SOUTH AUSTRALIAN MATERNAL SERUM …...SOUTH AUSTRALIAN MATERNAL SERUM ANTENATAL SCREENING (SAMSAS ©) PROGRAM Robert Cocciolone, Head, Antenatal Screening, WCH Genetics & Molecular

SOUTH AUSTRALIAN MATERNAL SERUM ANTENATAL SCREENING (SAMSAS © ) PROGRAM

Robert Cocciolone,

Head, Antenatal Screening, WCH Genetics & Molecular Pathology

Directorate, SA Pathology

www.wch.sa.gov.au/samsas.html

“ providing obstetric support”

Lyn Raniolo

Renata Bird Khoa Lam

Chris Rothe

Eva MartinGerry Slack

Robert Cocciolone

SOUTH AUSTRALIAN MATERNAL SERUM ANTENATAL SCREENING PROGRAM

(SAMSAS© ) Longest running program in Australia,

-1978 Neural Tube Defect (NTD) screening

-1990/91 Down syndrome & other pregnancy pathologies(15-20wks)

-June 2001 First Trimester Down syndrome screening (10-14wks)

-April 2009 Integrated Testing in Second Trimester (9-20wks)

Develop and manage own software and algorithms

Service SA, TAS, NT with screening service support to PMH in WA

Integrated with Neonatal Screening database

Electronic access to Cytogenetic and Ultrasound reports

Yearly audits published in the SA Birth Defects Register Report

www.wch.sa.gov.au

•Services

•A for Antenatal Screening or

•B for Birth Defects Register

•Google SAMSAS

www.wch.sa.gov.au/samsas.html

Information for

Health Professionals

about Maternal Serum Screening

MSS is offered as a program with access to pre & post test information, genetic counselling and diagnostic services – cvs, amnio & ultrasound.

SAMSAS©

Kit based fluoroimmunoassays ~ DELFIA system

Screening

“the systematic application of a test procedure to identify individuals at sufficient risk to warrant

diagnostic investigations”

• CVS 12 wks

•Amniocentesis 15+wks

•Morphology Ultrasound 18+wks

Aim is to maximise detection of affected pregnanciesand minimise false +ves

SAMSAS©

Markers;

1st Trimester 2nd Trimester Integrated TestAFP AFP

free ββββ hCG free ββββ hCG free ββββ hCGuE3 uE3

Papp-A Papp-ANuchal NuchalTranslucency Translucency

Other Markers; Maternal ageGestational age Other Variables

•Fetus must occupy 3/4 of the image

• Fetus must be in a Neutral position

•Hyperextension of fetal neck can increase the NT b y 0.6 mm

• Flexion of the neck can decrease the NT by 0.4 mm

• Umbilical cord round the fetal neck ( 5 -10% of cas es) can increase the NT by 0.8 mm

•Amniotic membrane and Nuchal membrane must be separate

• Measure the max thickness of the subcutaneous translucency

Increased nuchal translucency and exomphalos in a trisomy 18 fetus at 12 weeks of gestation

Turners syndrome - cystic hygroma

Severe asymmetrical growth restriction in a 13-week fetus with triploidy.

NUCHAL TRANSLUCENCY

- NT is an ultrasonographic feature visible in 1st Tr of

pregnancy

- NT results from an accumulation of fluid at the base of

fetal neck

-NT thickness increases with GA (0.8 to 1.6 mm)

-Non specific marker,

thickness >2.5(3.0) mm associated with an increased risk of aneuploidy, cardiovascular & pulmonary defects, skeletal dysplasia, renal, metabolic defects & congenital infections & fetal demise.

• Population Medians / MoM

•Gestational Age

•Maternal Age

•Recurrence Risk

•Singleton vs Twins

•Maternal Weight

•Ethnicity

•Diabetes

•Smoking

•Analytical Imprecision

•Risk Calculation ~ NT ~ Biochemistry ~ Combined ~ Integrated

OUTCOME

Variables

100100,,000 pregnancies000 pregnancies

Maternal age Maternal age 606030%30%

Serum biochemistry at 16 wksSerum biochemistry at 16 wks 13013065%65%

Nuchal translucency (NT) at 12 wksNuchal translucency (NT) at 12 wks 75%75% 150150

