Top Banner
Real Estate Development Planning | Xue Wood 1 WORKING SAMPLE Xue Wood, Planner 332 W Indiana Ave., St. Joseph, MO P: 646.401.4320 I E: [email protected] Memo To: J. Smith, Director of Planning From: Xue Wood, Planner Date: November 23, 2011 Re: Recommended Action by the City for the Preservation of the Rainbow Building Recommended: That the City negotiate with the developer of the Rainbow Building on the basis of rehabilitating the building to a standard that will qualify the project for the use of Historic Rehabilitation Tax Credits. This may require city intervention to ensure that operating losses are covered and recognition that a change in ownership is likely within the first five years of operation. A developer has proposed to demolish the Rainbow Building and to build 50 units on the site. Objections to the demolition were voiced. As an alternative, the developer proposes to preserve some of the building and to construct 46 units, mixing new construction and rehabilitation. This analysis shows that, if the developer will rehabilitate the building to a standard that will qualify the structure for Historic Rehabilitation Tax Credits, the developer will realize a higher return on investment despite the fact that only 42 units could be accommodated in this alternative. The table below summarizes the investment performance of the different development alternatives. Investment Performance of the Development under Alternative Scenarios Alternative Units Equity Required Maximum IRR-AT Maximum ROE Year Sale New Construction 50 $1,156,250 8.3% 1.0% 8+ Mixed New/Rehab 46 $1,150,000 7.5% -0.8% 8+ Historic Rehabilitation 42 $413,400 22.3% -14.6% 4 Each of the three development alternatives has been analyzed in terms of its investment performances. Only the new construction alternative generates a positive cash flow at any time during the development’s operation. The Historic Rehabilitation alternative fails to generate a positive cash flow, which will necessitate an operating reserve funded by the owners to cover these losses over the years of operation. The mixed-new construction and rehabilitation alternative does not generate a positive cash flow through eight years of operation. Only the new construction alternative generates a sufficient return on equity from operating the property that the developer will be interested in the long-term maintenance of the property. This suggests that the City must stand ready to assist in the maintenance of the property over time. However, the alternative involving the use of Historic Rehabilitation Tax Credits has several advantages, and one problem:
5

Real Estate Development-Memo writing

Mar 23, 2016

Download

Documents

Xue Wood

This is a classwork. The work conducted an analysis of the investment performances according to a real estate rehabilitation project.
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Real Estate Development-Memo writing

Real Estate Development Planning | Xue Wood 1

WORKING SAMPLE Xue Wood, Planner

332 W Indiana Ave., St. Joseph, MO P: 646.401.4320 I E: [email protected]

Memo To: J. Smith, Director of Planning

From: Xue Wood, Planner

Date: November 23, 2011

Re: Recommended Action by the City for the Preservation of the Rainbow Building

Recommended: That the City negotiate with the developer of the Rainbow Building on the basis of rehabilitating

the building to a standard that will qualify the project for the use of Historic Rehabilitation Tax Credits. This may

require city intervention to ensure that operating losses are covered and recognition that a change in ownership is

likely within the first five years of operation.

A developer has proposed to demolish the Rainbow Building and to build 50 units on the site. Objections to

the demolition were voiced. As an alternative, the developer proposes to preserve some of the building and

to construct 46 units, mixing new construction and rehabilitation. This analysis shows that, if the developer will

rehabilitate the building to a standard that will qualify the structure for Historic Rehabilitation Tax Credits,

the developer will realize a higher return on investment despite the fact that only 42 units could be

accommodated in this alternative. The table below summarizes the investment performance of the different

development alternatives.

Investment Performance of the Development under Alternative Scenarios

Alternative Units Equity

Required Maximum IRR-AT

Maximum ROE

Year Sale

New Construction 50 $1,156,250 8.3% 1.0% 8+ Mixed New/Rehab 46 $1,150,000 7.5% -0.8% 8+ Historic Rehabilitation 42 $413,400 22.3% -14.6% 4

Each of the three development alternatives has been analyzed in terms of its investment performances. Only

the new construction alternative generates a positive cash flow at any time during the development’s

operation. The Historic Rehabilitation alternative fails to generate a positive cash flow, which will necessitate

an operating reserve funded by the owners to cover these losses over the years of operation. The mixed-new

construction and rehabilitation alternative does not generate a positive cash flow through eight years of

operation. Only the new construction alternative generates a sufficient return on equity from operating the

property that the developer will be interested in the long-term maintenance of the property. This suggests

that the City must stand ready to assist in the maintenance of the property over time. However, the

alternative involving the use of Historic Rehabilitation Tax Credits has several advantages, and one problem:

Page 2: Real Estate Development-Memo writing

Real Estate Development Planning | Xue Wood 2

The tax credits will generate funds at the beginning of the project reducing the amount of equity the

developer will have to acquire. The developer’s cash equity requirement will fall from over

$1,100,000 with the new construction and mixed construction alternatives, to about $413,000 plus

another $240,000 to cover operating losses during the first four year of operation with the historic

rehabilitation alternative. This should appeal to the developer.

The after tax internal rate of return will be higher with the Historic Rehabilitation alternative, peaking

at 22 percent. Unfortunately, this IRR will decline quickly over time, unlike the other alternatives

(Please see the following chart). This means that the developer will want to sell the property in order

to realize the highest possible profit. This could be as early as the 4th year after the completion of

construction. As a result, the City should anticipate that it will have to work with a different ownership

for this project only a few years after its rehabilitation. The City can strengthen its position by having

a right-of-first-refusal on the property with ongoing control over its management.

Chart Comparing Investment Performance of Three Development Alternatives

Attachment: Data Used in the Analysis of Alternative Development Proposals

Item Alternative

New Cons. His. Rehab Mixed

Residential units 50 42 46

Residential rents per month for year one 800 875 850

Resid. rent inflation per year 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%

Resid. vacancy loss per year 5.0% 5.0% 5.0%

Operating expenses per unit for year one $4,000 $4,500 $4,250

Operating expenses inflation per year 4.5% 6.5% 5.0%

Total development costs 4,625,000 4,620,000 4,600,000

Land value 675,000 500,000 675,000

New construction costs 3,950,000 0 2,000,000

Rehab costs 0 4,120,000 1,925,000

Loan to value ratio 75.0% 75.0% 75%

Market interest APR compounded monthly 7.0% 7.5% 7.25%

Loan term in years 30 30 30

Appreciation of property value per year 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%

Selling costs as percent of value 4.5% 4.5% 4.5%

Capital gains tax rate of owner 15% 15% 15%

Recapture Rate on Depreciation 25% 25% 25%

Income tax rate of owner 28% 28% 28%

Syndication net proceeds 90%

Page 3: Real Estate Development-Memo writing

Real Estate Development Planning | Xue Wood 3

Page 4: Real Estate Development-Memo writing

Real Estate Development Planning | Xue Wood 4

Page 5: Real Estate Development-Memo writing

Real Estate Development Planning | Xue Wood 5