Top Banner
131-1 Part ix Keratoplasty Section 6 Endothelial Keratoplasty Chapter 131 Surgical Technique for DMEK Kevin J. Shah, Michael D. Straiko, Mark A. Greiner sequential approach to this technique and highlights several vital intraoperative techniques that can make DMEK a reproducible, predictable, and successful procedure. Injectors One of the key steps in DMEK surgery is the safe and con- trolled delivery of the fragile DMEK scroll into the anterior chamber. The ideal DMEK injector should have multiple features including: A closed system that prevents backflow from the anterior chamber and is capable of maintaining anterior chamber volume A material that is safe for the endothelium No need for viscoelastic Easy loading with minimal handling of the graft An adequate caliber to avoid compression of the graft A tapered tip to seal the surgical incision well. Currently there are no FDA-approved DMEK injectors. American surgeons have found many creative off-label methods around this obstacle. Many surgeons use modified intraocular lens injection cartridges for this purpose. 1–4 The Staar microinjector (Staar Surgical Company, Monrovia, CA) was one of the most common inserters initially used for DMEK in the US (Fig. 131.1B). The Staar injector is an open system with a foam plunger and requires a viscoelastic agent to help deliver the tissue. This technique risks the introduc- tion of viscoelastic into the anterior chamber during tissue injection, which can impede graft attachment. 5 Another popular IOL cartridge based system is the Viscoject IOL injec- tor (Bausch & Lomb, Aliso Viejo, CA) (Fig. 131.1A). The Price group reported improved rebubble rates when transitioning from the Staar injector with the use of viscoelastic to the Viscoject, which does not require viscoelastic and is a small closed-system inserter. 6 A similar closed-system injector can be created with the AMO Emerald One Series IOL cartridge (Abbot Laboratories Inc., Abbot Park, IL), with a few key differences compared to other IOL cartridge injectors (Fig. 131.1D). Assembled with a standard Luer-Lok syringe filled with BSS and 14-French gauge nasogastric tubing, the Emerald One Series IOL car- tridge is large enough that it can be used to aspirate the graft into the injector and small enough to be used through a 2.75 mm clear corneal incision. Similar to other injectors Key Concepts A closed-system injector is ideal for controlled delivery of a DMEK graft. Creating a recipient stromal bed of slightly greater diameter than the donor graft improves graft attachment. Creating a peripheral iridotomy is vital in preventing pupillary block. Obtaining correct graft orientation is critical for a successful outcome. The primary techniques used to unfold and center a DMEK graft include fluid or air injection, corneal tapping, and/or anterior chamber depth modulation. The use of sulfur hexafluoride 20% has decreased graft detachment rates. Introduction Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is the only surgical procedure that provides a true anatomic exchange of diseased endothelium and Descemet membrane with healthy donor tissue. There are several advantages of DMEK compared to Descemet stripping endothelial keroto- plasty (DSEK), including faster visual recovery, lower rejec- tion rate, and higher quality of vision. However, graft preparation, iatrogenic graft failure, and previously reported high rates of graft detachment are obstacles that have pre- vented many corneal surgeons from adopting this surgery. With eye banks now preparing DMEK tissue, more corneal surgeons are beginning to adopt DMEK as the risk of pre- operative tissue loss has been eliminated. Similar to DSEK, all corneal surgeons will experience a learning curve with DMEK and should select their first patients keeping this in mind. This chapter discusses the authors’ experiences performing DMEK and provides a literature-based review of surgical techniques that have been implemented with DMEK. While the techniques necessary to perform DMEK are different than DSEK, successful out- comes can be achieved routinely. This chapter outlines a ISBN: 978-0-323-35757-9; PII: B978-0-323-35757-9.00131-X; Author: Mannis & Holland; 00131 ISBN: 978-0-323-35757-9; PII: B978-0-323-35757-9.00131-X; Author: Mannis & Holland; 00131 c00131 p0045 u0050 u0055 u0060 u0065 u0070 s0010 p0080 p0085 s0015 p0090 u0075 u0080 u0085 u0090 u0095 u0100 p0125 Mannis_7579_Chapter 131_main.indd 1 8/23/2016 4:34:25 PM To protect the rights of the author(s) and publisher we inform you that this PDF is an uncorrected proof for internal business use only by the author(s), editor(s), reviewer(s), Elsevier and typesetter Toppan Best-set. It is not allowed to publish this proof online or in print. This proof copy is the copyright property of the publisher and is confidential until formal publication.

Surgical Technique for DMEK - Mosby · Keratoplasty. Section 6. Endothelial Keratoplasty. Chapter . 131. Surgical Technique for DMEK. Kevin J. Shah, Michael D. Straiko, Mark A. Greiner.

Jun 05, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Surgical Technique for DMEK - Mosby · Keratoplasty. Section 6. Endothelial Keratoplasty. Chapter . 131. Surgical Technique for DMEK. Kevin J. Shah, Michael D. Straiko, Mark A. Greiner.

131-1

Part ix Keratoplasty

Section 6 Endothelial Keratoplasty

Chapter 131

Surgical Technique for DMEKKevin J. Shah, Michael D. Straiko, Mark A. Greiner

sequentialapproachtothistechniqueandhighlightsseveralvital intraoperative techniques that can make DMEK areproducible,predictable,andsuccessfulprocedure.

Injectors

OneofthekeystepsinDMEKsurgeryisthesafeandcon-trolleddeliveryofthefragileDMEKscrollintotheanteriorchamber. The ideal DMEK injector should have multiplefeaturesincluding:

• Aclosedsystemthatpreventsbackflowfromtheanteriorchamberandiscapableofmaintaininganteriorchambervolume

• Amaterialthatissafefortheendothelium• Noneedforviscoelastic• Easyloadingwithminimalhandlingofthegraft• Anadequatecalibertoavoidcompressionofthegraft• Ataperedtiptosealthesurgicalincisionwell.

Currently there are no FDA-approved DMEK injectors.American surgeons have found many creative off-labelmethodsaroundthisobstacle.Manysurgeonsusemodifiedintraocularlensinjectioncartridgesforthispurpose.1–4TheStaarmicroinjector(StaarSurgicalCompany,Monrovia,CA)was one of the most common inserters initially used forDMEKintheUS(Fig.131.1B).TheStaarinjectorisanopensystemwithafoamplungerandrequiresaviscoelasticagenttohelpdeliverthetissue.Thistechniqueriskstheintroduc-tionofviscoelasticintotheanteriorchamberduringtissueinjection, which can impede graft attachment.5 AnotherpopularIOLcartridgebasedsystemistheViscojectIOLinjec-tor(Bausch&Lomb,AlisoViejo,CA)(Fig.131.1A).ThePricegroupreportedimprovedrebubblerateswhentransitioningfrom the Staar injector with the use of viscoelastic to theViscoject,whichdoesnotrequireviscoelasticandisasmallclosed-systeminserter.6

Asimilarclosed-systeminjectorcanbecreatedwiththeAMOEmeraldOneSeriesIOLcartridge(AbbotLaboratoriesInc.,AbbotPark,IL),withafewkeydifferencescomparedtootherIOLcartridgeinjectors(Fig.131.1D).Assembledwitha standard Luer-Lok syringe filled with BSS and 14-Frenchgauge nasogastric tubing, the Emerald One Series IOL car-tridge is large enough that it can be used to aspirate thegraftintotheinjectorandsmallenoughtobeusedthrougha2.75mmclearcornealincision.Similartootherinjectors

Key Concepts

• Aclosed-systeminjectorisidealforcontrolleddeliveryofaDMEKgraft.

• Creatingarecipientstromalbedofslightlygreaterdiameterthanthedonorgraftimprovesgraftattachment.

• Creatingaperipheraliridotomyisvitalinpreventingpupillaryblock.

• Obtainingcorrectgraftorientationiscriticalforasuccessfuloutcome.

• TheprimarytechniquesusedtounfoldandcenteraDMEKgraftincludefluidorairinjection,cornealtapping,and/oranteriorchamberdepthmodulation.

• Theuseofsulfurhexafluoride20%hasdecreasedgraftdetachmentrates.

Introduction

Descemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplasty(DMEK)istheonly surgical procedure that provides a true anatomicexchangeofdiseasedendotheliumandDescemetmembranewithhealthydonor tissue.Thereare several advantagesofDMEKcomparedtoDescemetstrippingendothelialkeroto-plasty (DSEK), includingfastervisual recovery, lowerrejec-tion rate, and higher quality of vision. However, graftpreparation,iatrogenicgraftfailure,andpreviouslyreportedhighratesofgraftdetachmentareobstaclesthathavepre-ventedmanycorneal surgeons fromadopting this surgery.WitheyebanksnowpreparingDMEKtissue,morecornealsurgeons are beginning to adopt DMEK as the risk of pre-operativetissuelosshasbeeneliminated.

