Page 1 of 29 TABLE OF CONTENT Number Description Page 1.0 Objective of the experiment 2 2.0 Learning Outcome 2 3.0 Theory 2 4.0 Application of Truss 6 5.0 Procedures 10 6.0 Result and Analysis 11 7.0 Discussion 19 8.0 Conclusion 20 9.0 Appendix 21 (Group 7) (DEPARTMENT OF STRUCTURE AND MATERIAL ENGINEERING)
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1 of 24
TABLE OF CONTENT
Number Description Page
1.0 Objective of the experiment 2
2.0 Learning Outcome 2
3.0 Theory 2
4.0 Application of Truss 6
5.0 Procedures 10
6.0 Result and Analysis 11
7.0 Discussion 19
8.0 Conclusion 20
9.0 Appendix 21
1.0 OBJECTIVE (Group 7)
(DEPARTMENT OF STRUCTURE AND MATERIAL ENGINEERING)
Page 2 of 24
1.1 The effect of redundant member in a structure is observed
and the method of analyzing type of this structure is
understood.
2.0 LEARNING OUTCOME
2.1 Application of engineering knowledge in practical
application.
2.2 To enhance technical competency in structure engineering
through laboratory application.
3.0 THEORY
A truss that is assumed to comprise members that are
connected by means of pin joints, and which is supported at both
ends by means of hinged joints or rollers, is described as being
statically determinate. Newton's Laws apply to the structure as a
whole, as well as to each node or joint. In order for any node that
may be subject to an external load or force to remain static in
space, the following conditions must hold: the sums of all
horizontal forces, all vertical forces, as well as all moments
acting about the node equal zero. Analysis of these conditions at
each node yields the magnitude of the forces in each member of
the truss. These may be compression or tension forces.
Trusses that are supported at more than two positions are
said to be statically indeterminate, and the application of
Newton's Laws alone is not sufficient to determine the member
forces. In order for a truss with pin-connected members to be
stable, it must be entirely composed of triangles. In
(Group 7) (DEPARTMENT OF STRUCTURE AND MATERIAL
ENGINEERING)
Page 3 of 24
mathematical terms, we have the following necessary condition
for stability:
M +R ≥ 2j
where
m = total number of truss members
j = total number of joints
r = number of reactions (equal to 3 generally)
When m = 2j − 3, the truss is said to be statically
determinate, because the (m+3) internal member forces and
support reactions can then be completely determined by 2j
equilibrium equations, once we know the external loads and the
geometry of the truss. Given a certain number of joints, this is
the minimum number of members, in the sense that if any
member is taken out (or fails), then the truss as a whole fails.
While the relation (a) is necessary, it is not sufficient for stability,
which also depends on the truss geometry, support conditions
and the load carrying capacity of the members.
Some structures are built with more than this minimum
number of truss members. Those structures may survive even
when some of the members fail. They are called statically
indeterminate structures, because their member forces depend
on the relative stiffness of the members, in addition to the
equilibrium condition described.
In a statically indeterminate truss, static equilibrium alone
cannot be used to calculated member force. If we were to try, we
would find that there would be too many “unknowns” and we
Using the 1 unit load method, we can calculate the forces of each
member due to the unit load, 1 N at member 6 and calculate the
reaction force using the equation.
∑ M = 0 ∑ Fx = 0 ∑ Fy = 0
Consider moment at point A:
ΣMA = 0
HB (1) – 1 (1) + 1 (1) = 0
HB = 0 N
ΣHX = 0
HA + HB + 1 - 1 = 0
HA = 0 N
ΣFB = 0
-FB + 1 - 1 = 0
FB = 0 N
(Group 7) (DEPARTMENT OF STRUCTURE AND MATERIAL
ENGINEERING)
Page 19 of 24
ALTERNATIVE METHOD
EXAMPLE OF CALCULATION
FOR MEMBER 6
P =
P =
P =
(Group 7) (DEPARTMENT OF STRUCTURE AND MATERIAL
ENGINEERING)
Page 20 of 24
7.0 DISCUSSION
7.1 From table 3, compare your answer to the experimental values. Comment on the accuracy of your result.
Refer to table 3, the value in experimental force were differ with the theoretical value. There were in member 1,2,5,6 and 8. It was because parallax, the equipment has not fully function correctly. It is maybe the device were not well maintenance . Secondly, it maybe from environment in the lab. The device were sensitive with vibration and wind. But the member 3,4,7 almost same with theoretical force.
7.2 Compare all of the member forces and the deflection to those from statically determinate frame. Comment on them in terms of economy and safety of the structure.
There have positive and negative force with tensile and compression at all member. Some structures are built with more than this minimum number of truss members. Those structures may survive even when some of the members fail or deflection, because their member forces depend on the relative stiffness of the members, in addition to the equilibrium condition described. These can be economy for structure.
Failure occurs when the load (L) effect exceeds the ability (R) of the structure, and can be derived by considering the probability density functions of R and L, along with their random variables. The main goal for the safety of the structure is to guarantee an R>L scenario throughout the design life of the structure.
7.3 What problem could you for seen if you were to use a redundant frame in a “real life’ application. (Hint: look at the zero value for the strain reading once you have included the redundant member by winding up thumbnut).
The structure will be failed if the load are exceed the ability. In this experiment, the value and size are not same with ‘real life’ but the application is too same. In my knowledge, the redundant frame always used in bridge construction to stability and the redundant frame are useable for esthetic value sometimes.
In this experiment, we use few type of different load from 50N till 250N to evaluate the data from the trusses. The most important of these criteria is the structure’s ability to carry load safely. The limit load for this equipment is 350N. The calculation to evaluate of structural safety can only be done mathematically and the experimental force data that we collected from digital reading than be compared with the theoretical force value that be done manually as we studied in analysis structure module. As the graph load vs. deflection is been plotted, the result was as similar to the linear.
Some mistake when reading the value, this is parallax error. And the equipment is not in a good condition. It would be impractical, uneconomical, and unsafe for the structural engineer to evaluate a bridge design by building a full-size prototype. When a structure is built, it must be stiff enough to carry its prescribed loads and fully corrected when reading the value. There will be a small “ralat” in every experiment and it can’t be avoided but any how we should prevent it so that it will not affect the calculation or stiffness of the structure.
We suggest making the maintenance for the equipment and exchanging the damage tool. This is because the student can’t get the correct value for those experiments.