Top Banner
BETINA SZKUDLAREK Spinning the Web of Reentry [Re]connecting reentry training theory and practice
214

Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

Mar 20, 2016

Download

Documents

Reentry transition has often been documented as potentially being the most challenging phase of the international transition cycle. Moreover, while the expatriating individuals are thoroughly prepared for their international sojourn, the returning individuals and their organizations rarely expect any adjustment difficulties upon reentry. This trend of underplaying the difficulties of reentry translates directly into the quantity and quality of available repatriation support practices and empirical research addressing them. This dissertation directly tackles this issue.
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

BETINA SZKUDLAREK

Spinning the Web of Reentry[Re]connecting reentry training theory and practice

Rotterdam School of ManagementErasmus University Erasmus School of EconomicsP.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam The Netherlands

Tel. +31 10 408 11 82Fax +31 10 408 96 40E-mail [email protected] www.erim.eur.nl

BE

TIN

A S

ZK

UD

LAR

EK

- S

pin

nin

g th

e W

eb

of R

ee

ntry

ERIM PhD SeriesResearch in Management

Era

smu

s R

ese

arc

h I

nst

itu

te o

f M

an

ag

em

en

t-

ER

IM

143

ER

IM

De

sig

n &

la

you

t: B

&T

On

twe

rp e

n a

dvi

es

(w

ww

.b-e

n-t

.nl)

Pri

nt:

Ha

vek

a

(w

ww

.ha

vek

a.n

l)SPINNING THE WEB OF REENTRY

[Re]connecting reentry training theory and practice

Reentry transition has often been documented as potentially being the mostchallenging phase of the international transition cycle. Moreover, while the expatriatingindividuals are thoroughly prepared for their international sojourn, the returningindividuals and their organizations rarely expect any adjustment difficulties upon reentry.This trend of underplaying the difficulties of reentry translates directly into the quantityand quality of available repatriation support practices and empirical research addressingthem.

This dissertation directly tackles this issue. To begin with, a comprehensive analysis ofthe field of cross-cultural reentry training is presented by means of two distinctivetheoretical streams, after which a number of recommendations related to the training’sdesign and execution are introduced. Furthermore, the issues related to the ethics andpolitics going on behind the scenes of HRM practices are exposed and directly challenged.

On the theoretical level, the twofold examination undertaken in this study leads toacknowledging two important factors. Firstly, the distal approach to organizations isinsufficient for comprehending their complexity. Secondly, only analysing the content-related aspects limits our possibilities for fully understanding of organizational practices.Consequently, this dissertation advocates a proximal, processual approach to conductingempirical studies as an alternative for the existing, often oversimplified research accounts.

ERIM

The Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM) is the Research School (Onder -zoek school) in the field of management of the Erasmus University Rotterdam. The foundingparticipants of ERIM are Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University (RSM), andthe Erasmus School of Econo mics (ESE). ERIM was founded in 1999 and is officially accre -dited by the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW). The research under -taken by ERIM is focussed on the management of the firm in its environment, its intra- andinterfirm relations, and its busi ness processes in their interdependent connections.

The objective of ERIM is to carry out first rate research in manage ment, and to offer anad vanced doctoral pro gramme in Research in Management. Within ERIM, over three hundredsenior researchers and PhD candidates are active in the different research pro grammes.From a variety of acade mic backgrounds and expertises, the ERIM commu nity is united instriving for excellence and working at the fore front of creating new business knowledge.

