STANFORD FORUM ON JUVENILE STANFORD FORUM ON JUVENILE JUSTICE REFORM JUSTICE REFORM Not your father’s youth authority… Not your father’s youth authority… For example: 71% of youth in DJJ institutions last November were committed for violent offenses 43% used a weapon during their commitment offense 71% of the boys, and 63% of the girls, were 18 or older 86% were minority; half Hispanic The California Department of The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation - Corrections and Rehabilitation - Division of Juvenile Justice Division of Juvenile Justice
STANFORD FORUM ON JUVENILE JUSTICE REFORM. Not your father’s youth authority…. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation - Division of Juvenile Justice. For example:. 71% of youth in DJJ institutions last November were committed for violent offenses. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
STANFORD FORUM ON STANFORD FORUM ON JUVENILE JUSTICE JUVENILE JUSTICE
REFORMREFORM
Not your father’s youth authority…Not your father’s youth authority…
For example:
71% of youth in DJJ institutions last November were committed for violent offenses
43% used a weapon during their commitment offense
71% of the boys, and 63% of the girls, were 18 or older
86% were minority; half Hispanic
The California Department of The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation - Division Corrections and Rehabilitation - Division
of Juvenile Justiceof Juvenile Justice
Most DJJ facilities were built decades ago for Most DJJ facilities were built decades ago for a population that no longer existsa population that no longer exists
Primary Offense on First CommitmentPercent of Admissions: 1960-2004
The increase in violent offenses has been The increase in violent offenses has been accompanied by an increase in the average accompanied by an increase in the average length of staylength of stay
Average Length of Stay (months) 1986 - 2005
18.821.5
26.5 25.6 26.1 27.125.6
24.2 25.026.8 27.5
29.8
33.936.2 35.8
37.5 38.135.8 34.7
36.3
13.7 14.4 13.6 14.1 13.6 13.4 12.810.8
9.07.6
22.124.2
26.227.5 27.8 28.8 29.2
26.3 25.5
22.8
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
19
86
19
87
19
88
19
89
19
90
19
91
19
92
19
93
19
94
19
95
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
Initial CommittmentParole Violators
All Youth
Source: Planning team analysis of data provided by CDCR Office of Research
Unusual features of the California Unusual features of the California Juvenile Justice systemJuvenile Justice system
California has the longest extended age for juvenile court California has the longest extended age for juvenile court jurisdiction (age 24) in the nation. Only 6 states extend jurisdiction (age 24) in the nation. Only 6 states extend jurisdiction beyond the age of 20jurisdiction beyond the age of 20
California is one of 6 states where length of stay is based California is one of 6 states where length of stay is based on an indeterminate commitment with a maximumon an indeterminate commitment with a maximum
California is one of 11 states which have the juvenile California is one of 11 states which have the juvenile authority within an adult corrections agencyauthority within an adult corrections agency
California is one of 7 states with a juvenile parole boardCalifornia is one of 7 states with a juvenile parole board
As part of the Farrell lawsuit, the parties As part of the Farrell lawsuit, the parties visited various states identified as exemplaryvisited various states identified as exemplary
We made a few comparisons of California to these states …
Compared to these states, California houses Compared to these states, California houses a low percentage of committed youth in its a low percentage of committed youth in its state facilitiesstate facilities
Percent of Committed Youth in State or State Contracted Facilities - Selected States 2003
36.2%
55.1% 59.7%69.7% 74.4% 78.1% 80.8%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
California Florida UnitedStates
Colorado * Washington Texas Missouri
* 36% of Colorado’s committed youth are excluded from this analysis due to data limitations
Source: OJJDP Census of Juveniles in Residential Placements, 2003
The state “incarceration rate” for youth in The state “incarceration rate” for youth in California is the lowest among the California is the lowest among the comparison statescomparison states
Committed Youth in State or State Contracted Facilities per 1,000 Youth Age 12 to 17 - Selected States 2003
1.251.43 1.60 1.68 1.73
2.242.51
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
California Colorado * United States Washington Missouri Texas Florida
* 36% of Colorado’s committed youth are excluded from this analysis due to data limitations
Source: OJJDP Census of Juveniles in Residential Placements, 2003
Why do DJJ institutions Why do DJJ institutions cost so much?cost so much?
DJJ institutions cost more than DJJ institutions cost more than $120,000 per youth in FY 05-06$120,000 per youth in FY 05-06
Total for institutionsTotal for institutions $373,247,000$373,247,000
Average daily population for 2005Average daily population for 2005 3,100 3,100
Cost per bed per yearCost per bed per year $ 120,402$ 120,402
* Source: Governor’s Budget, Budget Year 2006/07* Source: Governor’s Budget, Budget Year 2006/07
Other states cost far lessOther states cost far less
The five comparison states that The five comparison states that were visited generally cost less were visited generally cost less than half of DJJ costs.than half of DJJ costs.
Missouri $57,170
Washington * $68,564
Florida $57,998
Texas $56,582
Colorado (waiting for data)
* Washington costs do not include education
How can this be?How can this be?The analysis in not complete but preliminary The analysis in not complete but preliminary findings findings (subject to refinement)(subject to refinement) show that: show that:
In Washington State, the average salary for the position equivalent to a Youth Correctional Officer (YCO) is 55% of that earned by a typical YCO in California.
Adjusting for wage differences, the same program in California would cost about $113,000 per youth per year – a figure which does not include educational costs.
The average for the position equivalent to a Youth Correctional Counselor (YCC) is 67% of a YCC in California.
Cost comparison continuedCost comparison continued
In Missouri, the average salary for the position equivalent to a Youth Correctional Counselor is 41% of that earned by a typical YCC in California. (Missouri does not employ Youth Correctional Officers.)
Adjusting for wage differences, the same program in California would cost about $141,000 per youth per year. (This calculation also subject to refinement.)
How can cost be so high?How can cost be so high?
While additional work is needed, it appears that the While additional work is needed, it appears that the primary reason is that California pays youth correctional primary reason is that California pays youth correctional officers and counselors much more than other states.officers and counselors much more than other states.
Additional analysis (e.g. staffing levels) may explain Additional analysis (e.g. staffing levels) may explain other cost differences.other cost differences.
This does not explain why outcomes in California – This does not explain why outcomes in California – such as parole revocations and recidivism - fail to such as parole revocations and recidivism - fail to measure up to those in the exemplary comparison measure up to those in the exemplary comparison states.states.