Similar to DSEK, all corneal surgeons will experience alearning curve with DMEK and should select their firstpatients keeping this in mind. This chapter discusses theauthors’ experiences performing DMEK and provides aliterature-basedreviewofsurgicaltechniquesthathavebeenimplementedwithDMEK.While the techniquesnecessarytoperformDMEKaredifferent thanDSEK, successful out-comes can be achieved routinely. This chapter outlines a

ISBN:978-0-323-35757-9;PII:B978-0-323-35757-9.00131-X;Author:Mannis&Holland;00131ISBN:978-0-323-35757-9;PII:B978-0-323-35757-9.00131-X;Author:Mannis&Holland;00131

c00131

p0045

u0050

u0055

u0060

u0065

u0070

s0010

p0080

p0085

s0015

p0090

u0075

u0080u0085u0090u0095u0100

p0125

Mannis_7579_Chapter 131_main.indd 1 8/23/2016 4:34:25 PM

To protect the rights of the author(s) and publisher we inform you that this PDF is an uncorrected proof for internal business use only by the author(s), editor(s), reviewer(s), Elsevier and typesetter Toppan Best-set. It is not allowed to publish this proof online or in print. This proof copy is the copyright property of the publisher and is confidential until formal publication.

Page 2: Surgical Technique for DMEK - Mosby · Keratoplasty. Section 6. Endothelial Keratoplasty. Chapter . 131. Surgical Technique for DMEK. Kevin J. Shah, Michael D. Straiko, Mark A. Greiner.

CHAPTER 131

surgicalTechniqueforDMEK

131-1.e1

Chapter Outline

IntroductionInjectorsrecipientpreparationWoundCreationGraftOrientationUnscrollingandCenteringGraftTamponadeWithAirorsulfurHexafluoride20%

ISBN:978-0-323-35757-9;PII:B978-0-323-35757-9.00131-X;Author:Mannis&Holland;00131ISBN:978-0-323-35757-9;PII:B978-0-323-35757-9.00131-X;Author:Mannis&Holland;00131

u0010u0015u0020u0025u0030u0035u0040

Mannis_7579_Chapter 131_main.indd 1 8/23/2016 4:34:30 PM

To protect the rights of the author(s) and publisher we inform you that this PDF is an uncorrected proof for internal business use only by the author(s), editor(s), reviewer(s), Elsevier and typesetter Toppan Best-set. It is not allowed to publish this proof online or in print. This proof copy is the copyright property of the publisher and is confidential until formal publication.

Page 3: Surgical Technique for DMEK - Mosby · Keratoplasty. Section 6. Endothelial Keratoplasty. Chapter . 131. Surgical Technique for DMEK. Kevin J. Shah, Michael D. Straiko, Mark A. Greiner.

131-2

PART ix KErATOplAsTy

Section 6 EndothelialKeratoplasty

allowsslow,controlleddeliveryoftissuewithoptimalante-rior chamber maintenance. An additional feature of theDMEK Jones tube is a central dilation, which results indecreasedfluidvelocityinthecentralportionoftheinjectorrelative to the tip. This differential in velocity helps topreventexcessivegraftaspirationandmaximizecontrolofgraftdelivery.

With all closed-system DMEK injectors, care must betakentoavoidover-pressurizationoftheanteriorchamber.InjectionofexcessBSScreatesanunfavorablepressuregradi-entthatcanresult inejectionor incarcerationofthegraftwhentheinjectortipiswithdrawn.Toavoidthissituation,theauthorsrecommendreleasingfluidfromaparacentesispriortowithdrawingtheinjector,oratanytimethesurgeonfeels the eye is becoming over-pressurized. Additionally,shallowing the anterior chamber after graft insertion andpriortoinjectorremovalcanmaintaingraftorientationandsimultaneouslybegintheunfoldingprocess.Anothertech-nique for reducing graft ejection is by pressing a secondinstrument(e.g.30-Gcannula)atopthemainincisionwhilewithdrawingtheinjector,essentiallycreatinga“trapdoor”at the wound. It is also helpful in many situations toposition thegraftnear theopeningof the injector so thatit is introduced into the eye with minimal influx of BSS(Video131.1).

madeofclearortranslucentmaterials,graftorientationcanoftenbemaintainedduring injection.Theauthors suggestusing a 1mL or 3mL Luer-Lok syringe with this injectorto further enhance controlled delivery into the anteriorchamber.Anoptional3-waystopcockcanalsobeaddedtothe injector for safety to removeairbubbles and refill thesyringewithoutdisturbingtheloadedgraft(Fig.131.1D).

Glass injectors have been promoted in the Europeanliterature.7–9SeveralEuropeantechniquesutilizeglassinjec-tors such as the curved glass pipette made by the DutchOphthalmicResearchCenter(DMEKsurgicaldisposableset;DORC, Zuidland, The Netherlands) or the Geuder glassinjector (Geuder AG, Heidelberg, Germany). Glass poten-tiallyoffersasmoothersurfacethanplasticandmaycauseless endothelial cell damage. Surgeons have also adoptedoff-labeluseofaglassJonestube(DMEKJonestube#80000-DMEK,GuntherWeissScientific,Portland,OR).JonestubesareFDAapprovedforlacrimalsurgery.Similartothemodi-fiedAMOinjector,theJonestubecanbeusedtoaspiratethegraft into the inserter, reducing forceps contact with thegraftandtheriskofendothelialcelltrauma.Coupledwith14-French gauge nasogastric tubing, the Jones tube isattached to a3mLor5mL syringe full ofBSS, creating aclosedsystemwithafluidreservoirfortissueinjectionandchamber maintenance (Fig. 131.1C). The technique also

Fig. 131.1  (A–E) DMEK injectors. Multiple closed-system injectors have been used to deliver the DMEK graft into the eye. To date, there is no FDA-approved DMEK injector system in the US. 

A: Viscoject IOL injector and tip (a)

B: The staar microinjector and tip (b)

C: DMEK jones tube and tip (c)

D: Modified AMO emerald IOL injector and tip (d)

E: Alcon B cartridge

A a

B

C

D

E

d

c

b

ISBN:978-0-323-35757-9;PII:B978-0-323-35757-9.00131-X;Author:Mannis&Holland;00131

f0010

p0130 p0135

Mannis_7579_Chapter 131_main.indd 2 8/23/2016 4:34:26 PM

To protect the rights of the author(s) and publisher we inform you that this PDF is an uncorrected proof for internal business use only by the author(s), editor(s), reviewer(s), Elsevier and typesetter Toppan Best-set. It is not allowed to publish this proof online or in print. This proof copy is the copyright property of the publisher and is confidential until formal publication.

Page 4: Surgical Technique for DMEK - Mosby · Keratoplasty. Section 6. Endothelial Keratoplasty. Chapter . 131. Surgical Technique for DMEK. Kevin J. Shah, Michael D. Straiko, Mark A. Greiner.

131-3

CHAPTER 131

surgicalTechniqueforDMEK

AkintoDSAEKsurgery,therearemultiplewaystoinsertDMEK graft tissue. Whether the injector material is a keycomponent as suggested by Dapena etal.7 or the injectordesignismoreimportantassuggestedbyKimetal.1remainsto be seen. Interestingly, in their small series, Kim etal.foundapostoperativeendothelialcellloss(ECL)of28±16%withanAlconBcartridgeattachedtoasyringeofBSS.ThisfindingcomparesfavorablytotheECLof12–29%foundbyHametal. intheir largerstudyusingaclosed-systemglassinjector.9Thesedata suggest that thedesign featuresofaninjector (e.g. a closed system) may prove more importantthanitsmaterialproperties.Furtherclinicaltrialsandlabora-toryworkwithvitaldyestainingforendothelialdamagewillberequiredtobetterinformthisimportanttopic.

Recipient Preparation

PreparationoftherecipienteyeforsuccessfulDMEKsurgeryinvolves creation of surgical incisions, removal of therecipient’s Descemet membrane and corneal endothelium,constriction of the pupil, and creation of a peripheraliridotomy.

Wound Creation

The authors prefer a temporal approach, in the widestcornealdimension,tohelpensuretheprimaryincisionwillnot interferewithgraft implantation.Thenumberof totalincisionsneededforDMEKsurgeryvariesbasedonsurgicaltechnique.ThemajorityofDMEKsurgeonswillcreatetwoto four paracentesis incisions in addition to the primaryincision.Paracentesisincisionsof1mmarecreatedsuperiorandinferiortothemaintemporalincision.AllwoundsforDMEKshouldbeself-sealing,asthisaidsgreatlyinchamberstabilityandsubsequentpositioningofthegraft.Makingtheincisionsparalleltotheirisplanefacilitatesthecreationofself-sealingparacenteses.It ishelpfultomarktheentrance

Table 131.1 CharacteristicsofvariousDMEKinjectors

Injector Incision Materials needed Unique properties

Viscoject IOL injector 2.4 mm Viscoject IOL injector Need to remove springGraft is loaded like an IOL, not aspirated

Staar Microinjector 3.0 mm Requires viscoelastic Graft is loaded like an IOL, not aspirated

DMEK Jones tube 3.2 mm Gunther Weiss DMEK modified Jones Tube14-French gauge nasogastric tubing3 mL syringe

Glass material may be safer for endothelium3 mL syringe for controlled injection and chamber maintenanceCentral dilation to control fluidics

Modified AMO Emerald One Series injector

2.75 mm AMO Emerald One cartridge1 mL Luer-Lok syringe 14-French gauge nasogastric tubingOptional Safety additions3-way stopcock3 mL Luer-Lok syringe

1 mL syringe for controlled injectionA backup 3-way stopcock valve for removing air bubbles and refilling injector if necessary (useful in leaking wounds)

Alcon B cartridge 2.8 mm 3 mL Luer-Lok syringeVarious adapters to join to a syringe

Can be difficult to create a watertight closed system between the cartridge and the syringe

of the incisions with a surgical marking pen so that theparacentesescanbe locatedandaccessedeasilyduring thesurgicalprocedure.Theinternalopeningoftheparacentesesshould not overlap with the area where the graft will beplaced.Aftertheparacentesisincisionsaremade,theprimaryincision is created.Theprimary incision is sized tofit theinjector chosen by the DMEK surgeon (Table 131.1). Theprimary incision should allow a snug fit with the DMEKinjectorandpreventfluidegress,whichcouldriskflushingthe graft out of the main incision during graft injection.Althougha self-sealing stable incision is ideal, theauthorsrecommend suturing even the smallest main incisions toavoidanypotentiallossofthegraft,air,orgasduringlatermaneuvers.

