00 PM Location: Manager’s Conference Room-Town Hall Annex

o Review Updated Budget Projections o Review Cost Impacts of Options Presented by HMFH o Discuss Potential Budget Reduction Strategies

• Communications Subcommittee Meeting, Wednesday, November 14, 2018 –

3:00 PM Location: Superintendent’s Office, Arlington High School o Planning November 27 and future forums

Survey will be released before forum and will be open for a week. Kirsi-Allison Ampe and Amy Speare will work on developing survey.

Community Outreach update and planning Process for tracking and responding to Emails: Formal process is

now in place for responding to ahsbuilding emails. Emails are going to Skanska to respond.

Approval of 10/30/18 meeting minutes

• AHSBC Meeting, Tuesday, November 20, 2018 – 6:00 PM Location: School Committee Room, Arlington High School

o Public Participation: The following town members spoke; Carl Wagner, Ted Peluso, Ron Alex

o Estimated Schedule Update: Jim Burrows of Skanska updated the schematic design estimate schedule by a week stating that it must be

o submitted to MSBA ten business days before deadline. The change will require an email submission to MSBA by February 6. The updated schedule includes adding meetings on January 29th and 31st if needed.

o Exterior Design Review: Lori Cowles of HMFH reviewed Parti = the general scheme of an architectural design floor plans and topography. Lori Cowles of HMFH informed the committee that the three designs to be presented reflect feedback from the committee on the exterior design. The central spine does not change in any of the options.

o Traffic Update: Lori Cowles has reached out the Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC) to meet to discuss their Traffic Impact Analysis report for the high school project. The committee agreed that doing an analysis of what mitigation will be necessary at the Grove Street/DPW site is a warranted expense. On a motion by John Cole seconded by Frank Callahan it was

unanimously: Voted to maintain the ability for a vehicular outlet to allow access from the high school site to Grove Street through the DPW.

o Memorials Committee: Chairman Jeff Thielman informed the committee that he would like to establish a memorials subcommittee to inventory items on the high school site that need to be preserved.



So Voted, moved by Adam Chapdelaine seconded Judson Peirce. Assistant Principal Bill McCarthy will chair the committee with appointees by the Veterans Committee and the Select Board.

o Jim Burrows, Skanska, reviewed the Value Engineering document that outlined current and potential savings as well as: Accepted VE items – Comptroller and Facilities. VE Items under review – IT Network and offices and Payroll

Department. Items for Consideration if estimates required – square footage and

sample building VE items Incremental estimates will be broken out. The subcommittee will further develop and review the items.

o On a motion by Brian Rehrig seconded by Adam Chapdelaine it was unanimously: Voted to approve the meeting minutes of November 6, 2018. 1,442 respondents, 3% responded at the forum, 97% online, 26 % attended the forum or watched on ACMI, includes 57 teachers and 55 students.

• Communications Subcommittee Meeting, Monday, November 26, 2018 – 8:30

AM Location: Superintendent’s Office, Arlington High School o Nov 27 forum planning:

Survey reviewed and edited. Survey opens 11/27 and closes at 8pm on 12/2. Survey results will be analyzed in time to present to Building Committee on 12/4

o Community Survey Discussion: Forum postponed from Nov 27. Messages will go out on school

and town email lists, Patch, Arlington list, Facebook, websites, and Mailchimp

Survey reviewed and edited. Survey opens 11/27 and closes at 8pm on 12/2. Survey results will be analyzed in time to present to Building Committee on 12/4

11/28 forum plan was reviewed. o Community Outreach planning:

Gibbs - Dec 13 Ottoson - Dec 14 Dallin - Nov 30 Thompson - Dec 7

o Approval of 10/30/18 and 11/14/18 Meeting Minutes Motion to approve meeting minutes from 10/30/18 and 11/14/18

Motion by JD, 2nd by KAA. Approved 5-0

• Finance Subcommittee Meeting, Thursday November 29, 2018– 4:00 PM Location: Manager’s Conference Room-Town Hall Annex

o Continued Discussion on Updated Budget Projections o Discussion/Cost Impacts of Options Presented by HMFH



o Discuss Potential Budget Reduction Strategies o Other Business

• AHSBC Meeting, Tuesday, December 4, 2018 – 6:00 PM

Location: School Committee Room, Arlington High School o Public Participation: The following town members spoke; Gordon

Jamieson, Eri Ammondson, Elizabeth Terry, Topher Heigham, Mustafa o Amy Speare and Kirsi Allison-Ampe reported on the Community

Feedback on Schematic Design Concepts. Positive about Option A, Neutral about Options B & C.

o Exterior Design Direction Decision: Lori Cowles of HMFH presented to the committee. The committee discussed at length the three options, each committee member shared their opinions about the exterior design options, highlighting elements they liked and disliked about each concept. After considering their own opinions and those of the community, the committee directed HMFH to pursue Option A, with the stipulation that more work needs to be done. While recognizing the community's desire for a traditional/historic facade, the committee requested modifications of the entrance (potentially including the columns and arches) to make the entrance more welcoming to students.

o CM at Risk Presentation: Jim Burrows of Skanska gave an overview of the CM at Risk presentation that explained: Construction Delivery Methods Defined Design—Bid—Build vs. CM at Risk The CM at Risk Advantage CM at Risk Procurement Process

o On a motion by Daniel Ruiz seconded by Sandy Pooler it was unanimously: Voted that the AHS Building Committee directs Skanska, Inc. to notify the Inspector General's office of our intent to enter into a contract with a construction management at risk film.

o Finance Subcommittee Update o Town Manager Adam Chapdelaine reported that the subcommittee

continues to work on value engineering to identify cost saving items. The Comptroller's office and Facilities Department are expected to move to Department of Public Works with a cost savings of $4 million. The finance and communications subcommittees will work together to further refine the VE list. The Town Manager will work to finalize the apples to apples comparisons for Waltham, Somerville and Belmont high school.

o Approval of Minutes: On a motion by Adam Chapdelaine seconded by Frank Callahan it was unanimously: Voted to approve the meeting minutes of November 20, 2018.

• Finance Subcommittee Meeting, Thursday December 6, 2018 – 4:00 PM

Location: Manager’s Conference Room-Town Hall Annex o Budget Update



o Project Benchmarking Discussion o VE Discussion o Project Budget Items For Communications Sub-committee

• Sustainability/MEP Subcommittee Meeting, Monday, December 10, 2018 –

2:30 PM – Location: AHS-School Committee Room, Arlington High School o Review energy modeling assumptions o Discuss non-energy sustainability features

• AHSBC Meeting, Tuesday, December 18, 2018 – 6:00 PM

Location: School Committee Room, Arlington High School o Public Participation: The following town members spoke; Leba Heigham,

Carl Wagner, Ted Peluso, Elizabeth Terry o Schematic Design: Floor plan progress – developing floor plans were

presented to the committee o Site Design Direction Decision: Lori Cowles presented two site design

options to the committee. Plan A provides for 254 parking spaces including the location of play areas for the preschool and daycare. Plan B reduces parking to 227 parking spaces and allows for more green but would mean the preschool daycare play structure would be located across the street. The committee discussed both options in response to questions relative to the elimination of the basketball courts. Concerns over the preschool and daycare drop off and play structure being across the street in option B were also discussed. The decision will be left to the preschool director. As to whether there will be access to AHS from Grove Street or the installation of a light at Mill Street, Lori Cowles reported that they will meet with the Transportation Advisory Committee and pursue further analysis before making a recommendation. On a motion by John Cole, seconded by Matthew Janger it was

unanimously: Voted to support Arlington High School Site Plan B presented by HMFH that includes 227 parking spaces and offers optimal field space.

o Security Design Progress: Lori Cowles explained that the security team met and discussed the following: smart security cameras –for exterior with thermal imaging, video surveillance –monitoring by exception, exterior coverage: fields, parking, building perimeter interior coverage: corridors, stairs, large spaces, access control: entry vestibule, card access, student ID card, video intercom

o Emergency Generator: The generator is for emergency use not emergency “shelter” The generator includes: emergency lighting, exit signs, fire alarm, telephone equipment, security system, IT equipment, kitchen walk-ins. Emergency use includes: lighting, ventilation, outlets in athletics wing/cafeteria/ kitchen/ main spine/lobby



o Geotechnical/geo-environmental update: Lori reported that pre-characterization of soil and further existing foundation work is ongoing. Crews will be back on-site during school break.

o Finance Subcommittee Update – VE Discussion Continued: The subcommittee continues to have ongoing conversations on VE items, incremental reductions have been added. Discussion included: Adam Chapdelaine will meet with the DPW Director informing

him that the IT Department will definitely be moving to the DPW. All of the items on the VE list were in the educational plan voted

on by this committee. The School Committee is not interested in making any

recommendations at this point and will be discussing the project during the next few meetings.

The Town Manager has authorized a space study of the Parmenter School.

o Approval of Minutes: On a motion by Kate Loosian, seconded by Adam Chapdelaine it was unanimously Voted to approve the meeting minutes of December 4, 2018.

• Communications Subcommittee Meeting, Thursday, December 20, 2018 –

2:00 PM Location: Superintendent’s Office, Arlington High School o January 14th Forum Planning o Development of Cost and Budget Materials & Blogs o Approval Meeting Minutes: Motion to approve meeting minutes from

11/26/18, Approved 5-0

• Communications Subcommittee Meeting, Thursday, January 8, 2019 – 8:30 AM – Location: Superintendent’s Office, Arlington High School

o January 14 forum planning o January/February community outreach o Approve meeting minutes from 12/20/18

• AHSBC Meeting, Tuesday, January 8, 2019 – 6:00 PM

Location: School Committee Room, Arlington High School o Chair Jeff Thielman welcomed to the committee Michael Mason, newly

appointed Chief Financial Officer for Arlington Public Schools. o Public Participation: The following town members spoke; Gordon

Jameison o “Other” Program Updates: As requested, Lori Cowles, presented a space

and cost analysis of the Parmenter School to house Menotomy Preschool temporarily during high school construction only and then permanently and in addition to show costs to house District Administration Offices permanently there. Three options were presented to house the preschool temporarily, all options have space program deficits of undersized classrooms and toilets:



Option 1 without an elevator = $1,858,523 Option 1A with an inside elevator = $2,758,998 Option 1B with an outside elevator = $2,948,973 Total project cost for permanent placement would be $13,125,000 District Offices permanently placed at Parmenter will cost

approximately $9,000,000 versus the approximate cost of $7,000,000 to remain as part of the high school project. This option does not provide enough space for the school committee conference room 1,000 square feet versus the current 1,500 square feet, provides no parking and the Town will lose the space as rental income.

o On a motion by John Cole seconded by Kate Loosian it was moved o That the AHS Building Committee direct the architect (HMFH) to proceed

with option 1A for the temporary relocation of Menotomy Preschool during construction, further that the building committee set aside further discussion of moving district administration offices to the Parmenter school. Amended by Kirsi Allison-Ampe that Menotomy Preschool will not be placed permanently at the Parmenter School. Unanimous vote.

o Voted to request that Skanska will create a document that shows the costs of modulars for Menotomy Preschool vs renovation of the Parmenter School.

o Civil Site Design Progress: Arthur Duffy of HMFH presented the Site Utilities plans for Phases one through four identifying the required utility work during each phase (i.e. new water and gas, science water and sewer lines). He also gave a geo-environmental update that identified geothermal well locations on the site.

o Phasing/ Temporary Use Progress: Lori Cowles presented to the committee the preliminary phasing plans.

o Interior Core Spaces Presentation: Melissa Greene (HMFH) presented interior core spaces of the STEAM Wing and the Performing Arts and Athletic Wings.

o Finance Subcommittee Update – VE Discussion Continued: Jim Burrows, Skanska, presented the MSBA Project Benchmark

document that showed and compared the scale, scope, schedule, complexity, cost per square foot and per pupil costs with Waltham, Belmont, Saugus and Somerville projects that equals an apple to apple comparison.

Skanska and HMFH will meet on January 29th to reconcile the estimates, there will be any VE decisions made at that time. The building committee will meet the evening of the 29th to review the estimates for the first time.

o On a motion by Adam Chapdelaine seconded by Frank Callahan it was: Voted to approve the meeting minutes of December 18, 2018 (abstention by Daniel Ruiz).



• Finance Subcommittee Meeting, Tuesday, January 22, 2019 – 5:00 PM Location: School Committee Room, Arlington High School

o Review MSBA 3011 Total Project Budget o Discussion of Cost Estimation Process o Discussion of Value Engineering o Updates Parmenter Analysis – Cost Factors

Adam Chapdelaine asks Skanska to distribute a revised analysis of the Parmenter costs to address the soft cost issues


Location: School Committee Room, Arlington High School o HMFH Exterior Design Review: HMFH gives an overview of design

progress and explains that they are perusing Option A with a more traditional feel to it. HMFH shares 6 concepts.

o VOTE: Committee votes on position (rotated or straight) of the arts wing (red or yellow perimeter drawing): All vote for rotated. Kathy Bodie voted for straight.

o Committee discussed the prominence of D-Lab on the front façade. o Jeff asks committee to rank their top two concepts. Concept 2 has the

majority. o MOTION Adam Chapdelaine moves to direct the architect develop

scheme 2 with direction from John Cole to extend the second story entrance. Seconded by Kate Loosian. All those in favor to adopt the motions proposed by John Cole.

o Vote to approve the adoption of the motion: In Favor: 11, Opposed (2) – Kathy Bodie, Matt Janger, Abstain (1) – William McCarthy.

o Finance Subcommittee Update: AHSBC Reviews the “Updated Parmenter Analysis – Cost Factors

o Kirsi moves to reaffirm the vote of the AHSBC to keep the preschool permanently at the High School.

o Kirsi see’s it as important to keep it the Preschool at the High School because relocating to Parmenter would short change the community, also, the adjacency for the Early Childhood program is important for the high school students and if we build the space as part of this project, we could use it in the future to accommodate future enrollment growth. Motion is seconded by Kate. Jeff asked the committee for a roll-call vote: All in favor say I, the I’s are unanimous.

o DWP Project Update: Adam gives an update on the DWP Project Design o Sustainability/MEP Subcommittee Update: Ryan gives preliminary results

from the energy model effort. The goal EUI baseline target: 38 with the hopes to get to 30. The preliminary model gets us to 36, so we already meet our baseline target.

o Communications Subcommittee: Jeff suggests we do road-show presentations to different town committees: Select board



Finance Committee Town Meeting Committee


Location: School Committee Room, Arlington High School o Public Participation: The following town members spoke; Michael DeLisi,

Laura Notman. o Cost Estimate Review: Jim Burrows, Skanska project manager, reviewed

the cost estimates and informed the committee that the summary project total was $299 million, that includes $243 million in construction costs, $11 million for Owner’s and Construction contingencies and $14 million for Design contingency. The next step will be to place the numbers into MSBA’s 3011 form with some tweaks.

o Lori Cowles HMFH, presented a list of items priced separately as per the committees’ request. Three items on the list are labeled as ‘out: Under Site Amenities turf fields – cost above cost of grass

$1,130,264 Under Net Zero/Mechanical – VRF (with partial geothermal)

Savings over base design (3,738,730) Under Premium for Historic Reuse – refabricate new Collomb

façade at large courtyard in phase 2 at a cost of $2,466,000.

o The Committee had extensive discussion about site amenities o The Committee discussed at length the project cost and their responsibility

to the voters at looking at VE items in order to reduce the project budget to somewhere between $285 - $295 million. The committee agreed that any reduction in total budget would not come from the educational program.

o On a motion by John Cole seconded by Kate Loosian it was: o Voted to direct HMFH and Skanska to prepare a report of value

engineering recommendations that would reduce the total project cost to $290 million without touching the educational program. Motion passes 11 yes 4 no 1 abstention (Kathy Bodie, Jeff Thielman, Michael Mason, and Judson Pierce with no votes) (Matt Janger Abstained).

o School Committee will review the VE list at their meeting on January 30th and will respond to the building committee with any recommendations for the building committee meeting scheduled on January 31st.

o Approval of Minutes: On a motion by Adam Chapdelaine seconded by Tobey Jackson it was: Voted to approve the meeting minutes of January 8 and 22, 2018

• AHSBC Meeting, Thursday, January 31, 2019 – 6:00 PM

Location: School Committee Room, Arlington High School o Public Participation: The following town members spoke; Gordon

Jamieson, Michael DeLisi, Laura Notman., Peter.



o Lori Cowles reviewed the responses to questions raised at Tuesday’s meeting per the attached memo.

o The Committee went through each VE item individually in the sheet marked "Potential VE Items” and was allowed five minutes of discussion on each. Committee members can vote to remove a VE item.

o After discussion the committee took a straw vote (non-binding) on each item.

o Skanska tabulated the votes (visible on screen), the majority vote for any item will reflect on the spreadsheet will tabulate the savings.

o Subtotal of the items votes to remove from the project above: $8,979,866 o There was a motion to table discussion (motion failed) of the payroll

department location, currently payroll is in the estimates and in the floor plans (mezzanine level between preschool and district offices). Supt. Bodie and the Town Manager will continue to discuss the location and report out at the next meeting.

o School Committee Report o Chair of the School Committee Kirsi Allison-Ampe reported that the

school committee met and agreed that no educational program items be omitted from the project. The Committee, (per request of the AHS Building Committee) created a rank order if additional cuts must be made.

1. Move Payroll out of the High School 2. Reduce the size of Menotomy Preschool Classrooms 3. Reduce the size of the Chorus classroom 4. Reduce the size of the Black Box Theatre 5. Reduce the size of the LABBB program space

o On a motion by Kate Loosian seconded by Daniel Ruiz it was unanimously: Voted to adjourn @ 9:30 pm.

• AHSBC Meeting, Tuesday, February 5, 2019 – 6:00 PM Location: School Committee Room, Arlington High School

o Public Participation: The following town members spoke; Michael DeLisi, Al Tosti and Rob Spiegel.

o Mr. Thielman reviewed the process for tonight’s meeting. Mr. Callahan requested a 20 minutes recess to review materials received late this afternoon.

o Design Update: Melissa Greene, HMFH, described the latest version of the exterior design for AHS and displayed a "working model" on a screen that showed building materials, canopies and vestibules.

o MSBA 3011 – Soft Costs: Jim Burrows of Skanska reviewed soft costs and revised the estimates per his handout that shows:



Total Project Budget: All costs associates with the project are subject to 963 CMR 2.16(5)

Estimated Budget

Feasibility Study $2,000,000

Legal Fees $100,000

Owner’s Project Manager (3.5%) $7,888,697

Basic Services (9.5%) 21,006,499

Reimbursable Services $2,385,000

CMR Preconstruction Services $500,000

Construction Budget $235,187,903

Misc. Project Costs $4,098,198

FF&E and Technology $8,073,000

Owner’s Contingency (1%) $2,351,879

Construction Contingency (3%) $7,055,637

Project Budget $290,646,813

*20% Cap on Soft Costs

o The above does not include payroll costs. o Jim also reviewed the MSBA Guidelines for Reimbursement that covers

Site Costs that are: Eligible Site Costs Categorially Ineligible Site Costs Potentially Ineligible Site Costs.

o Lori Cowles, HMFH, reported to the committee that: The review of the proposed artificial turf layout which

accommodates softball field overlay and baseball with a practice field overlay, neither overlay overlap with the pitchers area/mound. The entire field will be turf, it works, it is safe and for baseball a portable pitching mound may be used. The fields can be used for sub varsity games, not varsity by 5 feet, HMFH will check to see if they can be expanded by that amount.

