HOUSING SECTOR SWOT ANALYSIS Presented by: Dir. Zaki A. Abanes Housing and Urban Development Coordinating Council
HOUSING SECTOR SWOT ANALYSIS
Presented by:Dir. Zaki A. Abanes
Housing and Urban Development Coordinating Council
SECTOR AND POLICIESSTRENGHTS
• NATIONAL SHELTER PROGRAM, HOUSINGAND URBAN DEVELOPMENTFRAMEWORK AND URBAN POLICYAGENDA ARE IN PLACE .
COMPLETED THE FORMULATION OF THEFOLLOWING:PHILIPPINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN ONSHELTER 2011-2016NATIONAL URBAN DEVELOPMENT ANDHOUSING FRAMEWORK (NUDHF)NATIONAL INFORMAL SETTLEMENTSUPGRADING STRATEGIES (NISUS)NATIONAL URBAN POLICY AGENDA(NUPA)
• ENABLING LEGISLATIONS WERE ENACTEDSUPPORTING THE DEVOLUTION OFGOVERNANCE AND CONTINUEDPROVISION OF DECENT ANDAFFORDABLE HOUSING AND SUSTAINEDFUNDING FOR PRO-POOR HOUSING.
ENACTED INTO LAWS THE FOLLOWING:RA 7279 – URBAN DEVELOPMENT ANDHOUSING ACTRA 7160 – LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODERA 7835 – COMPREHENSIVE ANDINTEGRATED SHELTER FINANCE ACTRA 9679 – STRENGTHENING PAG-IBIGFUND
SECTOR AND POLICIESSTRENGHTS
• MAINSTREAMING OF CLIMATECHANGE ADAPTATION (CCA) ANDDISASTER RISK REDUCTIONMANAGEMENT (DRRM) IN THENATIONAL AND LOCAL PLANS
MAINSTREAMED CCA AND DRRM INTHE CLUP AND LSP
• ADOPTION OF CITYWIDEAPPROACH TO ADDRESS ISF’SHOUSING
ADOPTED THE CITYWIDE APPROACHTO COME-UP WITH APROGRAMMATIC, DECENTRALIZEDAND PARTICIPATORY MANNER INTHE DELIVERY OF HOUSINGSERVICES.
SECTOR AND POLICIESWEAKNESSES
• SHORTAGE OF AFFORDABLE NEWLOW-INCOME HOUSING IN THEMARKET PARTICULARLY IN URBANAREAS
• AVERAGE ANNUAL HOUSINGPRODUCTION – 100,000 UNITS
• AVERAGE ANNUAL HOUSING NEED– 900,000
• OVER REGULATED ENVIRONMENTFOR HOUSING AND URBANDEVELOPMENT
• INEFFICIENT LAND MANAGEMENTPOLICY
• DELAYS IN OBTAINING NECESSARYCLEARANCES, CERTIFICATIONSAND LICENSES
SECTOR AND POLICIESWEAKNESSES
• INNEFECTIVE URBAN PLANNINGAND LAND MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS
• UNPLANNED URBAN GROWTH• POOR ENFORCEMENT OF LAND
USE PLANNING AND ZONINGREGULATIONS
• URBAN SPRAWL• ENCROACHMENT ON
ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICALAREAS
• LACK OF AVAILABLE LAND FORRESIDENTIAL PURPOSE
• ONLY 4% OF THE ESTIMATEDTOTAL LAND AREA IN THECOUNTRY OR 0.54 MILLIONHECTARES ARE ALIENABLE ANDDISPOSABLE
SECTOR AND POLICIESOPPORTUNITIES
• GROWING HOUSING NEED • 5.56 MILLION UNITS BY END OF 2016
• GLOBALIZATION AND URBAN-LEDGROWTH TO DRIVE THE NATIONALECONOMY
• GROWTH IN THE PHILIPPINES HASBEEN ROBUST FOLLOWING A 7.2%GROWTH IN 2013 AND 6.1%. IN 2014.
