Top Banner
Year 1 Artech Information Systems CGI Technologies and Solutions Inc. CMA Consulting Services. Computer Aid Inc. Experis US Inc. GCom Software Inc. Genesys Consulting Services Inc. IIT Inc. Infopeople Corporation Knowledge Builders Inc. Logic House Ltd. Logic Technology Inc. MVP Consulting Plus Inc. NTT Data Inc. Precision Task Group Inc. PSI International Inc. System Edge (US) LLC Tempositions Inc. d/b/a Compuforce Universal Technologies LLC US Tech Solutio SCORE Cumulative Score: YES NO 70 67 73 64 61 76 76 85 61 67 82 61 73 91 73 73 64 67 55 61 # of Valid Candidate Response Forms Submitted 713 81 274 243 234 668 389 824 394 419 784 22 437 783 205 399 50 303 307 515 Contractor Responsiveness Rate: 74.58% 8.47% 28.66% 25.42% 24.48% 69.87% 40.69% 86.19% 41.21% 43.83% 82.01% 2.30% 45.71% 81.90% 21.44% 41.74% 5.23% 31.69% 32.11% 53.87% # of Onboardings 9 1 15 41 26 34 23 83 32 64 35 3 68 75 4 121 9 2 1 29 PART I: I. Contractor Responsiveness: 9 0 0 0 0 9 0 18 0 0 18 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 Team 1. Contractor met 60%: 9 0 YES NO NO NO NO YES NO YES NO NO YES NO NO YES NO NO NO NO NO NO Team 2. Contractor met 75%: 9 0 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO YES NO NO YES NO NO YES NO NO NO NO NO NO II. Compliance Review: 6 12 12 9 9 12 15 12 6 12 9 6 15 15 12 18 12 12 3 6 VR Review 1. Maintained adequate insurance 3 0 YES YES YES YES YES YES YES NO YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES Connie/ Team 2. Paid/filed Administrative fee per 6.2.4 3 0 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO YES NO YES YES YES NO NO NO Team 3. Submitted monthly M/WBE reports (section 6.2.7) 3 0 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO Team 4. Submitted monthly reports to the MSP 3 0 NO YES YES YES NO YES YES YES NO YES NO NO YES YES YES YES YES NO N/A NO Team 5. Submitted required Form B (section 5.16) on a timely basis (Form 7 - annually May) 3 0 NO N/A N/A NO NO NO YES YES NO NO YES N/A NO YES N/A YES NO YES N/A NO Team 6. Contractor paid sub-contractors/ Consultants on time (no later than 15 days after payment from OGS) 3 0 YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES N/A YES VR/TEAM 7. Recertified Vendor Responisibility Questionairre (section 5.12) & found to be a Responisible Vendor. 3 0 NO YES YES NO YES YES YES YES NO YES NO NO YES YES NO YES NO YES NO NO III. M/WBE Participation Goals 3 3 3 3 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 0 3 3 0 3 0 3 M/WBE 1. Contractor engaged in good faith efforts to meet the participation goals: MBE 11%, WBE 9% 3 0 YES YES YES YES NO YES YES YES YES YES YES YES NO NO YES YES NO YES N/A YES 18 21 3
12

s.s .. . on.d. . CeC.online.ogs.ny.gov/purchase/snt/awardnotes/7301222439AllYearsFi… · VR Review 1. Maintained adequate insurance 3 0 YES YES YES YES YES YES YES NO YES YES YES

Nov 03, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: s.s .. . on.d. . CeC.online.ogs.ny.gov/purchase/snt/awardnotes/7301222439AllYearsFi… · VR Review 1. Maintained adequate insurance 3 0 YES YES YES YES YES YES YES NO YES YES YES

Year 1

Artech

Info

rmatio

n Syst

ems

CGI Tech

nologi

es and So

lutio

ns Inc.

CMA C

onsulti

ng Serv

ices.

Compute

r Aid

Inc.

Experis

US I

nc.

GCom So

ftware

Inc.

Genesys C

onsulti

ng Serv

ices I

nc.

IIT In

c.

Info

people C

orpora

tion

Knowle

dge B

uilders

Inc.

Logi

c House

Ltd.

Logi

c Tech

nology

Inc.

MVP C

onsulti

ng Plu

s Inc.

NTT Data

Inc.

Precis

ion T

ask G

roup In

c.

PSI In

tern

ational I

nc.

Syst

em E

dge (U

S) LL

C

Temposit

ions I

nc. d/b

/a C

ompufo

rce

Univers

al Tech

nologi

es LLC

US Tech

Solu

tions In

c.

SCORE

Cumulative Score: YES NO 70 67 73 64 61 76 76 85 61 67 82 61 73 91 73 73 64 67 55 61

# of Valid Candidate Response Forms Submitted 713 81 274 243 234 668 389 824 394 419 784 22 437 783 205 399 50 303 307 515

Contractor Responsiveness Rate: 74.58% 8.47% 28.66% 25.42% 24.48% 69.87% 40.69% 86.19% 41.21% 43.83% 82.01% 2.30% 45.71% 81.90% 21.44% 41.74% 5.23% 31.69% 32.11% 53.87%

# of Onboardings 9 1 15 41 26 34 23 83 32 64 35 3 68 75 4 121 9 2 1 29

PART I:

I. Contractor Responsiveness: 9 0 0 0 0 9 0 18 0 0 18 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0

Team 1. Contractor met 60%: 9 0 YES NO NO NO NO YES NO YES NO NO YES NO NO YES NO NO NO NO NO NO

Team 2. Contractor met 75%: 9 0 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO YES NO NO YES NO NO YES NO NO NO NO NO NO

II. Compliance Review: 6 12 12 9 9 12 15 12 6 12 9 6 15 15 12 18 12 12 3 6

VR

Review1. Maintained adequate insurance 3 0 YES YES YES YES YES YES YES NO YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES

Connie/

Team2. Paid/filed Administrative fee per 6.2.4 3 0 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO YES NO YES YES YES NO NO NO

Team 3. Submitted monthly M/WBE reports (section 6.2.7) 3 0 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

Team 4. Submitted monthly reports to the MSP 3 0 NO YES YES YES NO YES YES YES NO YES NO NO YES YES YES YES YES NO N/A NO

Team 5.