Endothelium-Descemet membrane resection

Aftercreatingthesurgicalincisions,thediseasedendothelium-Descemet membrane complex (EDM) is stripped from thehost cornea. This step can be accomplished in numerouswaysbut it iswidelyagreed that thecreationofa smoothareaofresectionwithoutresidualDescemetmembrane(DM)orstromalfibrilsisofutmostimportance.10ResidualtagsofDMand stromalfibrilsmayallowfluid to collectbetweenthe graft and the recipient stroma, thereby preventingattachmentofthegraft. Itmayalsoresult inasuboptimalinterface,whichcancompromisethevisualqualityinDMEKpatients.Krusewas thefirst to report a lower rateof graftseparationandsubsequentre-bubblingwhenthegraftdoesnotoverlapwithhostDM.10To avoidoverlap, the areaofstrippingonthehostcorneashouldbeslightlylargerthanthediameterof theplannedDMEKgraft (Fig.131.2).ThisresultsinasmallareaofbareposteriorstromadevoidofanyDMcoverage.Initially,theremaybecornealedemaoverly-ing theuncoveredareas; theedematypically resolvesoverdays toweeks, likely asdonor endothelial cellsmigrate tocover the bare stroma.11 The potential increase in graftattachmentmayresultinalossincelldensityasdonorcells

ISBN:978-0-323-35757-9;PII:B978-0-323-35757-9.00131-X;Author:Mannis&Holland;00131

t0010

p0140

s0020

p0145

s0025

p0150

s0030

p0155

Mannis_7579_Chapter 131_main.indd 3 8/23/2016 4:34:26 PM

To protect the rights of the author(s) and publisher we inform you that this PDF is an uncorrected proof for internal business use only by the author(s), editor(s), reviewer(s), Elsevier and typesetter Toppan Best-set. It is not allowed to publish this proof online or in print. This proof copy is the copyright property of the publisher and is confidential until formal publication.

Page 5: Surgical Technique for DMEK - Mosby · Keratoplasty. Section 6. Endothelial Keratoplasty. Chapter . 131. Surgical Technique for DMEK. Kevin J. Shah, Michael D. Straiko, Mark A. Greiner.

131-4

PART ix KErATOplAsTy

Section 6 EndothelialKeratoplasty

to cause miosis. Gentle stroking of the iris surface with ablunt instrument can also be used to augment the mioticeffect; however, this may predispose the patient towardsgreaterintraocularinflammationanddevelopmentofcystoidmacular edema postoperatively. The authors recommendagainst application of carbachol and pilocarpine as theprolonged effect may encourage development of posteriorsynechiae.DuetotheimportanceofasmallpupilinDMEK,somehaveadvocatedforstagedsurgeryonly,andavoidanceofthetripleprocedurewhenvisuallysignificantcataractsarepresentconcurrentlywithendothelialdecompensation.

ForDMEKtripleprocedures,adequatevisualizationofthelensisnecessaryforthecataractsurgeryportionofthecase.TheauthorsavoidpreoperativeNSAIDsandexcludedilatingagentsfromtheirrigatingsolutionasbothprolongdilation.Dilation for the cataract surgery portion of a DMEK tripleprocedure can be achieved with intraocular epinephrinealone,orwithpreoperativeinstillationoftopicalphenyleph-rine 2.5% drops and a topical cycloplegic agent such as asingle drop of mydriacil 0.5%. The authors recommendavoidanceofmorepotenttopicalcycloplegicagents,astheireffectsarenotreadilyreversible.

Thereareseveraladditionalconsiderationswhenperform-ing DMEK surgery in conjunction with cataract surgery.FollowingDMEKsurgerythereisahyperopicshift,likelyduetodeturgesenceof the cornea.Hamet al.have reported ahyperopicshiftof1/3ofadiopteronaverage.13Whenselect-ing an IOL, the authors target mild myopia of −0.5D to−0.75Dtoaccommodatethisshiftandachieveafavorableemmetropic or slightly myopic result in the majority ofpatients. DMEK triple procedures can provide additionalchallenges,especiallyearlyinthesurgeon’slearningcurve.Theintraocularlensisnotfullystabilizedjustafterinsertion,whichcanmaketheprocedurechallenging.Asmallercap-sulorhexiscanhelpkeepthelensimplantfromprolapsingandimprovelensimplantstability.Inahighlymyopiceye,theanterior chamberwillbeconsiderablydeeperafter thecataractportionofthecaseandcancontributetodifficultyunscrollingthegrafttissue.Insuchcases,considerationmaybegiventostagingthesurgeryinsteadofacombinedpro-cedure. Additionally, it is possible to inadvertently fill theentirecapsularbagandanteriorchamberwithairorgasinDMEKtripleprocedures.Shouldthisoccur,alloftheairorgas canbeevacuatedand replacedwithBSSanda smallerbubble left in the anterior chamber at the conclusion ofsurgery.This situationcanbebest avoidedby refilling theeyewithBSSpriortoplacingthefinalairorgasbubble.

Peripheral iridotomy

Pupillary block is a reported complication of all types ofendothelial keratoplasty.14,15 With DSEK surgery, pupillarydilation is often employed to prevent pupillary block.16However,withDMEKsurgery,pupillaryconstrictionisusedduringsurgerytopreventgraftdamage.Pupillaryconstric-tionincreasestheriskofpupillaryblockfromanairorgasbubbleintheanteriorchamber.AspupillarydilationisnotdesiredduringDMEKsurgery,itisofgreatimportancethattherecipienteyehasapatentperipheraliridotomy.Thiscanbeaccomplishedinmanyways.Theauthorsprefertocreatetheperipheral iridotomyas inferior andperipheralon the

migrate to cover areasof bare stroma.A small decrease inendothelialcelldensitymaybeasalienttradeifitisaccom-panied by a lower rate of graft detachment. Regardless ofthe planned area of resection, the authors recommend anopticalzonemarkerorcalipersbeusedtomarktheareaofresection.Thesemarksfacilitateprecisegraftcentrationafterunfolding.

AstableanteriorchamberfacilitatesstrippingoftheEDM.Thisstabilitycanbeaccomplishedwithacohesiveviscoelas-tic, air, or BSS using an anterior chamber maintainer. Theuseofviscoelasticaffordsthemoststableanteriorchamber,butrequiresextrasuppliesincludinganirrigationandaspi-ration unit. Some have raised concerns that viscoelasticdevicesmayimpededonorattachment.12However,acohe-siveviscoelasticfacilitatesgraspingandremovingtheEDMfromtherecipientstromalbed,canbeusedtopreventandcontrolbleeding,andcanalsoberemovedcompletelyfromtheanteriorchamber. Intheauthors’experience,usingairprovidesalessstableanteriorchamberbutimprovesvisual-izationofDMasitisscoredandremoved.Nomatterwhatmethodofsupportisused,ablunttippedinstrumentsuchas a reverse Sinskey hook is used to score a circle in therecipientEDM.Afterestablishingthisinitialbreak,thehostEDM tissue is pulled carefully in toward the center of theeyeandremovedthroughthemainincision.Asmentionedpreviously,greatcaremustbetakentoavoiddisturbingtheunderlying stroma, especially in cases of pseudophakicbullouskeratopathyinwhichthismaneuverismoredifficultcompared to Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. It is ofutmostimportancethatthecohesiveviscoelastic,ifused,isremovedinitsentiretypriortoinsertionofthegraft.

Pupillary modulation

After the recipient EDM is removed, attention is directedtoward pupillary modulation to prepare the eye for graftinsertion.A smallpupil is advantageous inDMEKsurgery.The iris serves to protect the graft from contact with theintraocular lens implant, which can damage the endothe-lium,or the crystalline lens inphakicDMEKcases,whichcan be damaged by intraocular maneuvers. Prior to graftinjection,acetylcholineisinjectedintotheanteriorchamber

Fig. 131.2  Host preparation for DMEK. Note the absence of overlap of graft and the host Descemet membrane. 

1- Limbus2- 1 mm paracentesis incisions3- Temporal incision to fit injector4- Well-centered DMEK graft (blue)5- Edge of desmetorrhexis6- Thin rim of bare stroma (orange)

2

43

21

6

5

ISBN:978-0-323-35757-9;PII:B978-0-323-35757-9.00131-X;Author:Mannis&Holland;00131

f0015

p0160

s9000

p0165

p0170

p0175

s0035

p0180

Mannis_7579_Chapter 131_main.indd 4 8/23/2016 4:34:27 PM

To protect the rights of the author(s) and publisher we inform you that this PDF is an uncorrected proof for internal business use only by the author(s), editor(s), reviewer(s), Elsevier and typesetter Toppan Best-set. It is not allowed to publish this proof online or in print. This proof copy is the copyright property of the publisher and is confidential until formal publication.