Lighting is not in the project budget, it would cost $1,300,000. The Committee was in favor of lights sighting the growing need to have usable space/fields in town.

o Cost Estimate Discussion: Supt. Bodie informed the Committee that she is willing to let go of the current proposal to place the payroll department in the mezzanine area , however, payroll will remain in district offices. The current district floor plans will be redone to include the payroll office, storage is okay to move off site.



o On a motion by Sandy Pooler seconded by Daniel Ruiz it was unanimously: Voted to reaffirm all votes taken on the VE items at the January 31st meeting separating any that warrant a separate vote.

o On a motion by Sandy Pooler seconded by Daniel Ruiz it was: Voted to approve item A simplify amphitheater design. 17 in favor 1 opposed Jud Pierce.

o On a motion by Sandy Pooler seconded by Daniel Ruiz it was unanimously: Voted to approve item B simplify the Minuteman bike ramp.

o On a motion by Sandy Pooler seconded by Brian Rehrig and amended by Kirsi Allison-Ampe it was unanimously voted :item H Remove the funding for the restoration and reuse of the Collomb House facade and add $200,000 for an artistic commemoration of Collomb House or other historical reuse and arts installation.

o On a motion by Sandy Pooler seconded by Brian Rehrig on item I ‘Salvage, repair, store and reinstall Old Hall proscenium, motion fails 12 no votes, 6 yes votes.

o On a motion by Ryan Katofsky seconded by Kate Loosian it was Voted to Reduce 30% of copper siding to brick veneer (item L). 16 yes, 1 no (J. Pierce) 1 abstention (Steve Nesterak).

o On a motion by Kirsi Allison-Ampe seconded by Brian Rehrig it was unanimously: Voted the reduction of square feet and retaining the payroll department at the high school (item Y).

o On a motion by Brian Rehrig seconded by Adam Chapdelaine it was: Voted to accept item X the addition of the athletic field lights. 13 yes, 4 no 1 abstention.

o On a motion by Brian Rehrig seconded by Kirsi Allison-Ampe it was Voted to authorize SKANSKA USA BUILDING, INC. to submit the Schematic Design Submittal Notification to the Massachusetts School Building Authority with a total approximate project cost of $291,000,000.00 on behalf of the Arlington Building Committee on or before February 6, 2019. Unanimous vote.

o Roll Call: Jeff Thielman - yes Kathleen Bodie - yes Adam Chapdelaine - yes Kirsi Allison-Ampe – yes Francis Callahan - yes John Cole, Chair – yes Tobey Jackson – yes Matthew Janger – yes Ryan Katofsky – yes Kate Loosian – yes Michael Mason - yes William McCarthy – yes



Steve Nesterak – yes Judson Pierce – yes Sandy Pooler – yes Brian Rehrig – yes Daniel Ruiz – yes Amy Speare – yes

o Approval of Minutes: On a motion by Adam Chapdelaine and seconded by Kate Loosian it was unanimously: Voted to approve the meeting minutes of January 29 & 31, 2019

o New Business: Next agenda will have the formal estimate and the full Schematic Design package to be voted by the committee for submission to MSBA and communication needs for the committee moving forward (i.e. receiving materials 24 hours before the meeting and transparency.

• Finance Subcommittee Meeting, Thursday February 7, 2019 – 4:00 PM

Location: Manager’s Conference Room-Town Hall Annex o Review MSBA 3011 o Approval of Minutes:

Minutes from the 10/4/18, 12/6/18, 12/18/19 and 1/22/19 meetings were approved unanimously

• Communications Subcommittee Meeting, Monday February 11, 2019 – 8:30

AM Location: Superintendent’s Office, Arlington High School o Community Outreach Efforts (Robbins Library table, PTOs, Senior

Center) o Future Blog and Website Content Discussion o April event for Town Meeting

• AHSBC Meeting (Snow Date), Tuesday, February 12, 2019 – 6:00 PM

Location: School Committee Room, Arlington High School MEETING POSTPOSTED TO 2/19/19 DUE TO WEATHER

• AHSBC Meeting (Snow Date), Tuesday, February 19, 2019 – 6:00 PM Location: School Committee Room, Arlington High School



In addition to the AHSBC meetings listed above, the District held 9 public meetings, which were posted in compliance with the Open Meeting Law, at which the Arlington High School project was discussed.

• Community Forum, Monday, September 24, 2019 – 7:00 PM Location: Arlington Town Hall

o At the forum, AHS Building Committee Chair Jeff Thielman provided an in-depth overview of the project so far: Reminding the community that the current high school is more

than only a place to educate our youth and that it also houses Town/School offices, Menotomy Preschool and the LABBB Special Education Collaborative.

Observing that through all of the conversations occurring around town about the project, “One thing that is very clear is that Arlington is united in a collective desire to create a better educational space for our high school students as soon as we possibly can.”

Recapping the history of the project Sharing the district’s educational vision that addresses the student

experience at Arlington High School, and how it will change with a brand-new facility.

Reminding people why, after carefully weighing the trade-offs for all of the options, the Building Committee selected an all-new design concept.

Describing what to expect during the Schematic Design phase and reminding everyone that the design of the new facility has not yet been created.

Summarizing cost factors of this project, including the desire to make the building as sustainable as possible, and unique site conditions.

• Community Forum, Wednesday, November 28, 2019 – 7:00 PM

Location: Arlington Town Hall o At the forum, AHS Building Committee Chair Jeff Thielman provided an

in-depth overview of the project so far: Reminding the community that the current high school is more

than only a place to educate our youth and that it also houses Town/School offices, Menotomy Preschool and the LABBB Special Education Collaborative.

Showed images of the conditions at the existing Arlington High School

Recapping the history of the project Described the educational vision



Described why the design concept was selected Explained the MSBA Schematic Design process Gave an update on the Sustainability Design Described the proposed Construction Timeline Reviewed the Project Cost Reviewed Frequently Asked Questions

o Lori Cowels, HMFH, provided an in-depth overview Schematic Design Plan Development: Site Plan Site features Traffic Plan Interior Development Options for Reuse of Historic Elements Mass Ave. Exterior Design Concepts

• School Committee Meeting, Thursday, November 29, 2018 – 6:30 PM

Location: School Committee Room, Arlington High School o Dr. Bodie provided the overview of the very successful AHS Building

Forum presentations made by Mr. Thielman and Ms. Cowles at Town Hall on Wednesday, November 28th. Dr. Bodie explained the facility concept designs, the MSBA process and said the Education Vision plan that was submitted to the MSBA is what drove this project and that it was the best MSBA has ever seen. Dr. Bodie stated we are currently in the second phase of the AHS Building project, which is the Schematic Design phase, and then the next two phases will be the Design Development and Construction Drawings phase. The plan is to begin construction in the summer of 2020. The cost of the plan could total $308 million, of which $238 million is for the high school and $70 million is for programs that need to remain at the high school and are mandated. Dr. Bodie said in order for us to move forward the community needs to come together on this project. The Traffic Advisory Committee is reviewing the impact on traffic around the high school and Dr. Bodie would like the committee to discuss having a larger auditorium, gymnasium and adding an indoor track and discuss the educational spaces and Special Education Preschool program at our next School Committee meeting, on Thursday, December 13.

• School Committee Meeting, Thursday, December 13, 2018 – 6:30 PM Location: School Committee Room, Arlington High School

o Discussion of Value Engineer Areas of AHS Discussion of Value Engineer Areas of AHS Dr. Allison-Ampe asked Dr. Janger to explain the implications of

cuts on the AHS auditorium and gym for the Value of Engineer areas of Arlington High School. Dr. Janger explained that the details gone into this report, go back to the educational program



and all of this was in there to make the space larger. The additional space is needed to hold more students and functionally for him for programming for all of our school events, chorus, town concerts, gym classes and programs for graduation.

Mr. Hayner commend Dr. Janger and those on the AHS Building Committee and supports the additional spaces needed 100 percent. Mr. Schlichtman and Mr. Kardon also support the additional space since we have outstanding programs, our intent is to have a better quality facility and we should not go backwards. It would be impossible to add onto these areas later if needed, so they support the additional space. The committee appreciates this being added to their agenda for discussion.

• School Committee Meeting, Thursday, December 20, 2018 – 6:30 PM

Location: School Committee Room, Arlington High School o Discussion of Value Engineering for new AHS:

Kathleen Bodie shares a letter from the Arlington High School Building Committee Chair Jeff Thielman. Jeff Thielman is present to speak with the School Committee

Dr. Allison-Ampe presented draft version the cost trade-off analysis that was included in Novus. She reviewed the Estimate timeline

• Estimates on 28th • Reconciled on 29th. Building committee meets. • 31st - possible 2nd building committee meeting • Feb. 5 - Building committee meets to approve total project

budget. • Feb 12 - approve submission of schematic design of report.

Will have to provide information in advance of knowing if there need to be any cuts. Propose:

• 3 different sets of discussions. Tonight - what is recommendation assuming we do not need to reduce square footage.

• Jan. 14 - Dr. Janger and Dr. Bodie work together to create two proposals.

• One to save 3-5 million; another to save 6-10 million. Figure out numbers later. Hear proposals from Dr. Janger and Dr. Bodie. Then vote to accept it. Then passed off to building committee.

Jeff spoke to the Committee - look at this as all that is in building is result of well thought out educational plan. There is no fluff. We have as a committee pushed for larger spaces because we believe enrollment will be larger than 1755. Need to make cuts that are educationally sound. Committee should be involved in value engineering. We do not want to make any reductions. We



want the building to be as large as possible. if the estimates come in over a total project budget of 308 million, we have to make reductions. If motion is made at building committee to limit cost, we may have to make reductions. Ultimate authority is building committee. Building committee wants input from District leadership. Should happen with SC buy-in and District admin. Want alignment.

Mr. Hayner motion to authorize Dr. Allison-Ampe and Mr. Schlichtman to write to write letter to building committee, seconded by Ms. Morgan. Voted: 7-0 unanimous.

• School Committee Meeting, Thursday, January 10, 2019 – 6:30 PM

Location: School Committee Room, Arlington High School o Discussion of Value Engineering for new AHS

The School Committee sent a follow up letter to Mr. Thielman, Chair of the AHSBC in support of Menotomy Preschool.

The committee members discussed the plans for Preschool classrooms at the Parmenter and it was determined that they could fit temporarily but cannot fit permanently. Members did not understand how it couldn’t fit even if we moved out ACC. The plans for the Menotomy Preschool to go into Parmenter was presented. The classroom sizes, number of students with TA’s, teachers, rest room sizes, and square footage were discussed. Mr. Thielman did say that to put Menotomy Preschool at Parmenter it will be more expensive than keeping it at the high school.

Mr. Thielman provided and update from the AHSBC and informed the School Committee members that the municipal offices of the Comptroller, IT and Facilities will be moved to new DPW offices. The phase site of the district offices were explained and the AHS Building committee voted on Tuesday to keep Menotomy Preschool and District Offices in the AHS plan.

The committee discussed phasing and location of Administration during construction

Dr. Ampe spoke on the letter written to AHS Building Committee and said she suggested a joint meeting on Wednesday, January 30th with the AHS Building Committee and the School Committee to discuss the Value on Engineering on cuts that either may or may not be made. The new estimates of the project will come out on January 29, 2019.

Mr. Schlichtman moved to schedule a Special School Committee meeting on Wednesday, January 30, 2019 at 5:30 p.m. seconded by Mr. Thielman. Voted: 6-0

The committee members discussed space issues and recommend the least impact on programming at the high school. They size of the gym, stage are things they are looking at on the VE list.



Dr. Bodie continued to explain that The AHS Building committee would like the input of the School Committee members if the estimate comes up higher than the $308 million, but noted it would be an intense conversation and that we come up with priorities list of things to bring forward a recommendation from the School Committee if the number is below $308 million to cut $10 million from the estimate.

Dr. Bodie gave an update on upcoming community events

• Community Forum, Monday, January 14, 2019 – 7:00 PM Location: Arlington Town Hall

o Jeff Thielman gave a Project Overview Overview of MSBA process Other uses at Arlington High School Enrollment growth Educational Vision – Basis for Design Design Decisions

o Lori Cowles, HMFH gave a Schematic Design Update o Ryan Katofsky, AHS School Building Committee Member and

Sustainability/MEP Subcommittee Chairman, gave a Sustainability Update

o Adam Chapdelaine, Town Manager, gave a presentation on the project cost Cost Reductions Already made Parmenter School Study Status on Non-AHS Spaces Value Engineering Process High School Benchmark Analysis Cost Escalation Estimated Taxpayer Impact Next Steps

• School Committee Meeting, Thursday, January 24, 2019 – 6:30 PM

Location: School Committee Room, Arlington High School o Parmenter Cost Analysis:

Loss of income from ACC. Loss of programming. That is important in Arlington. Has been there for 30 years. Would be a major shift.

To include Preschool in high school - cost of swing space would be about 2.3 million for upgrades at Parmenter. More expensive to have preschool at _

Soft costs will still exist. Can’t compare numbers with soft costs to numbers without soft costs.

Kathy Bodie- cost estimates back on the 29th. Numbers will be reconciled. Committee is meeting on 30th to get report and talk



about value engineering. Can’t go above 308 million dollars, May have to do reductions. Building committee meets on the 31st, 5th, 12th - submit to MSBA on Feb. 20. All meetings are open.

• School Committee Special Meeting, Wednesday, January 30, 2019 – 6:30 PM

Location: School Committee Room, Arlington High School o School Committee discussion on Value Engineering for new AHS

The Arlington High School Building Committee, (AHSBC) asked the School Committee to rank items in case they need to cut some items out of the Value Engineering (VE) list between $2-4 million and see if the School Committee has questions.

The committee continued to discuss reductions of classroom sizes, athletic space, moving Payroll out of the building project, and price of the project. Dr. Bodie and Dr. Janger provided their recommendations as follows:

• Reduce preschool space • Reduce choir’s space • Reduce Black Box Theater • Reduce LABBB • Reduce all PE space

Mr. Thielman moved to adopt Superintendent Bodie’s rank order to present to the AHSBC tomorrow night, seconded by Mr. Kardon to remove to reduce all PE space from the list

Roll Call: Mr. Hayner abstained, Mr. Thielman Yes, Mr. Schlichtman No, Mr. Kardon yes, Dr. Allison-Ampe Yes. Voted: 3-1-1. Passes.

Mr. Hayner moved to eliminate the Payroll Department from the construction of the AHS Building project, seconded by Mr. Kardon. Roll Call: Mr. Hayner Yes, Mr. Thielman No, Mr. Schlichtman Yes, Mr. Kardon, abstained, and Dr. Allison-Ampe No. Motion fails.

Mr. Schlichtman moved to make cuts to the site amenities item 4 custom bikeway ramp access and item 6 the traffic light at Mill Street, seconded by Mr. Hayner. Mr. Schlichtman said these cuts should come before the previous recommendation and not the ranking order that is in the project. Roll Call: Mr. Hayner Yes, Mr. Thielman No, Mr. Schlichtman yes, Mr. Kardon No, Dr. Allison-Ampe No. Voted: 3-2 Motion fails.

Mr. Kardon moved that the School Committee supports the turf fields for AHS, seconded by Mr. Hayner. Roll Call: Mr. Hayner Yes, Mr. Thielman Yes, Mr. Schlichtman Yes, Mr. Kardon Yes, Dr. Alison-Ampe Yes. Motion unanimously passes.

Dr. Allison-Ampe moved to reconsider the motion made by Mr. Hayner to eliminate the Payroll Department from the construction of the AHS Building project, seconded by Mr. Kardon. Voted: Mr.



Hayner Yes, Ms. Morgan Yes, Mr. Schlichtman No, Mr. Thielman No, and Mr. Kardon abstained and Dr. Allison-Ampe Yes. 3-2-

Mr. Thielman move to advise the Arlington High School Building Committee that the School Committee recommends to move the Payroll out of the AHSBC project, seconded by Mr. Hayner. Roll Call: Mr. Hayner Yes, Ms. Morgan Yes, Mr. Thielman No, Mr. Schlichtman Yes, Mr. Kardon Yes, Dr. Allison-Ampe No. Voted: 5-2 Passes.

Mr. Thielman summarized what the Chair will communicate to the AHSBC that the first priority of the School Committee if cuts needed to made is to move Payroll out of bldg. and if further cuts:

• Decrease preschool class size • Reduce choir’s room • Reduce Black Box Theater • Reduce Labbb space

No action on the historical use but the School Committee prefers that cuts do not go to programming.

Correspondence Received: • AHS VE list 1 29 2019 AHSBC • Items for separate pricing 1 29 2019 AHSBC • AHS VE listed updated by Dr. Bodie

The meeting presentation materials, meeting minutes and summary materials as they relate to the Arlington High School project are available locally for public review at https://ahsbuilding.org/.







Arlington High School Building Committee Communications Subcommittee Meeting

Thursday, August 30, 2018 Superintendent’s Office

8:30 a.m.

Agenda

Fall Forum Planning

Old Business

New Business

AHS Building Committee, Communications Subcommittee Met 8/30/18 at 8:30am

Present: Kathleen Bodie, Amy Speare (Chair), Kirsi Allison-Ampe, Tobey Jackson, Julie Dunn, Joan Roman, Karen Tassone, Jim Burrows (by phone), Lori Cowles (by phone), Arthur Duffy (by phone), Jeff Thielman (by phone)

I. Forum Planning

Four forums planned ● Late September (September 24th)● October● November● January

Items discussed: Forum goals: keep public informed - public needs to be taught about the process and be able to give input

Overview of Sept forum plan draft. Main objectives: ● bring people up to date● allow for feedback● consider gathering feedback on what we want the building to look like. Make it

generalized feedback in advance of the public actually seeing designs.

Concerns about an open-ended response format. Recommended sharing ideas and images for people to respond to. Forum should be a choreographed presentation of what the AHSBC has already reviewed and responded to on Sept 17. Presentation would include a range of aesthetics and stylistic approaches to what it would look like

Questions about how to learn what the community wants re design.

There should be an “informed range of designs.”

Public needs basic education on design process, share the work that the committee is doing, and give opportunity for feedback

Public needs information during forum on why committee chose the option it did.

Summary of what agenda should be - could be Sept 24th ● summary of process to date● explanation of how design process will work● presentations of Sept 17 design work● feedback from community

KB will look at calendars off-line to propose forum dates for Oct and Nov (Oct forum could be week of Oct 22nd or 29th and the Nov forum could be week after Thanksgiving)

II. Advocate EditorialGuest editorial written by Adam C, Kathy B, and Jeff T in Advocate. Final edits being made andwill be published 9/6

III. Town Day Booth - Sept 15, 9:30am-3pm● Will have 10x10 booth and planning to borrow a tent● HMFH will share existing boards - site plans and floor plans. Lori will bring boards to 9/4

meeting● AHSBC members will staff it. AS will create sign-up genius● 1-page handout to distribute, copies of Advocate column● KAA: need a set of talking points. TJ will draft by 9/7● Have notecards and a box or a guest book for input/questions● AS will draft plan

IV. Schematic Design blogNeeds input from Kathy and Jim - scheduled to published 9/4

V. Website updates● new content/website reorganization being worked on by AS/KAA● make it clear that website is the official building website, NOT the school website● new banner image● make more of the content available on the home page● include a “where we are now” update on homepage● 3 buttons on homepage that go to current hot topics● add “Where can I find…?” section

Meeting adjourned at 10am Next meeting: 9/11/18, 8:30am

Arlington High School Building Committee

Meeting Date: Tuesday, September 4, 2018 – 6:00 pm Location: AHS-School Committee Room-Sixth Floor

Agenda

1. Public Participation

2. MSBA Process Update

3. Draft Traffic Study Report

4. Draft Schematic Design Work

5. Plan Public Forum Schedule

6. New Business

The listings of matters are those reasonably anticipated by the Chair which may be discussed at the meeting. Not all items listed may in fact be discussed and other items not listed may also be brought up for discussion to the extent permitted by law.

Approved October 2, 2018

Page 1 of 2

Arlington High School Building Committee Meeting Tuesday, September 4, 2018

AHS-School Committee Room-Sixth Floor 6:00 pm

Present: Jeff Thielman, School Committee Representative, Chair Kathleen Bodie, Superintendent, Co-vice chair Adam Chapdelaine, Town Manager, Co-vice chair Kirsi Allison-Ampe, School Committee Representative Francis Callahan, Community Member Representative John Cole, Chair, Permanent Town Building Committee John Danizio, APS Chief Financial Officer (absent) Tobey Jackson, Community Member Representative Matthew Janger, AHS Principal Ryan Katofsky, Community Member Representative Kate Loosian, Community Member Representative William McCarthy, AHS Assistant Principal Steve Nesterak, Facilities Director (exited at 6:50 pm) Judson Pierce, Community Member Sandy Pooler, Deputy Town Manager (@ 6:40 pm) Brian Rehrig, Capital Planning Committee Member Daniel Ruiz, Community Member Representative Amy Speare, Community Member Representative Shannon Knuth, Teacher Representative Kent Werst, Teacher Representative (absent) Also present: Chuck Adam, Jim Burrows, Victoria Clifford, Skanska Inc. Lori Cowles, Arthur Duffy, Melissa Greene, HMFH Architects, Inc. Call to order: 6:00 pm Public Participation Chris Mungerast Patricia Seitz – like the program, concerned with losing green – lessen the massing, scale back Patricia Worden-concern that this is not a proposal that Town Meeting can vote for-need a new design and a new architect firm. Carl Wagner- supports a new high school, not a design that does not include the front façade and green, concerned that 2/3 of tm will not vote approval. Grant Cook –noted that we are growing a design with MSBA and need to work through the process. Patrice Smith-supports rebuild-concerned with green space, would like to preserve. Kristen Fritsch –commended sustainability-gave suggestion on life cycle analysis. Michael Delizi Chris Loreti-cost too high-would be the most expensive school in the state per pupil expects opposition from voters. Ian Goodsell – respect the process-encouraged public to let the building committee work on the process. Ron Ellings – disappointed in demolishing AHS legacy, wants an explanation on why this is happening. MSBA Process Update Chair, Jeff Thielman noted that the current shape and form presented is the massing only but not the design. The community is invited to visit the AHS Building Committee booth at town day and to also attend our biweekly meetings for updates.