Submitted required Form B (section 5.16) on a timely

basis

(Form 7 - annually May)

3 0 NO N/A N/A NO NO NO YES YES NO NO YES N/A NO YES N/A YES NO YES N/A NO

Team 6.Contractor paid sub-contractors/ Consultants on time

(no later than 15 days after payment from OGS)3 0 YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES N/A YES

VR/TEAM 7.Recertified Vendor Responisibility Questionairre (section

5.12) & found to be a Responisible Vendor. 3 0 NO YES YES NO YES YES YES YES NO YES NO NO YES YES NO YES NO YES NO NO

III. M/WBE Participation Goals 3 3 3 3 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 0 3 3 0 3 0 3

M/WBE 1.

Contractor engaged in good faith efforts to meet the

participation goals:

MBE 11%, WBE 9%

3 0 YES YES YES YES NO YES YES YES YES YES YES YES NO NO YES YES NO YES N/A YES

18

21

3

Page 2: s.s .. . on.d. . CeC.online.ogs.ny.gov/purchase/snt/awardnotes/7301222439AllYearsFi… · VR Review 1. Maintained adequate insurance 3 0 YES YES YES YES YES YES YES NO YES YES YES

Year 1

Artech

Info

rmatio

n Syst

ems

CGI Tech

nologi

es and So

lutio

ns Inc.

CMA C

onsulti

ng Serv

ices.

Compute

r Aid

Inc.

Experis

US I

nc.

GCom So

ftware

Inc.

Genesys C

onsulti

ng Serv

ices I

nc.

IIT In

c.

Info

people C

orpora

tion

Knowle

dge B

uilders

Inc.

Logi

c House

Ltd.

Logi

c Tech

nology

Inc.

MVP C

onsulti

ng Plu

s Inc.

NTT Data

Inc.

Precis

ion T

ask G

roup In

c.

PSI In

tern

ational I

nc.

Syst

em E

dge (U

S) LL

C

Temposit

ions I

nc. d/b

/a C

ompufo

rce

Univers

al Tech

nologi

es LLC

US Tech

Solu

tions In

c.

SCORE

Cumulative Score: YES NO 70 67 73 64 61 76 76 85 61 67 82 61 73 91 73 73 64 67 55 61

IV. General Quality 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18

Team 1.Contractor received 3 or more vendor issue forms in the

past 12 months0 6 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

Team 2.Contractor received one vendor issue forms in the past

12 months0 6 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

None

Received3.

Contractor has received a satisfaction survey(s) for less

than 70 points in the past 12 months0 6 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

V. Administration 3 3 9 3 3 3 9 3 3 3 3 3 9 9 9 3 3 3 3 3

Team 1.Contractor submitted monthly reports to the MSP past

the required 15 days from the last day of the month(3) 3 YES YES NO YES YES YES NO YES YES YES YES YES NO NO NO YES YES YES YES YES

Kelly's

Team2.

Contractor's invoices were submitted to OGS later past

the required fifteen days from the last day of the monht

of completed work

(3) 3 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

Kelly's

Team3.

Contractor's invoices were inaccurate on two or more

occastions based on a camparison of the submitted

invoices with the monthly report published by the

database

(3) 3 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

VI. Payment of Consultant Hourly Wage Rate 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

Team 1.

In the past 12 months, contractor was found in ONE

instance to have not paid a consultant the Hourly Wage

Rate within the slight deviation

0 3 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

Team 2.

In the past 12 months, contractor was found inTWO OR

MORE instances to have not paid a consultant the Hourly

Wage Rate within the slight deviation

0 3 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

PART II:

Authorized User Evaluation 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25

6

25

18

9

Page 3: s.s .. . on.d. . CeC.online.ogs.ny.gov/purchase/snt/awardnotes/7301222439AllYearsFi… · VR Review 1. Maintained adequate insurance 3 0 YES YES YES YES YES YES YES NO YES YES YES

YEAR 2

HBITS PERFOMANCE

EVALUATION RESULTS

Artech

Info

rmatio

n Syst

ems

CGI Tech

nologie

s and Solu

tions I

nc.

CMA C

onsulti

ng Serv

ices.

Compute

r Aid

Inc.

Compute

r Tech

nology S

ervice

s

GCom Softw

are In

c.

Genesys C

onsulti

ng Serv

ices I

nc.

IIT In

c.

Knowle

dge B

uilders

Inc.

Logic

House

Ltd.

MVP C

onsulti

ng Plu

s Inc.

NTT Data

Inc.

Precis

ion T

ask G

roup In

c.

PSI In

tern

ational I

nc.

QED Natio

nal

RMS C

ompute

r Corp

Softw

are P

eople

Syst

em Edge

(US)

LLC

Temposit

ions I

nc. d/b

/a C

ompufo

rce

V Gro

up Inc.

