Top Banner
Semantics for e-Science Collaboration Jan. 2005 Update
35
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Semantics for e-Science Collaboration Jan. 2005 Update.

Semantics for e-Science Collaboration

Jan. 2005 Update

Page 2: Semantics for e-Science Collaboration Jan. 2005 Update.

CoAKTinG 2005 Update: Overview

CoAKTinG in a nutshell

2005 NASA collaboration

Follow-on projects now deepening the collaboration

Page 3: Semantics for e-Science Collaboration Jan. 2005 Update.

interpretation of data/events

following through decisions/coordinating activities

producing documents& other artifacts

archiving/recovering information

informal and formalcommunication

meetings

Key collective activities in e-science

Page 4: Semantics for e-Science Collaboration Jan. 2005 Update.

e-Science collaboration technologies should support fluid movement around the space of…

consensus

knowledgeco

nteste

d

knowledge

unformalized

knowledgefo

rmaliz

ed

knowledge

e-Science

Page 5: Semantics for e-Science Collaboration Jan. 2005 Update.

Fluid movement in the e-Science collaboration design space…

Baseline tools: Whatever collaboration tools

scientists currently use…+

Options to codify semantics of: Presence Issues Options Constraints Arguments Procedures Workflow Events

Using: Instant Messaging status Semiformal hypermedia Formal ontologies Meeting event streams

Page 6: Semantics for e-Science Collaboration Jan. 2005 Update.

Extending the AKT Reference Ontology for e-Science collaboration

Extensions to support:• generation of multimedia presentations (e.g.

millisecond representations of time)

• meetings distributed across several (physical and virtual) locations

• exhibition of information objects as events (e.g. slides; videos; documents)

• meeting-specific (compound) information bearing objects (versions of resources used in meetings)

• annotation events (e.g. verbal comments, creation of Compendium nodes)

Page 7: Semantics for e-Science Collaboration Jan. 2005 Update.

mapping real time discussions/ group

sensemaking

following through decisions/coordinating activities

synthesising artifacts

recovering information from meetings

awareness ofcolleagues’

availability/ sense of ‘presence’virtual meetings

CoAKTinG toolset

Video conf.

BuddySpace

Compendium

I-X Process panels

Meeting Replay

Page 8: Semantics for e-Science Collaboration Jan. 2005 Update.

Technical integration: Jabber interoperability

I-X Process panels

Meeting Replay

BuddySpaceCompendium

Jabber XML

Messaging Server

Page 9: Semantics for e-Science Collaboration Jan. 2005 Update.

CoAKTinG e-Science Testbeds

1. Comb-e-Chem (UK e-Science Project)

2. Remote Science Teams supporting simulated Mars exploration

(NASA field trial)

Page 10: Semantics for e-Science Collaboration Jan. 2005 Update.

KnowledgeExtraction +

Formulisation

Knowledge and Process Modelling

+ Analysis

KnowledgeReuse

+Dissemination

InstrumentIdentification + Resource

Cooperation

RationaleCapture

+ decisionmaking

Data Analysis+

Considerations

Codifying scientific procedures with rationaleCodifying scientific procedures with rationale

Page 11: Semantics for e-Science Collaboration Jan. 2005 Update.

WorkflowExecution

And MonitoringInstrumentTracking

And utilisation

Resource+ Floor

Management

Run-time tracking and control

ActionRealisation+ RationaleFeedback

Comb-e-Chem: Facility e-Science in ActionComb-e-Chem: Facility e-Science in Action

PresenceAwareness + Remote

Participation

Page 12: Semantics for e-Science Collaboration Jan. 2005 Update.

CoAKTinG e-Science Testbeds

1. Comb-e-Chem (UK e-Science Project)

2. Remote Science Teams supporting simulated Mars exploration

(NASA field trial)

Page 13: Semantics for e-Science Collaboration Jan. 2005 Update.

Image Credits--- Mars: NASA/JPL/MSSS; Earth: NASA/JSC; Composite: MSSS

TowardsInterplanetary e-Science collaboration…

Page 14: Semantics for e-Science Collaboration Jan. 2005 Update.

Mars surface exploration field trial

Page 15: Semantics for e-Science Collaboration Jan. 2005 Update.

Collaboration Configuration

Scientist (Mars)

Scientist (Earth)

Scientist (Earth)

Scientist (Mars)

Scientist (Earth)

Software Agent

Architecture (Mars)

Compendium used as a collaboration medium at all intersections: humans+agents reading+writing maps

BuddySpace connecting Earth scientists (no real-time Mars connection)

Page 16: Semantics for e-Science Collaboration Jan. 2005 Update.

CoAKTinG NASA testbed:BuddySpace location-based presence for Earth geology team, plus 1-1/1-many instant messaging

Page 17: Semantics for e-Science Collaboration Jan. 2005 Update.

CoAKTinG NASA testbed:Compendium activity plans for surface exploration, constructed by Mars+Earth geologists, interpreted by software agents

The Compendium nodes and relationships in this plan were interpreted by Brahms software agents for monitoring and coordinating astronaut and robot activity during

surface explorations.

Copyright, 2004, RIACS/NASA Ames, Open University, Southampton UniversityNot to be used without permission

Page 18: Semantics for e-Science Collaboration Jan. 2005 Update.

