IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division Sony Music Entertainment, et ai. Plaintiffs, V. Cox Communications, Inc., et ai. Defendants. Case No. 1; 18-cv-950-LO-IDD Hon. Liam O'Grady AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court are the Parties' Cross Motions for Summary Judgment. Dkt. 312 (Pis.' Mot.), Dkt. 328 (Defs.' Mot.). In a hearing before the Court on November 26,2019, Defendants directed the Court's attention to an issue regarding the knowledge element for contributory infringement, and its treatment at summary judgment. Specifically, there is confusion regarding the treatment of musical compositions within a prima facie case for contributory liability. The Court agrees with the Parties that clarification is appropriate, and takes this opportunity to clarify its ruling. As to knowledge of musical compositions in suit. Section 1I.B.2 is replaced, and this opinion supersedes the Memorandum Opinion and Order of November 15,2019 (Dkt. 586). Fifty-three members of the recording industry ("Plaintiffs" or "Sony") bring this action for copyright infiingement. They seek relief from Cox Communications, Inc. and CoxCom, LLC ("Defendants" or "Cox") for infringement of Plaintiffs' works that allegedly occurred by unauthorized download and distribution of files using Cox's network. Plaintiffs allege both contributory infringement and vicarious liability for infnngement by Cox's internet subscribers. Specifically, Plaintiffs claim that Defendants are liable for infringement of 7,068 copyrighted Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 1 of 26 PageID# 25497
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Alexandria Division
Sony Music Entertainment, et ai.
Plaintiffs,
V.
Cox Communications, Inc., et ai.
Defendants.
Case No. 1; 18-cv-950-LO-IDD
Hon. Liam O'Grady
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Before the Court are the Parties' Cross Motions for Summary Judgment. Dkt. 312 (Pis.'
Mot.), Dkt. 328 (Defs.' Mot.). In a hearing before the Court on November 26,2019, Defendants
directed the Court's attention to an issue regarding the knowledge element for contributory
infringement, and its treatment at summary judgment. Specifically, there is confusion regarding
the treatment of musical compositions within a prima facie case for contributory liability. The
Court agrees with the Parties that clarification is appropriate, and takes this opportunity to clarify
its ruling. As to knowledge of musical compositions in suit. Section 1I.B.2 is replaced, and this
opinion supersedes the Memorandum Opinion and Order of November 15,2019 (Dkt. 586).
Fifty-three members of the recording industry ("Plaintiffs" or "Sony") bring this action
for copyright infiingement. They seek relief from Cox Communications, Inc. and CoxCom,
LLC ("Defendants" or "Cox") for infringement of Plaintiffs' works that allegedly occurred by
unauthorized download and distribution of files using Cox's network. Plaintiffs allege both
contributory infringement and vicarious liability for infnngement by Cox's internet subscribers.
Specifically, Plaintiffs claim that Defendants are liable for infringement of 7,068 copyrighted
Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 1 of 26 PageID# 25497
Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 2 of 26 PageID# 25498
Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 3 of 26 PageID# 25499
Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 4 of 26 PageID# 25500
Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 5 of 26 PageID# 25501
Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 6 of 26 PageID# 25502
Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 7 of 26 PageID# 25503
Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 8 of 26 PageID# 25504
Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 9 of 26 PageID# 25505
Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 10 of 26 PageID# 25506
Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 11 of 26 PageID# 25507
Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 12 of 26 PageID# 25508
Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 13 of 26 PageID# 25509
Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 14 of 26 PageID# 25510
Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 15 of 26 PageID# 25511
Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 16 of 26 PageID# 25512
Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 17 of 26 PageID# 25513
Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 18 of 26 PageID# 25514
Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 19 of 26 PageID# 25515
Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 20 of 26 PageID# 25516
Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 21 of 26 PageID# 25517
Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 22 of 26 PageID# 25518
Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 23 of 26 PageID# 25519
Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 24 of 26 PageID# 25520
Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 25 of 26 PageID# 25521
Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 26 of 26 PageID# 25522