SCORE

Total TO's Cumulative Score: YES NO 88.00 61.00 76.00 79.00 64.00 82.00 85.00 75.00 85.00 86.50 68.97 75.42 70.00 74.24 64.00 61.00 68.00 70.00 64.00 79.00

574 # of Valid Candidate Response Forms Submitted 472 4 123 290 202 362 398 488 406 474 417 540 124 377 124 27 427 176 119 439

Contractor Responsiveness Rate: 82.23% 0.70% 21.43% 50.52% 35.19% 63.07% 69.34% 85.02% 70.73% 82.58% 72.65% 94.08% 21.60% 65.68% 21.60% 4.70% 74.39% 30.66% 20.73% 76.48%

Total # of Onboardings (Year 2) 10 0 5 19 17 23 12 66 23 16 55 31 4 51 9 0 27 13 1 19

Total # of Onboardings (Life to date) 22 1 20 62 17 63 37 169 100 57 138 115 9 192 9 0 27 22 5 19

PART I:

I. Contractor Responsiveness: 18 0 0 0 0 9 9 18 9 18 9 18 0 9 0 0 9 0 0 18

Team 1. Contractor met 60%: 9 0 YES NO NO NO NO YES YES YES YES YES YES YES NO YES NO NO YES NO NO YES

Team 2. Contractor met 75%: 9 0 YES NO NO NO NO NO NO YES NO YES NO YES NO NO NO NO NO NO NO YES

II. Compliance Review: 15 9 15 18 12 12 15 9 15 18 15 15 9 18 12 6 9 9 9 9

VR

Review1. Maintained adequate insurance 3 0 YES YES YES YES YES YES NO NO YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES

Connie/

Team2. Paid/filed Administrative fee per 6.2.4 3 0 YES NO YES YES NO NO YES NO YES NO NO NO NO YES YES NO NO NO NO NO

Team 3. Submitted monthly M/WBE reports (section 6.2.7) 3 0 NO NO NO YES NO NO NO NO NO YES NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

Team 4. Submitted monthly reports to the MSP 3 0 YES NO YES YES NO YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES NO YES YES YES NO

Team 5.

Submitted required Form B (section 5.16) on a timely

basis

(Form 7 - annually May)

3 0 YES NO NO YES YES NO YES NO NO YES YES YES NO YES NO NO NO NO NO NO

Team 6.Contractor paid sub-contractors/ Consultants on time

(no later than 15 days after payment from OGS)3 0 YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES

VR/TEAM 7.Recertified Vendor Responsibility Questionnaire (section

5.12) & found to be a Responsible Vendor. 3 0 NO YES YES NO YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES NO YES NO NO NO NO NO YES

III. M/WBE Participation Goals 3 0 3 3 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 3 3 0 3 3 3 3 0

M/WBE 1.

Contractor engaged in good faith efforts to meet the

participation goals:

MBE 11%, WBE 9%

3 0 YES NO YES YES NO YES YES YES YES YES YES NO YES YES NO YES YES YES YES NO

IV. General Quality 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 12 18 12 12 12 18 12 18 18 12 18 18 18

Team 1.Contractor received 3 or more vendor issue forms in the

past 12 months0 6 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

Team 2.Contractor received one vendor issue forms in the past

12 months0 6 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

None

Received3.

Contractor has received a satisfaction survey(s) for less

than 70 points in the past 12 months0 6 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO YES NO YES YES YES NO YES NO NO YES NO NO NO

18

21

3

18

HBITS Year 2 "Report Card" DRAFT 5/31/14

Page 4: s.s .. . on.d. . CeC.online.ogs.ny.gov/purchase/snt/awardnotes/7301222439AllYearsFi… · VR Review 1. Maintained adequate insurance 3 0 YES YES YES YES YES YES YES NO YES YES YES

YEAR 2

HBITS PERFOMANCE

EVALUATION RESULTS

Artech

Info

rmatio

n Syst

ems

CGI Tech

nologie

s and Solu

tions I

nc.

CMA C

onsulti

ng Serv

ices.

Compute

r Aid

Inc.

Compute

r Tech

nology S

ervice

s

GCom Softw

are In

c.

Genesys C

onsulti

ng Serv

ices I

nc.

IIT In

c.

Knowle

dge B

uilders

Inc.

Logic

House

Ltd.

MVP C

onsulti

ng Plu

s Inc.

NTT Data

Inc.

Precis

ion T

ask G

roup In

c.

PSI In

tern

ational I

nc.

QED Natio

nal

RMS C

ompute

r Corp

Softw

are P

eople

Syst

em Edge

(US)

LLC

Temposit

ions I

nc. d/b

/a C

ompufo

rce

V Gro

up Inc.

SCORE

Total TO's Cumulative Score: YES NO 88.00 61.00 76.00 79.00 64.00 82.00 85.00 75.00 85.00 86.50 68.97 75.42 70.00 74.24 64.00 61.00 68.00 70.00 64.00 79.00

V. Administration 3 3 9 9 3 9 9 9 9 9 3 3 9 3 3 3 9 9 3 3

Team 1.Contractor submitted monthly reports to the MSP past

the required 15 days from the last day of the month(3) 3 YES YES NO NO YES NO NO NO NO NO YES YES NO YES YES YES NO NO YES YES

Kelly's

Team2.

Contractor's invoices were submitted to OGS later past

the required fifteen days from the last day of the month

of completed work

(3) 3 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

Kelly's

Team3.

Contractor's invoices were inaccurate on two or more

occasions based on a comparison of the submitted

invoices with the monthly report published by the

database

(3) 3 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

VI. Payment of Consultant Hourly Wage Rate 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

Team 1.

In the past 12 months, contractor was found in ONE

instance to have not paid a consultant the Hourly Wage

Rate within the slight deviation

0 3 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

Team 2.

In the past 12 months, contractor was found in TWO OR

MORE instances to have not paid a consultant the Hourly

Wage Rate within the slight deviation

0 3 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

PART II:

Authorized User Evaluation 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 18.00 25.00 20.50 20.97 21.42 25.00 23.24 25.00 25.00 20.00 25.00 25.00 25.00

6

25

9

HBITS Year 2 "Report Card" DRAFT 5/31/14

Page 5: s.s .. . on.d. . CeC.online.ogs.ny.gov/purchase/snt/awardnotes/7301222439AllYearsFi… · VR Review 1. Maintained adequate insurance 3 0 YES YES YES YES YES YES YES NO YES YES YES

YEAR 3

HBITS PERFOMANCE

EVALUATION RESULTS

Artech

Info

rmatio

n Syst

ems

CMA C

onsulti

ng Serv

ices.

