Top Banner
1/90 PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT JU Grant Agreement number: 295364 Project acronym: DESERVE Project title: DEvelopment platform for Safe and Efficient dRiVE Date of latest version of Annex I against which the assessment will be made: Periodic report: 1 st 2 nd 3 rd 4 th Period covered: from Sep 1, 2013 to Aug 31, 2014 Name, title and organisation of the scientific representative of the project's coordinator: Matti Kutila, Senior Project Manager, VTT Tel: +358 40 820 8334 E-mail: [email protected] Project website address: http://www.deserve-project.eu/
90

PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

Jul 15, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

1/90

PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT

JU Grant Agreement number: 295364Project acronym: DESERVEProject title: DEvelopment platform for Safe and Efficient dRiVEDate of latest version of Annex I against which the assessment will be made:

Periodic report: 1st 2nd 3rd 4th

Period covered: from Sep 1, 2013 to Aug 31, 2014Name, title and organisation of the scientific representative of the project's coordinator:Matti Kutila, Senior Project Manager, VTTTel: +358 40 820 8334E-mail: [email protected]

Project website address: http://www.deserve-project.eu/

Page 2: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 2/90

2

Declaration by the scientific representative of the projectcoordinator

I, as scientific representative of the coordinator of this project and in line with the obligationsas stated in Article II.2.3 of the JU Grant Agreement declare that:

The attached periodic report represents an accurate description of the work carried out inthis project for this reporting period;

The project (tick as appropriate):

has fully achieved its objectives and technical goals for the period;

has achieved most of its objectives and technical goals for the period withrelatively minor deviations1;

has failed to achieve critical objectives and/or is not at all on schedule2.

The public website is up to date, if applicable.

All beneficiaries, in particular non-profit public bodies, secondary and higher educationestablishments, research organisations and SMEs, have declared to have verified theirlegal status. Any changes have been reported under section 5 (Project Management) inaccordance with Article III.2.f and IV.1.f of the JU Grant Agreement.

Name of scientific representative of the Coordinator:

Matti Kutila, Senior Specialist, Planning....................................................................

Date: 24th of September 2014

1 If either of these boxes is ticked, the report should reflect these and any remedial actions taken.2 If either of these boxes is ticked, the report should reflect these and any remedial actions taken.

Page 3: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 3/90

3

Contents

DECLARATION BY THE SCIENTIFIC REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PROJECTCOORDINATOR 2

1. PUBLISHABLE SUMMARY 4

2. PROJECT OBJECTIVES FOR THE PERIOD 5

3. WORK PROGRESS AND ACHIEVEMENTS DURING THE PERIOD 8

3.1 Work package summaries 9

3.2 Partners progress reports 34

3.3 Deliverables and milestones tables 62

3.4 Project management 68

3.5 Explanation of the use of the resources 70

4. BENEFICIARIES WITHOUT A CORRESPONDING NATIONAL GRANTAGREEMENT 90

Certificates 90

Page 4: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 4/90

4

1. Publishable summary

DESERVE will build an innovation ecosystem for European leadership in ADAS embedded systems,based on the automotive R&D actors, with possible applications in other industrial domains.Complexity and number of different ADAS functions is steadily increasing which set specialchallenges for development and testing the new functions. At the same time, the industry domainslike automotive are encountering high costs reduction requirements. In order to meet these businesschallenges an ARTEMIS Tool Platform based on the standardisation of the interfaces, software(SW) reuse, development of common non-competitive SW modules, and easy and safety-compliantintegration of standardised hardware (HW) or SW from different suppliers will be developed.

Since the purpose of ADAS functions is also to support the driver, an advanced human-centreddesign strategy will be integrated in the Tool Platform. Therefore, the developed applications willprovide natural and friendly support to the driver, with proper levels of overall functional safetyalso during complex or emergency manoeuvres.

During the second project year, specifications of the project has been finalised and implementationof the prototypes have started. The three DESERVE prototypes will be integrated to the 5demonstration vehicles including both heavy good vehicles and passenger car. The followingapplications are implemented during the project:

Lane change assistance systemPedestrian safety systemsForward/Rearward looking system (distant range)Adaptive light controlPark assistantNight vision systemCruise Control SystemTraffic sign and traffic light recognitionMap supported systems (Note: only DAS scope, no driver information)Vehicle interior observation

After 2 years of planning and implementation, the two base software platforms have been selected(RTMaps and ADTF) which creates the standardised “operating system” for adding the DESERVEfunctions. One example of the results is the HMI strategy to adapt different output devices (displays,acoustic and haptic) for supporting driver’s night vision capability and adapting lighting accordingto driving situation. Moreover, cooperative and in-vehicle functions have been developed to supportprotection of pedestrians and intersection safety with the communication sub-systems betweentraffic infrastructure and vehicles.

The project is coordinated by Dr. Matti Kutila from VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland. Hisphone number is +358 40 820 8334 and email address [email protected]. Further informationconcerning the project is available in the project web site: http://www.deserve-project.eu/

Page 5: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 5/90

5

Figure 1. Deserve logo

Figure 2. Driver monitoring in the simulated commercial vehicle cockpit

2. Project objectives for the period

The overall objective of the DESERVE project is to build an innovative platform for compositionaldevelopment of ADAS systems, contributing to safe and highly efficient driving and designed to beeconomically viable in the low volume vehicle market. The main aim of the second reporting periodwas to develop the first DESERVE pilots starting from the requirements and specifications definedduring the first year. The project includes three different types of demonstration vehicles:

Passenger cars (no. 3)Heavy commercial vehicle (no. 1)Motorcycle

The project objectives stated in Annex I – Part B are:

Scientific and Technicalobjectives

Measurable and verifiableform

Objectives in 2nd reportingperiod

The definition and implementation ofa model-driven process for thecompositional development of safetycritical systems that allows thesmoothly integration of existingcomponents and functions in a newframework

By defining an analysis methodology toestablish an industrially applicableprocess for exploration of designspaces and multi-criteria constraintsatisfaction, with particular regard tosafety properties.

Verification: 90% or more of theapplications identified could bedeveloped with the proposed platform

Finalise the intermediate processmodelling under SP2 and generatethe first versions of the DESERVEprototypes which can be used toverify the process.

Verifications: D21.2 (Developmentsystem (Final Release): Final Releaseof development system) and D21.4Development method (Final Release):Final Release of Development methodare under development.

Page 6: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 6/90

6

The development of an innovativeembedded vehicle platform capableof supporting the fast and reliabledevelopment of ADAS and efficientEco-driving functions

By implementing demonstrators foractive and passive safety of drivers andall road users in the three macro-areasin the automotive domain such as:- Technical, safety and efficiencyimpact assessment of resultingprototypes following the evaluationmethodologies identified in projectPREVAL and in line with INTERACTIVEevaluation methodologies;- Cost-Benefits analysis- Evaluation of cost reduction incomparison with conventional DriverAssistance Systems.

Verification: 90% or more of thedeveloped applications showed morethan 15% of reduction indevelopment time and cost.

Complete designing and specifyingthe functions. Start implementationand planning exploitation.

Verification: D131 DevelopmentPlatform Specification: Definition ofthe specification of the DESERVEPlatform has been completed.Some prototypes delivered VRUprotection function (D43.2) andAutomated functions (D44.2) hasbeen submitted. Exploitation plan isbending.

The integration of existing vehiclesensors and actuators in a unified SWframework for multiple safety andEco-driving applications

Existence of a cost-effective andflexible SW platform, able to be usedwith available sensors/actuators.

Verification: 90% or more of thedeveloped applications show morethan 15% reduction in developmentduration and cost.

Initiate integration.

Verification: Passenger car,Commercial vehicle and Motorcycledemonstration are underdevelopment.

The adaptation of the current datafusion, HMI and driver’s behaviourmodules to provide suitable andharmonised middleware for thedifferent safety and Eco-drivingfunctions

By applying the V-model anddeveloping high level services andApplication Protocol Interface (API)that can be used in a wide range ofsafety-related use cases (alsoconsidering the possible emerging risk-prone use cases for the nextgeneration vehicles)

Via multi-modal HMI with user relatedand driver behaviour assessmentthrough tests in driving simulator andin prototype vehiclesBy using EU project PELOPS simulationin the driver behaviour modules andproviding benchmarking betweenPELOPS virtual driver and real driver.

Verification: Statistical evidence ofimprovement of driver acceptancebetween existing (on the market) andDESERVE-developed functions.Subjective evaluation throughquestionnaires.

Finalise the HMI design and drivermodelling.

Verification: D34.1 (HMI solutiondesign) and D61.1 (ResearchHypothesis andperformance indicators) has beensubmitted to describe user relatedassessment of the DESERVE functions

Page 7: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 7/90

7

The implementation of a newmethod and relative tools for ADASfunctions development

Existence of new tools fordevelopment of Driver AssistanceSystems, including data fusionvisualisation, algorithm development,actuation simulation, etc.

Verification:Evidence that the method is suitablefor effective ADAS developments:- Results of the test case development- Results of workshops with mainstakeholders, OEMs and Automotivesuppliers.

Implementation started and the 1st

prototypes have been developed.

Verification: About 40 % of the stand-alone demonstrations are availableand integration to the pilot vehicles isbending.

Page 8: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 8/90

8

3. Work progress and achievements during the periodFigure 3 shows the timeline of the DESERVE sub-projects. SP1 was closed after the first projectyear but all the other sub-projects are still running. One 1st year deliverable is still under preparationbut the others has been finalised. Most of the second year deliverables will be submitted on August.

The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. Theoverall estimate is that the project 4 month behind of the planned schedule and partially the reasonis slow start due to change of the coordinator in begin of the project.

Figure 3. The project 2nd year status

Page 9: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 9/90

9

3.1 Work package summaries

SP2 ADAS Development Platform (INRIA)2nd year objectives: A description of the development platform for ADAS in the

framework of DESERVE project is presented. It is divided in 6different and complementary lines of work. Most of the functionsdescribed in the Tools and development systems (WP21),perception layer (WP22) and the platform system (WP25)architecture shows the modularity and scalability of our proposal.Different deliverables (final releases) are provided in each WP.Mainly, 3 demonstrators are considered in SP2 Daimler, CRF andVolvo.

Summary of progress: Constant interaction between all partners. Some of them worktogether (Daimler, CRF and Volvo demonstrator).Based on vehicle modelling (WP23), driver behaviour and intention,a first approach for the arbitration and control (WP24) strategies,which can anticipate the priorities on the control in emergencysituations, is described. Moreover, some simulations will allow thevirtual testing (WP26) based on real data.SP2 is the core of DESERVE project, and it is developed in parallelwith Driver behaviour and HMI activities (SP3). The results will betested, integrated and validated in 4 vehicle demonstrators in thenext stages of the project.Based on the components layout template, proposed by CRF, theresponsibilities of the partner in the CRF demonstrator weredefined.Two main tools (ADTF and RTMaps) have been selected to test therobustness and modularity of our approaches (Daimler andCRF/Volvo, respectively).A paper was presented in the SAMOS Workshop: “Developmentand design of a platform for arbitration and sharing controlapplications”, where some of the achievements in SP2 have beenpointed out, mainly the application platform integration in one ofthe demonstrators, along with the arbitration and sharing control,based on intelligent techniques.

Major results: Detailed development architectures were defined, and currentlythe partners are working on their assigned tasks, for all the usecases and platforms.Definition and development of the inputs and outputs of eachmodule developed in the Perception, Application and IWIplatforms.

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

No technical or scientific deviations.Most of the final deliverables are being completed.

Statement of used resources: The expected human resources were almost respected. However, itis important to underline that the French partners have somemodifications in their person-months efforts in the projectincluding SP2.

Statement concerning interaction Some SP2 partners had important interaction with HOLIDES-EU-

Page 10: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 10/90

10

with other projects: ARTEMIS project, interactIVe-EU-FP7 project as well as the formerEU-FP7-Have-IT project and CityMobil2 and the French ABV (LowSpeed Automation) project.

Dissemination and exploitation: There have been some dissemination efforts within SP2:- Samos conference: Development and design of a platform forarbitration and sharing control applications a DESERVE approach,July 2014.- IEEE-IV 2014: Arbitration for Balancing Control between theDriver and ADAS Systems in an Automated Vehicle: Survey andApproach, June 2014.- Book Chapter: Vehicle control in ADAS applications -State of theart-, intelligent transportation systems: technologies andapplications intelligent (Wiley publications).

WP21 Tools and Development Systems (dSpace)2st year objectives: The objective is the integration of tools and development systems

to realize the overall development platform as a prototype.Summary of progress: The tools analysed in the first part of the project have been

adapted to and integrated into the development system.An interface for the ADTF tool from Elektrobit to be used with theDESERVE prototyping platform has been developed. Furthermore,RTMaps has been coupled to the DESERVE rapid prototypingplatform by implementing a certain blockset.The software and the hardware of the universal developmentplatform have been provided to the partners.Further research of the State-of-the-Art in hardware cost modellingand multi-criteria analysis (i.e., design space exploration) has beensucceeded.

Major results: Adaptation of tools,Implementation of tool interfaces,Availability of a first development platform prototype includingthe necessary hardware and software components.

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

Up to now the project partners didn´t report any significantdeviations. The deliverables are on time.

Statement of used resources: So far the project partners didn´t report delays for this workpackage.

Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:

There was no interaction with other project on work package level.

Dissemination and exploitation: There were no actions concerning dissemination and exploitation.WP22 Perception Layer (Bosch)

2ndt year objectives: Second year objectives of “WP 22 – Perception Layer” are therefinements of the DESERVE platform parts that interface with thetypical information sources and outputs, i.e. the sensors, digitalmaps, actuators, cooperative communication, sensor fusion,processing and modelling of sensor interfaces for System on Chip(SoC) implementations. The virtual abstraction layer descriptortables are improved to provide the required information to all theDESERVE platform modules, independent of the real physicalimplementation of the respective sensing devices. This kind ofstandardized information flow is already used in computer systemssince many years with key words like hardware abstraction layer(HAL), application programming interface (API), Portable Operating

Page 11: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 11/90

11

System Interface (POSIX), etc.Summary of progress: In the second year the DESERVE perception layer was analysed and

described in an abstracted and hierarchical form in more detail forall the seven perception sub-layers sensors(1), digital maps(2),actuators(3), cooperative communication(4), sensor fusion(5),processing(6) and modelling of sensor interfaces for System onChip (SoC) implementations(7).Existing preliminary work from the ADASIS standard for digitalmaps and the concepts developed by the FP7 research projectsINTERACTIVE and HAVE-IT was reuse or adapted. Working resultsare documented in the Deliverables D2.2.2 and D2.2.3.

