Top Banner
Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark evices for Dissonance:
70

Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

Mar 26, 2015

Download

Documents

Lucas Farrell
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk

Daniel Beunza & David Stark

Devices for Dissonance:

Page 2: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

Dissonance

Dissonance fosters discoveryby prompting reflexivity.

Page 3: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

Dissonance

Dissonance fosters discoveryby prompting reflexivity.

Disagreement about what is valuablemakes it possible to discover new resourcesof value.

Page 4: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

How do traders deal with the fallibility of their models?

Page 5: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

In the literature, disasters are traced to the behavior of traders, depicted as

1) reckless

Page 6: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

In the literature, disasters are traced to the behavior of traders, depicted as

1)reckless

and as

2) overly cautious (“herding”)

Page 7: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

Processes that provoke doubtcan lead to overconfidence

Page 8: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

Reflexivity about Models

Page 11: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

“I apologize.”

Page 12: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

“I apologize.”

[a performative speech act]

Page 13: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

Performativity in economic sociology:

Financial models are not representations. They are interventions that format, shape, perform markets. Their use brings new economic objects (markets) into being.

Models are market making.

Page 14: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :
Page 15: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :
Page 16: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :
Page 17: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

“This is the way that people get from point A to point B.”

Page 18: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :
Page 19: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

A model is performative when its use increases its predictive capabilities.

Page 21: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :
Page 23: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :
Page 24: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

A financial model is not a representation;

Page 25: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

A financial model is not a representation; it is an intervention.

Page 26: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :
Page 27: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :
Page 28: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

The arbitrage traders we studied do the same.

Page 29: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

The trading room is populated with devices for doubt.

Traders do not simply use models and devices that perform the market. They also create and use devices for reflexivity.

This reflexivity is not exterior to (or above) the structures of socially distributed calculation but is an integral part of it.

Page 30: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

Arbitrage is a (reflexively) skilled performance.

And this reflexivity is not of the individualbut is social and material.

Page 31: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

Epistemic challenges of using models in arbitrage

Page 32: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

Methodological constraint: a single morning at a single desk in an abritrage trading room.

Page 33: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

Calculation in merger arbitrage involvesthe dissonance between two sets of probability estimates:

1) probability estimates derived at the desk using proprietary models, databases, and instrumentation.

2) “implied probablity” – the aggregate probability estimates of the trader’s rivals

Page 34: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :
Page 35: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

a given trading desk makes probability estimates based on models, proprietary databases, and instrumentation

Page 36: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

V= (1-)PNS +PS

Page 37: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :
Page 38: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

The trader’s models and instrumentation are powerful scopes for viewing the markets.

Page 39: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

But scopes that reveal can also conceal. If you take your model for granted, you can lose your shirt.

Page 40: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

To avoid cognitive lock-in, the traders turn to socio-technical networks outside the trading room.

Page 41: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

relation between the trader and his rivals

Page 42: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :
Page 43: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :
Page 44: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :
Page 45: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :
Page 46: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :
Page 47: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :
Page 48: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

The spread plot in merger arbitrage

Page 49: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

The spread plot is a representation of an economic object that does not have a price and is otherwise not observable, co-produced by the positioning of actors who use it to confront their interpretations and re-evaluate their positions.

Page 50: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

time

$

Target

Acquirer

Decoding the spread plot

“Backing out” implied probability

Page 51: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

The spread plot instantiates the diversity of dispersed anonymous actors.

Page 52: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :
Page 53: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :
Page 54: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

dissonance

Page 55: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

Reflexive modeling

Dissonance disrupts.

It prompts reflexivity.

Each of the (materially mediated) relations provokes reflexivity about the other.

Page 56: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :
Page 57: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

?

Page 58: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

re-search

Page 59: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

Reflexive modeling

Differs from ‘herding’

Here, dissonance prompts re-search

Page 60: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

Reflexivity is not self-awareness or conceptual transcendence.

So as not to be captive of an epistemic trap, traders use devices for dissonance.

Page 61: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :
Page 62: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

?

Page 63: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

?

?

Page 64: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

WARNING

Page 65: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

WARNING

The same devices for doubt can also be devices for overconfidence, leading to arbitrage disasters.

Page 66: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

The strength of reflexive modeling is based on the fact that it leverages the cognitive independence among dispersed and anonymous actors.

Page 67: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

The strength of reflexive modeling is based on the fact that it leverages the cognitive independence among dispersed and anonymous actors.

But this same process suggests the possibilities of cognitive interdependence among the rival traders in the professional arbitrage community.

Page 68: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :

Just as reflexive modeling can typically be a source of correction, so this same cognitive interdependence among traders can, in rare but dramatic instances, lead to the amplification of error.

Page 69: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :
Page 70: Reflexive Modeling and Systemic Risk Daniel Beunza & David Stark Devices for Dissonance :