Compute

r Aid

Inc.

Experis

GCom So

ftware

Inc.

Genesys C

onsulti

ng Serv

ices I

nc.

IIT In

c.

Info

People C

orp

Knowle

dge B

uilders

Inc.

Logi

c House

Ltd.

Logi

c Tech

nology

Inc

MVP C

onsulti

ng Plu

s Inc.

NTT Data

Inc.

Precis

ion T

ask G

roup In

c.

PSI In

tern

ational I

nc.

Softw

are P

eople

Syst

em E

dge (U

S) LL

C

Univers

al Tech

nologi

es LLC

US Tech

Solu

tions

V Gro

up Inc.

SCORE

Total TO's Cumulative Score: YES NO 76.15 60.58 75.07 76.00 82.50 85.72 72.95 82.00 82.88 90.50 64.00 75.96 80.57 59.00 92.00 73.735 44.21 64.00 84.25 62.00

1096 # of Valid Candidate Response Forms Submitted 831 145 781 18 718 967 992 797 834 911 17 809 1017 135 832 1047 286 1 912 778

Contractor Responsiveness Rate: 75.82% 13.23% 71.26% 1.64% 65.51% 88.23% 90.51% 72.72% 76.09% 83.12% 1.55% 73.81% 92.79% 12.32% 75.91% 95.53% 26.09% 0.09% 83.21% 70.99%

Total # of Onboardings (Year 3) 11 8 52 1 32 18 120 7 104 38 0 89 53 5 129 75 21 0 28 18

Total # of Onboardings (Life to date) 38 29 112 30 91 58 295 43 201 93 3 227 169 13 318 100 43 1 67 36

PART I:

I. Contractor Responsiveness: 18 0 9 0 9 18 18 9 18 18 0 9 18 0 18 18 0 0 18 9

Team 1. Contractor met 60%: 9 0 YES NO YES NO YES YES YES YES YES YES NO YES YES NO YES YES NO NO YES YES

Team 2. Contractor met 75%: 9 0 YES NO NO NO NO YES YES NO YES YES NO NO YES NO YES YES NO NO YES NO

II. Compliance Review: 18 18 21 15 21 21 15 18 18 21 12 21 18 15 21 21 9 12 21 21

Team/Custo

mer Svcs1. Maintained adequate insurance 3 0 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes

Pat

Weidman/T

eam

2. Paid/filed Administrative fee per 6.2.4 3 0 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes

Team 3. Submitted monthly M/WBE reports (section 6.2.7) 3 0 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Team 4. Submitted monthly reports to the MSP 3 0 No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes

Team 5.

Submitted required Form B (section 5.16) on a timely

basis

(Form 7 - annually May)

3 0 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes

Team 6.Contractor paid sub-contractors/ Consultants on time

(no later than 15 days after payment from OGS)3 0 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

VR/TEAM 7.Recertified Vendor Responsibility Questionnaire (section

5.12) & found to be a Responsible Vendor. 3 0 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

III. M/WBE Participation Goals 3 3 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 3 0 3 3 3 0 0 3 0

M/WBE 1.

Contractor engaged in good faith efforts to meet the

participation goals:

MBE 11%, WBE 9%

3 0 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No

IV. General Quality 12 12 12 18 12 12 6 18 12 12 18 6 6 12 12 0 12 18 6 12

4 1.Contractor received 3 or more vendor issue forms in the

past 12 months0 6 No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No

Team 2.Contractor received one vendor issue forms in the past

12 months0 6 No No No No No No Yes No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes No

Team 3.Contractor has received a satisfaction survey(s) for less

than 70 points in the past 12 months0 6 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes

V. Administration 3 3 9 9 9 9 9 3 3 9 3 9 9 3 9 9 3 3 9 9

Team 1.Contractor submitted monthly reports to the MSP past

the required 15 days from the last day of the month(3) 3 Yes Yes No No No No No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes No No

HBITS

Invoicing2.

Contractor's invoices were submitted to OGS later past

the required fifteen days from the last day of the month

of completed work

(3) 3 No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No

HBITS

Invoicing3.

Contractor's invoices were inaccurate on two or more

occasions based on a comparison of the submitted

invoices with the monthly report published by the

database

(3) 3 No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No

VI. Payment of Consultant Hourly Wage Rate 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

Team 1.

In the past 12 months, contractor was found in ONE

instance to have not paid a consultant the Hourly Wage

Rate within the slight deviation

0 3 No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No

Team 2.

In the past 12 months, contractor was found in TWO OR

MORE instances to have not paid a consultant the Hourly

Wage Rate within the slight deviation

0 3 No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No

PART II:

Authorized User Evaluation 16.15 18.58 18.07 25.00 22.50 16.72 15.95 25.00 22.88 21.50 25.00 21.96 23.57 20.00 23.00 16.74 14.21 25.00 21.25 5.00

6

25

18

21

3

18

9

HBITS Year 3 "Report Card - Revised 11-10-15" 10/30/15

Page 6: s.s .. . on.d. . CeC.online.ogs.ny.gov/purchase/snt/awardnotes/7301222439AllYearsFi… · VR Review 1. Maintained adequate insurance 3 0 YES YES YES YES YES YES YES NO YES YES YES

YEAR 3

HBITS PERFOMANCE

EVALUATION RESULTS

Artech

Info

rmatio

n Syst

ems

CMA C

onsulti

ng Serv

ices.

Compute

r Aid

Inc.

Experis

GCom So

ftware

Inc.

Genesys C

onsulti

ng Serv

ices I

nc.

IIT In

c.

Info

People C

orp

Knowle

dge B

uilders

Inc.