Major results: Deliverable D2.2.2 – DESERVE Perception layer – IntermediateReleaseDeliverable D2.2.3 – DESERVE Perception layer – Final Release

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

There is no significant deviation from the work planned in Annex 1-DoW. No corrective actions are currently planned or implemented.The initial planned approach in the DoW to go for seven perceptionsub-layers was maintained despite the opinion and feeling of someproject partners that least actuators, processing and modelling ofsensor interfaces for System on Chip (SoC) implementations are notreally within the scope of perception.

Statement of used resources: The resources were used by the partners as planned with onlyslight under- or overspending in some cases.

Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:

The interaction with other research project was mainlyconcentrated in balancing and adjusting the already existingdefinitions and specifications, especially with the ADASIS Forumand with the FP7 research programme INTERACTIVE.

Dissemination and exploitation: No dissemination activities were done on this topic..WP23 Vehicle Modelling (CRF)

2nd year objectives: The objective of WP23 Vehicle modelling in the second year is tobuild up and validate the simulation model of the selectedreference vehicle.

Summary of progress: The purpose of D233 deliverable – final release (work package 2.3,task 2.3.2) is to build up and validate the simulation model of thereference vehicle selected for this task (front wheel drive L0-segment car), using the commercial tool ASM from dSPACE.The ASM simulation tool has been selected to build the genericvehicle model for the DESERVE Project, after having evaluatedsome commercially available tools based on 14 degrees offreedom vehicle models.A handling characterization has been performed experimentally inorder to collect reference data for vehicle model validation insteady-state and transient conditions. In the first phase of thevalidation process, the collected experimental data have been usedto validate a detailed Multibody model of the reference vehicle,considering that the Multibody simulation environment is theCompany standard for vehicle dynamics simulation.In the second phase the outputs of the validated Multibody modelhave been used as reference to assess the accuracy of simulationresults obtained from ASM model, coherently with the approachfollowed for the benchmark of commercially available simulation

Page 12: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 12/90

12

tools based on models with 14 degrees of freedom.The main results of D233 are:• an ASM model of the reference vehicle has been build and is nowavailable for following project tasks;• the accuracy of that model has been proved to be satisfying incomparison to a reference Multibody model, previously validatedwith respect to experimental data.

Major results: D2.3.3 - Generic Vehicle Model – Final ReleaseDeviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

D2.3.3 report has been submitted on time.

Statement of used resources: Resources have been used according to plan.Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:

No

Dissemination and exploitation: No dissemination activities.WP24 Arbitration/Control (INRIA)

2nd year objectives: Sharing control techniques and different solutions in the taskmanagement are considered.Arbitration and sharing control algorithms, based on intelligenttechniques (Fuzzy logic), have been developed as first release,using RTMaps and ProSivic Simulator.One deliverable (D24.4) is provided.Tuning of parameters will be carried out with a dedicatedexperimental phase in the next year.

Summary of progress: There is a constant collaboration between INRIA and CTAG to workin this WP. The deliverable D24.4 will be submitted to the peer-review process.The levels of automation described (SAE J3016) were defined to thearbitration outputs.Overview on Arbitration and sharing Controller (what is needed,what is missing, which are the next steps, etc.) is presented.The first log with vehicle data is defined

Major results: An approach for the arbitration and sharing control applicationmodules.A description of the SP2 framework, the different Work-Packages,tools and devices used in the CRF demonstrator and the controlarchitecture were presented (Samos paper).The main contribution of this WP is the fuzzy logic approach forarbitration and sharing control modules. These modules will betested in a real demonstrator car provided by CRF.

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

Not delay expected for D24.2

Statement of used resources: There are not modifications in the person-month assigned to INRIAin this WP. The resources are used on time.

Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:

There is interaction with WP43, WP26 and WP44.

Dissemination and exploitation: At least 4 papers (3 conferences and a book chapter) were sent.WP25 Platform System Architecture (INFINEON)

2nd year objectives: The main goal of the second year is the finalization of the PlatformSystem Architecture.

Summary of progress: Based on year 1 resultsD25.1 Platform System Architecture – First Release

Page 13: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 13/90

13

D25.3 Standard Interfaces definition – First ReleaseD25.5 Guidelines for applications development – First Release

work was continued to provide the final versionsD25.2 Platform System Architecture – Final ReleaseD25.4 Standard Interfaces definition – Final ReleaseD25.6 Guidelines for applications development – Final Release

Major results: Deliverables D25.2, D25.4 and D25.6 are available as initial versionsDeviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

Deliverables will be available as soon as possible by the schedule.

Statement of used resources: Resources have been used according to plan.Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:

n/a

Dissemination and exploitation: In the current stage of work, results of WP25 are intended for thenext development steps within DESERVE, they are not planned forexternal dissemination. The exploitation will start later in theproject, currently there are no exploitable results.

WP26 Virtual Testing (INTEMPORA)2nd year objectives: The objectives of the second year were mainly to setup virtual

testing software solutions bringing up together the varioussoftware environments for simulation, real-time data processingand command-control.

Summary of progress: The various software functions and interfaces for virtual testingsolutions have been performed and are currently under test. As anexample, CRF is currently testing the interface between TASPresCAN simulator / Simulink / RTMaps. INRIA and IRSEEM havesetup virtual testing solutions based on the interface betweenCIVITEC ProSIVIC simulator and RTMaps.

Intempora also developed the I-DEEP software for automation ofADAS functions test cases with simulated environments.

Major results: The virtual testing solutions have been setup and are currentlyunder testing.

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

There is no serious deviation here, just a slight delay.

Statement of used resources: Resources are used as planned with some offset in time.Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:

None

Dissemination and exploitation: INTEMPORA presented the I-DEEP virtual testing solution, based onthe interface between ProSIVIC and RTMaps at the SafetyAssistconference in Aschaffenburg in May 2014.

Page 14: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 14/90

14

SP3 Driver Behaviour – HMI (ICOOR)

2nd year objectives: SP3 current work is focusing on the driver behaviour (includingdriving monitoring) modules: they have been refined and it hasbeen discussed their implementation on the demo vehicle (CRF).A preliminary work on the HMI (wp3.4) is ongoing: it will beconcluded in PY3, when the HMI prototype is planned to bedelivered (D34.2). Their integration within the overall platform istaken into consideration in the current work..

Summary of progress: WP31: Refinement of layout, characteristics and requirements ofthe Driver Intention Detection Module (DIDM) of the Virtual Driver(VD). Discussion on their implementation. Draft of D31.2.WP32: Design of the modules of the driver monitoringdemonstrator to be installed in the CRF Demo car. Discussion andagreement on the integration of driver monitoring functions intoCRF demo vehicleConference calls have been organized with wp leaders. Moreoverperiodic calls have been organized in wp3.1. Progresses in SP3 havebeen communicated to other SPs.

Major results: WP3.1: Extended literature review on driver modelling. Refinementof layout, characteristics and requirements of the Driver IntentionDetection Module (DIDM), of the Virtual Driver (VD).Implementation of a driver model prototype (VD). Discussion onimplementation of the DIDM on the demo vehicle (CRF). Draft ofD31.2.WP3.2: Design of the different modules that will be part of thedriver monitoring demonstrator installed in the CRF Demo car.Discussion and agreement with CRF of the architecture for theintegration of driver monitoring functions into CRF demo vehicle

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

D32.1 was delivered in delay in 2013. It was decided to evaluate itin 2014.D34.1 is planned to be delivered by M24.

Statement of used resources: AdequateStatement concerning interactionwith other projects:

WP3.1: Continuous benchmark with Interactive. Consideration ofachievements from previous EU research projects (e.g. AIDE,ISIPADAS).WP3.2: DETER (1992-1995) EU-funded project. Work on driverimpairment and the development of telematic systems to monitordriver impairment

SAVE FP4 (1994-1998) System for Effective Assessment ofDriver State and Vehicle Control in Emergency SituationsPROMETHEUS-PROCHIP(1995) R+D project for Improving theReliability and Safety of Automotive ElectronicsAWAKE (2000) FP5 EU granted project Development of Systemsfor effective Assessment of driver vigilance and WarningAccording to traffic risk EstimationSENSATION(2004) FP6 EU granted project Deliverables (2004-2008) ‘Advance sensor development for attention Stressvigilance & sleep Wakefulness Monitoring’PReVENT (2004-2008) Supporting the driver, preventing

Page 15: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 15/90

15

accidentsDissemination and exploitation: Papers presented:

SIE (Società Italian Ergnonomia e Fattori Umani) X Congress,Turin, 18-20 November 2013

DESERVE: driving simulation tests to support the design andimplementation of an algorithm able to recognize in real time theintention of the driver, Serena Fruttaldo, Giulio Francesco BianchiPiccinini, Daniele Pinotti

Conference courses SPIE 2014 Electronic imaging science andTechnology, San Francisco (CA) 2nd-6th of February 2014.[participation to the event was cancelled, finally]

''Driver workload monitoring in heavy good vehicles and on poweredtwo-wheelers'', P. Pyykönen, M. Kutila, T. Niemeläinen, A. Saccagno, D.Daurenjou, Dr. S. Boverie

DESERVE SS at SAMOS Conference, July 15 2014Definition of an Embedded Driver Model for Driving Behavior Pre-dictionwithin the DESERVE Platform, Jens Klimke, Philipp Themann, ChristophKlas and Lutz Eckstein

21TH ITS WC - DETROIT, SEPTEMBER 7-11 2014Definition Of A Microscopic Traffic Simulations Driver Model For Inter-UrbanIntersections for 21st World Congress, Jens Klimke, Fréderic Christen, Lutz Eckstein

WP31 Driver Modelling (ICOOR)2nd year objectives: Development of a specific driver model module, addressing the

prediction and classification of driver’s intentions, that will beintegrated into the DESERVE platform.Discussion on the implementation of the DM modules

Summary of progress: Development of two modules: a general driver model and aspecific driver intention classifier that will be integrated intothe DESERVE platform. It will include a DIDM and a tool (virtualdriver) for platform testing

Driver Intention Detection Module (DIDM):SOA of existing solutions for driver’s intention recognition hasbeen completed.Some (old) datasets have been used to start theimplementation phase, coming from previous EU projects.Machine Learning (ML) has been selected as the mostappropriate techniques for the classification and recognition ofdriver’s intentions that is the vehicle manoeuvres.A dedicated experimental phase with data collected in real-time using the DESERVE prototype vehicle has been plannedfor March-April 2015.Manoeuvres and input/output variables are under definition.

Virtual Driver (VD):Extended literature review on driver modeling with a specialfocus on intersectionsDefinition of a suitable software architecture for a driver modelin Matlab/Simulink/StateflowDefinition of digital road, intersection and round-aboutstructures as input for driver models

Page 16: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 16/90

16

Implementation of the required interfaces and softwaremodules with focus on the DESERVE structureAnalysis of manoeuvres and driving states on intersectionsDevelopment of approaches for the technical implementationof these manoeuvresImplementation of a driver model prototypeAnalysis of parameterization and verification processes

Identification of D31.2 structure and content.Major results: Refinement and development of layout, characteristics and

requirements of the DIDM and of the tool (virtual driver) forplatform testing. Draft of D3.1.2

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

D312 will be delivered at M24. The outline of the Driver Model willbe released.The DIDM is planned to be implemented on the vehicle in June2015.It is to finish the implementation of the VD by the end of August2014. Then the VD will be integrated in PELOPS. The full integrationwill be done by June 2015.

Statement of used resources: Adequate.Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:

InteractIVe EU project achievements have been taken intoconsideration for the identification of the DIDM and itsrequirements. AIDE and ISiPADAS EU projects have been also takeninto consideration: in particular some (old) datasets have beenused to start the implementation phase.

Dissemination and exploitation: Transport Research Arena 2014WP32 Driver Monitoring (FICOSA)

2nd year objectives: Objectives were:Definition of a general driver monitoring module that will beintegrated into the DESERVE platform.Development of the Driver Monitoring function prototypesthat will use D32.1 General Driver Monitoring prototypingdefinition as reference.Agreement with CRF on the architecture for the integration ofdriver monitoring functions into CRF demo vehicle.

Summary of progress: FICOSA defined in cooperation with CONTI the architecture of theDriver Monitoring Module, which combines input from severalsystems of the vehicle and from cameras. To this scope, severalconference calls were held among FICOSA, Continental and CRF toclarify the specific approaches to Driver monitoring, and theimplementation on the demo vehicle.

First deliverable completed in Sept 2013: D32.1 General drivermonitoring module definition.

Major results: Deliverable D32.1 is a report including:Summary of existing solutions. Detailed analysis the differentmarket solutions regarding drowsiness detection, cognitivedistraction and visual distraction.Definition of a general driver monitoring module. Architecturelayout of the general driver monitoring modules to be include

Page 17: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 17/90

17

in DESERVE platform.Development of an experimental driver monitoring module:Definition of the different modules to be included in theexperimental driver monitoring module.

Currently FICOSA is working in the design of the different modulesthat will be part of the driver monitoring demonstrator installed inthe CRF Demo car.

Meanwhile, it was discussed and agreed with CRF thearchitecture for the integration of driver monitoring functionsinto CRF demo vehicle. CRF is working on the preparation andinstallation of demo vehicle.

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

Deliverable D32.1 was issued with one day of delay with respect tothe expiration date in 2013. It was then decide to evaluate it in2014.

Statement of used resources: No significant deviation in the number of planned person-monthsStatement concerning interactionwith other projects:

For the preparation of the State of the Art and definition of theDESERVE architecture for driver monitoring we have consultedothers, documentation from the following projects:

DETER (1992-1995) EU-funded project. Work on driverimpairment and the development of telematics systems tomonitor driver impairmentSAVE FP4 (1994-1998) System for Effective Assessment ofDriver State andVehicle Control in Emergency SituationsPROMETHEUS-PROCHIP(1995) R+D project for Improving theReliability and Safety of Automotive ElectronicsAWAKE (2000) FP5 EU granted project Development of Systemsfor effective Assessment of driver vigilance and WarningAccording to traffic risk EstimationSENSATION(2004) FP6 EU granted project Deliverables (2004-2008) ‘Advance sensor development for attention Stressvigilance & sleep Wakefulness Monitoring’PReVENT (2004-2008) Supporting the driver, preventingaccidentsHOLIDES (currently on-going) EU project under the ARTEMISframework program.

