Top Banner
Norway's knowledge platform on Short-lived climate forcers (SLCF) – holistic thinking and multiple benefits for climate change and air quality Vigdis Vestreng, Maria Malene Kvalevåg, Sigmund Guttu and Solrun Figenschau Skjellum, Norwegian Environment Agency Our Common Future Under Climate Change. International Scientific Conference 7-10 July 2015, Paris, France
22

Vestreng v 20150709_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_room_307

Jan 26, 2017

Download

Science

Ingrid LE RU
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Vestreng v 20150709_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_room_307

Norway's knowledge platform on Short-lived climate forcers (SLCF) – holistic thinking and multiple benefits for climate change and air quality

Vigdis Vestreng, Maria Malene Kvalevåg, Sigmund Guttu and Solrun Figenschau Skjellum, Norwegian Environment Agency

Our Common Future Under Climate Change. International Scientific Conference 7-10 July 2015, Paris, France

Page 2: Vestreng v 20150709_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_room_307

Why do we care about SLCF?

Page 3: Vestreng v 20150709_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_room_307

Short-lived climate forcers:

Black carbon, methane and tropospheric ozone, some HFCs, organic carbon and sulphur.

Relatively short lifetime in the atmosphere - a few days to a decade.

Location matters.

Warming or cooling influence on climate.

Also dangerous air pollutants, with various detrimental impacts on human health, agriculture and ecosystems.

Photo: Vigdis Vestreng

Page 4: Vestreng v 20150709_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_room_307

Rapid reductions are smart and possible

Co-benefits (Climate, air pollution, food production).

Mitigation of SLCFs limit the rate of warming.

Complimentary to CO2 .

Health and food security are strong policy drivers.

Contribute to several of the proposed UN Sustainable

Development Goals.

Mitigation options are available.

Page 5: Vestreng v 20150709_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_room_307

Norway’s SLCF knowledge platform

Page 6: Vestreng v 20150709_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_room_307

Five elements of our knowledge platform

1. Emission inventories and

projections.

2. Short-term net climate

effect.

3. Holistic analysis of

measures.

4. Economic analysis.

5. Reduction strategies.

Photo: iStock

Page 7: Vestreng v 20150709_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_room_307

Challenges for SLCF policy development

Norway’s SLCF action plan was the first of its kind.

Scientific understanding evolved rapidly – complicated policy development.

No universal methodological approach.

No internationally agreed metric.

Lack of international definitions and reporting guidelines for black carbon and organic carbon.

Photo: iStock

Page 8: Vestreng v 20150709_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_room_307

SLCFs CO2

Heating

Cooling

Important to reduce both short-lived climate forcers and CO2 in the

short term

Page 9: Vestreng v 20150709_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_room_307

The cost of measures decrease when health benefits are included

600 NOK

=100 USD/tonne

CO2eq(GTP10, Norway)

Page 10: Vestreng v 20150709_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_room_307

Reduction strategies

Page 11: Vestreng v 20150709_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_room_307

Some selection criteria:

Measure Cost-

efficiency

Climate effect Health

effect

Effectiveness of

instrument

1 High Low Høy Medium

2 Low Medium Low High

3 Medium Medium Medium High

Cost efficiency, climate and health effects are internally rated

Effectiveness of instrument is qualitatively

High

Page 12: Vestreng v 20150709_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_room_307

Photo: iStock

Key messages

Two-in-one solution: Climate and air

pollution.

Holistic approach is necessary to reach

the right conclusions and convey the right

message.

There is a need for internationally agreed

definitions and methodology.

Science still evolving, but strong case for

action.

Page 13: Vestreng v 20150709_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_room_307

Norway’s way forward

Calculate the short-term

climate effect of “CO2-

measures”.

Further develop the SLCFs

knowledge platform.

Contribute in international

cooperation (e.g. CCAC,

LRTAP, AC). Photo: Hilde Knapstad

Page 14: Vestreng v 20150709_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_room_307

www.miljødirektoratet.no

[email protected]

Page 15: Vestreng v 20150709_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_room_307

Source: Myhre et al., Nature Geoscience (2015)

CO2 is the

most

important

forcer

Page 16: Vestreng v 20150709_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_room_307
Page 17: Vestreng v 20150709_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_room_307

An emission metric for the short term climate effect must consider:

The purpose of the assessment.

The methodology (GWP or GTP).

The time period (e.g. 10, 20 or

100 years).

The region - where the emissions

occur (e.g. globally or in Norway).

“GTP10,Norway” was developed

for the Norwegian knowledge

platform.

Photo: iStock

Page 18: Vestreng v 20150709_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_room_307

The challenge ahead of us

Page 19: Vestreng v 20150709_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_room_307

IPCC AR5 Synthesis Report

Projected climate changes

Continued emissions of greenhouse gases will cause further

warming and changes in the climate system

Global glacier volume will further decrease

Global mean sea level will continue to rise during the 21st century

It is very likely that the Arctic sea ice cover will continue to shrink and thin as global mean surface temperature rises

Oceans will continue to warm during the 21st century

AR5 WGI SPM

Page 20: Vestreng v 20150709_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_room_307

IPCC AR5 Synthesis Report

A few potential impacts of Climate Change

Food and water shortages

Increased poverty

Increased displacement of people

Coastal flooding

AR5 WGII SPM

Page 21: Vestreng v 20150709_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_room_307

-1000

0

1000

Low Moderate

-2000

-3000

-4000

-5000 1

4

6 8 1

1 9 10

12 13

2

3

5

7

1

4

Reduction strategy 1:

Cost effectiveness

Emission reduction effectiveness

Health effect Climate

effect

High

Cost

eff

ecti

veness

NO

K/to

n

Page 22: Vestreng v 20150709_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_room_307

Reduction strategy 3:

Cost effectiveness

+ emission reduction effectiveness

+ climate effect (> 200 kt CO2eGTP10,Norway)/year)

-1000

0

1000

Low Moderate

-2000

-3000

-4000

-5000

1

1 9

2

7

1

4

Emission reduction effectiveness

Health effect Climate

effect

High

Cost

eff

ecti

veness

NO

K/to

n

Accelerated introduction

of new stoves and pellet

burners

Fitting DPFs to

existing light vehicles

Fitting DPFs to

existing

construction

machines

Monitoring leak control

and containment of HFCs

DPFs on

coastal

vessels