Top Banner
REL103;01202004 Slide 1 Reliability Predictions The objective of a reliability prediction is to determine if the equipment design will have the ability to perform its required functions for the duration of a specified mission profile. Reliability predictions are usually given in terms of fails per million hour or Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF).
25

REL103;01202004 Slide 1 Reliability Predictions n The objective of a reliability prediction is to determine if the equipment design will have the ability.

Mar 29, 2015

Download

Documents

Jase Winterton
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: REL103;01202004 Slide 1 Reliability Predictions n The objective of a reliability prediction is to determine if the equipment design will have the ability.

REL103;01202004Slide 1

Reliability Predictions

The objective of a reliability prediction is to determine if the equipment design will have the ability to perform its required functions for the duration of a specified mission profile.

Reliability predictions are usually given in terms of fails per million hour or Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF).

Page 2: REL103;01202004 Slide 1 Reliability Predictions n The objective of a reliability prediction is to determine if the equipment design will have the ability.

REL103;01202004Slide 2

Reliability Predictions

Besides their obvious use to predict reliability, reliability predictions are used to support many other analyses such as:

– Spares

– Failure Mode Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA)

– Fault Tree

– Warranty

– Performance Based Logistics (PBL)

Why are Spares so important?

Page 3: REL103;01202004 Slide 1 Reliability Predictions n The objective of a reliability prediction is to determine if the equipment design will have the ability.

REL103;01202004Slide 3

Reliability PredictionsSpares Why do you need spare boards or boxes? Why not just fix

the ones that fail?

You do fix the ones that fail, but that takes time. The equipment is unavailable while the repair is made.

Spares allow the equipment to be made available more quickly.

The Reliability Prediction determines how many spares will be needed to meet the customers availability requirements.

Operational Availability (Ao) is often a key customer requirement.

– Ao = System Up Time / Total Time or

– MTBF/(MTBF + MTTR + MLDT)MTTR = Mean Time To Repair

MLDT = Mean Logistics Delay Time

Page 4: REL103;01202004 Slide 1 Reliability Predictions n The objective of a reliability prediction is to determine if the equipment design will have the ability.

REL103;01202004Slide 4

Reliability Predictions

There are many methods to predict the reliability of a system including:

– MIL-HDBK-217

– Telcordia (Bellcore)

– PRISM

– Physics of Failure

– Comparative Analysis

Page 5: REL103;01202004 Slide 1 Reliability Predictions n The objective of a reliability prediction is to determine if the equipment design will have the ability.

REL103;01202004Slide 5

Reliability Predictions

MIL-HDBK-217, "Reliability Prediction of Electronic Equipment”

– The original reliability prediction handbook published by the Department of Defense, based on work done by the Reliability Analysis Center and Rome Laboratory

– Contains failure rate models for the various part types used in electronic systems, such as ICs, transistors, diodes, resistors, capacitors, relays, switches, connectors, etc.

– Failure rate models are based on field data obtained for a wide variety of parts and systems. This data was analyzed and many simplifying assumptions were thrown in to create usable models.

Page 6: REL103;01202004 Slide 1 Reliability Predictions n The objective of a reliability prediction is to determine if the equipment design will have the ability.

REL103;01202004Slide 6

Reliability Predictions

MIL-HDBK-217 includes mathematical reliability models for nearly all types of electrical and electronic components. The variables in these models are parameters of the components such as number of pins, number of transistors, power dissipation, and environmental factors.

MIL-HDBK-217 contains two methods of performing predictions.

– Parts Count - normally used early in the design and is based on anticipated quantities of parts to be used

– Parts Stress – normally used later in the design and is based on the stresses applied to each individual part

Page 7: REL103;01202004 Slide 1 Reliability Predictions n The objective of a reliability prediction is to determine if the equipment design will have the ability.