For more information, see documents in ‘D32.1 General drivermonitoring module definition’ deliverable

Dissemination and exploitation: Collaboration with VTT and Continental for the presentation of thepaper ‘’Driver workload monitoring in heavy good vehicles and onpowered two-wheelers’’ presented in the conference courses SPIE2014 Electronic imaging science and Technology hold in SanFrancisco (CA) from the 2nd-6th of February 2014.

WP34 Innovative Integrated HMI (CRF)2nd year objectives: The main objective of the WP3.4 is to exemplify the general

solution defined in the WP3.3 in order to develop a HMI prototype.It aims at completing the analysis of the requirements to define aconcrete HMI solution that selects a limited number of hardware

Page 18: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 18/90

18

and software components from the DESERVE platform.Summary of progress: The HMI solution design has been defined, according to the inputs

given from WP33 on user needs analysis and HMI requirements.A strict link is highlighted with the previous deliverables of the SP3Driver behaviour – HMI D3.3.1 “HMI Needs Analysis andSpecifications”, describing the HMI user needs, and D3.3.2“Definition of a general integrated HMI solution”, analysing themain HMI solutions available on the market for the ADAS andhighlighting design guidelines for the final DESERVE HMI solutions.

The general HMI solution is based on the previous experiencedeveloped in the interactIVe project, considered as the last mainproject dealing with ADAS interface.The deliverable D3.4.1, main output of the task T3.4.1, completesthe analysis of the requirements and specification for the HMImanager involved in the arbitration of the information to beprovided to the driver, the modalities of the representation (visual,audio, haptic, etc…) and, in case, the sharing of the resources(among several displays in the vehicle, use of the audio speakersfor the radio, etc…).

A description of the HMI of each demonstrator is proposed, if any,starting from the architecture, going through the HW componentsand arriving at the general description of the graphics draft –foreseen sketches.The modularity and the flexibility of the proposed HMI are able tocover several HMI requirements of different ADAS applicationsboth for passenger cars and commercial vehicles.

Major results: D3.4.1 HMI solution design.

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

Deliverable D34.1 was delivered on 1st , September.

Statement of used resources: Delayed use of planned person/months from CRFStatement concerning interactionwith other projects:

AIDE and interactIVe projects used as input to the work.

Dissemination and exploitation: No dissemination activities in the period

Page 19: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 19/90

19

SP4 Test Case Functions (BOSCH)

2nd year objectives: In SP4 – Test case functions the main objective for the first year is toconduct the preparatory work for the different DESERVE platformmodules, namely the warning functions, the control functions, thevulnerable road user protection functions, the automated functions,the cooperative system functions and the Inter-urban assist specificfunctions. Implementation and testing both on laboratory level and insub-module is crucial for the final transfer in the demonstrators ofSP5.

Summary of progress: All six WP’s of SP4 started their work in 2013. Discussion andcollaboration was mainly done within the WP’s and, where necessary,with the partners working in SP1 and SP2 on the respectiverequirement specification and platform architecture definition.

Major results: The major results elaborated in the WP’s are documented in therespective deliverables, namely D4.1.1 – Warning functions solutiondesign, D4.2.1 – Control functions solution design, D4.3.1 – VRUprotection functions design, D4.4.1 – Automated functions solutiondesign, D4.5.1 – cooperative systems functions solution design andD4.6.1 – Platform requirements and specification for inter-urbanassist.

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

Some of the Deliverables for Month12 are already submitted whileothers are in the final drafting stage or in the peer review process.The delayed deliverables are tightly monitored and distinct deadlinesto proceed with the finalizations are taken by the respectivedeliverable responsible.

Statement of used resources: Resources are used as planned with some over- or under-spending byindividual reasons, expressed in the respective partner section, whereapplicable.

Statement concerninginteraction with other projects:

Interaction with other projects was minor because the SP4 work israther focussed on the DESERVE demonstrators in SP5.

Dissemination and exploitation: Dissemination activities were mainly done on the InternationalConference on embedded Computer Systems: Architectures,Modeling and Simulation , SAMOS XIV in SAMOS Island – Greece fromJuly 14th to 17th, 2014 .

WP41 Warning Functions (ASL)2nd year objectives: Specify the warning functions to be used as test cases for the

project.Implement the processes specified in deliverable D41.1.Specify the warning function interfaces to be used for the testcases.Implement the prototype warning functionsInstall the prototype warning functions inside DESERVE platformStart testing the prototype warning functions inside the DESERVEplatformPrepare for the deliverable D41.2 (for just after the 2nd period).

Summary of progress: Completion of deliverable D41.1. Several teleconferences and aworkshop in Lewes to try and identify DESERVE platform. Discussionswith SP2 leaders, especially leading to Technical Assembly in GoudaFeb 2014. Partner’s identification of each own implementation of

Page 20: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 20/90

20

DESERVE platforms. Partner’s implementations thereof (in progress).Partners implementations of warning functions. Second series ofteleconferences summer 2014 leading to definition of deliverables forD41.2.

Major results: Deliverable D41.1 (which was delayed). Partner’s individualimplementations and testing. Preparation for D41.2.

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

Almost no partners would be able to make a full deliverable ofdemonstrable prototypes in M24 – work is running late largelybecause of preceding delays. Some partners could deliver in M26-28.All substantive partners are in favour of using the planned 6 monthextension to delay the WP41.2 deliverable to M30.

Statement of used resources: Partners have used less resources than planned with as theimplementation work was delayed starting by delays in earlier SPs.

Statement concerninginteraction with other projects:

This WP has used inputs from SP1 and has proposed inputs to SP2and SP5.

Dissemination and exploitation: No dissemination and exploitation so far.WP42 Control Functions (IKA)

2nd year objectives: Requirements for test-case function have been done. Solutionidentification and design have been done. The results aredocumented in D4.2.1. The control function development has started.Interfaces and modules are defined and are in the implementationprocess. Results will be delivered in D4.2.2. First lab/simulation testswill be done.

Summary of progress: Development phase:The interfaces to the platform are specified and synchronisedwith the perception and IWI platform of DESERVEThe basic algorithms for the function are defined and somemodules are under implementation, several teleconf have beenperformed in order to handle integration of modules developedby other partners involved in control functions developmentThe tool chains are fully specified and built up in the labs. Somemodules have been developed in order to assure data exchangebetween different tools.Some scenarios have already been defined and implemented inPrescan in order to test control function during MIL simulation.The demonstrators and lab devices are in the built up phase tobe basis of the implementation

Major results: To be reported in D4.2.2:Interface specificationAlgorithm definition and implementationTest-case specification and testingOutline of the results

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

No deviations in this period.

Statement of used resources: Most resources are used for personal costs. Some partners have usedless resources than planned as the implementation work was delayedstarting by delays in earlier SPs.

Statement concerninginteraction with other projects:

No interaction with other projects in relation with this WP

Dissemination and exploitation: No dissemination or exploitation activities related to this WP during

Page 21: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 21/90

21

this periodWP43 Vulnerable Road User Protection Functions (CTAG)

2nd year objectives: Development of the VRU protection functions prototypes using thedeliverable D4.3.1 – VRU protection functions solution design, asstarting point.The results will be part of the deliverable D4.3.2 – VRU protectionfunctions prototypes.

Summary of progress: 2nd year main tasks (tasks 4.3.2 and tasks 4.3.3):Use of deliverable D4.3.1 as starting point for the developmentof the VRU module.Identification of the main blocks that will form part of the VRUprotection functions prototype. The VRU module will be formedby 2 main layers: ROI detection layer and ROI analysis layer.Development of the ROI (Region Of Interest)detection blocksbased on RTMapsDevelopment of the ROI analysis blocks based on RTMapsLaboratory and virtual testing of the two above mentioned layers(VRU module).Data recording for test and development purposesElaboration of the deliverable D 4.3.2

Major results: Deliverable D4.3.2VRU module could be tested within one of the CRF demonstratorvehicles

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

No major deviations from the planning

Statement of used resources: No deviations in the number of planned person-monthsStatement concerninginteraction with other projects:

No interaction with other projects in relation with this WP

Dissemination and exploitation: No dissemination or exploitation activities related to this WP duringthis period

WP44 Automated Functions (INRIA)2nd year objectives: The purpose WP44 (dealing with the development of Automated

Functions in the framework of DESERVE project) is to proposeautomated manoeuvres, based on the requirements defined in D44.1(Automated functions solution design).This WP year objectives describe the tasks T4.4.2.- Development ofprototype solutions- and T4.4.3. -Laboratory and virtual testing-,where the SW platform of DESERVE is used through RTMaps, and thevisual testing utilize two different environment simulators for ActiveSafety Systems: ProSivic and PreScan.

Summary of progress: A description of the Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related toOn-Road Motor Vehicle Automated Driving Systems normative(SAEJ3016) were done.,The developed of some of the modules (automated functions)considered this normative.An explication prototype solutions in term of fully and semi-automated functions is presented.Simulations and virtual testing developed in the WP are presented inD44.2.

Major results: Applications on simulationsin ProSivic and PreScan were developed.

Page 22: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 22/90

22

Deliverable D44.2 Automated functions prototypes.Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

Not delay expected for D44.2

Statement of used resources: INRIA has some modification in the estimated person-months. Now,we have 12 P/M instead of 42 P/M.

Statement concerninginteraction with other projects:

There is an interaction with other SPs. Specifically with WP24(Arbitration and control), WP51 and WP52 (Passenger CarApplications and Passenger Car Applications).Contributions from WP13 were considered.

Dissemination and exploitation: IEEE-IV 2014: Dynamic Trajectory Generation Using Continuous-Curvature Algorithms for Door to Door Assistance Vehicles, June2014.

WP45 Cooperative Systems Functions (NXP)2nd year objectives: The 2nd year objectives of WP45 are:

Development of the V2X technology as 802.11p communicationlink including relevant standards (such as ETSI).High level design of interfaces and functions to enable V2Xtechnology as virtual sensor for cooperative systems.Develop test scenarios to demonstrate V2X technology.

Summary of progress: Participated in the DESERVE Technical General Assembly asorganized by Technolution in Gouda, The Netherlands onFebruary 5 and 6, 2014.Finished D4.5.1 containing requirements for the V2X module,hardware and software architecture of the module and proposedcooperative test case functions.Within the scope of task 4.5.2 cooperative modules are providedto Technolution, who is developing cooperative test casefunctions. Also cooperative module are about to be delivered toIrseem together with software interfacing the cooperativemodule to RTMaps using high level CAM and DENM interfaces.This interfacing software is developed by NXP. CRF is focusing onsimulation (using CarMaker tool) of ACC applications and inparticular on speed adaptation use cases based on digital mapsand V2x communication.Task 4.5.3, development of initial prototype of V2X technology, isfinished. The initial prototype is tested extensively at the ETSIplugtest and during the development of the test case functions.Task 4.5.4, development of the final prototype of V2X technologyis currently still ongoing.

Major results: Initial prototype of V2X technology finishedDevelopment of final prototype of V2X technology is progressingaccording to plan.Development of test scenarios is well underway.

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

Deliverable D4.5.1 did finish late. D4.5.2 will be delivered few monthsin delay.

Statement of used resources: According to plan.Statement concerninginteraction with other projects:

This WP takes as input the Deserve platform architecture as definedby SP1 and SP2 and aligns the interface towards the virtual sensor.Furthermore, requirements are checked vis-à-vis projects as TEAM,VRUITS and MOBINET.

Page 23: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 23/90

23

Dissemination and exploitation: V2X technology design and architecture has been discussed andvalidated with key customers and OEMs.

WP46 Inter-urban Assist (DAIMLER)2nd year objectives: Finer decomposition of previously specified IUA-function(s) into

functional blocks. Repartition and distribution of this functionalblocks into different hardware blocks within the DESERVE platformconcept. Specification and start of implementation of IUA functions inspecific modules of the perception layer in cooperation with theinvolved partners.

Summary of progress: The specification of the functionality and the architecture of the IUAwere finalized. The Inter-Urban Assist will offer three mainfunctionalities: augmented night vision, pedestrian warning andadaptive light control.Different sub-modules were identified and described in the alreadysubmitted Deliverable D46.1 – Platform requirements andspecification for inter urban assist.The finer decomposition of this sub-modules, which includes thepartitioning and distribution of these functional blocks into differenthardware blocks of the DESERVE platform is ongoing with goodprogress. The finer specification (and first implementation results)will be described in the deliverable D46.2 – Inter urban assistprototype system description scheduled for submission in M24.

Major results: Major results of the second year are Deliverable D46.1 – Platformrequirements and specification for Inter-Urban Assist and theplanned deliverable D46.2 – Inter urban assist prototype systemdescription planned (with a small expected delay) until the end ofSeptember 2014 (M25).

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

Short delay (of approximately one month) of deliverable D46.2 – Interurban assist prototype system description due to the largely delayedproject start.

Statement of used resources: Resources are used as planned with a still slight underspending.Statement concerninginteraction with other projects:

Interaction with other projects was minor because the SP4 work israther focussed on the DESERVE demonstrators that will be realizedin SP5.

Dissemination and exploitation: Dissemination activities were done on the International Conferenceon embedded Computer Systems: Architectures, Modelling andSimulation, SAMOS XIV in SAMOS Island – Greece from July 14th to17th, 2014.“Instruction-Set Extension for an ASIP-based SIFT Feature Extraction”by (Nico Mentzer, Guillermo Paya-Vaya, Holger Blume, Nora vonEgloffstein and Werner R. Ritter) and “A Comprehensive ASIC/FPGAPrototyping Environment to Explore Embedded Processing Systemsfor Advanced Driver Assistance Applications” by Florian Giesemann,Guillermo Paya-Vaya, Holger Blume, Matthias Limmer and WernerRitter.

Page 24: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 24/90

24

SP5 Integration and Tests (CRF)

2nd year objectives: The functions developed in SP4 “Test Case functions” will beintegrated and tested in SP5 “Integration and tests” targetingdifferent applications in passenger cars (WP5.1), commercialvehicles (WP5.2) and motorcycle (WP5.3). The different prototypeswill be tested in virtual and real traffic scenarios.The integration of the ADAS applications in the DESERVEdemonstrator vehicles starts in the second year.

Summary of progress: The setting up of DESERVE demonstrators started in the relevantperiod:

passenger car (CRF, Daimler)commercial vehicle (Volvo).motorcycle (Ramboll)

Major results: The major results are represented by the following deliverables:D511 - Passenger Car - Application definition design.D521 - Commercial Vehicle – Application definition design.