• PHILIPPINES IS LIKELY TO SUSTAIN ITSGROWTH WELL UP TO 2020 AND THEPROPERTY SECTOR WILL CONTINUE TOBE THE BIGGEST BENEFACTOR
• CONSIDERABLE POTENTIAL FOR SELF-HELP APPROACHES
• LONG HISTORY OF COMMUNITY ANDNGO INVOLVEMENT IN DEVELOPMENT
• PEOPLE’S PLAN
• ENTHUSIASM OF LOCAL EXECUTIVESFOR IMPROVEMENT OF SERVICES
• IMPLEMENTATION OF INNOVATIVEPROGRAMS BY SOME AGGRESSIVELOCAL ADMINISTRATORS
• MANAGING URBAN AREAS ASCENTERS OF ECONOMIC GROWTH
• BUILD ON GOVERNMENT’S ROLE AS ANENABLER IN THE HOUSING SECTOR
• GUIDING DEVELOPMENT ANDPROVIDING RESOURCES.
SECTOR AND POLICIESTHREATS
• RAPID RATE OF URBANIZATIONWITH INCREASINGCONCENTRATION OF MIGRATIONTO A FEW MAJOR URBAN AREAS
• RAPID DETERIORATION OF URBANENVIRONMENT
• INCREASING INCIDENCE OFPOVERTY
• SOCIO ECONOMIC INEQUALITIES
• GROWTH IN THE PHILIPPINEECONOMY HAS NOT SIGNIFICANTLYREDUCED POVERTY
• DESPITE ECONOMIC GAINS,PHILIPPINE GOVERNMENT ISUNLIKELY TO MEET ITS 2016 MDGTARGET ON POVERTY REDUCTIONOF 16.6%.
• INNEFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION OFHOUSING AND URBANDEVELOPMENT POLICIES ANDPROGRAMS
• MANY POLICIES ARE NEVERENACTED
• REGULATIONS ARE NOT ENFORCEDE.G. 20% BALANCED HOUSING
• ADVERSE IMPACT OF CLIMATECHANGE
• FOR THE LAST FIVE YEARS, 1.8MILLION HOUSING UNITS WEREPARTIALLY AND TOTALLYDAMAGED.
INSTITUTIONSSTRENGHTS
• LONG ESTABLISHED ANDEXPERIENCED HOUSING AGENCIESWITH CLEAR MANDATES
• BASIC INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTUREFOR HOUSING AND URBANDEVELOPMENT IS IN PLACE (E.O.90)
• BASIC SECTOR COORDINATINGMECHANISM IS IN PLACE
PLATFORMS FOR DISCUSSIONALREADY IN PLACE:• HOUSING POLICY WORKING
COMMITTEE• LOCAL INTER-AGENCY COMMITTEE
INSTITUTIONSWEAKNESSES
• WEAK COORDINATIVE MANDATE OFHUDCC WITH RESPECT TO DEPARTMENTSAND AGENCIES OUTSIDE THE IMMEDIATEDEPARTMENTAL STRUCTURE
• EVIDENT PARTICULARLY IN URBANDEVELOPMENT PLANNING, REGULATIONAND PRODUCTION
• THE SCOPE AND DEPTH OF HUDCC’SROLE IN TERMS OF LEVEL OFAUTHORITY, FUNCTIONALRESPONSIBILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITYHAS NEITHER BEEN CLEARLY DEFINEDNOR ARTICULATED UNDER EXISTINGLAWS.
• UNCLEAR RELATIONSHIP OF HUDCC WITHLGUS
• POLICY AND OPERATIONALRELATIONSHIP OF HUDCC WITH THELGUS NOT CLEARLY DEFINED
• INADEQUATE NATIONAL AND LOCALGOVERNMENTS CAPACITY TO MANAGEURBAN DEVELOPMENT, IMPLEMENTDEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS ANDPROJECTS AND PROVIDE URBANSERVICES.
• LACK OF CAPACITY OF LGUS TO FULLYASSUME DEVOLVED FUNCTIONS EITHERDUE TO LACK OF FUNDS OR CAPACITY
• LACK OF CAPACITY OF HUDCC ONURBAN DEVELOPMENT
• OVERLAPPING FUNCTIONS OF AGENCIES • DUPLICATION OF FUNCTIONS BETWEENGOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS
INSTITUTIONSOPPORTUNITIES
• INCREASED PARTICIPATION OFPRIVATE SECTOR IN THEPROVISION, DELIVERY ANDFINANCING OF HOUSING ANDURBAN SERVICES
• HARNESSING PRIVATE SECTORFULL POTENTIAL IN FINANCINGAND PRODUCING HOUSING.
