Top Banner
Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 1 Copyright © 2001 Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II ME 22.403 Mechanical Lab II Basics of Spectrum Analysis/Measurements and the FFT Analyzer
50
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 1 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    ME 22.403 Mechanical Lab II

    Basics ofSpectrum Analysis/Measurements

    andthe FFT Analyzer

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 2 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    Many times a transformation is performed to provide a better orclearer understanding of a phenomena. The time representationof a sine wave may be difficult to interpret. By using a Fourierseries representation, the original time signal can be easilytransformed and much better understood.

    Transformations are also performedto respresent the same data withsignificantly less information.Notice that the original time signalwas defined by many discrete timepoints (ie, 1024, 2048, 4096 )whereas the equivalent Fourierrepresentation only requires 4amplitudes and 4 frequencies.

    Transformation of Time to Frequency

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 3 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    The FFT Analyzer can be broken downinto several pieces which involve thedigitization, filtering, transformationand processing of a signal.

    Several items are important here: Digitization and Sampling Quantization of Signal Aliasing Effects Leakage Distortion Windows Weighting Functions The Fourier Transform Measurement Formulation

    DISPLAY ADC

    ANALOG SIGNAL

    ANALOG FILTER

    DIGITAL FILTER

    DISCRETE DATA

    FFT

    The Anatomy of the FFT Analyzer

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 4 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    Actual time signals

    INPUT OUTPUT

    OUTPUT INPUT

    FREQUENCY RESPONSE FUNCTION COHERENCE FUNCTION

    ANTIALIASING FILTERS

    ADC DIGITIZES SIGNALS

    INPUT OUTPUT

    ANALOG SIGNALS

    APPLY WINDOWS

    COMPUTE FFT LINEAR SPECTRA

    AUTORANGE ANALYZER

    AVERAGING OF SAMPLES

    INPUT/OUTPUT/CROSS POWER SPECTRA COMPUTATION OF AVERAGED

    INPUT SPECTRUM

    LINEAR OUTPUT

    SPECTRUM

    LINEAR

    INPUT

    SPECTRUM POWER

    OUTPUT

    SPECTRUM POWER CROSS

    SPECTRUM POWER

    COMPUTATION OF FRF AND COHERENCE

    Analog anti-alias filter

    Digitized time signals

    Windowed time signals

    Compute FFT of signal

    Average auto/cross spectra

    Compute FRF and Coherence

    The Anatomy of the FFT Process

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 5 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    ALIASED SIGNAL

    ACTUAL SIGNAL

    Aliasing results when the sampling does not occur fast enough.

    Sampling must occur faster than twice the highest frequency to bemeasured in the data - sampling of 10 to 20 times the signal issufficient for most time representations of varying signals

    However, in order to accurately represent a signal in thefrequency domain, sampling need only occur at greater than twicethe frequency of interest

    Anti-aliasing filters are used to prevent aliasing

    These are typically Low Pass Analog Filters

    Aliasing (Wrap-Around Error)

    OBSERVED ACTUAL

    f max

    WRAP-AROUND

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 6 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    Anti-aliasing filters are typically specified with a cut-offfrequency. The roll-off of the filter will determine how quicklythe signal will be attenuated and is specified in dB/octave

    FILTER ROLLOFF

    f c

    in

    out1010dB V

    Vlog20Glog20G ==

    The cut-off frequency is usually specified at the 3 dB down point(which is where the filter attenuates 3 dB of signal).

    Butterworth, Chebyshev, elliptic, Bessel are common filters

    Anti-Aliasing Filters

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 7 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    Sampling rate of the ADC is specified as a maximum that ispossible. Basically, the digitizer is taking a series of snapshotsat a very fast rate as time progresses

    Analog Signal DigitalRepresentation

    ADC

    Digitization of a Signal

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 8 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    Each sample is spaced delta t seconds apart. Sufficient samplingis needed in order to assure that the entire event is captured.The maximum observable frequency is inversely proportional to thedelta time step used

    Digital Sample

    fmax = 1 / 2 DtRayleigh Criteria

    Dt spacing

    Sampling

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 9 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    In order to extract valid frequency information, digitization of theanalog signal must occur at a certain rate.

    Shannon's Sampling Theorem states fs > 2 fmax

    That is, the sampling rate must be at least twice the desiredfrequency to be measured.

    For a time record of T seconds, the lowest frequency componentmeasurable is DDf = 1 / T

    With these two properties above, the sampling parameters can besummarized as fmax = 1 / 2 DDt

    DDt = 1 / 2 fmax

    Sampling Theory

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 10 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    Sampling Parameters

    T=N t DD

    Due to the Rayleigh Criteria and Shannons Sampling Theorum, thefollowing sampling parameters must be observed.