Fetal NT & Fetal NT & ßß--hCGhCG & PAPP& PAPP -- A at 12 A at 12 wkswks

180180**90%90%

Screening for Screening for trisomytrisomy 2121

Effectiveness of different methods of screeningEffectiveness of different methods of screening

Method of screeningMethod of screening Number detectedNumber detectedDetection rateDetection rate

Screen positiveScreen positive* * 5%5%

N=5,000N=5,000

Trisomy Trisomy 2121

N=200N=200

NicolaidesNicolaides KH. Fetal nuchal translucency. Am J KH. Fetal nuchal translucency. Am J ObstetObstet GynecolGynecol 20042004

* 2.5% Screen positive

Integrated Test

SAMSAS©

Procedure related fetal loss rates are difficult figures to obtain. Corrections need to be made for the background spontaneous fetal loss.

1 : 251 : 131 : 41 : 1Fetal loss per case of Down syndrome detected

81550200Amniocenteses performed per case detected

IntegratedScreening

First trimester combined screening

Second trimester

biochemical screening

Maternal Age

Screening alone

SnijdersSnijderset al 1995et al 1995

65% Trisomy 2165% Trisomy 21

00

2020

4040

6060

8080

100100

1010 1515 2020 2525 3030 3535 4040



<1% <1% TriploidyTriploidy

95% 47xxx/xxy/xyy95% 47xxx/xxy/xyy

20% 45x20% 45x

%%

Gestational age Gestational age

Background RiskBackground Risk

Nicolaides et al., The 11-14-week scan, London 1999

Maternal age Maternal age

Background RiskBackground Risk

0.0001

0.001

0.01

0.1

1

10

20 25 30 35 40 44

Years

Risk %

↑↑ Trisomy 21Trisomy 21



xxx/xxx/xxy/xyyxxy/xyy

45x45x

TriploidyTriploidy

SnijdersSnijderset al 1995et al 1995Nicolaides et al., The 11-14-week scan, London 1999

Assessment of RiskAssessment of Risk

Previous Chromosomal Previous Chromosomal AbnormalityAbnormality

}}45XO45XO47XXY/XXX47XXY/XXXTriploidyTriploidy

Trisomy 21 Trisomy 21 Trisomy 18Trisomy 18Trisomy 13Trisomy 13 }} ++

0.75%0.75%

Age Age RiskRisk

Marker Levels Change Significantly with Gestation

Measured levels are converted toMultiples Of the Population Median or MoM values.

1 MoM = Reference for all markers

beta hCG at 10 wks GA

Patient 120 IU/L = 2 multiples Median 60 IU/L

MoM values are independent of gestational age and concentration Units

LogMoM values are used in calculations as they exhibit a Gaussian distribution ( Mean +/- SD)

492492492N =

Unaffected 2nd Trimester

UE3_MOMBHCG_MOMSAFP_MOM

3

2

1

0490490490490N =

Unaffected 1st Trimester

PAPP_A_MoMBHCG_MOMSAFP_MOMNT_MOM

3

2

1

0

+0.75% to both odds

Previous T21 + T18/T13

+0.75% to T18 Risk odds

Previous T18/T13

+0.75% to T21 Risk odds

Previous T21

/1.67/1.86/1.9/2.10/2.13Twins

/0.96/0.81/0.94/0.94/1.03Smoker

/0.93/0.79/0.96/0.96/0.9DiabetesIDDM

/0.99/1.553/1.09/1.107/1.17RaceAfro-Caribbean

Chineses, Korean, Japanese

/1.07/1.093/1.061/1.061RaceOriental

Indian,Pakistani, Thai, Malyasian

/1.07/1.082/0.91/0.925/0.94Race SouthAsian

/1.06/0.8/0.9/0.9/1.09RaceAboriginal

Race Caucasian

/0.92/0.89/1.09/1.08IVF

Risk OddsUe3_MoM

PappA_MoMBeta_MoM2nd

Beta_MoM1st

AFP_MoM 2nd

AFP_MoM 1st

Adjustments

Maternal WeightB et a M o M 's vs W eig ht Kg

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

1.1

1.2

1.3

40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120

Kgs

MoM

Pappa MoM's vs Weight Kg

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120

Kgs

MoM

Noveux 1996, Graaf/Cuckle 2000, SAMSAS/Murdoch 2002

490490490N =

Unaffected 1st Trimester

PAPP_A_MoMBHCG_MOMNT_MOM

3

2

1

0

SAMSAS©

196196196N =

Twins 1st Trimester


MoM

5

4

3

2

1

0

Increasing Incidence of

Twins

(1990–2003) 1:70 to 1:55

* Assisted reproduction

* Rate of twinning increases with age.