• FURTHER EMPHASIS IN NATIONALGOVERNMENT POLICY TOWARDSDECENTRALIZATION ANDDEVOLUTION
• INFUSION OF MORE AUTHORITY,RESPONSIBILITY ANDACCOUNTABILITY TO LGUS
• COMMUNITY AND CIVIL SOCIETYPARTICIPATION IN HOUSING ANDURBAN DEVELOPMENT
• ENCOURAGING IN SYSTEMATICMANNER, CSO PARTICIPATION INADDRESSING HOMELESSNESS
INSTITUTIONSTHREATS
• NON ENACTMENT INTO LAWS OFTHE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSINGAND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ANDNATIONAL LAND USE ACT.
• FAILURE TO ENACT THESE LAWSWOULD MEAN THAT THE HUDCCWOULD REMAIN AS A MERECOORDINATING BODY ONHOUSING AND URBANDEVELOPMENT AND NONRATIONALIZATION OF LANDALLOCATION, UTILIZATION,MANAGEMENT ANDDEVELOPMENT.
• FAILURE OF THE NATIONALGOVERNMENT TO SUPPORT TRUEDEVOLUTION TO THE LOCALAUTHORITIES.
• DESPITE THE PASSAGE OF THELOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE, FULLSUPORT FOR DEVOLUTION IS NOTFORTHCOMING
FINANCESTRENGHTS
• MODEL SOCIAL HOUSING PROGRAM INPLACE
• COMMUNITY MORTGAGE PROGRAM
• ENABLING LAWS SUPPORTING THEDEVELOPMENT OF VIABLE ANDSUSTAINABLES SOURCES OF FUNDS FORHOUSING ALREADY ENACTED INTO LAWS:SECURITIZATION ACT, REIT
PROMOTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF CAPITALMARKET AS A RESULT OF THE ENACTMENT OFTHE FOLLOWING LAWS:• SECURITIZATION ACT• REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST ACT
• NATIONAL SAVINGS SYSTEM FOR HOUSINGIN PLACE IN THE FORM OF PROVIDENTFUND
• HOME DEVELOPMENT MUTUAL FUND-MANDATORY SAVINGS SCHEME FORHOUSING OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATESECTOR EMPLOYEES
• LOCAL GOVERNMENTS GIVEN INCREASEDPOWER TO RAISE RESOURCES
• TRANSFER OF POWERS TO LGUS TOACCESS THE CREDIT MARKET THROUGHLOANS AND ISSUANCE OF MUNICIPALBONDS.
• INCENTIVES TO ENCOURAGE NAXIMUMPRIVATE SECTOR PARTICIPATION IN LOW-COST HOUSING ALREADY IN PLACE.
• REDUCTION AND SIMPLIFICATION OFQUALIFICATION AND ACCREDITATIONREQUIREMENTS
• CREATION OF ONE STOP OFFICES• SIMPLIFICATION OF FINANCING
PROCEDURES• TAX INCENTIVES
FINANCEWEAKNESSES
• LIMITED RESOURCES FOR HOUSING • GOVERNMENT ALLOCATION FORHOUSING ONLY ACCOUNTS TO LESSTHAN 1% OF NATIONAL BUDGET
• NON-SUSTAINABLE SOCIAL HOUSINGFINANCE SYSTEM
• PRIMARY SOURCE OF FUNDS FORGOVERNMENT SOCIALIZED HOUSINGPROGRAM IS THRU THE GAA
• MORTGAGE INSTRUMENT FORSOCIALIZED HOUSING IS NOTATTRACTIVE ON ACCOUNT OF FIXEDAND BELOW MARKET RETURNS, LOWCOLLECTION RATES, ETC.
• PREVIOUS INSOLVENCY OF THE LOW-MIDDLE INCOME HOUSING FINANCESYSTEM
• INSOLVENCY AND RECAPITALIZATIONOF HOUSING AGENCIES.
• INSUFFICIENT LOCAL RESOURCEGENERATION BY THE LOCALGOVERNMENT
• LOCAL REVENUES OF THE CITIES ANDMUNICIPALITIES ARE SMALL RELATIVETO THE CENTRAL TRANSFERSRECEIVED THROUGH IRA
• LOW-LEVELS OF COST RECOVERY FORHOUSING
• NHA’S CER RANGES FROM 30-35%• SHFC’S CER ON THE AVERAGE RANGES
FROM 62-72%.
