Click here to load reader
May 27, 2020
Synthesis and applications of Rhodamine derivatives as fluorescent probes
Mariana Beija, Carlos A. M. Afonso and José M. G. Martinho
Received 26th January 2009
First published as an Advance Article on the web 27th April 2009
DOI: 10.1039/b901612k
Rhodamine dyes are widely used as fluorescent probes owing to their high absorption coefficient
and broad fluorescence in the visible region of electromagnetic spectrum, high fluorescence
quantum yield and photostability. A great interest in the development of new synthetic
procedures for preparation of Rhodamine derivatives has arisen in recent years because for most
applications the probe must be covalently linked to another (bio)molecule or surface. In this
critical review the strategies for modification of Rhodamine dyes and a discussion on the variety
of applications of these new derivatives as fluorescent probes are given (108 references).
Introduction
Rhodamine dyes are fluorophores that belong to the family of
xanthenes along with fluorescein and eosin dyes. The general
structures of xanthene chromophore and rhodamine dyes are
represented in Fig. 1.
Due to their excellent photostability and photophysical
properties, rhodamines are used as laser dyes,1,2 fluorescence
standards (for quantum yield3 and polarization4), pigments
and as fluorescent probes to characterize the surface of
polymer nanoparticles,5,6 fluidity of lipid membranes,7 as well
as in the detection of polymer-bioconjugates,8 studies of
adsorption of oligonucleotides on latexes,9,10 studies of structure
and dynamics of micelles,11 single-molecule imaging12,13 and
imaging in living cells.14–16
Rhodamine derivatives have also been employed as
molecular switches,17 as a thermometer,18,19 for surface
modification of a virus20 and particularly as chemosensors
used either in vitro as in vivo in detection of Hg(II), Cu(II),
Fe(III), Cr(III), thiols among other analytes.21–32 Recently,
Gonçalves reviewed the fluorescent labelling of biomolecules
using organic probes, highlighting the importance of
rhodamine derivatives for that application.33
Fig. 1 Molecular structures of xanthene (A) and rhodamine dyes (B).
Centro de Quı́mica-Fı́sica Molecular and IN–Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Instituto Superior Técnico, 1049-001, Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]; Fax: +351 218 464 455
Mariana Beija
Mariana Beija was born in São Paulo (Brazil) in 1981. She studied Chemistry in Instituto Superior Técnico (Technical University of Lisbon, Portugal), where she received a school merit award in 2000. In 2004, she started her PhD in Chemistry jointly supervised by Prof. José M. G. Martinho, in Centro de Quı́mica-Fı́sica Molecular (Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisbon, Portugal), and Dr Marie-Thérèse Charreyre, in Unité Mixte CNRS-
bioMérieux (Lyon, France). Her doctoral research consisted of the synthesis of novel dye-labelled thermoresponsive block copolymers by RAFT polymerization, involving the synthesis of rhodamine-derived RAFT agents.
Carlos A. M. Afonso
Carlos A. M. Afonso gradu- ated from University of Coimbra (1984) and received his PhD in 1990 from New University of Lisbon. He worked for one year as post- doctoral fellow at the Imperial College of Science Technology and Medicine under the supervision of Prof. W. B. Motherwell (1990) and one more academic year of sabbatical leave (1997/98) at the University of Bath, UK (Prof. J. Williams) and at the University of Toronto
(Professor R. Batey). In 2004 he moved to Instituto Superior Técnico as associate professor and in 2008 received his Agregação. His research focus is mainly on the development of more sustainable methodologies in asymmetric organic transformations.
2410 | Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 2410–2433 This journal is �c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009
CRITICAL REVIEW www.rsc.org/csr | Chemical Society Reviews
D ow
nl oa
de d
by U
ni ve
rs id
ad e
T ec
ni ca
d e
L is
bo a
(U T
L )
on 0
3 O
ct ob
er 2
01 2
Pu bl
is he
d on
2 7
A pr
il 20
09 o
n ht
tp ://
pu bs
.r sc
.o rg
| do
i:1 0.