Logi

c House

Ltd.

Logi

c Tech

nology

Inc

MVP C

onsulti

ng Plu

s Inc.

NTT Data

Inc.

Precis

ion T

ask G

roup In

c.

PSI In

tern

ational I

nc.

Softw

are P

eople

Syst

em E

dge (U

S) LL

C

Univers

al Tech

nologi

es LLC

US Tech

Solu

tions

V Gro

up Inc.

SCORE

Total TO's Cumulative Score: YES NO 76.15 60.58 75.07 76.00 82.50 85.72 72.95 82.00 82.88 90.50 64.00 75.96 80.57 59.00 92.00 73.735 44.21 64.00 84.25 62.00

Average (row 4) 64.60 74.33 72.29 100.00 90.00 66.88 63.80 100.00 91.50 86.00 100.00 87.85 94.29 80.00 92.00 66.94 56.83 100.00 85.00 20.00

Total Count (row 2) 5 6 7 0 6 8 25 2 10 10 0 33 15 4 52 18 6 0 4 1

Low Score (row 3) Low 25.00 25.00 26.00 100.00 40.00 40.00 0.00 100.00 31.00 15.00 100.00 30.00 55.00 55.00 0.00 20.00 30.00 100.00 60.00 20.00

HBITS Year 3 "Report Card - Revised 11-10-15" 10/30/15

Page 7: s.s .. . on.d. . CeC.online.ogs.ny.gov/purchase/snt/awardnotes/7301222439AllYearsFi… · VR Review 1. Maintained adequate insurance 3 0 YES YES YES YES YES YES YES NO YES YES YES

YEAR 4

HBITS PERFOMANCE

EVALUATION RESULTS

Artech

Info

rmatio

n Syst

ems

CGI Tech

nologi

es and So

lutio

ns Inc.

CMA C

onsulti

ng Serv

ices.

Compute

r Aid

Inc.

Compute

r Tech

nology

Serv

ices

Experis

GCom So

ftware

Inc.

Genesys C

onsulti

ng Serv

ices I

nc.

IIT In

c.

Info

People C

orp

Knowle

dge B

uilders

Inc.

Logic

House Lt

d.

Logic

Technolo

gy In

c

MVP C

onsulti

ng Plu

s Inc.

NTT Data

Inc.

Precis

ion T

ask G

roup In

c.

PSI In

tern

ational I

nc.

QED Natio

nal

RMS C

ompute

r Corp

Softw

are P

eople

Syst

em E

dge (U

S) LL

C

Temposit

ions I

nc. d/b

/a C

ompufo

rce

Univers

al Tech

nologie

s LLC

US Tech

V Gro

up Inc.

SCORE

Total TO's Cumulative Score: YES NO 82.00 64.00 76.00 70.38 65.50 73.00 73.08 100.00 90.61 85.00 83.76 86.95 52.75 76.25 92.93 34.75 91.50 76.00 82.00 83.74 67.08 64.00 52.00 69.75 53.56

727 # of Valid Candidate Response Forms Submitted 555 10 0 530 678 13 370 692 649 545 663 685 0 484 711 0 629 117 84 688 0 44 0 674 0

Contractor Responsiveness Rate: 76.34% 1.38% 0.00% 72.90% 93.26% 1.79% 50.89% 95.19% 89.27% 74.97% 91.20% 94.22% 0.00% 66.57% 97.80% 0.00% 86.52% 16.09% 11.55% 94.64% 0.00% 6.05% 0.00% 92.71% 0.00%

(as of 10-19-16) Total # of Onboardings (Year 4) 8 0 0 12 26 0 16 10 70 2 39 30 0 51 27 0 97 2 8 40 0 4 0 28 0

Total # of Onboardings (Life to date) 50 1 30 126 52 30 111 71 395 45 260 137 3 304 206 16 448 12 8 158 51 21 1 12 39

PART I:

I. Contractor Responsiveness: 18 0 0 9 18 0 0 18 18 9 18 18 0 9 18 0 18 0 0 18 0 0 0 18 0

Team 1. Contractor met 60%: 9 0 YES NO NO YES YES NO NO YES YES YES YES YES NO YES YES NO YES NO NO YES NO NO NO YES NO

Team 2. Contractor met 75%: 9 0 YES NO NO NO YES NO NO YES YES NO YES YES NO NO YES NO YES NO NO YES NO NO NO YES NO

II. Compliance Review: 9 12 15 15 15 12 21 21 21 15 15 21 12 15 18 9 21 18 21 21 15 9 6 15 9

Team 1. Maintained adequate insurance 3 0 No No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No

Admin/Team 2. Paid/filed Administrative fee per 6.2.4 3 0 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes

Team 3. Submitted monthly M/WBE reports (section 6.2.7) 3 0 No No Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes No

Team 4. Submitted monthly reports to the MSP 3 0 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes

Team 5.

Submitted required Form B (section 5.16) on a timely

basis

(Form 7 - annually May)

3 0 No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No

Team 6.Contractor paid sub-contractors/ Consultants on time

(no later than 15 days after payment from OGS)3 0 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Cust Svc/Team 7.Recertified Vendor Responsibility Questionnaire (section

5.12) & found to be a Responsible Vendor. 3 0 No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No

III. M/WBE Participation Goals 3 0 3 0 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 3 0 3 3 0 3 3 3 3 0 3 3

M/WBE 1.