>20% (2006) of pregnancies are now to women 35yrs or over, up from <9% in 1990.

Twins Management

� Screening and Chorionicity� Nuchal discordance (mono and dichorionic)� Diagnostic tests (CVS and Amniocentesis)� Selective feticide� Twin to twin transfusion� Laser ablation of vessels� Delivery

Down syndrome First Trimester


6

5

4

3

2

1

0

Trisomy 18 First Trimester


8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

0

Turners syndrome First Trimester


8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

0

Triploidy First Trimester


9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

0

Digynic

Diandric

T18 2nd Trimester


5.0

4.0

3.0

2.0

1.0

0.0

Triploidy 2nd Trimester


5

4

3

2

1

0

T21 2nd Trimester


5

4

3

2

1

0

Turners 2nd Trimester


5

4

3

2

1

0

Diandric

Digynic

(GA Overestimate )

Anencephaly 2nd Trimester


10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

0

Gastroschisis 2nd Trimester


10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

0

RISKS

1. Open Neural Tube Defects (NTD) 2. Down syndrome / Aneuploidy3. Other

NTD Down syndrome / Aneuploidy

2nd Trimester 1st & 2nd Trimester↑ AFP ≥ 2 MoM ↑ Risk ≥ 1 in 300Independent of Maternal Age Age DependentMorphology scan CVS / Amnio

~ 1/30 will have a NTD ~ 1/20 or 1/40 will have DS

Other Not NTD & Not DS: AFP < 2 MoM & DS risk is < 1 in 300But

Biochemical results fall outside the Normal expected.

Not NTD & Not Downs Profiles

SAMSAS screened pregnancies N=62,563

1st Trimester N= 26,914 2nd Trimester N= 35,649

Profile

Non Downs

N= 206 (0.77%)

Profile

Not NTD Not Downs

N= 123 (0.35%)

Total N = 329 (0.53%)

OUTCOMES

NOT KNOWN

N = 25 (7.6%)

NORMAL

N = 103 (31.3%)

FETAL DEATH

N = 171 (52%)

ABNORMAL

N = 30 ( 9.1%)

9 x Triploidy, 9 x T18

3 x T15, 3 x Anenceph.1st Tr

2 x Turners, 2 x Mult. Abn.

2 x Metabolic

1st Trimester ? Fail

PAPP_A_MoMBHCG_MOMSAFP_MOM

3

2

1

0

•N= 149

•Not Known= 4

•Normal= 2 (Obese~no NT)

•Fetal Death= 137

•Abnormal= 6 (1xTriploidy,2xXO,2xT15,1xAnencephaly)

•Anomalies Found 143/145

•Odds 1/1 ( 98.6%)

Not viable at time of screen.

No NT measured

2nd Trimester ? Fail


3

2

1

0

Not viable at time of screen.

•N= 24

•Not Known= 2

•Normal= 0

•Fetal Death= 18

•Abnormal= 4(2xT18,1xAnencephaly,1xMultiple Con. Abn.)


•Odds 1/1 (100%)

•N= 57

•Not Known= 7

•Normal= 39

•Fetal Death= 3

•Abnormal= 8 (4xTriploidy,1xT18,1xOther,1xAnencephaly,1xRenal)


•Odds 1/4.5 ( 22%)

1st Trimester Not Downs


3.0

2.0

1.0

0.0

Viable at time of screen.

2nd Trimester Not NTD Not Downs


3

2

1

0

•N= 99

•Not Known= 12

•Normal= 62

•Fetal Death= 13

•Abnormal= 12(4xTrip.,6xT18,1xMultiple Con. Abn.,1xMetabolic)


•Odds 1/3.5 ( 28.6%)

Viable at time of screen.

Missed 1st Trimester Fetal Deaths


3.0

2.5

2.0

1.5

1.0

.5

0.0

Missed 2nd Trimester Fetal Deaths


3

2

1

0

1st Trimester Not Downs


3.0

2.0

1.0

0.0

2nd Trimester Not NTD Not Downs


3

2

1

0

Detected Detected

SAMSAS T21 & Non NTD Non Downs distributions

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

1.1

1.2

-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Discriminatory variable

T21

Non NTD Non Downs

Unaffected

The best way to detect these pregnancies is through discriminatory algorithms and distributions , utilizing multiplemarkers.

