Top Banner
Risk-based (planning of) official controls & the MANCP outcome of the pilot-WG (November 2011) 1
22

Risk-based (planning of) official controls & the MANCP outcome of the pilot-WG (November 2011) 1.

Dec 28, 2015

Download

Documents

Daisy Lamb
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Risk-based (planning of) official controls & the MANCP outcome of the pilot-WG (November 2011) 1.

Risk-based (planning of) official controls & the MANCP

outcome of the pilot-WG

(November 2011)

1

Page 2: Risk-based (planning of) official controls & the MANCP outcome of the pilot-WG (November 2011) 1.

Quickly ‘share & compare’ main features MANCP?

2

Page 3: Risk-based (planning of) official controls & the MANCP outcome of the pilot-WG (November 2011) 1.

Quickly ‘share & compare’ main features MANCP?

proposal for reference tool: MANCP Quick Scan Form

3

Page 4: Risk-based (planning of) official controls & the MANCP outcome of the pilot-WG (November 2011) 1.

Inspiration

• International Chemical Safety Cards

• Guidance/requirements MANCP (Commission Decision 2007/363/EC)

4

Page 5: Risk-based (planning of) official controls & the MANCP outcome of the pilot-WG (November 2011) 1.

MANCP Quick Scan Form (proposed template)

5

Page 6: Risk-based (planning of) official controls & the MANCP outcome of the pilot-WG (November 2011) 1.

MANCP Quick Scan Form• Summary of main principles & characteristics

(‘appetizer’ for other MS)• Lot of contact data (further bilateral discussions)• 8 boxes

– box 1 & 2: ID & contact data– box 3: main features– box 4: overall objectives– box 5: CA & delegation to control bodies; indication degree

of centralization of competecence– box 6: laboratory network– box 7: official controls & risk factors (box may be repeated)– box 8: any additional information

• 2 pages (?)

6

Page 7: Risk-based (planning of) official controls & the MANCP outcome of the pilot-WG (November 2011) 1.

Risk-based controls as a guarantee for safe feed &

food?

7

Page 8: Risk-based (planning of) official controls & the MANCP outcome of the pilot-WG (November 2011) 1.

Risk-based controls as a guarantee for safe feed &

food?

Food Safety Barometer

8

Page 9: Risk-based (planning of) official controls & the MANCP outcome of the pilot-WG (November 2011) 1.

• Tool for measuring safety in the food chain

• Pressure – State – Response concept

• developed in 1980’s by OECD to classify environmental indicators

Barometer of the Food Chain Safety(Scientific Committee of BE FASFC)

9

Food safety Animal Plant

FASFC ‘scope isSafety of the Food Chain

3 aspects=

3 barometers1 operational, 2 in

development

Page 10: Risk-based (planning of) official controls & the MANCP outcome of the pilot-WG (November 2011) 1.

Selection of Food Safety Indicators

• Biological, chemical, physical hazards• Quantitative measurements • Available in reports, documents & databases • Direct or indirect relation with food safety• NO complete picture of all hazards in the food chain &

NO risk assessment

Set of indicators to provide information on the overall situation of food safety

10

Page 11: Risk-based (planning of) official controls & the MANCP outcome of the pilot-WG (November 2011) 1.

Set of 30 Food Safety Indicators (FSI’s) - Throughout the food chain (‘farm to fork’)- Belgian production chain, intracommunity trade

& import of third countries - Animal and plant production / products- Product controls (biological & chemical

hazards)- Process controls (inspections)- The preventive approach (self-checking

systems, notification, traceability)- Public health issues (restricted to biological

hazards)

Selection of Food Safety Indicators

11

Page 12: Risk-based (planning of) official controls & the MANCP outcome of the pilot-WG (November 2011) 1.

Set of 30 indicators from “farm to fork”

Selection of Food Safety Indicators

Part in the Food Chain Number of FSI’s

Suppliers to the food chain 7

Primary plant production 10

Primary animal production 14

Processing 15

Distribution 12

Consumer 3

Import 8

Storage & transport 7

Services & contract work 2

12

Page 13: Risk-based (planning of) official controls & the MANCP outcome of the pilot-WG (November 2011) 1.

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Inspections self checking Inspections hygiene Inspections traceability

% O

K or

OK

with

rem

arks

2007

2008

2009

2010

Inspections

Measurement of food safety 2007-2010

13

Page 14: Risk-based (planning of) official controls & the MANCP outcome of the pilot-WG (November 2011) 1.

Product analysis : biological hazards

Measurement of food safety 2007-2010

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

% co

nfor

m

2007

2008

2009

2010

14

Page 15: Risk-based (planning of) official controls & the MANCP outcome of the pilot-WG (November 2011) 1.

0,00

10,00

20,00

30,00

40,00

50,00

Salmonellosis Foodborne outbreak Listeriosis

Case

s per

100

000

inha

bita

nts

2007

2008

2009

2010

Foodborne outbreaks and reported cases

Measurement of food safety 2007-2010

15

Page 16: Risk-based (planning of) official controls & the MANCP outcome of the pilot-WG (November 2011) 1.

Impact each FSI perceived by various stakeholders

Assigning a weight to each indicator by expert opinion:SciCom & Advisory Com & Dir Com FASFC

Using Las Vegas method : - assigning 20 chips to 30 indicators - multiple chips/indicator – total 20 chips

Prioritization of the 30 indicators in their impact to measure food safety

16

Page 17: Risk-based (planning of) official controls & the MANCP outcome of the pilot-WG (November 2011) 1.

10 indicators with highest (perceived) relevance• FSI6: Inspections self checking in the food chain 2,06• FSI7: Inspections infrastructure, hygiene in the sectors of distribution, hotels and catering and

community kitchens 1,88• FSI19: Chemical and microbiological hazards in imported animal products intended for human

consumption 1,73• FSI8: Inspections traceability within the food chain 1,65• FSI13: Substances with an anabolic action, unauthorized substances and veterinary drugs for cows

and pigs 1,50• FSI28: Foodborne outbreaks 1,46• FSI17: Residues from pesticides in vegetables and fruit from other EU- countries and third countries

1,39• FSI29: Salmonellosis in humans 1,28• FSI1: Compulsory notification in food safety 1,16• FSI4: Self checking systems in the transformation sector 1,16

Prioritization of Food Safety Indicators

17

Page 18: Risk-based (planning of) official controls & the MANCP outcome of the pilot-WG (November 2011) 1.

State : 2010 versus 2009Status of Food Safety

+ 3.73%

.

18

Page 19: Risk-based (planning of) official controls & the MANCP outcome of the pilot-WG (November 2011) 1.

Food Safety Barometer

19

Page 20: Risk-based (planning of) official controls & the MANCP outcome of the pilot-WG (November 2011) 1.

Food Safety Barometer

20

description tool in MANCP (+ Quick Scan) trends in (Ex. Summ.) AR MANCP

Page 21: Risk-based (planning of) official controls & the MANCP outcome of the pilot-WG (November 2011) 1.

21

More information:

The Barometer of the Safety of the Food Chain: http://www.afsca.be/scientificcommittee/barometer/

Page 22: Risk-based (planning of) official controls & the MANCP outcome of the pilot-WG (November 2011) 1.

22

Thank you for your attention