Top Banner
Fall RCTM 2012 Selection process - frame
13

Selection process frame

Jul 04, 2015

Download

Education

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Selection process   frame

Fall RCTM 2012Selection process - frame

Page 2: Selection process   frame

AF

Interviews

RR AF Int.

# of ppl selected re/plan

% of applicants recruited

# of ppl at

LTC

% of newies at

LTC

BRNO 109 71 65% 31/26 28% 26 84%

BČ 16 14 88% 10/12 63% 7 70%

ZUČ 73 57 78% 35/37 48% 26 74%

HK 31 22 71% 17/15 55% 7 41%

KARVINÁ 38 37 97% 32/30 84% 20 63%

OLOMOUC 45 34 76% 20/24 44% 12 60%

OSTRAVA 70 51 73% 30/31 43% 19 63%

PILSEN 35 31 89% 18/28 51% 13 72%

PRAHA 145 110 76% 52/54 36% 49 94%

ZLÍN 45 37 82% 29/28 64% 25 86%

Current # of

newies25.11.

31

9

29

13

19

18

21

15

47

28

RR of newies25.11.

100%

90%

83%

76%

59%

90%

70%

83%

90%

97%

Page 3: Selection process   frame

AF Interviews

RR AF Int.

# of ppl selected re/plan

% of applicants recruited

# of ppl at

LTC

% of newies at

LTC

Current # of

newies25.11.

RR of newies25.11.

Brno 109 71 65% 31/26 28% 26 84% 31 100%

Zlín 45 37 82% 29 64% 25 86% 28 97%

Page 4: Selection process   frame

AF Interviews

RR AF Int.

# of ppl selected re/plan

% of applicants recruited

# of ppl at

LTC

% of newies at

LTC

Current # of

newies25.11.

RR of newies25.11.

OL 45 34 76% 20/24 44% 12 60% 18 90%

Page 5: Selection process   frame

AF Interviews

RR AF Int.

# of ppl selected re/plan

% of applicants recruited

# of ppl at

LTC

% of newies at

LTC

Current # of

newies25.11.

RR of newies25.11.

ZUČ 73 57 78% 35 48% 26 74% 29 83%

Page 6: Selection process   frame

AF Interviews

RR AF Int.

# of ppl selected re/plan

% of applicants recruited

# of ppl at

LTC

% of newies at

LTC

Current # of

newies25.11.

RR of newies25.11.

BČ 16 14 88% 10/12 63% 7 70% 9 90%

Ostrava 70 51 73% 30 43% 19 63% 21 70%

Page 7: Selection process   frame

AFIntervie

ws RR AF Int.

# of ppl selected re/plan

% of applicants recruited

# of ppl at

LTC

% of newies at

LTC

Current # of

newies25.11.

RR of newies25.11.

Pilsen 35 31 89% 18/28 51% 13 72% 15 83%

Praha 145 110 76% 52 36% 49 94% 47 90%

Karviná 38 37 97% 32 84% 20 63% 19 59%

Page 8: Selection process   frame

AF Interviews

RR AF Int.

# of ppl selected re/plan

% of applicants recruited

# of ppl at

LTC

% of newies at

LTC

Current # of

newies25.11.

RR of newies25.11.

HK 31 22 71% 17 55% 7 41% 13 76%

Page 9: Selection process   frame

Comments • Unfortunately we didn‘t track the retention rate btw

interviews and AC / trial period (or vice versa), therefore we don‘t know how many people participated in the next part of the selection process

• Prague and Brno have quite small RR btw AF and interviews becasue of pre-selection based on AFs (also Prague had interviews after AC)

Page 10: Selection process   frame

Recommendation • 2 LCs with highest RR (0-3) (Brno 100%, Zlín 97%) used the

following frame of the selection process:

Page 11: Selection process   frame

• 3 LCs with RR 90% (Olomouc, Praha, B)ČUsed the following frames:

Olomouc:

* Some newies selected after LTC

Page 12: Selection process   frame

Praha:

* The same frame used Pilsen (RR 83%) and Karviná (RR 59%) – I believe that the reason why Karvina has so low RR is the fact they recruited almost everybody who applied (84% of applicants)

Page 13: Selection process   frame

eské Bud joviceČ ě

* Bud jky are special case, I wouln‘t recommend this frame to other LCs since ěit decreases quality of the selection process and lowers the RR later on (Ostrava used this as well and their RR is 70%)