Top Banner
Quality and Performance
68
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: quality and performance

Quality and Performance

Page 2: quality and performance

• What does the term quality mean?

• Quality is the ability of a product or service to consistently meet or exceed customer expectations.

Quality Management

Page 3: quality and performance

Key Contributors to Quality Management

Contributor

Deming Juran Feignbaum Crosby Ishikawa Taguchi Ohno and Shingo

Known for

14 points; special & common causes of variation Quality is fitness for use; quality trilogy Quality is a total field Quality is free; zero defects Cause-and effect diagrams; quality circles Taguchi loss function Continuous improvenment

Quality

Page 4: quality and performance

Determinants of Quality

Service

Ease ofuse

Conforms to design

Design

Page 5: quality and performance

Costs of Quality

Failure Costs - costs incurred by defective parts / products or faulty servicesExamples: Returns, Lost of Sales (Unhappy customers), rejects / scrapAppraisal Costs

Costs of activities designed to ensure quality or uncover defectsExamples: Sample or 100% inspection, internal audits

Prevention CostsAll TQ training, TQ planning, customer assessment, process control and quality improvement costs to prevent defects from occurring

Page 6: quality and performance

Quality Awards

Baldrige Award

Deming Prize

Page 7: quality and performance

Quality Certifications – ISO International Organisation for Standardization

• ISO 9000–Set of international standards on

quality management, critical to international business

• ISO 14000–A set of international standards

for assessing a company’s environmental performance

Page 8: quality and performance

9-8

• ISO 14000 - A set of international standards for assessing a company’s environmental performance

• Standards in three major areas– Management systems– Operations– Environmental systems

ISO 14000

Page 9: quality and performance

9-9

• Management systems– Systems development and integration

of environmental responsibilities into business planning

• Operations– Consumption of natural resources and

energy• Environmental systems

– Measuring, assessing and managing emissions, effluents, and other waste

ISO 14000

Page 10: quality and performance

Quality Certifications – ISO

• ISO 24700Specifies product characteristics for use in OEM or authorized party’s declaration of conformity to demonstrate that a marketed product containing reused components performs equivalent to new, meets requirements to new specifications and performance criteria, and continues to meet all the safety and environmental criteria required by responsibility built products

Page 11: quality and performance

Total Quality Management

A philosophy that involves everyone in an organization in a continual effort to improve quality and achieve customer satisfaction.

T Q M

Page 12: quality and performance

Organisational PracticesLeadership, Mission statement, effective operating procedures

Yields: what is to be important and what is to be accomplished

Quality Principles Customer focus, Continuous improvement, Benchmarking, Just

in Time, Tools of equipmentYields: How to do what is important and what is to be

accomplished Employee Fullfilment

Empowerment, Organisational CommitmentYields: Employee attitude that can accomplish what is

important

Customer Satisfaction

Winning orders, Repeat customersYields: An effective organisation with a competitive edge

Page 13: quality and performance

Continuous Improvement

• Philosophy that seeks to make never-ending improvements to the process of converting inputs into outputs.

• Kaizen: Japanese word for continuous improvement.

• Involves all operations and work operations including suppliers and customers

• People, Equipment, Materials, Procedures

Page 14: quality and performance

Shewhart’s PDCA Cycle

1

1. Plan: Identify the pattern and make a plan

2. Do the test plan

3. Check : Is the plan working

4. Act : Implement the plan document

Page 15: quality and performance

9-15

Six Sigma• Statistically

– Having no more than 3.4 defects per million

– Statistical definition of a process that is 99.9997% capable, 3.4 defects per million opportunities

• Conceptually– Program designed to reduce defects– Requires the use of certain tools and

techniquesSix sigma: A business process for improvingquality, reducing costs, and increasingcustomer satisfaction.