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 11 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    PICK THEN AND

    DDt fmax = 1 / (2 DDt) T = N DDt

    fmax DDt = 1 / (2 fmax ) DDf = 1/(N DDt)

    DDf T = 1 / DDf DDt = T / N

    T DDf =1 / T fmax = N DDf / 2

    Due to the Rayleigh Criteria and Shannons Sampling Theorum, thefollowing sampling parameters must be observed.

    Sampling Parameters

    If we choose Df = 5 Hz and N = 1024Then T = 1 / Df = 1 / 5 Hz = 0.2 sec

    fs = N Df = (1024) (5 Hz) = 5120 Hzfmax = fs = (5120 Hz) / 2 = 2560 Hz

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 12 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    An inverse relationship between time and frequency exists

    TIME DOMAIN FREQUENCY DOMAIN

    T BW

    Given delta t = .0019531 and N = 1024 time points,then T = 2 sec and BW= 256 Hz and delta f = 0.5 Hz

    TIME DOMAIN FREQUENCY DOMAIN

    BWTGiven delta t = .000976563 and N = 1024 time points,then T = 1sec sec and BW = 512 Hz and delta f = 1 Hz

    TIME DOMAIN FREQUENCY DOMAIN

    BWTGiven delta t = .0019531 and N = 512 time points,then T = 1 sec and BW = 256 Hz and delta f = 1 Hz

    Sampling Relationship

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 13 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    Sampling refers to the rate at which the signal is collected.Quantization refers to the amplitude description of the signal.

    A 4 bit ADC has 24 or 16 possible values

    A 6 bit ADC has 26 or 64 possible values

    A 12 bit ADC has 212 or 4096 possible values

    ADC BIT STEPS

    Quantization Error

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 14 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    Quantization errors refer to the accuracy of the amplitudemeasured. The 6 bit ADC represents the signal shown muchbetter than a 4 bit ADC

    A D C

    M A X

    R A

    N G E

    A D C

    M A X

    R A

    N G E

    Quantization Error

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 15 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    Underloading of the ADC causes amplitude errors in the signal

    All of the availabledynamic range of theanalog to digitalconverter is not usedeffectively

    0.5 volt signal

    This causes amplitudeand phase distortionof the measuredsignal in both the timeand frequency domains

    10 voltrangeon

    ADC

    Quantization Error

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 16 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    A large DC bias can cause amplitude errors in the alternating partof the signal. AC coupling uses a high pass filter to remove theDC component from the signal

    All of the availabledynamic range of theanalog to digitalconverter is dominatedby the DC signal

    The alternating part ofthe signal suffers fromquantization error

    This causes amplitudeand phase distortion ofthe measured signal

    10 voltrangeon

    ADC

    AC Coupling

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 17 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    Overloading of the ADC causes severe errors also

    The ADC range is settoo low for the signalto be measured andcauses clipping of thesignal

    1.5 volt signal

    This causes amplitudeand phase distortionof the measuredsignal in both the timeand frequency domains

    1 voltrangeon

    ADC

    A D C

    M A X

    R A

    N G

    E

    Clipping and Overloading

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 18 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    The Fourier Transform

    +

    -

    p-= dte)t(x)f(S ft2jx

    +

    -

    p= dfe)f(S)t(x ft2jx

    and Inverse Fourier Transform

    Forward Fourier Transform

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 19 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    Discrete Fourier TransformEven though the actual time signal is continuous, the signal isdiscretized and the transformation at discrete points is

    +

    -

    Dp-=D dte)t(x)fm(S tfm2jx

    This integral is evaluated as

    However, if only a finite sample is available (which is generally thecase), then the transformation becomes

    +

    -=

    DDp-DDDn

    tnfm2jx e)tn(xt)fm(S

    -

    =

    DDp-DDD1N

    0n

    tnfm2jx e)tn(xt)fm(S

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 20 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    T

    ACTUAL

    DATA

    CAPTURED

    DATA

    RECONTRUCTED

    DATA

    Fourier Transform and FFT

    Actual TimeSignal

    Captured TimeSignal

    ReconstructedTime Signal

    Frequency Spectrum

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 21 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    T

    ACTUAL

    DATA

    CAPTURED

    DATA

    RECONTRUCTED

    DATA

    Fourier Transform and FFT

    Actual TimeSignal

    Captured TimeSignal

    ReconstructedTime Signal

    Frequency Spectrum

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 22 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    Leakage

    T

    ACTUAL

    DATA

    CAPTURED

    DATA

    RECONTRUCTED

    DATA

    T

    ACTUAL

    DATA

    CAPTURED

    DATA

    RECONTRUCTED

    DATA

    T

    TIME

    FREQ

    UENCY

    Periodic Signal

    Non-Periodic Signal

    Leakage due tosignal distortion

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 23 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    Leakage

    When the measured signal is not periodic in the sample interval,incorrect estimates of the amplitude and frequency occur. Thiserror is referred to as leakage.

