Understanding private blockchains

Understanding private blockchains

Dr Gideon Greenspan, Founder and CEO

A brief history of blockchains

2009 Bitcoin

2011—2013 Altcoins

2015— Many private blockchains

http

://c

orpo

rate

.com

cast

.com

/com

cast

-voi

ces/

com

cast

-spo

nsor

s-in

tern

et-m

easu

rem

ent-

hack

atho

n

Public blockchains in enterprises?

•  Low capacity •  Poor governance •  Unknown costs •  Anonymous miners •  Cryptocurrencies •  Writable by all •  Visible to all •  One bloated ledger

Blockchains for enterprises

•  Private shared database •  Byzantine fault tolerance •  Control of capacity + cost •  Designated “miners” •  No cryptocurrency •  Collective admin •  Blockchain as

tool not ideology

Tomato 1

This is just a shared

database!

Centralized shared databases

Client Server

Client

Request

Peer-to-peer shared databases

Node

Node

Node

Node Transaction

Block

Peer-to-peer shared databases

Node

Node

Node

Node Transaction

Block

Blockchain

Consensus created by validator nodes

Peer-to-peer DB requirements

•  Atomic transactions – Self-contained “packets”

•  Peer-to-peer ⇒ origin unknown – Transactions digitally signed – All data tagged by public key/s

•  Shared write ⇒ transaction constraints – Bitcoin vs Ethereum style

•  Consensus mechanism

Signed by Bob

Signed by Alice

Alice £10

Bob $15

Alice $15

Bob £10

Bitcoin-style constraints

Metadata: b469dc12a0746…

Ethereum-style constraints

from = msg.sender fromvalue = contract.storage[from]

to = msg.data[0] value = msg.data[1]

if fromvalue >= value: contract.storage[from] -= value contract.storage[to] += value return(1) else: return(0)

A new type of shared database

Tomato 2

This is not immutable!

“Mining” in private chains

•  All blocks signed by miner •  Only permitted miners

ü  No impersonation attacks

•  Mining diversity constraint ü  Proof of work not required

On immutability

•  Public blockchains – Secured by hashing power – Mutable by 51% of hashrate – Threat: someone rich (e.g. a government)

•  Private blockchains – Secured by distributed consensus – Mutable by ≥51% of validators – Threat: validator collusion

Tomato 3

This is not a blockchain!

Public vs private blockchains

Different Same

Permissions model Peer-to-peer architecture

Transaction censorship Byzantine fault tolerance

Native cryptocurrency Public key cryptography

“The blockchain” Transaction constraints

Proof-of-work consensus Consensus chain of blocks

Public vs private blockchains

Different Same

Permissions model Peer-to-peer architecture

Transaction censorship Byzantine fault tolerance

Native cryptocurrency Public key cryptography

“The blockchain” Transaction constraints

Proof-of-work consensus Consensus chain of blocks

Philosophical Investigations

“the meaning of a word is its use in the language”

— LW

Tomato 4

This has no uses!

What are blockchains for?

•  Old problem: – Shared database (or ledger) – Multiple writers – Limited trust

•  Old solution: – Centralized database at intermediary

•  New possibility: – Use a (private) blockchain

Blockchains vs centralized DBs

Advantages Disadvantages

Disintermediation Confidentiality

Robustness Performance

Post-trade settlement?

•  Interbank blockchain •  Issue any asset on chain •  Rapid settlement •  Delivery versus payment •  No need for reconciliation •  Regulatory transparency

Post-trade settlement?

•  Interbank blockchain •  Issue any asset on chain •  Rapid settlement •  Delivery versus payment •  No need for reconciliation •  Regulatory transparency

Confidentiality

Strong blockchain use cases

•  Lightweight financial systems •  Provenance tracking •  Interorganizational record keeping – Multiparty data aggregation

Lightweight finance

•  Any asset can be tokenized on blockchain – Tokens issued by trusted entity/s – Token confers right of redemption

•  Disintermediates centralized control – More secure and cheaper

•  Confidentiality limits applications – Small financial trading circles – Gift cards, loyalty points

Provenance tracking

•  Digital certificate of authenticity – Physical transfer ⇒ token transfer – Verifiable chain of custody

•  Disintermediates risk of fraud – Collusion cannot corrupt

•  Confidentiality via multiple addresses – Fewer transactions between competitors – Regulation can still be a concern

Asset movement patterns

Interorganizational records

•  Collectively record and notarize – Communications or transactions – Digital signatures + immutability

•  Infrastructure solution for large groups •  Disintermediates external party – Cheaper and simpler

•  Confidentiality easily addressed – Encryption or hashing

Tomato 5

This is nothing new!

Blockchain Old-Timers

New? Bitcoin transaction model

http

://q

iita.

com

/yan

agis

awa-

kent

aro/

item

s/50

3dfc

e376

2e3b

1237

c9

New? Compact state proofs

http

s://

blog

.eth

ereu

m.o

rg/2

015/

11/1

5/m

erkl

ing-

in-e

ther

eum

/

New: Awareness + Productization

Tomato 6

This is overhyped!

•  x

http://ericsammons.com/what-is-the-blockchain/

https://ripple.com/insights/2016-will-be-the-year-you-realized-you-dont-need-the-blockchain/

•  x

http://ericsammons.com/what-is-the-blockchain/

https://ripple.com/insights/2016-will-be-the-year-you-realized-you-dont-need-the-blockchain/

Tomato 7

This is all vaporware!

MultiChain blockchain platform

•  Off-the-shelf private blockchains ü  Easy to configure and deploy

•  Permission management ü  Private and tightly controlled

•  Native asset support ü  Tracked at network level

•  Extendable via metadata ü  Up to 8MB arbitrary data per transaction

MultiChain.com search acquisition

Jul 2015

Aug 2015

Sep 2015

Oct 2015

Nov 2015

Dec 2015

Jan 2016

Feb 2016

Mar 2016

Apr 2016

May 2016

Questions?

Visit www.multichain.com for:

MultiChain download Getting started guide

Developer docs and forum Popular private blockchain blog