Erim - 08 omslag Szkudlarek :Erim omslag Szkudlarek 02-09-2008 11:28 Pagina 1 B&T28512 - ERIM Omslag Sckudlarek

Page 2: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

1

Page 3: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

2

Page 4: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

3

Page 5: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

4

Page 6: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

5

Page 7: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

6

Page 8: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

7

Page 9: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

8

Page 10: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

9

Page 11: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

10

Page 12: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

11

Page 13: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

12

Page 14: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

13

Page 15: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

14

Page 16: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

15

Page 17: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

16

Page 18: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

17

Page 19: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

18

Page 20: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

19

Page 21: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

20

Page 22: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

21

Page 23: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

22

Page 24: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

23

• • • • • • • • • • • •

Page 25: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

24

Page 26: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

25

Page 27: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

26

Page 28: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

27

Page 29: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

28

Page 30: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

29

Page 31: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

30

Page 32: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

31

Page 33: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

32

Page 34: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

33

Page 35: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

34

Page 36: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

35

Page 37: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

36

Page 38: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

37

Page 39: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

38

Page 40: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

39

Page 41: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

40

Page 42: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

41

Page 43: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

42

Page 44: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

43

Page 45: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

44

Page 46: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

45

Page 47: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

46

Page 48: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

47

Page 49: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

48

Page 50: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

49

Page 51: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

50

Page 52: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

51

Page 53: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

52

Page 54: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

53

Page 55: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

54

Page 56: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

55

Page 57: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

56

Page 58: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

57

Page 59: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

58

Page 60: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

59

Page 61: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

60

Page 62: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

61

Page 63: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

62

Page 64: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

63

Page 65: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

64

Page 66: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

65

Page 67: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

66

Page 68: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

67

Page 69: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

68

-

-

Page 70: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

69

Page 71: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

70

Page 72: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

71

Page 73: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

72

Page 74: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

73

Page 75: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

74

Page 76: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

75

Page 77: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

76

Page 78: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

77

Page 79: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

78

Page 80: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

79

Page 81: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

80

Page 82: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

81

Page 83: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

82

Page 84: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

83

Page 85: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

84

Page 86: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

85

Page 87: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

86

Page 88: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

87

Page 89: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

88

Page 90: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

89

Page 91: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

90

Page 92: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

91

Page 93: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

92

Page 94: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

93

Page 95: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

94

Page 96: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

95

Page 97: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

96

Page 98: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

97

Page 99: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

98

Page 100: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

99

Page 101: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

100

Page 102: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

101

Page 103: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

102

Page 104: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

103

Page 105: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

104

Page 106: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

105

Page 107: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

106

Page 108: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

107

Page 109: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

108

Page 110: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

109

Page 111: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

110

Page 112: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

111

Page 113: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

112

Page 114: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

113

Page 115: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

114

Page 116: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

115

Page 117: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

116

Page 118: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

117

Page 119: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

118

Page 120: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

119

Page 121: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

120

Page 122: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

121

Page 123: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

122

Page 124: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

123

Page 125: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

124

Page 126: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

125

Page 127: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

126

Page 128: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

127

Page 129: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

128

Page 130: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

129

Page 131: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

130

Page 132: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

131

Page 133: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

132

Page 134: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

133

Page 135: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

134

Page 136: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

135

Page 137: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

136

Page 138: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

137

Page 139: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

138

Page 140: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

139

Page 141: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

140

Page 142: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

141

Page 143: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

142

Page 144: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

143

Page 145: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

144

Page 146: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

145

Page 147: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

146

Page 148: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

147

Page 149: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

148

Page 150: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

149

Page 151: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

150

Page 152: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

151

Page 153: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

152

Page 154: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

153

Reflections – reopening the box of reentry training 143

(such as a reentry trainer). This happens through a process of translation, when

interests are shaped and problematic issues defined. These issues might take a form,

which benefits mostly one of the involved parties. This dissertation could be therefore

seen as a cautionary tale. The black box of offered services should be reopened and its

contents carefully analyzed. This of course requires additional work from the managers,

but is of particular importance, especially in light of the fact that the managers

themselves could, through a process of re-cycling, become the promoters of

questionable projects.