10 39
/B 90
16 12
K View Online / Journal Homepage / Table of Contents for this issue
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b901612k http://pubs.rsc.org/en/journals/journal/CS http://pubs.rsc.org/en/journals/journal/CS?issueid=CS038008
Although for some of those applications the dye is used in
its free form, for most of them the probe must be attached to
another molecule (polymer, oligonucleotide, biomolecule, etc.)
or surface. In order to obtain these rhodamine conjugates,
usually a reaction between a nucleophilic functionality in the
molecule of interest and a 40- or 50-activated rhodamine
derivative [in Fig. 1(B): G = activated ester, an acyl chloride,
a sulfonyl chloride or a isothiocyanate functionality] is
carried out. Several of these activated dyes are commercially
available. However, either they are found as a mixture of
isomers or isomerically pure dyes have extremely high costs
(more than 40 000 h/g), which is prohibitive when there is a
need for several grams of product and when further synthetic
steps will take place.
Hence, in order to obtain derivatives of a Rhodamine dye in
a large amount, it is necessary to synthesise it. Aiming to do
that, the condensation reaction that leads to formation
of Rhodamine dyes has to be carried out using previously
functionalized reagents. Another possibility is to modify less
expensive unfunctionalized commercially available rhodamines.
Herein, the synthetic strategies for functionalization of
Rhodamine dyes will be reviewed and the reasons for the
choice of a particular synthetic pathway will be discussed. In
order to contextualize the potential applications, a brief
introduction on the photophysics of Rhodamine dyes is also
included.
Photophysical properties
Depending on the substituents R1, R2, R3, R4, G and even on
the counter ion X� (usually Cl�, Br� or ClO4 �),1 the dye will
present different photophysical properties in solution, such as
absorption and emission maxima (lmaxabs , l max em , fluorescence
lifetime (t) and fluorescence quantum yield (f). The major differences in the photophysical properties of
Rhodamines are explained by the non-radiative deactivation
by internal conversion. The internal conversion has both
activated and non-activated components.34 In rhodamine dyes
which carry none, only one alkyl substituent at each nitrogen
(these latter derivatives normally bear an alkyl group as R4) or
when the amino groups are rigidised, the activated process is
absent and the quantum yield of these dyes is very high and
independent of temperature.34,35 In opposition, rhodamine
dyes with two alkyl substituents at each nitrogen show
activated internal conversion and consequently the quantum
yield and fluorescence lifetime vary with temperature.
The activated process seems to be associated with a non-
fluorescent twisted intramolecular charge-transfer (TICT)36
state characterized by an electron transfer from the amino
groups to the xanthene ring followed by a rotation between
them.37 The energy of the TICT state is higher than the energy
of the first excited singlet state for the dyes without activated
processes and lower for those with activated internal
conversion. Then, the activated energy dissipation is explained
by the population of the TICT state that is non-emissive and
deactivates quickly to the ground state.38 The non-activated
process involves energy dissipation by C–H and N–H
streching modes coupled with high frequency vibration modes
of the solvent. The N–H vibration modes are found to be very
effective in the dissipation of the electronic energy to hydroxylic
solvents.1,2 Rhodamine 101 (Rho 101) and Rhodamine B
(Rho B) are among the most used rhodamines and present
an interesting behaviour with pH and solvent polarity (Fig. 2).
In acidic solutions, the carboxyl group is protonated and the
rhodamine dye is found in its cationic form. However, in basic
solution, dissociation occurs and the rhodamine dye is
converted into a zwitterion. Although both the cationic and
zwitterionic forms share the same chromophore, the negative
charge has an inductive effect on the central carbon atom of
xanthene chromophore, leading to a hypsochromic shift
of both absorption and fluorescence maxima and a slight
reduction of the extinction coefficient at lmaxabs . The differences in the specific dye-solvent interaction were also invoked to
explain the small differences in quantum yield and lifetime for
the cationic and zwitterionic forms.39 In less polar organic
solvents, the zwitterionic dye undergoes a reversible
conversion to a colorless lactone due