Page 16: quality and performance

Six Sigma Improvement Model

Control the new process to make sure new performance is maintained

Improve the process

Analyze the data

Measure the work and collect process data

Define the critical outputs and identify gaps for improvement

Page 17: quality and performance

Statistical Process Control (SPC)

Use statistics and control charts to for monitoring production process to prevent poor quality

Drives process improvement

4 key steps: Measure the process When a change is indicated find the

assignable cause Eliminate / incorporate the cause Resart the revised process

Page 18: quality and performance

2 Important performance variables

Performance measurement – variablesPerformance measurement – attributes

Page 19: quality and performance

Quality Measures:Attributes and Variables

• Attribute– A characteristic which is evaluated with a

discrete response– good/bad; yes/no; correct/incorrect

• Variable measure– A characteristic that is continuous and

can be measured– Weight, length, voltage, volume

Page 20: quality and performance

Nominal

UCL

LCL

Var

iati

on

s

Sample number

Exceeds control limits – Take action

Statistical Process Control Chart

Page 21: quality and performance

SPC Methods• Control charts for variables

– R-Chart

UCLR = D4R and LCLR = D3R

where

R = average of several past R values and the central line of the control chart

D3, D4 = constants that provide three standard deviation (three-sigma) limits for the given sample size

Page 22: quality and performance

Control Chart FactorsTABLE 5.1 | FACTORS FOR CALCULATING SIGMA LIMITS FOR

| THE x-CHART AND R-CHART

Size of Sample (n)

Factor for UCL and LCL for x-Chart (A2)

Factor for LCL for R-Chart (D3)

Factor for UCL for R-Chart (D4)

2 1.880 0 3.267

3 1.023 0 2.575

4 0.729 0 2.282

5 0.577 0 2.115

6 0.483 0 2.004

7 0.419 0.076 1.924

8 0.373 0.136 1.864

9 0.337 0.184 1.816

10 0.308 0.223 1.777

Page 23: quality and performance

SPC Methods

UCLx = x + A2R and LCLx = x – A2R

Control charts for variables x-Chart

where

x = central line of the chart, which can be either the average of past sample means or a target value set for the process

A2 = constant to provide three-sigma limits for the sample mean

Page 24: quality and performance

Steps for x- and R-Charts

1. Collect data

2. Compute the range

3. Use Table 5.1 to determine R-chart control limits

4. Plot the sample ranges. If all are in control, proceed to step 5. Otherwise, find the assignable causes, correct them, and return to step 1.

5. Calculate x for each sample

Page 25: quality and performance

6. Use Table 5.1 to determine x-chart control limits

7. Plot the sample means. If all are in control, the process is in statistical control.

8. Continue to take samples and monitor the process. If any are out of control, find the assignable causes, correct them, and return to step 1

Steps for x- and R-Charts

Page 26: quality and performance

EXAMPLE .1The management of West Allis Industries is concerned about the production of a special metal screw used by several of the company’s largest customers. The diameter of the screw is critical to the customers. Data from five samples appear in the accompanying table. The sample size is 4. Is the process in statistical control?

SOLUTION

Step 1: For simplicity, we use only 5 samples. In practice, more than 20 samples would be desirable. The data are shown in the following table.

Using x- and R-Charts

Page 27: quality and performance

Data for the x- and R-Charts: Observation of Screw Diameter (in.)

Observation

Sample Number 1 2 3 4 R x

1 0.5014 0.5022 0.5009 0.5027

2 0.5021 0.5041 0.5024 0.5020

3 0.5018 0.5026 0.5035 0.5023

4 0.5008 0.5034 0.5024 0.5015

5 0.5041 0.5056 0.5034 0.5047

Page 28: quality and performance

Step 2: Compute the range for each sample by subtracting the lowest value from the highest value. For example, in sample 1 the range is 0.5027 – 0.5009 = 0.0018 in. Similarly, the ranges for samples 2, 3, 4, and 5 are 0.0021, 0.0017, 0.0026, and 0.0022 in., respectively. As shown in the table, R = 0.0021.

