Top Banner
Robot-Park Fully Automated Parking Solution
43

Robot park developer final revisions usa version

Jun 18, 2015

Download

Documents

Presentation for global launch of innovative Japanese robotics firm (Lombard Global client).
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Robot park developer final revisions usa version

Robot-Park™

Fully Automated Parking Solution

Page 2: Robot park developer final revisions usa version

Robots are transforming our

world, enhancing life by

providing added convenience,

more accuracy, higher quality,

and improved efficiency across

a growing number of industries.

The Transformation of Time and Space

Page 3: Robot park developer final revisions usa version

Introducing

EITO & GLOBAL JAPAN

Automated Robot Parking Systems

Developed the Robot-Park™ system

EITO SYSTEMS, COMPANY, LTD.

Machine/Robot Manufacturing

Founded 1986

Research & Development, Design & Manufacture,

Assembly

EITO & GLOBAL, INC.

Overseas Exporting Company

Will introduce Robot-Park™ in the U.S. in 2013

A Global Leader in Robotics Development and Manufacturing!

Page 4: Robot park developer final revisions usa version

Eito Systems Company: Product Divisions

Multilayered Automatic

Warehouses

Environmental Instruments Design,

Manufacturing & Sales of

World-Class and High-Value Technology

Products

Factory Automation

Industrial Robots

Page 5: Robot park developer final revisions usa version

Robot-Park Transforms Parking Space Into a High-Profile, High-Profit Differentiator

Robot-Park™ is an elegant technology

solution that creates higher real estate

value for developers and lower

operating costs for building owners,

while delivering an exceptional parking

experience for those parking in

commercial, residential, and municipal buildings

Page 6: Robot park developer final revisions usa version

But first, what’s the problem out there?

...It's so pervasive that we simply endure it!

Page 7: Robot park developer final revisions usa version

Parking: A Bad Situation That’s Getting Worse For Consumers, Residents, Visitors, and Employees, conventional parking structures and lots create both tangible and perceptual problems.

Stressful

Wasted Time

Unsafe

Poor price/ value

Theft Damage Risk

Inconvenient & limited spaces

Increasingly

off-putting experience

that creates negative

perceptions

Page 8: Robot park developer final revisions usa version

Robot-Park Changes the Game

A cost effective, round-structured

and fully automated intelligent

platform for above-ground or

below-ground parking solutions.

Powered by sophisticated

Japanese technology

Page 9: Robot park developer final revisions usa version
Page 10: Robot park developer final revisions usa version
Page 11: Robot park developer final revisions usa version

Solves the parking problem for everyone who parks in a building or a lot Safety, speed, no damage or theft, no stress, clean, reliable, unique high-quality service

engagement, positive perceptions of the building and the destinations therein.

In the first few years,

Robot-Park will be unique and novel.

Then it will become a requirement by tenants, residents, and visitors

and a signature building feature for owners.

Page 12: Robot park developer final revisions usa version

High Aesthetic Value: Day scene

Page 13: Robot park developer final revisions usa version

High Aesthetic Value: Night scene

Page 14: Robot park developer final revisions usa version

Slower & Lower ROI

7

High Operating

Costs

6

Longer Construction Time Frames

5

Low Aesthetic Appeal

4

High Construction

Costs

3

Requires Large &

Expensive Footprint

1

Inefficient Use of Space

2

Conventional Parking Structures Rob Developers of Profit

Challenges for Developers

Page 15: Robot park developer final revisions usa version

More cars are stored resulting in efficient use of narrow plots

Each level accommodates 10 cars

The robot automatically stores the car

Driver enters structure and exits the vehicle, leaving car on the robot platform

How it works for vehicles

Page 16: Robot park developer final revisions usa version
Page 17: Robot park developer final revisions usa version

How it works for you

More Efficient Use of Real Estate

Less Expensive to Operate

Less Expensive to Construct

Less Liability

Green

Secure Investment; Low-Risk, High Return

Higher Real Estate Value

Page 18: Robot park developer final revisions usa version

Round is the shape of profitability.

