The MAREM project: Greece group Greece group - Duygu Söyler, Eliz E. Hyuseinova, Andreas Sajgaschew, Jolke Mertesacker 1 Different views of collective.

Greece group - Duygu Söyler, Eliz E. Hyuseinova, Andreas Sajgaschew, Jolke Mertesacker

1

The MAREM project:Greece group

Different views of collective actors on refugees in Greece


2

Table of content

1.Introduction

2.Research Question

3.State of the art

4.Data

5.Research Results

6.Conclusion

7.References


3

Introduction

Population: about 11 Mio.Area: about 132.000 km²Unemployment rate: 27,3 % (2013)

History of migration: With the collapse of the Soviet Union Greece became a receiving country for many people from the East. It is considered as the eastern gate of Europe.

Government: President of Greece : Karolos Papoulias ( Panhellenic Socialist Movement) ( since 2005) Prime Minister: Antonis Samaras ( New Democracy) (since 2012)


4

IntroductionNational migration policy: Greek migration policy is conform to EU guidlines. Up to 2010 the procedure has been regulated by Presidential Decrees. And since 2011 there is a new law (“law 3907”) assigning the creation of 13 Asylum Services

Asylum and new asylum applicants: 8.225 (2013)

Final descisions on applications (2013) :

Most important countries of origin: Afghanistan, Syria, Iran, Iraq, Somalia, Eritrea, Congo, Pakistan, Bangladesh

Total number of decisions: 3900 Rejected: 2990 Total positive decisions: 910


5

Research Question

How do the views of the different types of organizations differ from each other

concerning the situation of refugees in Greece ?


6

State of the art

1. Why Greece is not a Safe Host Country for Refugees - Achilles Skordas and Nicholas Sitaropoulos, Journal of Refugee Studies (2005) 18 (3): 299-318.

2. Modern Greek Asylum Policy and Practice in the Context of the Relevant European Developments – Nicholas Sitaropoulos, Journal of Refugee Studies (2000) 13 (1): 105-117.

3. Refugee welfare in Greece: towards a remodeling of the responsibility-shifting paradigm? – Nicholas Sitaropoulos, Critical Social Policy (2002) 22 (3): 436-455.


7

Data

Expert Interviews with 5 NGO´s (Aitima, Hellenic Migration Policy Institute (IMEPO), Amnesty International, Ecumenical refugee program (ERP), Social Center)

Expert Interview with one police man Expert Interview with an university professor Expert Interview with a social organisation (Afghan Community)

Narrative interviews with two refugees in Athens


8

DataCharacteristics

Actor types

Organization Norms/values(religious, political, human rights etc.)

Dominant issue (only on A&R or multiple)

Field of legitimation (regional, local, national, EU, global)

Internal/balanced/external logics (resources)

Official-executive actors

Police Protection of the order in the state

multiple national external

A&R-related NGOs

AitimaERPSocial CenterAfghan CommunityAmnesty International

SupportReligiousPolitical/supportSupport

human rights

multipleA&Rmultiplemultiple

multiple

regionalnationalregionalregional

global

externalexternalinternalInternal

balanced

Scientific organizations

IMEPO (first governmental, now NGO)

Scientific multiple national balanced


9

Research question

How do the views of the different types of organizations differ from each other

concerning the situation of refugees in Greece ?


10

Research resultsIMEPO:

“ You know the law from the EU says that we can not keep them even if we can. Only for 1 year and a half, not more (…) so it is also not possible to sent these people back to their countries. This problem belongs to the EU, because you have to keep your borders safe, but how is it possible to do that. If we try to stop them outside our borders, then we have a problem with the Geneva … Refugees. We have to give them the right to enter in our country, to seek asylum, to examine if they have the right to take the refugee status or not, and then to send them back. But if they are already in the country it is impossible for us to send them back so they stay here.”

“First, to stop the new incomers, second- to try to help the people who are already here, maybe also share them with the other European countries, of course based on the economical situation and the total population of each country, and help them to become legal, and third one- to change some of the law and the policy about the migration issues. We have to accept that the EU are not 27 separated countries, but that we are together with this problem.”


11

Research results:

IMEPO:

IMEPO suggests to close all borders, but gives the responsibility to the European Union. This organization appoints to the legal procedure of taking refugees and asylum seekers. A bureaucratic solution with a procedure which sends people after a while back.

IMEPO appoints on a change in the European and national laws of migrants.