On the other hand, this dissertation advocates an ethically centred approach to HR

management. The manager’s responsibility is far larger than merely concern for the

well-being of the organization. Consequently, through revealing often morally

questionable decisions, this research project calls for attention to the wellbeing and

protection of employees. Behind the empty promise of HR support, the managers

should not hide the opportunistic benefits gained by the company. Return on

investment should become a secondary goal in planning supportive measures for

employees.

7.3 Methodological reflection

Extensive methodological reflections rarely become the main concern of empirical

investigations. Within the researched area, little attention has been given to

determining adequate methods of ‘reentry training’. The dominance of psychological,

literature-driven, deductive investigations is incontestable. Repatriate readjustment

processes and, occasionally, limited aspects of organizational interests come back in

reentry writings. Consequently, the manuscripts produced oscillate between limited

areas of research predefined in earlier writings within the same or closely related

domains. The questions we ask predefine the range of answers we get. Thus, a closed

loop of empirical inquiry might limit researchers’ ability to move beyond the already

established ‘facts’ and ways of looking at the research object.

This research project started with a similar outlook. The questions asked were

predefined along the lines of existing reentry theory. Yet, the initial answers gathered

did not make sense within the theoretical framework of reentry transition.

Consequently, instead of trying to create a forced fit within the existing theoretical

structures, this investigation explored unknown avenues, driven by an evolving plot of

events. By asking questions about issues which were not considered to be relevant in

previous research, this dissertation opens up new avenues for investigating reentry and

related areas. This processual orientation, focused on contextual aspects of reentry

transition and its dynamics, exposes elements without which an analysis of reentry will

Page 155: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

154

144 Chapter 7

always remain incomplete or perhaps even irrelevant. The taken-for-granted aspects of

setting up and executing reentry training have been reopened. Moreover, by addressing

these questions to groups other than individuals in transition or HR managers, this study

provides insights so far unaddressed within the reentry field.

Does this mean that we need to discard current reentry research practices as

inappropriate and obsolete? Definitely not. However, while they are a valuable source

of information and inspiration, they should not become restrictive factors in future

empirical investigations. An analysis of the micro-practices of reentry goes hand in hand

with macro-theories of reentry transition. Asking questions predefined in the reentry

literature should not prevent the researcher from performing a micro-analysis of the

contextual circumstances in which the training takes place. I want to support Martin’s

ambition of “breaking up the mono-method monopolies” (Martin, 1990: 30). The author

argues that by dogmatically following a one-method approach, a researcher gets locked

into the weaknesses related to a particular methodological choice. Consequently,

staying loyal to one, and only one approach will result in a number of oversights

inherent to a specific method. The bridging of reentry theory with reentry practice is a

method this dissertation advocates. Such bridging allows the researcher to benefit from

existing accounts, yet it consents to staying open to new, unanticipated turns of events.

This research project followed the path outlined by the Actor-Network Theory. There

are other avenues that could be explored. However, one important lesson we can learn

from this stream of work is to “follow the actors” (Callon, 1986a) and try to understand

their world from within, rather than analyze their realities through imposed categories.

These methodological considerations are crucial in relation to the theoretical products

of academic labour. Accordingly, the next section of this chapter deals with the theory-

related outcomes of this investigation.

7.4 Theoretical reflection

The theoretical reflections stemming from this research are twofold. First of all, each of

the parts constitutes a different theoretical contribution; both challenge different, basic

assumptions from within their own theoretical streams. Secondly, the two parts

together offer an attractive avenue worth exploring within management research.

7.4.1 Part 1 – theory revisited

The first part of this dissertation examines several important issues. First of all, in

Chapter 3, I reveal the fragmentary nature of intercultural reentry research and the

Page 156: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

155

Page 157: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

156

Page 158: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

157

Page 159: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

158

Page 160: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

159

Page 161: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

160

Page 162: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

161

Page 163: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

162

Page 164: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

163

Page 165: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

164

Page 166: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

165

Page 167: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

166

Page 168: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

167

Page 169: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

168

Page 170: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

169

Page 171: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

170

Page 172: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

171

Page 173: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

172

Page 174: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

173

Page 175: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

174

Page 176: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

175

Page 177: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

176

Page 178: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

177

Page 179: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

178

Page 180: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

179

Page 181: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

180

Page 182: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

181

Page 183: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

182

Page 184: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

183

References 173

Osborne, T. & Rose, N. (1999). Do the Social Sciences Create Phenomena? The Example

of Public Opinion Research. British Journal of Sociology, 50, 367–96.