False -ves

Y= 0.425*ln_beta_MoM – 0.631*ln_Papp-a_MoM +0.761*ln_NT_MoM

What does a risk report mean? % Recall % Det. ODDS

Adverse Outcome

ODDS Affected

Miss Rate

2nd Tr Raised NTD

Risk

3% >90% 1 / 8 1 / 30 1 / 10,000

2nd Tr Raised DS

Risk

5% 65% 1 / 30 1 / 50 1 / 2,500

1st Tr Raised DS

Risk

5% 90% 1 / 10 1 / 15 1 / 3,500

Not NTD Not Downs ? Viability

0.5% 75% 1 / 4 1 / 500

Summary data ~ SAMSAS yearly audits SA Birth defects Register Reports

Reassurance of ≥≥≥≥ 99.8 % & Anomaly Risk of 2.0 – 25%

DS Risk = Mat. Age Risk x LR

DS Risk = Mat. Age Risk x LR

Discriminatory Variable

3210-1-2

1.0

.8

.6

.4

.2

0.0

Unaffected Affected

Detection Rate

False -veFalse +ve’s

h1

h2

LRaff = h2/h1Y= 0.425*ln_beta_MoM – 0.631*ln_Papp-a_MoM +0.761*ln_NT_MoM

SAMSAS©

DS Risk =Mat. Age Risk × LR

• 20 yrs = 1 in 1600 × 2 = 1 in 800

• 30 yrs = 1 in 1100 × 2 = 1 in 550

• 35 yrs = 1 in 500 × 2 = 1 in 250

• 40 yrs = 1 in 156 × 2 = 1 in 78

• 45 yrs = 1 in 40 × 2 = 1 in 20

Age Specific Performance Comparison of 1st and 2nd Trimester Screening.

Maternal Age vs Recall and Detection

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

15 20 25 30 35 40 45

Maternal Age at Delivery

%

%RR 2nd %DR 2nd %RR 1st %DR 1st

RR

DR

BENEFITS OF AN EARLY SCAN

• confirms the fetus is alive

• permits accurate dating of pregnancy

• allows early diagnosis of multiple pregnancy & chorionicity

• detects major structural abnormalities and missed abortion

SAMSAS©

SAMSAS©

Why did we introduce 1st trimester combined screening into SA ?

SAMSAS© Down Syndrome

Detect Recall %≥35 %PG≥30 Age2nd Tr91-95 63% 4.9% 9% 20% 28

96-00 76.7% 6.6% 15% 30% 29

01-03 76.7% 7.4% 17% 35% 30

1st Tr 90.9% 4.9% 25% 31.3

Primigravida

IntG 90.9% 2.5% 22% 31.2

Combining first and second trimester markers for Down syndrome screening: Think twice

Robert Cocciolone, Kate Brameld, Peter O'Leary, Eric Haan, Peter Muller, Karen Shand

Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2008; 48: 492-500

• benefits of an early scan

• less false +ves & -ves

• less normal fetuses lost

• higher detection

• personal benefits to patients from earlier diagnosis

Advantages of 1st trimester screening

Disadvantages

• cost of the nuchal translucency scan

• logistically more difficult to manage

Logistical considerations?

1TR & 2TR screening will coexist.

Management of reports & requests.

How many risks, by whom and when?

Audits and ongoing programme evaluation.

How can these be addressed?

Centralised service & databasefor, - all patient demographics- biochemical results- NT measurements & providers- reporting- recalculation of risks- retrievable data for analysis

Logical software - risks linked to gestation (1TR & 2TR algorithms)

Trends in state/based Down syndrome screening and invasive prenatal testing with the introduction of first trimester combined Down syndrome, South Australia 1995-2005

Muller PR, Cocciolone R, Haan EA, et al

Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196:315.e1-315.e7.