Page 6: Surgical Technique for DMEK - Mosby · Keratoplasty. Section 6. Endothelial Keratoplasty. Chapter . 131. Surgical Technique for DMEK. Kevin J. Shah, Michael D. Straiko, Mark A. Greiner.

131-5

CHAPTER 131

surgicalTechniqueforDMEK

with trypan blue 0.06% (VisionBlue, Dutch OphthalmicUSA,Exeter,NH)isessentialtoincreasecontrastandmaxi-mize visibility of the graft edges. The authors recommendbetween1and3minutesofgraftimmersionintrypanblueforadequatestaining.Whenthestainedgraftisloadedintoaninjector,adoubleorsinglescrollwillform.Incaseswithadoublescroll,orientationcanoftenbeconfirmedbydirectvisualinspectionandthegraftshouldbeinjectedwiththescrollsfacingup(e.g.facingtheposteriorstroma).Theori-entationofasinglescrollismoredifficulttoascertain,butcan be accomplished by observing the movement of theoverlappingareasofthescrollwhenrotatingthetip.Inthecorrectposition, theoverlappingedgesof thegraftwillbeonthetopofthescrollandwillappeartomoveinthesamedirectionasthetipisrotated(e.g.rotatingthetipclockwisewillresultinrightwardmovementoftheoverlappingarea).Ifthegraftisupsidedown,theoverlappingedgeswillmovein the opposite direction of the tip (e.g. rotating the tipclockwisewill result in leftwardmovementof theoverlap-pingarea).Afterrotatingthetiptopositionthegraftinthecorrect orientation, the tissue is injected into the anteriorchamber.Thisgraftorientationtechniquewasfirstdescribedby Peter Veldman, and named the “Veldman Venn” tech-nique. The overlapping DMEK graft edges are similar inappearancetoaVenndiagram(Fig.131.3).

Kruseetal.describedcreatingthreesemicircularmarksattheedgeofthegraftinanidentifiableorder.17Themarksarecreatedinsuccessionwithasmallroundpunchblade,butthedistancesbetweenthemarksvary.Theorderofthethreemarkschangeswhenlookingfromthecorrectedorientationversustheinvertedposition.Thelossofendothelialcellsinthe marked areas and the potential increase in peripheraldetachmentshaslimiteditsuse.

Recently, eyebankshavebegun toplaceanS-stamponthe stromal side of Descemet membrane when preparingDMEKtissue.SimilartotheorientationmarkingsmadeonthestromaonDSAEKgrafts, the stampprovidesdefinitivegraft orientation regardless of scroll characteristics. TheS-stampremainsvisiblefordaystoweeksafterbeingplacedat the eye bank. One concern is the loss of endothelialcells with this technique from the markings itself andthe additional manipulation required by the ophthalmic

patient’s iris as possible. This ensures that the peripheraliridotomy will be uncovered by gas when the patient sitsupright. A peripheral iridotomy can be created preopera-tivelywithaYAGlaser,butitiscriticaltopassaninstrumentthrough the PI intraoperatively to assure its patency. Aperipheral iridotomy may also be created at the time ofDMEK surgery. The authors prefer to bend the tip of a30-gaugeneedle,thenpassitthroughthepupilbehindtheiris,andscratchdownontopoftheneedlewithaSinskeyhooktoestablishanopening.Theopeningcanbestretchedusingabimanualtechniquetoassureitspatency.ForphakicDMEKcasesinwhichthismaneuvercannotbeperformed,aperipheraliridectomycanbecreatedusingafine-toothedforcepstograsptheperipheral iristhroughafairlyverticalparacentesis incision, and Vannas scissors to resect theperipheral iris tissue. It is important toensure that the iri-dectomyisfullthickness.Ariskofallintraoperativeperiph-eraliridotomytechniquesisbleeding.Techniquesthatuseacohesiveviscoelastictomaintaintheanteriorchambercanbeadvantageousinthissettingasthisdevicecanbeusedtotamponadeanybleedingthatmayoccurduringcreationoftheperipheraliridotomy(Video131.2).

Graft Orientation

Whenseparatedfromthestromalsurface,DMEKgraftstypi-cally scroll with the endothelial cell side facing outwards.Correctgraftorientationoccurswhenthecurlsofthescroll(s)face the posterior stroma. Achieving correct orientationbeforeunfoldingandinflatingtheanteriorchamberisvitalforsuccessfulDMEKsurgery.Dependingonthecharacteris-tics of the scroll and visibility through the host cornea,thistaskcanpresentseveralchallenges.Severaltechniqueshave been described to facilitate and confirm proper graftorientation.

Orientation before insertion

InjectingaDMEKgraftinthecorrectorientationisidealandshouldbeattemptedinallcases.Severalstepscanbetakento aid in confirming graft orientation prior to injection.Before loading into the desired injector, staining the graft

Fig. 131.3  Veldman Venn technique. The movement of the overlapping edges of a DMEK graft stained with trypan blue can be observed to determine orientation prior to insertion. 

Correct side up1

22

3

Up side down

2 2

1

ISBN:978-0-323-35757-9;PII:B978-0-323-35757-9.00131-X;Author:Mannis&Holland;00131

f0020

s0040

p0185

s0045

p0190

p0195

p0200

Mannis_7579_Chapter 131_main.indd 5 8/23/2016 4:34:27 PM

To protect the rights of the author(s) and publisher we inform you that this PDF is an uncorrected proof for internal business use only by the author(s), editor(s), reviewer(s), Elsevier and typesetter Toppan Best-set. It is not allowed to publish this proof online or in print. This proof copy is the copyright property of the publisher and is confidential until formal publication.

Page 7: Surgical Technique for DMEK - Mosby · Keratoplasty. Section 6. Endothelial Keratoplasty. Chapter . 131. Surgical Technique for DMEK. Kevin J. Shah, Michael D. Straiko, Mark A. Greiner.

131-6

PART ix KErATOplAsTy

Section 6 EndothelialKeratoplasty

rotatedaroundthelimbusandgentletappingofthecorneaisperformed.Theoperatingmicroscopelightisturneddownorcompletelyoff.Thedynamicsofthegraftisobservedandlightreflexesfromgraftfoldsandedgesprovideinformationto assess graft orientation. This technique is particularlyusefulinedematouscorneas.

Theuseof intraoperativeopticalcoherencetomography(iOCT) during DMEK surgery is increasing in popularity.23HandhelddevicesandintegratingtheOCTintotheopera-tivemicroscopehavebeendescribed.High-resolutionimagesfromiOCTprovideveryaccurateanddetailedinformationaboutgraftpositioning (Fig.131.5). Inaddition, iOCTcanbeusedtoevaluategraftattachmenttotheposteriorstroma.While the cost of iOCT is prohibitive inmost settings, itsaccuracy in ascertaining graft orientation and versatilityin obtaining real-time details about graft position andattachmentmakesitauniqueandusefuladjunctforDMEKsurgeons.

Changing orientation after insertion

Ifagraftisinvertedafterinsertion,severalstepscanbeusedtoflipthetissuebacktoitscorrectorientation.First,filltheanteriorchamberwithBSS.Thisdeepeningof theanteriorchamber will provide space for the graft to rotate. Next,move thegraft toward the centerof thepupilwithgentletapping (See Unscrolling and centering section). Finally,throughaparacentesis site,useaburstofBSStocreateaninternalfluidwave to rotate thegraft in thedesireddirec-tion.Forexample,ifthegraftisorientedonitssideakintothe letter “C”, aburstoffluid towards the superior aspectof the “C” will cause the superior edge to move in thedirectionof thefluidwaveandthegraftwill subsequentlyrotatecounterclockwise.While this techniquecanbeusedwiththegraftneartheangle,centeringthegraftanddeepen-ingtheanteriorchambercanfacilitatethistechnique.

Unscrolling and Centering

After achieving proper orientation of the DMEK graft, thesurgeoncanproceedwithasetofunfoldingandcenteringmaneuverstounscrollandpositionthegrafttissuewiththeendotheliumfacingtheiris,incorrectanatomicalconforma-tion.Justasobtainingthecorrectgraftorientationisessentialtopreventinggraftdetachment,unscrolling andcenteringthegraftusingprescribedtechniquesareessentialtomini-mize postoperative stromal edema due to endothelial celltraumatizationduringsurgery,graftdecentration,orboth.

Generally, unfolding of the graft is achieved with theassistanceofBSS,anairbubble,oradeliberatelyshallowedanteriorchamber.Allthreeapproachesmanipulatetheeffec-tiveforceoffluid(liquidorgas)withintheunscrolledgrafttissue, and result in theapplicationof forceperpendiculartotheDMsurfaceoftheunscrolledgrafttoopenupthegraftleaflets. This principle also governs the efficacy of cornealtapping and stroking maneuvers – external compressionforcesappliedtotheanteriorcornealsurfacewithacannula–thatvirtuallyallDMEKsurgeonsuseatsomepointduringsurgery toassistwithgraftunfolding.Eachapproachaimsto eliminate direct contact between the graft tissue andmetal instrumentation to minimize donor endothelial cell

technicians. A recent study conducted at the Devers EyeInstitute compared the rate of ECL in 19 patients whoreceivedDMEKtissuewiththeS-stampwith32patientswhoreceived a standard DMEK graft. At 6 months postopera-tively,equivalentratesofECLwerefoundinbothgroups.18The initial studies arepromising for its safetyandefficacycomparedtopreviousmethodsofascertaininggraftorienta-tion.UseoftheS-stampisincreasingamongsurgeonsandeyebanksthroughouttheUS.

