Top Banner
Soc. 2155 Week 3 Causation and Experiments I. Causation Relationships between variables Types of association Criteria for causality II. Experiments – testing cause and effect Explanatory research True experimental designs Quasi-experimental designs Internal validity External validity Ethical issues Strengths and weaknesses
23

Soc. 2155 Week 3 Causation and Experiments I. Causation –Relationships between variables –Types of association –Criteria for causality II. Experiments.

Dec 20, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Soc. 2155 Week 3 Causation and Experiments I. Causation –Relationships between variables –Types of association –Criteria for causality II. Experiments.

Soc. 2155 Week 3 Causation and Experiments

I. Causation– Relationships between variables– Types of association– Criteria for causality

II. Experiments – testing cause and effect– Explanatory research– True experimental designs– Quasi-experimental designs– Internal validity– External validity– Ethical issues– Strengths and weaknesses

Page 2: Soc. 2155 Week 3 Causation and Experiments I. Causation –Relationships between variables –Types of association –Criteria for causality II. Experiments.

Association = relationship• Does not have to be causal.

• Positive association = as X increases, Y increases.

• Negative association = as X increases, Y decreases.

• Qualitative variables: presence of X predicts presence or absence of Y.

Page 3: Soc. 2155 Week 3 Causation and Experiments I. Causation –Relationships between variables –Types of association –Criteria for causality II. Experiments.

Which associations could be causal?

• Years work experience/ income

• # churches / # bars in a town

• Cigarette smoking/ lung cancer

• # firefighters called to fire/ $ amount of damage

• Race/ poverty

Spurious association = apparent association caused by a third factor

Page 4: Soc. 2155 Week 3 Causation and Experiments I. Causation –Relationships between variables –Types of association –Criteria for causality II. Experiments.

Cause = necessary and sufficient condition

Necessary: X must be present in order for Y to follow.

(ex: to get an “A” it is necessary to complete all assignments).

Sufficient: If X occurs, Y must follow.(ex: if you get 100% on every assignment, you will get an

“A” in the class.)

Page 5: Soc. 2155 Week 3 Causation and Experiments I. Causation –Relationships between variables –Types of association –Criteria for causality II. Experiments.

3 criteria for causalityX causes Y if:

• X precedes Y in time

• X and Y are statistically associated

• All other potential causes of Y have been ruled out.

Page 6: Soc. 2155 Week 3 Causation and Experiments I. Causation –Relationships between variables –Types of association –Criteria for causality II. Experiments.

Additional Criteria

• Mechanism – connection between “cause” and “effect” – how the cause operates to produce the effect.

• Context – situations, groups, places, conditions, etc. In which the cause produces the effect.

Page 7: Soc. 2155 Week 3 Causation and Experiments I. Causation –Relationships between variables –Types of association –Criteria for causality II. Experiments.

Determinants/ partial causesMost sociological phenomena have multiple

causes. “Determinant” = partial cause or predictor. Not a complete cause.

Example: Some determinants of income:

Education

Skill

Training

Experience

Intelligence

Marital status

Talent

Personality

Job duties

Type of company

Occupation

Gender

Race

Geographic area

Industry

Page 8: Soc. 2155 Week 3 Causation and Experiments I. Causation –Relationships between variables –Types of association –Criteria for causality II. Experiments.

Types of Causes

Nomothetic Cause – General explanation of a class of phenomena. (e.g., causes of terrorism, crime)

Idiographic Cause – Specific event or sequence of events. (e.g., causes of 9/11 attacks, sudden rise in crime rates) May be historical in focus.

Page 9: Soc. 2155 Week 3 Causation and Experiments I. Causation –Relationships between variables –Types of association –Criteria for causality II. Experiments.

Multivariate Relationships

ZX

Y

Y

Y

Y

Z

Z

Z

XX

X

Multiple causes (determinants) of Y

Z as spurious cause of X and Y

Direct and indirect effects

Z intervenes B/T X and Y OR Z “explains” relationship B/T X and Y

Page 10: Soc. 2155 Week 3 Causation and Experiments I. Causation –Relationships between variables –Types of association –Criteria for causality II. Experiments.

Experiments

• Explanatory research• True experiments• Experimental designs• Quasi-experimental designs• Internal validity• External validity• Ethical issues• Strengths and weaknesses

Page 11: Soc. 2155 Week 3 Causation and Experiments I. Causation –Relationships between variables –Types of association –Criteria for causality II. Experiments.

Explanatory Research

• Purpose: to explain, to determine cause/effect

• What is explained? Variation in the dependent variable

• What can be studied in an experiment?Limited, narrow causal relationships

Variables that can be studied in lab

Topics for which theory has been developed

Page 12: Soc. 2155 Week 3 Causation and Experiments I. Causation –Relationships between variables –Types of association –Criteria for causality II. Experiments.

