Top Banner
16. The Three Rs: The Way Forward Michael Balls It is now 20 years since Russell and Burch last met to discuss, with others, the way forward for the Three Rs concept THE WISDOM OF RUSSELL AND BURCH Sitting at my computer, faced with the challenge of deciding what I could say in Wisdom 16, I suddenly realised that it was almost 20 years, to the day, since Bill Russell and Rex Burch met in Sheringham, a small seaside town in Norfolk, UK, for the first scientific meeting they had attended together since the publi- cation of The Principles in 1959 (Figure 1). Sadly, it was also to be the last such meeting, as Rex died a few months later. The meeting took place on 31 May to 3 June 1995, in the form of an ECVAM workshop, which I chaired in partnership with Alan Goldberg of CAAT. Our reason for being in Sheringham was that Rex was too ill to go more than a few miles from home, so Alan and I decided that we would invite some of those commit- ted to the Three Rs, to travel to meet him. The other participants included Claire Russell, and some of our colleagues from Germany, Italy, The Netherlands, the UK and the USA (Figure 2). An opening ceremony was held in the council chamber of Sheringham Town Hall, where Rex had rented space for his microbiology laboratory since the early 1970s. All the participants made a brief state- ment, and Bill sang a song, as he always did on spe- cial occasions. These opening proceedings were recorded on videotape. The rest of the workshop took place at the Links Country House Hotel in West Runton, about a mile from where I now live. The principal aims of the workshop were to discuss the current status of the Three Rs and to make rec- ommendations aimed at achieving greater accept- ance of the concept of humane experimental technique, and, in the interests of both scientific excellence and the highest standards of animal wel- fare, the more active implementation of reduction alternatives, refinement alternatives and replace- ment alternatives. The report of the workshop was published in the November/December 1995 issue of ATLA. 1 It reviewed the origins and evolution of the Three Rs concept as originally outlined in The Principles, 2 the selection of appropriate animal species, reduction alternatives, refinement alternatives and replacement alternatives, education and training, and certain special considera- tions (vaccines and immunobiologicals, transgenic ani- mals, special protection for selected animals, benefit and suffering, and the setting of targets). It concluded with 58 conclusions and recommendations, which were preceded by the following remarks: The workshop par- ticipants unanimously reaffirmed the principles put forward by Russell & Burch, that humane science is good science and that this is best achieved by vigorous application of the Three Rs: reduction alternatives, refinement alternatives and replacement alternatives. Thus, the only acceptable animal experiment is one which uses the smallest possible number of animals and causes the least possible pain or distress which is consistent with the achievement of a justifiable sci- entific purpose, and which is necessary because there is no other way of achieving that purpose. Any pro- posed experiments on animals should be subjected to prior and effective expert review by an ethics commit- tee or an equivalent body. The Three Rs should be seen as a challenge and as an opportunity for reaping ben- efits of every kind — scientific, economic and human- itarian — not as a threat. Many of the conclusions and recommendations are as relevant today as they were in 1995. The workshop was a memorable occasion in many other ways. It was run according to the ECVAM tradition — five days of hard work, interspersed with good food and good wine, with a determination to have the words of detailed conclusions and recommendations down on paper by the end. One of my lasting memories will be witnessing the pleasure shown by Bill and Rex, as they took the opportunity to sit and talk quietly together after a gap of more than 30 years. All I have to show of that is one out-of-focus photograph, taken during the final reception and dinner at Blickling Hall, on 2 June 1995 (Figure 3). Many developments of many kinds have taken place since 1995, but, as Roman Kolar spells out in ATLA 43, P25–P27, 2015 P25
3

THE WISDOM OF RUSSELL AND BURCH - Mines ParisTechcontroverses.mines-paristech.fr/public/promo15/... · ISSN 0261 1929 ©2015 FRAME FRAME Charity Registration Number 259464 Submissions

Oct 08, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: THE WISDOM OF RUSSELL AND BURCH - Mines ParisTechcontroverses.mines-paristech.fr/public/promo15/... · ISSN 0261 1929 ©2015 FRAME FRAME Charity Registration Number 259464 Submissions

16. The Three Rs: The Way Forward

Michael Balls

It is now 20 years since Russell and Burch last met to discuss, with others,

the way forward for the Three Rs concept

THE WISDOM OF RUSSELL AND BURCH

Sitting at my computer, faced with the challenge ofdeciding what I could say in Wisdom 16, I suddenlyrealised that it was almost 20 years, to the day, sinceBill Russell and Rex Burch met in Sheringham, a smallseaside town in Norfolk, UK, for the first scientificmeeting they had attended together since the publi-cation of The Principles in 1959 (Figure 1). Sadly, itwas also to be the last such meeting, as Rex died afew months later.

The meeting took place on 31 May to 3 June 1995,in the form of an ECVAM workshop, which I chairedin partnership with Alan Goldberg of CAAT. Our reasonfor being in Sheringham was that Rex was too ill togo more than a few miles from home, so Alan and Idecided that we would invite some of those commit-ted to the Three Rs, to travel to meet him. The otherparticipants included Claire Russell, and some of ourcolleagues from Germany, Italy, The Netherlands, theUK and the USA (Figure 2).

An opening ceremony was held in the councilchamber of Sheringham Town Hall, where Rex hadrented space for his microbiology laboratory since theearly 1970s. All the participants made a brief state-ment, and Bill sang a song, as he always did on spe-cial occasions. These opening proceedings wererecorded on videotape. The rest of the workshop tookplace at the Links Country House Hotel in WestRunton, about a mile from where I now live.