Data for the x- and R-Charts: Observation of Screw Diameter (in.)

Observation

Sample Number 1 2 3 4 R x

1 0.5014 0.5022 0.5009 0.5027 0.0018 0.5018

2 0.5021 0.5041 0.5024 0.5020 0.0021 0.5027

3 0.5018 0.5026 0.5035 0.5023 0.0017 0.5026

4 0.5008 0.5034 0.5024 0.5015 0.0026 0.5020

5 0.5041 0.5056 0.5034 0.5047 0.0022 0.5045

Average 0.0021 0.5027

Page 29: quality and performance

Step 3: To construct the R-chart, select the appropriate constants from Table 5.1 for a sample size of 4. The control limits are

UCLR = D4R = 2.282(0.0021) = 0.00479 in.

0(0.0021) = 0 in.

Step 4: Plot the ranges on the R-chart, as shown in Figure 5.10. None of the sample ranges falls outside the control limits so the process variability is in statistical control. If any of the sample ranges fall outside of the limits, or an unusual pattern appears, we would search for the causes of the excessive variability, correct them, and repeat step 1.

LCLR = D3R =

Page 30: quality and performance

Figure 5.10 – Range Chart of x and R-Chart for the Metal Screw, Showing That the Process Variability Is in Control

Page 31: quality and performance

Step 5: Compute the mean for each sample. For example, the mean for sample 1 is

0.5014 + 0.5022 + 0.5009 + 0.50274

= 0.5018 in.

Similarly, the means of samples 2, 3, 4, and 5 are 0.5027, 0.5026, 0.5020, and 0.5045 in., respectively. As shown in the table, x = 0.5027.

Page 32: quality and performance

Step 7: Plot the sample means on the control chart, as shown in Figure 5.11.

The mean of sample 5 falls above the UCL, indicating that the process average is out of statistical control and that assignable causes must be explored, perhaps using a cause-and-effect diagram.

LCLx = x – A2R =

0.5027 + 0.729(0.0021) = 0.5042 in.

0.5027 – 0.729(0.0021) = 0.5012 in.

UCLx = x + A2R =

Step 6: Now construct the x-chart for the process average. The average screw diameter is 0.5027 in., and the average range is 0.0021 in., so use x = 0.5027, R = 0.0021, and A2 from Table 5.1 for a sample size of 4 to construct the control limits:

Page 33: quality and performance
Page 34: quality and performance

An Alternate Form

UCLx = x + zσx and LCLx = x – zσx

If the standard deviation of the process distribution is known, another form of the x-chart may be used:

where

σx = σ/ nσ = standard deviation of the process distributionn = sample sizex = central line of the chartz = normal deviate number

Page 35: quality and performance

Using Process Standard DeviationEXAMPLE 2

For Sunny Dale Bank the time required to serve customers at the drive-by window is an important quality factor in competing with other banks in the city. Mean time to process a customer at the peak

demand period is 5 minutes Standard deviation of 1.5 minutes Sample size of six customers Design an x-chart that z-value of 1.96

After several weeks of sampling, two successive samples came in at 3.70 and 3.68 minutes, respectively. Is the customer service process in statistical control?

Page 36: quality and performance

Using Process Standard Deviation

x = 5 minutes

σ = 1.5 minutes

n = 6 customers

z = 1.96

UCLx = x + zσ/n =

LCLx = x – zσ/n =

5.0 + 1.96(1.5)/6 = 6.20 minutes

5.0 – 1.96(1.5)/6 = 3.80 minutes

The process variability is in statistical control, so we proceed directly to the x-chart. The control limits are

Page 37: quality and performance

Application Problem 1

Webster Chemical Company produces a specified product for the construction industry. The product is blended in large mixers and then pumped into tubes and capped.Webster is concerned whether the filling process for tubes of product is in statistical control. The process should be centered on 8 ounces per tube. Several samples of eight tubes are taken and each tube is weighed in ounces.

