Response to 2011 State of the Nation Address-ntuane

The Road to Denmark

Response to 2011 State of the Nation address by Leader

of Opposition Hon Botsalo Ntuane

9 November 2011

...every liberal democracy should aspire to emulate

Denmark because it represents the ideal society.

Denmark is a stable, prosperous, inclusive and honest

society. To achieve this a nation must observe three

fundamental elements; of rule of law, accountable

government and a functioning state...

Francis Fukuyama

2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Preamble ......................................................................................................................3

2. The Road to Denmark....................................................................................................4

3. National Reconciliation/Clemency for Civil Servants......................................................5

4. National Dialogue...........................................................................................................7

5. Government and Unions Must Smoke the Peace Pipe.....................................................8

6. Umbrella Party...............................................................................................................9

7. Only the Umbrella Party Can Usher Opposition Victory..................................................10

8. Electoral Reforms.........................................................................................................11

9. Review of the Constitution – Referendum....................................................................12

10. Cultural Revival vs. Tribalism........................................................................................14

11. Parliament –Institutional Reform.................................................................................15

12. Consultative Process....................................................................................................16

13. Local Development......................................................................................................17

14. Socio-Economic Challenges..........................................................................................17

15. Poverty Datum Line and Living Wage...........................................................................18

16. Proposals for Budget 2012...........................................................................................19

17. Hunger and Food Prices...............................................................................................23

18. Economic Empowerment Programmes........................................................................23

19. Resource Ownership and DeBeers Secret Agreement..................................................24

20. Review of Minerals Policy............................................................................................26

21. Beneficiation Policy.....................................................................................................27

22. The Oppenheimer Question........................................................................................27

23. The Chinese Question.................................................................................................28

24. Millennium Development Goals.................................................................................29

25. Vision 2016.................................................................................................................30

26. Foreign Policy.............................................................................................................31

27. Social Commentators..................................................................................................32

28. National Achievers......................................................................................................33

29. Review Entertainment Restrictions.............................................................................34

30. Tribute to Vice President M.S. Merafhe.......................................................................35

31. Bilateral with President Khama....................................................................................36

32. The Road to Denmark..................................................................................................36

3

1. Preamble

Madame Speaker, it is my honour to once more rise in response to the

State of the Nation address delivered by His Excellency in this chamber on

7 November 2011. Since assuming the reigns of Leader of Opposition, this

marks my second time at the podium in the discharge of this, the most

important role of the office I currently hold. There are those who say the

politics of our country have been lethargic since 1965, only springing to

life on 29th

May 2010 with the formation of the BMD, as a consequence of the

historic schism suffered by the governing BDP. Some may wish to dispute

this version of history. But they too will admit that it is on account of that

singular event that we see a legislative chamber much diversified as never

before in our political life. The BDP split not only gave birth to a new, vibrant

movement, but also introduced the phenomenon of independent legislators,

whom we have in numbers unknown since independence. Much as covet

them to join our parties, we do recognize that in a democracy this

arrangement is provided for, and those who wish to exercise this option are

well within their rights. Indeed the events of 29 May 2010 have altered the

complexion of our national politics irrevocably, and I dare say the plot line

will thicken as we go forward because the ramifications of the split are yet to

complete their full course. These observations made, let me take this

opportunity to thank my colleagues in the opposition caucus for their

continued demonstration of faith in my ability, albeit limited, I must say, to

lead their parliamentary affairs. This I say because in terms of Standing Order

7.3 ,the position of Leader of Opposition is held by the majority party.

Following the BMD’s loss of one member in July, we were faced with a

hung opposition bench of five members each , thereby necessitating a fresh

process of nomination to the position. My colleagues, without hesitation and

doubt all resolved to let the incumbent continue steering the ship. I am

humbled by their decision, and deem it worthy to convey my

4

appreciation to them in the hallowed halls of this august assembly. After all I

have no singular entitlement to this position. Anyone of my colleagues is

capable of occupying this position and discharging its functions effectively.

2. The Road to Denmark

Madame Speaker, getting to Denmark defines our role in this house. In his latest

groundbreaking work, The Origins of Political Order, eminent social scientist

Francis Fukuyama ventures that every liberal democracy should seek to

emulate Denmark because it represents the ideal society. Denmark is a stable,

peaceful, prosperous, inclusive and honest society. To achieve this a nation must

observe the three elements of rule of law, accountable government and a

functioning state. We exist to ensure that the three elements are adhered to

because we aspire to the ideal society such as found in Denmark. Every

intervention from our side is meant to get our society to Denmark. Let me

also reiterate that we remain committed to being a patriotic opposition bloc;

loyal to the Republican constitution. We consider ourselves partners in

national development and the consolidation of democratic values in

Botswana. Affirming our loyalty and patriotism does not mean we will

compromise the role expected of us by the nation. We intend to keep the

executive under close scrutiny in discharge of our oversight role. We will be

robust in our endeavor to keep the administration in check. We will hold you

to account, and here allow me to congratulate my colleagues for their

performance in the last meeting of parliament. In recent memory, few recall

the opposition performing its role with such distinction and vigour as we

witnessed. We have set the bar very high for ourselves and aim to redouble

our efforts in this coming meeting. The public, from whom we have been

receiving positive feedback; do not expect any relapse in the quality of our

contributions. On issues we are passionate about; good governance, rule of

law, zero tolerance for corruption and cronyism, an open society, social justice,

respect for human rights , civil liberties, an equal opportunity society and

5

citizen economic empowerment, we shall be unrelenting. In spelling out our

rules of engagement for this session, we call on the governing party to

consider us partners in the terms we have articulated. In the cut and thrust

of parliamentary politics, we shall differ on our approach to some issues, but

as patriots, none lesser than the other, we are bound by the collective desire

to get to Denmark. Madame Speaker, ours are not the politics of slander and

abuse. We aim to be a constructive opposition because we seek what is best for

our country and its people. On issues of national interest and concern, we say

to the president and his government, we are ready to engage and offer

our assistance and input as and when needed.

3. National Reconciliation/ Clemency for Civil Servants

Madame Speaker, on 30th September 2011 our nation celebrated its 45th

year

of independence. I too joined Batswana around the country in

commemorating this auspicious date. At Mosekangwetsi Ward in Gaborone

West South I was given time to address residents gathered to rejoice their

nationhood. In my remarks, I alluded to the content of the president’s

independence message. I highlighted the president’s reference to the

virtues of national unity and how it has been instrumental in realizing,

thus far, the vision of the founding fathers. In my conversation with the

audience, I asked them to reflect on the year 2011 and for them to think

about those of our fellow citizens who are not celebrating on account of

an event still fresh in our minds; the public sector strike. In Latin there is an

expression ánnus horribilis’, meaning a horrible year. There is no doubt that in

our recent history 2011 has been our annus horribilis. We witnessed the

largest public sector strike ever when thousands of public servants

withdrew their labour to press their demands for a 16% increment in

salaries. This strike ran from 20 April to 3rd

June 2011. The strike has now

come and gone, though still under suspension. Many are those who say this

episode in the unfolding story of our country has changed us forever, and

6

Botswana has lost her innocence. This question is an academic indulgence.