Page 2 of 2

Jim Burrow of Skanska review the MSBA timeline, currently we are the schematic design phase where the committee will develop a robust schematic design in order to establish: Scope Budget Schedule Submittal for DESE approval The OPM will the schematic design to MSBA on 2/22/2019. Draft Traffic Study Report The Traffic study was reviewed, various options were discussed: eliminate Carey Drive, traffic around Mill and Grove Street exits and DPW access. Ideally pedestrian but not vehicular traffic would travel through DPW. Changes needed would go through Select Board via Traffic Advisory through Mass Dot. Draft Schematic Design Work Lori Cowles HMFH reviewed the design process noting that currently we are in the concept design phase. Part of the design process includes:

Defining the problem Collecting information Brainstorming to analyze ideas. Create solutions Present feedback Evolve the design

The committee reviewed models of the Thompson school, Winthrop and Brookline as examples of evolving plans. Concern relative to the time line from cost estimate to submittal to MSBA was discussed by the committee. Daniel Ruiz, Ken Pruitt (Energy Manager and Steve Nesterak (Facilities Director) will join the sustainability subcommittee. Public Forum Schedule

The First Public Forum is scheduled for Monday, September 24th from 7:00 pm to 9:00 pm at Arlington Town Hall.

Forums for October, November and January to be determined. New Business Ryan Katofsky as part of the sustainability project would like to bring to the next meeting the representative of accelerate performance that works integrally with the design process on sustainability, Chuck, Lori and Ryan will bring additional information at the next meeting. Next meeting scheduled for Monday, September 17th. On a motion by John Cole seconded by Kate Loosian it was Voted to adjourn @ 8:20 pm. Respectfully submitted by: Karen Tassone Recording Secretary AHS Building Committee [email protected]

Commented [K1]:

mailto:[email protected]


Tuesday, September 11, 2018 Superintendent’s Office

8:30 a.m.

Agenda

Planning for Town Day

Planning for Fall Forums & feedback solicitation

Website updates

Communications calendar

Old business

New business

AHS Building Committee, Communications Subcommittee

Met 9/11 /18 at 8:30am

Present: Kathleen Bodie, Amy Speare (Chair), Kirsi Allison-Ampe, Tobey Jackson, Julie Dunn,

Jim Burrows, Victoria Clifford, and Lori Cowles (by phone).

9/15 Town Day Planning

Goals:

• Building awareness

• Publicize fall/winter forums

• Gather community feedback

Handouts/Materials:

• 1-pager to get people up to speed

• Advocate editorial

• Banner for tent with town seal - Skanska can print

• Boards fo Option 3a. HMFH can prepare "design concepts" - site plans, floor plans,

sectional, massing diagram

• Construction timeline handout

• Nametags

• Water

Gathering feedback - will have index cards for visitors to fill out. Booth volunteers will keep

notes in notebook

Booth volunteers will have talking points to refer to with anticipated questions

Skanska and HMFH will be present throughout day

Fall Forum Planning and Feedback Solicitation

Dates are set for September 24, October 24, and November 27. January and February forum

dates are TBD

• Focus for September forum: site design/plan: traffic, use of front green and outdoor

spaces, share schedule for exterior design development

• Focus for October forum: exterior look and feel of building

KAA: forecasts pushback about the size of the front green

LC: Front green will change. Building on front green to keep school in session during

construction and reduce swing space costs. There is great opportunity to how to design and use

a re-designed front green.

Visuals planned for September 17 forum: overall site diagrams, blow-ups of each programming

area (front green and courtyards), enlarged site plans of portions of building to show scale, east

and west views coming up Mass Ave, some precedent images (ex. amphitheatre)

JB: recommends laying out a workplan schedule to development of exterior design. HMFH will

develop schedule

AS: Traffic Advisory Committee (TAC), police and DPW need to be briefed on traffic study.

Traffic study will be sent.

Subcommittee will discuss how to gather feedback during forum after September 17 Building

Committee meeting

Website updates

Website is updated based on community feedback

Communications Calendar

• Blog by Tobey on schematic design is posted on website and will go to Advocate week

of September 17

• Blog by Kate L on why Option 3a was chosen will be posted week of September 17

• New e-bulletin going out this week

Responding to emails

• AS: Need a better system for managing emails as volume goes up

• JB: emails should continue to run through Skanska. Skanska can manage increased

volume

• Karen T will maintain a log of what's been responded to and when

• Every two weeks, Building Committee will receive a pdf of community questions and

responses. All emails should be sent to Karen who will prepare and distribute the pdf

Social Media

• Responding to social media posts - more capacity needed to handle this

• JB: responses should correct factual inaccuracies and tell people how they can give

input; don't respond to general complaints.

• KB: hire someone to manage the Facebook site and respond to comments. Could Joan

R do this?

Meeting adjourned at 10:15am

Next meeting: 9/18/18, 8:00am


Meeting Date: Tuesday, September 17, 2018 – 6:00 pm Location: AHS-School Committee Room-Sixth Floor

Agenda


2. MSBA Process

3. Accelerate Performance Program

4. Project Costs/Estimating Review

5. Site Design Presentation

6. Communications Subcommittee Report

7. September 24 Public Forum Discussion

8. New Business



Page 1 of 3

Arlington High School Building Committee Meeting Monday, September 17, 2018


Present: Jeff Thielman, School Committee Representative, Chair Kathleen Bodie, Superintendent, Co-vice chair Adam Chapdelaine, Town Manager, Co-vice chair Kirsi Allison-Ampe, School Committee Representative Francis Callahan, Community Member Representative John Cole, Chair, Permanent Town Building Committee John Danizio, APS Chief Financial Officer Tobey Jackson, Community Member Representative Matthew Janger, AHS Principal (@6:30 pm) Ryan Katofsky, Community Member Representative Kate Loosian, Community Member Representative William McCarthy, AHS Assistant Principal Steve Nesterak, Facilities Director Judson Pierce, Community Member Sandy Pooler, Deputy Town Manager Brian Rehrig, Capital Planning Committee Member Daniel Ruiz, Community Member Representative Amy Speare, Community Member Representative Shannon Knuth, Teacher Representative Kent Werst, Teacher Representative (@6:15 pm) Also present: Chuck Adam, Jim Burrows, Dale Caldwell,

Victoria Clifford, Skanska Inc. Lori Cowles, Arthur Duffy, Melissa Greene, HMFH Architects, Inc. Kimberly Cullinane, Ben Heymer (via phone) Eversource Call to order: 6:00 pm Public Participation Patricia Worden – design violates Community Preservation Act. John Worden – relocate Town & School administration to Parmenter or Central School. Ian Goodsell –supports building committee and the job they are doing. Greg Christiana –supports building committee, grateful for compromise, keep project on

track. Len Kardon – appreciates committee work, focus on best educational decisions for students,

keep in mind increasing enrollments. John Kohl –keep in mind the current façade in design plan. Carl Wagner – the SOHAHS group supports the rebuild project, is trying to guide the design

to ensure support at Town Meeting. Would like to see a design change by the next meeting. Rachel Stark – attended 3 forums – took away was that the current façade would remain. Ron Alex – would like to see the breakdown in the cost comparisons.


Page 2 of 3

Chris – spoke to the risks in option 3, renovation looks like a better option Peter Bloom – supports overrides – likes an open space and current architect. Michael Pugliese – K parents have little knowledge of the project, suggests looking at costs

line by line and have 1 or 2 committee members who are able to speak to it. MSBA Process Update AHS Building Committee Chair, Jeff Thielman, read a statement to the committee and audience outlining the process and decisions made by the committee to date (attached). Mr. Thielman then invited committee members to speak and discuss their vote and if there was a desire to revote the current option. A motion to reopen the design vote made by the AHS Building Committee on the Arlington High School design was made by John Cole and seconded by Sandy Pooler. Motion failed unanimously. Members of the committee spoke to the process upon which they made their final decision. Many initially were in favor of retaining the Collomb and Fusco buildings and the green frontage, but as the process evolved, voted what they believed was the best option. Members did note that they do have concerns with the estimated cost of the project and would continue to be diligent in monitoring the project budget. Accelerate Performance Program Kim Cullinane of Eversource and Ben Heymer (via phone) of seventhwave. Kim Cullinane of Eversource explained that MASS Save is a collaborative of the State, electric and natural gas, its initiative is to help Massachusetts’ residents, businesses and communities save energy. Through the Mass Save Program, the Program Administrators (PSs), which are mostly utilities, collaborate to help reduce building-related energy consumption. The program has measurable outcomes, guaranteed up front incentive dollars, will help us attain our net zero goal and the timeline does not interfere or slow down the design team. On a motion by Adam Chapdelaine seconded by Kate Lossian it was unanimously Voted to move forward with the Mass Save New Construction Program. Project Costs/Estimating Review Jim Burrows (Skanska, Inc.) reviewed the project timeline and process flow chart. The estimate current project stats

Preferred Schematic Report (PSR) Conceptual Estimate: Total Budget: $308,278341 $70M – 90M cost impacts are above a typical high school that include: Spaces with GSF over MSBA cap (non-reimbursable) and also include Menotomy Preschool, Sustainability Premium, Site Development (contamination) Site Toilet Facility, District Administration, Town IT, Town-Facilities, Payroll, Comptroller, LABBB program and Community Education. Construction Budget: $238,072,994 Arlington Share: $211,215,966 MSBA Share: $ 97,062,375


Page 3 of 3

As unknowns decrease cost estimate numbers can be refined. Escalating costs in a 5 year project = 4% is the industry standard for a school project. The finance subcommittee will work with Skanska to explore and define additional costs. Site Design Presentation Lori Cowles (HMF) presented: The Department of Public Works (DPW) site concepts:

Alternative 12-allows pedestrian and bicycle access in a more secure site (then currently) Alternative 13-allow for vehicular activity. The committee discussed the pros and cons

of each option including the option of a drop off only at Grove Street. HMFH will meet with the Traffic Advisory Committee (TAC) later in the week to discuss.

The committee will make a decision at their October 2nd meeting. Site Circulation Diagrams:

Alternatives 1, 1A and 2 were discussed and will continue at the next meeting. Site Design Opportunities presented by CSS included:

New Amenity Spaces Entrance/Front Lawn Existing Trees at Front Lawn/Front Lawn Character to be preserved Existing and Proposed Open Space Comparison Outdoor amphitheater, outdoor classrooms, preschool play area, athletic fields

Communications Subcommittee Report Communications Subcommittee continues to work on the September 24th community forum. The forum will cover: an overview of the building project, costs and decisions made to date. Committee members can send any questions/comments to Amy Speare. September 24 Public Forum Will take place at Town Hall from 7:00 – 9:00 pm. New Business None Next meeting scheduled for Tuesday October 2nd @ 6:00 pm. On a motion by Adam Chapdelaine seconded by Kate Lossian it was Voted to adjourn @ 9:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted by: Karen Tassone Recording Secretary AHS Building Committee [email protected]



Tuesday, September 18, 2018 Superintendent’s Office

8:00 a.m.

Agenda

Planning for Fall forums

Community outreach and feedback solicitation

Communications calendar review

Approval of minutes from 7/18/18, 8/30/18, 9/11/18 meetings

Old Business

New Business


Met 9/18/18 at 8:00am


Karen Tassone, Jim Burrows, and Victoria Clifford

I. September 24 Forum Planning

Reviewed Forum Plan Draft

Jeff T will give project update (with powerpoint) - 20 minutes

Skanska will do cost presentation, including a table of costs over above the project just being a

building for AHS students. Skanska will present a comparison of AHS project cost to other high

school projects - 10 minutes

Q & A on these topics - 10 minutes

HMFH gives overview of design process and what to expect - 5 minutes

HMFH presentation about the site with landscape architects - 25 minutes

Presentation will include whole site explanation, front green and open space concepts (outdoor

learning areas and amphitheatre). KB will ask Lori to create street views without a designed

building facade

Will HMFH will give overview of traffic survey and traffic flow?

Community Feedback - 30 minutes

Index cards for questions with open mic for those who want to ask questions

II. Community Outreach and Feedback Solicitation

• Make brief presentations at PTO meetings (all elementary schools, Gibbs, Ottoson). AS

will reach out to PTO presidents

• Advocate - Schematic Design article published this week

• Community forum flyers will be posted at pre-schools and community bulletin boards

around town

Ill. Meeting Minutes

Motion to approve 7/18 and 9/11 meeting minutes by KAA. 2nd by T J

Approved unanimously (5-0)




Wednesday, September 26, 2018 Superintendent’s Office

8:30 a.m.

Agenda

September Forum debrief Community outreach and feedback solicitation Responding to email, online, social media dialogue Communications calendar review Approval of minutes from 8/30/18, 9/18/18 meetings Old Business New Business


Met 9/26/18 at 8:30am


Jim Burrows (by phone), and Victoria Clifford (by phone).

I. September Forum Debrief

• Strong message from participants who want to maintain a "park" or open space in front

• Impression that community members walked away with greater appreciation of the

complexity of the whole project

• Presentations slides and summary of cost factors chart shared at forum will be posted on

website

• ACMI broadcast will be posted on website

• AS will write re-cap of forum as a blog post

II. Community Outreach and Feedback Solicitation

• AS has reached out to all PTO's. Will share dates once all are confirmed.

• True Story Theatre proposed Nov 7 to do improv performance with a community

dialogue on the front facade and green space. Possible spaces are community room at

Robbins or Fox Library

• Town Meeting member tours to be scheduled in October/November followed by

discussion with Building Committee - proposed dates are Oct 29 and Nov 5 before

November forum (follow the same plan from March 2018 community tours). Letter will go

out from Town Manager's Office

• Plan for responding to social media/A-list posts is TBD.

• Skanska will respond to AHS building emails even as volume rises- will bring in others

on committee as needed to review responses. Process for involving other committee

members to be drafted by AS and KAA

Ill. Review of minutes

Move to approve 8/30/18 minutes

Motion by KAA, 2nd by T J

Approved unanimously, 4-0


Motion by JS, 2nd by KAA





Meeting Date: Tuesday, October 2, – 6:00 pm Location: AHS-School Committee Room-Sixth Floor

Agenda


2. Feasibility Study Budget Update

3. HMFH ♦ Green Space Design ♦ Elements of Design Discussion

4. Communications Subcommittee Report

5. Approval of Minutes

6. New Business


Approved November 6, 2018

Page 1 of 2

Arlington High School Building Committee Meeting Tuesday, October 2, 2018


Present: Jeff Thielman, School Committee Representative, Chair Kathleen Bodie, Superintendent, Co-vice chair Adam Chapdelaine, Town Manager, Co-vice chair Kirsi Allison-Ampe, School Committee Representative Francis Callahan, Community Member Representative John Cole, Chair, Permanent Town Building Committee John Danizio, APS Chief Financial Officer Tobey Jackson, Community Member Representative Matthew Janger, AHS Principal (@6:15) Ryan Katofsky, Community Member Representative Kate Loosian, Community Member Representative William McCarthy, AHS Assistant Principal Steve Nesterak, Facilities Director (absent) Judson Pierce, Community Member Sandy Pooler, Deputy Town Manager Brian Rehrig, Capital Planning Committee Member Daniel Ruiz, Community Member Representative Amy Speare, Community Member Representative Shannon Knuth, Teacher Representative Kent Werst, Teacher Representative Also present: Jim Burrows, Victoria Clifford, Skanska Inc. Lori Cowles, Arthur Duffy, Melissa Greene, HMFH Architects, Inc. Call to order: 6:00 pm Public Participation Carl Wagner – noted that there are no changes in option 3A – questioned what costs are included in the 308 million project. Ron Alex – Save as much as possible, go forward in a positive way. Grant Cook – thanked the committee for the September forum – current façade does not work. Steve DeCourcey – concerned with the front green, traffic flow around the building. Ian Goodsall – what are the next steps if the debt exclusion if not approved. Feasibility Study Budget Update Jim Burrows reviewed the budget dashboard and updated the numbers by cost code. HMFH Green Space Design HMFH presented four draft options to highlight expanded green space – total square footage remains the same on each diagram. The Mass Avenue façade draft concepts were reviewed including: Site Plans – Historic, Auditorium, Sustainable and Education Diagrams and massing’s – Historic, Auditorium, Sustainable and Education


Page 2 of 2

Perspectives and elevation - Historic Auditorium Sustainable and Education Elements of Design Discussion HMFH presented – the definition of what is iconic: widely recognized and well established – widely known and acknowledged for its excellence. Showed examples of iconic buildings, discussed New England architecture. Supt Bodie requested that HMFH show a design that has strong similarities as the current façade. Communications Subcommittee Report The Subcommittee is working on: November 5th Town Meeting Members will tour Arlington High School, followed by an information

session in old hall. A Question & Answer session at the Senior Center mid-day on November 10th or 17th. Speaking to PTO’s during October and November True Story Theater will work the community on the AHS project on November 7th at the Thompson

School. The AHS blog to address misconceptions on the project Sustainability Subcommittee Ryan Katofsky requested that committee members fill out his survey as soon as possible. The next subcommittee meeting is scheduled for October 11th at 2:30 p, Finance Subcommittee The next meeting is scheduled for Thursday, October 4th. Approval of minutes On a motion by Adam Chapdelaine seconded by Brian Rehrig it was unanimously Voted to approve the meeting minutes of September 4, 2018 On a motion by Adam Chapdelaine seconded by Brian Rehrig it was unanimously Voted to approve the meeting minutes of September 17, 2018. New Business Town Manager Adam Chapdelaine reported that Minuteman Technical is not interested in partnering

with Arlington during the rebuild process. HMFH is looking at the Parmenter School for housing non educational spaces. Tentatively the comptroller’s offices will be housed at town hall, facilities and IT at DPW. Discussed the timing of the debt exclusion and operating override there will be more clarity as the

Long Term Planning Committee meets over the winter. The Select Board is the gatekeeper in making the decision on when the vote will take place.

The chair announced that there will be opportunity going forward for citizens input during the end of each meeting.

On a motion by Ryan Katofsky seconded by Daniel Ruiz it was unanimously:

Voted to adjourn @ 8:25 p.m.

Respectfully submitted by: Karen Tassone Recording Secretary AHS Building Committee

Arlington High School Building Committee Finance Subcommittee Meeting

Thursday October 4, 2018 Manager’s Conference Room-Town Hall Annex

4:00 p.m.

Agenda

Invoice and Sub-consultant Review and Approval

Discussion: RE: Project Cost Estimating and Project Budget

Other Business


Thursday, October 11, 2018 School Committee Room

8:30 a.m.

Agenda

October Forum Planning

Community Outreach Update

Approval of 9/26/18 Meeting Minutes

Old Business

New Business


Met 10/11/18 at 8:30am

Present: Amy Speare (Chair), Tobey Jackson, Julie Dunn, Jim Burrows (by phone), and Victoria

Clifford .

I. October Forum Planning

Will include presentation from HMFH. Possible topics:

• Orientation of front green/different configurations of performing arts space

• External facade options

• Traffic. There is feedback from DPW and police. Not clear if there is feedback from TAC

yet. JB will find out if traffic is on Building Committee agenda for 10/16. Then committee

determine if this will be topic for 10/24 forum or not

Forum will be planned in detail on 10/18 after we learn more at 10/16 mtg

II. Community Outreach Update

• AS presented at Bishop PTO on 10/5. T J and John Cole presented at Hardy PTO on

10/9 and Thompson PTO on 10/10 with Brian Rehrig.

• Adam C and KM presenting at Senior Center next week, 10/17, 11 :30am-12:30pm

• Parents at PTO meetings supportive and engaged though relatively small number of

parents polled have been to community forums. AS still working on scheduling with other

PTO's

• Idea discussed to have liaisons for PTO and community groups for follow-ups and

updates. Plans TBD

• Forum flyers have been distributed to all town pre-schools

• Town meeting member tours scheduled for Nov 5

• True Story Theatre scheduled for Nov 7

• T J to connect with Commission for Arts and Culture via intro by Julie D. Date TBD

• May be possible to give project update at Dec 5 Special Town Meeting. Plans TBD.