Preparation D53.2 has been completed.Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

Delay in submission of planned deliverables.Requests to be authorised by ARTEMIS:

D522 Commercial Vehicle – Functions integrated onprototypes: M24 delivery date to be postponed to M30CRF proposed to replace the commercial vehicle demonstratorwith a second passenger car (request to be authorised andamended by ARTEMIS).

Statement of used resources: No deviations in the number of planned person-monthsStatement concerning interactionwith other projects:

No interaction with other projects in relation with this WP

Dissemination and exploitation: NoneWP51 Passenger Car Applications (CRF)

2nd year objectives: The main objective the second year has been to implement theADAS applications into the passenger car demonstrators fromDaimler and CRF, according to the specifications planned in the 1st

project year. The planned Daimler application to be implemented isInterurban Assist, and the planned CRF applications include AEBpedestrian, driver distraction and driver intention.

Summary of progress: Partners (Daimler and CRF) have been working on implementingthe passenger car applications as planned in D51.1 “Passenger Car-Application definition design”, specified in the 1st project year.CRF democar is available:

Integrated sensors: SMS MRR, Conti LDW camera, Contiinterior camera.Preliminary functions integration of AEB pedestrian and driverdistraction.Use of dSPACE embedded platform with RTMaps/Symulinktoolchain.

Major results: D511 - Passenger Car - Application definition design submittedin October 2013.D51.2 Passenger Car - Functions integrated on prototypes

Page 25: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 25/90

25

(M30) is progressing.CRF democar available.

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

No deviations.

Statement of used resources: Number of planned person-months less than planned.Underspending from CRF.

Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:

No interaction with other projects in relation with this WP.

Dissemination and exploitation: NoneWP52 Commercial Vehicle Applications (VOLVO)

2nd year objectives: The main objective of the second year has been to implement thedriver support applications into the commercial vehicledemonstrators from Volvo and CRF, according to the specificationsplanned in the 1st project year. The planned Volvo applications tobe implemented are ACC and AEBS, and planned CRF applicationsinclude AEB interurban, driver drowsiness and driver intention.

Summary of progress: Partners (Volvo, CRF and IRSEEM) have been working onimplementing the commercial vehicles applications as planned inD52.1 “Commercial Vehicle- Application definition design”,specified in the 1st project year.

Major results: Preparation D52.2Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

Delayed submission of the planned deliverable D52.2, due M24.Planned to be submitted in same time frame as D51.2, due M30.CRF is planning to replace the commercial vehicle demonstratorwith a second passenger car (request to be authorised andamended by ARTEMIS). CRF will start the implementation at thebeginning of 2015.

Statement of used resources: Number of planned person-months less than planned.

Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:

No interaction with other projects in relation with this WP.

Dissemination and exploitation: NoneW53 Motorcycle Applications (VTT)

2nd year objectives: The main intention is to implement the rider support system to themotorcycle according to the specifications planned in the 1st

project year. The first prototype will be implemented includingrider activity monitoring and some co-operative ADAS functionswhich can be used for further adaptation of the system to reachthe DESERVE object in this specific application area.

Summary of progress: Major progress steps were:The first co-operative motorcycle prototype was introduced inthe ITS Europe, Helsinki on 16-19 June 2014The VTT’s driver monitoring application is running in theembedded motorcycle environmentThe portable user interface, developed accoding to the WP3.2plans, has been implemented

Major results: Preparation D53.2 has been completedDeviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

-

Statement of used resources: -

Page 26: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 26/90

26

Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:

-

Dissemination and exploitation: The prototype was introduced in the ITS Europe exhibition, Helsinkion 16-19 June 2014. Wide attention was received especially fromthe world leading motorcycle manufacturers.

Page 27: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 27/90

27

SP6 Validation and Evaluation (CRF)

2nd year objectives: SP6 “Validation and evaluation” will be focused in the second yearon the validation of the DESERVE Platform by defining a detailedvalidation plan (WP6.1) to assess the benefit during the design anddevelopment of the prototyped functions and systems (such asdevelopment costs, software reusability and reduction of time fordevelopment) during a complete validation test.

Summary of progress: The Validation plan, defined in D6.1 report, is responsible for theproject baseline with the performance indicators and the processevaluation to assess the achievement of the project objectives tovalidate all the phases.

Major results: D61.2 Validation Plan, draft available at the current date.Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

Delayed submission of the planned D612 deliverable (18M +7months).

Statement of used resources: Number of planned person-months less than planned.

Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:

No interaction with other projects

Dissemination and exploitation: NoneWP61 Validation Plan (INRIA)

2nd year objectives: The definition and criteria for Validation Plan.The definition of performance indicators.The deliverable D61.2 Validation Plan is planned.

Summary of progress: D61.2 report provides the Validation plan, according to the Artemistargets, for the DESERVE project. The validation has been setfollowing two approaches, qualitative (feedback from users) andquantitative (measurable KPIs). Test scenarios were considered foreach demonstrator.The structure of the deliverable is provided.Many inputs from different partners are expected to finish D61.2but the report is going to be submitted within M25.

Major results: D61.2 Validation Plan.Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

Delayed submission of the planned deliverable D61.2 (+7 months).

Statement of used resources: Number of planned person-months less than plannedINRIA has 4 PMs instead of 6 PMs in this WP.

Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:

There is no interaction with other WPs.

Dissemination and exploitation: There is not dissemination results expected.WP62 Validation Tests (CRF)

2nd year objectives: Not started.Summary of progress: -Major results: -Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

-

Statement of used resources: -

Page 28: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 28/90

28

Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:

-

Dissemination and exploitation: -

Page 29: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 29/90

29

SP7 Dissemination and Exploitation (ICOOR)

2nd year objectives: Planning and organization of the first project workshop. Planning ofparticipation to events and conferences and preparation of relateddissemination material. Publication of papers and articles. Update ofthe website. Presentation of DESERVE’s goals and firstachievements, publications e.g. articles.Start organization of the final event between October 2015 andFebruary 2016.7.2 objectives missing

Summary of progress: The website has been updated in particular in order to includenews, events and relevant dissemination material. Presentation ofDESERVE at events and conferences. Organization of the first projectworkshop within the SAMOS conference (http://samos-conference.com/).Planning and organization of the project final event has beenstarted.

Major results: The first project workshop has been organized within the SAMOSconference.Partners have been encouraged to disseminate project goals andresults: articles and papers have been presented and published atinternational events and in particular:

SIE (Società Italian Ergnonomia e Fattori Umani) X Congress,Turin, 18-20 November 2013.

DESERVE: driving simulation tests to support the design andimplementation of an algorithm able to recognize in real time theintention of the driver, Serena Fruttaldo, Giulio Francesco BianchiPiccinini, Daniele Pinotti

EUCAR CONFERENCE 2013 – 5-6 November 2013, BrusselsDESERVE Poster

EUROPMENT (European Society for Applied Sciences andDevelopment) Conferences in Interlaken, Switzerland, 22-Sunday 23- Monday 24 February 2014

Project ownership and steering committee challenges in internationalcontext, Matti Kutila, Maria Jokela, Serena Fruttaldo, Roberto Montanari,Nereo Pallaro

Conference courses SPIE 2014 Electronic imaging science andTechnology, San Francisco (CA) 2nd-6th of February 2014[participation to the event was cancelled, finally]

‘’Driver workload monitoring in heavy good vehicles and on poweredtwo-wheelers’’, ''Driver workload monitoring in heavy good vehicles andon powered two-wheelers'', P. Pyykönen, M. Kutila, T. Niemeläinen, A.Saccagno, D. Daurenjou, Dr. S. BoverieTRA (Transport ResearchArena) 2014 conference - 14-17 Apr 2014 Paris La Défense(France)

2014 IEEE INTELLIGENT VEHICLES SYMPOSIUM - June 8 - 11,2014, Dearborn, Michigan, USA

Arbitration for Balancing Control between the Driver and ADAS Systemsin an Automated Vehicle: Survey and Approach, Philippe Morignot,Joshue Perez Rastelli and Fawzi NashashibiDynamic trajectory generation using continuous-curvature algorithms fordoor to door assistance vehicles, Joshue Perez, Ray Lattarulo and FawziNashashibi

Page 30: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 30/90

30

10th ITS European Congress, Helsinki, Finland on 16–19 June2014

DESERVE project: Design and development of an innovative platform forADAS, Serena Fruttaldo, Matti Kutila, Pasi Pyykönen, Paul vanKoningsbruggen, Joshué Pérez-Rastelli

21TH ITS WC - DETROIT, SEPTEMBER 7-11 2014Definition Of A Microscopic Traffic Simulations Driver Model For Inter-Urban Intersections for 21st World Congress, Jens Klimke, FrédericChristen, Lutz Eckstein

WSEASAdvanced Study of Project Ownership Challenges in ResearchOrganisation, , Matti Kutila, Maria Jokela, Serena Fruttaldo, RobertoMontanari, Nereo Pallaro

WILEY PUBLICATIONVehicle control in ADAS applications -State of the art, Joshué Pérez 1 andDavid Gonzalez1 and Vicente Milanés

Mid-Term results have been presented in a DESERVE Special Sessionwithin the SAMOS conference on July 15th (Embedded DriverAssistance Systems: Mid-Term Results of the DESERVE Artemis-JU-project). 7 papers have been submitted:

The DESERVE project: Towardsfuture ADAS functions

M. Kutila, P. Pyykönen, P. vanKoningsbruggen, N. Pallaro, J.Rastelli

A Comprehensive ASIC/FPGAPrototyping Environment toExplore Embedded ProcessingSystems for Advanced DriverAssistance Applications

Florian Giesemann, GuillermoPaya-Vaya, Holger Blume,Matthias Limmer, WernerRitter

Development and design of aplatform for arbitration andsharing control applications –aDESERVE approach-

Joshué Pérez, David González,Fawzi Nashashibi, Fabio Tango,Nereo Pallaro, GwenaelDunand, André Rolfsmeier

Vehicle-Hardware-In-The-LoopSystem for ADAS Prototypingand Validation

C. Galko, R. Rossi, X. Savatier

Instruction-Set Extension for anASIP-based SIFT FeatureExtraction

Nico Mentzer, Guillermo Paya-Vaya, Holger Blume, Nora vonEgloffstein, Werner R. Ritter

Definition of an EmbeddedDriver Model for DrivingBehavior Pre-diction within theDESERVE Platform

Jens Klimke, Philipp Themann,Christoph Klas and LutzEckstein

Massively parallel signalprocessing challenges within adriver assistant prototypeframework First case studyresults with a novel MIMO-Radar

Frank Meinl, Martin Kunert,Holger Blume

A draft of D713 (Workshop Report 1) has been submitted. The finaldeliverable will be released after the SAMOS event.

Page 31: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 31/90

31

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

A draft of D713 (Workshop Report 1) has been submitted. The finaldeliverable will be released after the SAMOS event.D722 (M24) and D723 (M18) are delayed.

Statement of used resources: Used resources are adequateStatement concerning interactionwith other projects:

Benchmark with Dissemination activities in previous EU projects(e.g. TeleFOT)

Dissemination and exploitation: See activities outlined in WP 7.1WP71 Dissemination (ICOOR)

2nd year objectives: Planning and organization of the first project workshop. Planningand participation to events and conferences and preparation ofrelated dissemination material. Publication of papers and articles.Update of the website.Start organization of the final event in 2015.

Summary of progress: Mid-term results have been disseminated, via te participation tointernational events and via the first project workshop, organized asa Special Session within the SAMOS conference.

Major results: Partners have been encouraged to disseminate project goals andresults: articles and papers have been presented and published atinternational events.In particular DESERVE has been presented via the followingpublications:

SIE (Società Italian Ergnonomia e Fattori Umani) X Congress,Turin, 18-20 Novembre 2013.

DESERVE: driving simulation tests to support the design andimplementation of an algorithm able to recognize in real time theintention of the driver, Serena Fruttaldo, Giulio Francesco BianchiPiccinini, Daniele Pinotti

EUCAR CONFERENCE 2013 – 5-6 November 2013, BrusselsDESERVE Poster

EUROPMENT (European Society for Applied Sciences andDevelopment) Conferences in Interlaken, Switzerland, 22-Sunday 23- Monday 24 February 2014

Project ownership and steering committee challenges in internationalcontext, Matti Kutila, Maria Jokela, Serena Fruttaldo, Roberto Montanari,Nereo Pallaro

TRA (Transport Research Arena) 2014 conference - 14-17 Apr2014 Paris La Défense (France)

DESERVE poster

2014 IEEE INTELLIGENT VEHICLES SYMPOSIUM - June 8 - 11,2014, Dearborn, Michigan, USA

Arbitration for Balancing Control between the Driver and ADAS Systemsin an Automated Vehicle: Survey and Approach, Philippe Morignot,Joshue Perez Rastelli and Fawzi NashashibiDynamic trajectory generation using continuous-curvature algorithms fordoor to door assistance vehicles, Joshue Perez, Ray Lattarulo and FawziNashashibi

10th ITS European Congress, Helsinki, Finland on 16–19 June2014

DESERVE project: Design and development of an innovative platform forADAS, Serena Fruttaldo, Matti Kutila, Pasi Pyykönen, Paul vanKoningsbruggen, Joshué Pérez-Rastelli

21TH ITS WC - DETROIT, SEPTEMBER 7-11 2014Definition Of A Microscopic Traffic Simulations Driver Model For Inter-Urban Intersections for 21st World Congress, Jens Klimke, Fréderic

Page 32: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 32/90

32

Christen, Lutz EcksteinWSEAS

Advanced Study of Project Ownership Challenges in ResearchOrganisation, , Matti Kutila, Maria Jokela, Serena Fruttaldo, RobertoMontanari, Nereo Pallaro

WILEY PUBLICATIONVehicle control in ADAS applications -State of the art, Joshué Pérez 1 andDavid Gonzalez1 and Vicente Milanés

Mid-Term results have been presented in a DESERVE Special Sessionwithin the SAMOS conference on July 15th (Embedded DriverAssistance Systems: Mid-Term Results of the DESERVE Artemis-JU-project). 7 papers have been submitted:

The DESERVE project: Towardsfuture ADAS functions

M. Kutila, P. Pyykönen, P. vanKoningsbruggen, N. Pallaro, J.Rastelli

A Comprehensive ASIC/FPGAPrototyping Environment toExplore Embedded ProcessingSystems for Advanced DriverAssistance Applications

Florian Giesemann, GuillermoPaya-Vaya, Holger Blume,Matthias Limmer, WernerRitter

Development and design of aplatform for arbitration andsharing control applications –aDESERVE approach-

Joshué Pérez, David González,Fawzi Nashashibi, Fabio Tango,Nereo Pallaro, GwenaelDunand, André Rolfsmeier

Vehicle-Hardware-In-The-LoopSystem for ADAS Prototypingand Validation

C. Galko, R. Rossi, X. Savatier

Instruction-Set Extension for anASIP-based SIFT FeatureExtraction

Nico Mentzer, Guillermo Paya-Vaya, Holger Blume, Nora vonEgloffstein, Werner R. Ritter

Definition of an EmbeddedDriver Model for DrivingBehavior Pre-diction within theDESERVE Platform

Jens Klimke, Philipp Themann,Christoph Klas and LutzEckstein

Massively parallel signalprocessing challenges within adriver assistant prototypeframework First case studyresults with a novel MIMO-Radar

Frank Meinl, Martin Kunert,Holger Blume

The final event organization has been started.Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

A draft of D713 (Workshop Report 1) has been submitted. The finaldeliverable will be released after the SAMOS event.

