AMLAP 2020 September 5, 2020 Syntactic representations encode grammatical functions: evidence from structural priming in Cantonese Yoons ang Song 1 & Ry an K. Y. L ai 2 1 University of Hong Kong 2 UC Santa Barbar a
AMLAP 2020 September 5, 2020
Syntactic representations encode grammatical functions: evidence from structural priming in Cantonese
Yoonsang Song1 & Ryan K. Y. Lai2 1University of Hong Kong
2UC Santa Barbara
Introduction: Issue
• Do the mapping between grammatical functions and thematic roles persists across utterances? • GRAMMATICAL FUNCTIONS: structural (or syntactic) relationships among a sentence’s part
• e.g., subject, direct object, indirect object, oblique
• THEMATIC ROLES: semantic relationships among among a sentence’s part
• e.g., agent, patient (theme), goal, source, location, etc.
Introduction: Background
• Each syntactic construction can be defined by its unique mapping between grammatical functions and thematic roles.
• Priming of any syntactic construction involves the potential priming of mapping between grammatical functions and thematic roles.
Jason punched Mike.
Agent Patient
Subject Direct Object
Mike was punched by Jason.
Patient Agent
Subject Oblique
Active Construction Passive Construction
Introduction: Background cont’d
• The role of such mapping in structural priming is, however, still questionable, given other important sources of structural priming.
• Sentences in the same syntactic construction share: • Phrasal constituent structure (e.g., [S NP [VP V NP]]
• Information structure (e.g., emphasis on patient)
• Thematic role order (e.g., agent–theme–recipient)
Present Study: Research Question
• Do topic object-subject-verb active (Topic-OSV) sentences prime standard active sentences or passive sentences in Cantonese? • In Cantonese, standard active sentences are in subject-verb-object (SVO) order.
• Topic-OSV sentences are derived by fronting the direct object of standard active sentences and attaching the topic marker ne to it.
Go lengmougowaagaa waak-gandraw-PROGCL artist CL young.model
‘The artist is drawing the young model.’
Go lengmou go waagaa waak-gandraw-PROGCL artistCLyoung.model
‘The young model, the artist is drawing.’
Standard Active (SVO) Topic-OSV Active
Standard Passive
Go lengmou go waagaa waak-gandraw-PROGCL artistCLyoung.model
‘The young model is being drawn by the artist.’
beiby
neTOP
Present Study: Possible Outcomes
• If mapping between grammatical function and thematic roles is a major sources of structural priming, the Topic-OSV sentences should be able to prime the standard active construction.
• Otherwise, the Topic-OSV sentences should prime standard passive sentences via shared information structure and/or the linear order of thematic roles.
Syntactic Construction
Grammatical Function–Thematic Role Mapping
Constituent Structure
Information Structure
Thematic Role Order
Prime Topic-OSV subject–agent direct object–patient
[NP [NP [VP V ]]] patient topic patient–agent
Topic-Passive subject–patient direct object–agent
[NP [VP PP V] patient-topic patient–agent
Target standard active subject–agent direct object–patient
[NP [VP V NP] agent-topic agent–patient
standard passive subject–patient direct object–agent
[NP [VP PP V] patient-topic patient–agent
Method
• Participants: 30 native speakers of Cantonese (17 female; mean age = 23, SD = 3)
• Materials & Design • 24 experimental sets and 48 filler sets
• Three priming conditions:
• Topic-OSV
• Topic-Passive
• Baseline (a noun phrase)
• Two expected target structures:
• Standard active
• Standard passive
Results
Percentage of active, passive, and other responses in each prime condition
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Baseline Topic-OSV Topic-Passive
60%48%58%
38%49%38%
ActiveOtherPassive
Prime Condition
Target Construction
9
Significant priming from Topic-OSV to
standard active
Discussion
• Significant priming from Topic-OSV sentences to standard active sentences:
• This priming effect cannot be attributed to the constituent structure, information structure, or linear thematic role order of the prime sentences.
• Priming of grammatical function–thematic role mapping can be strong enough to override priming of information structure and thematic role order.
• Our finding support to language processing models incorporating grammatical functions in an explicit way (e.g., Bock and Levelt, 1994; Cai et al., 2012)
• Our data are more easily explained by syntactic theories that incorporate grammatical functions in a direct way, such as Lexical-Functional grammar (Kaplan & Bresnan, 1995).