REL103;01202004Slide 7

Reliability Predictions

MIL-HDBK-217 Parts Count Prediction

– The general mathematical expression for equipment failure rate with this method is:

Equip = Total equipment failure rate

g = Generic failure rate for the ith generic part

Q = Quality factor for the ith generic part

Ni = Quantity of the ith generic part

n = # of different generic part categories in equipment

Equip = Ni(gQ)i

i=n

i=1

Page 8: REL103;01202004 Slide 1 Reliability Predictions n The objective of a reliability prediction is to determine if the equipment design will have the ability.

REL103;01202004Slide 8

Reliability Predictions

MIL-HDBK-217 Parts Count Prediction Example

– A new RF amplifier board for use in an external pod mounted radar for a fighter aircraft is anticipated to use 46 insulated film (RLR, MIL-R-39017) resistors of established reliability category “R”. Determine the portion of the failure rate due to these resistors.

Page 9: REL103;01202004 Slide 1 Reliability Predictions n The objective of a reliability prediction is to determine if the equipment design will have the ability.

REL103;01202004Slide 9

Reliability Predictions

Page 10: REL103;01202004 Slide 1 Reliability Predictions n The objective of a reliability prediction is to determine if the equipment design will have the ability.

REL103;01202004Slide 10

Reliability Predictions

MIL-HDBK-217 Parts Count Prediction Example

– A new RF amplifier board for use in an external pod mounted radar for a fighter aircraft is anticipated to use 47 insulated film (RLR) established reliability level “R” resistors. Determine the portion of the failure rate due to these resistors.

Res(RLR) = Ni(gQ)

Res(RLR) = 47 X (.033 X .1)

Res(RLR) = .1551 fails/million hoursNOTE: This is the failure rate associated with only this type

of resistor. To get the complete failure rate for the

board, the failure rates for all other resistor types and

for all other components would have to be added.

Page 11: REL103;01202004 Slide 1 Reliability Predictions n The objective of a reliability prediction is to determine if the equipment design will have the ability.

REL103;01202004Slide 11

Reliability Predictions

MIL-HDBK-217 Parts Stress Prediction

– For this method, different types of parts (resistors, capacitors, microcircuits, etc.) and different classes of parts of the same type (memory, microprocessors, etc.) have different failure rate equations.

– A separate failure rate is determined for each part based on the stresses applied to that part. These failure rates are added to determine the total failure rate for the unit being analyzed.

p = (C1T + C2E)Q L

Microprocessor

p = (C1T + C2E + cyc)Q L

DRAMp = b RQ E

Fixed Film

Resistor

Page 12: REL103;01202004 Slide 1 Reliability Predictions n The objective of a reliability prediction is to determine if the equipment design will have the ability.

REL103;01202004Slide 12

Reliability Predictions

MIL-HDBK-217 Parts Stress Prediction Example

– Reference Designator R6 (133 ohm, RLR, MIL-R-39017, established reliability level “R”) on an RF amplifier board for use in an external pod mounted radar for a fighter aircraft has been shown to operate at 48 C at 30% of its rated power. Determine the portion of the failure rate due to this resistor.

MIL-HDBK-217 Parts Stress equation for this type of part is:

p = b RQ E

Page 13: REL103;01202004 Slide 1 Reliability Predictions n The objective of a reliability prediction is to determine if the equipment design will have the ability.

REL103;01202004Slide 13

Reliability Predictions

Page 14: REL103;01202004 Slide 1 Reliability Predictions n The objective of a reliability prediction is to determine if the equipment design will have the ability.

REL103;01202004Slide 14

Reliability Predictions

Page 15: REL103;01202004 Slide 1 Reliability Predictions n The objective of a reliability prediction is to determine if the equipment design will have the ability.

REL103;01202004Slide 15

Reliability Predictions

MIL-HDBK-217 Parts Stress Prediction Example

– Reference Designator R6 (133 ohm, RLR, MIL-R-39017, established reliability level “R”) on an RF amplifier board for use in an external pod mounted radar for a fighter aircraft has been shown to operate at 48 C at 30% of its rated power. Determine the portion of the failure rate due to this resistor.