What is clear is the impact of the labour action on many of our citizens.

Many are those who did not receive care and service during the course of the

strike. They were gravelly affected. Others are those currently experiencing

hardship and deprivation because they are out of work. The vast majority of

the workers who were protected by the law are back at work. They too have

suffered because going two months without salaries cannot be easy on

anyone. But at least they will have the opportunity to pick up the pieces

and proceed with their lives. But what to do about those who have been

terminated because the employer contends they violated a court order to

return to work? In the wake of the strike our public discourse has been

characterized by recriminations, accusations and counter accusations. This is to

be expected following something as significant as the events in question. We

are aware BOFEPUSO and government are locked in a series of court actions

on issues emanating from the strike. It is not my wish to contest those

matters. My plea, which I made on independence day is for forgiveness and

national reconciliation. Only the foolhardy can deny that the strike and its

aftermath has polarized our society and engendered attitudes of anger and

hostility within the body politic. The government and its allies are angry

about certain aspects of the strike. On the other side of the fence, the union,

its membership and its allies are angry at what they consider the

intransigence and insensitivity of the government. Those who have greater

wisdom have observed that as human beings, in times of anger we find

ourselves caught between our inner demons and our better angels. The wise

say it is when we embrace our better angels that the public good is served

and we emerge more fulfilled. Let us concede that the strike was

unprecedented in its scale, as well as the legal framework within which it was

prosecuted. To this end mistakes were made by both sides because of the

unfamiliarity of the terrain being traversed. My contention is that we can

apportion culpability for the strike and its consequences, but will that address

the plight of dismissed public servants who come to my office, and to your

offices in tears, asking that we plead with the president and his

7

government to forgive them. The latest statistics show that over 700 civil

servants have not been reinstated. About 360 of them, possessing skills our

country needs such as the nursing cadre have resorted to looking for jobs

outside Botswana. All these people are collateral victims of the strike. But no

less significantly they are fellow Batswana who deserve our empathy and the

compassion of their government. We all commit mistakes, and if those who

look up to their government for protection and welfare have erred, surely

the government is much bigger than them and can grant clemency so that we

move on and focus on the overarching project of building a better Botswana.

Let us, as a country draw a line under the whole episode and move on. It is

on this basis that i use this moment to appeal to the president and his

government to pardon civil servants whose services were terminated on

account of their participation in the strike. In my meeting with President Khama

on 7th

November 2011, I conveyed this appeal. I urge all lawmakers in the

name of national reconciliation and forgiveness to support this call for

clemency, healing and a return to normalcy in our country.

4. National Dialogue

Increasingly the need for national dialogue to return the country to

normalcy is finding purchase with the majority of our citizens. Next to the

civil servants strike, other issues have come to the fore which have the

potential to further polarise and destabilise this nation. We are aware of

the disturbing state of affairs in Kgatleng District where there is an

escalating standoff between government and the traditional authority.

This situation cannot be allowed to go on unresolved because with

each passing day we hear reports of incidents that point to a

deterioration in relations. In the meantime it is ordinary Batswana in

Kgatleng District who are caught in the crossfire. They are unable to

receive developmental information and other key messages from

government ministers because the traditional authorities contend they have

8

certain outstanding grievances which must be addressed. Until they are

disposed off it is not the place of this house to pronounce on issues that

are before the courts. It is our place however to call for dialogue

between the government and traditional authorities on those issues

which are not subjudice. We recognise Kgatleng District as an integral

component of sovereign Botswana whose inhabitants deserve all the

services and programmes enjoyed by Batswana. We therefore call on

the government to open dialogue with the traditional authorities, either

directly or initially through emissaries such as the retired presidents or

other traditional leaders. This impasse must be resolved speedily before

matters get out of hand.

5. Government and Unions Must Smoke Peace Pipe

We find it in order to register our concern at the victimisation of the

public sector unions by the government. There have been instances where the

conduct of government gives the impression of hostility against its own

citizens. A case in point is the decision to withdraw certain union benefits

which were agreed upon between employer and employee. Before the strike

the terms of the agreements were honoured to the letter. However in the

post-strike period the government decided to punish the unions by

cancelling the deduction code for subscription fees and loan repayments ;

withholding office accommodation and withdrawing officers seconded to the

unions. This is unacceptable and government would be well advised to refrain

from using strong arm tactics against its own people. Up to now it remains

unclear why the government embarked on its course of action. In the absence

of an explanation we can only surmise that the intention was to punish the

unions for taking part in action recognized under the laws of Botswana. To

show how cynical the whole action was, all unions representing public

servants were affected by the measures, when in fact apart from BOFEPUSO,

the others were not on strike. The government must come out in the open

9

and declare if unions are still permitted to operate in this country. We cannot

afford to send mixed signals to the investor community. They must know

that Botswana is open for business irrespective of the differences between

the government and any sector of society. In a country which professes to

be a leading democratic torchbearer, governance by intimidation and

blackmail is completely at disjuncture with what we profess to be. The

courts should be used as an arbiter of last resort and not a shield by any

sectoral group against a government that enjoys popular legitimacy. Many of

the issues that are before the courts could be resolved if government and

the unions could talk to each other. In the interests of botho and unity as

preached by the president during his address, let us refrain from categorising

those who went on strike as less patriotic citizens. Those workers embarked

on a legal strike sanctioned by the government under the laws of Botswana.

They withdrew their labour just as much as government exercised its right to

withhold salaries. At the end of the day all Batswana are patriotic citizens,

none more than the other, none lesser than the other. Hence we urge

government and the unions to smoke the peace pipe and engage each other in

good faith and out of a spirit of give and take for the benefit of both parties.

The need for a harmonious partnership between government and the unions

cannot be over emphasised because if a long lasting solution to the conflict

is not found, it is innocent Batswana who stand to be affected the most in

terms of inadequate service delivery.

6. Umbrella Party

Beginning December 2010, the world witnessed a series of protests and

demonstrations in parts of North Africa and the Middle East which came to

be known as the Arab Spring. In Tunisia and Eqypt, corrupt and repressive

dictatorships have been toppled by people power. In Libya a long standing

dictator and his family have also been ousted. The ignominious end of

Mummar Gadaffi teaches us that a benign dictator, no matter how well

10

meaning, cannot quench the desire of a people for freedom. In countries

like Yemen and Syria, the ruling establishments are hanging on for dear life as

their day of reckoning beckons. The Arab Spring is ushering change in parts

of the world where democracy was a foreign concept. We have followed the

progress of the Arab Spring we cherish liberty and democracy. We are

friends of those who live under oppression and yearn for freedom. We are

friends of those who advocate good governance and the supremacy of human

rights. In our own country, the opposition has embarked on a national

project to establish an Umbrella Party to contest the 2014 general

elections as a single entity. Lest we are misunderstood, unlike the

revolutionaries of the Arab Spring who were denied democratic space to effect

change, what we seek for Botswana is regime change through peaceful,

legitimate and democratic means at the ballot. To this end the four cooperating

parties of BCP, BMD, BNF and BPP have been meeting over time in pursuit of

the project.