The principal aims of the workshop were to discussthe current status of the Three Rs and to make rec-ommendations aimed at achieving greater accept-ance of the concept of humane experimentaltechnique, and, in the interests of both scientificexcellence and the highest standards of animal wel-fare, the more active implementation of reductionalternatives, refinement alternatives and replace-ment alternatives.

The report of the workshop was published in theNovember/December 1995 issue of ATLA.1 It reviewedthe origins and evolution of the Three Rs concept asoriginally outlined in The Principles,2 the selection of

appropriate animal species, reduction alternatives,refinement alternatives and replacement alternatives,education and training, and certain special considera-tions (vaccines and immunobiologicals, transgenic ani-mals, special protection for selected animals, benefitand suffering, and the setting of targets). It concludedwith 58 conclusions and recommendations, which werepreceded by the following remarks: The workshop par-ticipants unanimously reaffirmed the principles putforward by Russell & Burch, that humane science isgood science and that this is best achieved by vigorousapplication of the Three Rs: reduction alternatives,refinement alternatives and replacement alternatives.Thus, the only acceptable animal experiment is onewhich uses the smallest possible number of animalsand causes the least possible pain or distress which isconsistent with the achievement of a justifiable sci-entific purpose, and which is necessary because thereis no other way of achieving that purpose. Any pro-posed experiments on animals should be subjected toprior and effective expert review by an ethics commit-tee or an equivalent body. The Three Rs should be seenas a challenge and as an opportunity for reaping ben-efits of every kind — scientific, economic and human-itarian — not as a threat.

Many of the conclusions and recommendations areas relevant today as they were in 1995. The workshopwas a memorable occasion in many other ways. It wasrun according to the ECVAM tradition — five days ofhard work, interspersed with good food and goodwine, with a determination to have the words ofdetailed conclusions and recommendations down onpaper by the end. One of my lasting memories willbe witnessing the pleasure shown by Bill and Rex, asthey took the opportunity to sit and talk quietlytogether after a gap of more than 30 years. All I haveto show of that is one out-of-focus photograph, takenduring the final reception and dinner at BlicklingHall, on 2 June 1995 (Figure 3).

Many developments of many kinds have takenplace since 1995, but, as Roman Kolar spells out in

ATLA 43, P25–P27, 2015 P25

Page 2: THE WISDOM OF RUSSELL AND BURCH - Mines ParisTechcontroverses.mines-paristech.fr/public/promo15/... · ISSN 0261 1929 ©2015 FRAME FRAME Charity Registration Number 259464 Submissions

P26

Figure 2: The workshop participants, in the Council Chamber of Sheringham Town Hall

This rare photograph of the two authors of The Principlestogether, has since been used in publications, all over the world.

Figure 1: Rex Burch and Bill Russell, outside Sheringham Town Hall, on the morning of31 May 1995, and the cover of the ECVAM workshop report

Page 3: THE WISDOM OF RUSSELL AND BURCH - Mines ParisTechcontroverses.mines-paristech.fr/public/promo15/... · ISSN 0261 1929 ©2015 FRAME FRAME Charity Registration Number 259464 Submissions

Professor Michael Ballsc/o FRAMERussell & Burch House96–98 North Sherwood StreetNottingham NG1 4EEUKE-mail: [email protected]

References 1 Balls, M., Goldberg, A.M., Fentem, J.H., Broadhead,C.L., Burch, R.L., Festing, M.F.W., Frazier, J.M., Hend -riksen, C.F.M., Jennings, M., van der Kamp, M.D.O.,Morton, D.B., Rowan, A.N., Russell, C., Russell,W.M.S., Spielmann, H., Stephens, M.L., Stokes, W.S.,Straughan, D.W., Yager, J.D., Zurlo, J. & van Zutphen,B.F.M. (1995). The Three Rs: The way forward. Thereport and recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 11.ATLA 23, 838−866.

2 Russell, W.M.S. & Burch, R.L. (1959). The Principles ofHumane Experimental Technique, xiv + 238pp. London,UK: Methuen.

3 Kolar, R. (2015). How long must they suffer? Successand failure of our efforts to end the animal tragedy inlaboratories. ATLA 43, 129−143.

4 Anon. (2000). The Three Rs Declaration of Bologna.ATLA 28, 1−5.

5 Balls, M. (2014). Animal experimentation and alterna-tives: Time to say goodbye to the Three Rs and helloto humanity? ATLA 42, 327−333.

The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique isnow out of print, but the full text can be found athttp://altweb.jhsph.edu/pubs/books/humane_exp/het-toc. An abridged version, The Three Rs and theHumanity Criterion, by Michael Balls (2009), can beobtained from FRAME.

this issue of ATLA,3 there is still much to beachieved, if the aims of the workshop and of TheThree Rs Declaration of Bologna,4 to which it led,are to be achieved, resulting in the revolution inbiomedical research and its application which wasproposed in The Principles. For my own part, I amconcerned that stating allegiance to the Three Rsconcept has become a convenient smokescreen, towhich lip service can be paid, whilst little is actuallypermitted to change. I have therefore proposed thatthe focus should now be more squarely on humanescience, which avoids the problem of seeming con-flicts between human benefit and animal welfare,5

and I am rather confident that Bill and Rex wouldapprove.

P27

ISSN 0261 1929 ©2015 FRAME FRAME Charity Registration Number 259464

Submissions for consideration for publication in PiLAS are welcome. Please send articles to [email protected], or by post to Susan Trigwell, FRAME, Russell and BurchHouse, 96–98 North Sherwood Street, Nottingham NG1 4EE, UK. Instructions to Authors are availablefrom the above, or from the PiLAS website, www.pilas.org.uk. All articles considered for publicationwill be peer-reviewed.

Figure 3: Bill Russell and Rex Burch, atBlickling Hall on 2 June 1995