• Idea to set up open hours at Kickstand discussed

Ill. Review of minutes


Motion by T J, 2nd by JD


IV. Old Business

Communication calendar/blog posts

• AS has written blog post on cost factors. Needs review before going out

• There will be biogs recapping the forums

• Need to publish blog on buckets of cost in additional cost factors and how we arrived at

those numbers. KAA is writing this

• HS Comparison data will potentially be a blog post

• Other potential Blog posts

o MASS Save partnership and sustainability efforts

o Menotomy Preschool

o MSBA reimbursable vs non-reimbursable costs. Dan Ruiz has offered to help

write

Need to clarify to community that project is not a done deal and dependent on funding. Put this

on home page? TBD




Sustainability Subcommittee Meeting

Meeting Date: Thursday, October 11, 2018 – 2:30 pm Location: AHS-School Committee Room-Sixth Floor

Agenda

1. Review Eversource Accelerate Performance Program MOU2. Review Sustainability Goals Survey Responses3. Review Benchmarking Data and Preliminary Model Results4. Discuss/Edit Project Performance Goals

The listings of matters are those reasonably anticipated by the Chair which may be discussed at the meeting. Not all items listed may in fact be discussed and

other items not listed may also be brought up for discussion to the extent permitted by law.

Arlington High School Building Committee AHS Sustainability/MEP Subcommittee Meeting

Thursday Oct 11, 2018, 2:30pm - 5pm Skanska Meeting Notes – Recorded by Victoria Clifford & reviewed by Ryan Katofsky Attendees: Ryan Katofsky, Kevin Settlemyre, Brendan Giza-Sisson (Eversource), Kevin Caddle, Rachel Oliveri, Nitya Sompuram, Chin Lin, Steve Nesterak, Daniel Ruiz, Victoria Clifford, Arthur Duffy, Nate Dick (Eversource), Charles Stellberger (Eversrouce), Kent Werst, Ben Heymer (Seventhwave), Kim Cullinane (Eversource), Rob Diemer (by phone) Seventhwave – Accelerated Performance for Arlington Schools Presentation

Presented by Ben Heymer & Kim Cullinane Process:

- Firstly, Identify EUI goals (summarize goals) - Arlington will be awarded a stipend for a design charrette ($3,000) - Front loaded incentives: the program will guarantee incentive of $0.50/sqft based on EUI

selected (provided the building achieves its goal) - If school outperforms its goal, the program will reward based on savings per existing

incentive levels, but not less than the up-front guarantee. - Steve requests examples of similar size programs that have gone through the accelerated

performance demonstration program - HMFH has not decided if HMFH or InPosse will be performing the energy modeling (it

is a contractual decision that needs to be made) - Comment is made that the consultant that performs the energy model needs to be

comfortable with sharing the model with Eversource - The way the school is scheduled and operated plays a huge role in the EUI – the school

building being efficient is only one piece of the pie. EUI is determined by the schedule. - Another key consideration is the plug load - There is $30,000 dollars of incentive money for Arlington

o First half of the payment will be made out to the design team if the design hits the EUI mark (subject to review by Seventhwave)

- Will MSBA Participate or Deduct for these grants? o General sense is no. Skanska to investigate this and report back. o Kim (Eversource) answered that utility incentives are no longer deducted from

MSBA reimbursement levels and that this program is supported by the MSBA. Survey Results (sustainability priorities of the full AHS Building Committee):

- Strong desire for building to be connected to the outdoors - Strong interest for net zero energy ready or net zero energy - Strong desire to reduce water use by 30% - Maximize renewable power production - Programing:

o desire for the building to be flexible for future programmatic changes

- Climate resilience: o fully resilient to all climate conditions

- Prioritization: o (low score -high desire) Indoor environmental quality, ease of maintained,

lowering utility bills -- all practical goals o (high score – low desire) – risk reward sharing, receive external recognition,

intelligent feedback, superior interior finish, latest technology o Reoccurring themes: passive design, ease of maintenance o Concern that “low first cost” fell to low desire – not in line with the feedback the

committee has been receiving from the community - HMFH is concerned that the survey / information presented thus far does not consider

that this building is a school – the building needs to serve its purpose, serve the students and the educational plan

- Seventhwave notes that the survey was geared to energy usage rather than school operations

- Non-negotiables that consider the school program needs to be woven in – it will serve as a baseline

- It is noted that the Educational Program isn’t written from the perspective of how the spaces will be served by mechanical systems/acoustics/lighting

- HMFH needs a clear direction from the District on which LEED acoustics they are aiming to achieve so that HMFH can deliver the desired building

- Ben is using 100-year building life evaluation - MSBA uses a 30-year building life evaluation - Ben to show his priority numbers at a 30-year building life basis - The building COULD be programed so that wings are shut off to conserve energy –

needs to align with the educational plan and building utilization - Kate Loosian – Would push for system controls to be higher on the priority list (currently

on the “If Possible” list) o InPosse responds – good system controls will be provided regardless

- HMFH mentions that we need to be cautious of what EUI goal is being advertised to the public. We can transparently advertise an obtainable goal – there can be an internal goal that is lower.

- Ryan asks - what are the steps necessary to create an energy model?

o Ben – first we need to set a deadline for the initial outline - The sustainability committee needs to inform the larger SBC on the consensus for

thermal comfort (temperature/humidity) - HMFH notes that historically we haven’t seen high schools come in under 40 EUI

(historically). If we want to beat a 40 EUI, we need to be committed o Kevin C. noted that high schools can be as low as 36 today

- Kevin S. offers to compile historical data of HS EUI’s – will include caveats for the systems they are using

- The subcommittee needs more information to understand what the proposed design can handle for ground source heat pumps

- HMFH suggests adding photovoltaics to the northeast site slope (between away bleachers and bike path)

o Who owns that space? o HMFH / Skanska to look at site survey o Potentially very costly due to the contamination

- Double glazed vs. Triple glazed windows (premium attached) - Heating / cooling are we hitting a point or a range?

o Should be a space by space conversation o Delivering 80 or 75 degrees? It is a hard question regardless of how it is delivered

(systems) - Dan suggests that we have one more meeting with this group to define the energy model

goals before reporting out to the full committee Next steps:

- The program needs a range for EUI - recommended range is +/- 3 points - Pick a range and design to that goal - Will need HMFH to give a critical timeline of when the decisions need to be made by the

committee on the HVAC system - One week for the committee to review the Seventhwave report & provide feedback.

Arlington High School Building Committee Sustainability/MEP Subcommittee

Meeting Date: Monday, October 29, 2018 – 2:30 p.m. Location: AHS-Guidance Conference Room

Agenda

Finalize comfort requirements Review OPR comments Review and approve new draft of OPR and energy targets



Mon Oct 29, 2018, 2:30pm - 5pm Meeting Notes – Recorded by Ryan Katofsky Attendees: Ryan Katofsky, Charlotte Milan, Ken Pruitt, Stephanie MacNeil, Kent Werst, Lori Cowles, Chin Lin, Kevin Settlemyer, Kevin Caddle, Brendan Giza-Sisson (Eversource), Jim Burrows, Tiago Gomes, Henry Fox-Jurkowitz, Quinn Connell, Ben Heymer (by phone) Thermal comfort discussion

Mainly a cooling issue o Are we having cooling everywhere? o For classrooms, designing for 80F and 45% RH for a design day (outdoor

conditions of 91F with 73F wet bulb – about 65% RH) is reasonable o Should look at last 5 years to see how often this is exceeded o Also, does the town alredy have standard set points for town buildings?

Basis of design document

This is the narrative that the design team will prepare for the different trades constructing the building

We will include the Accelerate Performance scoping document as part of this We will also separate out elements not related to the Accelerate Performance program

into a separate document on sustainability features to also be included in the Basis of Design document

EUI discussion

For buildings >250,000 square feet in MA, designs are typically 40-42, with actual performance at around 55

NREL has modeled K-12 schools in the 22-42 range Air-cooled VRF systems are nearly as efficient as ground-source heat pumps, because

have very low pumping requirements compared to GSHPs. There is a cost allocation for GSHPs in the budget assuming 400 wells, with the actual

costs to be determined based o nthe number of wells needed, and phasing, which still needs to be determined (e.g., need to drill test wells to determine ground conductivity, which influences number and depth of wells)

The subcommittee agreed to the following goals for EUI o Baseline: 38 (all electric), 48 (primarily gas heat). This is the minimum for

participating in the Accelerate Performance program o Target 30 (all electric), 40 (primarily gas heat). This is what we will be trying to

achieve. Accelerate Performance Scoping Document

The subcommittee reviewed the revised scoping document, including the agreed to EUI targets, so that it could be presented to the full AHS BC for a vote.


Communications Subcommittee Meeting Tuesday, October 30, 2018 School Committee Room

8:30 a.m.

Agenda

Nov 5 Town Meeting Member Tour and Info Session planning

Community Outreach update


Old Business

New Business


Present: Amy Speare (Chair), Kathy Bodie, Kirsi Allison-Ampe, Tobey Jackson, Julie Dunn, Joan Roman, and Karen Tassone.

I. November 5 Town Meeting Member and Info Session

Letter and email invite has gone out from Adam Chapdelaine to Town Meeting Two sections of night: 35-40 minute tour followed by info session

Tour: ● AS will work with Bill M to organize tour and make sure rooms are open● Students needed as tour guides and to be in rooms. TJ to ask girls vball team for help● AS and TJ will revise the tour handout

Info session:

Materials/information needed ● HMFH boards that were used at Town Day● Handouts

○ Blogs: Addressing Misconceptions, Cost Contributors Explained○ Project overview

● Powerpoint - based on Sept forum powerpoint. Add slides about facade and green. ASwill draft powerpoint

● E-bulletin sign-up sheet

Agenda for info session Brief overview to leave plenty of time for questions and feedback

● Overview/remarks on process and update (Jeff)● Where we are in design process (Jeff)● Address misconceptions (Jeff)● Discuss current cost estimates/contributors (Adam/Sandy)● Q and A session (need to forecast questions that may be asked. KT will ask building

committee members to send expected questions).● Ask town meeting members what else should be done to engage community and what

they need from BC when talking to their precincts

II. Community Outreach Update

● PTO meetings upcoming○ 11/2 Stratton, 11/8 Brackett, 11/9 Hardy, 11/14 Peirce○ OMS, Gibbs, Dallin TBD

● True Story Theatre event on Nov 7

● Town Hall Bulletin Board is reserved Jan/Feb 2018 for Black History Month. JR will findout if board can be shared.

● TJ met with Commision for Arts and Culture - they will email committee about desire toincorporate public art into front green and facade.

● Discussion of a subcommittee for programming and design of front green● 10/17 Senior Center presentation had about 8 attendees. Another presentation should

be planned there. Potentially in January? AS will follow up with Senior Center.

III. Communication Calendars/Blog Post

● Second cost factors blog being written by KAA● Blog about preschool being written by Jane Morgan● Shannon Knuth and Kent Werst will write a blog about how great the new school will be

from a teacher’s perspective

IV. Review of minutes

Motion to approve 10/18/18 minutes Motion by KAA, 2nd by TJ Approved unanimously, 5-0

Meeting adjourned at 10:00am Next meetings: 11/14/18, 3:00pm and 11/26/18 8:30am


Meeting Date: Tuesday, November 6, – 6:00 pm Location: AHS-School Committee Room-Sixth Floor

Agenda


2. SMEP Subcommittee Presentation

3. Site Design Progress

4. Courtyard Light Study

5. Central Spine Use Concepts

6. Finance Subcommittee Update

7. Communications Update

8. New Business



Page 1 of 3

Arlington High School Building Committee Meeting Tuesday, November 6, 2018


Present: Jeff Thielman, School Committee Representative, Chair Kathleen Bodie, Superintendent, Co-vice chair Adam Chapdelaine, Town Manager, Co-vice chair Kirsi Allison-Ampe, School Committee Representative Francis Callahan, Community Member Representative (exited @ 7:00 pm) John Cole, Chair, Permanent Town Building Committee John Danizio, APS Chief Financial Officer Tobey Jackson, Community Member Representative Matthew Janger, AHS Principal Ryan Katofsky, Community Member Representative Kate Loosian, Community Member Representative William McCarthy, AHS Assistant Principal (@6:15) Steve Nesterak, Facilities Director (absent) Judson Pierce, Community Member Sandy Pooler, Deputy Town Manager Brian Rehrig, Capital Planning Committee Member Daniel Ruiz, Community Member Representative Amy Speare, Community Member Representative Shannon Knuth, Teacher Representative Kent Werst, Teacher Representative Also present: Chuck Adam, Jim Burrows, Victoria Clifford, Skanska Inc. Lori Cowles, Arthur Duffy, Melissa Greene, HMFH Architects, Inc. Call to order: 6:00pm Public Participation

John Leonard –questioned what kind of plan will be put in place for job site security (i.e. to protect materials), plans for eliminate construction traffic – suggested placing staging at the ice rink so that private contract vehicles could be housed there and provide a shuttle to the site.

Rachel Starks –Questioned if students only have 3 minutes to pass from class to class, how will they have the ability to collaborate.

Leba Heigham – thanked the committee for the AHS TMM tours and information session – glad to hear that the main objective for the project is student learning and not on green space and the building as has been reported.

Chris Loreti – no response to the ash building email – will not support and non-educational program in a debt exclusion.

Carl Wagner –stated that the committee should seriously consider a longer period of reflection for community feedback.

Sophie Borksten – resident of Schouler Court - concerned with street, noise considerations, would like to be informed around construction plans. Suggested having a separate meeting for neighbors. meeting.


Page 2 of 3

SMEP Subcommittee Presentation

Ben Heymer from Seventhwave via Skype, Brendan Giza-Sisson from Eversource, Fran Boucher from National Grid, Nathaniel Dick from Eversource, Sean McGloin from National Grid. Presented: A Review of Proposed Energy Performance Targets for the New AHS

Adopt aggressive, but realistic, energy use targets early in the design process Site energy use intensity (EUI) at least 25% lower than code compliant building Position the new AHS to become an all-electric and net-zero energy building Achieve desired energy performance at no or low incremental cost Discussed:

Program incentives Proposed AHS EUI Goal Other Key Energy Goals Proposed AHS EUI Goals On a motion by Daniel Ruiz seconded by Brian Rehrig it was unanimously: Voted to accept the Accelerated Performance Program as a basis for the committees’ work ahead.

HMFH Update Site Design Progress

o Site Plan 1 - allows for benches, greenery, covered bike space (86 spaces) and 240 parking spaces, includes a regulation baseball field.

o Site Plan 2 – provides for another practice field, but only provides for 154 parking spaces, leaves the discussion of parking on the table i.e. the option of constructing a parking structure.

The committee agreed that all options should be explored. The Town Manager proposed that we move forward with site plan 1 to allow more time for cost analysis and exploration. Courtyard Light Study

Reviewed the Courtyard Light Study – Existing average light levels throughout the year and the Proposed Courtyard Light levels which will be comparable to the existing.

Historic Study Use Presented an amphitheater concept that incorporates the front columns and façade of the high school, An option that uses the columns in the auditorium itself and an option that incorporates the Fusco House façade into the .black box theater.

Central Spine Use Concepts HMFH presented an overview of the central spine concepts that showed: The D-Lab, main entry, the lobby arty gallery, green roof, cafeteria forum stairs and learning commons. The committee requested an acoustic study of this, noted that through this concept all areas could be seen/accessed with 3 minutes which could never be achieved with any other option except for 3A, this option is also consistent with the educational vision and respects the reused of historic elements.

Public Participation

Grant Cook stated that the central spine concepts helps to sell the educational vision and is very impressive.


Page 3 of 3

Finance Subcommittee Update

Adam Chapdelaine reported that the subcommittee meets on Thursday and will be reviewing: updated budget projections, cost impacts of options presented by HMFH and potential budget reduction strategies. Communications Update

Reported that approximately 87 Town Meeting Members attended the AHS Tours and information session the previous night. There was good discussion and incredibly positive ….

The committee continues outreach through PTO coffees. True Story Theatre will present at the Thompson School on November 7th at 7:00 p.m. The next community forum is scheduled for November 27 Discussed when the January/February forum should be scheduled – the committee must identify the

goal of the forum before a date is scheduled. The subcommittee will work on this further. Approval of Minutes

On a motion by Adam Chapdelaine seconded by Kate Loosian it was unanimously: Voted to approve the meeting minutes of October 2, 2018. On a motion by Adam Chapdelaine seconded by Kate Loosian it was unanimously: Voted to approve the meeting minutes of October 16, 2018. New Business

The schematic design work plan was reviewed with key decisions and dates identified. The finance subcommittee will present the framework for potential cost savings and value engineering ideas at the November 20th building committee meeting. Committee members will receive materials beforehand for review and an hour will be set aside at the meeting for said discussion. On a motion by Daniel Ruiz seconded by Kirsi Allison-Ampe it was unanimously: Voted to adjourn @ 9:15 p.m. Submitted by: Karen Tassone Recording Secretary AHS Building Committee [email protected]


Thursday November 8, 2018 Manager’s Conference Room-Town Hall Annex

4:00 p.m.

Agenda

Review Updated Budget Projections

Review Cost Impacts of Options Presented by HMFH

Discuss Potential Budget Reduction Strategies

Other Business


Communications Subcommittee Meeting Wednesday, November 14, 2018

Superintendent’s Office 3:00 – 4:30 p.m.

Agenda

Planning November 27 and future forums

Community Outreach update and planning

Process for tracking and responding to Emails


Old Business

New Business

AHS Building Committee, Communications Subcommittee Met 11/14/18 at 8:30am Present: Amy Speare (Chair), Kathy Bodie, Kirsi Allison-Ampe, Tobey Jackson, Julie Dunn, Jim Burrows (Skanska) and Victoria Clifford (Skanska) I. Planning Nov 27 and Future Forums

AS and KAA have drafted fall/winter forum plan. Nov 27 forum (weather date: Nov 28). Agenda:

o project update (including front green and sustainability) o feedback from community on exterior design o traffic study/plan o historic re-use concepts.

Survey will be released before forum and will be open for a week. KAA and AS will work

on developing survey

January forum - proposed date is January 14 (weather date: January 16).

o Hold at AHS in auditorium o offer tours beforehand to end at 7pm o Give project update, including exterior design decision. o Community gives feedback on interior core space designs and trade-offs. Use

range estimates for feedback on what could stay and what could be cut out of project.

o Community feedback survey to follow forum.

II. Community Outreach Update and Planning

35 parents at 11/9 Hardy coffee. More PTO events planned o 11/14 Peirce, Dallin 11/30 o More PTO coffees being scheduled. Dates TBD

True Story Theatre event happened on Nov 7. 12 community members attended. 25 attendees total

Town Hall is available to have easels and host a table on Thursdays in January/February from 5-7pm when Town Hall is open late

Town Hall glass cases are available for March Commision for Arts and Culture - co-chair emailed input to that has been shared with

committee Formal process is now in place for responding to ahsbuilding emails. Emails are going to

Skanska to respond.

Meeting adjourned at 4:45pm Next meeting: 11/26/18, 8:30am


Meeting Date: Tuesday, November 20, – 6:00 pm Location: AHS-School Committee Room-Sixth Floor

Agenda


2. Estimating Schedule Update 3. Exterior Design Review

4. Traffic Update

5. Memorials Committee

6. Finance Subcommittee Update

7. Communications Subcommittee Update

8. Sustainability Sub-committee Update


10. New Business

The listings of matters are those reasonably anticipated by the Chair which may

be discussed at the meeting. Not all items listed may in fact be discussed and other items not listed may also be brought up for discussion to the extent

permitted by law.

