Top Banner
THE PROBLEM The gap between the evidence (from science, from nature itself) and action
29

THE PROBLEM The gap between the evidence (from science, from nature itself) and action.

Dec 24, 2015

Download

Documents

Ruby Marshall
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: THE PROBLEM The gap between the evidence (from science, from nature itself) and action.

THE PROBLEM

The gap between the evidence (from science, from nature itself) and

action

Page 2: THE PROBLEM The gap between the evidence (from science, from nature itself) and action.

Social Identities and Cognitions

• We are ‘hard wired’ to respond to risks that are tangible, imminent and threaten us with immediate losses

• We understand the world according to the interpretive communities we belong to.

• We approach ‘evidence’ using selective attention and various ‘cognitive biases’.

Page 3: THE PROBLEM The gap between the evidence (from science, from nature itself) and action.

What’s missing?

• Limits to human rationality are acknowledged but the model used is still basically one of the rational actor.

• A focus on cognitions, frames and narratives but emotions are still largely missing from the picture.

• Change efforts are directed at the individual/family and institutions (governments, corporations) but the cultural dimension is neglected.

Page 4: THE PROBLEM The gap between the evidence (from science, from nature itself) and action.

institutions

culturepeople

Page 5: THE PROBLEM The gap between the evidence (from science, from nature itself) and action.

The individual and society

Society has the capacity to either bring out the best or the worst in us

Page 6: THE PROBLEM The gap between the evidence (from science, from nature itself) and action.

PSYCHOANALYTICALLY INFORMED PERSPECTIVES

• “Go, go, go said the bird: human kindCannot bear very much reality”T.S.Eliott, Burnt Norton

Page 7: THE PROBLEM The gap between the evidence (from science, from nature itself) and action.

A Culture of Narcissism

• We see ourselves as uniquely entitled (as individuals, as developed countries, as a species)

• We have an instrumental relation to others and to nature (human and natural resources)

• The illusion of mastery/control possesses the mind of both the individual and of the human species

Page 8: THE PROBLEM The gap between the evidence (from science, from nature itself) and action.

Our culture is poorly equipped to enable us to face the facts of life – our mortality, frailty & limits; our vulnerability to chance and fate;

our dependency on others/nature for what is life-affirming

Page 9: THE PROBLEM The gap between the evidence (from science, from nature itself) and action.

We struggle against the feelings elicited by climate change

• Loss and grief regarding the destruction around us

• Guilt at our role in this destruction• Anxiety when we look into the future• Despair when we imagine that we lack the

resources to change what is happening

Page 10: THE PROBLEM The gap between the evidence (from science, from nature itself) and action.

CLIMATE CHANGE DENIAL

DENIALISMNEGATION

DISAVOWAL

Page 11: THE PROBLEM The gap between the evidence (from science, from nature itself) and action.

The person and denial

Page 12: THE PROBLEM The gap between the evidence (from science, from nature itself) and action.

Disavowal

One part of the mind sees and knows, another part of the mind says

“this cannot be true”

Page 13: THE PROBLEM The gap between the evidence (from science, from nature itself) and action.

The non-unitary mind

• Different parts of the mind see, desire and experience the world in different ways

• We are always in conflict with ourselves and manage these conflicts as best as we can

• Whilst some parts of the mind seek truth and growth other parts oppose this

• We confront climate change through a series of dilemmas in which we feel pulled in different directions

Page 14: THE PROBLEM The gap between the evidence (from science, from nature itself) and action.

“I did not say this young man was lying. I said I am unable to believe him. There is a difference.” Supreme Court Judge Felix Frankfurter on hearing an eye witness account of the clearing of the

Warsaw Ghetto

Page 15: THE PROBLEM The gap between the evidence (from science, from nature itself) and action.

Disavowal

Just Don’t Think About It

Page 16: THE PROBLEM The gap between the evidence (from science, from nature itself) and action.

“you know it's one of those things, the environment, it is a bit like eating meat; if I do it, recognising full well that, how it is produced is often horrendous, and I just choose not to think too much about that, even though, you know in my head, and through reading and understanding you know I know that it is not, not a good scene. And maybe the environment is a bit like that you know, I close off a little bit of, erm, you know I am aware of that something is going on”. (Male, teacher, 30’s)

Page 17: THE PROBLEM The gap between the evidence (from science, from nature itself) and action.

Disavowal

Splitting Thought from Feeling

Page 18: THE PROBLEM The gap between the evidence (from science, from nature itself) and action.