Tube Number

Sample 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 7.98 8.34 8.02 7.94 8.44 7.68 7.81 8.11

2 8.23 8.12 7.98 8.41 8.31 8.18 7.99 8.06

3 7.89 7.77 7.91 8.04 8.00 7.89 7.93 8.09

4 8.24 8.18 7.83 8.05 7.90 8.16 7.97 8.07

5 7.87 8.13 7.92 7.99 8.10 7.81 8.14 7.88

6 8.13 8.14 8.11 8.13 8.14 8.12 8.13 8.14

Page 38: quality and performance

Assuming that taking only 6 samples is sufficient, is the process in statistical control?

UCLR = D4R =

LCLR = D3R =

1.864(0.38) = 0.708

0.136(0.38) = 0.052

The range chart is out of control since sample 1 falls outside the UCL and sample 6 falls outside the LCL.

Conclusion on process variability given R = 0.38 and n = 8:

Application Problem 1

Page 39: quality and performance

What is the conclusion on process variability and process average?

Application Problem 1.1

Tube Number

Sample 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 7.98 8.34 8.02 7.94 8.44 7.68 7.81 8.11

2 8.23 8.12 7.98 8.41 8.31 8.18 7.99 8.06

3 7.89 7.77 7.91 8.04 8.00 7.89 7.93 8.09

4 8.24 8.18 7.83 8.05 7.90 8.16 7.97 8.07

5 7.87 8.13 7.92 7.99 8.10 7.81 8.14 7.88

Page 40: quality and performance

UCLR = D4R =

LCLR = D3R =

1.864(0.45) = 0.839

0.136(0.45) = 0.061

UCLx = x + A2R =

LCLx = x – A2R =

8.034 + 0.373(0.45) = 8.202

8.034 – 0.373(0.45) = 7.832

Now R = 0.45, x = 8.034, and n = 8

The resulting control charts indicate that the process is actually in control.

Application Problem 1.1

Page 41: quality and performance

Control Charts for Attributes

• p-charts are used to control the proportion defective

• Sampling involves yes/no decisions so the underlying distribution is the binomial distribution

• The standard deviation is nppp / 1

p = the center line on the chart

UCLp = p + zσp and LCLp = p – zσp

and

Page 42: quality and performance

Using p-Charts

• Periodically a random sample of size n is taken• The number of defectives is counted• The proportion defective p is calculated• If the proportion defective falls outside the UCL,

it is assumed the process has changed and assignable causes are identified and eliminated

• If the proportion defective falls outside the LCL, the process may have improved and assignable causes are identified and incorporated

Page 43: quality and performance

EXAMPLE 3 Hometown Bank is concerned about the number of

wrong customer account numbers recorded Each week a random sample of 2,500 deposits is

taken and the number of incorrect account numbers is recorded

The results for the past 12 weeks are shown in the following table

Is the booking process out of statistical control? Use three-sigma control limits

Page 44: quality and performance

Using a p-Chart

Sample Number Wrong Account Numbers Sample Number Wrong Account

Numbers

1 15 7 24

2 12 8 7

3 19 9 10

4 2 10 17

5 19 11 15

6 4 12 3

Total 147

Page 45: quality and performance

Using a p-Chart

147

12(2,500)= = 0.0049p =

Total defectives

Total number of observations

σp = p(1 – p)/n = 0.0049(1 – 0.0049)/2,500 = 0.0014

UCLp = p + zσp

LCLp = p – zσp

= 0.0049 + 3(0.0014) = 0.0091

= 0.0049 – 3(0.0014) = 0.0007

Step 1: Using this sample data to calculate p

Page 46: quality and performance

Using a p-Chart

Step 2: Calculate the sample proportion defective. For sample 1, the proportion of defectives is 15/2,500 = 0.0060.