Approved December 5, 2018

Page 1 of 3

Arlington High School Building Committee Meeting Tuesday, November 20, 2018


Present: Jeff Thielman, School Committee Representative, Chair Kathleen Bodie, Superintendent, Co-vice chair Adam Chapdelaine, Town Manager, Co-vice chair Kirsi Allison-Ampe, School Committee Representative Francis Callahan, Community Member Representative John Cole, Chair, Permanent Town Building Committee Tobey Jackson, Community Member Representative Matthew Janger, AHS Principal Ryan Katofsky, Community Member Representative Kate Loosian, Community Member Representative William McCarthy, AHS Assistant Principal Steve Nesterak, Facilities Director (absent) Judson Pierce, Community Member Sandy Pooler, Deputy Town Manager Brian Rehrig, Capital Planning Committee Member Daniel Ruiz, Community Member Representative Amy Speare, Community Member Representative Shannon Knuth, Teacher Representative Kent Werst, Teacher Representative Also present: Jim Burrows, Victoria Clifford, Skanska Inc. Lori Cowles, Arthur Duffy, HMFH Architects, Inc. Call to order: 6:00 pm Public Participation Carl Wagner – stated that by placing the columns as part of the amphitheater does not feel like a compromise, requests that the committee seek ways to maintain the façade, green space and control the traffic situation. Ted Peluso – presented the committee a handout showcasing options to maintain memorials and historic items. Estimated Schedule Update Jim Burrows of Skanska updated the schematic design estimate schedule by a week stating that it must be submitted to MSBA ten business days before deadline. The change will require an email submission to MSBA by February 6. There was concern voiced that we are being too aggressive and overconfident with incoming estimates relative to being on budget. Mr. Burrows noted that estimates are expected to come in within a few percentage points of the budget. The updated schedule includes adding meetings on January 29th and 31st if needed. Exterior Design Review Lori Cowles of HMFH reviewed Parti = the general scheme of an architectural design floor plans and topography. The committee discussed:

floor plan progress


Page 2 of 3

a mezzanine for preschool and guidance security and assess to the building doorways and green roof auditorium access and exits media center (keeping it on one level)

Lori Cowles of HMFH informed the committee that the three designs to be presented reflect feedback from the committee on the exterior design. The central spine does not change in any of the options. Concept A:

Traditional Approach Considerations:

o Folks are looking at it from a higher perspective o Reuse / Remake of the columns

Steam wing façade is resembling Fusco Pop out of specialty spaces to create interest This option buries the auditorium to make the exterior more traditional Creates a forecourt Glazing in the interior entry? Or forecourt?

The committee questioned if after making the casting for columns could they be used decoratively thought-out? Yes, at a cost. Could A show an expressing of the auditorium, Does the angle of the auditorium effect the floorplan? Concept B:

Front columns are 1.5 stories high (tree level) Classroom pop-outs Would pop outs be on the inside of the two wings? Potentially. Front corners are turned out / major glazing (chorus room and science lab) Circle cut out in canopy seems like it would pool a lot of water / snow Potential to add windows in the Discourse Lab Lori suggests filtered light

Concept C No columns / Similar to B / no column entry Can the auditorium have an entrance / exit connecting to the front / creating a mini lobby Is there significant plan difference between b/c? Can the curve of the auditorium create a canopy for the entrance? Are there red flags as to why one of these options may be more expensive? Can we say the cost and timeline are equal? Yes.

Comments/concerns Is there anyway the façade can be attached to the building to make it more similar to the existing building? Concerned that the canopy in B could become a maintenance issue. Ron Alex from the audience commented that he was encouraged by the updated design, would like to see a design that incorporated the columns, roof and clock tower. Traffic Update Lori Cowles has reached out the Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC) to meet to discuss their Traffic Impact Analysis report for the high school project. The committee agreed that doing an analysis of what mitigation will be necessary at the Grove Street/DPW site is a warranted expense.


Page 3 of 3

On a motion by John Cole seconded by Frank Callahan it was unanimously: Voted to maintain the ability for a vehicular outlet to allow access from the high school site to Grove Street through the DPW. The Committee discussed existing and proposed vehicle circulation, as well as proposed pedestrian, sidewalk and bicycle circulation, usage of the back entrance and use of the fire lane on Mass. Ave. for live drop off. Memorials Committee Chairman Jeff Thielman informed the committee that he would like to establish a memorials subcommittee to inventory items on the high school site that need to be preserved. So Voted, moved by Adam Chapdelaine seconded Judson Peirce. Assistant Principal Bill McCarthy will chair the committee with appointees by the Veterans Committee and the Select Board. Any members interested in serving should be in touch with Mr. McCarthy. Finance Subcommittee Update Jim Burrows, Skanska, reviewed the Value Engineering document that outlined current and potential savings as well as:

Accepted VE items – Comptroller and Facilities. VE Items under review – IT Network and offices and Payroll Department. Items for Consideration if estimates required – square footage and sample building VE items Incremental estimates will be broken out. The subcommittee will further develop and review the items.

Communications Update Amy Speare reported that the next Community Forum will take place on November 27th at Town Hall and will cover the following:

Project update, exterior designs, historic reuse, and site plans. The goal is to receive feedback via survey with an on-line version available. The forum will be broadcast live through ACMI.

Sustainability Subcommittee Update Ryan Katofsky reported that he is coordinating schedules with the design team so that the next steps of the Accelerate Performance Program are synced with the Schematic Design Process. The design team will be starting energy modeling in December, and the SMEP subcommittee has also started compiling non-energy sustainability features to be included in the schematic design. Approval of Minutes On a motion by Brian Rehrig seconded by Adam Chapdelaine it was unanimously: Voted to approve the meeting minutes of November 6, 2018. New Business None On a motion by Kate Loosian seconded by Ryan Katofsky it was unanimously: Voted to adjourn @ 10:00 p.m. Submitted by: Karen Tassone Recording Secretary AHS Building Committee


Monday November 26, 2018 Superintendent’s Office

8:30 a.m.

♦ Nov 27 forum planning

♦ Community Survey Discussion

♦ Community Outreach planning

♦ Approval of 10/30/18 and 11/14/18 Meeting Minutes

♦ Old Business

♦ New Business


Present: Amy Speare (Chair), Kathy Bodie, Kirsi Allison-Ampe, Tobey Jackson, Julie Dunn, Joan Roman, and Victoria Clifford (by phone)

I. Planning Nov 28 Forum

Forum postponed from Nov 27. Messages will go out on school and town email lists,Patch, Arlington list, Facebook, websites, and Mailchimp

Survey reviewed and edited. Survey opens 11/27 and closes at 8pm on 12/2. Surveyresults will be analyzed in time to present to Building Committee on 12/4

11/28 forum plan was reviewed.

II. Community Outreach Update and Planning

Upcoming PTO presentations by Building Committee members Gibbs - Dec 13 Ottoson - Dec 14 Dallin - Nov 30 Thompson - Dec 7

III. Review and Approve Meeting Minutes

Motion to approve meeting minutes from 10/30/18 and 11/14/18 Motion by JD, 2nd by KAA. Approved 5-0

Meeting adjourned at 10am Next meeting: 12/20/18, 2:00pm

Arlington High School Building Committee Finance Subcommittee Meeting Thursday November 29, 2018

Manager’s Conference Room-Town Hall Annex 4:00 p.m.

Agenda

Continued Discussion on Updated Budget Projections

Discussion/Cost Impacts of Options Presented by HMFH

Discuss Potential Budget Reduction Strategies

Other Business


Meeting Date: Tuesday, December 4, – 6:00 pm Location: AHS-School Committee Room-Sixth Floor

Agenda


2. Exterior Design Direction Decision

3. CM at Risk Presentation

4. Potential Vote to Proceed with CM at Risk

5. Finance Subcommittee Update – VE Discussion Continued



8. New Business

The listings of matters are those reasonably anticipated by the Chair which may be discussed at the meeting. Not all items listed may in fact be discussed and other items not listed may also be brought up for discussion to the extent

permitted by law.


Arlington High School Building Committee Meeting Tuesday, December 4, 2018


Present: Jeff Thielman, School Committee Representative, Chair Kathleen Bodie, Superintendent, Co-vice chair Adam Chapdelaine, Town Manager, Co-vice chair Kirsi Allison-Ampe, School Committee Representative Francis Callahan, Community Member Representative John Cole, Chair, Permanent Town Building Committee (exited @ 8:50) Tobey Jackson, Community Member Representative Matthew Janger, AHS Principal Ryan Katofsky, Community Member Representative Kate Loosian, Community Member Representative William McCarthy, AHS Assistant Principal (absent) Steve Nesterak, Facilities Director (absent) Judson Pierce, Community Member Sandy Pooler, Deputy Town Manager Brian Rehrig, Capital Planning Committee Member (via phone) Daniel Ruiz, Community Member Representative (exited @ 8:50) Amy Speare, Community Member Representative Shannon Knuth, Teacher Representative (@7:45) Kent Werst, Teacher Representative (@7:30)

Also present: Jim Burrows, Victoria Clifford, Skanska Inc. Lori Cowles, Arthur Duffy, Melissa Greene HMFH Architects, Inc.

Call to order: 6:00 pm

Public Participation Gordon Jamieson enjoyed the community forum and favors the option B design. Eric Ammondson Elizabeth Terry Topher Heigham Mustafa

Communications Update Amy Speare and Kirsi Allison-Ampe reported on the Community Feedback on Schematic Design Concepts with the goals to:

• Gather community feedback on exterior design concepts, site plan and reuse/re-creation of historic elements

• Gather feedback from general community prior to the 12/4 Building Committee meeting • Continue to increase awareness about the project • Gather feedback from 1,000 community members

Demographics • 1,442 respondents, 3% responded at the forum, 97% online, 26 % attended the forum or watched

on ACMI, includes 57 teachers and 55 students.

Page 1 of 3

Approved December 18, 2018 High Level Summary

• Positive about Option A, Neutral about Options B & C

The complete survey results can be viewed at AHSBC_ Nov Feedback Summary.

Exterior Design Direction Decision Lori Cowles of HMFH presented to the committee The committee discussed at length the three options, each committee member shared their opinions about the exterior design options, highlighting elements they liked and disliked about each concept. After considering their own opinions and those of the community, the committee directed HMFH to pursue Option A, with the stipulation that more work needs to be done. While recognizing the community's desire for a traditional/historic facade, the committee requested modifications of the entrance (potentially including the columns and arches) to make the entrance more welcoming to students.

CM at Risk Presentation Jim Burrows of Skanska gave an overview of the CM at Risk presentation that explained:

• Construction Delivery Methods Defined • Design—Bid—Build vs. CM at Risk • The CM at Risk Advantage • CM at Risk Procurement Process

CM at Risk creates the opportunity to... o Hire a sophisticated, experienced team member based on qualifications o Save time on the schedule through fast tracking and pre-purchase o Design a "buildable" building with a great deal of thought about value, quality, durability and user

benefits o Manage the budget process and see all costs via open book accounting o Have a greater opportunity to select and prequalify subcontractors for the project resulting in

significant quality improvement o Reduce changes and claims through preconstruction involvement, design-to-budget, and effective

purchasing and scope delineation o Engage in a positive and collaborative design and construction process o Gain an advocate looking out for your interests

The Committee was in agreement that the construction manager at risk method was the best option for the high school project. The presentation can be found at CM at Risk Presentation

Potential Vote to Proceed with CM at Risk On a motion by Daniel Ruiz seconded by Sandy Pooler it was unanimously: Voted that the AHS Building Committee directs Skanska, Inc. to notify the Inspector General's office of our intent to enter into a contract with a construction management at risk film.

Finance Subcommittee Update Town Manager Adam Chapdelaine reported that the subcommittee continues to work on value engineering to identify cost saving items. The Comptroller's office and Facilities Department are expected to move to Department of Public Works with a cost savings of $4 million. The finance and communications subcommittees will work together to further refine the VE list. The Town Manager will work to finalize the apples to apples comparisons for Waltham, Somerville and Belmont high school.

Page 2 of 3

() 11(/),\11,

NUM!,

4.1ilimiyitmato,


Communications Subcommittee Update The community forum is scheduled for January 14th with a snow date of January 16t1i at the Town Hall. The date for another community tour of Arlington High School has yet to be determined.

Approval of Minutes On a motion by Adam Chapdelaine seconded by Frank Callahan it was unanimously: Voted to approve the meeting minutes of November 20, 2018.

New Business In response to concerns regarding the loss of the soccer and lacrosse practice fields Lori Cowles will bring to the next meeting an option with less parking that includes the practice fields.

On a motion by Kate Loosian seconded by Ryan Katofsky it was unanimously: Voted to adjourn @ 9:40 pm

Submitted by:

Karen Tassone Recording Secretary AHS Building Committee [email protected]

A True Copy Attest

Karen Tassone

Page 3 of 3

2/14/2019

1

Confidential

Public School Construction in MA

CM at Risk Delivery Method

Arlington High School Building Committee Date

1

Presentation Overview

− Construction Delivery Methods Defined

− Comparison of Design–Bid–Build vs. CM at Risk

− The CM at Risk Advantage

− CM at Risk Procurement Process

Public School Construction in MA – CM at Risk Delivery Method

2/14/2019

2

Construction Delivery Methods Defined

Types of Construction Delivery Methods:

Design – Bid – Build (Chapter 149)

Construction Management at Risk (Chapter 149A)

Design – Build (Public Works Projects)

Construction Management Agency (Not Used in MA)

2Public School Construction in MA – CM at Risk Delivery Method


Design-Bid-Build (D-B-B)

– “Traditional approach” for construction of schools

– Project designed by a team of Architects and Engineers to 100% Construction Documents

– Once plans are completed, bids are solicited from General Contractors and Trade Contractors

– A complete set of design documents is finished before the builder becomes involved

– Low “responsive” bidder is awarded project

– Contract is based on a “Lump Sum” amount


2/14/2019

3


Owner/ OPM

GeneralContractor

Architect/Engineers

Trade ContractorSelf Perform Trade Contractor Subcontractor Subcontractor

Design-Bid-Build (D-B-B)



Construction Manager at Risk (CM at Risk)

- Hired early in design process

- CM at Risk provides design phase and preconstruction services

- CM at Risk becomes builder of project (Contractor)

- CM at Risk has ability to “drive” the entire process

- Owner participates in Trade and Subcontractor selections

- Option for phased or fast-track schedule

- Contract is based on “Guaranteed Maximum Price” (GMP)

- Open book accounting


2/14/2019

4


Construction Management at Risk (CM at Risk)

Owner/ OPM

Architect

Consultant

ConstructionManager

Consultant

Subcontractor

Trade Contractor


Lump Sum vs. Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP)

Comparison of D-B-B vs. CM at Risk

Guaranteed Maximum Price

− Based on bids for work packages, general conditions, contingency and set fee

− Essentially a “cost-plus” contract with guaranteed maximum

− Final price is based on actual bids received, amount of contingency used, and agreed upon general conditions/fee

− Any savings on actual costs revert to the owner

− All items of GMP are negotiable with the exception of the CM fee and Trade Contractor Bids

− Can include allowances for work that is unclear or undefined to ensure no financial surprises

Lump Sum

− Based on cost of the work, general conditions and desired profit of GC

− Price fixed at lump sum bid amount with additions for change orders

− Price based on “plans and specs”, or exactly what is indicated on contract documents. GCs look at documents as “black and white”

− Savings on actual costs below the bid “lump sum” amount become contractor profit

− No opportunity or incentive for negotiation


2/14/2019

5

Design-Bid-Build


Disadvantages• Linear process means longer schedule duration

than other methods

• “Hard” price not established until bids are received; may require redesign and rebid if bids exceed budget.

• Not a schedule or budget driven process

• No builder input in design, planning or budgets

• The designer may have limited ability to assess scheduling and cost ramifications as the design is developed which can lead to a more costly final product

• Quality of Trade contractors and subcontractors not assured

• Fosters adversarial relationships between all parties and increases probability of disputes

• Prone to changes and claims which may increase final project cost


Advantages• Familiar delivery method

• Simpler process to manage

• Fully defined project scope for construction

• Lowest price proposed and accepted; pricing, including contractor fee and overhead, secured competitively; “best price”

• Owner can completely control design

• BEST SUITED FOR: less complicated projects that are budget sensitive but are not schedule sensitive and not subject to change.



Advantages• Construction Manager selected based on

qualifications, experience and proposed team rather than low cost

• Design phase assistance with budgeting, planning and constructability results in ability to influence outcome by addressing issues early

• Early cost estimates and feedback to help in the design development process resulting in a more accurate cost model

• Fast Track schedule delivery possible

• Team concept with owner and designer

• BEST SUITED FOR: new or renovation projects that are schedule sensitive, difficult to define or subject to potential changes; also for projects requiring a high level of construction oversight due to multi phases, technical complexity or multi-discipline coordination

Disadvantages• Requires an OPM or Owner with an

understanding of experience in CM at Risk process and GMP mechanics

• Difficult for the Owner to evaluate the GMP and determine if best price achieved

• Potential for higher up front cost due to “filling holes” in scope and/or documents (with result of eliminating future change orders and associated delays)

• Potential adversarial relationship when design intent is challenged when “design-to-budget” or “price cutting” is pushed

• Owner or OPM must be versed in pricing negotiations

CM at Risk

2/14/2019

6

57%

38%

5%Reduce ProjectSchedule

Reduce Project Cost

Reduce Claims

The CM at Risk Advantage

Courtesy – PinnacleOne U.S Public Construction Survey


57%

38%

5%Reduce ProjectSchedule

Reduce Project Cost

Reduce Claims

Key Drivers− Team Approach

− Cost Factors

− Schedule Considerations

− Subcontracting

− Quality


Team Approach

− CM at Risk Process is based on relationships and teamwork

− CM at Risk motivation is project success because future work is solely tied to references and past experience

− Cost reimbursement structure and fixed fee promotes CM at Risk as advocate of owner


2/14/2019

7


Cost Factors− Fee set at time of contract. Therefore, there is no motivation for

CM at Risk to “inflate” costs because savings revert to owner

− GC is motivated to find “holes” in documents to reduce bid amount and make up with later change orders

− CM at Risk’s involvement in preconstruction is to assist design team in maintaining budget and optimizing value/constructability

− Continuous budget feedback and control

− Open book accounting and purchasing

− Ability to obtain GMP earlier in process than traditional bid

− More ability to handle change in design and scope

− Minimizes changes and claims once in construction



Schedule Considerations− Builder’s viewpoint on “how to build” for planning and logistics

integrated into design

− Opportunity for fast-tracking and pre-purchase of equipment

− Design-phase input allows for facilitation of biddable fast-track package documents

Traditional Approach

Bidding

Schedule Savings

Fast Track Approach

ConstructionDesign

Design Construction


Bidding

2/14/2019

8


Subcontracting− CM at Risk leads subcontractor bidding and manages bid process

− CM at Risk involvement in prequalification of Trade Contractors

− Allows owner “screening” of subs through review of bid lists and qualifications

− Significant bid coverage for all trades due to CM at Risk relationships in marketplace

− With GC process, Filed Sub-Bidders do not know who GC is at time of bidding

− Ability for CM at Risk to create specific scopes of work for subcontractors as basis for bidding

− Early involvement and knowledge of project helps CM at Risk mitigate gaps in purchased scope

− Ability to perform “scope debriefs” to ensure bidder understanding of documents and expectations



Quality

− CM Selection process is based on qualifications, experience, proposed team and success on past projects

− Lump Sum process promotes cost cutting to increase profit

− With General Contracting, heavy owner involvement is required to ensure no “cutting corners” on quality

− GC bids are based on “plans and specs” with no opportunity for scope clarification

− CM early involvement in project leads to greater understanding of complex logistics and design details

− Review of constructability during design phase utilizes builder’s knowledge of means and methods and subcontractor abilities to ensure a design that will result in a “buildable” high quality product


2/14/2019

9

Massachusetts Construction Reform

Chapter 149A

− Allows for the use of CM at Risk for building contracts of $5 Million or more

− Requirement for advance approval by the Office of the Inspector General (IOG) to use CM at Risk

− Two phase process for selecting CM: Prequalification & Proposal

− Two part proposal: Technical and Price

− Agency contracts with highest ranked firm with which committee concludes successful “non-fee” negotiations

− Office of the Inspector General (IOG) October, 2009 Report to the Legislature on CM at Risk and Construction Reform.http://www.mass.gov/ig/creform/refinfo.htm


CM at Risk Procurement Process

Criteria for Inspector General approvalThe Office of the Inspector General will issue a Notice to Proceed when the public agency has demonstrated that:

a. The public agency has authorization from its governing body to enter into a contract with a construction management at risk firm. The authorization shall include the results of any public vote if applicable.

b. The public agency has the capacity, a plan and procedures in place and approved of by the governing body, where appropriate, to effectively procure and manage construction management at-risk services for the specific project and has retained the services of a qualified owner's project manager.

c. The public agency has in place procedures to ensure fairness in competition, evaluation and reporting of results at every stage in the procurement process.

d. The building project has an estimated construction value of $5,000,000 or more.

e. The public agency has determined that the use of construction management at risk services is appropriate for the building project and states in writing the reasons for the determination.”


2/14/2019

10

CM at Risk Procurement Process

District Engagement in Procurement Process

1. Establish prequalification committee (OPM, Designer, at least two public representatives)

2. Prepare and advertise RFQ

3. Evaluate responses and prequalify at least three CM at Risk Firms

4. Establish a selection committee (can be same as prequalification committee)

5. Prepare RFP and distribute to prequalified firms

6. Receive, evaluate and rank proposals (interviews are permitted if conducted with all proposers)

7. Negotiate non-fee terms with selected proposer and award contract


In Summary

CM at Risk creates the opportunity to…− Hire a sophisticated, experienced team member based on

qualifications

− Save time on the schedule through fast tracking and pre-purchase

− Design a “buildable” building with a great deal of thought about value, quality, durability and user benefits

− Manage the budget process and see all costs via open book accounting

− Have a greater opportunity to select and prequalify subcontractors for the project resulting in significant quality improvement

− Reduce changes and claims through preconstruction involvement, design-to-budget, and effective purchasing and scope delineation

− Engage in a positive and collaborative design and construction process

− Gain an advocate looking out for your interests



Thursday December 6, 2018 Manager’s Conference Room-Town Hall Annex

4:00 p.m.