Utilization of maternal serum Down syndrome screening % of all confinements

0102030405060708090

100

1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Year

%

NS

69-79%

Utilization of second trimester maternal serum (∆) and first trimester combined Down syndrome

screening (□), % of all confinements

0102030405060708090

100

1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Year

%

75%

25%

49%

0.8%

*

*

* P < 0.001

% confinements ≥ 35 years (•) of age vs % of confinements undergoing invasive prenatal tests (∆)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Year

%

7.6%9.3%

* P < 0.001

*

Confinements ≥ 35 years of age undergoing invasive prenatal tests

% of confinements ≥ 35 years of age with invasive prenatal test

05

101520253035404550

1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Year

% * 24.8%

43%

* P < 0.001

Number of invasive prenatal tests to detect one DS fetus

1/40472005

1/49342004

1/46422003

1/66442002

1/90362001

1/79372000

1/71421999

1/61461998

1/83411997

1/94321996

1/86321995

Rate of DS per invasive

procedure*

Down syndrome cases

Year

* p < 0.001*

Number of invasive prenatal tests to detect one aneuploid fetus

1/15912005

1/21652004

1/24642003

1/32552002

1/30552001

1/32562000

1/33601999

1/31651998

1/38501997

1/47461996

1/35511995

Rate of aneuploidy per

invasive procedure*Aneuploidy casesYear

*

* p < 0.001

Overall Prenatal Detected Down Syndrome cases (%)

83.0472005

88.2342004

81.0422003

65.9442002

58.3362001

70.3372000

71.4421999

73.9461998

70.7411997

81.3321996

71.9321995

Prenatal detected DS cases(%)**

Down syndrome cases

Year

** p = 0.21

••Demonstrated an improved efficiency in the Demonstrated an improved efficiency in the utilization of invasive prenatal testsutilization of invasive prenatal tests

••Despite the increase in gravid women Despite the increase in gravid women ≥≥ 35 years of 35 years of age the number of invasive prenatal tests in this age age the number of invasive prenatal tests in this age group has significantly declinedgroup has significantly declined

••Despite the significant decrease in invasive prenatal Despite the significant decrease in invasive prenatal tests the overall antenatal detection of Down tests the overall antenatal detection of Down syndrome did syndrome did notnot decrease, and appears to increase decrease, and appears to increase once the utilization of first trimester combined Down once the utilization of first trimester combined Down syndrome screening reaches > 30% of confinementssyndrome screening reaches > 30% of confinements

To review changes in the utilization and effectiveness of state/population-based antenatal screening for NTDs in South

Australia from 1986 to 2004

Utilization of MSAFP and First Trimester Screening

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006Year

%

%confinements with first trimester combined DS scre ening% confinements with MSAFP

94.5 **2417,8671999-2004

88.832*19,4371992-98

864119,7141986-91

Overall antenatal detection of NTD(%)

Average NTDs/Yr

(#)

Average births/Yr

(#)

Year

** p<0.001** p<0.001

*State*State--wide educational drive on the benefits of Folic Acid wide educational drive on the benefits of Folic Acid supplementation for the reduction of supplementation for the reduction of NTDsNTDs 19941994

Despite a significant decrease in the utilization o f MSAFP screening, the population-based detection of NTDs has increased significantly in South Australia.

The decreased utilization of second trimester The decreased utilization of second trimester MSAFP represents improve clinician confidence in MSAFP represents improve clinician confidence in second trimester ultrasound for the detection of second trimester ultrasound for the detection of NTDsNTDs

SAMSAS©

….future directions

•new biochemical markers

•fetal cells in maternal circulation

•fetal DNA in maternal circulation

•complex protein profiles - mass spectrometry

•ADAM12 (A Disintegrin And Metalloprotease) is a multidomain Zn containing protein with protease, cell adhesion and signaling activity.

•Researchers focus on ADAMs has been asthma,alzheimers and cancer (breast, liver, colon)

•ADAM12 cleaves IGFBP-3 & 5 and may regulate the bioavailability of IGF (PAPP-A cleaves IGFBP-4)

•Overall, it appears that ADAMs are expressed during growth and development.

•Human placenta expresses very high levels of ADAM12

•Is it useful in MSS programs?