Contractor engaged in good faith efforts to meet the

participation goals:

MBE 11%, WBE 9%

3 0 Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes

IV. General Quality 12 12 18 12 6 18 12 18 12 18 12 12 12 12 18 0 12 18 18 6 12 18 12 0 6

Team 1.Contractor received 3 or more vendor issue forms in the

past 12 months0 6 No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No Yes No

Team 2.Contractor received one vendor issue forms in the past

12 months0 6 Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes

Team 3.Contractor has received a satisfaction survey(s) for less

than 70 points in the past 12 months0 6 No No No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes

18

21

3

18

HBITS Year 2 "Report Card" DRAFT 5/31/14

Page 8: s.s .. . on.d. . CeC.online.ogs.ny.gov/purchase/snt/awardnotes/7301222439AllYearsFi… · VR Review 1. Maintained adequate insurance 3 0 YES YES YES YES YES YES YES NO YES YES YES

YEAR 4

HBITS PERFOMANCE

EVALUATION RESULTS

Artech

Info

rmatio

n Syst

ems

CGI Tech

nologi

es and So

lutio

ns Inc.

CMA C

onsulti

ng Serv

ices.

Compute

r Aid

Inc.

Compute

r Tech

nology

Serv

ices

Experis

GCom So

ftware

Inc.

Genesys C

onsulti

ng Serv

ices I

nc.

IIT In

c.

Info

People C

orp

Knowle

dge B

uilders

Inc.

Logic

House Lt

d.

Logic

Technolo

gy In

c

MVP C

onsulti

ng Plu

s Inc.

NTT Data

Inc.

Precis

ion T

ask G

roup In

c.

PSI In

tern

ational I

nc.

QED Natio

nal

RMS C

ompute

r Corp

Softw

are P

eople

Syst

em E

dge (U

S) LL

C

Temposit

ions I

nc. d/b

/a C

ompufo

rce

Univers

al Tech

nologie

s LLC

US Tech

V Gro

up Inc.

SCORE

Total TO's Cumulative Score: YES NO 82.00 64.00 76.00 70.38 65.50 73.00 73.08 100.00 90.61 85.00 83.76 86.95 52.75 76.25 92.93 34.75 91.50 76.00 82.00 83.74 67.08 64.00 52.00 69.75 53.56

V. Administration 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 3 9 9 9 9 9 3 3 9 9

Team 1.Contractor submitted monthly reports to the MSP past

the required 15 days from the last day of the month(3) 3 No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes Yes No No

Invoicing Team 2.

Contractor's invoices were submitted to OGS past the

required fifteen days from the last day of the month of

completed work

(3) 3 No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No

Invoicing Team 3.

Contractor's invoices were inaccurate on two or more

occasions based on a comparison of the submitted

invoices with the monthly report published by the

database

(3) 3 No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No

VI. Payment of Consultant Hourly Wage Rate 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

Team 1.

In the past 12 months, contractor was found in ONE

instance to have not paid a consultant the Hourly Wage

Rate within the slight deviation

0 3 No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No

Team 2.

In the past 12 months, contractor was found in TWO OR

MORE instances to have not paid a consultant the Hourly

Wage Rate within the slight deviation

0 3 No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No

PART II:

Team Authorized User Evaluation 25.00 25.00 25.00 19.38 11.50 25.00 22.08 25.00 21.61 25.00 20.76 17.95 13.75 22.25 23.93 13.75 22.50 25.00 25.00 20.74 22.08 25.00 25.00 18.75 20.56

Average (row 4) 100.00 100.00 100.00 77.50 46.00 100.00 88.33 100.00 86.43 100.00 83.04 71.79 55.00 89.00 95.71 55.00 90.00 100.00 100.00 82.95 88.33 100.00 100.00 75.00 82.22

Total Count (row 2) 0 0 1 4 5 0 3 2 28 0 28 14 1 25 7 1 50 1 0 22 6 0 0 8 9

Low Score (row 3) Low 100.00 100.00 100.00 45.00 0.00 100.00 65.00 100.00 25.00 100.00 5.00 0.00 55.00 35.00 80.00 55.00 0.00 100.00 100.00 25.00 50.00 100.00 100.00 45.00 40.00

6

25

9

HBITS Year 2 "Report Card" DRAFT 5/31/14

Page 9: s.s .. . on.d. . CeC.online.ogs.ny.gov/purchase/snt/awardnotes/7301222439AllYearsFi… · VR Review 1. Maintained adequate insurance 3 0 YES YES YES YES YES YES YES NO YES YES YES

HBITS Year 2 "Report Card" DRAFT 5/31/14

YEAR 5HBITS PERFOMANCE

EVALUATION RESULTS

Artech

Inform

ation Sy

stems

CMA Consultin

g Servi

ces.

Computer Aid In

c.

Experis

GCom Softw

are Inc.

Genesys Consu

lting S

ervice

s Inc.

IIT In

c.

InfoPeople Corp

Knowledge Build

ers Inc.

Logic

House Lt

d.

MVP Consultin

g Plus I

nc.

NTT Data Inc.

Precision Task

Group In

c.

PSI Internatio

nal Inc.

QED National

RMS Computer C

orp

Softw

are People

Syste

m Edge (U

S) LLC

US Tech

V Group In

c.

SCORETotal TO's Cumulative Score: YES NO 88.00 82.00 64.50 76.00 82.00 90.88 86.72 100.00 92.13 84.00 82.38 97.00 82.00 83.29 73.00 79.00 88.93 85.50 81.13 88.00

1027 # of Valid Candidate Response Forms Submitted 730 113 770 63 461 1011 915 794 938 954 625 988 195 841 17 181 965 759 960 747Contractor Responsiveness Rate: 71.08% 11.00% 74.98% 6.13% 44.89% 98.44% 89.09% 77.31% 91.33% 92.89% 60.86% 96.20% 18.99% 81.89% 1.66% 17.62% 93.96% 73.90% 93.48% 72.74%Total # of Onboardings (Year 5) 1 12 27 0 12 16 94 3 73 52 62 47 4 148 0 6 52 28 42 3

Total # of Onboardings (Life to date) 51 42 162 32 125 90 512 48 370 195 382 257 20 622 13 15 220 79 151 42PART I:

I. Contractor Responsiveness: 9 0 9 0 0 18 18 18 18 18 9 18 0 18 0 0 18 9 18 9Team 1. Contractor met 60%: 9 0 YES NO YES NO NO YES YES YES YES YES YES YES NO YES NO NO YES YES YES YESTeam 2. Contractor met 75%: 9 0 NO NO NO NO NO YES YES YES YES YES NO YES NO YES NO NO YES NO YES NO

II. Compliance Review: 18 21 21 15 21 21 18 21 21 21 21 21 21 18 18 21 21 18 21 18Team 1. Maintained adequate insurance 3 0 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Admin/Team 2. Paid/filed Administrative fee per 6.2.4 3 0 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes YesTeam 3. Submitted monthly M/WBE reports (section 6.2.7) 3 0 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes YesTeam 4. Submitted monthly reports to the MSP 3 0 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Team 5.Submitted required Form B (section 5.16) on a timely

basis(Form 7 - annually May)

3 0 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No

Team 6. Contractor paid sub-contractors/ Consultants on time (no later than 15 days after payment from OGS)

3 0 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Cust Svc/Team 7. Recertified Vendor Responsibility Questionnaire (section 5.12) & found to be a Responsible Vendor.

3 0 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

III. M/WBE Participation Goals 3 3 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 3 3 3 0 3 3 3 3

M/WBE 1.Contractor engaged in good faith efforts to meet the

participation goals:MBE 11%, WBE 9%

3 0 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes

IV. General Quality 18 18 12 18 18 12 12 18 12 12 12 18 18 6 18 18 12 18 6 18

Team 1. Contractor received 3 or more vendor issue forms in the past 12 months

0 6 No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No

Team 2. Contractor received one vendor issue forms in the past 12 months

0 6 No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No Yes No

Team 3. Contractor has received a satisfaction survey(s) for less than 70 points in the past 12 months

0 6 No No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes No Yes No

V. Administration 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 3 9 9 9 9 9

Team 1. Contractor submitted monthly reports to the MSP past the required 15 days from the last day of the month

(3) 3 No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No

Invoicing Team 2.Contractor's invoices were submitted to OGS past the

required fifteen days from the last day of the month of completed work

(3) 3 No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No

Invoicing Team 3.

Contractor's invoices were inaccurate on two or more occasions based on a comparison of the submitted invoices with the monthly report published by the

database

(3) 3 No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No

VI. Payment of Consultant Hourly Wage Rate 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 66

18

21

3

18

9

Page 10: s.s .. . on.d. . CeC.online.ogs.ny.gov/purchase/snt/awardnotes/7301222439AllYearsFi… · VR Review 1. Maintained adequate insurance 3 0 YES YES YES YES YES YES YES NO YES YES YES

HBITS Year 2 "Report Card" DRAFT 5/31/14

YEAR 5HBITS PERFOMANCE

EVALUATION RESULTS

Artech

Inform

ation Sy

stems

CMA Consultin

g Servi

ces.

Computer Aid In

c.

Experis

GCom Softw

are Inc.

Genesys Consu

lting S

ervice

s Inc.

IIT In

c.

InfoPeople Corp

Knowledge Build

ers Inc.

Logic

House Lt

d.

MVP Consultin

g Plus I

nc.

NTT Data Inc.

Precision Task

Group In

c.

PSI Internatio

nal Inc.

QED National

RMS Computer C

orp

Softw

are People

Syste

m Edge (U

S) LLC

US Tech

V Group In

c.

SCORETotal TO's Cumulative Score: YES NO 88.00 82.00 64.50 76.00 82.00 90.88 86.72 100.00 92.13 84.00 82.38 97.00 82.00 83.29 73.00 79.00 88.93 85.50 81.13 88.00

Team 1.In the past 12 months, contractor was found in ONE

instance to have not paid a consultant the Hourly Wage Rate within the slight deviation

0 3 No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No

Team 2.In the past 12 months, contractor was found in TWO OR MORE instances to have not paid a consultant the Hourly

Wage Rate within the slight deviation0 3 No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No

PART II:Authorized User Evaluation 25.00 25.00 7.50 25.00 25.00 21.88 20.72 25.00 23.13 15.00 22.38 25.00 25.00 23.29 25.00 25.00 19.93 22.50 18.13 25.00

Average (row 4) 100.00 100.00 30.00 100.00 100.00 87.50 82.86 100.00 92.50 60.00 89.53 100.00 100.00 93.16 100.00 100.00 79.71 90.00 72.50 100.00Total Count (row 2) 1 1 2 0 0 4 21 0 12 7 32 1 2 49 0 0 17 3 4 2Low Score (row 3) Low 100.00 100.00 10.00 100.00 100.00 50.00 30.00 100.00 35.00 5.00 45.00 100.00 100.00 15.00 100.00 100.00 30.00 70.00 45.00 100.00

25

Page 11: s.s .. . on.d. . CeC.online.ogs.ny.gov/purchase/snt/awardnotes/7301222439AllYearsFi… · VR Review 1. Maintained adequate insurance 3 0 YES YES YES YES YES YES YES NO YES YES YES

YEAR 6HBITS PERFOMANCE

EVALUATION RESULTS

Artech

Inform

ation Sy

stems

CMA Consultin

g Servi

ces

Computer Tech

nology Se

rvice

s

GCom Softw

are Inc.

Genesys Consu

lting S

ervice

s Inc.

IIT In

c.

InfoPeople Corp

Knowledge Build

ers Inc.

Logic

House Lt

d.

MVP Consultin

g Plus I

nc.

NTT Data Inc.

Precision Task

Group In

c.

PSI Internatio

nal Inc.

RMS Computer C

orp

Softw

are People

Syste

m Edge (U

S) LLC

Tempositions I

nc. d/b

/a Compuforce

Universa

l Tech

nologies L

LC

US Tech

V Group In

c.