Agenda

♦ Budget Update

♦ Project Benchmarking Discussion

♦ VE Discussion

♦ Project Budget Items For Communications Sub-committee

AHS Building Finance Subcommittee Meeting December 6, 2018

Town Manager’s Conference Room Meeting Notes

Attendees: Adam Chapdelaine, Town Manager, Vice-chair AHS Building Committee Sandy Pooler, Deputy Town Manager, member AHS Building Committee John Cole, member AHS Building Committee Brian Rehrig, Capital Planning Committee, member AHS Building Committee Kate Loosian, member AHS Building Committee Amy Speare, member AHS Building Committee Jim Burrows, Skanska – Owners Project Manager Victoria Clifford, Skanska

Jim discusses the updated Total Project Budget form (3011)

- Hazmat / Geotech are big buckets items- Keeping 3% and 6% construction contingency- Who carries the builder’s insurance?

o Jim suggests that the district takes out their own insurance- Does the town want to outsource legal fee’s?- Swing Space / Modular – we are currently carrying $0

o Q: If the phasing plan is shifted, do we want to carry an allowance? A: Yes, and value is to be determined

Cost Discussion (“Cost Tradeoffs Analysis” + “Skanska VE Sheet”)

- Amy and Kirsi put together a spreadsheet titled “Cost Tradeoffs Analysis”o The concept of the sheet is to show in more detail how we got from the PSR estimates to

the SD estimates- How do we explain Arlington High Schools RFP estimate compared to other districts?

o Jim to send a list of his findings of RFP values for similar projects- Amy asks Jim and Victoria to assist the communications subcommittee in writing a high- level

overview of the estimating process- Q: When will the estimates become concrete?

o A: After reconciliation and VE of the SD estimates- Residents are asking for impact on taxes for homeowner and condo.- Sandy asks for ballpark construction phasing cost

��

0HHWLQJ�'DWH� 0RQGD\��'HFHPEHU�� ± ��± ��SP�/RFDWLRQ� $+6�6FKRRO� &RPPLWWHH�5RRP�6L[WK� )ORRU

��

�� 5HYLHZ�HQHUJ\�PRGHOLQJ�DVVXPSWLRQV

��'LVFXVV�QRQ�HQHUJ\� VXVWDLQDELOLW\� IHDWXUHV

dŚĞ�ůŝƐƚŝŶŐƐ�ŽĨ�ŵĂƚƚĞƌƐ�ĂƌĞ�ƚŚŽƐĞ�ƌĞĂƐŽŶĂďůǇ�ĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚ�ďǇ�ƚŚĞ��ŚĂŝƌ�ǁŚŝĐŚ�ŵĂǇ�ďĞ�ĚŝƐĐƵƐƐĞĚ�Ăƚ�ƚŚĞ�ŵĞĞƚŝŶŐ͘��EŽƚ�Ăůů�ŝƚĞŵƐ�ůŝƐƚĞĚ�ŵĂǇ�ŝŶ�ĨĂĐƚ�ďĞ�ĚŝƐĐƵƐƐĞĚ�ĂŶĚ�ŽƚŚĞƌ� ŝƚĞŵƐ�ŶŽƚ�ůŝƐƚĞĚ�ŵĂǇ�ĂůƐŽ�ďĞ�ďƌŽƵŐŚƚ�ƵƉ�ĨŽƌ�ĚŝƐĐƵƐƐŝŽŶ�ƚŽ�ƚŚĞ�ĞǆƚĞŶƚ�ƉĞƌŵŝƚƚĞĚ�ďǇ�ůĂǁ͘��


Dec 10, 2018, 2:30-5:00pm Skanska Meeting Notes – Recorded by Victoria Clifford and reviewed by Ryan Katofsky In Attendance: Ryan Katofsky, Lori Cowles (HMFH), Rob Diemer (InPosse), Brendan Giza-Sisson (Eversource), Ken Pruitt (Town Energy Manager), Rachel Oliveri (APS Sustainability Coordinator), Victoria Clifford (Skanska), Stephanie MacNeil (HMFH), Kevin Settlemyre, Kevin Caddle (Bala) Focus: Define how the Accelerated Program will need to run with the Energy Model submission Town Energy Manager, Ken Pruitt – noted that Alternative Energy Credits from the 2016 MA energy bill should be available and we may be able to pre-mint them and take them as a credit against the first cost. How would that affect the MSBA’s reimbursements? -- Ken Pruitt to follow up with more information. MSBA project advisory 54 provides some info on AECs InPosse Presentation

- Designing for high performance o Reduce loads o Passive systems (harvest what is free) o Optimize active systems o Use only what is needed o Enable users to achieve energy goals

- Investing in high performance o Best investment is high performance and long life

- Project Goals: o Electric HVAC or the option of converting to all electric o Question from In Posse: How will we be procuring the renewable energy? Are

we limited to what the third party wants to invest in. Example: what will we get out of maximizing the roof area for photovoltaics for a PPA. Ryan says he will look for the limitations in the current PPA for existing rooftop photovoltaics. Ken (town energy manager) to follow up. We also need to know limitation due to phasing of construction. Ken to schedule call with AMERESCO – Ryan and Jim Burrows would be good to have on the call

- Belmont Current Energy Model: o 100% geothermal hitting 34 EUI o Uses less energy to move water than air o Changes to the envelope are influencing the cooling and heating o Next couple of weeks are critical to decide the increments on the MEP approach –

not just the annual energy but the performance of the envelope / types of mechanical systems

o Belmont site does not have contamination – GSHP costs are lower than Arlington’s cost

o Space for 400 wells has been identified for AHS - in design development is when we will start to schedule test wells

- Building Model Parameters: o Building geometry / envelope o Internal loads o HVAC o Domestic water heating o Control strategies and setpoints o Building utilization schedules

- Important to note that not one program has been the same – but InPosse has seen each of our program elements in school projects within the last three years

- how many classrooms / areas are engaged in the full year schedule? – We still need a deeper understanding on how the community ed program will evolve in the new building – still an unknown from Lori

- Model will run on two assumptions – capability and usage (InPosse needs to know about the usage)

- Assuming that some plug loads will be on separate circuits that can be switched off.

- Building Geometry o Using image of design “Concept C” which was voted down by the committee –

we should follow up that the energy model will study “Concept A” (west facing glazing might not be beneficial for the project)

- Envelope Performance o Glass performance? Need HMFH to confirm o Glass application? Need HMFH to confirm (example: curtain wall is lower

performing) o Arthur Duffy has a chart of the Baseline / alternates (HMFH to share) o HMFH & InPosse need a better understanding of windows o MSBA hires the commissioning agent:

Can we depend on the MSBA commissioning agent to study the envelope? Group says that it’s critical and we will need to follow up on how it fits in to the process. Because it is critical for the performance of the entire building and the longevity of the structure, we may want additional envelope commisisoning. SKANSKA to follow up.

- Question on lighting (Not recorded)– Belmont will be used as a comparison - Need to decide on mechanical systems – not a deciding factor today (time constraint) - We will need to have good estimate on the geothermal - Ryan - do we need to include an option using no geothermal or all electric (and

gradations of each)? Is that a good solution? – InPosse thinks no. - Energy modeling will help determine if different ECMs can help driver down peak loads

enough so can get savings from fewer/smaller mechanical systems, e.g., 2 chilled beams instead of 3 per classroom.

Questions:

- Will the entire facility be fully air conditioned when occupied?

o Push from the full committee has been yes. In Posse mentions that stairs with glazing can become hot spots. Lori follows up that the building is designed to have stairwells with glazing to make the building feel more open

- Should the design optimize opportunities for natural ventilation / cooling? (should we optimize natural air?)

o How far do we want to go? o Options: window interlocks / messaging / ceiling fans / cross ventilation

opportunities o Do you want to encourage natural ventilations or not? o Lori believes that the PR campaign of the school has been that there will be air

conditioning


Meeting Date: Tuesday, December 18, – 6:00 pm Location: AHS-School Committee Room-Sixth Floor

Agenda


2. Site Design Direction Decision

3. Security Design Progress

4. Geotechnical/geo-environmental update


6. Sustainability Subcommittee Update



9. New Business

The listings of matters are those reasonably anticipated by the Chair which may

be discussed at the meeting. Not all items listed may in fact be discussed and other items not listed may also be brought up for discussion to the extent

permitted by law.

Approved January 8, 2019

Page 1 of 3

Arlington High School Building Committee Meeting Tuesday, December 18, 2018


Present: Jeff Thielman, School Committee Representative, Chair (@7:30) Kathleen Bodie, Superintendent, Co-vice chair (exited @ 7:30) Adam Chapdelaine, Town Manager, Co-vice chair (@ 8:00) Kirsi Allison-Ampe, School Committee Representative Francis Callahan, Community Member Representative John Cole, Chair, Permanent Town Building Committee Tobey Jackson, Community Member Representative Matthew Janger, AHS Principal Ryan Katofsky, Community Member Representative Kate Loosian, Community Member Representative William McCarthy, AHS Assistant Principal (absent) Steve Nesterak, Facilities Director (absent) Judson Pierce, Community Member (absent) Sandy Pooler, Deputy Town Manager Brian Rehrig, Capital Planning Committee Member (via phone) Daniel Ruiz, Community Member Representative Amy Speare, Community Member Representative Shannon Knuth, Teacher Representative (@ 7:10) Kent Werst, Teacher Representative Also present: Jim Burrows, Victoria Clifford, Skanska Inc. Lori Cowles, Arthur Duffy, Melissa Greene HMFH Architects, Inc. Call to order: 6:00 pm Public Participation Leba Heigham – thanked the committee for their continued work and requested that during the

security design process the committee looks at preparing for security extremes. Carl Wagner – thanked the committee for their review, would not support an option without

maintaining the front green, suggested plan B should be discussed and maintained, that the design to date is "the wrong solution for right problem.”

Ted Peluso – reviewed the content on the AHS building website dated from 2016. Urged the committee to get the job done, that $100 million cannot be turned down, and continue with getting approval from Town Meeting and Town residents.

Elizabeth Terry – commented that any compromise on lawn and façade would be appreciated by former AHS graduates.

Schematic Design

Floor plan progress – developing floor plans were presented to the committee. Site Design Direction Decision Lori Cowles presented two site design options to the committee. Plan A provides for 254 parking spaces including the location of play areas for the preschool and daycare.


Page 2 of 3

Plan B reduces parking to 227 parking spaces and allows for more green but would mean the preschool daycare play structure would be located across the street. The committee discussed both options in response to questions relative to the elimination of the basketball courts. Lori reported that universally the staff (Admin., AD, Principal) do not want the courts and concluded that they would not be needed for school activities. Concerns over the preschool and daycare drop off and play structure being across the street in option B were also discussed. The decision will be left to the preschool director.

As to whether there will be access to AHS from Grove Street or the installation of a light at Mill Street, Lori Cowles reported that they will meet with the Transportation Advisory Committee and pursue further analysis before making a recommendation.

On a motion by John Cole, seconded by Matthew Janger it was unanimously: Voted to support Arlington High School Site Plan B presented by HMFH that includes 227 parking spaces and offers optimal field space. Security Design Progress Lori Cowles.explained that the security team met and discussed the following:

smart security cameras –for exterior with thermal imaging video surveillance –monitoring by exception exterior coverage: fields, parking, building perimeter interior coverage: corridors, stairs, large spaces access control: entry vestibule, card access, student ID card, video intercom

Emergency Generator

The generator is for emergency use not emergency “shelter” The generator includes: emergency lighting, exit signs, fire alarm, telephone equipment, security

system, IT equipment, kitchen walk-ins. Emergency use includes: lighting, ventilation, outlets in athletics wing/cafeteria/ kitchen/ main

spine/lobby Geotechnical/geo-environmental update Lori reported that pre-characterization of soil and further existing foundation work is ongoing. Crews will be back on site during school break. Finance Subcommittee Update – VE Discussion Continued The subcommittee continues to have ongoing conversations on VE items, incremental reductions have been added. Discussion included: Adam Chapdelaine will meet with the DPW Director informing him that the IT Department will

definitely be moving to the DPW. All of the items on the VE list were in the educational plan voted on by this committee. The School Committee is not interested in making any recommendations at this point and will be

discussing the project during the next few meetings. The Town Manager has authorized a space study of the Parmenter School.


Page 3 of 3

Sustainability Subcommittee Update Ryan Katofsky presented a PowerPoint on Energy Modeling and discussed the following:

High Performance Design Project Goals Energy and Use Energy Model Parameters Internal Loads Building Occupancy/Utilization Schedule Continuous Improvement Recommendations

The Sustainability Subcommittee will meet before the January 22nd meeting to determine what level will work for this project. Communications Subcommittee Update The subcommittee meeting is scheduled for December 20th to discuss the January 14th Community Forum. Community wide tours of Arlington High School is scheduled for January 9 th. The subcommittee is also working on a series of blogs. Approval of Minutes On a motion by Kate Loosian, seconded by Adam Chapdelaine it was unanimously Voted to approve the meeting minutes of December 4, 2018. New Business None On a motion by Adam Chapdelaine, seconded by Ryan Katofsky it was unanimously: Voted to adjourn @ 8:25 p.m. Submitted by: Karen Tassone Recording Secretary AHS Building Committee [email protected]


Thursday, December 20, 2018 Superintendent’s Office

2:00 p.m.

♦ January 14th Forum Planning

♦ Development of Cost and Budget Materials & Blogs

♦ Approval Meeting Minutes

♦ Old Business

♦ New Business

AHS Building Committee, Communications Subcommittee Met 12/20/18 at 2:00pm

Present: Amy Speare (Chair), Kathy Bodie, Kirsi Allison-Ampe, Tobey Jackson, Julie Dunn, Joan Roman, and Victoria Clifford

I. Planning Jan 14 Forum

● Forum agenda drafted by AS was reviewed.● Goal of forum is to educate. Feedback will not be sought on cost cutting

decisions/prioritization. It will be communicated that school administration will ultimatelymake decisions if programs components need to be cut due to budget constraints.

● Blog handouts will be available● Save the date reminder will go out before holidays● AS will work on announcement for forum to be released on Jan 3

II. Other Planned Community Events● Tours Jan 9 at 7pm● Town Hall table is reserved for Jan/Feb, 2019. Building committee will be there for four

Thursdays - Jan 10, Jan 24, Feb 7, Feb 28● AS booking times to present to PTO’s for after Feb 5

III. Review and Approve Meeting Minutes

Motion to approve meeting minutes from 11/26/18 Motion by TJ, 2nd by JR. Approved 5-0

Meeting adjourned at 3:30pm Next meeting: 1/9/19, 8:30am


Thursday, January 8, 2019 Superintendent’s Office

8:30 a.m.


Wednesday, January 9, 2019 Superintendent’s Office

8:30 a.m.

♦ January 14 forum planning

♦ January/February community outreach

♦ Approve meeting minutes from 12/20/18

♦ Old Business

♦ New Business


Meeting Date: Tuesday, January 8, 2019 – 6:00 pm Location: AHS-School Committee Room-Sixth Floor

Agenda


2. “Other” Program Updates

3. Civil Site Design Progress

4. Phasing/ Temporary Use Progress

5. Interior Core Spaces Presentation





10. New Business




Page 1 of 3

Arlington High School Building Committee Meeting Tuesday, January 8, 2019


Present: Jeff Thielman, School Committee Representative, Chair Kathleen Bodie, Superintendent, Co-vice chair Adam Chapdelaine, Town Manager, Co-vice chair Kirsi Allison-Ampe, School Committee Representative Francis Callahan, Community Member Representative John Cole, Chair, Permanent Town Building Committee Tobey Jackson, Community Member Representative Matthew Janger, AHS Principal Ryan Katofsky, Community Member Representative Kate Loosian, Community Member Representative Michael Mason APS Chief Financial Officer William McCarthy, AHS Assistant Principal Steve Nesterak, Facilities Director (absent) Judson Pierce, Community Member Sandy Pooler, Deputy Town Manager Brian Rehrig, Capital Planning Committee Member Daniel Ruiz, Community Member Representative Amy Speare, Community Member Representative Shannon Knuth, Teacher Representative Kent Werst, Teacher Representative Also present: Jim Burrows, Victoria Clifford, Skanska Inc. Lori Cowles, Arthur Duffy, Melissa Greene HMFH Architects, Inc. Call to order: Chair Jeff Thielman called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. and welcomed to the committee Michael Mason, newly appointed Chief Financial Officer for Arlington Public Schools. Public Participation Gordon Jameison – stated that he agreed with VE list that shows Town Offices removed from the high project, but is against all other reductions at this time. He also stressed the importance of the Math and Sciences. “Other” Program Updates As requested, Lori Cowles, presented a space and cost analysis of the Parmenter School to house Menotomy Preschool temporarily during high school construction only and then permanently and in addition to show costs to house District Administration Offices permanently there.

Three options were presented to house the preschool temporarily, all options have space program deficits of undersized classrooms and toilets:

Option 1 without an elevator = $1,858,523 Option 1A with an inside elevator = $2,758,998 Option 1B with an outside elevator = $2,948,973


Page 2 of 3

To consider a permanent placement of the preschool, ACC the current resident (whose lease runs through June 2024) would need to vacate in June 2019 for construction to begin. Total project cost for permanent placement would be $13,125,000

District Offices permanently placed at Parmenter will cost approximately $9,000,000 versus the approximate cost of $7,000,000 to remain as part of the high school project. This option does not provide enough space for the school committee conference room 1,000 square feet versus the current 1,500 square feet, provides no parking and the Town will lose the space as rental income.

On a motion by John Cole seconded by Kate Loosian it was moved That the AHS Building Committee direct the architect (HMFH) to proceed with option 1A for the temporary relocation of Menotomy Preschool during construction, further that the building committee set aside further discussion of moving district administration offices to the Parmenter school. Amended by Kirsi Allison-Ampe that Menotomy Preschool will not be placed permanently at the Parmenter School. Unanimous vote. John Cole recommended that the Town consider first offers for the properties on Schouler Court if they become available for sale. On a motion by Kate Loosian seconded by John Cole it was unanimously: Voted to request that Skanska will create a document that shows the costs of modulars for Menotomy Preschool vs renovation of the Parmenter School. Civil Site Design Progress Arthur Duffy of HMFH presented the Site Utilities plans for Phases one through four identifying the required utility work during each phase (i.e. new water and gas, science water and sewer lines). He also gave a geo-environmental update that identified geothermal well locations on the site. Phasing/ Temporary Use Progress Lori Cowles presented to the committee the preliminary phasing plans. Interior Core Spaces Presentation Melissa Greene (HMFH) presented interior core spaces of the STEAM Wing and the Performing Arts and Athletic Wings. Finance Subcommittee Update – VE Discussion Continued Jim Burrows, Skanska, presented the MSBA Project Benchmark document that showed and compared the scale, scope, schedule, complexity, cost per square foot and per pupil costs with Waltham, Belmont, Saugus and Somerville projects that equals an apple to apple comparison. After discussion Skanska will revise the document to add a line with AHS cost escalation and include Minuteman cost escalation. Skanska and HMFH will meet on January 29th to reconcile the estimates, there will be any VE

decisions made at that time. The building committee will meet the evening of the 29 th to review the estimates for the first time.

The School Committee will meet on January 30 to review and give input if any reductions are necessary. The building committee will meet again on January 31st to further review the estimates with school committee input.


Page 3 of 3

Sustainability Subcommittee Update Ryan Katofsky reported that he is waiting for the results of the energy modeling, they should be available within the next few days. Communications Subcommittee Update Amy Speare reported that the AHS building tours and an informal Q & A will take place on Wednesday, January 9th beginning at 7:00 pm.

AHS Building Committee Community Forum is scheduled for Monday, January 14 th at 7:00 pm at the Town Hall. The forum will be informational only that will include a project update (site, sustainability, project costs and questions and answers).

AHS Building project materials will be on view at the Town Hall Lobby. Approval of Minutes On a motion by Adam Chapdelaine seconded by Frank Callahan it was: Voted to approve the meeting minutes of December 18, 2018 (abstention by Daniel Ruiz). New Business None On a motion by Brian Rehrig seconded by Adam Chapdelaine it was unanimously: Voted to adjourn @ 8:40 p.m. Submitted by: Karen Tassone Recording Secretary AHS Building Committee [email protected]



Tuesday January 22, 2019 Arlington High School -School Committee Room

5:00 p.m.