7. Only Umbrella Party can usher Opposition Victory

We stand on the cusp of a golden opportunity as the collective opposition.

The destiny of this country is in our hands. The fate of the ruling party is in our

hands. It is only the opposition that will determine if the BDP is given a new

lease on life or not. As indicated talks aimed at redefining the opposition

political agenda are ongoing and their conclusion is projected for the end of

2011 or in the first quarter of next year. Again let me be honest and

indicate that a process of the kind in which we are involved cannot be

without its difficult moments. Challenges, whether anticipated or not, have

cropped up. But the nature of negotiations is that in the face of challenges,

we should strive to navigate a way towards the destination we have

chosen. That is what our negotiators doing. We all remain mindful of the

weight of expectations our citizens place on this national project. Our

people realize that change is possible as the people of Zambia so ably

11

demonstrated on 20th

September 2011. As the winds of change blow in

southerly direction, Batswana know that change is inevitable in Zimbabwe,

after which, invariably change will come to Botswana. Despite sensational

media reports, we remain supremely optimistic that the negotiations will

reach a fruitful conclusion. Ours is not a fool’s errand because were it so, we

would not have embarked on this mission. Failure is not an option. We must

commit ourselves to delivering the Umbrella. We are faced with two simple

choices; a working Umbrella party or more bleak years in the opposition

wilderness because without one another, the prospects of victory for any one

Party in the collective will remain distant. Hence we are determined to see the

project blossom.

8. Electoral Reforms

As we inch closer to the landmark 2014 polls, we reiterate our demands for

comprehensive electoral reforms. During the session of parliament,

government placed before us a bill which proposes fundamental changes to

the electoral system. The Local Government bill proposes measures to

prohibit floor crossing by both elected and independent councillors. As

opposition we are strongly opposed to the malicious intent of the bill. To

illustrate further malice , the portfolio minister has also tabled a bill to

prohibit floor crossing at parliamentary level. Both measures are meant to

protect the hegemony of the ruling party and stem the flow of defections

from its ranks . Our response to both is that the opportunity has come for

government to engage stakeholders in a national conversation to examine

other areas for reforms. We reject review of the constitution by stealth for

partisan self interest. We say rather let us undertake a comprehensive,

transparent exercise to review our electoral processes and systems, instead

of the piece meal approach which is in no way in the national interest. For

instance we fail to appreciate why party funding should not be part of the

reforms proposed. We fail to understand why with a parliament that is

12

one of seven in Africa with less than 10% of female representatives, the

government cannot bring itself to craft an electoral model that promotes

greater female representation and yet retains the positive features of the First

Past The Post(FPTP). It is regrettable that in this country we do democracy in

thought and not in practice. Let me cite an example. In March this year the

head of state delivered a keynote address at the 5th

Global Electoral

Organisation Conference here in Gaborone. Let me quote what he said on the

issue of gender imbalance; ‘all countries should aspire to ensure that men and

women are equitably involved in democratic structures and processes of their

countries’. Noble sounding words but it is self evident that these are the

thoughts of the president, but with his government they are unable to

translate them into action; a case of democracy in thought, not in practice. To

this end, we intend to kickstart a process of comprehensive electoral reforms

by requesting the convention of the All Party Conference at which a number

of proposals, from all stakeholders will be put on the agenda for discussion

and finalization ahead of the 2014 elections. We need to collectively work

towards ensuring a fair playing field in future polls to address a growing

democracy deficit in Botswana. To this end I will be writing to President

Khama next week proposing an All Party Conference. I trust the response to

our overture will be positive.

9. Review of Republican Constitution- Referendum

Once more we use this occasion to call on government to favourably

consider the demand by sections of our populace for a review of the

national constitution. As a country that still enjoys peace and stability let us

avoid the African syndrome where reforms have been imposed on the ruling

establishment owing to a breach of the constitutional order manifested by

socio-political strife. Being standard bearers of democracy, let us take the

initiative when the environment is still conducive for all concerned. If there

is something government should learn, it is that there are certain fundamental

13

questions which once they occupy the public consciousness will never go

away. In the Arabic tale of Alladin, we learn that once the genie came out of

the bottle, forcing it back inside became am impossible undertaking. The

growing clamour for a review is our genie out of our bottle. This matter will

never go away. It will do government some good to remember the campaign

in the eighties by certain sections of our society for the franchise to be

extended to 18 year olds and for the establishment of the IEC, among others.

Those proposals were rebuffed by government but they grew in frequency

and pitch to a point that a national referendum was called in 1997 for

Batswana to have their say as well. In 2010 when the matter of a

constitutional review was raised in Parliament we were dismissed as displaying

sour grapes because of the outcome of the Gomolemo Motswaledi court

case. Now we have Kgosi Kgolo Kgafela advocating for the same. Instead of

subsiding the voices advocating for a constitutional review will only grow in

tempo and intensity. More individuals and organizations demanding a review

will come to the forefront. Much like before, the calls will grow into a

crescendo and circumstances will force the hand of government to act. Given

that government is resolute in its opposition and the pro review voices are

increasing by the day, we hereby propose a compromise model which will

accommodate the two sides. Admittedly in the state of the nation address

2010, President Khama did go on record stating that constitutional changes

can be effected if a clear domestic consensus emerges around the subject.

Further to that at our bilateral meeting of 4th

November 2011, the president and

I discussed the issue. We have variant views on the way forward. I trust in his

response the Vice President will outline the president’s thinking on this

topical subject. Our view is that a national referendum would be the best way

to gauge public sentiment. Therefore as a responsible opposition and a

partner in democracy and national development, our constructive solution to

this protracted question is for government institute a national referendum to

solicit the views of Batswana to determine if they are favourable to a review of

the Republican constitution of 1966. Let the people decide if they want a

14

review or not. This approach does not prejudice either side and in

democratic society, this is how disputes are settled.

10. Cultural Revival versus Tribalism

In recent times many communities in our country have come up with

initiatives aimed at reviving their cultural practices and embracing their values.