Statement of used resources: adequateStatement concerning interactionwith other projects:

Benchmark with Dissemination activities in previous EU projects e.g.TeleFOT; a page “Links” to other projects, similar or useful toDESERVE scopes, has been created on the website

Dissemination and exploitation: See next pagesWP72 Exploitation, Standardisation and Regulatory Issues (CRF)

Page 33: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 33/90

33

2nd year objectives: The main objective of WP7.2 is to identify and analyse existing andnew markets related to the DESERVE developments and outcomesand to perform a cost benefit analysis at the level of each projectexploitable result.Major focus in the second year is on D72.3 Regulatory Report,planned in month 18.

Summary of progress: The task723 is focused on the collection of European and nationalregulations regarding embedded systems and the research activitiesundertaken in DESERVE. This collection will be preparatory tohighlight any regulatory issue that will have any impact in fulfillingthe dissemination and exploitation plan.The DESERVE framework addresses these standards and regulationswith different level of application, having in mind what is mandatoryfor industrial use and what is planned to be implemented anddemonstrated in the project on a prototype-level.The major technical risks dealing with the general DESERVE platformrequirements, which are affected by the selected standards andregulations, have been identified, and the countermeasures havebeen described for each risk in the contingency plan.

Major results: D723 Regulatory report submitted.Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

WP in delay with respect to the original planning.D722 Standardisation report planned to be postponed at the end ofthe project in order to collect and harmonise the standardisationproposals deriving from the OEM application developments.

Statement of used resources: Number of planned person-months less than planned

Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:

None

Dissemination and exploitation: None

Page 34: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 34/90

34

3.2 Partners progress reports

Finland2nd year objectives: The focus of the Finnish partners during the 2nd project year was to

produce the two prototypes according to the DESERVEspecifications:

1. Professional truck driver simulator2. Motorcycle

In both cases the automotive functions and the driver monitoringsystem were intended to be implemented for supporting theselected ADAS functions in these environments.

Summary of progress: The Finnish partner was actively participating especially to preparethe deliverable 53.2 (Motorcycle pilot prototype). However, TTS,Ramboll and VTT also actively joined to the project workshops forbringing their knowledge to be used by automotive industry andvice versa. Especially, using the common RTMaps interface hasbeen successful decision to quarantee harmonised interfaces.

The motorcycle prototype was introduced in the ITS Europeexhibition in Helsinki on 16-19 June 2014. Moreover, the simulatorenvironment was actively disseminated in the TTS 70 year’scelebrations to wider audience.

Major results: The driver monitoring application has been implemented to theTTS simulator and Ramboll motorcycle environment. The simulatorand motorcycle are running with having the RTMaps platform andsome ADAS functionalities.

The embedded software has been developed to integrate theDESERVE functionalities to the Finnish prototypes and to theDESERVE specifications and validation plans.

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

The whole project runs slightly behind schedule and therefore, 6months extension has been planned and negotiated with theArtemis office.

Statement of used resources: The Finnish partners have used the resources as planned withminor over- and under spending due to late start of theimplementation phase in the project.

Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:

Cooperation has been done with VRUITS-EU-FP7 project which isintended to validate some DESERVE functionalities.

Dissemination and exploitation: The DESERVE presentation has been made in the ITS Europe,Helsinki, 16-19 June 2014 conference in which 2000 automotiveand traffic professional joined to the event.

VTT presented the project in SAMOS workshop on 15 July 2014 andannounced a press release which brought about 5 articles and aradio interview.

TEKNOLOGIAN TUTKIMUSKESKUS VTT (VTT)Partner number: 12nd year objectives: VTT has focused its’ effort to two main issues:

Page 35: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 35/90

35

coordinating the whole projectdeveloping driver monitoring system to the Finnishdemonstrators

In addition, the user interface has been designed to thedemonstration purpose which has been adapted to the simulatorfor assisting professional truck driver training.

Summary of progress: The first version of the driver monitoring application has beenimplemented to the motorcycle environment and demonstrated tothe wider audience in the ITS Europe exhibition.

Preparation to the project meeting meetings and running thesteering group has required effort to keep the project aligned withthe fine-tuned project vision generated during the 2nd project year.

Major results: The first driver and rider monitoring applications have beendevelopedHMI implementation and tests have been conductedThe 1st year review has been concluded successfullyFinal project implementations integrated to the project demovehicles are under considerationThe motorcycle demonstration was showed in the Rambollstand in the ITS Europe exhibitionSuccessful project workshop in SAMOS has been done

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

The whole project runs slightly behind schedule and therefore, 6month extension to the project has been planned.

Statement of used resources: Resources used so far mainly in demonstration implementationsand coordination.

Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:

Interaction especially with the VRUIT-EU-FP7 project has beenactive.

Dissemination and exploitation: Kutila, M., Pyykönen, P., van Koningsbruggen, P., Pallaro, N. &Pérez-Rastelli, J. 2014. The DESERVE project: Towards futureADAS functions. Proceedings of the International Conferenceon Embedded Computer Systems: Architectures, MOdeling andSimulation (SAMOS XIV). Samos, Greece. 14-17 July 2014. p.308-313.Fruttaldo, S., Kutila, M., Pyykönen, P., van Koningsbruggen, P.,Pérez-Rastelli, J. 2014. DESERVE project: Design anddevelopment of an innovative platform for ADAS. The 10th ITSEuropean Congress. Helsinki, Finland. 16-19 June 2014.Kutila, M. & Fruttaldo, S. 2014. DESERVE project: Design anddevelopment of an innovative platform for ADAS. The posterpresented in the Transport Research Arena 2014 (TRA2014).Paris, France, 14-17 Apr 2014.Kutila, M., Jokela, M., Fruttaldo, S., Montanari, R. & Pallaro, N.2014. Project ownership and steering committee challenges ininternational context. Proceedings of the 2014 InternationalConference on Economics, Management and Development(EMD2014). Interlaken, Switzerland. 22-24 Feb 2014. pp. 35-40.

TYÖTEHOSEURA RY (TTS)

Page 36: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 36/90

36

Partner number: 222nd year objectives: TTS has progressed with SP4, SP5 and SP6. TTS’s main focus is

driver monitoring and driver skills recognition for simulator andcommercial vehicle applications.TTS’s main focus includes educational functionality of drivermonitoring applications.

Objectives are the test cases planning and test platform developingof a driver monitoring module.

TTS has been in close cooperation with Ramboll and VTT especiallywith the development of the face recognition for commercialvehicles driver simulator tests.

Summary of progress: TTS has produced test platform for driver monitoring software.Test platform has developed mainly for simulator use, but ispossible to use with real vehicles at future tests. TTS has done co-operation with Finnish partners Ramboll and VTT.TTS has taken part of the warning functions (WP41) and controlfunctions (WP42) activities (teleconferences and meetings).

Major results: The first driver monitoring applications have been developedwith the test platformData analysis and comparisons between driver monitoring dataand vehicle ADAS functionsSimulator test case designing and developingTests with integration of simulator and gaze recognitionsoftwares

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

The whole project runs slightly behind schedule. The projectconsortium aims at catching up the schedule but TTS has no majorrole on this at the current stage.

Statement of used resources: Resources used so far mainly in SP4.1 (Warning functions), SP4.2(Control functions) and SP5.2 (Commercial vehicle application)

Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:

None

Dissemination and exploitation: NoneRAMBOLL FINLAND OY (RAMB)

Partner number: 242nd year objectives: Develop the motorcycle demonstration implementation and design

user-friendly HMI to motorcycle environment.Summary of progress: Ramboll has been in close cooperation with VTT and TTS especially

with the development of the face recognition for motorcycle ridersand the first prototype was introduced on June 2014.

Major results: The first motorcycle demonstration with CAN interface and drivermonitoring has been implemented.

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

Ramboll made strategic decision to withdraw from the project.

Statement of used resources: Resources used so far mainly for motorcycle demonstrationStatement concerning interactionwith other projects:

Ramboll has cooperated closely e.g. with projects TEAM (7th EUFramework Programme project) and HeERO (ICT PSP programme).

Dissemination and exploitation: Ramboll has prepared demonstration which was presented in ITSEurope, Helsinki, 16-19 June 2014

Page 37: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 37/90

37

France (INRIA)

2nd year objectives: All the French partners are collaborating in WPs in SP1, SP2,SP3,SP4, SP5 and SP6.There is a direct cooperation with the passenger cars of the CRF(driving monitoring, vehicle control and software integration).The integration of all the functions and solutions proposed aretested in the RTMaps software (from Intempora).

Summary of progress: All the French partners participated in the SP2, and some of themin SP3.Different work groups are collaborating in different functions andapplications around both CRF demonstrators.

Major results: Contributions in the database of applications, arbitration andcontrol, Perception platform, platform needs and requirements fordifferent platforms, specifically CRF passenger cars have beendone.All the French partners have participated in the development of thearchitecture and their assigned tasks, for all the use cases andplatforms.

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

No technical or scientific deviations.

Statement of used resources: The person-months of the French partner were redefined.Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:

Some partners have direct collaboration, e.g.: INRIA has interactionwith ARMINES and INTEMPORA, related to common works,projects and students.

Dissemination and exploitation: There have been some dissemination efforts within SP2, SP3 andSP4.

CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE (CONTINENTAL)Partner number: 22nd year objectives: Continental has progressed with SP2, SP3, SP4 and SP5.

Continental’s main focus is ADAS integration and driver monitoringfor passenger car applications in SP2, SP3 and SP5.Continental worked in close cooperation with Intempora, Ficosaand CRF in order to integrate of the driver monitoring applicationfor the passenger car application inside the RtMaps tools, and startthe hardware integration (ADAS – Frontal camera) inside one of thedemonstrator vehicle of CRF.

Summary of progress: Participation to plenary meetingsParticipation to SP meetings:

SP2 for integration on RTMAPS,SP3 for definition of task repartition between partners,inputs/outputs,SP5 for specification of integration into demo vehicle andorganization of the integration in Toulouse.

Document review: 4.3.2Contribution to various deliverablesFollowing CRF request Continental is now participating to 4.1.2:warning definition. 2 mm from 2.2 are used to perform the related

Page 38: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 38/90

38

tasksComponent integration into RTMAPS: driver monitoring algorithm,light synchronisation etc.Developments of algorithm module for face tracking, distractionand drowsiness and integration in RTMAPS.Development of camera prototype with synchronized light units tobe integrated in vehicles cockpit.Study on eye safety requirements for use of NIR light units insidevehicle cockpit.Definition of functional architecture with CRF for CRF demo cars((Fiat 500 L and JeepXX)Specification and Integration of frontal camera into CRF passengercar. Gateway integration, integration of camera on to windshield.Calibration of camera devices.

Major results: WP3 development of a specific camera integration package for CRFdemo car (Fiat 500 L)WP3/5: integration of DM components on RTMAPSWP2/5: integration of frontal camera on CRF demo car (Fiat 500 L)

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

No major deviation from the plan.

Statement of used resources: 2 PM are transferred to task 4.1.2 to participate to warningstrategy task following CRF request

Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:

NA

Dissemination and exploitation:INSTITUT DE RECHERCHE EN SYSTEMES ELECTRONIQUES

EMBARQUES (IRSEEM)Partner number: 142nd year objectives: Wide angle perception systems prototype (SP2)

Virtual testing framework design (WP2,4,5)Virtual testing platform (WP2,4,5)

Summary of progress: Wide angle perception system has been successfully tested on line-detection application.A Virtual testing framework has been designed and is currentlybeing used by the Virtual testing platform.A Virtual testing platform is currently being built using a chassisdynamometer and multisensor realtime simulation software. Firstresults an ADAS tested on this platform have been presented at theSAMOS XIV Conference.

Major results: Vision-based algorithm for ADAS perception layer using wide anglecamera (1st year)Virtual testing platform for Vehicle-Hardware In The Loopvalidation of ADAS systems: First results achieved, paper presentedat SAMOS 2014.

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

No deviations so far

Statement of used resources: Personnel costs are below what’s expected as the PhD student hasquitted during 1st year. Another PhD student was supposed to berecruited but we have problems finding a good candidate.

Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:

The virtual testing platform is co-developed with another project(SERBER, funded by Institut Carnot ESP).

Page 39: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 39/90

39

Dissemination and exploitation: Total 2 accepted paper in an international conference:Boutteau and al., International Transportation SystemConference, Den Haag, 2013Galko and al., Vehicle-Hardware-In-The-Loop System for ADASPrototyping and Validation (IC-SAMOS 2014)

INSTITUT NATIONAL DE RECHERCHE EN INFORMATIQUE ET ENAUTOMATIQUE (INRIA)

Partner number: 162nd year objectives: To lead the SP2.

To coordinates the activities in different WPs (as leader): WP24,WP44, WP61To collaborate in different WPs in SP1, SP2, SP4, SP5 and SP6.

Summary of progress: As SP2 leaders, we coordinated the activitates and somedevelopments for the platforms. We have contacts with all the WPleader of SP2.We are working closely to Intempora in the dissemination ofRTMaps as useful tool for the integration of the perception andcontrol algorithms in the projects.We are working in the implementation of the use case of the CRFdemonstrators.Besides, we are working in the WP24, especially finishing thedeliverable D24.4.Moreover, we are the leader of WP44, which is in charge ofautomated functions (simulated in ProSivic).We are working in the definition of validation plan for WP61.