0.77 0.97 1.54 ADAM12 T21 Median MoM

Caucasian Adam12 RUO MoM vs maternal weight

y = 0.00009011x2 - 0.02431198x + 2.25980095

R2 = 0.20802869

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150

weight

Ada

m12

MoM

ADAM12RUO_MoM Poly. (ADAM12RUO_MoM)

Ethnicity Cases UncorrectedMedian

ng/ml / MoM

Median Weight

kg

Weight correctedMedian

MoM

? 4385 597 / 0.99 68 0.98

Aboriginal 94 597 / 0.89 73 0.95

Afro-Caribbean

71 994 / 1.15 65 1.12

Caucasian 5604 562 / 0.99 68 1.0

Oriental 153 788 / 1.28 55 1.10

South Asian 419 738 / 1.12 56.5 .98

Total/Median 10726 587 / 1.0 67 1.0

1.669227Twins

0.9470493IVF

0.8670758Smoker

0.767443IDDM

ADAM12 MoM

uncorrected

Weightkg

Cases

92.5(62/67)

89.6(60/67)

79.0(53/67)

1st Tr Combined

83 – 97(N=8579)

89.6(60/67)

86.6(58/67)

74.6(50/67)

1st Tr Combined

+ADAM12

76.1(35/46)

73.9(34/46)

93.6(102/109)

95.4(104/109)

100(42/42)

100(42/42)

7%

69.6(32/46)

65(30/46)

91.7(100/109)

91.7(100/109)

97.6 (41/42)

95.2(40/42)

5%

82.6(90/109)

85.3(93/109)

95.2 (40/42)

92.9(39/42)

3%

Triple Test+

ADAM12

Triple Test1st Tr Combined

+ADAM12

1st Tr Combined

1st Tr Combined

+ADAM12

1st Tr Combined

FPR

98 – 140(N=2941)

63 – 97 (N=12227)

≤ 82 (N= 3648)

Gest’nDays

Detection Rate%(no)

Detection Rate%(no)

Second Trimester

First Trimester

All ADAMs

95.5(21/22)

95.5(21/22)

81.8(18/22)

1st Tr Combined

83 – 97(N=8579)

95.5(21/22)

95.5(21/22)

77.3(17/22)

1st Tr Combined

+ADAM12

85.7(6/7)

85.7(6/7)

97.0(32/33)

97.0(32/33)

100(11/11)

100(11/11)

7%

71.4(5/7)

57.1(4/7)

97.0(32/33)

97.0(32/33)

100 (11/11)

90.9(10/11)

5%

81.8(27/33)

81.8(27/33)

90.9 (10/11)

81.8(9/11)

3%

Triple Test+

ADAM12

Triple Test1st Tr Combined

+ADAM12

1st Tr Combined

1st Tr Combined

+ADAM12

1st Tr Combined

FPR

98 – 140(N=2941)

63 – 97 (N=12227)

≤ 82 (N= 3648)

Gest’nDays

Detection Rate%(no)

Detection Rate%(no)

Second Trimester

First Trimester

ProsADAMs

All aff 42 67 109 46

•All current publications are based on measurements from frozen samples

•Might be useful: 9-10wks, Valinen 2009, Spencer 2007

•No advantage: 11-13wks Poon 2009

•Could be considered in multi-marker combinations: 2nd Tr Donaldson 2008 ↑DR 2-3% and ↓FPR 0.9-1.7%

•Other pregnancy complications: ↓ in IUGR/SGA Cowans & Spencer 2007,

↓ in PE Laigaard 2005

? IVF Laigaard 2009

SUMMARY

•ADAM12 levels affected by mat. wt, ethnicity, IDDM, smoking, Twins, IVF

•ADAM12 levels increase with gestation in normal pregnancies

•ADAM12 med MoM increases with gestation in affected T21 pregnancies

•In T21 pregnancies ADAM12 levels are low in early 1st Tr, equivocal in mid to late 1st Tr and elevated in 2nd trimester

•9-11w ~ 2.3-2.4% ↑DR with ADAM12 at a 3-5% FPR

•12-13w+6d performance drops with ADAM12

•9-13w+6d no advantage in using ADAM12

•14-20w MSS performance improves with ADAM12

•Improved performance can be translated to either ↑DR for a fixed FPR or to ↓FPR for a fixed risk cut off

•Larger prospective studies are needed to further assess its value in MSS programs

SOUTH AUSTRALIAN MATERNAL SERUM …...SOUTH AUSTRALIAN MATERNAL SERUM ANTENATAL SCREENING (SAMSAS ©) PROGRAM Robert Cocciolone, Head, Antenatal Screening, WCH Genetics & Molecular

Documents