Why we see this growing trend is a matter for speculation. The UNESCO

Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity to which we are signatory is self

explanatory. Every community which seeks to revive and protect its culture

through activities of its choice must be permitted to do so. So far, many of

our communities are actively engaged on this front. Advocates of cultural

revival say not only does it preserve the ways and identity of the

communities concerned, it is also a source of revenue from both domestic

and international tourists. However I want to issue a note of caution. In

giving expression to our cultural heritage, we must guard against those

activities which should be a source of celebration and pride, being hijacked by

tribal chauvinists. Case studies are replete with tribalists exploiting cultural

endeavours as a launch pad for their own agendas, with dire consequences

for society as a whole. Its faults notwithstanding, this country has made

demonstrable progress by embracing a common national identity which has

spared us the strife and upheaval prevalent whose genesis can be traced to

tribal chauvinism. Had we not subordinated our different ethnicities and

ethnocentrism to a common citizenship it is moot whether this country

would have progressed thus far. Ours is a duty to promote national cohesion

and integration because anything else spells regression. Indeed we concur

with the president that as citizens of a democratic republic our loyalty to the

nation should take precedence over ties of ethnicity, tribe or locality. We must

aspire to be Batswana first before we look at ourselves as different ethnic

groups. A national identity with a common set of values as our compass will

translate into unity, economic development and social mobility across the

15

country. Let us emphasize our similarities because they are the glue that holds

us together. At times when those of us who define ourselves as nationalists

raise these matters we are accused of fear mongering and crying wolf. On the

contrary we are only concerned with ensuring that disunity does not take

root in our society; and future generations inherit a Botswana whose peace

and stability we have all enjoyed in our lifetime. They too deserve such a

country.

11. Parliament-Institutional Reform

The mission statement of the Inter Parliamentary Union(IPU) of which our

legislature is a member says strong parliaments create better democracies. This

observation could not be more apt . As a longstanding democracy it is

recognized that as one of the three arms of government, parliament is a key

institution in governance and the management of public affairs. However in

contrast to the Executive and the Judiciary, this arm is disempowered in terms

of resources and institutional capacity. It is not surprising that growing numbers

of our citizens regard parliament with disdain and even contempt. This

situation must addressed before the integrity of parliament is fatally

compromised. We therefore welcome the 2011 Task Force Report of the Study

on the Independence of Parliament. The envisaged raft of reforms are aimed at

enhancing the independence of parliament and rationalizing its functions. Our

note of discordance is the seeming reluctance by some in the executive to

embrace these far reaching changes. Again we want to caution, let us not do

democracy in thought only, but also in practice. We wish to commend the

current Speaker and her capable staff, together with the select group of cross

party Task Force members who put in time and effort to ensure the completion

of this important process. We acknowledge that your predecessors have also

grappled with the issue as far back as 2003 , but Madame Speaker, on top of

reviewing the Standing Orders, now in operation, you have given more legacy to

this august house. The envisaged reforms will be underpinned by the

16

enactment of a Parliamentary Service Act which will be preceded by a broad

consultative process involving among others the Executive and Ntlo ya Dikgosi.

In particular we look forward to the establishment of a Parliamentary Service

Commission(PSC) in line with universal practice, a measure which will ensure

legislators are more effective in carrying out their mandate. Allow me some

indulgence to note the need for building capacity in the Office of Leader of

Opposition. Madame Speaker we urge the swift drafting of the bill for tabling

and our proposed deadline for everything to be wrapped up at the conclusion

of the 2012 Budget Session.

12. Consultative Process

We note that in addition to kgotla meetings, government has introduced

the dipitso system as a consultative forum. All methods aimed at broadening

the scope of consultation are most welcome and Batswana ought to make

full use of them. It is our observation however that dipitso tend to be sector

specific thereby leaving out those who may not fall within the targeted

group. Thee deliberate omission of key stakeholders such as lawmakers is a

concern for concern because as community leaders, many government

initiatives can only take off with their active participation. Members of

parliament should also be allowed to take part in the taking cabinet to the

councils sessions. In our understanding the joint sittings mainly discuss issues

of local governance and service delivery which councillors work on in

conjunction with the area MP. We call on government to revisit the exclusion

of legislators because their contributions to such sessions can be valuable.

With respect to consulting the nation on matters of national interest and

concern, the government should make use of community halls as a venue

for such meetings especially in the urban areas where attendance at kgotla

meetings is problematic due to competing interests.

17

13. Local Development

We subscribe to conventional development policy thinking that

decentralisation is the best avenue for better service delivery and

empowerment of communities. In this context we propose to government to

review her policy of transferring health, education and infrastructural

activities to central government. Government should listen to communities

who are complaining about a deterioration in service levels since this policy

decision was effected. We need a paradigm shift where government thinks

with the people rather than for the people. This policy is a classical case of

thinking for the people and not with the people. As result we witness a

situation where the councils have been disempowered and are unable to

address the daily issues affecting the community. In the same vein

establishment of additional sub districts cannot be viewed as genuine

decentralization when those structures lack the authority to make decisions

on behalf of the people they serve. This government has reversed certain

policies before in response to public outcry, and we strongly believe the same

should be done for this policy.

14. Socio- Economic Challenges

The levels of poverty, inequalities and unemployment still prevalent in our

society make the road to Denmark very difficult to navigate. The level of

poverty remains unacceptably high, so does unemployment rate. We await

the outcome of the Botswana Core Welfare Indicator Survey currently

underway. Though over the years the economy has registered positive growth

figures, with a 5.7 percent growth projected for 2010/11, these levels of

growth are yet to strike a decisive blow against the socio economic

problems just mentioned. As a middle income country, our status must be

reflected in a better quality of life for all our people, without leaving a

significant portion on the margins. A middle income economy should

bring tangible benefits to Batswana. Should we aspire to achieve high income

18

when so many of our citizens are still unable to enjoy their full citizenship

under a middle income economy? The most vulnerable; being the jobless and

unskilled youth, urban and rural poor as well as the female - headed household

require clear cut policy interventions for us to roll back the frontiers of

deprivation and want. That great leap forward cannot be achieved without

tapping on the rich ideas of a cross section of our society. Indeed the

president is correct that government and her functionaries alone cannot have

a monopoly on wisdom. But the government must walk its talk. Open up so

everybody can contribute to proposing the best ideas to address this

societal conundrum in a country as wealthy as ours. For instance, excluding the

opposition from participating in the 2010 Poverty Pitso in Mahalapye negated

the whole objective of poverty eradication because in times of crises all

ideas are worthy of canvassing.

15. Poverty Datum Line and a Living Wage

The PDL defines the level the level of income and consumption that is

sufficient to afford the minimum necessities of life. An individual is classified

as poor if their income falls below the specified threshold. We learn the

Botswana PDL is calculated from the value of a basket consisting five broad

categories of consumer goods; being food, clothing, personal items, household

goods and housing. According to the 2002/03 Household Income and

Survey(HIES) was estimated at P 138.03 per month. Adjusted to the

September 2011 consumer price index gives the individual PDL of P 265.60

per month. This translates into the household mean PDL of P 571.65 per

month. Adjusting this figure to the current prices using September 2011

consumer price index the minimum wage should be approximately P 1099.95.