Major results: Integration of the partners in the SP2.Definition of the control functions in the CRF demonstrator.Definition of the validation plan (D61.2).Integration of the different sub-modules with RTMaps.Deliverable D24.4, D44.2 and D61.2.

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

No deviations from the objectives

Statement of used resources: The person-months in each WP are as follows:WP1.X = 2 P/M x 3 (instead of 4).WP21 = 16 P/M (instead of 28).WP22 = 6 P/M (instead of 12).WP24 = the same.WP25 = 4 P/M (instead of 7).WP26 = 11 P/M (instead of 18).WP44 = 12 P/M (instead of 42).WP51 = 5 P/M (instead of 10).WP61= 4 P/M (instead of 6).WP82 = 2 P/M (instead of 4).

Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:

INRIA has interaction with the French partners, especially withARMINES, INTEMPORA and CONTINENTAL, who has some commonworks and students.

Dissemination and exploitation: Samos conference: Development and design of a platform forarbitration and sharing control applications –a DESERVEapproach-, July 2014.

Page 40: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 40/90

40

IEEE-IV 2014: Arbitration for Balancing Control between theDriver and ADAS Systems in an Automated Vehicle: Survey andApproach, June 2014.IEEE-IV 2014: Dynamic Trajectory Generation UsingContinuous-Curvature Algorithms for Door to Door AssistanceVehicles, June 2014.Book Chapter: Vehicle control in ADAS applications -State ofthe art-, intelligent transportation systems: technologies andapplications intelligent (Wiley publications).

ASSOCIATION POUR LA RECHERCHE ET LE DEVELOPPEMENT DES METHODESET PROCESSUS INDUSTRIELS - ARMINES (ARMINES)

Partner number: 212nd year objectives: Armines contributes into the reflection process of the definition of

the requirements for the perception layer (under the leadership ofINRIA).

Summary of progress: ARMINES is currently analysing in the perception layer, using itsown sensors and algorithms. The possibility of defining a genericdata format, suitable for the existing sensors and for the futuresones, is studied. Collaboration with INTEMPORA is essential; inorder to assess the final platform.

Major results: Participation of the perception layer specificationsDeviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

No deviation for the Annex I.

Statement of used resources: The person-month of ARMINES in DESERVE are:-WP22 (Perception Layer) = 4 P/M (instead of 13)-WP71 (Dissemination) = 2 P/M (instead of 2).

Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:Dissemination and exploitation: No dissemination or communication yet.

INTEMPORA SA (INT)Partner number: 232nd year objectives: The second year objective was to assist the various partners

developing under the RTMaps software in their development, asfor training, technical support, and custom developments for thevarious software functions and demonstrators.

Summary of progress: Intempora has participated mainly in WP2 for softwaredevelopments on the DESERVE platform. Intempora has alsoattended to the personal meetings and conference calls in whichthey were involved.Intempora has provided a training session to RTMaps in Paris to thepartners. Many developing partners attended.Intempora has worked on the compatibility of RTMaps andSimulink and dSPACE tools.Intempora has developed various sensor interfaces in RTMapsaccording to the needs of the partners (IDS cameras, IBEO laserscanners,…)Intempora has developed the I-DEEP software for automation ofADAS functions testing in coordination with simulators (virtualtesting).

Major results: Two days RTMaps training session in Paris for DESERVE

Page 41: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 41/90

41

partners.Finalized interface between RTMaps and dSpace AutoBox. Betaversion of interfaces between RTMaps and Simulink.First version of the I-DEEP software.

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

There is no serious deviation here.

Statement of used resources:Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:

None

Dissemination and exploitation: New developments have been advertised on Intempora’s website(I-DEEP software, interfaces with Simulink, DDS, dSpace…)The I-DEEP virtual testing solution has been presented at theSafetyAssist conference in Aschaffenburg (May 2014)

Spain (FICOSA)2nd year objectives: CTAG as leader of WP4.3 Vulnerable users protections and FICOSA

leader of WP3.2 Driver Monitoring and Task 5.1.3 Laboratory andvirtual testing, have coordinated the different activities developedwithin these Work Packages and tasks.Additionally FICOSA is now leader of WP6.2.2 for test executionand data colletion. The tests will be hold in CRF and/or Ficosafacilities.

Summary of progress: CTAG and FICOSA have participated in all the active Work packagesof the project: WP2, WP3, WP4, WP5 and WP6, attending to thepersonal meetings and conference calls in which they wereinvolved.

Major results: CTAG - Deliverable D.4.3.1 is a report for the VRU protectionfunctions solution design. In this report, the specific requirementsfor the VRU detection and protection will be analysed coming fromthe general requirements defined on the DESERVE platform.

FICOSA Deliverable D32.1 is a report for the Definition of DESERVEarchitecture for Driver Monitoring including:

Summary of existing solutions.Definition of a general driver monitoring module.Definition of the different modules to be included in theexperimental driver monitoring module.

WP4: Ongoing the adaptation and construction of prototypes fordrowsiness detection through the analysis of the biological datausing a camera, to the DESERVE architecture.WP5: Agreed with CRF the architecture for the integration of drivermonitoring functions into CRF demo vehicle.WP6: Delivered a draft validation plan for Driver Monitoringfunctions.

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

No major deviation from the plan.

Statement of used resources: See table 4.3 Personnel, subcontracting and other major Direct costitems for Beneficiary FicoMirrors.See table 4.18 Personnel, subcontracting and other major Directcost items for Beneficiary CTAG.

Page 42: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 42/90

42

Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:

In WP3.2. Driver Monitoring for the preparation of the state of theart and definition of the DESERVE architecture for drivermonitoring were consulted several projects: DETER, SAVE,PROMETHEUS-PROCHIP, AWAKE, SENSATION, PReVENT…

Dissemination and exploitation: FICOSA has collaborated with VTT and Continental for thepresentation of the paper ‘’Driver workload monitoring in heavygood vehicles and on powered two-wheelers’’ presented in theconference courses SPIE2014 Electronic Imaging Science andTechnology hold in San Francisco (CA) from the 2nd-6th ofFebruary 2014

FICOMIRRORS SA (FICOSA)Partner number: 32nd year objectives: Participate to SP3 - SP4 –SP5 -SP6 activities

Supply the data needed to define the architecture needs andspecificationsLead WP 3.2Prepare Deliverable D32.1Adaptation of the drowsiness detection function through theanalysis of the biological data to the DESERVE architecture.Ficosa Task leader of WP 5.1.3 Laboratory and virtual testing.Ficosa Task leader of WP 6.2.2 for test execution and datacolletion. The tests will be hold in CRF and/or ficosa facilities.

Summary of progress: FICOSA has assisted to several conference calls and physicalmeetings:Steering committee meeting:12 December 2013:Submitted information to SP3 coordinator;web meeting20 March 2014 : We submitted information to CRF, participatedthrough web connection

Technical Meetings:WP3: As leaders of the WP3.2 for Driver Monitoring FICOSAorganized several conference calls and a face-to-face meeting forcompletion of deliverable D32.1WP 4: February 5 and 6th at Gouda (NL) - Technolution officesDuring this face-to-face meeting and in the following conferencecalls different topics related with WP3 and WP4 were discussed.WP 4: June 3 and 4th at Orbassano (Turin) Italy – face-to-facemeeting at CRF offices.Discussion of different topics related with the design andinstallation of the different modules for driver monitoring that willbe integrated in the CRF car demonstrator.

Moreover, different conference calls were hold among FICOSAContinental and CRF to clarify the specific approaches to Drivermonitoring.

WP5 Participation in several conference calls. Ficosa Task leader of

Page 43: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 43/90

43

5.1.3 Laboratory and virtual testing. Agreed with CRF thearchitecture for the integration of driver monitoring functions intoCRF demo vehicle.WP6: Participation in several SP6 conference call meetings for testexecution and data collection. The tests will be hold in CRF and/orFicosa facilities.

Major results: WP3: Leader of WP3.2. Definition of a general driver monitoringmodule that will be integrated into the DESERVE platform.Analysis of existing solutions for driver monitoring and thendefining the overall architecture and the characteristics of a drivermonitoring module by taking into consideration all sensors andsoftware modules that can be connected to the system.Completed. D32.1 submittedWP4: Contributions to the deliverable D41.1 Warning functionssolution design regarding Task 4.1.1.1 Establish functionalrequirements and 4.1.1.4 Design of warning functions. Ongoing thestudies for drowsiness detection through the analysis of thebiological data adapted to the DESERVE architecture, forinstallation in the CRF demo car.WP5: Definition of passenger car scenarios and assignation for taskleader’s roles. FICOSA Task leader of 5.1.3 Laboratory and virtualtesting. Agreed with CRF the architecture for the integration ofdriver monitoring functions into CRF demo vehicle.WP6: Delivered a draft validation plan for Driver Monitoringfunctions.

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

No major deviation from the plan

Statement of used resources: See table 4.3 Personnel, subcontracting and other major Direct costitems for Beneficiary FICOSA.

Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:

For the preparation of the state of the art and definition of theDESERVE architecture for driver monitoring were consulted amongothers, documents from the following projects:

DETER(1992-1995) EU-funded project. Work on driverimpairment and the development of telematic systems tomonitor driver impairmentSAVE 4th FP (1994-1998) System for Effective Assessment ofDriver State and Vehicle Control in Emergency SituationsPROMETHEUS-PROCHIP(1995) R+D project for Improving theReliability and Safety of Automotive ElectronicsAWAKE (2000) FP5 EU granted project Development ofSystems for effective Assessment of driver vigilance andWarning According to traffic risk EstimationSENSATION(2004) FP6 EU granted project Deliverables (2004-2008) ‘Advance sensor development for attention Stressvigilance & sleep Wakefulness Monitoring’PReVENT (2004-2008) Supporting the driver, preventingaccidents

For more information, see documents in ‘D32.1 General driver

Page 44: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 44/90

44

monitoring module definition’ deliverableDissemination and exploitation:

FICOSA has collaborated with VTT and Continental for thepresentation of the paper ‘’Driver workload monitoring in heavygood vehicles and on powered two-wheelers’’ presented in theconference courses SPIE2014 Electronic Imaging Science andTechnology hold in San Francisco (CA) from the 2nd-6th ofFebruary 2014

FUNDACION PARA LA PROMOCION DE LA INNOVACION, INVESTIGACION YDESARROLLO TECNOLOGICO EN LA INDUSTRIA DE AUTOMOCION DE GALICIA

(CTAG)Partner number: 192nd year objectives: CTAG’s second year objectives are:

Support to the elaboration of deliverables D2.2.2 and D2.2.3regarding the definition of the DESERVE platform perceptionmodules.Contribution to the finalization of deliverable D2.4.3. (Thisdeliverable was due on month 12)Involvement in WP3.4 within task T3.4.3 – Integrated HMIVirtual Testing.Coordination of tasks related to WP4.3 – Vulnerable Road UserProtection functions, as CTAG is the WP leader.Involvement in the development of the VRU module, withinthe tasks of WP4.3.Contribution to the elaboration of deliverable D4.3.2 andcoordination of the tasks related to the documentcomposition.Contribution to the finalization of the deliverable D4.4.1. (Thisdocument was due on month 12)Involvement in the development of the prototype solutions ofthe identified automated functions (deliverable D4.4.2).Contribution to the finalization of the deliverable D4.5.1. (Thisdocument was due on month 12)Involvement in the tasks T4.5.2 to T4.5.3 within WP4.5.Collaboration in the definition of the validation plan (WP6.1 –D6.1.2)Cooperation in WP6.2 – Validation test.CTAG will carry out dissemination actions if possible (WP7.1).Peer reviewing tasks of those documents mentioned indeliverable D8.2.1.

Summary of progress: SP2:WP2.2 – CTAG has review deliverables D2.2.2 and D2.2.3 in orderto try and collaborate in them.

WP2.4 – CTAG has attended several phone conferences organazedby INRIA in relation with the finalization of deliverable D2.4.3, thatwas delivered behind scheduled. Also, in relation with tasks withinWP2.4, two main modules have been proposed: arbitration

Page 45: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 45/90

45

controller (IWI manager) and sharing controller( vehicle controller).Currently CTAG is involved in the pending tasks of this WP and theresults of those task will be included in the deliverable D2.4.4, thatwill include a short report considering the 6 levels of automationdefined in SAE-J3016.

SP3:WP3.4 – The beginning of this work package was delayed. In May2014 a request for contribution was sent by the WP leader andcurrently CTAG is reviewing the draft of the deliverable D3.4.1 inorder to try and collaborate.

SP4:WP4.3 - Since the finalization of the first deliverable, periodicphone conferences have been arranged in order to monitor andcoordinate the work carried out by VISLAB and CTAG within thisWP. In these meetings issues like the exchange of calibration datawithin the two layers that will form the VRU module have beendiscussed.During this period, CTAG has developed RtMaps modules for theROI analysis layer of the VRU module. Also, during this period CTAGhas processed the data collection provided by VISLAB.Also, in relation with this WP, CTAG has been in touch with CRF dueto the fact that the VRU module is expected to be integrated withinone of the CRF demonstrator vehicles.

WP4.4 – Once deliverable D4.4.1 was finished, CTAG has attendseveral phone conferences where the pending tasks of this WPwere discussed. In this WP a list of target automated maneuvreshave been identified and also, a list of target scenarios andsimulation tools. CTAG is going to collaborate in the elaboration ofthe deliverable D4.4.2 , in the definition of the automated modulesinterfaces and also in some simulations of those automatedfunctions.

WP4.5 – Once the deliverable D4.5.1 was submitted, CTAG has notreceive any task assignment so we are waiting to receive moreinformation about where the CTAG contribution can be needed.During this period CTAG has attended two SP4 technical meetings(November 2013 – Lewes; February 2014 – Gouda). In thesemeetings input/output interfaces were discussed.Also during this period, CTAG has attended the RtMaps trainingthat was hold on September 2013 in Paris.

SP6:WP6.1 - CTAG was involved in the finalization of deliverable D6.1.1.Also, during this period, CTAG has been actively involved in theelaboration of the elaboration of the validation plan (deliverableD6.1.2), contributing with the questions and research hypothesis ofthe subjective evaluation. Also, CTAG has prepared an evaluationsurvey, based on the UTAUT model.

Page 46: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 46/90

46

WP6.2 – CTAG has not received any task assignment in this WP yet.

SP7:WP7.1 – No dissemination activities have been carried out by CTAGduring this period.