Osland, J. (2000), The Journey Inward: Expatriate Hero Tales and Paradoxes. Human

Resource Management, 39 (2&3), 227-238.

O'Sullivan, S. (2002). The protean approach to managing repatriation transitions.

International Journal of Manpower, 23(7), 597–616.

Ozkan, B. C. (2004). Using NVivo to Analyze Qualitative Classroom Data on Constructivist

Learning Environments. The Qualitative Report, 9 (4), 589-603.

Paik, Y., Segaud, B., & Malinowski, C. (2002). How to improve repatriation management:

are motivations and expectations congruent between the company and expatriates?

International Journal of Manpower, 23 (7), 635–648.

Pascoe R., (2000) ‘Homeward Bound’ Expatriate Press. Seattle

Patton, M.Q. (1987) How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. California: Sage

Patton, M. Q. (1990): Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 2nd edition.

Newbury Park: Sage.

Pollock, D.C. and Van Reken, R.E. (1999). The Third Culture Kid Experience: Growing up

among Worlds. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.

Peltonen, T. (1997). Facing the Rankings from the Past: A Tournament Perspective on

Repatriate Career Mobility. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 8

(1), 106–23.

Ptak, C.L., Cooper, J. & Brislin, R. (1995). Cross-cultural training programs: Advice and

insights from experienced trainers. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 19,

425–453.

Pusch, M. D. (1998). Going home: Styles of Reentry. in Donal Lynch, Adrian Pilbeam and

Philip O'Connor, Heritage and Progress, from conference proceedings, SIETAR-Europa

Conference, Bath, England.

Page 185: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

184

Page 186: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

185

Page 187: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

186

176

Sussman, N. M. (1986). Re-entry research and training: Methods and implications.

International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10, 235-254.

Sussman, N. M. (2000). The dynamic nature of cultural identity throughout cultural

transitions: Why home is not so sweet. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4,

355–373.

Sussman, N. M. (2001). Repatriation transitions: psychological preparedness, cultural

identity, and attributions among American managers. International Journal of

Intercultural Relations, 25 (2), 109-123.

Sussman, N.M. (2002). Testing the cultural identity model of the cultural transition

cycle: sojourners return home. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 26, 391-

408.

Suutari, V., & Brewster, C. (2003). Repatriation: empirical evidence from a longitudinal

study of careers and expectations among Finnish expatriates. The International Journal

of Human Resource Management, 14(7), 1132-1151.

Suutari, V., & Välimaa, K. (2002). Antecedents of repatriation adjustment: new evidence

from Finnish repatriates, International Journal of Manpower, 23(7), 617-634.

Szkudlarek, B. (2005). Influence of cross-cultural re-entry training on repatriate’s

experiences related to re-entry cultural shock. Unpublished PhD Research Proposal,

Erasmus Research Institute of Management.

Szkudlarek, B. & Magala, S. (2008). The West, the Rest, and Ethics: Re-legitimizing

intercultural training. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting

in Anaheim, USA.

Thompson, C. (2002). When Elephants Stand for Competing Philosophies of Nature:

Amboseli National Park, Kenya. In Law, J. & Mol, A. (eds.), Complexities. Social Studies of

Knowledge Practices, Duke University Press.

Thompson, C.L., & Christofi, V. (2006). Can You Go Home Again? A Phenomenological

Investigation of Cypriot Students Returning Home After Studying Abroad. International

Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 28 (1), 21-39.