    Basically, the actual energy distribution is smeared across thefrequency spectrum and energy leaks from a particular DDf intoadjacent DDf s.

    Leakage is probably the most common and most serious digitalsignal processing error. Unlike aliasing, the effects of leakagecan not be eliminated.

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 24 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    Windows - Minimize LeakageIn order to better satisfy the periodicity requirement of the FFTprocess, time weighting functions, called windows, are used.Essentially, these weighting functions attempt to heavily weight thebeginning and end of the sample record to zero - the middle of thesample is heavily weighted towards unity

    T

    ACTUAL

    DATA

    CAPTURED

    DATA

    RECONTRUCTED

    DATA

    T

    ACTUAL

    DATA

    CAPTURED

    DATA

    RECONTRUCTED

    DATA

    TIME

    FREQ

    UENCY

    Periodic Signal

    Non-Periodic Signal

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 25 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    Windows - Rectangular/Hanning/FlattopIn order to better satisfy the periodicity requirement of the FFTprocess, time weighting functions, called windows, are used.Essentially, these weighting functions attempt to heavily weight thebeginning and end of the sample record to zero - the middle of thesample is heavilty weighted towards unity

    RectangularRectangular - Unity gain applied to entire sample interval; thiswindow can have up to 36% amplitude error if the signal is notperiodic in the sample interval; good for signals that inherentlysatisfy the periodicity requirement of the FFT process

    HanningHanning - Cosine bell shaped weighting which heavily weights thebeginning and end of the sample interval to zero; this window canhave up to 16% amplitude error; the main frequency will showsome adjacent side band frequencies but then quickly attenuates;good for general purpose signal applications

    Flat TopFlat Top - Multi-sine weighting function; this window has excellentamplitude characteristics (0.1% error) but very poor frequencyresolution; very good for calibration purposes with discrete sine

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 26 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    Windows - Rectangular/Hanning/Flattop

    Time weighting functionsare applied to minimizethe effects of leakage

    Rectangular

    Hanning

    Flat Top

    and many others

    Windows DO NOT eliminate leakage !!!

    AMPLITUDE

    ROLLOFF

    WIDTH

    General windowfrequency characteristics

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 27 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    Windows - Rectangular

    -16 15.9375-10 0 10-14 -12 -8 -6 -4 -2 2 4 6 8 12 14-100

    0

    -70

    - 90

    - 80

    -60

    -50

    -40

    -30

    -20

    -10

    dB

    Amplitude

    -3 -2 -1 0 1 2-2.5 -1.5 -0.5 0.5 1.5 2.5

    The rectangular window function is shown below. The main lobe is narrow, but the side lobes are very largeand roll off quite slowly. The main lobe is quite rounded and can introduce large measurement errors. Therectangular window can have amplitude errors as large as 36%.

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 28 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    Amplitude

    -3 -2 -1 0 1 2-2.5 -1.5 -0.5 0.5 1.5 2.5-16 15.9375-10 0 10-14 -12 -8 -6 -4 -2 2 4 6 8 12 14-100

    0

    -70

    - 90

    - 80

    -60

    -50

    -40

    -30

    -20

    -10

    dB

    The hanning window function is shown below. The first few side lobes are rather large, but a 60 dB/octaveroll-off rate is helpful. This window is most useful for searching operations where good frequencyresolution is needed, but amplitude accuracy is not important; the hanning window will have amplitude errorsof as much as 16%.

    Windows - Hanning

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 29 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    Amplitude

    -3 -2 -1 0 1 2-2.5 -1.5 -0.5 0.5 1.5 2.5-16 15.9375-10 0 10-14 -12 -8 -6 -4 -2 2 4 6 8 12 14-100

    0

    -70

    - 90

    - 80

    -60

    -50

    -40

    -30

    -20

    -10

    dB

    The flat top window function is shown below. The main lobe is very flat and spreads over several frequencybins. While this window suffers from frequency resolution, the amplitude can be measured very accuratelyto 0.1%.