Major results: WP2.4 – Collaboration in the finalization of deliverable D2.4.3and in the elaboration of deliverable D2.4.4WP4.3 – VRU module and deliverable D4.3.2WP4.4 – Collaboration in the elaboration of deliverable D4.4.2and simulation of automated functionsWP6.1 – Collaboration in the finalization of deliverable D6.1.1and contribution to the elaboration of deliverable D6.1.2

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

No major deviations from the plan.

Statement of used resources: See table 4.18 Personnel, subcontracting and other major Directcost items for Beneficiary CTAG.

Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:

No interaction with other projects

Dissemination and exploitation: No dissemination activities have been carried out by CTAG duringthis period.

AustriaAVL LIST GMBH (AVL)

Partner number: 52nd year objectives: Identification and specification of appropriate use- and test cases,

in order to validate the platform-tool-implementations from firstresearch year.

Summary of progress: In the second research year the identification of a proper ADAS-related component and hence the identification of parameters thatcan be optimized was a focus. After thorough investigations it wasdecided to choose one of the steering functions – motor drivenpower steering function, which is the actor for several ADAS-functions – as the component to be optimized. Furtherinvestigations were made to select XCU functions and parameters.

Major results: Manoeuvres for the test cases, which adapts the test onlineaccording to reactions of the system.Identification of appropriate measurement channels that isnecessary for the optimization of the entire system-behaviour,which includes ADAS functions.Setup for virtual testing environment of ADAS-functions (steeringsystem) available.

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

The decision in first year to concentrate on optimization ratherthan on in-vehicle measurement is still valid. Hence, the setup for avirtual simulation and testing environment has been enhanced.

Statement of used resources: The budget and efforts are slightly higher than planned.It is apparent now that the initial planned consumables budget

Page 47: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 47/90

47

should be transferred completely to the personnel costs, since theinitial planned HW will not be needed, but the personnel researchwork is higher than planned.

Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:

No direct interaction with other projects in the second year.

Dissemination and exploitation: Project Presentation in AVL: Annual Research Report 2014

Germany (BOSCH)Summary of progress: The German project partners advanced in the concept and

development of components and tools to be used and applied forin the German Demonstrator “Inter-Urban Assist”. Three nationalface-to-face meetings in 2014 and several conference calls and e-mail correspondence took place.

2nd year objectives: Definition, specification and ongoing work on the specific Inter-Urban Assist demonstrator parts, aligned with the general DESERVEplatform recommendations and guidelines.

Major results: THW components that correspond to the DESERVE sub-layermodules needed for the inter-urban assist (IUA) are under workand soon ready to be integrated in the Inter-Urban Assistdemonstrator. ADTF framework is used as SW developmenttoolchain by the partners.

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

No deviation or corrective action in this reporting period

Statement of used resources: The German partners mainly used the resources as planned withsome underspending over the individual month 13 to 24 with stillremaining underspending from the first year..

Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:

No specific interaction with other projects

Dissemination and exploitation: Four papers on embedded systems were submitted for Germanpartners (Three PhD students from Daimler, IMS and Bosch and ika)on the International Conference on embedded Computer Systems:Architectures, Modeling and Simulation , SAMOS XIV in SAMOSIsland – Greece from July 14th to 17th, 2014

ROBERT BOSCH GMBH (BOSCH)Partner number: 62nd year objectives: Task coordinator for WP22 (Perception layer), SP4 Leader and

project partner in WP4.6 – Inter-urban AssistSummary of progress: Participation in the DESERVE Technical General Assembly in

Gouda/The Netherlands on Feb 5-6, 2014Contribution as SP4-leader in several WP/steering group telecons.Coordination of two DESERVE national face-to-face meetings inGermany.Finalization of SP1 work and continuation of project work withinthe still running or newly starting SPs.First dissemination activities started with publishing of a technicalpaper in the SAMOS conference.

Major results: Within the German Inter-Urban Assist project cooperation:Definition and usage of a common prototyping platform

Page 48: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 48/90

48

(dSPACE Micro-Autobox with KINTEX FPGA)Development of a synchronized NIR Stereo Vision system(common clock) with associated ADTF recording software forIUA night vision perceptionDefinition and realization of a 79 GHz rapid prototype radardevelopment platform that is compliant with the DESERVEconcepts and guidelines

With the European partners on the general DESERVE platformconcept:

Definition of DESERVE perception layer with appropriatedescriptor tablesSpecification of general platform concepts and HW/SWarchitectures

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

No major deviation from DoW/Annex1 that would need correctiveactions

Statement of used resources: Due to delayed project start still some underspending of theplanned resources that is steadily reduced over time.

Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:

Main interaction happened within DESERVE project partners andsome minor exchange with other projects working on similartopics.

Dissemination and exploitation: Massive parallel computing challenges for a driver assistantprototype framework – Frank Meinl (Robert Bosch GmbH),presented at the International Conference on embedded ComputerSystems: Architectures, Modeling and Simulation , SAMOS XIV inSAMOS Island – Greece from July 14th to 17th, 2014

INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG (INFINEON)Partner number: 82nd year objectives: The main contribution of Infineon is focused on WP25 which is the

definition of a common Platform System Architecture.Based on the year 1 deliverables D25.1; D25.3; D25.7 and D25.9work was continued towards the final document versions.

Summary of progress: No deviations from technical annexMajor results: Deliverables D25.2, D25.4 and D25.6 are available as initial

versions.For D25.8 still under discussion what type of representation shouldbe used.

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

n/a

Statement of used resources: Resources have been used according to plan.Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:

n/a

Dissemination and exploitation: WP2.5 results serve as building blocks for other DESERVE activities,and they are not planned for external dissemination a standalonecomponents.

The exploitation will start towards the end of the project, currentlythere are no exploitable results.

DAIMLER AG (DAIMLER)Partner number: 92nd year objectives: Project leader of WP4.6 – Inter-urban Assist

Page 49: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 49/90

49

Summary of progress: Participation in the DESERVE General Assembly Ulm, Germany onOct 9-10, 2013Participation in the DESERVE Technical General Assembly inGouda/The Netherlands on Feb 5-6, 2014Contribution as SP1-leader in several WP/steering groupteleconferences.Participation in two DESERVE national face-to-face meetings inGermany.Finalization of SP1 work and continuation of project work withinWP4.6.First dissemination activities started with publishing of twotechnical papers in the SAMOS conference.

Major results: Within the German Inter-Urban Assist project cooperation:Specification of Inter-Urban Assist (Deliverable D46.1 –Platform requirements and specification for Inter-Urban Assist)Finer decomposition of D46.1 sub-modules (including itsspecification and partial implementation) which will bedescribed in deliverable D46.2 – Inter urban assist prototypesystem description planned (with a small expected delay)until the end of September 2014 (M24)Definition and usage of a common prototyping platform(dSPACE Micro-Autobox with KINTEX FPGA)

With the European partners on the general DESERVE platformconcept:

Specification of general platform concepts and HW/SWarchitectures

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

Deviation from DoW/Annex 1 is mainly in just still moderatedelayed work and resulting missing PM hours due to the large-delayed project start.

Statement of used resources: Due to the large-delayed project start, still moderate less resourcesas planned were used.

Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:

Main interaction happened within DESERVE project partners andsome minor exchange with other projects working on similartopics.

Dissemination and exploitation: Dissemination activities were done on the International Conferenceon embedded Computer Systems: Architectures, Modelling andSimulation, SAMOS XIV in SAMOS Island – Greece from July 14th to17th, 2014.“Instruction-Set Extension for an ASIP-based SIFT FeatureExtraction” by (Nico Mentzer, Guillermo Paya-Vaya, Holger Blume,Nora von Egloffstein and Werner R. Ritter) and “A ComprehensiveASIC/FPGA Prototyping Environment to Explore EmbeddedProcessing Systems for Advanced Driver Assistance Applications”by Florian Giesemann, Guillermo Paya-Vaya, Holger Blume,Matthias Limmer and Werner Ritter.

DSPACE DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROLENGINEERING GMBH (dSPACE)

Partner number: 152nd year objectives: The main objective of dSPACE is the development and testing of

Page 50: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 50/90

50

the prototypes of FPGA Board and embedded PC and the necessarysoftware components.

Summary of progress: dSPACE participated in the DESERVE technical General Assembly inGouda, The Netherlands on Feb. 5-6, 2014 and contributes toseveral WP telecons. dSPACE organized a national face-to-facemeeting in Paderborn, Germany on 12-13 March, 2014. dSPACE istask coordinator for WP2.1.In WP 2.1 a first version of FPGA code has been implemented. ADTFhas been coupled to the DESERVE prototyping platform. In WP2.2dSPACE could finalize a first version of the FPGA prototyping board.The FPGA board has been put into service and has been integratedin the DESERVE prototyping platform. The evaluation conceptsconcerning a high power speed low latency communication bus arestill running in WP2.5. A first version of an embedded PC prototypenecessary for the use of ADAS development software like RTMapsor ADTF has been finished within WP4.6. The embedded PC hasbeen put into service and has been integrated in the prototypingplatform. The DESERVE prototyping platform has been tested anddocumented. It has been delivered to the partner Daimler, Bosch,IMS and CRF.

Major results: Development of FPGA prototyping boardDevelopment of Embedded PC prototypeIntegration of FPGA Board and Embedded PC in rapidprototyping platform

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

No major deviations

Statement of used resources: No major deviationsStatement concerning interactionwith other projects:

The main interaction takes place with the other DESERVE projectpartners.

Dissemination and exploitation:RHEINISCH-WESTFAELISCHE TECHNISCHE HOCHSCHULE AACHEN (IKA)

Partner number: 182nd year objectives: The second year objectives are the implementation of the defined

driver model modules to be combined to a full working drivermodel for traffic simulations on inter-urban intersections. Also adraft implementation of a driver model to use for online predictionhas been done and will be presented on SAMOS conference. Theobjectives in SP4 are the implementation of a control function todemonstrate the usability of the platform. The function shows thepossibility to easily implement a driver supporting ADAS for inter-urban roads. The algorithms, methods of the implementation andtest results have been done partly and will be presentedcompletely in D42.2

Summary of progress: WP3.1 Driver Model• Delayed Deliverable D31.1 has been published• Paper for SAMOS conference has been submitted• Implementation of the driver model modules and integration to

the simulation tool PELOPS has been done partly.WP4.2 Control Function

Interfaces have been specified and implemented into tool

Page 51: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 51/90

51

chain structureTool chain modules have been built upModules to be used for the control function have beenimplementedTest scenarios have been specified

National Consortium• The tool chains used in the function in SP4 have been discussed

and specified. The dSPACE Micro-Autobox II is the centralcommon platform in the consortium. Ika develops withMatlab/Simulink while the other partners use embedded codeand ADTF.

Major results:The main modules for the driver model and for the controlfunction have been implemented. The interfaces are definedand implemented to be used by suitable tools.The needed and implemented algorithms are identified,specified and will be described in the deliverables.The control function is implemented in a test vehicle which isnot a demonstrator in DESERVE but the results will bepresented at the final event and in D42.2

The driver model will be implemented in PELOPS and ademonstration will be done at the final event.

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

No deviations from plan.

Statement of used resources: Recources mainly used for personal costs.Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:

No interactions with other projects.

Dissemination and exploitation: SAMOS Conference: Special Session “DESERVE”: “Definition of anEmbedded Driver Model for Driving Behavior Prediction within theDESERVE Platform”

GOTTFRIED WILHELM LEIBNIZ UNIVERSITAET HANNOVER (IMS)Partner number: 262nd year objectives: Specification and final definition of the Inter Urban Assist

Demonstrator.Continue Implementing the building blocks of the Inter UrbanAssist Demonstrator.Dissemination Activity.

Summary of progress: In national face-to-face meetings in Germany (Ulm,Paderborn), the algorithms and general structure of the InterUrban Assist Demonstrator were defined. (D46.1)Ongoing work in implementation of two selected ADASalgorithms as the building blocks of the Inter Urban AssisDemonstrator.Derivation of first quantitative cost models for building blocksof the algorithms from reference implementationsOrganization of the workshop on “Embedded Driver AssistanceSystems: Mid-Term Results of the DESERVE Artemis-JU-project”during the SAMOS Conference.

Major results: Finalized reference implementation of selected algorithms for

Page 52: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 52/90

52

Inter Urban Assist Demonstrator.FPGA-based demonstrator connecting the ADTF softwareenvironment with an ML605 development board

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

No deviations from plan.

Statement of used resources: Most resources used as personal costs in SP 2 and SP 4.Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:

No interaction with other projects

Dissemination and exploitation: Three Papers were presented on the International Conference onembedded Computer Systems: Architectures, Modelling andSimulation, SAMOS XIV in Samos Island – Greece from July 14 toJuly 17, 2014.

A Comprehensive ASIC/FPGA Prototyping Environment forExploring Embedded Processing Systems for Advanced DriverAssistance Applications. Florian Giesemann, Guillermo PayáVayá, Holger Blume, Matthias Limmer, Werner RitterInstruction-Set Extension for an ASIP-based SIFT FeatureExtraction. Nico Mentzer, Guillermo Payá Vayá, Holger Blume,Nora von Egloffstein, Werner RitterMassively Parallel Signal Processing Challenges within a DriverAssistant Prototype Framework - First Case Study Results with aNovel MIMO-Radar. Frank Meinl, Martin Kunert, Holger Blume

The Netherlands (TECHNOLUTION B.V.)

2nd year objectives:

Summary of progress:Major results:Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:Statement of used resources:Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:Dissemination and exploitation:

NXP SEMICONDUCTORS NETHERLANDS BV (NXP-NL)Partner number: 72nd year objectives: The 2nd year objectives of WP45 are:

Development of the V2X technology as a 802.11pcommunication link including relevant standards (such as ETSI).High level design of interfaces and functions to enable V2Xtechnology as virtual sensor for cooperative systems.

Develop test scenarios to demonstrate V2X technology.Summary of progress: NXP participates in SP1 and SP2 contributing to the architecture

definition. NXP leads WP4.5 to provide the cooperative systemsfunctions in Deserve and supporting the development ofapplications by other parties with the 802.11p technology in SP5and SP6.Progress of WP4.5: Finished D4.5.1, developed initial prototype of

Page 53: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 53/90

53

V2X technology and provided cooperative modules to WP partnersto develop test case functions

Major results: Initial prototype of V2X technology finishedDevelopment of final prototype of V2X technology isprogressing according to plan.Development of test scenarios is well underway.