Step 3: Plot each sample proportion defective on the chart, as shown

Fraction Defective

Sample

Mean

UCL

LCL

.0091

.0049

.0007 | | | | | | | | | | | |

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

XX

X

X

X

X

XX

X

X

X

X

Page 47: quality and performance

Application Problem 2A sticky scale brings Webster’s attention to whether caulking tubes are being properly capped. If a significant proportion of the tubes aren’t being sealed, Webster is placing their customers in a messy situation. Tubes are packaged in large boxes of 144. Several boxes are inspected and the following numbers of leaking tubes are found:

Sample Tubes Sample Tubes Sample Tubes

1 3 8 6 15 5

2 5 9 4 16 0

3 3 10 9 17 2

4 4 11 2 18 6

5 2 12 6 19 2

6 4 13 5 20 1

7 2 14 1 Total = 72

Page 48: quality and performance

Calculate the p-chart three-sigma control limits to assess whether the capping process is in statistical control.

tubesofnumberTotal

tubesleakyofnumberTotalp

0.025

1442072

0.01301

1440.02510.025

pp zpUCL

pp zpLCL 0 0.014030.0130130.025

0.064030.0130130.025

npp

p

1

The process is in control as the p values for the samples all fall within the control limits.

Application Problem 2

Page 49: quality and performance

Control Charts for Attributes• c-charts count the number of defects per unit of

service encounter

The mean of the distribution is c and the standard deviation is c

UCLc = c + zc and LCLc = c – zc

Page 50: quality and performance

Using a c-ChartEXAMPLE 4The Woodland Paper Company produces paper for the newspaper industry. As a final step in the process, the paper passes through a machine that measures various product quality characteristics. When the paper production process is in control, it averages 20 defects per roll.

a. Set up a control chart for the number of defects per roll. For this example, use two-sigma control limits.

b. Five rolls had the following number of defects: 16, 21, 17, 22, and 24, respectively. The sixth roll, using pulp from a different supplier, had 5 defects. Is the paper production process in control?

Page 51: quality and performance

Using a c-Chart

SOLUTION

a. The average number of defects per roll is 20. Therefore

UCLc = c + zc

LCLc = c – zc

= 20 + 2(20) = 28.94

= 20 – 2(20) = 11.06

The control chart is shown in Figure 5.13

Page 52: quality and performance

Using a c-Chart

b. Because the first five rolls had defects that fell within the control limits, the process is still in control. Five defects (sample 6), however, is less than the LCL, and therefore, the process is technically “out of control.” The control chart indicates that something good has happened.

Page 53: quality and performance

At Webster Chemical, lumps in the caulking compound could cause difficulties in dispensing a smooth bead from the tube. Even when the process is in control, there will still be an average of 4 lumps per tube of caulk. Testing for the presence of lumps destroys the product, so Webster takes random samples. The following are results of the study:

Tube # Lumps Tube # Lumps Tube # Lumps

1 6 5 6 9 5

2 5 6 4 10 0

3 0 7 1 11 9

4 4 8 6 12 2

Determine the c-chart two-sigma upper and lower control limits for this process.

Application Problem 3

Page 54: quality and performance

Application 3

c

c

cc zcUCL

cc zcLCL

412

290561464056

24

8224

0224

Page 55: quality and performance

• Tolerances or specifications– Range of acceptable values

established by engineering design or customer requirements

Process Capability

Page 56: quality and performance

Process Capability

(b) Design specifications and natural variation the same; process is capable of meeting specifications most of the time.

Design Specifications

Process

(a) Natural variation exceeds design specifications; process is not capable of meeting specifications all the time.

Design Specifications

Process

Page 57: quality and performance

Process Capability

(c) Design specifications greater than natural variation; process is capable of always conforming to specifications.