Orientation after insertion

Whenthegraftisinjectedintotheanteriorchamber,graftorientation can change and can be difficult to assess. Anedematoushostcorneaorapoorlystainedgraftcanfurtherimpedevisualizinggraftorientation.

A technique using a cannula in the lumen of a doublescroll to confirm graft orientation has been described.19,20Whenthegraftisorientedcorrectlywiththescrollsfacingup, the tip of the cannula will appear blue when movedtowards the scroll edge because of the overlying stainedgraft. If the graft is positioned upside down (e.g. scrollsfacing down), the tip of the cannula will not changecolor when moved to the edge of the scroll. Coined theMoutsouris sign, this technique is useful, but can alsocausecelllosswithinadvertenttouchofthecannulatotheendothelium(Fig.131.4).

Severalno-touchtechniqueshavebeendescribedtodetectgraftorientation.Burkhartdescribedusingahandheld slitlamptoenhancevisualizationofthescrolls.21Whentheslitbeamisplacedoveracorrectlyorienteddoublescroll (e.g.scrollsfacingup),twoadjacentarcscanbeseen(twoscrolls)withadistantslitbeamconnectingthetwoarcs.Ifthegraftis inverted, only one continuous beam is noted. Agarwaletal.describedtheuseofanendoilluminatororlightprobetoaidingraftorientation.22Typicallyusedinretinalcases,a20-,23-,or25-gaugelightprobeisplacedobliquelyonthecorneal epithelium to enhance visualization. The probe is

Fig. 131.4  Moutouris sign. The instrument is placed on top of the graft and moved side to side. If it disappears under a scroll and looks blue (as in the picture above), correct graft orientation has been confirmed. (Courtesy of Mark A. Terry, MD.)

ISBN:978-0-323-35757-9;PII:B978-0-323-35757-9.00131-X;Author:Mannis&Holland;00131

f0025

s0050

p0205

p0210

p0215

p0220

s0055

p0225

s0060

p0230

p0235

Mannis_7579_Chapter 131_main.indd 6 8/23/2016 4:34:27 PM

To protect the rights of the author(s) and publisher we inform you that this PDF is an uncorrected proof for internal business use only by the author(s), editor(s), reviewer(s), Elsevier and typesetter Toppan Best-set. It is not allowed to publish this proof online or in print. This proof copy is the copyright property of the publisher and is confidential until formal publication.

Page 8: Surgical Technique for DMEK - Mosby · Keratoplasty. Section 6. Endothelial Keratoplasty. Chapter . 131. Surgical Technique for DMEK. Kevin J. Shah, Michael D. Straiko, Mark A. Greiner.

131-7

CHAPTER 131

surgicalTechniqueforDMEK

Güell etal. have described a systematic approach usingBSSfluidtounfoldthedonorgraft.24 Intheir technique,aGills cannula is connected to an automated irrigation-aspiration system (Constellation, Alcon Laboratories Inc.,FortWorth,Texas).Theinstrumenttipisintroducedthroughthemainincisionaftersuturingitclosed.Continuousirriga-tionissethighat60–100mmHg,buttheactualfluidpres-sure is much lower due to the small caliber of the Gillscannula.Low-pressureirrigationflowisusedbothtocenterthe graft scroll, and to unfold the leaflets. As describedabove,theinstrumenttipisplacedwithintheoverlappinggraft leaflets,and the irrigation isapplied fromwithin thescrolled graft to open the leaflets. As grafts from youngerdonorsaremoretightlyscrolledandunfoldinggenerallyismoredifficult in this setting,higherflowpressures canberequired.Thistechniquecanbecombinedwithinjectionofanairbubblewithinthescrollpriortocompleteunfolding,orwithgentlecannula-assistedcompressionoftheanteriorcornealsurfacewhilelow-flowirrigationisapplied.

damage. Additionally, a shallow chamber frequently ishelpful during the unfolding process, as reduced forceoutsidethegraft leafletswillencouragethegrafttounfoldand the reduced chamber area will help prevent the graftfromrescrolling.Thesebasicprinciplesprovideaconceptualfoundation for the various approaches to unfolding theDMEK graft practiced by surgeons at major DMEK centers(Fig.131.6).

Fluid assisted unscrolling

Short bursts of BSS from a 30-gauge cannula on a syringecanbeused toopen the graft scrolls.With the graft posi-tioned so a cannula tip can be placed within or aimed atthe edge of the scrolled graft, irrigation is applied to thescrolledportion(s)ofthegrafttounfolditsleaflets.Duringthisprocess, a shallowanterior chambercanbehelpful inkeepingthenewlyunfurlededgesof theDMEKgraft fromrescrolling.

Fig. 131.5  Intraoperative OCT. While the surgeon’s view is similar in both photos on the left, iOCT reveals that the graft in the top photo is upside down (scrolls down), while the bottom is in the correct orientation (scrolls up). 

A B

C D

ISBN:978-0-323-35757-9;PII:B978-0-323-35757-9.00131-X;Author:Mannis&Holland;00131

f0030

s0065

p0240

p0245

Mannis_7579_Chapter 131_main.indd 7 8/23/2016 4:34:28 PM

To protect the rights of the author(s) and publisher we inform you that this PDF is an uncorrected proof for internal business use only by the author(s), editor(s), reviewer(s), Elsevier and typesetter Toppan Best-set. It is not allowed to publish this proof online or in print. This proof copy is the copyright property of the publisher and is confidential until formal publication.

Page 9: Surgical Technique for DMEK - Mosby · Keratoplasty. Section 6. Endothelial Keratoplasty. Chapter . 131. Surgical Technique for DMEK. Kevin J. Shah, Michael D. Straiko, Mark A. Greiner.

131-8

PART ix KErATOplAsTy

Section 6 EndothelialKeratoplasty

thegrafttocontinuetobeunfoldedandmovedasneededforpropercentering.BSScanbeinjectedintotheinterfacebetweentheDescemetsurfaceofthegraftandtherecipientstroma, as needed, to help center and fully unscroll thedonortissue.Subsequently,acannulacanbeusedtostrokeor tap the anterior corneal surface to help unfolding thegraftedges.25Again,asnotedwithfluid-assistedmaneuvers,ashallowanteriorchamberduringbubble-assistedunscroll-ing is helpful in keeping the edges of DMEK graft fromrecurling.

Tightscrollscanpresentseveralchallengesandtheuseofaircanfacilitateatraumaticunscrollinginthesecases.Thetightscrollcanbepositionedsoacannulatipcanbeplaced

Bubble-assisted unscrolling

Small volumes of air from a 30-gauge cannula on a 1mLsyringecanalsobeusedtoopenthegraft.Althoughthiscanbe achieved in severalways, fundamentally, air is injectedeither above the graft or below the graft to facilitate itsunfolding. In the techniquedescribedbyPrice etal., aftertheedgesofthegraftarepartiallyunscrolledwithirrigatingjetsofBSS,asmallvolumeofaircanbeplacedunderneaththegraft,floatingitupwardsothattheDescemetsurfaceisapposed to the recipient stroma. An initial air bubble ofapproximately0.02mLorlessinjectedbeneaththegraftisusedtosecureitsorientation,yetissmallenoughtoallow

Fig. 131.6  Unfolding and centering a DMEK graft using corneal tapping assisted by a shallow anterior chamber. (A) The graft is positioned in proper orientation, with overlapping edges facing upward. (B, C) The graft is unfolded by tapping on the anterior corneal surface with a 30-gauge cannula. (D–G) The graft is centered, prior to complete unscrolling of the graft, by tapping on the limbus and/or peripheral cornea. (H) Additional corneal taps are used to unfurl the peripheral edges. (I) The DMEK graft is fully unscrolled and properly centered. (Courtesy of the University of Iowa.)

A B C

D E F

G H I

ISBN:978-0-323-35757-9;PII:B978-0-323-35757-9.00131-X;Author:Mannis&Holland;00131

f0035

s0070

p0250

p0255

Mannis_7579_Chapter 131_main.indd 8 8/23/2016 4:34:29 PM

To protect the rights of the author(s) and publisher we inform you that this PDF is an uncorrected proof for internal business use only by the author(s), editor(s), reviewer(s), Elsevier and typesetter Toppan Best-set. It is not allowed to publish this proof online or in print. This proof copy is the copyright property of the publisher and is confidential until formal publication.

Page 10: Surgical Technique for DMEK - Mosby · Keratoplasty. Section 6. Endothelial Keratoplasty. Chapter . 131. Surgical Technique for DMEK. Kevin J. Shah, Michael D. Straiko, Mark A. Greiner.

131-9

CHAPTER 131

surgicalTechniqueforDMEK

aspiratedfromtheparacentesisincisionsasoftenasneeded.Additionally, if needed, pressure can be applied at theequatorof theglobeusingadigitora larger-borecannulato displace the lens–iris diaphragm anteriorly and shallowthechamberfurther.