    Windows - Flat Top

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 30 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    Windows

    -16 15.9375-10 0 10-14 -12 -8 -6 -4 -2 2 4 6 8 12 14-100

    0

    -70

    - 90

    - 80

    -60

    -50

    -40

    -30

    -20

    -10

    dB

    -16 15.9375-10 0 10-14 -12 -8 -6 -4 -2 2 4 6 8 12 14-100

    0

    -70

    - 90

    - 80

    -60

    -50

    -40

    -30

    -20

    -10

    dB

    -16 15.9375-10 0 10-14 -12 -8 -6 -4 -2 2 4 6 8 12 14-100

    0

    -70

    - 90

    - 80

    -60

    -50

    -40

    -30

    -20

    -10

    dB

    Rectangular Hanning Flat Top

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 31 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    Windows - Force/Exponential for Impact TestingSpecial windows are used for impact testing

    Forcewindow

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 32 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    Windows - Force/Exponential for Impact TestingSpecial windows are used for impact testing

    Exponentialwindow

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 33 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    Hammer Tips for Impact Testing

    Real

    -976.5625us 123.9624ms

    dB Mag

    0Hz 6.4kHz

    METAL TIP

    TIME PULSE

    FREQUENCY SPECTRUM

    TIME PULSE

    FREQUENCY SPECTRUM

    Real

    -976.5625us 123.9624ms

    dB Mag

    0Hz 6.4kHz

    HARD PLASTIC TIP

    TIME PULSE

    FREQUENCY SPECTRUM

    Real

    -976.5625us 123.9624ms

    dB Mag

    0Hz 6.4kHz

    SOFT PLASTIC TIP

    TIME PULSE

    FREQUENCY SPECTRUM

    Real

    -976.5625us 123.9624ms

    dB Mag

    0Hz 6.4kHz

    RUBBER TIP

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 34 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    Pretrigger Delay and Double Impacts

    NO PRETRIGGER USED

    PRETRIGGER SPECIFIED

    t = 0

    t = 0

    DOUBLE IMPACT

    TIME PULSE

    FREQUENCY SPECTRUM

    Real

    -976.5625us 998.53516ms

    dB Mag

    0Hz 800Hz

    DOUBLE IMPACT

    TIME PULSE

    FREQUENCY SPECTRUM

    Real

    -976.5625us 998.53516ms

    dB Mag

    0Hz 800Hz

    Pretrigger delay used toreduce the amount offrequency spectrum distortion

    Double impacts should be avoided due tothe distortion of the frequency spectrumand force dropout that can occur

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 35 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    Exponential Window

    If the signal does notnaturally decay within thesample interval, then anexponentially decaying windowmay be necessary.

    However, many times changingthe signal processingparameters such as bandwidthand number of spectral linesmay produce a signal whichrequires less window weighting T = N t DD

    T = N t DD

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 36 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    Measurement - Linear Spectra

    SYSTEMINPUT OUTPUT

    x(t) h(t) y(t)

    Sx(f) H(f) Sy(f)

    x(t) - time domain input to the system

    y(t) - time domain output to the system

    Sx(f) - linear Fourier spectrum of x(t)

    Sy(f) - linear Fourier spectrum of y(t)

    H(f) - system transfer function

    h(t) - system impulse response

    TIME

    FREQUENCY

    FFT & IFT

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 37 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    Measurement - Linear Spectra

    +

    -

    p= dfe)f(S)t(x ft2jx

    +

    -

    p= dfe)f(S)t(y ft2jy

    +

    -

    p= dfe)f(H)t(h ft2j

    +

    -

    p-= dte)t(x)f(S ft2jx

    +

    -

    p-= dte)t(y)f(S ft2jy

    +

    -

    p-= dte)t(h)f(H ft2j

    Note: Sx and Sy are complex valued functions

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 38 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    Measurement - Power Spectra

    SYSTEMINPUT OUTPUT

    TIME

    FREQUENCY

    FFT & IFT

    Rxx(t) Ryx(t) Ryy(t)

    Gxx(f) Gxy(f) Gyy(f)

    Rxx(t) - autocorrelation of the input signal x(t)

    Ryy(t) - autocorrelation of the output signal y(t)

    Ryx(t) - cross correlation of y(t) and x(t)

    Gxx(f) - autopower spectrum of x(t) G f S f S fxx x x( ) ( ) ( )*=

    Gyy(f) - autopower spectrum of y(t) G f S f S fyy y y( ) ( ) ( )*=

    Gyx(f) - cross power spectrum of y(t) and x(t) G f S f S fyx y x( ) ( ) ( )*=

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 39 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    Measurement - Power Spectra