Agenda

Review MSBA 3011 Total Project Budget

Discussion of Cost Estimation Process

Discussion of Value Engineering

Other Business

Finance Subcommittee 1/22/19

Meeting Minutes

Recorded by: Victoria Clifford, Skanska

In Attendance:

Adam Chapdelaine, Sandy Pooler, John Cole, Michael Mason, Kate Loosian, Brian Rehrig (by phone)

Jim Burrows, Victoria Clifford, Skanska

Jim gives an update on the Budget Packet:

- Adam approved the invoices (no formal motion or vote)

The Finance Committee Reviewed the Total Project Budget Form (3011) provided by Skanska:

Skanska met internally and went through every line item, then we met with HMFH to review

Skanska has compared this to other project budgets – Using historical data from other districts

Skanska included all approved incentives which bring the MSBA reimbursement rate to 49.72%

Q: Where Builders Risk is carried?

o A: In the CM at Risk contract – right now it’s a placeholder fee, but it’s up to negotiation

with the CM at Risk – if we go over, we can pull from the Owner’s Contingency

HMFH is carrying a fee of 9.5% - how the buckets for their fee gets allocated, may be shuffled

Q: Line 29. Admin Costs – Do we need to consider bonding council?

o A: Sandy: Typically, when we issue bonds, there is a premium which we can use to off

balance

o A: Skanska to look at what other districts have done

Q: Line 35 - “Other Basic Reimbursables Services” –Is commissioning factored in to that?

o A: Yes.

Line 36 – This is a large bucket of money. We’ve reviewing against a breakdown of services from

the geotechnical engineers

Q: Line 33. Why is there no money allocated for Construction Testing?

o A: It’s carried below in the Testing /Services line.

Line 40. Traffic – this is the all in number to perform the work that TACT requested

Q: Line 43: IS the Fee negotiated? What is the timeline of the scope?

o A: The fee is negotiated. You will typically be a percentage of construction cost. This

scope will bring you to the end of Design Development – 100% Construction Documents.

Line 104. Utility Company Fees – Skanska based this budget off historical data /

recommendations from HMFH.

Line 105. Testing Services – this is all your basic services plus a contingency for preconstruction

testing

Line 106. Swing Space / Modular – We are getting a quote from a modular company to base this

from. Right now, or phasing plan calls for no modulars, but we don’t want to leave this budget

item empty

Skanska has factored in hiring a move manager

FF&E – We worked with HMFH to get this budget to be as realistic as possible. FF&E

reimbursement from MSBA is always short due to the small cap. Some projects want to carry

extra FF&E costs in the Owners contingency, we are proponents to carry it within the FF&E line

item

o Q: What if we don’t use up this whole budget?

A: We would then submit a BBR to move the money to a different line item –

but it will affect the reimbursement rate

Jim has new information from Lori that the Total GSF to 413,300 (Not 412,000 as show on

handout) – Skanska will update this info

Jim explains that we can decrease the contingency as the project goes on and bump it into the

construction cost

Within the Construction cost there is a GMP and Design Contingency which is based on the PSR

estimate

Q: (John Cole) Can we take the new budget and carry it through the benchmark exercise?

o A: Yes. Skanska will do work on this.

Q: (Adam) Why are there two different reimbursable rates?

o A: Skanska to follow up

Q: (Adam) Line 134. how do you differentiate the two total maximum facilities grants?

o A: (Jim) There is an assumption that some change orders may be reimbursable –

Skanska to confirm

Next Steps:

o Q: Schedule a call for Thursday?

A: Adam – we should keep it flexible

o Next Tuesday, Skanska will present the total project budget and estimate summary – it

will be public and final

o Committee will have then have the opportunity to VE

o Finance committee suggests hiding the right had calculations on the 3011 sheet to avoid

confusion/have the sheet be as clean as possible

o Adam asks that Jim is prepared to explain how the calculations work on the 3011. Also

mentions that it will be important to note that the excluded and reimbursables will be

negotiaed with the MSBA

Further Questions/Requests for Skanska:

Q: Will the notes of the bottom half of the sheet be populated?

o A: Yes.

Q: What is Skanska’s process in reviewing the Total Project Budget? Will you have more eyes on

this document?

o Yes, we will have an internal audit with our full project team

Q: When the office spaces were taken out, which bucket was it taken from?

o A: The construction costs line item, but we kept the mark ups the same

Request: (Brian) Requests a built-in explanation of the Overall Excluded Construction Cost/

Construction Costo Skanska will make a side table on the right that breaks this out

Updates Parmenter Analysis – Cost Factors

- We cleaned up the table Adam previously sent out to the SBC

- Adam approved this document and asks Skanska to distribute it to the full building committee



Agenda


2. Exterior Design Review

3. DPW Project Update





8. New Business



Page 1 of 7



Present: Jeff Thielman, School Committee Representative, Chair Kathleen Bodie, Superintendent, Co-vice chair Adam Chapdelaine, Town Manager, Co-vice chair Kirsi Allison-Ampe, School Committee Representative Francis Callahan, Community Member Representative John Cole, Chair, Permanent Town Building Committee Tobey Jackson, Community Member Representative Matthew Janger, AHS Principal Ryan Katofsky, Community Member Representative Kate Loosian, Community Member Representative William McCarthy, AHS Assistant Principal Steve Nesterak, Facilities Director (absent) Judson Pierce, Community Member (absent) Sandy Pooler, Deputy Town Manager Brian Rehrig, Capital Planning Committee Member (absent) Daniel Ruiz, Community Member Representative Amy Speare, Community Member Representative Shannon Knuth, Teacher Representative (absent) Kent Werst, Teacher Representative Also present: Jim Burrows, Victoria Clifford, Skanska Inc. Lori Cowles, Arthur Duffy, Melissa Greene, HMFH Architects, Inc. Call to order: 6:00 pm Public Participation – None

Exterior Design Review

HMFH explains that they are perusing Option A with a more traditional feel to it. HMFH also pointed out that 13 out of 16 requested that the auditorium is expressed. They have followed

this direction. HMFH also pointed out that they are owning certain amount of cost related to studying the façade HMFH’s presentation tonight is paired down due to the fact that the design team has done a lot of leg

work over the past few weeks getting the designs to the estimators On the concept drawings, the angled auditorium is outlined in red and the straightened-out auditorium is

in yellow. HMFH explained that the angled, red version, saves some green space in the front and makes the length of the front façade seem shorter due to the illusion of depth. The straight across version, in yellow, was explored in an attempt to appeal to a more “traditional” design.

Draft Concept 1 o Most similar to existing colonnade in the existing façade o Columns are attached to the building. o The D-Lab is no longer at the front – HMFH is not sure in this version where where it will go


Page 2 of 7

o Auditorium wing is straightened out (yellow perimeter version) o Showing a sun shade sticking out over the window – HMFH will do sun studies in the Design

Development phase to evaluate cost and performance Draft Concept 1A

o Building on Concept 1, while including the cupula and clock at the same scale o Could the D-Lab fit in the cupola? HMFH thinks yes, but it may change the shape of the room. It

may not be the most desired proportions. o Q: Could HMFH Scale down the copula and clock tower?

We could, but it wouldn’t be a historical reuse o Q: Kathy asks; Have you considered going back to a previous design?

A: Lori – no because we don’t have time, and this is the direction that was been decided to date

Draft Concept Plan 2 o Modern interpretation of the columns o D-Lab would be expressed at the top o Level of transparency to see what is going on – bringing light to the central spine o Q: What are HMFH’s thoughts on the material used to make the columns?

TBD Could be wood could be panelized Showing them as white to keep the traditional white trim aesthetic – could be changed

o Q: Could the D-Lab be simplified? A: Yes.

Draft Concept Plan 3 o Thought was to bring the columns upwards o Showing no windows in the auditorium o Bringing in more of the color white to the building design o Depth of the top portion is flush with the bottom canopy o HMFH is working on scaling down the top portion o Q: Kathy asks: Are sun shades beneficial for LEED point? Is it better to have actual shades?

A: Lori: The sun shades goal is to use the sun, not block it out. The shades will manage the impact of the light, not block it out. With it comes the responsibility to manage the shades to maximize light and energy shading – we will provide diagrams for.

A: Dan Ruiz: It’s part of the net-0 of the building, it doesn’t give points – it will help take the burden off the occupants to manage the shades for energy management

o Matt: The advantage of the D-Lab where it is, is that it’s closer to the performing arts and the shared spaces. It was seen as a specialized space for the humanities, but now it’s closer to the STEAM wing. The D-Lab needs to be located and accessed easily to the Central Spine.

o Lori: The D-Lab cannot go in the back of the spine, because the library needs space. o Kate: not sure that the DL-ab needs so much attention in the façade design. Kathy- Agrees with

Kate. It would have been nicer near the humanities wing and also, it’s currently shown with a lot of glass.

o John Cole: Does not accept that the D-Lab can’t be moved as it is the architect’s job to appease the client. Jon states that is the administration wants the D-Lab to be moved, then they need to make a formal request for it to be moved.

Draft Concept 4:


Page 3 of 7

o Curved front entrance Draft Concept 5:

o Minimizes the columns to just the canopy o Windows in façade will show the central spine not the D-Lab

Draft Concept 6: o Introducing wood at a material used in the front façade o Has the least windows o Arthur mentioned that the D-Lab is a way to show expression that is not a decoration o Matt says that he is ok with the D-Lab location as long as it is near the spine

Q: Sandy: What is the advantage of the auditorium having windows? o A: Lori: when the space is being used for practice, the windows will bring in light to fill the

space – it makes it more functional throughout the day. Sandy – There seems to be a sense of proportions to colonnades. I think some of the columns here are

not proportionate to classic design. Not sure that they look “right”. Q: Kate: What is the goal for tonight? John Cole follows up: based on conversations with fellow architects and leadership – we put together the

provided green sheet (“Mass Ave Façade and Entry Design Alternatives to Scheme A”). We could make some hard decisions that would give the architect specific directions on items to be selected. Here are the critical questions to answer tonight:

o Should the auditorium be pivoted or straight? o Should there be a cupola or representation of column house? o Should the D-Lab be on this façade prominently?

This could lead to the ultimate decision of eliminating a few concepts Q: Kent: On the steam wing, the back angle, could you switch the angle from the front and back of the

wing? o Q: It could happen in design development phase, but It would have impact to logistics of the

project phasing and design on the classroom courtyard Adam comments that shifting the façade to the straight (yellow) version would take away the green that

we’ve promised to the community – going off good faith we should attend to keep the as drawn (on the angle)

Ryan: Keeping the red line will add space to the geothermal wells, which we assume we will utilize the front green for.

Q: Does the yellow configuration make a positive impact to the size of the amphitheater? o A: Matt: The size the amphitheater currently is large enough. If it were bigger, we would have

trouble filling it. VOTE: Committee votes on position of the arts wing (red or yellow perimeter drawing):

o All vote for red. o Kathy votes for yellow.

Recommendation for the D-Lab:

o Kathy does not like it as a focal point of the design. Also, doesn’t like the idea that the façade of glass is primarily glass.

o Bill: would like it in the front or back, close to an exit. o John: Do we have direction on a location of the D-Lab?


Page 4 of 7

o Ryan: Struggling to make a decision on the D-Lab location without seeing the D-Lab in the back of the building.

o Dan: Sees the D-Lab as a perfect symbol for the school as a place to come together and across all disciplines and have meaningful conversations – is hearing from the administrators that the D-Lab location is fine where it is from an adjacency standpoint

o Frank: Thinks it’s important that whatever we put in the front facade is programmatic not decorative. Shouldn’t be a massive overrepresentation. Liked the older version of concept A at scale.

o Matt: The D-Lab is in a fine location, It’s important to be accessible from the spine corridor. It might work well in the back, but we haven’t seen it like that yet – Matt proposes we study showing the D-Lab in the back to compare.

Q: What would it take to see the D-Lab in the back? o A: Lori – would have to show it in the design development phase

Jim: The cupola and clock has a higher cost impact above and beyond the estimate. The other concepts are confidently going to be covered in the estimate.

Kathy expressed that she is disappointed to hear that the estimate won’t cover the cupola and clock Adam followed up: When we selected option A, we didn’t include a cupola and clock. Doesn’t have a

recollection that we would include the cupola and clock in the estimate Dan: would not like to ask HMFH to develop designs further are this time 2/12 due to the timeline of the

Schematic Design submission Frank concerned with moving the D-Lab to the back due to publicity of the floor plans thus far From a cost perspective, 1A would have the most cost impact and be the least attractive for the

sustainability features. 6 might also have a larger cost impact due to the tilt roof and wood treatment.

Jeff asks committee to rank their top two concepts. The top choice will be our final directions.

Kathy Bodie – 1A / 1 Michael Mason – 1 / 4 Adam Chapdelaine– 2 / 4 John Cole – 2 /4 (scheme 2 with a 2-story colonnade) Sandy Pooler– 6 / 1 (wish the D-Lab was on top of 1) Matt Janger– 1 Kent Werst– 1 / 2 (maybe with a combo of 2 and 4) Bill McCarthy– 2 / 1 Kate Loosian– 2 Ryan Katofsky– 2 / 5 Toby Jackson– 2 / 1 Dan Ruiz– 3 / 2 (request for less windows on the close theater façade) Amy Speare– 2 Frank Callahan – 2 / 4 Kirsi Allison-Ampe – 2 / 6 Jeff Thielman – 4 / 2 Concept 2 has the majority

MOTION Adam Chapdelaine moves to direct the architect develop scheme 2 with direction from John Cole to extend the second story entrance. Seconded by Kate Loosian.

All those in favor to adopt the motions proposed by John Cole –


Page 5 of 7

Vote to approve the adoption of the motion:

- In Favor: 11 - Opposed (2) – Kathy Bodie, Matt Janger - Abstain (1) – William McCarthy

Finance Subcommittee Update

SBC Reviews the “Updated Parmenter Analysis – Cost Factors”

Q: Amy: Is there any possible way to get 9 classrooms are Parmenter o A: It is not possible

Kathy: We have no choice but to accommodate for the size of the preschool – If we moved the preschool to Parmenter, we would probably have to move classrooms to a different elementary school, which we have at Ottoson.

Sandy: Do we need to include an elevator? o We have included it because the program leaders asked for one – and this is a special education

program – also code could require one. o Sandy would like to look at the code requirements and the possibility of keeping an elevator

temporarily – also

Kirsi moves to reaffirm the vote of the AHSBC to keep the preschool permanently at the High School. Kirsi see’s it as important to keep it the Preschool at the High School because relocating to Parmenter would short change the community, also, the adjacency for the Early Childhood program is important for the high school students and if we build the space as part of this project, we could use it in the future to accommodate future enrollment growth. Motion is seconded by Kate.

Jeff asked the committee for a roll-call vote: All in favor say I, the I’s are unanimous.

Kathy adds that Parmenter needs work. There needs to be an investment in the building in the near future.

Q: Is there a possibility that the MSBA will reimburse the Preschool if it is built in the HS? Possibly. o It is possible, but the MSBA has not formally accepted it as reimbursable space. We will know

by the Project Scope and Budget meeting. - Jeff touches on the issue of the previously submitted Parmenter figures not including soft costs. Jeff asks

that Skanska reviews future proposal’s more carefully and every meeting with the understanding that figures can be voted on.

DWP Project Update Adam gives an update on the DWP Project Design

Adam explains that the project would like to develop their design with knowing the relationship between our two properties

Kathy asks if adding the connection to Grove will add traffic as a cut through will be a concern – it may be necessary to add a remote operated gate

Matt: thinks that the Grove Street access could have a gate during the majority of the day, and opened for drop off pick up hours


Page 6 of 7

Adam – if there is access at all through Grove Street, the salt shed design on the DWP site will need to be altered

Committee discusses possibility buying the property between the school and the DWP site – we would need to begin conversations with the owner – town would need to bring the decision to town meeting

Matt asks if we have discussed potential buying of properties on Schooler Court. Jeff answered that we have not.

The committee has favored the idea of the Grove Street Connection. Adam sees no need for a motion unless the DPW plans change.

Sustainability Subcommittee Update

- Ryan gives preliminary results from the energy model effort - The goal EUI baseline target: 38 with the hopes to get to 30 - The preliminary model gets us to 36, so we already meet our baseline target - Based on programing, the school programing is a third of the energy use, the rest is summer programing,

night and weekend programing. - We have a ballpark estimate of the required solar to run the school - it is a large number and we are

unlikely to meet it. - This work has been informing the cost estimating exercise - Q: When is the analysis of the life cycle assessment?

o A: That will be in the design development phase - Q: When will we know if we are going to reach net 0?

o A: Ryan thinks it is safe to say we won’t reach it due to the constraints on the site. Which doesn’t mean we shouldn’t aim to get as low as possible

- Arthur comments that the main goal of Design Development is to price out and explore areas to add PV - Q: Amy asks if the campaign request an estimate on the life cycle/cost comparison for the design we are

proposing o Ryan doesn’t see it as possible

- The estimate that we are getting for the SD will cost out the sustainable features - Request from John: Can we do a benchmark that shows our EUI compared to other EUI’s? Ryan says

yes. - Adam: We could probably set some goals on geothermal / PV’s to build a conceptual life cycle analysis.

Believes we should advertise the global impact we are making by getting the building to where we have it today.

Communications Subcommittee No forums planed at this time

- Jeff: suggests we do road-show presentations to different town committees: o Select board o Finance Committee o Town Meeting Committee

- Jeff also proposed that we invite town meeting members here (give two dates) - High School Comparison blog has been well received - Starting on Feb 12, we will be the featured table on the Robinson Library

New Business None


Page 7 of 7

Minutes for Approval None Motion by Adam to adjourn, seconded by Kate Loosian at 9:30 p.m.

Recorded By: Victoria Clifford, Skanska Submitted by: Karen Tassone Recording Secretary AHS Building Committee [email protected]



Agenda


2. Cost Estimate Review

3. Project Budget Review


5. New Business



Approved February 5, 2019

Page 1 of 3



Present: Jeff Thielman, School Committee Representative, Chair Kathleen Bodie, Superintendent, Co-vice chair Adam Chapdelaine, Town Manager, Co-vice chair Kirsi Allison-Ampe, School Committee Representative Francis Callahan, Community Member Representative John Cole, Chair, Permanent Town Building Committee Tobey Jackson, Community Member Representative Matthew Janger, AHS Principal Ryan Katofsky, Community Member Representative Kate Loosian, Community Member Representative Michael Mason APS Chief Financial Officer William McCarthy, AHS Assistant Principal (absent) Steve Nesterak, Facilities Director (absent) Judson Pierce, Community Member Sandy Pooler, Deputy Town Manager Brian Rehrig, Capital Planning Committee Member Daniel Ruiz, Community Member Representative Amy Speare, Community Member Representative Shannon Knuth, Teacher Representative Kent Werst, Teacher Representative Also present: Jim Burrows, Victoria Clifford, Dale Caldwell, Skanska Inc. Lori Cowles, Arthur Duffy, Stephanie MacNeil, HMFH Architects, Inc. Call to order: 6:00 pm Public Participation Michael DeLisi stated that he was looking forward to the discussion of cost, he was hoping that the $3008 million estimate would have come down before now. Laura Notman expressed concern about design, asking that it be a building for our current and future time. Cost Estimate Review Jim Burrows, Skanska project manager, reviewed the cost estimates and informed the committee that the summary project total was $299 million, that includes $243 million in construction costs, $11 million for Owner’s and Construction contingencies and $14 million for Design contingency. The next step will be to place the numbers into MSBA’s 3011 form with some tweaks. Project Budget Review

Lori Cowles HMFH, presented a list of items priced separately as per the committees’ request. Three items on the list are labeled as ‘out:

Under Site Amenities turf fields – cost above cost of grass $1,130,264 Under Net Zero/Mechanical – VRF (with partial geothermal) Savings over base design (3,738,730)


Page 2 of 3

Under Premium for Historic Reuse – refabricate new Collomb façade at large courtyard in phase 2 at a cost of $2,466,000.