The wages in the private sector and in the Ipelegeng programme are not

enough on the basis of the figures cited to afford our citizens a decent

standard of living. The purchasing power of the pula has been

progressively eroded. The depreciation of the pula between 2009 and 2011

19

show that P 1.00 in 2009 would now be equivalent to P 0.487 in 2011 and

goods that would have been bought at P1.00 in 2009 would cost P 1.15 in

2011. The housing, water, gas and other fuels group index between January

2009 and September 2011 recorded an increase of 21.9 percent. The food and

non alcoholic beverages index group showed a rise within the same period of

15.8 percent while the transport index shot upwards by 38.4 percent. These

figures give an indication of the heavy burden under which Batswana are

struggling. When we look at inflation rates in SACU member states as

outlined in the August 2011 SACU Inflation Report, Botswana continued to

register the highest annual inflation rate among the member states at 8.7

percent, Swaziland at 6.1 percent, Lesotho at 5.5 percent, Namibia at 5.4

percent and South Africa at 5.3 percent. At current minimum wage rates in

the private sector the lowest worker is paid P 512 per month with the highest

pegged at P 828 per month. We ask of government what is the solution to this

depressing story? Our proposal is for a living wage to be introduced across all

sectors of the economy.

16. Proposals for Budget 2012

In April 2012 the house will consider the estimates for revenue and

expenditure tabled by the Minister for Financé and Development Planning. We

note that the ministry has made laudable efforts at democratizing the

budget by soliciting public views as to what our people want to see

contained in this important national resource allocation exercise. For this

effort we commend Minister Kenneth Matambo whose initiative it is. But

there is still a long way in enhancing budget transparency in Botswana. A

BIDPA policy brief dated September 2011 regrets that our budgetary process

is not open enough. Our position on the Open Budget Index(OBI) shows a

decline over three consecutive years from 2006(65%) 2008(62%) and

2010(51%). As Parliament we need to address this decline in rankings. We are

20

concerned that the contributions by legislators are hardly taken into account.

In the past we have made sound suggestions for inclusion in the budget

and not received any feedback at all. In my response to Budget 2010, we

made some suggestions for consideration, but conceding it was too late

for them to be processed, I hereby wish to retable the proposals so that

the minister can take them forward in his preparation of Budget 2012.

a) Youth Wage Subsidy- the problem of unemployment is chronic and

seems to have affected the youth more than any section of the

population. By way of assisting government come up with measures

to ameliorate the situation we proposed the introduction of a youth

wage subsidy whereby the private sector will be given incentives to

absorb young people and give them training for a set period of time.

We note the existence of the Unemployed Graduate Scheme, which is

discriminatory in that it caters only for university graduates, who are

then let go after a one year period. Our concern is that the scheme

neglects other completers in the education sector right from Form Five

to tertiary level. A youth wage subsidy subject to proper controls is

what we propose to address this dire situation.

b) Pitso ya Letlhoko la Ditiro- it is our contention that no government can

solve the problems of the country without the assistance of its citizens

and other stakeholders. We have proposed a jobs summit(pitso ya

letlhoko la ditiro) where government can engage with private sector

players to explore potential areas of employment creation for our

people.

c) VAT exemption for first time home buyers to encourage young

professionals to invest in home ownership and climb up the property

ladder

d) Introduction of Living Wage- the tools used by the Ministry of Finance to

define and measure the minimum wage are obsolete because they

have no relationship whatsoever to the cost of living experienced on

21

the ground. We propose a review of the method through which the

minimum wage is calculated, and in turn we advocate for a living wage

which will have a direct impact on the quality and cost of living.

e) Constituency Development Fund- the time has come set up a CDF, as

is the practise in many democracies in the Commonwealth. This

scheme is earmarked for constituencies to finance development

projects determined by the community. Development practitioners have

outlined the benefits of a CDF in terms of empowering communities to

define their own developmental priorities in activities where the central

government is not involved. In addition to promoting better local

governance and service delivery, the CDF addresses micro developmental

needs of a specific community with government only having to

concern itself with macro issues which require bigger budgets. The

CDF can also be utilised for job creation, maintenance of basic

infrastructure, youth training, poverty reduction and other small scale

community projects. In our estimation if each constituency were

granted P 2 million each per annum, our constituents would be able to

take active participation in civic affairs fully knowing they have funds

at their disposal with which to improve the communities in which

they live. Though Hon Motlhale has noticed a private members bill

advocating for the establishment of a CDF, this is an idea which should

enjoy the support of every single legislator because it will go a long

way in improving our effectiveness as representatives of the people. By

way of moving forward Parliament should in conjunction with the

Ministry of Finance and Development Planning arrange for a

benchmarking exercises in the Commonwealth to facilitate the inclusion

of the CDF in Budget 2012.

f) Office for Employment Opportunities Abroad- The DPSM should

establish an office solely dedicated to searching for job opportunities

outside the country for Batswana who wish to work as expatriates. We

are of the view that those who have enough job experience can free

22

up positions for others who may not possess the experience to be

place outside. For example, in places like the new Republic of South

Sudan the process of reconstruction has opened up to job opportunities

which under the kind of programme we propose, can absorb many of

our citizens.

g) Tax Review- We reiterate our call for a review and reform of the tax

regime because the various levies and taxes under which the

citizenry is straining has severely eroded household incomes and

standards of living. In the past two years we have been subject to

hikes in VAT, water and electricity tarrifs, national documentation

replacement fees, alcohol prices and many others. For Budget 2012 we

request the portfolio minister to provide the house with a complete

schedule for all taxes levied on Batswana, and indicate relief that will

be extended to ameliorate the suffering.

h) Chinese Dominance- In Budget 2012 we expect the portfolio minister to

unveil a plan by which local companies in the construction sector will

be protected from the unfair competition posed by state owned

Chinese companies. We expect the minister to respond to our proposal

for a quota of projects to be set aside for local companies so as to

revive indigenous companies in this sector.

i) Citizens Budget- in order to render the budget accessible to citizens,

owing to its technical nature we call on the Ministry of Finance to

publish a Citizens Budget which will inform in basic terms and language

the contents of the budget for greater understanding of how

government is spending their money. We therefore call for a Citizens

Budget version to accompany the main Budget Presentation.

23

17. Hunger and Food Prices

As a corollary to our Budget 2012 wish list we note with concern the rise

in food prices which has shown no respite in the last two years. Due to a

squeeze on incomes because of the salary freeze, this situation is affecting

the low income earners and the unemployed more than any group in our

society. The lack of food affects nutrition levels and has a negative impact on

the quality of life of our people. We note the warning by OX FAM that

there is growing hunger in the world on account of price increases. We call on

government to respond to the warning by conducting an urgent study on

the hunger situation in Botswana given the rising cost of food and for

interventionist measures aimed at addressing this looming crisis to be

instituted speedily.