Centering and centration

Surgeonsmayneedtorecenterthegraftseveraltimespriorto injecting the final air bubble. This centration canbe accomplished whether the graft is fully or partiallyunscrolled,as longasa layeroffluid isbathingbothsidesof the graft. In the bubble-assisted techniques, BSS first isinjectedintotheanteriorchamber,eitherintotheinterfacebetween the recipient stroma and DM (if the bubble isbeneaththegraft)orbeneaththegraft tomake itfloatup(ifthebubbleisontopofthegraft).Reducingthevolumeoftheairbubblemayachievethesameeffect.Then,thegraftis repositionby tappingor strokinggentlyontheanteriorcorneal surface, the limbus, or the anterior sclera with acannula, tapping or swiping the graft toward the desiredlocation.Inaddition,slowlimbalindentationfollowedbyarapid release of the indentation can be very effective inmoving a graft towards the direction of the cannula. Forexample, ifagraft isnasallydisplaced, indenting the tem-porallimbuswilldeepenthechambernasally.Aquickreleaseof this indentation will result in an internal fluid wavetraveling temporally that will reposition the graft in thedesired temporal direction. As noted above, a shallowchamberwillaccentuatetheeffectofexternalcompressionforcesandresult ingreatergraftmovementcomparedtoadeepanteriorchamber.

Itisidealforthefinalgraftpositiontobecenteredwithinthe area of stripped DM on the recipient cornea. Tourtasetal.haveshownthattheabsenceofoverlapbetweentheDMEK graft and host Descemet membrane correlates withreduced edge detachments and lower rebubble rates.27Regardlessofthesurgeon’sstrategyforsizingthegraftandperforming the descemetorhexis, it may be of particularimportancetominimizeedgeoverlapattheinferiorquad-rant,asthisedgeisleastprotectedbyairorgastamponadeintheearlypostoperativeperiod.Conversely,gapsofuncov-eredrecipientstromabetweenaslightlydecenteredgraftandhostDMaremoreacceptable.Suchgapswillresultinstromaledema that will generally subside, as donor endotheliumand/orrecipientendothelialcellsmigratetorepopulatetheuncoveredstroma.28Aslongasthecentralcorneaiscovered,slightdecentrationofaDMEKgraftdoesnotseemtoimpactthefinalvisualoutcome.

Graft Tamponade With Air or Sulfur Hexafluoride 20%

Immediately after unscrolling and positioning the DMEKgraft,abubbleofairorsulfurhexafluoride20%isplacedintheanteriorchamber.Thepurposeofthebubbleistomain-tainappositionofthegrafttissuewiththeposteriorstromaofthehost,whilethepumpfunctionrecoversandthegraftcanmaintainitsadherenceinaqueoushumor.Avarietyoftechnicalconsiderationstoavoidcomplicationsofairorgas

within the lumen of the scrolled DMEK graft. A small airbubble is then delivered within the scroll(s) such that thebubblewillbeontopof theDescemetsurfaceof thegraftduringtheunscrollingprocess.20Alternately,aslongasthegraftispositionedwiththescroll(s)facingupward,asmallairbubblecanbeplacedontopofthegrafttissue,sothatwith external applicationof a cannula itbecomes trappedwiththescrolledgraft.External tapsareusedtobegintheunscrollingprocess.Then, external strokeson theanteriorcornealsurfaceareusedtodirectthebubbletounfoldthegraft.AsthebubbleispushedalongtheDMtowardacurlededge of the graft, that edge becomes unscrolled. The airbubbleisenlargedsubsequentlyasneededtohelpfacilitategraftunscrolling,untilthecentralendotheliumoftheDMEKgraft is flattened over the iris surface. Once unscrolling iscomplete,thebubbleontopofthegraft isevacuated,andthegraftcanberecenteredasneededusingcornealtapsontheperipheral cornea, limbus,oranterior sclera ifneeded.Ofnote,asdescribedbyKruse,anairbubblecanbepreloadedin the scrolledDMEKgraft and the tissue is then injectedwiththe“bubbleintheroll”tofacilitateunscrolling.

Intheeventasmalledgeisnotunfoldedcompletely, itispossibletoutilizeanairbubbleequaltoorsmallerthanthe graft diameter to maintain the graft’s position whileunfoldingthecurledgraftedge.Termed“bubblebumping,”the folded edge is submerged in BSS, while the anteriorcorneal surfaceoverlying the foldededge is tappedwithacannula.25Graspingthelimbuswitha0.12forcepsandrotat-ingtheeyetowardtheunscrollededge,toensureitscompletesubmersioninfluid,canbehelpful.

Chamber assisted unscrolling

TappingontheanteriorcorneaofaneyewithaveryshallowanteriorchambercanalsobeusedtoopentheDMEKgraft.NeitherirrigationwithBSSnorinjectionsofairareusedtoassist with unfolding the graft in this technique, firstdescribed by Yoeruek etal.26 After confirming the graft’sorientation and releasing aqueous from the paracentesisincisions,a30-gaugecannulaisusedtotapontheanteriorcornealsurfacetounfoldthegraft.Whetherthegraftleafletsare overlapping (single scroll) or nonoverlapping (doublescroll),typicallytheinitialcornealtapsareappliedcentrallywiththelongaxisofthecannulaparalleltothelongaxisofthe graft. Corneal tapping increases the pressure of fluidtrappedwithintheunscrolledgrafttissue,andredirectsthefluidforceperpendiculartotheDescemetsurfacewithintheunscrolled leaflet(s) to open them. Once one leaflet isopened, a bimanual technique can be used, wherein onecannula applies pressure over the unscrolled graft andanothercannulaisusedtotaptheanteriorcorneatounfoldthecurledgraftedge.Inordertorecenterthegraft(whetherfully or partially unfolded) during the process, a 30-gaugecannula isused to tap the limbusor stroke theperipheralcornea,usuallytowardthedesiredlocation.Externalmaneu-vershavegreatereffect,andresultingreatergraftmovement,inashallowchamberthanafullyformedchamber.

This chamber assisted unscrolling technique requiresthattheanteriorchamberissufficientlyshallowtopreventrescrolling of the tissue. In order to maintain a shallowchamberduringtheunscrollingprocess,fluidisreleasedor

ISBN:978-0-323-35757-9;PII:B978-0-323-35757-9.00131-X;Author:Mannis&Holland;00131

p0260

s0075

p0265

p0270

s9005

p0275

p0280

s0080

p0285

Mannis_7579_Chapter 131_main.indd 9 8/23/2016 4:34:29 PM

To protect the rights of the author(s) and publisher we inform you that this PDF is an uncorrected proof for internal business use only by the author(s), editor(s), reviewer(s), Elsevier and typesetter Toppan Best-set. It is not allowed to publish this proof online or in print. This proof copy is the copyright property of the publisher and is confidential until formal publication.

Page 11: Surgical Technique for DMEK - Mosby · Keratoplasty. Section 6. Endothelial Keratoplasty. Chapter . 131. Surgical Technique for DMEK. Kevin J. Shah, Michael D. Straiko, Mark A. Greiner.

131-10

PART ix KErATOplAsTy

Section 6 EndothelialKeratoplasty

encompassestheperipheraliridotomyattheendofsurgery.This will ensure free communication of fluid across theperipheral iris. The surgeon should also attend to the cre-ationofasufficientlylargeiridotomytomaintainpatency;stretching the peripheral iris with blunt instruments suchas Sinskey and/or reverse Sinskey hooks can be helpful.Somesurgeonswillutilizetopicaldilatingdrops(phenyleph-rine2.5%andcyclopentolate1%)intraoperatively,typicallyafter the graft is unscrolled and centered, to dilate thepupilandminimizetheriskofdevelopingpupillaryblock.Additionally, some surgeons perform a gas-fluid exchangeaftertheinitialperiodoftamponade,priortoplacementofthefinalbubble, toensurenoairorgas is trappedbehindtheiris.

DMEK detachment

Graft detachment is the most frequent complication ofDMEK and remains a challenge for surgeons performingandconsideringadoptionofthissurgicaltechnique.ReportsfromsurgeonsearlyintheirsurgicalexperiencewithDMEKindicate there is ahigh rateof graftdislocations requiringreinjectionofairtosupportthegraft(a“rebubble”procedure),rangingfrom20%to82%.29–32Assurgeonsgainexperiencethegraftdetachmentdrops,rangingfrom4.4%to14%afterpassageofa“learningcurve”period.30,33,34Thiscomplicationhas prompted surgeons to make additional modificationsto initial graft tamponade strategies. For example,Dapena

tamponade, chiefly pupillary block, are employed duringandsometimesbeforesurgery.

Toinstilltheairorgasbubbleoncethegraftisunscrolled,thesurgeonslidesasmallborecannulaorneedle(typically30-gauge)alongtheanterioririsbeneaththegrafttissue.Thechamber volume typically is low at this point. Once thecannula tip is centered beneath the graft in the pupillaryaxis, the surgeon inflates theanterior chamber.The initialbubble can be small or large, depending on the surgeon’sneeds.Ultimately,oncethegraftispositioned,thebubbleisenlargedtooccupynearlytheentireanteriorchamber(Fig.131.7).Somesurgeonswillinsufflatethechambertoahigherintraocular pressure and use a second instrument to com-press thecorneaexternallyandevacuateanyfluidtrappedbetween the thin DMEK graft and the recipient cornealstroma. After a period of time, typically 10 minutes, thebubbleisreducedto80–90%oftheanteriorchambervolumesothatitencompassestheentiregraft.