I can remember very clearly when I, er, must have been in my late 20s early 30s, sitting at Heathrow airport with

my wife about to catch a flight somewhere, and her remarking that a 747 taking off generates more damage

to the environment, er, than a family car driven for a year; and I remember noting this fact with interest, although not at any point changing my view about where we should go on 747s. (male, academic, 50s,

partner of fossil fuel company exec)

Page 19: THE PROBLEM The gap between the evidence (from science, from nature itself) and action.

Recent psychoanalytic thinking about denial sees it as a central

component of a more encompassing ‘perverse state of mind’ which provides protection

from anxiety and pain (John Steiner (1993) Psychic Retreats.

London: Routledge)

Page 20: THE PROBLEM The gap between the evidence (from science, from nature itself) and action.

STATE OF MIND

• An organised configuration of feeling states, (ph)fantasies, relations between parts of the self, defence mechanisms, etc.

• Perverse State of Mind: As if there is an establishment in the mind with which parts of the self ally, partly because they are seduced, partly out of fear. Self deception, collusion and an ‘artful’ relation to the truth are the order of the day. When change threatens this alliance the establishment offers furious resistance.

Page 21: THE PROBLEM The gap between the evidence (from science, from nature itself) and action.

A PERVERSE RELATION TO REALITY

• Persisting in error as in, i) a blatant or willful refusal to accept error or responsibility or, ii) persisting in a course of action that is clearly going to be damaging to self and others.

• ‘Artful’ engagement with the truth• Perverse insistence upon the opposite (‘fair is

foul’, war is peace)• To lead astray, from the true/right course (as

in ‘perverting the course of justice’)

Page 22: THE PROBLEM The gap between the evidence (from science, from nature itself) and action.

PERVERSE INSTITUTIONS

Page 23: THE PROBLEM The gap between the evidence (from science, from nature itself) and action.

PERVERSE INSTITUTIONS EPITOMISED BY BANKING SECTOR

• CULTURE OF ENTITLEMENT• ORGANISED DISAVOWAL• COLLUSION• INSTRUMENTAL RELATIONS DOMINANT• Susan Long (2008) The Perverse

Organisation and the Seven Deadly Sins. London: Karnac

Page 24: THE PROBLEM The gap between the evidence (from science, from nature itself) and action.

PERVERSE GOVERNANCE

• THE CREATION OF AN ‘AS IF’ REALITY, A VIRTUAL REALITY OF TARGETS, INDICATORS, COMPARATORS WHICH, THROUGH A COLLECTIVE ACT OF SELF-DECEPTION, POLICY MAKERS COME TO BELIEVE IS REALLY REAL

• THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS VIRTUAL REALITY THEN HAS A NUMBER OF PERVERSE CONSEQUENCES

Page 25: THE PROBLEM The gap between the evidence (from science, from nature itself) and action.

PERVERSE THINKING IN CLIMATE CHANGE INSTITUTIONS

• Some things cannot be thought about• Collusion occurs across the boundary

separating different groups of stakeholders – eg. Scientists and policy makers

• Virtualism and International policy making (Kyoto, Paris)

Page 26: THE PROBLEM The gap between the evidence (from science, from nature itself) and action.

Some things cannot be thought about

• “But there is a mentality in that group that speaks to policy makers that there are some taboo topics . For instance… policy makers that have said we must limit climate change to two degrees. Well the emissions are going up like this [gestures] so two degrees at the moment seems completely unrealistic. But you’re not allowed to say this. So its, kind of, if you say it you have to be super cautious” (Leading UK climate scientist)

Page 27: THE PROBLEM The gap between the evidence (from science, from nature itself) and action.

THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM

• Climate science and policy has focused on influencing the billions of emitters rather than the few thousand producers.

• “A policy on climate change that ignores production of fossil fuels is like a policy on drugs that ignores the poppy fields, cocaine labs, smuggling networks, and dealers and focuses exclusively on the addicts” (George Marshall: Don’t Even Think About It )

Page 28: THE PROBLEM The gap between the evidence (from science, from nature itself) and action.

VIRTUALISM

• “The language of Kyoto and Copenhagen is the language of targets, and the danger is that it is precisely this language….that will appeal to governments who need to look as if they are doing something while safe in the knowledge that they will not be in power when it becomes clear that the targets are not being met”

Page 29: THE PROBLEM The gap between the evidence (from science, from nature itself) and action.

Perverse Culture

• A culture of entitlement• A culture of ‘uncare’ • Cynicism• Deep Acting• Preoccupation with Resilience