Top Banner
Quality Function Deployment Introduction Quality Function Deployment Definition & Characters of QFD Tools of QFD House of Quality & Quality Charts Case Study Applications & Advantages
35
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Quality Function Deployment

Quality Function Deployment

•Introduction Quality Function Deployment•Definition & Characters of QFD•Tools of QFD•House of Quality & Quality Charts•Case Study • Applications & Advantages

Page 2: Quality Function Deployment

QFD – Basic Definition & Need

Integrating customer requirements into product designQuality: Meeting the specifications & satisfying customersFunction: Action that forms quality & satisfies the needsDeployment: Step-by-step incorporation of that Action

Users and customers of products or services usually have fairly good ideas as to what they expect:

A car should not rust, should start in all weather conditions, should be economically on petrol, be versatile in the arrangements of seats, etc. – Until the QFD principles were developed, it was fairly normal that new products would be developed after the likes, dislikes and technical ideas of the developers, with not enough attention paid to the production process, servicing and last but not least to the real expectations of the customers. – A famous example is the Ford “Edsel” model of the 1950s, of which only a few 100 were sold, contrary to the millions which had been anticipated.

Page 3: Quality Function Deployment

Introduction to QFD QFD is a comprehensive quality system that

systematically links the needs of the customer with various business functions and organizational processes, such as marketing, design, quality, production, manufacturing, sales, etc., aligning the entire company toward achieving a common goal.

A method to transform user demands into design quality, to deploy the functions forming quality, and to deploy methods for achieving the design quality into subsystems and component parts, and ultimately to specific elements of the manufacturing process.

Dr. Yoji Akao originally developed QFD in Japan in 1966, when the he combined his work in quality assurance and quality control with function deployment used in value engineering.

Page 4: Quality Function Deployment

QFD provides a system of comprehensive development process for: Understanding 'true' customer needs from the

customer's perspective What 'value' means to the customer, from the

customer's perspective Understanding how customers or end users become

interested, choose, and are satisfied Analyzing how do we know the needs of the customer Deciding what features to include Determining what level of performance to deliver Intelligently linking the needs of the customer with

design, development, engineering, manufacturing, and service functions

Intelligently linking Design for Six Sigma (DFSS) with the front end Voice of Customer analysis and the entire design system

Page 5: Quality Function Deployment

WHAT DOES QFD DO? Better Designs in Half the Time

QFD is a Productivity Enhancer

Page 6: Quality Function Deployment

Why Does QFD Work?

PROCESSDESIGN PRODUCTION

PRODUCTDESIGN

IMPROVEPRODUCT

TIME HIGH VISIBILITYHIGH REWARD

LOW VISIBILITYLOW REWARD

The Quality LeverThe Quality Lever

1:1

10:110

0:1

Page 7: Quality Function Deployment

Tools of QFD•Affinity Diagrams•Relation Diagrams•Matrices and Tables – House of QualityI. Prioritization, Relationship, Responsibility Matrices•Analytical Hierarchy Process•Hierarchy Trees•Production Design Program Diagrams•Blueprinting

QFD

STATISTICALPROCESS CONTROL

DESIGN QUALITY

VALUEENGINEERING

Page 8: Quality Function Deployment

The Houseof Quality

Quality Function Deployment’sHouse of Quality

CustomerPerceptions

RelationshipsbetweenCustomer NeedsandDesign Attributes

Imp

orta

nce

Ran

king

s

CustomerNeeds

DesignAttributes

Costs/Feasibility

Engineering Measures

CorrelationMatrix

12

3

4

5

6

7

8

Establishes the Flowdown Relates WHAT'S & HOW'S Ranks The Importance

Page 9: Quality Function Deployment

QFD Matrix

Absolute Weight and Percent

Prioritized Technical Descriptors

Degree of Technical Difficulty

Relative Weight and Percent

Target Value

Cu

sto

me

r R

eq

uir

em

en

ts

Pri

ori

tize

d

Cu

sto

me

rR

eq

uir

em

en

ts

Technical Descriptors

Primary

Pri

ma

ry

Se

co

nd

ary

Secondary

TechnicalCompetitiveAssessment

Cu

sto

me

rC

om

pe

titi

ve

As

se

ss

me

nt

OurA’sB’s

Cu

sto

me

r Im

po

rta

nc

eTa

rge

t V

alu

eS

ca

le-u

p F

ac

tor

Sa

les

Po

int

Ab

so

lute

We

igh

tOu

rA

’sB

’s

Relationship betweenCustomer Requirements

andTechnical Descriptors

WHATs vs. HOWs

StrongMediumWeak

+9+3+1

Strong PositivePositiveNegativeStrong Negative

+9+3-3-9

Interrelationship betweenTechnical Descriptors

(correlation matrix)HOWs vs. HOWs

Page 10: Quality Function Deployment

Two Types of Elements in Each House

Key Elements Informational

Elements

Th

e H

ou

se o

f Q

uali

ty

Page 11: Quality Function Deployment

QFD Flowdown

Customer Wants

Technical Requirements

Part Characteristics

Manufacturing Process

Production Requirements

ManufacturingEnvironment

ManufacturingEnvironment

Customer Wants

Product Functionality

System Characteristics

Design Alternatives

SoftwareEnvironment

SoftwareEnvironment

Customer Wants

Service Requirements

Service Processes

Process Controls

ServiceEnvironment

ServiceEnvironment

Flowdown Relates The Houses To Each Other

Le

vels

Of

Gra

nula

rity

Page 12: Quality Function Deployment

Building the House of Quality1. Identify Customer Attributes – What’s2. Identify Design Attributes / Requirements –

How’s3. Relate the customer attributes to the design

attributes.4. Conduct an Evaluation of Competing Products.5. Evaluate Design Attributes and Develop

Targets.6. Determine which Design Attributes to Deploy in

the Remainder of the Process.