SCORETotal TO's Cumulative Score: YES NO 73.00 70.00 82.00 73.00 100.00 84.63 97.00 99.94 58.32 78.70 81.13 67.00 75.29 78.38 52.49 85.00 67.00 79.00 60.59 85.00

713 # of Valid Candidate Response Forms Submitted 465 68 479 89 700 616 596 668 640 453 682 180 604 163 665 592 8 2 651 519Contractor Responsiveness Rate: 65.22% 9.54% 67.18% 12.48% 98.18% 86.40% 83.59% 93.69% 89.76% 63.53% 95.65% 25.25% 84.71% 22.86% 93.27% 83.03% 1.12% 0.28% 91.30% 72.79%Total # of Onboardings (Year 6) 1 1 21 18 14 58 4 53 44 53 28 3 84 4 36 15 0 0 31 17

Total # of Onboardings (Life to date) 52 43 77 146 106 593 53 443 250 453 293 24 739 20 269 98 20 1 196 59PART I:

I. Contractor Responsiveness: 9 0 9 0 18 18 18 18 18 9 18 0 18 0 18 18 0 0 18 9Team 1. Contractor met 60%: 9 0 YES NO YES NO YES YES YES YES YES YES YES NO YES NO YES YES NO NO YES YESTeam 2. Contractor met 75%: 9 0 NO NO NO NO YES YES YES YES YES NO YES NO YES NO YES YES NO NO YES NO

II. Compliance Review: 9 21 18 18 21 21 18 21 12 15 18 18 21 21 15 18 12 18 15 21Team 1. Maintained adequate insurance 3 0 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Admin/Team 2. Paid/filed Administrative fee per 6.2.4 3 0 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No YesTeam 3. Submitted monthly M/WBE reports (section 6.2.7) 3 0 No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes YesTeam 4. Submitted monthly reports to the MSP 3 0 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes

Team 5.Submitted required Form B (section 5.16) on a timely

basis(Form 7 - annually May)

3 0 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Team 6. Contractor paid sub-contractors/ Consultants on time (no later than 15 days after payment from OGS)

3 0 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Cust Svc/Team 7. Recertified Vendor Responsibility Questionnaire (section 5.12) & found to be a Responsible Vendor.

3 0 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

III. M/WBE Participation Goals 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 3 3 0 3 3 3 3 3 3

M/WBE 1.Contractor engaged in good faith efforts to meet the

participation goals:MBE 11%, WBE 9%

3 0 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

IV. General Quality 18 18 12 12 18 6 18 18 6 18 12 12 0 18 0 6 18 18 0 12

Team 1. Contractor received 3 or more vendor issue forms in the past 12 months

0 6 No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No

Team 2. Contractor received one vendor issue forms in the past 12 months

0 6 No No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes

Team 3. Contractor has received a satisfaction survey(s) for less than 70 points in the past 12 months

0 6 No No No No No Yes No No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No

18

21

3

18

Page 12: s.s .. . on.d. . CeC.online.ogs.ny.gov/purchase/snt/awardnotes/7301222439AllYearsFi… · VR Review 1. Maintained adequate insurance 3 0 YES YES YES YES YES YES YES NO YES YES YES

YEAR 6HBITS PERFOMANCE

EVALUATION RESULTS

Artech

Inform

ation Sy

stems

CMA Consultin

g Servi

ces

Computer Tech

nology Se

rvice

s

GCom Softw

are Inc.

Genesys Consu

lting S

ervice

s Inc.

IIT In

c.

InfoPeople Corp

Knowledge Build

ers Inc.

Logic

House Lt

d.

MVP Consultin

g Plus I

nc.

NTT Data Inc.

Precision Task

Group In

c.

PSI Internatio

nal Inc.

RMS Computer C

orp

Softw

are People

Syste

m Edge (U

S) LLC

Tempositions I

nc. d/b

/a Compuforce

Universa

l Tech

nologies L

LC

US Tech

V Group In

c.

SCORETotal TO's Cumulative Score: YES NO 73.00 70.00 82.00 73.00 100.00 84.63 97.00 99.94 58.32 78.70 81.13 67.00 75.29 78.38 52.49 85.00 67.00 79.00 60.59 85.00

V. Administration 3 (3) 9 9 9 9 9 9 (9) 3 9 3 3 9 (9) 9 3 9 (3) 9

Team 1. Contractor submitted monthly reports to the MSP past the required 15 days from the last day of the month

(3) 3 Yes No No No No No No No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes No Yes No Yes No

Invoicing Team 2.Contractor's invoices were submitted to OGS past the

required fifteen days from the last day of the month of completed work

(3) 3 No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No Yes No

Invoicing Team 3.

Contractor's invoices were inaccurate on two or more occasions based on a comparison of the submitted invoices with the monthly report published by the

database

(3) 3 No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No

VI. Payment of Consultant Hourly Wage Rate 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

Team 1.In the past 12 months, contractor was found in ONE

instance to have not paid a consultant the Hourly Wage Rate within the slight deviation

0 3 No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No

Team 2.In the past 12 months, contractor was found in TWO OR MORE instances to have not paid a consultant the Hourly

Wage Rate within the slight deviation0 3 No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No

PART II:Authorized User Evaluation 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 21.63 25.00 24.94 22.32 24.70 18.13 25.00 24.29 24.38 19.49 25.00 25.00 25.00 21.59 25.00

Average (row 4) 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 86.52 100.00 99.76 89.29 98.80 72.50 100.00 97.16 97.50 77.95 100.00 100.00 100.00 86.36 100.00Total Count (row 2) 1 2 1 1 2 23 1 21 7 25 8 0 51 2 22 4 0 0 11 1Low Score (row 3) Low 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 15.00 100.00 95.00 25.00 70.00 10.00 100.00 40.00 95.00 0.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 50.00 100.00

6

25

9