18. Economic Empowerment Programmes

As we note the socio economic confronting our people, we take this

opportunity to urge Batswana to utilise government schemes for economic

empowerment. These schemes are designed to benefit all Batswana and are

not meant for supporters of the ruling party only. We have a duty when we

see more of our people walking the streets jobless and wallowing in poverty

to conscientise and enlighten them about existing programmes through which

they can uplift their standards of living as well as employ fellow citizens. On

both sides of the house, we are united in our quest to get to Denmark. As

opposition we do take issue with some programmes that are ill conceived

and fail to address any clear socio economic objective. That is not to say we

question all government schemes because there are some innovative

programmes which the citizenry should make use of because they are

funded through public resources. Programmes such as CEDA(of which i am a

proud beneficiary) and others have turned around the lives of our people, and

as public representatives it is essential that we assist in increasing the

levels of uptake. If Batswana can use a road built by this government and

24

send their children to schools run by this government, they should not

hesitate to apply for empowerment programmes designed by the very

same government? In any case even if a new government were to assume

office, they are not going to abolish all the programmes initiated by the

outgoing government. As opposition parties we too have our policies which

we believe are better than those of the ruling party. But the fact of the matter

is until we assume power those policies cannot be implemented hence my

call for Batswana to make enthusiastic use of the current programmes.

Batswana, irrespective of political affiliation must contribute to the economic

diversification drive by showing renewed interest in taking up the schemes

under reference. No Motswana should feel ashamed that just because they

belong in the opposition they should not take up government empowerment

schemes. Another legitimate source of empowerment is government tenders

which again we call on our people to make use of. These tenders are not

the exclusive preserve of ruling party functionaries. So, I urge all Batswana to

also try their luck in this sphere.

19. Resource Ownership and De Beers Secret Agreement

Increasingly the question of resource ownership is assuming center stage in

the public consciousness as we endeavour to reach Denmark. Conversely this is

the case in all countries which are experiencing a resource boom, and where

with the rise of the middle class, more assertive voices are posing the

question; what happens to our resources and are we getting the best deal? As

commonly accepted Botswana’s resource boom has transformed the lives of

many of its citizens. We might quibble if the redistribution has been

equitable and fair, but it is only the most incorrigible who can say resources

have done nothing for Batswana. That said we are concerned at the secrecy

shrouding the terms of government’s agreement with De Beers. Questions

have been asked in this house for the minster to disclose to Batswana the

25

exact terms of the deal, all to no avail. An international organisation the

Revenue Watch Index(RWI) which is an independent assessor of transparency

and accountability of revenues in resource rich countries regrets the absence

of sufficient transparency so much so that that it is difficult for citizens to

know if the country is earning its fair share from their diamond resources.

Botswana is ranked 24th

out of 41 countries. In September a new Debswana

Sales Agreement was signed and sealed, yet certain of its terms remain unknown

to us. The question therefore arises; who owns our diamonds; Debeers or

Batswana? If they are owned by Batswana why are we not been told the full

terms of the agreement? Why are legislators whose role is to distribute the

national cake being kept in the dark? This situation is unacceptable and

cannot be countenanced any longer. We don’t know if we are getting the best

deal or not. As a consequence we will embark on a two pronged strategy to

bring the terms of the deal in the open. Strategy one will involve increasing the

frequency of our parliamentary questions on this subject. Strategy 2 will see

us involving the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative(EITI) chaired by

Clare Short, the former British Secretary for International Development in the

Labour government of Tony Blair. This organization sets the global standard

for improved transparency in the mining sector by providing greater

information and accountability to the public who are the owners of the

resources. Our conviction is that this is a viable method to get government to

make available this critical information to the citizenry.

20. Review of Minerals Policy\ Formation of State Mining Company

Still on the contentious issue of resource ownership and extraction, we

recommend a comprehensive review of the Mining and Minerals Act of 1999.

In particular we believe the people of Botswana need to take up a bigger

share of their resources by acquiring more control in all mining activities in

the country. We strongly subscribe to the doctrine of collective ownership of

national resources, particularly finite assets such as minerals. We fail however

26

to comprehend the lack of policy consistency where in the case of Debswana,

foreign investors in the form of Debeers are involved in a joint venture with

the government on behalf of Batswana, and yet in other mining sectors, the

same policy is not applied. Our call therefore is for a minimum 50-50 joint

venture in all mining projects between the state and private investors. For

government to better protect the interests of the nation, the formation of a

state mining company which we proposed in 2010 is long overdue. Among

others, this is necessary because in Zambia the mining sector is being

overhauled after the newly elected government realised that some

companies were misreporting production figures, declaring false losses and

under voicing in order to pay lower taxes and royalties because the

government did not possess the capacity and expertise to oversee the

complex operations. It is against this background that we advocate for the

establishment of a state mining company. This entity will be run by dedicated

professionals unlike the current scenario where technocrats from other various

ministries sit on mining company boards and are expected to monitor highly

complex activities in an industry which the world over, has not covered itself

in glory in so far as honest dealings are concerned. Let us draw lessons from

other countries on how they have been able to superintend their resources for

the benefit of their people.

21. Beneficiation Policy

The president reported that the performance of the minerals sector

continues to improve and growth and diversification in this sector expected to

drive the economy forward. We are heartened by the positive news, but call

on government to adopt a more ambitious strategy with respect to

beneficiation. Botswana needs to extract more value from beneficiation of

the mineral resources which are so critical to getting us to Denmark. The

current minerals policy does not spell out, nor place any obligation on mining

companies to beneficiate in the country. Instead of exporting jobs by allowing

27

many of our commodities to be exported as raw products, the government

should draw up a beneficiation policy which should be done in conjunction

with mining companies. If the state does not compel mining companies to

undertake beneficiation projects, they will not make any effort on their own

given that they have never shown any inclination to do so. The new policy

should compel any company operating in Botswana to furnish the state with a

beneficiation strategy; and this should be applicable to all mining sectors with

clear targets on minimum produce to be beneficiated locally. We contend that

in this way the economy will be diversified and much needed jobs will be

created.

22. The Oppenheimer Question

Madame Speaker though it is early days in the new deal where the

Oppenheimer family decided to sell out of De Beers, we suspect there is more

to this abrupt development than what as partners we are being told. It

certainly raises eyebrows how a family that has been running De Beers for

three generations could simply give it all up, especially if, as we were told the

long term prospects for the diamond industry remain attractive. So soon after

signing the new Debswana Sales Agreement with the government, why are the

Oppenheimers quitting? Do they know something the government of Botswana

does not know? We urge government to monitor the situation closely

because this move could be an expression of concern over the state of the

diamond market. There is even speculation that the 10 year Sales Agreement

could be the reason for the Oppenheimers decision. In the industry

publication Diamond Intelligence Briefs, a certain Chaim Even Zohar reveals that

the agreement contains a clause allowing Botswana to re-negotiate the

contract in the event that control in De Beers changes hands. Now that control

has changed hands, what does it mean for us as a country? At the risk of

sounding like conspiracy theorists, could this be a strategy for De Beers to

28

wiggle out of the agreement in order for new terms to be re-negotiated which

may reduce the benefits due to Botswana as per the original contract. What

does this all mean for the migration of all rough diamond sales functions from

London which was earmarked for 2013? Another pertinent question that arises

is if we enjoyed a casting vote with our 15% shareholding in De Beers

Holdings, with Anglo American at 45 % and the Oppenheimer family holding 40

% what happens to the boardroom equation with Anglo American now holding

85% and the Botswana government still holding its now decidedly insignificant

shareholding? We learn from within the industry that Botswana government

can participate in the transaction by hiking its shareholding to 25%. Is that

what government intends to do? Madame Speaker, as you can tell there are

all kinds of questions and ramifications and the nation needs to be appraised

in more detail. This is a critical matter on which we will be constantly

demanding answers from the government because we have grounds for

deep concern given the secretive nature of the agreements signed between

government and De Beers over the years.