Page 13: Quality Function Deployment

1. Identify Customer Attributes• These are product or service requirements IN THE

CUSTOMER’S TERMS. • Market Research• Surveys• Focus Groups.

• “What does the customer expect from the product?”

• “Why does the customer buy the product?”• Salespeople and Technicians can be important

sources of information – both in terms of these two questions and in terms of product failure and repair.

• OFTEN THESE ARE EXPANDED INTO Secondary and Tertiary Needs / Requirements.

Page 14: Quality Function Deployment

Need 1Need 2Need 3Need 4Need 5Need 6Need 7

Key E

lem

ents

-

“Wh

at'

s”

Voice of the Customer

What's

What's

What Does The Customer Want

Customer Needs CTQs Ys

Page 15: Quality Function Deployment

5534241

Key E

lem

ents

:

Cust

om

er

Requir

em

ents

Voice of the Customer

How Important the What’s are TO THE CUSTOMER

Customer Ranking of their Needs

Customer

Importa

nce

Customer

Importa

nce

Need 1Need 2Need 3Need 4Need 5Need 6Need 7

Page 16: Quality Function Deployment

2. Identify Design Attributes.

• Design Attributes are Expressed in the Language of the Designer / Engineer and Represent the TECHNICAL Characteristics (Attributes) that must be Deployed throughout the DESIGN, MANUFACTURING, and SERVICE PROCESSES.

• These must be MEASURABLE since the Output will be Controlled and Compared to Objective Targets.

• The ROOF of the HOUSE OF QUALITY shows, symbolically, the Interrelationships between Design Attributes.

Page 17: Quality Function Deployment

HO

W 1

HO

W 2

HO

W 3

HO

W 4

HO

W 5

HO

W 6

HO

W 7

Key

Ele

men

ts -

“H

ow

’s”

Satisfing Customer NeedsSatisfing Customer Needs

How Do You Satisfy the Customer What’s

Product Requirements Translation For Action X’s

HowsHows

WHAT'S HOW'S

Need 1Need 2Need 3Need 4Need 5Need 6Need 7

5534241

Page 18: Quality Function Deployment

Info

rmatio

n –

Corre

latio

n M

atrix

Conflict ResolutionConflict Resolution

Impact Of The How’s On Each Other

Strong PositivePositiveNegativeStrong Negative

Correlation MatrixCorrelation Matrix

Need 1Need 2Need 3Need 4Need 5Need 6Need 7

5534241

H

H

H

H

L

M

M

M

MM

M L

L L

L

LH

OW

1

HO

W 2

HO

W 3

HO

W 4

HO

W 5

HO

W 6

HO

W 7

57 41 48 13 50 6 21

65

45

21

36

8

52

43

lbs

12

in.

3 m

ils

40

psi

3 8 a

tm

1 m

m

Page 19: Quality Function Deployment

3.Relating Customer & Design Attributes Symbolically we determine whether there is NO

relationship, a WEAK one, MODERATE one, or STRONG relationship between each Customer Attribute and each Design Attribute.

The PURPOSE it to determine whether the final Design Attributes adequately cover Customer Attributes.

LACK of a strong relationship between A customer attribute and any design attribute shows that the attribute is not adequately addressed or that the final product will have difficulty in meeting the expressed customer need.

Similarly, if a design attribute DOES NOT affect any customer attribute, then it may be redundant or the designers may have missed some important customer attribute.

Page 20: Quality Function Deployment

Key

Ele

men

ts:

Rela

tion

ship

Untangling The WebUntangling The Web

Strength of the Interrelation Between the What’s and the How’s H Strong

9 M Medium

3 L Weak

1 Transfer Function Y = f(X)

H

H

H

H

L

M

M

M

MM

M L

L L

L

LRelationships

Relationships

Need 1Need 2Need 3Need 4Need 5Need 6Need 7

5534241

HO

W 1

HO

W 2

HO

W 3

HO

W 4

HO

W 5

HO

W 6

HO

W 7

Page 21: Quality Function Deployment

5. Evaluate Design Attributes of Competitive Products & Set Targets.

This is USUALLY accomplished through in-house testing and then translated into MEASURABLE TERMS.

The evaluations are compared with the competitive evaluation of customer attributes to determine inconsistency between customer evaluations and technical evaluations.

For example, if a competing product is found to best satisfy a customer attribute, but the evaluation of the related design attribute indicates otherwise, then EITHER the measures used are faulty, OR else the product has an image difference that is affecting customer perceptions.