Round Structure

+ High-strength, streamlined design

+ Earthquake-resistant and quake-absorbing

+ Simple design, yet highly effective and safe

Shorter construction time

+ Round structure

+ Steel module system is fast to construct

+ Pre-fabricated caissons

+ Simple to assemble and easy to dismantle

+ Easy to relocate

Page 19: Robot park developer final revisions usa version

Space Saving: Conventional vs. Round Automated

Problems:

+ Lack of parking

space

+ Inefficient use of

parking space

Page 20: Robot park developer final revisions usa version

Solution: By installing round automated system…

+ The effective car capacity is 3.5 times, while the

construction cost is ¼ of the conventional system

+ System automation provides exceptional and

prompt customer service

+ Dedicated software ensures efficient and speedy

allocation of vacant bays

Problems:

+ Lack of parking

space

+ Efficient use of

parking space

Space Saving: Conventional vs. Round Automated

Page 21: Robot park developer final revisions usa version

Effective space utilization: Less space per car

Page 22: Robot park developer final revisions usa version

Space Saving: Conventional vs. Round Automated

Page 23: Robot park developer final revisions usa version

Above Ground With the Robot-Park above-ground parking solution, towering over head means lower costs.

Page 24: Robot park developer final revisions usa version

Above-Ground Parking: Conventional vs. Automated

Problems:

+ In a conventional system, space for

commercial use used for large parking

spaces

+ Low space utilization

+ Car robbery or vandalism

+ Security in the garage

+ Difficulty of locating car in garage

Page 25: Robot park developer final revisions usa version

Problems:

+ In a conventional system, space for

commercial use used for large parking

spaces

+ Therefore, low space utilization

+ Car robbery or vandalism

+ Security inside the garage

+ Difficulty of locating car in a garage

Solution: By installing round

automated system…

+ Systems vs. people ensure

security in garage

+ Eliminates difficulty of finding car

+ Effective space utilization ensures

more land for commercial

purposes

+ increases value of the property

Above-Ground Parking: Conventional vs. Automated

Page 26: Robot park developer final revisions usa version

Above-Ground Parking: Conventional vs. Automated

Page 27: Robot park developer final revisions usa version

Problems:

+ Requires large project scale with long

construction period

+ Therefore, traffic problems, resulting in

complaints and business loss

+ Low parking efficiency and low space utilization

+ Vandalism, robbery and security leads to

liability concerns

+ Space for parking operators, elevators,

ventilation and fire system required.

+ Startup and operational costs higher

Underground Parking: Conventional vs. Automated

Page 28: Robot park developer final revisions usa version

Solution: By installing round automated system…

+ The construction cost is less than 1/4 of conventional system.

+ Surface land space needed is less than 1/3 of conventional system.

+ Substantially shorter construction period

+ As construction area is smaller, traffic problems are reduced

+ Multiple parking operators unnecessary. Complete automation is

achievable.

+ No people enter underground space, therefore no safety, car

robbery and security issues.

+ Compact design (1 unit accommodates 60 cars). Therefore, solution

for real estate in high population density centers.

Underground Parking: Conventional vs. Automated

Page 29: Robot park developer final revisions usa version

Underground Parking: Conventional vs. Automated

Page 30: Robot park developer final revisions usa version

For 500 cars, 5-8 sets can be implemented

Standard Model: Ø18m system

+ 10 cars/floor; 6 floors; 60 cars

+ Vehicle Dimensions: Length=5m,

Width: 1.9 m, Height: 1.5 - 2.0 m,

Weight: 2.100 kg

+ Offers the best performance to cost

benefits and meets the majority of

global customer requirements

+ 480-car system requires 254m² x 8 =

2,032m² of available land

Custom Model: Ø18m system

+ 10 cars/floor; up to 100 cars/system;

+ Vehicle Dimensions: Length: 5.25 m,

Width: 2.2 m, Height: 2.5 m,

Weight: 2.500 kg

+ Custom sizes can be manufactured but

these would incur additional investment.

+ 100 cars/system x 5 sets = 500 cars.

This 500-car system only requires

254m² x 5 = 1,270m² of available land

Features: Storage

Page 31: Robot park developer final revisions usa version

18 m

Features: Storage

80 cars

Page 32: Robot park developer final revisions usa version

‘Swallows’ one car every 6.0 seconds *The above are estimates. These figures depend on stable

power/voltage ratings & the other factors. Further info can be

found in our “Cycle Duration” sheet.

• ±45 seconds*

To store the car

• ±70 seconds

To retrieve the car

• ±30

Vehicles/hour

*after pressing activation button

Features: Time Savings

Page 33: Robot park developer final revisions usa version

Square Structure

Earth Pressure

Compression

Round Structure

+ High tensile

strength leads

to easy

deformation

+ Thicker walls

+ No tensile

strength

+ Small rate of

deformation.

+ Thinner walls.

vs.