The primary complication of air or gas tamponade ispupillaryblock.Pupillaryblockcanoccurwhentheanteriorchamberisoverfilledwithairorgasandcausesimpedanceofaqueousflowfromtheposteriorchamberacrossthepupil-larymarginandintotheanteriorchamber.Topreventthispotentiallyblindingcomplication,aperipheraliridotomyinthe inferior iris is created prior to insertion of the graft,eitherintraoperativelyorpreoperatively(seesectiononhostpreparation).Careshouldbetakentoensurethatacuffofaqueousispresent intheperipheralanteriorchamberthat

Fig. 131.7  Graft tamponade with air or sulfur hexafluoride 20%. After the 30-G cannula tip is centered beneath the graft, a slow, controlled inflation of the anterior chamber is performed. Rapid inflation or inflating prior to centering the cannula tip can move and dislodge the graft. (Courtesy of the University of Iowa.)

A B C

D E F

ISBN:978-0-323-35757-9;PII:B978-0-323-35757-9.00131-X;Author:Mannis&Holland;00131

f0040

p0290

p0295

s0085

p0300

Mannis_7579_Chapter 131_main.indd 10 8/23/2016 4:34:30 PM

To protect the rights of the author(s) and publisher we inform you that this PDF is an uncorrected proof for internal business use only by the author(s), editor(s), reviewer(s), Elsevier and typesetter Toppan Best-set. It is not allowed to publish this proof online or in print. This proof copy is the copyright property of the publisher and is confidential until formal publication.

Page 12: Surgical Technique for DMEK - Mosby · Keratoplasty. Section 6. Endothelial Keratoplasty. Chapter . 131. Surgical Technique for DMEK. Kevin J. Shah, Michael D. Straiko, Mark A. Greiner.

131-11

CHAPTER 131

surgicalTechniqueforDMEK

especially inthesuperiorcornealendothelium.Thatstudycould not control for positioning, and unlike in humans,both air and SF6 exposed groups demonstrated substantialintraocularinflammationbeginningonday1.48Takenalto-gether,theliteraturesuggeststhatSF6appearstobeastoxictothecornealendotheliumasair,andthatsequestrationofthe corneal endothelium from nutrients in aqueous likelycontributestocelldamageandcellloss.47Repositioningandnormal patient movement should help ensure that thecorneal endothelium is exposed to aqueous and mitigatepossibledamage.

Positioningstrategiestomaintainsupportoftheairorgastamponadeinthepostoperativeperiodvarysubstantially.Acommonpracticeisforthepatienttobeinstructedtomain-tainasupinepositionfor45to60minutesaftersurgeryinthe postoperative unit. Some surgeons will recheck thepatientatthattimetoensureappropriateintraocularpres-sure and perform an air-fluid exchange routinely or asneeded.49,50 The authors currently keep the patient’s eyeshielded and do not examine the patient until the firstpostoperative visit the following day. Patients are ofteninstructed to maintain supine positioning for some timepostoperatively,rangingfromaslittleas24hourspostopera-tivelytoasmuchasevery2hoursforupto1weekpostop-eratively, with practices again varying from surgeon tosurgeon. The postoperative positioning regimen describedbyGüell–inwhichpatientsareaskedtopositiontheirheadinvariouspositionsfor15minuteintervalswhileawakeforthefirstweekpostoperatively–demonstratestheconceptofusing the bubble to tamponade the entirety of the graftsurface.51 While the bubble is still present in the anteriorchamber,shouldanedgeliftpresent,thepatient’sheadcanbepositionedsuchthatthebubblecanbedirectedtowardtheareaof concern (e.g.with theheadhangingbackwardslightlytotamponadeaninferioredgelift).

References1. KimEC,BonfadiniG,ToddL,etal. Simple, inexpensive,andeffective

injectorforDescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplasty.Cornea2014;33(6):649–52.

2. Kruse FE, Laaser K, Cursiefen C, etal. A stepwise approach to donorpreparation and insertion increases safety and outcome of Descemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplasty.Cornea2011;30(5):580–7.

3. GorovoyIR,GorovoyMS.Descemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplastypostoperative year 1 endothelial cell counts. Am J Ophthalmol 2015;159(3):597–600,e592.

4. Price MO, Price FW Jr. Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplastysurgery: update on the evidence and hurdles to acceptance. Curr Opin Ophthalmol2013;24(4):329–35.

5. Nieuwendaal CP, Lapid-Gortzak R, van der Meulen IJ, etal. Posteriorlamellar keratoplasty using descemetorhexis and organ-cultured donorcornealtissue(Mellestechnique).Cornea2006;25(8):933–6.

6. FengMT,PriceMO,PriceFWJr.UpdateonDescemetmembraneendo-thelialkeratoplasty(DMEK).Int Ophthalmol Clin2013;53(2):31–45.

7. Dapena I, Moutsouris K, Droutsas K, etal. Standardized “no-touch”technique forDescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplasty.Arch Oph-thalmol2011;129(1):88–94.

8. Arnalich-MontielF,Munoz-NegreteFJ,DeMiguelMP.Doubleportinjec-tor device to reduce endothelial damage in DMEK. Eye (Lond) 2014;28(6):748–51.

9. HamL,vanLuijkC,DapenaI,etal.EndothelialcelldensityafterDes-cemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplasty:1-to2-yearfollow-up.Am J Ophthalmol2009;148(4):521–7.

10. KruseFE,SchrehardtUS,TourtasT.OptimizingoutcomeswithDescemet’smembrane endothelial keratoplasty. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2014;25(4):325–34.

etal. attribute their reducedgraftdislocation rate, inpart,to an increase in the duration of complete air fill postop-eratively, from 30 minutes to 45–60 minutes.30 However,it is important to note that the centers most experiencedwithDMEKhaveusedroomairasthetamponadeagent.Inorder to reduce the risk of graft detachment and need forrebubbleprocedures,othercentershaveadoptedtheuseofsulfurhexafluoride(SF6)ata20%concentration,ratherthanroomair, to increase thedurationof thebubble andgrafttamponadeintheearlypostoperativeperiod.DetachmentsafterDMEKtendtostartwithliftingofagraftedge–oftentheinferioredge–andcanbeobservedasearlyasthefirstpostoperativeday.Becauseedgeliftscanprogressoverdaystoweeks toa completedislocationof thegraft, increasingthe duration of the anterior chamber bubble in the earlypostoperativeperiodisadvantageous.

Longer lastinggaseshavebeenattractivealternatives toairtosupportandachievetissuetamponade.SF6,firstsyn-thesizedin1902,isaninert,inorganic,water-insolublegasfirstdescribedintheophthalmicliteratureforuseinretinaldetachmentrepairbyNortonin1973.35Itisusedroutinelyinmodernretinaldetachmentandmacularholesurgeries.36Vitreoretinal surgeons successfully utilize SF6 at a non-expansileconcentrationof20%,37whicheffectivelydoublestheperiodofpostoperative tamponadecomparedtoair invitreoretinal surgery.38 SF6 was first described for use inanteriorsegmentsurgeryin1987,intherepairofDescemetdetachments after cataract surgery, and has since beenreportedonextensivelyforthis indication.39,40SF6hasalsobeendescribedforthetreatmentofacutehydropsinkera-toconus as well as complex DSAEK surgery. Most recently,Güelletal.havereportedontheuseofSF620%fortheinitialgrafttamponadeintheirinitialseriesof15casesofDMEK.Theyreportgoodresultantcornealclarity,meanECLcom-parabletoothergroups,andrateofrebubbleof6.6%.24TheauthorsroutinelyuseSF620%astheinitialagenttoachievegraft tamponade,withsimilar resultsas reportedbyGüell.Whentheanteriorchamberisfilledto80–90%,anairbubblelastsapproximately3–5days,whileaSF620%bubble lastsapproximately 6–10 days. It is vital that a concentrationgreaterthan20%isnotusedasthiswillresultinanexpansilegasthatcanleadtopupillaryblockdespiteplacementofaperipheraliridotomy.

SF6hasbeenshowntobenontoxicbyinhalationinrats,mice,guineapigs,rabbits,andhumans,andnontoxicintheintraperitoneal cavity of humans.41–43 Clinically and histo-logically, the effects of air and sulfur hexafluoride on thecorneal endothelium have been under investigation sincethe1970s.HistologicalanalysesofcornealendotheliuminrabbitandcatmodelshavedemonstratedthatbothairandSF6causeultrastructuraldamageandECL.44,45 InVanHornetal.’s landmark investigation of the in vivo effects of airandsulfurhexafluorideonrabbitcornealendothelium,bothair and SF6 were shown to cause proliferation of rabbitendothelium.SF6didnotappeartohaveanyspecifictoxiceffect on the corneal endothelium when compared withair.46Theseresultsappeartobeasvalid inacatmodel–aspecies,likehumans,withoutregenerativeendothelium–asshownbyFoulks.47Ofnote,inanupdatedinvestigationoftheeffectsofSF620%comparedtoair incats,greaterECLwasnotedinthegroupexposedtoSF620%comparedtoair,

ISBN:978-0-323-35757-9;PII:B978-0-323-35757-9.00131-X;Author:Mannis&Holland;00131

p0305

p0310

p0315

Mannis_7579_Chapter 131_main.indd 11 8/23/2016 4:34:30 PM

To protect the rights of the author(s) and publisher we inform you that this PDF is an uncorrected proof for internal business use only by the author(s), editor(s), reviewer(s), Elsevier and typesetter Toppan Best-set. It is not allowed to publish this proof online or in print. This proof copy is the copyright property of the publisher and is confidential until formal publication.