    )f(S)f(Sde)(R)f(G

    dt)t(x)t(yT1

    Tlim

    )]t(x),t(y[E)(R

    )f(S)f(Sde)(R)f(G

    dt)t(y)t(yT1

    Tlim

    )]t(y),t(y[E)(R

    )f(S)f(Sde)(R)f(G

    dt)t(x)t(xT1

    Tlim

    )]t(x),t(x[E)(R

    *xy

    ft2jyxyx

    Tyx

    *yy

    ft2jyyyy

    Tyy

    *xx

    ft2jxxxx

    Txx

    =tt=

    t+

    =t+=t

    =tt=

    t+

    =t+=t

    =tt=

    t+

    =t+=t

    +

    -

    p-

    +

    -

    p-

    +

    -

    p-

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 40 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    xy SHS =H1 formulation

    - susceptible to noise on the input- underestimates the actual H of the system

    *xx

    *xy SSHSS =

    xx

    yx*xx

    *xy

    G

    G

    SS

    SSH =

    =

    2

    1

    xyyy

    xxyx*yy

    *xx

    *yx

    *xy2

    xy HH

    G/G

    G/G

    )SS)(SS(

    )SS)(SS(==

    =g

    COHERENCE

    Otherformulationsfor H exist

    The Frequency Response Function and Coherence

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 41 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    12 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls LaboratoryMeasurement Definitions

    Measurements - Auto Power Spectrum

    INPUT FORCE

    AVERAGED INPUT

    POWER SPECTRUM

    x(t)

    G (f)xx

    OUTPUT RESPONSE

    AVERAGED OUTPUT

    POWER SPECTRUM

    y(t)

    G (f)yy

    13 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls LaboratoryMeasurement Definitions

    Measurements - Cross Power Spectrum

    AVERAGED INPUT

    POWER SPECTRUM

    AVERAGED CROSS

    POWER SPECTRUM

    AVERAGED OUTPUT

    POWER SPECTRUM

    G (f)xx G (f)yy

    G (f)yx

    14 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls LaboratoryMeasurement Definitions

    Measurements - Frequency Response Function

    AVERAGED INPUT

    POWER SPECTRUM

    AVERAGED CROSS

    POWER SPECTRUM

    AVERAGED OUTPUT

    POWER SPECTRUM

    FREQUENCY RESPONSE FUNCTION

    G (f)xx G (f)yyG (f)yx

    H(f)

    15 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls LaboratoryMeasurement Definitions

    Measurements - FRF & Coherence

    Freq Resp

    40

    -60

    dB Mag

    0Hz 200HzAVG: 5

    Coherence1

    0

    Real

    0Hz 200HzAVG: 5

    FREQUENCY RESPONSE FUNCTION

    COHERENCE

    Typical Measurements

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 42 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    Hammers and Tips

    40

    -60

    dB Mag

    0Hz 800Hz

    COHERENCE

    INPUT POWER SPECTRUM

    FRF

    40

    -60

    dB Mag

    0Hz 200Hz

    COHERENCE

    INPUT POWER SPECTRUM

    FRF

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 43 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    Leakage and Windows for Impact Testing

    ACTUAL TIME SIGNAL

    SAMPLED SIGNAL

    WINDOW WEIGHTING

    WINDOWED TIME SIGNAL

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 44 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    Simple time-frequency response relationship

    FORCE

    RESPONSE

    time

    increasing rate of oscillation

    frequency

    WOW !!!

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 45 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    Sine Dwell to Obtain Mode Shape Characteristics

    MODE 1

    MODE 2

    MODE3

    MODE 4

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 46 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    DOF # 1

    DOF #2

    DOF # 3

    MODE # 1

    MODE # 2

    MODE # 3

    Mode Shape Characteristics for a Simple Beam

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 47 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    MODE 1

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    MODE 2

    Mode Shape Characteristics for a Simple Plate

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 48 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    Why and How Do Structures Vibrate?

    INPUT TIME FORCE

    INPUT SPECTRUM

    OUTPUT TIME RESPONSE

    OUTPUT SPECTRUM

    f(t)

    FFT

    y(t)

    IFT

    f(j )ww y(j )wwh(j )ww

    FREQUENCY RESPONSE FUNCTION

    Motor or diskunbalance

    can cause unwantedvibrations or worse

    OOOPS !!!

    OUCH !!!

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 49 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    HP 35660 FFT Dual Channel Analyzer

  • Dr. Peter Avitabile University of Massachusetts Lowell Spectrum Analysis 082702 - 50 Copyright 2001

    Mechanical Engineering - 22.403 ME Lab II

    HP 35660 FFT Dual Channel Analyzer