True experiment includes

• Two groups (experimental and control)

• Random assignment to groups

• Variation in independent variable (manipulated by researcher)

• Measurement of dependent variable

Page 13: Soc. 2155 Week 3 Causation and Experiments I. Causation –Relationships between variables –Types of association –Criteria for causality II. Experiments.

The groups

• Experimental group – is exposed to independent variable (I.V.)

• Control group - is not exposed to I.V.

• I.V. is the only difference between the groups

• Any differences in dependent variable (D.V.) must be due to I.V.

Page 14: Soc. 2155 Week 3 Causation and Experiments I. Causation –Relationships between variables –Types of association –Criteria for causality II. Experiments.

Assignment to groups

• Randomization

– Easy to carry out

– Can control for unmeasured or uncontrolled factors

• Matching

– Specific characteristics matched in both groups

– May be very precise

– Requires knowledge of relevant characteristics

– May not control for omitted factors

Page 15: Soc. 2155 Week 3 Causation and Experiments I. Causation –Relationships between variables –Types of association –Criteria for causality II. Experiments.

Pretesting

• Measures D.V. before experiment

• Establishes comparability of experimental and control groups

• Provides baseline for comparison with posttest

• May teach or “clue in” subjects (pretest effect)

• Costs extra

Page 16: Soc. 2155 Week 3 Causation and Experiments I. Causation –Relationships between variables –Types of association –Criteria for causality II. Experiments.

Experimental Designs

Effect of I.V. = (O3-O1) – (O4-O2)

Groups Pretest I.V. Uncontrolled factors

Posttest Change

Exper. O1 X X O3 O3-O1

Control O2 X O4 O4-O2

Classic Pretest-Posttest-Control-Group

Page 17: Soc. 2155 Week 3 Causation and Experiments I. Causation –Relationships between variables –Types of association –Criteria for causality II. Experiments.

Experimental Designs

Effect of I.V. = (O1-O2)

Eliminates effect of pretest

Groups Pretest I.V. Uncontrolled factors

Posttest Change

Exper. N/A X X O1 N/A

Control N/A X O2 N/A

Posttest-Only

Page 18: Soc. 2155 Week 3 Causation and Experiments I. Causation –Relationships between variables –Types of association –Criteria for causality II. Experiments.

Experimental Designs

Effect of I.V. = (O3-O1) – (O4-O2) or (O5-O6)

Effect of pretest = (O3-O5) or (O4-O6)

Groups Pretest I.V. Uncontrolled factors

Posttest Change

Exper. 1 O1 X X O3 O3-O1

Control 1 O2 X O4 O4-O2

Exper. 2 X X O5

Control 2 X O6

Solomon four-group

Page 19: Soc. 2155 Week 3 Causation and Experiments I. Causation –Relationships between variables –Types of association –Criteria for causality II. Experiments.

Quasi-Experimental Designs

• May be used when true experiment isn’t possible

• Usually involve fewer controls– No control group– Approximately equivalent control group– May take place in the field– May be “ex post facto:” designed after the

“treatment”

Page 20: Soc. 2155 Week 3 Causation and Experiments I. Causation –Relationships between variables –Types of association –Criteria for causality II. Experiments.

Internal ValiditySource of Invalidity Solution

History – outside events Control group

Maturation – changes in subjects Control group

Testing – subject may learn Control group

Instrumentation - measurement Control group

Statistical regression - moderation Control group

Selection bias- groups not comparable Randomization

Mortality – dropping out Randomization

Contamination (competition, demoralization) Randomization

Treatment misidentification (experimenter expectations, placebo effect, Hawthorne effect)

Randomization, double blind, process analysis

Page 21: Soc. 2155 Week 3 Causation and Experiments I. Causation –Relationships between variables –Types of association –Criteria for causality II. Experiments.

External Validity

• Generalization to “real world”

• Often a problem in experiments

• 2 main issues– Would sample subjects behave same way

outside lab?– Cross-population generalizability: would

findings hold for different groups, times, places?

Page 22: Soc. 2155 Week 3 Causation and Experiments I. Causation –Relationships between variables –Types of association –Criteria for causality II. Experiments.

Ethical Issues

• Deception (misleading subjects about purpose of experiment)

• Selective distribution of benefits (also risks, harm)

Page 23: Soc. 2155 Week 3 Causation and Experiments I. Causation –Relationships between variables –Types of association –Criteria for causality II. Experiments.

Experiments’ Strengths and Weaknesses

Strengths

Isolation of cause/effect

High internal validity

Easy to replicate

Best used for explanatory studies (testing of hypotheses)

Weaknesses

External validity may be low or undetermined

Ethical issues

High cost per subject