Page 13: Surgical Technique for DMEK - Mosby · Keratoplasty. Section 6. Endothelial Keratoplasty. Chapter . 131. Surgical Technique for DMEK. Kevin J. Shah, Michael D. Straiko, Mark A. Greiner.

131-12

PART ix KErATOplAsTy

Section 6 EndothelialKeratoplasty

29. HamL,Dapena I, vanLuijkC, etal.Descemetmembrane endothelialkeratoplasty(DMEK)forFuchsendothelialdystrophy:reviewofthefirst50consecutivecases.Eye (Lond)2009;23:1990–8.

30. DapenaI,HamL,DroutsasK,etal.LearningcurveinDescemet’smem-brane endothelial keratoplasty: first series of 135 consecutive cases.Ophthalmology2011;118:2147–54.

31. PriceMO,GiebelAW,FairchildKM,etal.Descemetmembraneendothe-lial keratoplasty:prospectivemulticenter studyofvisual and refractiveoutcomesandendothelialsurvival.Ophthalmology2009;116:2361–8.

32. TourtasT,LaaserK,BachmannBO,etal.Descemet’smembraneendothe-lialkeratoplastyversusDescemetstrippingautomatedendothelilkerato-plasty.Am J Ophthalmol2012;153:1082–467.

33. Dirisamer M, Ham L, Dapena I, etal. Efficacy of Descemet membraneendothelialkeratoplasty;clinicaloutcomeof200consecutivecasesafteralearningcurveof25cases.Arch Ophthalmol2011;129:1435–43.

34. FengMT,PriceMO,PriceFW.UpdateonDescemetmembraneendothe-lialkeratoplasty(DMEK).Int Ophthalmol Clin2013;53:31–45.

35. Norton EWD. Intraocular gas in the management of selected retinaldetachments.Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol1973;77:OP85–98.

36. Km SS, Smiddy WE, Feuer WJ, etal. Outcomes of sulfur hexafluoride(SF6) versus perfluropropane (C3F8) gas tamponade for macular holesurgery.Retina2008;28:1408–15.

37. AbramsGW,EdelhauserHF,AabergTM,etal.Dynamicsof intravitrealsulfurhexafluoridegas.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci1974;13(11):863–8.

38. ThompsonJT.Kineticsofintraoculargases.Disappearanceofair,sulfurhexafluoride, and perfluoropropane after pars plana vitrectomy. Arch Ophthalmol1989;107(5):687–91.

39. Gault JA, Raber IM. Repair of Descemet’s membrane detachment withintracameralinjectionof20%sulfurhexafluoridegas.Cornea1996;15(5):483–9.

40. ZusmanNB,WaringGO,NajarianLV,etal.Sulfurhexafluoridegasintherepairofintractabledescemet’smembranedetachment.Am J Ophthalmol1987;104:660.

41. GreenbergLA,LesterD.Thetoxicityofsulfurhexafluoride.Arch Ind Hyg Occup Med1950;2:348–9.

42. SwalbachWS,SchwarzSI,RhanW,etal.Useofanewgas,sulfurhexa-flouride,SF6,inpneumoperitoneum.Am Rev Tuberc1957;76:1063–70.

43. Specht H, Brubach HF. Inhalation of sulfar hexafluoride. Science 1951;114(2973):662–3.

44. Leibowitz H, Laing R. Corneal endothelium: The effect of air in theanteriorchamber.Arch Ophthalmol1974;92(3):227–30.

45. OlsenRJ.Airandthecornealendothelium:aninvivospecularmicroscopystudyincats.Arch Ophthalmol1980;98(7):1283–4.

46. VanHornDL,EdelhauserHF,AabergTM,etal.Invivoeffectsofairandsulfurhexafluoridegasonrabbitcornealendothelium.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci1972;11:1028–36.

47. Foulks GN, de Juan E, Hatchell DN, etal. The effect of perfluoropro-pane on the cornea in rabbits and cats. Arch Ophthalmol 1987;105:256–9.

48. LandryH,AminianA,HoffartL,etal.CornealendothelialtoxicityofairandSF6.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci2011;52(5):2279–86.

49. DirisamerM,vanDijkK,DapenaI,etal.Preventionandmanagementof graft detachment in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.Arch Ophthalmol2012;130(3):280–91.

50. GuerraFP,AnshuA,PriceMO,etal.Descemet’smembraneendothelialkeratoplasty:prospectivestudyof1-yearvisualoutcomes,graftsurvival,andendothelialcellloss.Ophthalmology2011;118(12):2368–73.

51. GüellJL,MorralM,GrisO,etal.Bimanualtechniqueforinsertionandpositioning of endothelium–Descemet membrane graft in Descemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplasty.Cornea2013;32(12):1521–6.

11. Jacobi C, Zhivov A, Korbmacher J, etal. Evidence of endothelial cellmigration after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol2011;152(4):537–42,e532.

12. Nieuwendaal CP, Lapid-Gortzak R, van der Meulen IJ, etal. Posteriorlamellar keratoplasty using descemetorhexis and organ-cultured donorcornealtissue(Mellestechnique).Cornea2006;25(8):933–6.

13. Ham L, Dapena I, Moutsouris K, etal. Refractive change and stabilityafter Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Effect of cornealdehydration-inducedhyperopicshiftonintraocularlenspowercalcula-tion.J Cataract Refract Surg2011;37(8):1455–64.

14. MaierAK,GundlachE,GonnermannJ,etal.Retrospectivecontralateralstudy comparing Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty withDescemetstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplasty.Eye (Lond)2015;29(3):327–32.

15. SuhLH,YooSH,DeobhaktaA,etal.ComplicationsofDescemet’sstrip-pingwithautomatedendothelialkeratoplasty:surveyof118eyesatoneInstitute.Ophthalmology2008;115(9):1517–24.

16. TerryMA,ShamieN,ChenES,etal.Endothelialkeratoplastyasimplifiedtechnique to minimize graft dislocation, iatrogenic graft failure, andpupillaryblock.Ophthalmology2008;115(7):1179–86.

17. Bachmann BO, Laaser K, Kruse FE, etal. A method to confirm correctorientationofDescemetmembraneduringDescemetmembraneendo-thelialkeratoplasty.Am J Ophthalmol2010;149:922–5.

18. VeldmanPB,MaykoZ,StraikoMD,etal.Descemetmembraneendothe-lialkeratoplasty:earlycomplicationsand6-monthendothelialcell lossinacomparativeseriesofunstampedandstromalsidedS-stampedtissuein 101 consecutive cases. Paper presented at: AAO Annual Meeting;October19,2014;Chicago,IL.

19. Liarakos VS, Dapena I, Melles GRJ, etal. Intraocular graft unfoldingtechniques in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. JAMA Ophthalmol2013;131:29–35.

20. Dapena I, Moutsouris K, Melles GR, etal. Standardized “no-touch”technique forDescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplasty.Arch Oph-thalmol2011;129(1):88–94.

21. BurkhartZN,FengMT,PriceFW,etal.HandheldslitbeamtechniquestofacilitateDMEKandDALK.Cornea2013;32:722–4.

22. JacobS,AgarwalA,AgarwalA,etal.Endoilluminator-assistedtranscor-neal illumination for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty:enhancedintraoperativevisualizationofthegraftincornealdecompen-sationsecondarytopseudophakicbullouskeratopathy.J Cataract Refract Surg2014;40(8):1332–6.

23. StevenP,LeBlancC,VeltenK, etal.OptimizingDescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplastyusing intraoperativeoptical coherence tomog-raphy.JAMA Ophthalmol2013;131:1135–42.

24. GüellJL,MorralM,GrisO,etal.Bimanualtechniqueforinsertionandpositioning of endothelium-Descemet membrane graft in Descemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplasty.Cornea2013;32(12):1521–6.

25. Price MO, Giebel AW, Price FW Jr, etal. Descemet’s membrane endo-thelialkeratoplasty:prospectivemulticenter studyofvisualandrefrac-tive outcomes and endothelial survival. Ophthalmology 2009;116(12):2361–8.

26. Yoeruek E, Bayyoud T, Hofmann J, etal. Novel maneuver facilitatingDescemet membrane unfolding in the anterior chamber. Cornea 2013;32(3):370–3.

27. Tourtas T, Schlomberg J, Kruse FE, etal. Graft adhesion in Descemetmembrane endothelial keratoplasty dependent on size of removal ofhost’sdescemetmembrane.JAMA Ophthalmol2014;132(2):155–61.

28. JacobiC,ZhivovA,KruseFE,etal.Evidenceofendothelialcellmigrationafter Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol2011;152(4):537–42.

ISBN:978-0-323-35757-9;PII:B978-0-323-35757-9.00131-X;Author:Mannis&Holland;00131

Mannis_7579_Chapter 131_main.indd 12 8/23/2016 4:34:30 PM

To protect the rights of the author(s) and publisher we inform you that this PDF is an uncorrected proof for internal business use only by the author(s), editor(s), reviewer(s), Elsevier and typesetter Toppan Best-set. It is not allowed to publish this proof online or in print. This proof copy is the copyright property of the publisher and is confidential until formal publication.