Click here to load reader
Jul 10, 2020
THE TROPICAL ENVIRONMENT AND MALARIA IN
SOUTHWESTERN NIGERIA, 1861 – 1960
BY
ADEDAMOLA SEUN ADETIBA
Thesis Presented for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of
History, RHODES UNIVERSITY
Supervisor: Prof. Enocent Msindo
FEBRUARY 2019
i
CONTENTS
Contents……………………………………………………………………………… i
Abstract……………………………………………………………………………… ii
Acknowledgement…………………………………………………………………... iv
Chapter 1: Introduction: Malaria, Colonial Subjects, and Empire ………………….. 1
Chapter 2: Encountering the Tropical Environment: Early European Perceptions of
Southwestern Nigeria ……………………………………………………………… 24
Chapter 3: The Politics of Preventive Medicine in Southwestern Nigeria, 1861-1960 ….. 56
Chapter 4: The Early Stage of Malaria Research in Lagos, 1890 – c. 1930 ………………… 100
Chapter 5: Development Planning and Malaria Control in Southwestern Nigeria ………… 148
Chapter 6: The Contributions of Africans to Antimalarial Schemes in Southwestern Nigeria 194
Chapter 7: Conclusion ……………………………………………………………………… 236
Bibliography………………………………………………………………………………… 248
ii
ABSTRACT
This thesis is a social history of malaria in southwestern Nigeria. It contributes to the
burgeoning literature in the historiography of medicine, specifically the medicine and empire
debate. Key to the issues raised in this thesis is the extent to which the limitations in colonial
medical policies, most especially malaria control programmes, inspired critical and ingenious
responses from African nationalists, doctors, patients, research volunteers, and indigenous
medical practitioners. Challenged by a wide range of diseases and a paucity of health facilities
and disease control schemes, African rural dwellers became medical pluralists in the ways they
imagined and appropriated ideas of Western medicine alongside their indigenous medical
practices. Beginning with a detailed historical exploration of the issues that informed the
introduction of curative and preventive medicine in southwestern Nigeria, this thesis reveals
the focus of colonial medicine. It exposes the one-sided nature of medical services in colonial
spaces like southwestern Nigeria and the ways it shaped multifaceted responses from Africans,
who were specifically side-lined till the 1950s when the rural medical service scheme was
introduced.
The focus of colonial medicine is drawn from relatively rich but often subjective historical
evidence, such as a plethora of official reports of the department of medical and sanitary
services, official correspondences within the colonial government in Lagos and Nigeria, and
between the colonial government and the colonial office in the United Kingdom. Details of
African responses to medical policies were garnered from newspaper publications and
correspondences between the African public and the colonial government in Lagos. They
reveal very interesting details of the ways Africans imagined, reimagined, and appropriated
malaria control ideas and schemes.
iii
The central argument in this thesis is that attempts to control malaria in southwestern Nigeria
till the 1950s, were shaped by a single concern to ameliorate the implications of the disease on
the colonial state. It argues that this one-sided nature of malaria control programme informed
the basis for medical pluralism in most rural spaces where African communities became
patrons and sponsors of Western medicine and at the same time custodians of their indigenous
medical practices. The series of justifications for the sustenance of these services were
reinforced on the basis of the failure of the colonial state to guarantee the health needs of their
colonial subjects. The aim of the thesis is to reinforce arguments that portray colonial medicine
as a “tool of empire” but goes a bit further to explain the extent to which Africans related to
this reality. It states quite categorically that Africans were not docile and silent, but that they
acted decisively in ways that suited their varied interests and courses.
iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The work presented in this thesis benefited immensely from the contributions, encouragements,
and support of my supervisor, Professor Enocent Msindo. Professor Msindo was involved in
every phase of the research and the thesis through his critical comments and his kind reception
whether I faced certain hurdles. Also, he was instrumental in recommending the African
Pathways Scholarship to me during the first year of my studentship. He has since played the
role of a supervisor, mentor, and career advisor.
The data used in writing this thesis were garnered from several onsite and digital archives and
libraries. I would like to acknowledge the archivists that assisted me during my ten-month
fieldwork at the National Archives, Ibadan, Nigeria. I also appreciate the London School of
Hygiene and Tropical Medicine archives, for allowing me to access several documents in their
Ross Collection. Adam Matthew Digital Archive was generous enough to grant a trial request
to my University Library when I made a request, even at a short notice. I was able to access
their rich collections of the CMS medical missions in Africa and other records of the colonial
office. The British Online Archives was also useful in my quest to garner more information
about the colonial office.
I am immensely grateful to the staff of Rhodes University Library. They made this research an
easy and productive one. I was able to access bountiful newspaper records on colonial Nigeria
through the library interface. I also owe a load of gratitude to the department office, especially
the departmental secretary for helping with some admins, even when they were not convenient.
This research benefited from a generous joint-scholarship award from the National Institute of
Humanities and Social Research (NIHSS) and the Council for the Development of Social
Science Research in Africa. The funds, workshops, conferences, and mentorship provided by
the NIHSS were important in the successful completion of this thesis. Professor Paul Maylam
v
and Professor Fred Hendriks, mentors of the NIHSS in Rhodes University, were very
supportive with their encouragement and feedback during the period of my study in the
university. I also appreciate the department of history and the platform of the ‘History in the
Making’ seminar where some of the ideas in this thesis were presented and highly critiqued by
colleagues and academic staff of the department.
Most of all, and quite appropriate for this thesis and programme, I would like to appreciate my
family, for their unconditional love and care throughout these years. My parents, Pastor and
Mrs. Adetiba, my siblings, Kayode, Bisola, Busayo and my wife, Adepeju have been very
supportive during these couple of years. My friends, Deji, Dimeji, Afolabi, Dotun, Thapelo,
Jako, Sinazo, Omowunmi (and her beautiful family), Niran, John Onakwe, Bankole, Kola, and
Adeola Samuel have also assisted in very important ways during the course of writing this
thesis. Yinka Anifowose provided some funds to cushion some of my expenses during the first
year of the programme. After receiving these individual and institutional supports, I remain
solely responsible for any omissions and mistakes that may be found in this thesis.
1
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION: MALARIA, COLONIAL SUBJECTS, AND THE PLIGHT OF
EMPIRE
The challenges of malaria remain a topical and recurring issue in discourses on development
in sub-Saharan Africa. State and non-state institutions have been committed to channelling a
feasible course for ameliorating the impact of the disease on infant and maternal health. Since
the 1950s, controlling the disease has featured in development goals of the United Nations, and
has been a significant item in the foreign policy of African states and that of foreign donors.
At present, tackling malaria remains a contingent part of the Sustainable Development Goals
and the agendas of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Global Funds, and the World
Health Organization. Since 1998, the World Health Organization has invested considerably to
eradicating the disease in Africa through her Roll Back Malaria programme. While the malarial
problem remains perpetual in this part of the world, remarkable progress has been recorded
elsewhere. The WHO, in May 2015, launched the Global Technical Strategy for Malaria 2016-
2030 programme to keep track on