Features: Round Shape Concrete is weak against tensile strength but strong against compression.

Page 34: Robot park developer final revisions usa version

Square Structure

+ Prepare for excavation Excavate

+ Construct (open caisson method)

+ Concrete casting Concrete cure

+ Remove Framework & equipment

vs.

Round Structure

+ Prepare for excavation Excavate

+ Assemble pre-cast segment

+ Excavation & Placement

+ (Repeat) Assemble pre-cast segment

Advantages: Construction Period

Page 35: Robot park developer final revisions usa version

No temporary facility needed,

no extra time for concrete cure,

reduced earth excavation

& Short work duration resulting

in high cost savings

Advantages: Construction Period

vs.

Round Structure

+ Prepare for excavation Excavate

+ Assemble pre-cast segment

+ Excavation & Placement

+ (Repeat) Assemble pre-cast segment

Page 36: Robot park developer final revisions usa version

One circular tower park

±40 cars per hour

+ Loading time of ±1.5 minutes (90

seconds) per car

+ ±400 cars per hour

+ one car every 9 seconds.

Sample Layout: 10 Tower Complex

Page 37: Robot park developer final revisions usa version

Square Round

Area 270 sq. m/level

3780 m3 (18 x15 x14) 100%

240 sq. m/level

3663 m3 (17.5 x 14) 89%

Area per car 27 sq. m (100%)* (60 cars) 24 sq. m (88%)*

Civil cost 3780 x $500* = $1.89 million 3663 x $350*^ = $1.18 million

Civil cost/car $31,500 per car (100%) $19,600 per car (62%)

Center Space

0m3

To be left open for car

movement

3sq.m x 12 x 10 spaces =

360m3/ system (36 fire engine capacity)

Can be utilized as utility room

An Illustration: Comparative Space Utilization 60 Car Parking System in Japan

Page 38: Robot park developer final revisions usa version

Flexible design to meet individual city codes

System hardware, software, electric wiring and components built entirely by Eito & Global

Rigorously tested before shipment

Easy to transport: Requires 2 x 40 ft. containers

Steel frames procured locally for additional cost savings

Automatic & manual operations mode for emergencies

Sales, training and maintenance support

Round outer can be used attractively for advertisements, and can help stimulate commercial in surrounding areas

Other Key Benefits & Features

Page 39: Robot park developer final revisions usa version

Conventional Parking Our parking system

Capacity/ Labor Assumptions

Capacity

Hours of Operation

892

24 / 7

892

24/ 7

Expenses

Payroll & Benefits

Insurance Expenses

Utilities Expenses

Repairs & Maintenance

Bank Fee Expense

Marketing Expense

Support Services Expense

Other Operating Expenses

Subtotal Operating Expenses

Real Estate Taxes Expense

Subtotal Non-Operating Expenses

TOTAL EXPENSES

$850,000

$95,000

$165,000

$145,000

$100,000

$20,000

$75,000

$150,000

$1,600,000

$150,000

$150,000

$1,750,000

$145,000

$50,000

$200,000

$50,000

$100,000

$20,000

$35,000

$75,000

$675,000

$150,000

$150,000

$825,000

Capital Costs

Security Camera/ DVR System

Capital Account

TOTAL CAPITAL COSTS

$30,000

$240,000

$270,000

$30,000

$60,000

$90,000

GRAND TOTAL $2,020,000 $915,000

Operating Expenses: A Comparison

Page 40: Robot park developer final revisions usa version

Increases the Value of Real Estate

Minimum Land Occupation

Efficient Space Utilization

High Aesthetic Value

Less Expensive to Construct (compared to conventional

system) Shorter Construction

Period

Reduced Operation Cost (compared to conventional

system)

Faster Return on Investment

Robot-Park is the Shape of Higher Real Estate Value

Page 41: Robot park developer final revisions usa version

Reduced system downtime

Consistent manufacturing quality

Professional advisory and problem-solving

Reduced failure rate

Extended maintenance support

Our Assurance

Page 42: Robot park developer final revisions usa version

1 year "Full Guarantee" for parking system (robot & steel frame portion)

2 years "Warranty" for parking system (robot & steel frame portion)

*Terms and conditions subject to specific agreement.

Guarantee & Warranty

Page 43: Robot park developer final revisions usa version

EITO&GLOBAL INC.

15-60 Yoshinosakai

Matsuoka, Eiheiji-cho

Yoshida, Fukui

JAPAN

910-1127

USA Phone: +1-214-675-5539

http://www.lombardglobal.com