23. The Chinese Question

In 2010 I highlighted the problem of poor labour relations practised by

Chinese companies, both in the construction and retail sectors. This is a matter

we will continue to raise until the situation is rectified through self

correction or robust government intervention. It would amount to abdication

of duty if as representatives of the people we remained silent to the

oppressive working conditions, low wages, importation of locally available skills

and other ills visited upon our people by the Chinese. We want to warn the

government that its counterpart in Zambia recently lost power with the

Chinese question playing a decisive role. With regard to shoddy workmanship,

uncompleted projects and perennial cost overruns we demand to know how

many Chinese companies have been blacklisted in line with the policy outlined

by the head of state in the state of nation 2009. On the Chinese question we

29

will spare no quarter and will continue to demand robust action from

government. As a matter of fact the head of state acknowledged in Maposa

village on 12 October 2011 that the issue of Chinese labour practises had

become a permanent feature at his kgotla meetings. We therefore expect a

more rigorous enforcement of labour laws at all Chinese run projects.

24. Millenium Development Goals

As a constructive opposition we will give credit where it is due because only

through an honest discussion of views about the status of our country can

we reach Denmark. In particular we want to highlight the progress made

towards achieving the Millenium Development Goals. Among others Botswana

is among only 6 African countries which have fulfilled the commitment to

allocate a minimum 15% of the budget to the health sector. Botswana is also

among only 8 countries with a malaria death rate of less than 10 per 100,

000 population. Botswana also enjoys the accolade of the ‘gold standard of

ARV programming with coverage of 90% compared to 7.3 % in 2003 and 63

% in 2005. On ARV provision we urge government to bring access closer to

the people, particularly in remote areas. It is also commendable that we are on

track to achieve universal primary education by 2015. These are clear

indicators of progress and it is for the whole nation to strive to do even

more to achieve all the targets of the MDG’s.

25. Vision 2016

Although we recognise the president’s address cannot contain every single

aspect of our national life, we believe there has been a gross omission

with respect to Vision 2016. Only five years remain before we reach the

historic milestone and the nation needed a report back as to the progress

made towards achieving the 7 Vision Pillars. Where are we, and how much

work still needs to be done in attaining;

30

a. an educated and informed nation

b. a prosperous, productive and innovative nation

c. a compassionate, just and caring nation

d. a safe and secure nation

e. an open, democratic and accountable nation

f. a moral and tolerant nation

g. a united and proud nation

Madame Speaker these pillars are the sign posts that will get us to Denmark.

It is vital for the nation to know what is expected from each one of us to

realise Vision 2016. Our expectation is that the Vice President will provide

greater clarity when he responds to our observations. On a positive note we

note the public outreach programme on which the Vision Council has

embarked. For Vision 2016 to hold any relevance to our people, it must be

taken to every part of the country especially the rural areas. Otherwise it will

remain a subject of academic discourse and glitzy cocktail receptions in

Gaborone.

26. Foreign Policy

Lately Botswana has assumed a more vocal role in international affairs. In

principle we have no objection to our country which has a record of

achievements in key human development indices also making its voice

heard in international affairs. We are concerned however by a foreign policy

which seems to be founded more on whim and personal considerations than

following a set of clearly defined principles. For example right from the onset

we adopted the correct stance on Zimbabwe especially after the 2008

elections. How then does a country that proclaims its commitment to good

31

governance and human rights then turn around and fail to condemn atrocities

visited on the people of Malawi by President Mutharika when his security

services shot and killed 18 unarmed demonstrators in July 2011. There must be

consistency in our foreign policy pronouncements so that we remain credible

and maintain our standing in the community of nations. We therefore call for

the drafting of a foreign policy green paper which should then be brought to

the house for legislators to make an input. The views of civil society,

academics and other citizens should also be canvassed to craft a foreign

policy that will realign our national interests to the geo political challenges of

today’s evolving world. We also wish to issue a plea for the government of

Botswana to monitor the deteriorating situation in Zimbabwe. We fear that

reports of escalating political violence and intimidation are returning the

country back to the situation of 2008 during the presidential run- off

election. Any eruption of widespread violence in Zimbabwe has grave

consequences for Botswana because of the influx of people seeking a safe

haven across the border. The situation where political rallies addressed by

the MDC, a legitimate party which is part of the GNU are disrupted cannot

auger well for a free and fair poll and Botswana must act in haste and

collaborate with the international community to ensure Zimbabwe does not

return to those dark days. Madame Speaker our Swaziland policy flies in the

face of the values espoused by the head of state regarding our adherence

to universal values and support for democracy and respect for human rights.

Swaziland is the an anachronism in this part of the world in so far as

democracy, accountability, human rights and good governance are

concerned. The defence put up by Hon Phandu Skelemani that the people

of Swaziland chose the political dispensation under which they live is

contestable and the only test of whether that is indeed the case can only

be achieved through a free and fair democratic process; which is what we

call for. As a valuable member of the Commonwealth, we cannot turn a

blind eye about events in Uganda where once again we see a former fighter

for liberation turning on his own people in a campaign of brutality and

repression waged against the opposition leader Dr Kizza Besigye and his

supporters. We call on government to join the chorus of condemnation

against President Yoweri Museveni, because it is the ethical and correct course

of action. In any case he has overstayed in office; it is time he took graceful

leave before plunging Uganda into violence and communal strife.

32

27. Social Commentators

When Botswana receives glowing tributes from international organizations,

there is a tendency to believe that only they can validate our democratic

credentials. This cannot be further from the truth. Democracy finds validation

and acceptance first and foremost from those who live under the system. We

hold divergent views on the most ideal form of democracy we should

practice. This is perfectly normal and it is a lively debate in every country

which has some form of democracy. Scholars say this is not the best system

for governing but they also concur that all others are worse, and hence

democracy has become a universal value. Without any inhibition whatsoever I

can proclaim that in spite of its shortcomings we live in a democracy. The

accolades in which we bask are largely deserved. The challenge is for us not

to regress, and to carry on debate on forging the most ideal form of

democracy, acceptable to the majority of our people. This is work that is in

progress every single day. This work cannot be the preserve of practicing

politicians alone. Democracy is not owned by us; it is owned by the entire

society which subscribes to its tenets and values. Next to the citizens, civil

society, including the media are the cornerstone of democracy everywhere. It

is no different here. In recognition of the role of others in validating our

democracy I wish to pay tribute to the public commentators of our country

who through their writings make us a better country and a better democracy.