On the basis of customer importance ratings and existing product strengths and weaknesses, TARGETS and DIRECTIONS for each design attribute are set.

Page 22: Quality Function Deployment

Info

rmati

on

: H

ow

M

uch

3 lb

s

12

in.

3 m

ils

40

psi

3 8 a

tm

1 m

m

Consistent ComparisonConsistent Comparison

Target Values for the How’s

Note the Units

How MuchHow Much

Need 1Need 2Need 3Need 4Need 5Need 6Need 7

5534241

H

H

H

H

L

M

M

M

MM

M L

L L

L

L

HO

W 1

HO

W 2

HO

W 3

HO

W 4

HO

W 5

HO

W 6

HO

W 7

57 41 48 13 50 6 21

65

45

21

36

8

52

4

Page 23: Quality Function Deployment

Info

rmati

on

:Targ

et

Dir

ect

ion

The Best DirectionThe Best Direction

Information On The HOW'S More Is Better Less Is Better Specific Amount

HO

W 1

HO

W 2

HO

W 3

HO

W 4

HO

W 5

HO

W 6

HO

W 7

Target

DirectionTarget

Direction

Need 1Need 2Need 3Need 4Need 5Need 6Need 7

5534241

H

H

H

H

L

M

M

M

MM

M L

L L

L

L

57 41 48 13 50 6 21

65

45

21

36

8

52

4

Page 24: Quality Function Deployment

36

45

36

45

1

6

15

M

99

12 4

5 5

3

2

57 41 48 13 50 6 21

Key

Ele

men

ts:

Tech

nic

al

Imp

ort

an

ce

Ranking The HOW'SRanking The HOW'S

Which How’s are Key Where Should The Focus Lie “CI” = “Customer Importance” “Strength” is measured on a 9, 3, 1,

0 Scale

Technical Im

portance

Technical Im

portance

TI = Scolumn(CI *Strength)

CINeed 1Need 2Need 3Need 4Need 5Need 6Need 7

534241

HO

W 1

HO

W 2

HO

W 3

HO

W 4

HO

W 5

HO

W 6

HO

W 7

Page 25: Quality Function Deployment

H

H

H

H

L

M

M

M

MM

M L

L L

L

L

65

45

21

36

8

52

4

Key

Ele

men

ts :

Com

ple

ten

ess

Have We Captured the HOW'S

Are All The How’s Captured Is A What Really A How

Completeness Crit

eria

Completeness Crit

eria

CC = Srow

(CI *Strength)

CINeed 1Need 2Need 3Need 4Need 5Need 6Need 7

534241

HO

W 1

HO

W 2

HO

W 3

HO

W 4

HO

W 5

HO

W 6

HO

W 7

57 41 48 13 50 6 21

Page 26: Quality Function Deployment

Using the House of Quality

The voice of the customer MUST be carried THROUGHOUT the production process.

Three other “houses of quality” are used to do this and, together with the first, these carry the customer’s voice from its initial expression, through design attributes, on to component attributes, to process operations, and eventually to a quality control and improvement plans.

In Japan, all four are used.

The tendency in the West is to use only the first one or two.

Page 27: Quality Function Deployment

Cu

stom

er

Att

rib

ute

sDesign Attributes1

2

3

4

Desi

gn

Att

rib

ute

sComponent Attributes

Com

pon

en

tA

ttri

bu

tes

Process Operations

Pro

cess

Op

era

tion

s

Quality Control Plan

The How’s at One Level Become the What’s at the Next Level

The How’s at One Level Become the What’s at the Next Level

Page 28: Quality Function Deployment

Deployment Through the Levels of Product Development

Page 29: Quality Function Deployment

Weighing importance of each Customer Requirement

Page 30: Quality Function Deployment

QFD relationship and rank of attributes

Page 31: Quality Function Deployment

Advantages During the last 2 decades, in large parts of the manufacturing industry (automotive, electronics etc) the quality function deployment (QFD) technique has been applied to the development, manufacturing and servicing of products. Quantum leap improvements of more than a factor of 2 have been achieved with respect to:• reduction of development times• “painless” transition from development to production (in terms of necessary changesto make the product fit for production)• time for production ramp up• service and user friendliness (measured for instance by the number of customer complaints and emergency actions like call back of cars from the consumers)

Page 32: Quality Function Deployment

Kano Customer Need Model

Dissatisfiers Those needs that are EXPECTED in a product or service. These are generally not stated by customers but are assumed as given. If they are not present, the customer is dissatisfied.

Satisfiers Needs that customers SAY THEY WANT. Fulfilling these needs creates satisfaction.

Exciters /Delighters

New or Innovative features that customers do not expect. The presence of such unexpected features leads to high perceptions of quality.

Page 33: Quality Function Deployment

Kano Model

Page 34: Quality Function Deployment

GARVIN’S EIGHT DIMENSIONS OF PRODUCT QUALITY

Performance FeaturesConformanceAesthetics

ReliabilityDurabilityServiceabilityPerceived

Quality

Page 35: Quality Function Deployment

THANK YOU