1 3. Reduce waste and support recovery and recycling
1
3. Reduce waste and support recovery and recycling
22
3. Reduce waste and support recovery and recycling
Water use intensity at FPAC member pulp and paper mills dropped almost 6% between 2005 and 2007, for a total reduction of nearly 20% since 1999.
3
Recycling Leadership and Momentum
3
In 2003, members committed to increase recovery rate to 55% by 2012
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Recovery Rate
64.6%
Source: PPPC
44
3. Reduce waste and support recovery and recycling
Air emissions: Between 1999 and 2007, releases of total particulate matter per tonne of output decreased by 65% .
Source: FPAC Member Survey
55
3. Reduce waste and support recovery and recycling
Air emissions: Between 1999 and 2007, the amount of total reduced sulphur (TRS) released per tonne of output decreased by 60%.
Source: FPAC Member Survey
6
4. Reduce greenhouse gases and help fight climate change
77
Deforestation worldwide results in up to 17,4% of global human-caused
GHG emissions (IPCC).
In comparison, deforestation caused less than 3% of the total GHG
emissions in Canada (NRCan 2008a).
88
4. Reduce greenhouse gases and help fight climate change
“Reduced deforestation and degradation is the forest mitigation
option with the largest and most immediate carbon stock
impact in the short term per ha and per year globally.”
“In the long term, sustainable forest management strategy,
aimed at maintaining or increasing carbon stocks, while producing
an annual sustained yield of timber, will generate the largest
mitigation benefit”.
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
IPCC, Working Group III, chapter 9, page 549-50.
9
4. Reduce greenhouse gases and help fight climate change
“ Promoting forest restoration and sustainable forest
management has more promise for mitigating climate
change than narrowly focusing on reducing greenhouse gas
emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD).”
“Overcoming deforestation using policy and economic
tools is much less feasible than promoting carbon uptake
by overcoming forest degradation and restoring forest and
agricultural landscapes.”
– R. Michael Martin, Director of the Forest Economics and Policy Division, Forestry Department, FAO
Unasylva 230, Vol. 59, 2008
1010
Virtually no deforestation
Canada’s rate of deforestation is less than 0.02% and is not due to logging.
Source: NRCan 2008a, Global Forest Watch
53%
19%
10%
10%8%
Agriculture
Urban development, transportation, and recreation
Hydroelectricity
Forests roads
Industry and resource extraction
Causes of deforestation in Canada for 2005
11World Resource Institute. 2007a. Forest Extent: Forest area (current) as a percent of original forest area; World 1996.
Baseline – 8000 Years ago
United Kingdom
France
Chile
United States
Malaysia
Indonesia
Brazil
Russian Federation
Finland
Sweden
Norway
Canada
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
6%
17%
41%
60%
64%
65%
66%
69%
82%
86%
90%
91%
Forest as a % of Original Forests (1996) (2009)
±90%
4. Reduce greenhouse gases and help fight climate change
1212
Pulp & Paper Mills Performance
-70
-50
-30
-10
10
30
1990 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
GH
G E
mis
sio
ns
Pe
rce
nt c
ha
ng
e, 1
99
0-
FPAC P&P
Kyoto Target
National Overall Trend
-57%
- 6%
Source: FPAC Energy Survey 1990-2007; Environment Canada. National Inventory Report: Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Canada, 1990-2007.
+34%
13
Forest Sector GHG Emissions
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
Total energy use (petajoules) GHG emissions (million tonnes)
Year
Pe
tajo
ule
s
Mil
lio
n t
on
ne
s
Source: CCFM 2006d
14
Forest Sector GHG Emissions
• Forestry and Logging (NAICS 113); • Support Activities for Forestry (NAICS 1153); • Paper Manufacturing (NAICS 322), which includes pulp, paper, and
paperboard mills; and • Wood Products Manufacturing (NAICS 321).
• GHG emissions in 2002 were unchanged from 1980.• 23% increase in energy use but significant improvements in energy
efficiency producing more output per unit of energy used.• Greater reliance on cleaner fuels helped to limit growth in both
energy use and emissions. • Production of pulp and paper increased by over 30%.
Source: CCFM 2006d
15
Forest Sector GHG Emissions and Energy use
• GHG emissions in 2002 were unchanged from 1980.• 23% increase in energy use
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
Total energy use (petajoules) GHG emissions (million tonnes)
Pe
tajo
ule
s
Mil
lio
n t
on
ne
s
Source: CCFM 2006d
16
Forest Sector Energy Sources
• Greater reliance on cleaner fuels
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Bioenergy Fossil Hydro and nuclear
Pe
tajo
ule
s
Source: CCFM 2006d
1717
4. Reduce greenhouse gases and help fight climate change
For pulp and paper manufacture, FPAC members reduced their greenhouse gas emissions intensity by 7% between 2005 and 2007 for a long-term reduction of 61% between 1990 and 2007.
Source: FPAC Energy Monitoring Report 1990-2007
19
90
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
-70%
-60%
-50%
-40%
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
Greenhouse Gas Emissions IntensityFPAC Members (pulp and paper facilities)
(percentage improvement from 1990 levels)
18
49%56% 58%
22%
25% 26%30%
16% 15%
0% 2% 1%0%
25%
50%
75%
1990 2005 2007
Biomass
Net Electricity Purchases
Fossil Fuels
Other (Net) Purchases
18
4. Reduce greenhouse gases and help fight climate change
Percentage of Energy from Biomass - FPAC Members(Pulp & Paper Facilities)
Source: Sustainability Report 2009 (under press)
19
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
19
90
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
GJ/
ton
ne
19
4. Reduce greenhouse gases and help fight climate change
Pulp and paper mills improve their energy intensity by 5% between 2005 and 2007 for a long-term reduction of 22% between 1990 and 2007.
Source: FPAC Energy Monitoring Report 1990-2007
Energy Intensity FPAC Members(pulp and paper facilities)