SAFIRE: Situational Awareness for Firefighters SITUATIONAL AWARENESS FOR FIRE FIGHTERS (SAFIRE) Goal: Improve the safety of firefighters by providing decision makers with greatly improved situational awareness during response activities SAFIRE Project DHS Update – September 15, 2009
24
Embed
SAFIRE: Situational Awareness for Firefighters SITUATIONAL AWARENESS FOR FIRE FIGHTERS (SAFIRE) Goal: Improve the safety of firefighters by providing decision.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
SAFIRE: Situational Awareness for Firefighters
SITUATIONAL AWARENESS FOR FIRE FIGHTERS (SAFIRE)
Goal: Improve the safety of firefighters by providing decision makers with
greatly improved situational awareness during response activities
“Incident Management, Resource Management, and Supply Chain Management” Nov. 5 and 6th at CERT, UCI, Irvine.
SAFIRE: Situational Awareness for Firefighters
SAFIRE Concept Overview
SAFIRE: Situational Awareness for Firefighters
SAFIRE System
FICB Visualization
External DataSources
Acousticdata
SAFIRE Core Technology Areas GIS
hazmat
occupancy
Multimodal Sensing Robust Network Infrastructure Visualization and User Interfaces (FICB) Sensor stream processing Integration of external data sources (Ebox) Speech
Video data
Environmentalsensors
Sensor database
FF physio.& location.
SAFIRE: Situational Awareness for Firefighters
Progress: Core Technology Areas
Speech Speech for situational awareness
Networking & Sensing Incorporation of new sensors (Co, SpCO, motes) New antenna array for increased coverage, multi-network & store-
and-forward architecture Stream management
ability to incorporate variety of sensors , multimodal sensor archival and retrieval functionality
FICB New functionalities in FICB – simplified UI, annotations, ebox
integration, etc. Ebox
Prototype development, ontologies for resource selection, integration of static and dynamic data such as sensing infrastructure of buildings
5
May 29, 2009
July 15, 2009
Today
demo/video July 15, 2009
July 15, 2009
7
SAFIRE Streams: A Semantic Middleware for Multi Sensor Applications
8
SATDeployer
SATQL
Sensor and computing infrastructure Heterogeneous sensors and processing nodes
Distributed Mobile-agent based runtime
Deployment of operators
Convert Query -> VS -> opGraph
FICB / SAFIRE Server
SATRuntime
SAFIRE Streams Architecture
SATSchedulerSATMonitor
Scheduleto meet QoS
Query results
Semantic context
Query
(entity, attribute,
value)
VSVS<opGraph>context1
<opGraph>Query i
InfrastructureDB
SA
TR
ep
osi
tory
OperatorDB
PolicyDB
SemanticDB
(entities, Relationships,
VS)
Semanticknowledge
...
9
SAFIRE Stream Middleware
Writing sensor applications is hard: -Continuous data-Sensor heterogeneity -Diversity of platforms-Tolerance to failures
• Powerful programming abstractions to ease application development
•Hide heterogeneity, failures, concurrency
•Core Services•alerting, triggering, data & stream management, queries.
•Mediation•application needs with resource constraints of devices & networks
Sensor
FICB FiltersAlerts Analysis
Networks
SA Applications
Middleware – glue between H/w, networks, OS and applications
Networks
Stream Middleware Goals
10
Key Concepts Driving SAFIRE Streams
Semantic Level: Entities -- people, appliances, and
Virtual Sensors: maps data captured by sensors into
events in the semantic world.
Event Logs: evolution of physical world as
observed by the sentient system
10
SAFIRE Streams models sensor embedded spaces at two levels
sentient Applications
Virtual Sensor
High level stream language like CQL
11
Key Concept: Virtual Sensors
Provide the “bridge” between sensors & the semantic “real” world concepts.
L, Room12, t>Filter
[L=Room1]
AP Readings Listener
AP Readings
to location
Translate Location to
Lon./Lat.
FingerprintDB
Location Virtual Sensor
WiFi fingerprints, t>
12
Virtual Sensors: Multi-Sensor Fusion to improve quality
<Peter, L, PDF, t>
AP Readings Listener
AP Readings to location
FingerprintDB
<Pet
er, L
, PD
F, t>
Signal strength Listener
Signal strength
triagulation
APlocations
Merge
<Person, L, Room12, t>
Location Virtual SensorUsing fingerprints
Location Virtual SensorUsing signal Strength
triangulation
14
Building Applications using Semantic Model
Virtual Sensors “hide” complexity of sensor programming from application developers Convert heterogeneous sensor streams into semantic event streams Hide sensor failures / imprecision through
Noise reduction (e.g., averaging over multiple samples) multi-sensor fusion (e.g., multiple location sensing technologies provide more accurate
location assessment) Semantics (e.g., speech sensors exploit word correlation to improve on ASR)
Applications can view the system as consisting of high level concepts such as entities, events, artifacts, spaces, etc.
SAFIRE Streams supports high level query languages for implementing queries & triggers: SQL style stream language (at design stage – not yet implemented) Event graph based language
15
Demo
5/27/09
16
Multi-sensor localization in SAFIRE Streams
17
Event Graphs in SAFIRE Streams
Triggers/continuous queries are converted into an event graph network. SATWARE Deployer submits the resulting event graph into an executable
pipeline based on available resources, machines and networks. Mediates with resources to guarantee application needs are met Multiple optimizations possible in executing such networks.
Locoperator
[FF1]
<FF1, L, Room12, t>
<FF1, L, Room12, t>
Join[t]
Filter[L=first floor]
Locoperator
[FF2]
<FF2, L, Room15, t>
{<FF1, L, Room12,t><FF2, L, Room15, t>}
Near[5 Rooms]
Detect when Fire Fighter 1 is on the 1st floor
Detect when FF1 & FF2 are near each other
18
Multi-sensor store / query / visualize in SAFIRE Streams
19
SAFIRE Streams Summary Middleware to ease multi-sensor applications
provides a powerful semantic interface for complex multi-sensor applications this feature used extensively in building SAFIRE SA
FireTrack SystemGoals of FireTrack1. A prototype framework for collecting, communicating, storing, and analyzing
exposure data entitled FireTrack
2. A detailed evaluation of the FireTrack system in a pilot study including specific recommendations on how to expand the system to a large scale deployment.
3. Data collected during the pilot study including exposure information at both the level of individual firefighters as well as at the environment under different conditions.
4. Database design to represent data captured about respiratory environments during fires including taxonomies to appropriately classify and analyze such data.
5. Specific recommendations on interventions techniques that can be realized through exposure monitoring that minimize avoidable exposure to toxins during firefighting.
6. Identification of long term partners who will be willing to (a) maintain such a system for capturing and managing exposure information, and (b) work with research groups to launch further (more comprehensive) data collection and analysis studies the FireTrack system will enable in the future.