They too want us to get to Denmark. These are men and women whose names

evoke mixed emotions depending where one stands on a given topic.

Whether we agree with them or not, they enjoy our recognition for their

contributions to thinking and debate in Botswana. Without exception these are

masters of word craft who enrich our public discourse in no small measure.

Without prejudice, let me acknowledge leaders in thought and opinion like

Sandy Grant, Sonny Serite, Spencer Mogapi, Dan Moabi, Mike Dingake, Beata

Kasale, Mesh Moeti, Lawrence Oookeditse, Kenneth Dipholo, Jeff Ramsay and

others. We say carry on the good work. Praise us and condemn us in equal

33

measure for as long as it is for the good of our country. Tribute must also go

to our private radio stations for providing a platform for spirited debate on

national issues. We do not have to agree with them all the time. But the likes

of Don Seberane, Kealeboga Dihutso, Tshepo Ntshole, Reginald Richardson,

Justice Motlhane, David Moepeng, Phenyo Moroka are but some of the private

radio anchors at the forefront of our national conversations.

28. National Achievers

For a small nation with our population size, Botswana has done remarkably

well on the international front, be it in sports or other cultural/artistic

activities such as beauty pageants. Every victory by a fellow citizen is a

victory for all Botswana. We are still revelling in the fantastic performance of

Amantle Montsho at the World Athletic Championships in Daegu and the All

Africa games in Maputo. In our 2010 response we recognized the

achievement of the Zebras in qualifying for AFCON 2012 and also the feat

registered by Emma Wareus for being first runner up at the Miss World

contest in China. We applaud the government, specifically the Ministry of

Youth, Sports and Culture for the assistance it has rendered to

representatives flying our flag high at international events. Our commendation

notwithstanding let us not celebrate only the winners. Let us see the ministry

and Batswana also supporting the efforts of our representatives who do not

end up on the winner’s podium. Such support will encourage them to do

even better next time. Recently Karabo Sampson competed in the Miss World

contest and earlier Motlatsi Kgabo at the Miss Universe contest. Was anybody

from the ministry at the airport to welcome them back? I bet not. If we have

achieved so much it means the potential is there to do even better by

setting up talent scouting and grassroots development programmes across

the country. We however want to warn against any temptation to politicise

national achievements for partisan benefit. For the ruling party to claim

paternity for these success stories would undermine their value in the eyes of

34

Batswana. All our citizens must celebrate our icons without anyone feeling

alienated because of their political affiliation. If politics is the source of

societal division, then our icons should be the patriots who bring us together

in national unity and collective pride. Like all Batswana we look forward with

keen anticipation to the Zebras maiden appearance at Afcon 2012 and urge

Batswana to rally as one behind the behind the team.

29. Review of Entertainment Restrictions

We note the policy of government to promote arts and culture, as evidenced

by a number of activities mentioned by the president, including the

establishment of a Regional Arts and Crafts Centre in Tsabong. The appeal to

Batswana to refrain from buying pirated products is also useful because this

practice affects the livelihood of artistes who depend on sales of their

intellectual property. If there is recognition on the part of government that the

arts can be source of economic sustenance for those involved in the

industry, we believe the time has come to review the restrictions that have

negatively impacted on the live music industry such as the operating hours of

nightclubs and other entertainment venues. The view of the music industry

is that restrictive hours affect patronage, putting a lot of artistes out- of -

work to swell the ranks of our unemployed. In addition a hostile attitude to

entertainment by the government has affected domestic tourism with many

local revellers crossing the border to South Africa every week end thereby

promoting tourism in that country and creating jobs for its citizens. By way of

finding a solution we propose the implementation of the resolutions of Pitso ya

Ngwao which addressed these concerns, including the establishment of a

Botswana Arts Council to coordinate activities of the performing and visual arts

sector. On a promising note there seems to be fewer incidents of gun toting

security personnel roaming about harassing private citizens enjoying

functions in their homes. In a free and open society there is no need for such

strong arm conduct by security agencies towards the citizenry.

35

30. Tribute to Vice President MS Merafhe

On the road to Denmark, many will be those who contribute to the success of

the mission. If we all apply ourselves in pursuit of the common good, we

will arrive at this destination. It is fitting that in this journey we pause to

pay tribute to those who since the dawn of our nationhood have made

sacrifices towards national development. Hence I, too take this opportunity to

congratulate the honourable vice president Lt. Gen. M.S. Merafhe following

bestowment on him of Naledi ya Botswana on 7 November 2011. Of the

many who started serving this country in the pre independence era, Rraetsho

Merafhe falls in the category of those whose contributions to the building of

modern Botswana are traceable and solid. Right from humble beginnings in

the protectorate police service to his pioneering role in setting up the

nascent BDF , and subsequently to his various roles as an executive member

of the government in various portfolios, Rraetsho Merafhe has rendered

remarkable national service to his nation. Every nation must recognise and

honour its best and illustrious because it is through such gestures that we

commit their contributions to posterity and national memory. Let every

gallant son and daughter of this soil who deserves honour, be recognised

accordingly. Rraetsho your award is richly deserved . During this proud

moment let us also recognise the need to honour others who have no

association with the ruling establishment but as patriots have made solid

contributions to national advancement.

31. Bilateral with President Khama

It would be remiss if I did not acknowledge my meeting with President Khama

on 4 November 2011. The meeting, though long overdue should be a matter

of course in a republican democracy where government functions with the

active participation of the opposition. We discussed a variety of subjects and

36

in our exchange of notes I proposed some solutions to the issues the

country is currently grappling with. On some issues, such as a referendum to

review the constitution we disagreed, in amicable terms and with the president

offering a counter proposal. On others such as national unity and re-

employment of civil servants we shared a broad consensus without

necessarily going into specific details. The president has indicated that meetings

of such a nature ought to take place on a more regular basis, as and when

necessary. On my part I acknowledged that as opposed to a permanent stand-

off, at times, engagement and dialogue , are other avenues that can provide

solutions to issues concerning our country and its citizens.

32. The Road to Denmark

On a final note let me remind colleagues in this chamber that ours is a rare

privilege to be occupying these seats in service of our nation. We must always

be mindful that the hopes and aspirations of so many Batswana rest on us.

We are here out of a sense of civic duty and because our dream is to see

our people attain Denmarkness. If, in our debates, questions, motions and

other interventions we evoke Denmark as seen by Francis Fukuyama; then,

anchored on the pillars of rule of law, accountable government and a

functioning state we will achieve the ideal society; stable, peaceful, prosperous,

inclusive and honest.

End.

37