Design Specifications

Process

Page 58: quality and performance

Process Capability Ratio

Process capability ratio for centered process, Cp =

specification widthprocess width

Upper specification – lower specification6

Cp =

3

X-UTLor

3

LTLXmin=C pk

If the process is centered use Cp

If the process is not centered use Cpk

Page 59: quality and performance

Processmean

Lowerspecification

Upperspecification

1350 ppm 1350 ppm

1.7 ppm 1.7 ppm

+/- 3 Sigma

+/- 6 Sigma

3 Sigma and 6 Sigma Quality

Page 60: quality and performance

Additional Problem - 1

Determine if these 2 processes are capableProcess Mean Standard Deviation

Lower Spec

Upper Spec

1 7.5 .10 7.0 8.0

2 4.6 .12 4.3 4.9

3 6.0 .14 5.5 6.7

Determine if these 2 processes are capable

Page 61: quality and performance

In order to be capable Cp must be atleast 1.33process 1: Cp = 8-7 / 6 (.10) = 1.67 similarly process 2: Cp = 4.9 – 4.3 / 6 (.12) = .83

For process 3, Cpk must be atleast 1.33, it is the lesser of these 2

upper spec – mean / 3 standard deviation = 6.7 – 6 / 3(.14) = 1.67

mean – lower spec / 3 standard deviation = 6.0 – 5.5 / 3(.14) = 1.19

Page 62: quality and performance

Additional Problem - 2

An industrial process that makes plastic pipe Produces pipe with an average inside diameter of 1 inch and a SD of .05 inch

A. If you randomly select one piece of pipe, what is the Probab. That the inside diameter will exceed 1.02 inches, assuming the Population is normal

B. If you select a random sample of 25 pieces of pipe, what is the probability that sample mean will exceed 1.02 inches

Page 63: quality and performance

Additional Problem - 3Processing new accounts at a bank is intended to average 10 minutes each. Five samples of 4 observations each have been Taken. Use the sample data to construct upper and lower Limits for both a mean chart and range chart. Do results suggest That the process is in control

Sample 1

Sample 2

Sample 3

Sample 4

Sample 5

10.2 10.3 9.7 9.9 989.9 9.8 9.9 10.3 10.29.8 9.9 9.9 10.1 10.310.1 10.4 10.1 10.5 9.7

Page 64: quality and performance

Additional Problem - 4Using the appropriate control chart, determine 3 sigma limits for Each Case

A. An inspector found an average of 3.9 minor scratches in the Exterior Paint of each of the automobiles being prepared for shipment to dealers

B. Before shipping lawn movers to dealers, an inspector attempts to start each mower and notes any that do not start on the first try.The lot size is 100 mowers and an average of 4 did not start.

Page 65: quality and performance

Problem12 tasks with various requirements are shown below: Arrange them to workstations using a cycle time of 1.5 minutesTask a b c d e f g h i J K l

Length (min)

.1 .2 .9 .6 .1 .2 .4 .1 .2 .7 .3 .2

Follows tasks

- a b c - d,e f g h i j k

I. Draw the precedence diagram for this lineII. Assume tasks to stationsIII.Compute the percentage of idle time

Page 66: quality and performance

Construction of p-Chart

20 samples of 100 pairs of jeans

NUMBER OF PROPORTIONSAMPLE # DEFECTIVES DEFECTIVE

1 6 .06

2 0 .00

3 4 .04

: : :

: : :

20 18 .18

200

Page 67: quality and performance

UCL = p + z = 0.10 + 3p(1 - p)

n

0.10(1 - 0.10)

100

UCL = 0.190

LCL = 0.010

LCL = p - z = 0.10 - 3p(1 - p)

n

0.10(1 - 0.10)

100

= 200 / 20(100) = 0.10total defectives

total sample observationsp =

Construction of p-Chart

Page 68: quality and performance

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14

0.16

0.18

0.20

Pro

por

tion

defe

ctiv

e

Sample number2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

UCL = 0.190

LCL = 0.010

p = 0.10

Construction of p-Chart