The Committee had extensive discussion about Site Amenities 1.) Competition baseball field (flipped fields/new backstops/grading less softball disturbance due to geo-wells/reseeding/drainage-irrigation changes): $693,815 2.) OUT turf fields - baseball & softball (above cost of grass): $1,130,264 committee discussed keeping the turf, what the actual cost is, lifecycle and potential rental income. 3.) Amphitheater (AV/stage/granite tiers): $471,121 – savings could be found 4.) Minuteman Bikeway ramp access: $2,892,755 5.) ramp/stair at east side: $668,560 6.) Traffic light at Mill Street $479,500 Net-zero/mechanical system 7.) Geothermal wells (with partial VRF): $9,864,000 8.) Containerized bad soil due to drilling wells: $2,740,000 VS. 9.) OUT VRF (with partial geothermal) SAVINGS OVER BASE DESIGN: ($3,738,730) 10.) PV infrastructure/super-structure at RTUs/installation at roof: $1,265,880 11.) PV infrastructure/structure/installation at parking lot: $1,433,020 12.) PV infrastructure/structure/installation at north side bleacher location: $289,070 13.) Electrical vehicle charging at 10% of parking: $205,500 14.) Electrical vehicle ready infrastructure at remaining 90% of parking: $184,950 15.) Bike parking for 100 bikes (per LEED),each rack holds 2, therefore 50 racks, $82,200 PREMIUM for HISTORIC REUSE 16.) Restore/reuse of existing Collomb facade at large courtyard in Phase 2 $2,055,000 17.) OUT fabricate new Collomb facade at large courtyard in Phase 2: $2,466,000 18.) Fusco facade reuse/relocation: $473,472 19.) Salvage, repair, store and reinstall Fusco wood panel: $20,550 20.) Salvage, repair, store and reinstall Old Hall proscenium, $34,250 21.) Salvage, repair, store and reinstall Old Hall plaster friezes: $27,400 22.) Salvage, repair, store and reinstall River of Hands mosaic, $41,100 23.) Salvage and repair clock: $27,400 The Committee discussed at length the project cost and their responsibility to the voters at looking at VE items in order to reduce the project budget to somewhere between $285 - $295 million. The committee agreed that any reduction in total budget would not come from the educational program. On a motion by John Cole seconded by Kate Loosian it was: Voted to direct HMFH and Skanska to prepare a report of value engineering recommendations that would reduce the total project cost to $290 million without touching the educational program. Motion passes 11 yes 4 no 1 abstention (Kathy Bodie, Jeff Thielman, Michael Mason, and Judson Pierce with no votes) (Matt Janger Abstained). Discussed the placement of town/school departments, currently the Comptroller will move to Town Hall, the Facilities and IT department are scheduled to move the new the DPW facility. Payroll is still not resolved, Adam Chapdelaine stated that payroll could reside at Town Hall adjacent to the current human resource department. Supt. Bodie responded that option could not work with the school payroll department and stated that do to that would necessitate dividing the town and school payroll department.


Page 3 of 3

Dr. Bodie and the Town Manager will have further discussion on this item. Sandy Pooler pointed out the two hard numbers needed are the project total cost going to MSBA and the appropriation to be put before Town Meeting. By law, the debt exclusion part of the June 11 vote need not have a specific figure, but the campaign for voters should have such a number

Items that HMFH will report back on: Confirming if the bike area is covered. Benchmarking on data on geothermal wells. Reviewing the pricing of the bike ramp. Putting together some information on the ROI on the proposed geothermal plan. Send Adam and Kathy (also needed on Wednesday for School Committee discussion) the dimensions of

the fields, including information on the mound, and the lifecycle costs of the turf. Reviewing with your landscape architect the design and plans for the amphitheater. Reviewing the scope of the Power Purchase Agreement. Providing more detail about the building Value Engineering items, create a sheet that shows a column of

MSBA reimbursable caps. School Committee will review the VE list at their meeting on January 30 th and will respond to the building committee with any recommendations for the building committee meeting scheduled on January 31st. Approval of Minutes On a motion by Adam Chapdelaine seconded by Tobey Jackson it was: Voted to approve the meeting minutes of January 8 and 22, 2018. New Business Dan Ruiz has been in contact with the CM at Billerica Project and the building committee is invited to tour Billerica High School. A doodle will be sent to the committee to determine the best date. On a motion by Daniel Ruiz seconded by Ryan Katofsky it was unanimously: Voted to adjourn @ 9:00 pm. Submitted by: Karen Tassone Recording Secretary AHS Building Committee [email protected]



Agenda


2. Discussion of Potential Value Engineering Items

3. New Business



Page 1 of 3



Present: Jeff Thielman, School Committee Representative, Chair Kathleen Bodie, Superintendent, Co-vice chair Adam Chapdelaine, Town Manager, Co-vice chair Kirsi Allison-Ampe, School Committee Representative Francis Callahan, Community Member Representative John Cole, Chair, Permanent Town Building Committee Tobey Jackson, Community Member Representative Matthew Janger, AHS Principal (absent) Ryan Katofsky, Community Member Representative Kate Loosian, Community Member Representative Michael Mason APS Chief Financial Officer William McCarthy, AHS Assistant Principal Steve Nesterak, Facilities Director Judson Pierce, Community Member (absent) Sandy Pooler, Deputy Town Manager Brian Rehrig, Capital Planning Committee Member Daniel Ruiz, Community Member Representative Amy Speare, Community Member Representative Shannon Knuth, Teacher Representative Kent Werst, Teacher Representative Also present: Jim Burrows, Victoria Clifford, Dale Caldwell, Skanska Inc. Lori Cowles, Arthur Duffy, HMFH Architects, Inc. Call to order: 6:00 pm Public Participation Gordon Jamieson thanked the committee for its thoughtful work. He urged spending on ways to encourage

bicycles and called having turf fields a no-brainer and noted that the columns are not worth $2.5 million. Michael DeLisi suggested having a budget floor set at $270 million, and working from there to add items in. Laura Notman stated that the high school will be our flagship building and urged to use durable materials

that will last 100 years. Also consider incorporating turf at a later date and that historical items could be funded by the community or alumni.

Peter- requested that the Menotomy Preschool be taken out of the project and moved to the former Parmenter, because its location at AHS lacks trees and open space.

Chairman Jeff Thielman explained the proposed the plan for tonight’s meeting. HMFH/Skanska Presentation Lori Cowles reviewed the responses to questions raised at Tuesday’s meeting per the attached memo. Value Engineering Activity


Page 2 of 3

The Committee went through each VE item individually in the sheet marked "Potential VE Items” and was allowed five minutes of discussion on each. Committee members can vote to remove a VE item. After discussion the committee took a straw vote ( non-binding) on each item. Skanska tabulated the votes (visible on screen), the majority vote for any item will reflect on the spreadsheet

will tabulate the savings. A yes votes means the committee agreed to remove the item from the project:. Simplify amphitheater design ($274,884): Yes Simplify Minuteman bike ramp ($1 million): Yes Various site reductions ($70,000): Yes Three items related to photovoltaic infrastructure (costing $1,206,698, $1,113,748 and $55,977): The vote

was yes, but they were not removed from the project; instead, the costs will be covered under with Ameresco, a renewable-energy company)

Electrical-vehicle infrastructure 227 parking spaces ($49,950): Yes Create image of Collomb House on glass curtain wall in lieu of reusing existing ($1,965,000): Yes Salvage, repair, store and reinstall Old Hall proscenium ($34,255): Yes Salvage clock and turn over to town ($20,000): Yes Change sloped glazing to unit skylights ($154,000): No Reduce 30 percent of copper siding to brick veneer ($556,611): Yes Change ceilings of science and Family & Consumer Sciences Education classrooms ($544,321): Yes Reduce acoustical wall treatment by 10 percent ($72,891): Yes Change toilet facility from brick to CMU ($44,045): Yes Delete roof deck above performing-arts classroom, add PVC roofing ($178,456): Yes Delete wood paneling at School Committee Room ($119,984): Yes Reduce glass guardrail by 25 percent ($84,718): Yes Reduce AV/sound systems by 10 percent ($197,998): No Reduce exterior sunshades by 10 percent ($156,000): No Relocate payroll offices to Town Hall ($804,372): Split vote, to be decided Cost-estimate correction (erroneous interior space) ($275,958): Yes

Subtotal of the list above: $8,979,866 Suggested to add back: Turf fields for baseball and softball, which is higher than the cost of grass ($1,130,264): Yes Total potential value-engineering items ($7,849,602) Change brick at athletics wing to CMU ($252,381): No

There was a motion to table discussion (motion failed) of the payroll department location, currently payroll is in the estimates and in the floor plans (mezzanine level between preschool and district offices). Supt. Bodie and the Town Manager will continue to discuss the location and report out at the next meeting. School Committee Report Chair of the School Committee Kirsi Allison-Ampe reported that the school committee met and agreed that no educational program items be omitted from the project. The Committee, (per request of the AHS Building Committee) created a rank order if additional cuts must be made. Memo attached.

1. Move Payroll out of the High School 2. Reduce the size of Menotomy Preschool Classrooms 3. Reduce the size of the Chorus classroom 4. Reduce the size of the Black Box Theatre 5. Reduce the size of the LABBB program space


Page 3 of 3

Jim Burrow, Skanska reported that the new project cost is $ 290,735,899.00. If payroll is kept in the costs the total amount is $291,701,135. Next Meeting The Committee can discuss anything on the "Items for Separate Pricing" list (page 1 of the HMFH report) should the committee wish to make other reductions. The Committee will discuss any other information it needs in order to be ready to take a final vote on February 5th. The Committee would like to see at the next meeting:

Show slides of the back of the building Show the sketches and location of the proposed payroll department. A breakout of soft costs.

New Business Daniel Ruiz informed that he will be sending out a doodle with dates for the committee to tour Billerica High School. The CM is willing to meet on a Saturday and to also have 2 different tour days to accommodate everyone. Bill McCarthy is continuing his work on creating a catalogue of items for the memorial subcommittee. On a motion by Kate Loosian seconded by Daniel Ruiz it was unanimously: Voted to adjourn @ 9:30 pm. Submitted by: Karen Tassone Recording Secretary AHS Building Committee [email protected]

JTC1k1 SC:::)LS Arlington, Massachusetts 02476-0002

P.O. Box 167 • 869 Massachusetts Avenue • (781) 316-3540

Office Of The School Committee

January 7, 2019

Jeff Thielman

Arlington High School Building Committee Chair

869 Massachusetts Avenue

Arlington, MA 02476

Dear Mr. Thielman and Members of the Board,

The Arlington School Committee is committed to a fiscally responsible, educationally sound

high school building project. To that end, we want to make the following statements to the

High School Building Committee, as they evaluate the costs of key aspects of the building.

Please note this memo is written with the assumption that the total project estimate (including

items already omitted) is below the initial estimate cited in the Preferred Schematic Report

(PSR).

First, as School Committee we wish to reaffirm that the Educational Program presented to the

Massachusetts School Building Authority (MSBA) and the architects is thoughtful and sound.

A tremendous amount of work went into creating the Educational Program, including many

hours of thought, strategy, planning, and discussion, with participation from administrators,

teachers, students and community members. Education has changed significantly in the past

100 years, even in the past ten years. The Educational Program as conceived addresses these

changes and creates a building that enables the components that make up 215' century

learning.

Second, we urge the Building Committee to avoid making reductions to items that would be

difficult to reverse in the future. For example, the current auditorium seats 900 people, and it is

filled to capacity for many events during the school year. A reduction in the size and seating of

the auditorium will have an immediate and detrimental impact on the school community, and

expanding the auditorium in the future would be extraordinarily difficult and expensive.

Likewise, maintaining sizes and outfitting of gym spaces as proposed in the Educational

Program is very important. Reductions in the main gym size will decrease its functionality. If

reduced significantly, the ability to hold two classes simultaneously will be lost, a concern given

rising enrollment numbers. The school will also have no spaces large enough to hold all-school

assemblies.

An Equal Opportunity School System with a High Commitment to Diversity

Simply put, "getting it right the first time" may come with a higher initial price tag, but is less

costly to future taxpayers who would need to pay to correct any mistakes we make today.

Third, the school committee views the inclusion of the Menotomy Preschool as having

programmatic value. The preschool serves an essential role for our youngest students with

special needs, and also enables high school students to have hands-on experience in Early

Childhood Development and work toward 'Office for Early Education and Care' certification.

We suggest a careful cost-benefit analysis of any changes regarding either the Preschool or the

District Administrative offices. The difference in costs between maintaining non-high school

functions on site with the comparative expense of obtaining, renovating, and maintaining these

functions elsewhere needs to be thoroughly documented.

Finally, it is important that decisions take into consideration enrollment growth. The high

school design enrollment is 1755. With current projections it is expected that the high school

will achieve this enrollment in 2025 or 2026, and that enrollment will continue to increase

beyond this. Although we understand that the new school will be able to comfortably house

significantly more than its design enrollment, given the growth of the district over the past 5

years we feel it is prudent to make any decisions with additional enrollment growth in mind.

In conclusion, we want to reiterate that this letter is written with the assumption that the new

total project estimate (including items already omitted) is below the initial estimate cited in the

PSR. In the weeks to come the School Committee will be consulting with the Superintendent

and the high school principal to discuss situations requiring potential reductions in educational

spaces in the new facility and will communicate any future recommendations at a later date.

We are grateful for the thoughtful work done by the Building Committee, and remain

committed to engaging in thoughtful dialogue and supporting the efforts to build a new facility

that meets the needs of our community going into the future.

On behalf of the Arlington School Committee,

Kirsi Allison-Ampe, MD.

Arlington School Committee, Chair


Meeting Date: Tuesday, February 5, 2019 – 6:00 pm Location: AHS-School Committee Room-Sixth Floor

Agenda


2. Design Update

3. MSBA 3011 – Soft Costs

4. Cost Estimate Discussion

5. New Business


Page 1 of 4

Arlington High School Building Committee Meeting Tuesday, February 5, 2019


Present: Jeff Thielman, School Committee Representative, Chair Kathleen Bodie, Superintendent, Co-vice chair Adam Chapdelaine, Town Manager, Co-vice chair Kirsi Allison-Ampe, School Committee Representative (@6:30) Francis Callahan, Community Member Representative John Cole, Chair, Permanent Town Building Committee Tobey Jackson, Community Member Representative Matthew Janger, AHS Principal Ryan Katofsky, Community Member Representative Kate Loosian, Community Member Representative Michael Mason APS Chief Financial Officer William McCarthy, AHS Assistant Principal Steve Nesterak, Facilities Director Judson Pierce, Community Member Sandy Pooler, Deputy Town Manager Brian Rehrig, Capital Planning Committee Member Daniel Ruiz, Community Member Representative Amy Speare, Community Member Representative Shannon Knuth, Teacher Representative Kent Werst, Teacher Representative Also present: Jim Burrows, Victoria Clifford, Skanska Inc. Lori Cowles, Arthur Duffy, Melissa Greene, HMFH Architects, Inc. Call to order: 6:00 pm Public Participation ♦ Michael DeLisi spoke to the cost to keep the payroll department at the school site as well as noting that

there is not set standard for electrical packages. ♦ Al Tosti thanked the committee for their work, was hoping to get to $275 million, looking forward to

meeting with the Capital Planning and Finance committees in March. Urged the committee to think about the opposition vote when voting and to balance the cost benefit analysis, he likes a $289.9 price

♦ Rob Spiegel, Director of Human Resources for Arlington Public Schools, spoke in support of maintaining the payroll department with the district offices. Mr. Spiegel explained that payroll and human resource departments interface every day, multiple times especially during the summer months due to overlapping functions. He also noted that payroll calculations are different between town and school (per diem for school employees), he has surveyed colleagues and most all have the same configuration as is current in Arlington

Mr. Thielman reviewed the process for tonight’s meeting. Mr. Callahan requested a 20 minutes recess to review materials received late this afternoon.

Page 2 of 4

Design Update Melissa Greene, HMFH, described the latest version of the exterior design for AHS and displayed a "working model" on a screen that showed building materials, canopies and vestibules. MSBA 3011 – Soft Costs Jim Burrows of Skanska reviewed soft costs and revised the estimates per his handout that shows: Arlington High School Building Committee Presentation Budget Updates (DRAFT)

*20% Cap on Soft Costs

The above does not include payroll costs. Jim also reviewed the MSBA Guidelines for Reimbursement that covers Site Costs that are:

♦ Eligible Site Costs ♦ Categorially Ineligible Site Costs ♦ Potentially Ineligible Site Costs.

Lori Cowles, HMFH, reported to the committee that: ♦ The review of the proposed artificial turf layout which accommodates softball field overlay and baseball

with a practice field overlay, neither overlay overlap with the pitchers area/mound. The entire field will be turf, it works, it is safe and for baseball a portable pitching mound may be used. The fields can be used for sub varsity games, not varsity by 5 feet, HMFH will check to see if they can be expanded by that amount.

♦ Lighting is not in the project budget, it would cost $1,300,000. The Committee was in favor of lights sighting the growing need to have usable space/fields in town.

Page 3 of 4

: Cost Estimate Discussion Supt. Bodie informed the Committee that she is willing to let go of the current proposal to place the payroll department in the mezzanine area , however, payroll will remain in district offices. The current district floor plans will be redone to include the payroll office, storage is okay to move off site. VE Discussion Reviewing the VE list there is no action to be taken on page one, On page two

♦ On a motion by Sandy Pooler seconded by Daniel Ruiz it was unanimously: Voted to reaffirm all votes taken on the VE items at the January 31st meeting separating any that warrant a separate vote.

♦ On a motion by Sandy Pooler seconded by Daniel Ruiz it was: Voted to approve item A simplify amphitheater design. 17 in favor 1 opposed Jud Pierce

♦ On a motion by Sandy Pooler seconded by Daniel Ruiz it was unanimously: Voted to approve item B simplify the Minuteman bike ramp.

♦ On a motion by Sandy Pooler seconded by Brian Rehrig and amended by Kirsi Allison-Ampe it was unanimously voted :item H Remove the funding for the restoration and reuse of the Collomb House facade and add $200,000 for an artistic commemoration of Collomb House or other historical reuse and arts installation.

♦ On a motion by Sandy Pooler seconded by Brian Rehrig on item I ‘Salvage, repair, store and reinstall Old Hall proscenium, motion fails 12 no votes, 6 yes votes

♦ On a motion by Ryan Katofsky seconded by Kate Loosian it was Voted to Reduce 30% of copper siding to brick veneer (item L) 16 yes, 1 no (J. Pierce) 1 abstention (Steve Nesterak)

♦ On a motion by Kirsi Allison-Ampe seconded by Brian Rehrig it was unanimously: Voted the reduction of square feet and retaining the payroll department at the high school (item Y).

♦ On a motion by Brian Rehrig seconded by Adam Chapdelaine it was: Voted to accept item X the addition of the athletic field lights. 13 yes, 4 no 1 abstention. On a motion by Brian Rehrig seconded by Kirsi Allison-Ampe it was

Voted to authorize SKANSKA USA BUILDING, INC. to submit the Schematic Design Submittal Notification to the Massachusetts School Building Authority with a total approximate project cost of $291,000,000.00 on behalf of the Arlington Building Committee on or before February 6, 2019. Unanimous vote.

Roll Call: Jeff Thielman - yes Kathleen Bodie - yes Adam Chapdelaine - yes Kirsi Allison-Ampe – yes Francis Callahan - yes John Cole, Chair – yes Tobey Jackson – yes Matthew Janger – yes Ryan Katofsky – yes Kate Loosian – yes Michael Mason - yes William McCarthy – yes

Page 4 of 4

Steve Nesterak – yes Judson Pierce – yes Sandy Pooler – yes Brian Rehrig – yes Daniel Ruiz – yes Amy Speare – yes Approval of Minutes

On a motion by Adam Chapdelaine and seconded by Kate Loosian it was unanimously: Voted to approve the meeting minutes of January 29 & 31, 2019

New Business

Next agenda will have the formal estimate and the full Schematic Design package to be voted by the committee for submission to MSBA and communication needs for the committee moving forward (i.e. receiving materials 24 hours before the meeting and transparency.

On a motion by Kate Loosian seconded by Matthew Janger it was unanimously: Voted to adjourn @ 10:00 pm. Submitted by: Karen Tassone Recording Secretary AHS Building Committee [email protected]



Thursday February 7, 2019 Town Manager’s Conference Room

4:00 p.m.

Agenda

♦ Review MSBA 3011

♦ Approval of Minutes


Monday February 11, 2019 Superintendent’s Office

8:30 a.m.

♦ Community Outreach Efforts (Robbins Library table, PTOs, Senior Center)

♦ - Future Blog and Website Content Discussion

♦ - April event for Town Meeting

♦ - Old Business

♦ - New Business


Meeting Date: Tuesday, February 19, 2019 – 6:00 pm Location: AHS-School Committee Room-Sixth Floor

Agenda


2. Votes Submission of MSBA Schematic Design

3. Proprietary Items review and approvals

4. Meeting process

5. Meetings with Town Committees – Open Space, Finance,

Capital Planning, other

6. New Business