Burden sharing: “We have to accept that the EU is not 27 separated countries, but that we are together in this problem.”

Rational and mathematical solution for burden sharing because of the comparison of the economical status of each European Country. (The states with high welfare should take more refugees and asylum seekers than e.g. Greece.)


12

Research results

Amnesty International :

“We have to understand that people and government, that migration does happen and there is no way to stop it. We need to approve the human rights“. […] “The other problem is the access to asylum, it doesn't exist. The process is too long, they do not have access to lawyers and translators, across Europe.“

Amnesty Internationals focus is on human rights and from their perspective the asylum procedure is unfair

The work of Amnesty International is more depended on the governmental level

Amnesty International Greece said, that they get many calls from detention centers because of conditions there


13

Research resultsSocial Center:

“It's the way, they do not want to stop the problem, they need to keep a balance, a balance means, if they want to solve the problems. […] first they need to stop giving money for this detention centers. Because, why they give this? Because the European Countries get preferred with this situation. […] it's the aim, to not let the people come to the rest of Europe. For this they created Schengen, Dublin 1,2 &3, […] it is easier to come from Turkey to Greece, than from Greece to Italy.”

Associated with the left-wing political background of this situation, the Social Center explains that this system works because of the “bureaucratic barrier” which was made by the Dublin conventions and Schengen, about asylum seekers and refugees from the (economic) wealth in the Northern European Countries

The situation in the detention centers is for the Social Center the most important issue


14

Research resultsAitima:

“Europe should … create a system which provides for fair distribution of people”

“ […]because now there is a law saying that if Greece people can do the same job asylum seekers cannot get a working permit. So on the one hand they don´t get any benefit and on the other they cannot work[…]”

Also explaining the problem of the access to the labour market for refugees and asylum seekers, of course associated with the situation after the economic collapse in Greece in 2009

Government does not pay for the asylum seekers and refugees, also no access to the labour market.


15

Conclusion

Similarities:

- Opinion: The situation of the refugees in Greece is relative bad

- Explanation: Lack of (financial) governmental support and unavailability of work permit

- Solution: Fair-minded allocation of asylum seekers in whole Europe


16

Conclusion

Differences:

IMEPO: Supporting the idea of closing the borders. Bureaucratic solution for this problem. Demands a change in laws (for more regulated asylum procedure).

Amnesty International: Working on governmental level with a appeal to the human rights

Social Center: Radical criticism on the Dublin Convention, the Schengen-area and the laws made by European Union.

Aitima: Supports a fair distribution of asylum seekers and refugees. Also criticizes the detention centers. European Union should change the system.


17

Conclusion

All NGOs and interview partners explained, that this is not a Greek problem but an European problem. All interview partners have an opinion, that Dublin 1,2,3 is not ensuring a fair procedure of taking asylum seekers and refugees. They feel forsaken by the European Union in how to deal with the migration of asylum seekers and refugees.

IMEPO was the only organization which defines this problem on economics and statistics.The other organizations refer to a solution which includes regard for human rights anda direct appeal to stop this systematic detention of people.


18

References Achilles Skordas and Nicholas Sitaropoulos, 2005: Why Greece is not a

Safe Host Country for Refugees. In: Journal of Refugee Studies Volume 18, Number 3, pp. 299-318.

European Migration Network – Country overview Greece http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/what-we-do/networks/european_migration_network/index_en.htm (25.06.2014)

Eurostat http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/eurostat/home/ (25.06.2014)

Nicholas Sitaropoulos, 2002: Refugee welfare in Greece: towards a remodeling of the responsibility-shifting paradigm?. In: Critical Social Policy, Volume 22, Number 3, pp. 436-455.

Nicholas Sitaropoulos, 2000: Modern Greek Asylum Policy and Practice in the Context of the Relevant European Developments. In: Journal of Refugee Studies, Volume 13, Number 1, pp. 105-117.

UNHCR – official website http://www.unhcr.org/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/home (25.06.2014)

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/what-we-do/networks/european_migration_network/index_en.htm



http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/eurostat/home/

http://www.unhcr.org/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/home


19

The MAREM project: Greece group Greece group - Duygu Söyler, Eliz E. Hyuseinova, Andreas Sajgaschew, Jolke Mertesacker 1 Different views of collective.

Documents

greece slide

art greece group duygu

andreas sajgaschew

president of greece

jolke mertesacker

soviet union greece

athens slide

national migration policy