CoAKTinG NASA testbed:Compendium science data map, generated by software agents, for interpretation by Mars+Earth geologists

The Compendium maps were autonomously created and populated with science data by Brahms software agents that use models of the mission plan, work process, data

flow and science data relationships to create the maps.

Copyright, 2004, RIACS/NASA Ames, Open University, Southampton UniversityNot to be used without permission

Page 19: Semantics for e-Science Collaboration Jan. 2005 Update.

CoAKTinG NASA testbed:Compendium scientific feedback map from Earth geologists to Mars colleagues about their map

Copyright, 2004, RIACS/NASA Ames, Open University, Southampton UniversityNot to be used without permission

Page 20: Semantics for e-Science Collaboration Jan. 2005 Update.

CoAKTinG NASA testbed:Meeting Replay tool for Earth scientists, synchronising video of Mars crew’s discussion with their Compendium maps

Copyright, 2004, RIACS/NASA Ames, Open University, Southampton UniversityNot to be used without permission

RIACS/NASA Ames Research CenterMobile Agents ProjectMaarten Sierhuis

KMi Open UniversityCoAKTinG ProjectSimon Buckingham-Shum & Al Selvin

Southampton UniversityCoAKTinG ProjectKevin PageDanius MichaelidesDave De RoureNigel Shadbolt

Page 21: Semantics for e-Science Collaboration Jan. 2005 Update.

NASA Mobile Agents field trial paper

http://eprints.aktors.org/375

Page 22: Semantics for e-Science Collaboration Jan. 2005 Update.

Plans for

NASA Mobile Agents field trial April 2005

Semantic Blogging (OU)rich human narrative mixed with formal semantics

+ Science Media Player (So’ton)

semantic multimedia filtering

Page 23: Semantics for e-Science Collaboration Jan. 2005 Update.

Hab

Semantic Blogspace for e-Science

EVA astronaut

Shannon’s blog/

aggregator

Stacy’sblog/

aggregator

RSS feedsRSS feed(s)OU

Compendiumserver

Page 24: Semantics for e-Science Collaboration Jan. 2005 Update.

SciOrgCompendium

server@OU

Hab

science data

Distributed sensemaking by semantic blogging

Shannon’s blog/

aggregator

Stacy’sblog /

aggregator

EVA astronaut

Blog commentary

Blog commentary

Page 25: Semantics for e-Science Collaboration Jan. 2005 Update.

SciOrgCompendium

server@OU

Hab

science data

‘Science Media Player’ to render+replay data

EVA astronaut

Shannon’s blog /

aggregator

Stacy’sblog /

aggregator

RSS feed

ScienceMediaPlayer

@So’ton

Page 26: Semantics for e-Science Collaboration Jan. 2005 Update.

Blog entries could therefore populate Compendium (or be written via a Compendium map)

Page 27: Semantics for e-Science Collaboration Jan. 2005 Update.

CoAKTinG Follow-on Projects

1. Memetic: Meeting Memory Technologies Informing Collaboration

(Manchester – Open – Southampton – Edinburgh)

2. Co-OPR: Collaborative Operations for Personnel Recovery

(Edinburgh – Open)

Page 28: Semantics for e-Science Collaboration Jan. 2005 Update.

m e m e t i c =

Access Grid collaboration environmentwww.AccessGrid.org

Compendiumwww.CompendiumInstitute.org

Meeting Replaywww.aktors.org/coakting

www.memetic-vre.net

+ +

Meeting Memory Technologies Informing Collaboration

Page 29: Semantics for e-Science Collaboration Jan. 2005 Update.

CoAKTinG Follow-on Projects

1. Memetic: Meeting Memory Technologies Informing Collaboration

(Manchester – Open – Southampton – Edinburgh)

2. Co-OPR: Collaborative Operations for Personnel Recovery

(Edinburgh – Open)

Page 30: Semantics for e-Science Collaboration Jan. 2005 Update.

Co-OPR =

Compendiumwww.CompendiumInstitute.org

I-Xwww.i-x.info

www.aiai.ed.ac.uk/project/co-opr

+

Co-OPR: Collaborative Operations for Personnel Recovery

Page 31: Semantics for e-Science Collaboration Jan. 2005 Update.

Compendium in Crisis Action Planning

Page 32: Semantics for e-Science Collaboration Jan. 2005 Update.

I-X domain modelling, planning & issue mgmnt.Process Panel

Domain Editor

Messenger

Map Tool

I-Plan

Page 33: Semantics for e-Science Collaboration Jan. 2005 Update.

“Grey Matter + Silicon”I-X Inputs to Compendium in simulated mission

• Issues and Responses• Activity Options• Constraints/Maps• Annotations/Notes

In a day long coalition personnel recovery operation in a political scenario, external evaluators reported that participants found Co-OPR was:

“…amongst the best of the tools demonstrated”

Page 34: Semantics for e-Science Collaboration Jan. 2005 Update.

In summary…

e-Science has proven an excellent testbed to explore the design space for semantic collaboration tools

CoAKTinG has demonstrated an approach to integrating tools to support fluid movement around the design space

Page 35: Semantics for e-Science Collaboration Jan. 2005 Update.

www.aktors.org/coakting