Triandis, H.C. (1989). The Self and Social Behavior in Differing Cultural Contexts.

Psychological Review, 96(3), 506-520.

Page 188: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

187

Page 189: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

188

Page 190: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

189

Page 191: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

190

Page 192: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

191

Page 193: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

192

Page 194: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

193

Page 195: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

194

Page 196: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

195

Page 197: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

196

Page 198: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

197

Page 199: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

198

Page 200: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

199

Page 201: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

200

Page 202: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

201

Page 203: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

202

Page 204: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

203

Page 205: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

204

Page 206: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

205

Page 207: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

206

Page 208: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

207

Page 209: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

208

Page 210: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

209

Page 211: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

210

Page 212: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

211

Page 213: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

212

Page 214: Spinning the Web of Reentry: (Re)connecting Reentry Training Theory and Practice

BETINA SZKUDLAREK

Spinning the Web of Reentry[Re]connecting reentry training theory and practice

Rotterdam School of ManagementErasmus University Erasmus School of EconomicsP.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam The Netherlands

Tel. +31 10 408 11 82Fax +31 10 408 96 40E-mail [email protected] www.erim.eur.nl

BE

TIN

A S

ZK

UD

LAR

EK

- S

pin

nin

g th

e W

eb

of R

ee

ntry

ERIM PhD SeriesResearch in Management

Era

smu

s R

ese

arc

h I

nst

itu

te o

f M

an

ag

em

en

t-

ER

IM

143

ER

IM

De

sig

n &

la

you

t: B

&T

On

twe

rp e

n a

dvi

es

(w

ww

.b-e

n-t

.nl)

Pri

nt:

Ha

vek

a

(w

ww

.ha

vek

a.n

l)SPINNING THE WEB OF REENTRY

[Re]connecting reentry training theory and practice

Reentry transition has often been documented as potentially being the mostchallenging phase of the international transition cycle. Moreover, while the expatriatingindividuals are thoroughly prepared for their international sojourn, the returningindividuals and their organizations rarely expect any adjustment difficulties upon reentry.This trend of underplaying the difficulties of reentry translates directly into the quantityand quality of available repatriation support practices and empirical research addressingthem.

This dissertation directly tackles this issue. To begin with, a comprehensive analysis ofthe field of cross-cultural reentry training is presented by means of two distinctivetheoretical streams, after which a number of recommendations related to the training’sdesign and execution are introduced. Furthermore, the issues related to the ethics andpolitics going on behind the scenes of HRM practices are exposed and directly challenged.

On the theoretical level, the twofold examination undertaken in this study leads toacknowledging two important factors. Firstly, the distal approach to organizations isinsufficient for comprehending their complexity. Secondly, only analysing the content-related aspects limits our possibilities for fully understanding of organizational practices.Consequently, this dissertation advocates a proximal, processual approach to conductingempirical studies as an alternative for the existing, often oversimplified research accounts.

ERIM

The Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM) is the Research School (Onder -zoek school) in the field of management of the Erasmus University Rotterdam. The foundingparticipants of ERIM are Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University (RSM), andthe Erasmus School of Econo mics (ESE). ERIM was founded in 1999 and is officially accre -dited by the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW). The research under -taken by ERIM is focussed on the management of the firm in its environment, its intra- andinterfirm relations, and its busi ness processes in their interdependent connections.

The objective of ERIM is to carry out first rate research in manage ment, and to offer anad vanced doctoral pro gramme in Research in Management. Within ERIM, over three hundredsenior researchers and PhD candidates are active in the different research pro grammes.From a variety of acade mic backgrounds and expertises, the ERIM commu nity is united instriving for excellence and working at the fore front of creating new business knowledge.

Erim - 08 omslag Szkudlarek :Erim omslag Szkudlarek 02-09-2008 11:28 Pagina 1 B&T28512 - ERIM Omslag Sckudlarek