R6 = b RQ E

b = .0011

R = 1.0

Q = 0.1

E = 18

R6 = .0011 X 1.0 X 0.1 X 18 = .00198 fails/million hours

Page 16: REL103;01202004 Slide 1 Reliability Predictions n The objective of a reliability prediction is to determine if the equipment design will have the ability.

REL103;01202004Slide 16

Reliability Predictions

Telcordia (Bellcore)

– Originally developed by Bell Labs

– Bell Labs modified the equations in MIL-HDBK-217 to better represent what their equipment was experiencing in the field.

– Tends to be a lot more forgiving of nonmilitary parts than MIL-HDBK-217

– Methodology is very similar to MIL-HDBK-217 – If you know how to use one, you can use the other.

Page 17: REL103;01202004 Slide 1 Reliability Predictions n The objective of a reliability prediction is to determine if the equipment design will have the ability.

REL103;01202004Slide 17

Reliability Predictions

Now for the Bad News

– Opinions of both of these methods (MIL-HDBK-217 and Telcordia) are very low in many quarters.

– Both have very poor track records predicting actual field performance though they may be useful in making comparisons between competing system designs.

The biggest strength of both of these methods is that they provide a recognized systematic methodology which minimizes the need to make “judgments”; however, …

This strength lasts only as long as customers continue to “recognize” these methods as valid and this situation is changing with some customers prohibiting their use. In addition, whether “recognized” or not, the basic problem remains - these methodologies provide poor answers for a critical question.

Page 18: REL103;01202004 Slide 1 Reliability Predictions n The objective of a reliability prediction is to determine if the equipment design will have the ability.

REL103;01202004Slide 18

Reliability Predictions

PRISM

– Modification of MIL-STD-217

– Attempt by RAC to overcome some of MIL-STD-217’s problems

– Does not include models for all commonly used devices

– Provides the ability to update predictions based on test data

– Addresses factors such as development process robustness

– Values of individual factors are determined through an extensive question/answer process to judge the extent that measures known to enhance reliability are used in design, manufacturing and management processes.

Page 19: REL103;01202004 Slide 1 Reliability Predictions n The objective of a reliability prediction is to determine if the equipment design will have the ability.

REL103;01202004Slide 19

Reliability PredictionsPRISM

– Mil-HDBK-217 and Telcordia address only part failures

– PRISM introduces the use of “process grades”

– PRISM allows 2 types of predictions

Inherent reliability Logistics model

• PRISM software reliability prediction tool developed by the Reliability Analysis Center (RAC)

Mfg Defect15%

No Defect12%

Design9%

Wearout9%

Part Defect22%

Sys Mgmt4%

Induced20%

Software9%

Failure Cause Distribution for Electrical Systems

(Based on RAC Survey)

• PRISM uses a model consisting of additive and multiplicative terms

• Based on failures/106 calendar hrs

– Clndr Hrs = Op Hrs / Duty Cycle

• PRISM accounts for failure sources in addition to part failures

Page 20: REL103;01202004 Slide 1 Reliability Predictions n The objective of a reliability prediction is to determine if the equipment design will have the ability.

REL103;01202004Slide 20

Reliability PredictionsPRISM

Sys Fail Rate = (component failure rates) x process grade factor

– RACRate model

• Microcircuits • Transistors

• Diodes • Thyristors

• Capacitors • Resistors

• Software

– RAC data

• Electronics Parts Reliability Data

• Nonelectronic Parts Reliability Data

– User-defined data

– Process grades in 9 areas• Parts • Design• Induced • System Mgmt.• No-defect •

Manufacturing• Wearout • Infant Mortality• Reliability Growth

Page 21: REL103;01202004 Slide 1 Reliability Predictions n The objective of a reliability prediction is to determine if the equipment design will have the ability.