FINANCEWEAKNESSES
• HIGH INVENTORY OF NON-PERFORMING LOANS (NPL)
• NPL OF THE HOUSING AGENCIESTOTALED TO 316,000 UNITS OFTHE 1.1 MILLION OUTSTANDINGLOANS
• LOW AFFORDABILITY LEVEL OFTARGET BENEFICIARIES
• BASED ON 2009 FIES, ONLY ABOUT 12.8% OF TOTAL FAMILY INCOME CAN BE ALLOCATED FOR HOUSE RENT/RENTAL VALUE
FINANCEOPPORTUNITIES
• GREATER PARTICIPATION OF THEBANKING AND FINANCIAL SECTOR INHOUSING AND URBANDEVELOPMENT
• BASED ON THE REPORT OF BSP,RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE LOANSOF COMMERCIAL BANKS HAVEBEEN INCREASING SINCE 2010 –FROM P92.2 B IN 2010 TO P247BILLION IN JUNE 2015.
• REFORM OF THE HOUSING SUBSIDYSYSTEM
• THERE IS A MOVE TO A MOREAPPROPRIATE TARGETINGSUBSIDIES TO SEPARATE THEMFROM TRANSACTIONS IN THEHOUSING FINANCE MARKET.
• DEVELOPMENT OF AN ACTIVE ANDLIQUID SECONDARY MORTGAGEMARKET
• THERE IS A CLAMOR FOR A MAJORSTRENGTHENING OF THE PRIMARYMORTGAGE MARKET TO MAKEMORTGAGE INSTRUMENT MOREATTRACTIVE TO INVESTORS.
• NHMFC CHARTER AMENDMENTSINCREASING ITS CAPITALIZATION TOP50.0 BILLION
FINANCEOPPORTUNITIES
• IMPROVED ENVIRONMENT FORLGUS TO RAISE AND BORROWFUNDS FOR HOUSING AND URBANDEVELOPMENT
• DEVELOPMENT OF A LOCALGOVERNMENT CREDIT RATINGAND LOAN GUARANTEE SYSTEMWILL ENCOURAGE BETTERACCESS TO THE CREDIT MARKETS
• MULTIPLIER EFFECT OF HOUSINGAND EMPLOYMENT GENERATION
• MULTIPLIER EFFECT OF HOUSING– 1.92 TIMES
• EMPLOYMENT GENERATION –THE CONSTRUCTION OF ONELOW-COST HOUSING UNIT,PROVIDES EMPLOYMENT TO 8CONSTRUCTION WORKERS.
FINANCETHREATS
• BSP ISSUANCE SETTING A CAP TO REALESTATE LOANS OF LOCAL BANKS AT 60PERCENT OF THEIR COLLATERAL VALUES,DOWN FROM THE AVERAGE OF 80PERCENT AT PRESENT.
• REQUIRES HIGHER EQUITY FROM HOMEBORROWERS
• GOVERNMENT’S INABILITY TO PROVIDENATIONAL SUBSIDIES TO THE HOUSINGPROGRAM
• LACK AND IRREGULARITY OF RELEASESOF FUNDS NEEDED TO SUPPORTSUBSIDIES IN THE HOUSING SECTORCAN JEOPARDIZE THE IMPLEMENTATIONOF HOUSING PROGRAMS ANDPROJECTS.
• LIMITED PARTICIPATION OF THEFORMAL PRIVATE SECTOR IN THE SOCIALHOUSING SECTOR.
• LITTLE INTEREST OF PRIVATEDEVELOPERS AND BANKS TOPARTICIPATE IN THE SOCIAL HOUSINGSECTOR DUE TO LOW-RETURN ININVESTMENTS.
• STRINGENT REQUIREMENTS OF UTILITYCOMPANIES.
• THE DISTRIBUTION SERVICES AND OPENACCESS RULES OBLIGATES DEVELOPERSTO ADVANCE THE AMOUNT NEEDED TOCOVER THE EXPENSES OF EXTENDINGELECTRICAL LINES AND INSTALLINGADDITIONAL FACILITIES.