REL103;01202004Slide 21

Reliability PredictionsPRISM Failure Rate Models

P(Inherent) = IA (PIME + DG + MIMEG + SG +W + SW

System-level process grade multiplier(approximately 1.0 for “average” processes)

P(Logistics) = IA (PIME + DG + MIMEG + SG +I + N + W + SW

Software notincluded in Raytheonevaluation

Parts Design Manufacturing SystemMgmnt

Wearout

I Induced process grade factor

N No-defect process grade factor

Software failure rate (RACRates software model, RAC Data, or user-defined data)SW

Manufacturing process grade factorMParts process grade factorP

Process Multiplier / Definition

W

S

Wearout process grade factorPRISM reliability growth modelG

Design process grade factorD

PRISM environmental factorE

System management process grade factorPRISM infant mortality modelIM

Initial failure rate assessment (sum of RACRates, RAC data, and user defined data)IA

Predicted failure rate of the systemP

Failure Rate / Definition

Software failure rate (RACRates software model, RAC Data, or user-defined data)SW

Manufacturing process grade factorMParts process grade factorP

Process Multiplier / Definition

W

S

Wearout process grade factorPRISM reliability growth modelG

Design process grade factorD

PRISM environmental factorE

System management process grade factorPRISM infant mortality modelIM

Initial failure rate assessment (sum of RACRates, RAC data, and user defined data)IA

Predicted failure rate of the systemP

Failure Rate / Definition

Page 22: REL103;01202004 Slide 1 Reliability Predictions n The objective of a reliability prediction is to determine if the equipment design will have the ability.

REL103;01202004Slide 22

Physics of Failure (PoF)

– Attempt to identify the "weakest link" of a design to ensure that the required equipment life is exceeded

– Generally ignores the issue of manufacturing defect escapes and assumes that product reliability is strictly governed by the predicted life of the weakest link

– Models are very complex and require detailed device geometry information and materials properties

– In general, the models are more useful in the early stages of designing components, but not at the assembly level. 

Reliability Predictions

Page 23: REL103;01202004 Slide 1 Reliability Predictions n The objective of a reliability prediction is to determine if the equipment design will have the ability.

REL103;01202004Slide 23

Reliability PredictionsComparative Analysis

Predictions based on field data for similar products can be very useful, but suffer from the following problems.

– Accurate field data is often not available

– Usually requires making engineering judgments (to compensate for different operating environment, failures that now have C/A in place, etc.)

This is the preferred method if good data exists.

Page 24: REL103;01202004 Slide 1 Reliability Predictions n The objective of a reliability prediction is to determine if the equipment design will have the ability.

REL103;01202004Slide 24

Reliability PredictionsComparative Analysis

WRA MTBF SourceANT 3210 APA RadarPPS 4513 APA RadarSDC 6200 APA RadarRSCI 1300 ZPAR RadarXMTR 1815 APA RadarREP 1021 X20 radarRSC 1100 X20 radar

ABX Radar System 256 Rollup

WRA MTBF SourceANT 3210 FieldPPS 4513 FieldSDC 6200 FieldRSCI 6212 FieldXMTR 1513 FieldREP 985 Field

ABA Radar System 395 Rollup

Modified by removing failures with C/A in place.

WRA MTBF SourceANT 3400 FieldPPS 3500 FieldSDC 6200 FieldRSCI 1300 FieldXMTR 675 Field

ZPAR Radar System 334 Rollup

WRA MTBF SourceAESA 3400 FieldPPS 3500 FieldREP 1513 FieldRSC 1324 Field

PROC 6200 FieldX20 Radar System 464 Rollup

Modified to account for moresevere ABX environment.

Example:MTBF Prediction for ABX Radar

Page 25: REL103;01202004 Slide 1 Reliability Predictions n The objective of a reliability prediction is to determine if the equipment design will have the ability.

REL103;01202004Slide 25

Reliability Predictions

Summary

– A number of different methods exist for predicting reliability.

– No prediction method is without its problems.

– The Reliability Engineer together with the supportability IPT must pick the best method or combination of methods for his program.