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:Statement of used resources: According to planStatement concerning interactionwith other projects:

This WP takes as input the Deserve platform architecture asdefined by SP1 and SP2 and aligns the interface towards the virtualsensor.Furthermore, requirements are checked vis-à-vis projects as TEAM,VRUITS and MOBINET.

Dissemination and exploitation: V2X technology design and architecture has been discussed andvalidated with key customers and OEMs.

TECHNOLUTION B.V. (TECHNO)Partner number: 252nd year objectives: Overall objectives for the second year were:

gaining hands-on experience with the DESERVE design anddevelopment process by designing and developing a dynamiclane guidance service;

gaining hands-on experience with setting up an instantiationof a DESERVE platform as enabling platform for the dynamiclane guidance service

Summary of progress: The connected dynamic lane guidance service (step 1, seeobjectives for the Netherlands) has been designed anddeveloped following the DESERVE process.For the cooperative element (step 2, see objectives for theNetherlands) an instantiation of the DESERVE platform hasbeen created using the V2X unit of NXP / Cohda Wireless (seeresults NXP), the existing Mobiboxx of Technolution (in-vehicletelematics platform) and a radar of Continental;

One step further a design has been made for a a cost-efficientinstantiation of the DESERVE platform that merges the Mobiboxxand the V2X unit of NXP / Cohda Wireless, that can be used in pre-deployment projects.

Major results: Major results within step 1 are:Online traffic state estimator based on a lane based AdaptiveSmoothing Method algorithm of the Delft University ofTechnology and fed with induction loop data;Advice module based on the estimated traffic state;Lane guidance app as overlay over a test version of TomTomnavigator app for Android;Instantiation of TomTom’s LBDO (location based dynamicobjects) for the lane guidance app to retrieve thegeographically relevant advices from.

Major results within step 2 are:DESERVE platform for V2X and radar based collision

Page 54: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 54/90

54

avoidance and merge assistance.design has been made for a a cost-efficient instantiationof the DESERVE platform that merges the Mobiboxx andthe V2X unit of NXP / Cohda Wireless

From the perspective of technical coordination, a technicalgeneral assembly was organised in Gouda in the Netherlands(February 2014) to line up the DESERVE partners andconnected every partner to a demonstrator. Major result wasthat partners were bound to a demonstrator and could followup on the DESERVE design and development process,collaborate on an instantiation of (a part of) the DESERVEplatform and gain hands-on experience.

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

No deviations from plan.

Statement of used resources: Most resources used as personal costs in SP 1, SP 2, SP 4 and SP 5.Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:

Main interaction with:TomTom (not a partner in DESERVE) on the usage of a testversion of the navigation App for Android and the instantiationof the LBDO;

Delft University of Technology on the online traffic stateestimator (bringing it from Mathlab to Java and theconfiguration for the A67).

Dissemination and exploitation: Dissemination activities have been restricted to the Dutchsituation, where the dynamic lane guidance service approach hasbeen presented on several BeterBenutten (programme of theDutch Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment) event organisedby the Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment.

SwedenVOLVO TECHNOLOGY AB (VOLVO)

Partner number: 102nd year objectives: The second year objectives has been:

Development of Volvo commercial vehicle applications.Detailed plan of implementation of DESERVE system into Volvodemonstrator.Prepare implementation of commercial vehicle applicationsinto Volvo demonstrator.Contribution to WP34 Innovative Integrated HMI and WP42Control Functions.

Summary of progress: First prototype of commercial vehicle applications. Parts ofspecified system implemented in Volvo demonstrator.Contributions to WP34 and D34.1. Contribution to WP42 “Controlfunctions”. Finalization of SP1 “Requirement and Specification”contribution. Participation in First Year General Assembly in Ulm.

Major results: Parts of system implemented in Volvo truck. Draft implementationof ACC and AEBS but not yet tested with new system in Volvo truck.

Deviations from Annex I and Delayed submission of the planned deliverable D52.2, due M24.

Page 55: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 55/90

55

planned corrective actions: Planned to be submitted in same time frame as D51.1, due M30.Statement of used resources: Most resources have been used as personell costs in SP5, and

partly also in SP3 and SP4.Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:

-

Dissemination and exploitation: -

Italy (CRF)2nd year objectives: SP coordination (SP3>ICOOR; SP5, SP6, SP8>CRF; SP7>ReLAb)

WP coordination (1.3, 2.3, 3.1, 3.3, 3.4, 5.1, 6.2, 7.1, 7.2)Task coordinationSubmission of deliverable of own responsibilityCoordination of the participation to events (ICOOR), attendingmeetings and webconferences.Technical contribution as planned.

Summary of progress: The Italian project partners coordinated five subprojects andseveral workpackages organising physical / webconference / callmeetings.They submitted seven deliverables of own responsibility out of nineas originally planned.The italian partners contributed to the following main technicalresults:

SP1 - Major contribution was set in defining the process tocollect the specifications of the general DESERVE platform. CRFwas responsible for the submission of D131 DevelopmentPlatform Specification report.SP2 - Definition of the hardware and software platform used onCRF vehicle demonstrators. Definition and integration of thetool chain (PreSCAN/Simulink, RTMaps, CarMaker) to be usedfor the DESERVE development platform. Generic Vehicle Model– First & Final Release (D231, D232). Contribution to thedefinition of the software & hardware architecture, and thestandard interfaces (D252, D254, D256).SP3 – Coordination of SP3 (ICOOR). Definition of a StandardDriver Model (D311). HMI solution design (D341).SP4 - Design of test case functions (warning, control,cooperative) to be integrated on the target vehicledemonstrators. Use of PreScan/Simulink, RTMaps, CarMakertools in MiL, SiL and HiL simulations. Development of VRUdetection system based on stereovision system (VISLAB). Thelow layer of VRU detection has been widely developed and isgoing to be installed on the first demonstrator.SP5 - CRF started the integration on Fiat 500L passenger car ofAEB pedestrian and driver distraction (Conti). The driverintention will be integrated next year. The AEB interurban withthe driver drowsiness and the driver intention will be integratednext year on Jeep Renegade. The relevant use and test caseswere defined providing the necessary input to the softwaredevelopment activities.

Page 56: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 56/90

56

SP6 – Contribution to the definition of a validation plan.SP7 - Coordination of SP7 (RELAB). ICOOR as responsible ofWP71 ICOOR has carried out all of the Dissemination activitiesplanned in PY2 and has coordinated the project participation toseveral events. The preparation of the final event has started.Preparation of D722 Regulatory report and preliminary actionson exploitation.SP8 - Definition of Risk Management and Contingency Plan(D822)

Major results: Submission of the following deliverables of responsibility:D13.1 Development Platform Specification (R)D23.3 Generic Vehicle Model - Final Release (O)D312 Driver model (0)D34.1 HMI solution design (R)D71.3 Workshop report (R)D72.3 Regulatory report (R)D82.2 Risk Management and Contingency Plan (R)

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

CRF is not coordinating the project as originally planned due topending national funding decision.The project is about 4 months behind of the originally plannedschedule. Italian partners agree to postponing the end of theproject.

Statement of used resources: Minor efforts performed by CRF during the second year too, due tosome overlapping projects/tasks. Corrective actions have beenimplemented by CRF.VISLAB still experienced an underspending due to unavailability ofpersonnel.The project extension would be beneficial.

Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:

Interesting projects for DESERVE are linked in DESERVE website.

CRF managed the official link with interactIVe EU project during therequirement and specification definition phase.

Interaction with HoliDes representatives led to identifyingcomplementarities between the experimental activity to be carriedout within the framework of the two projects.

In SP3 previous research projects have been considered:In the SoA for Driver Model definition (e.g. Isi-PADAS, AIDE,INTERACTIVE).In wp 3.2 (Driver Monitoring):

o DETER (1992-1995) EU-funded project. Work on driverimpairment and the development of telematic systemsto monitor driver impairment

o SAVE FP4 (1994-1998) System for Effective Assessmentof Driver State andVehicle Control in Emergency Situations

o PROMETHEUS-PROCHIP(1995) R+D project forImproving the Reliability and Safety of AutomotiveElectronics

Page 57: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 57/90

57

o AWAKE (2000) FP5 EU granted project Development ofSystems for effective Assessment of driver vigilanceand Warning According to traffic risk Estimation

o SENSATION(2004) FP6 EU granted project Deliverables(2004-2008) ‘Advance sensor development forattention Stress vigilance & sleep WakefulnessMonitoring’

o PReVENT (2004-2008) Supporting the driver,preventing accidents

Dissemination and exploitation: Dissemination activities have been performed mainly by ICOOR asresponsible of WP71.D713 Workshop report has been released. Procedures fordissemination have been defined and shared with partners.Partners have been encouraged to disseminate project goals andresults: articles and papers have been presented and published; anevent roadmap has been created.

CONSORZIO INTERUNIVERSITARIO PER L'OTTIMIZZAZIONE E LARICERCA OPERATIVA (ICOOR)

Partner number: 112nd year objectives: Participation to conf calls and meetings.

Liaison with other SPs.Progresses in work on Driver Model to be presented in D312.Coordination of the participation to events. Production of D713(report on the first project workshop).

Summary of progress: SP3: As leader of the SP3 and of Wp3.1 Driver Modelling inparticular, ICOOR organized several conference calls and was intouch with WP leaders in SP3, as well as with other SP leaders.SP4: Roles definition and participation in several conferencecalls. Face-to-face meeting in June 3-4 2014 in Orbassano, atCRF, on WP 4.2 issues.SP5: Continuous dialogue with SP5 leader, in particular for theCRF demo vehicle.SP6: Contribution to D621.SP7: as responsible of all WPs ICOOR has carried out all of theDissemination activities planned in PY2 and has coordinated theproject participation to several events. The preparation of thefinal event has started.

Major results: Liaison activities among SP1, 3, 4,5 and 6. Progresses in the workon the Driver Model, presented in D312. Production ofDissemination material and D713 (report on the first projectworkshop).

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

D713 presented as a draft: the final version will be released afterthe SAMOS event takes place.

Statement of used resources: Used resources are adequateStatement concerning interactionwith other projects:

In particular in Sp3 previous research projects have beenconsidered:

In the SoA for Driver Model definition (e.g. Isi-PADAS, AIDE,INTERACTIVE).In wp 3.2 (Driver Monitoring):

o DETER (1992-1995) EU-funded project. Work on driver

Page 58: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 58/90

58

impairment and the development of telematic systemsto monitor driver impairment

o SAVE FP4 (1994-1998) System for Effective Assessmentof Driver State andVehicle Control in Emergency Situations

o PROMETHEUS-PROCHIP(1995) R+D project forImproving the Reliability and Safety of AutomotiveElectronics

o AWAKE (2000) FP5 EU granted project Development ofSystems for effective Assessment of driver vigilanceand Warning According to traffic risk Estimation

o SENSATION(2004) FP6 EU granted project Deliverables(2004-2008) ‘Advance sensor development forattention Stress vigilance & sleep WakefulnessMonitoring’

o PReVENT (2004-2008) Supporting the driver,preventing accidents

Dissemination and exploitation: See section on SP7RE:LAB S.R.L. (ReLab)

Partner number: 122nd year objectives: Coordination of SP7 Dissemination and exploitation. Contribution

to the definition of HMI Design (WP 3.4) Coordination withpartners in defining research questions and experimental designand procedures aimed at collecting data for on-road tests,targeting manoeuvre recognition.

Summary of progress: RELAB has been involved in the activities related to the design ofthe most suitable HMI, identifying requirements and restrictions,condensed in D3.4.1 - HMI solution designRELAB has also led SP 7 (Dissemination and exploitation) activities,by coordinating partners’ effort.

Major results:Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

There have been some delays due to interdependencies amongwork packages but corrective actions have been implemented so tominimize the risk of further delays in the future.

Statement of used resources: Resources have been spent for personnel and travel costs.Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:

Interaction with HoliDes representatives led to identifyingcomplementarities between the experimental activity to be carriedout within the framework of the two projects.

Dissemination and exploitation: RELAB has led SP 7 (Dissemination and exploitation) activities, bycoordinating partners’ effort. RELAB has led SP 7 (Disseminationand exploitation) activities, by coordinating partners’ effort.

UNIVERSITA DEGLI STUDI DI PARMA (VISLAB)Partner number: 132nd year objectives: Development of VRU detection systemSummary of progress: This year has been primarily focused on the developing of the VRU

detection functions.Major results: The work on the definition of the perception architecture have

been continued and sticked on the main use of a of a stereo visionsystem.Periodic phone meetings were carried out with CRF and, especially,

Page 59: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 59/90

59

CTAGS to coordinate efforts in WP4 and for demonstrators.The low layer of VRU detection has been widely developed and isgoing to be installed on the first demonstrator.Contribution to deliverable 4.3.2

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:Statement of used resources: We still experienced an underspending due to unavailability of

personnel that led to reduce personnel involved in the project.Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:Dissemination and exploitation: No specific or relevant dissemination activities.

CENTRO RICERCHE FIAT SCPA (CRF)Partner number: 202nd year objectives: SP coordination (SP5, SP6, SP8)

WP coordination (1.3, 2.3, 3.4, 5.1, 6.2, 7.2)Task coordinationSubmission of deliverable of own responsibilityAttending meetings and webconferencesTechnical contribution as planned.

Summary of progress: CRF coordinated three subprojects (SP5, SP6, SP8) and fiveworkpackages ( 1.3, 2.3, 3.4, 5.1, 7.2) organising physical /webconference / call meetings.CRF contributed to the following main technical results:

SP1 - Major contribution was set in defining the process tocollect the specifications of the general DESERVE platform. CRFwas responsible for the submission of D131 DevelopmentPlatform Specification report.SP2 - Definition of the hardware and software platform used onCRF vehicle demonstrators. Definition and integration of thetool chain (PreSCAN/Simulink, RTMaps, CarMaker) to be usedfor the DESERVE development platform. Generic Vehicle Model– First & Final Release (D231, D232). Contribution to thedefinition of the software & hardware architecture, and thestandard interfaces (D252, D254, D256).SP3 - Definition of a Driver Model (D312). HMI solution design(D341).SP4 - Design of test case functions (warning, control,cooperative) to be integrated on the target vehicledemonstrators. Use of PreScan/Simulink, RTMaps, CarMakertools in MiL, SiL and HiL simulations.SP5 - CRF started the integration on Fiat 500L passenger car ofAEB pedestrian and driver distraction (Conti). The driverintention will be integrated next year. The AEB interurban withthe driver drowsiness and the driver intention will be integratednext year on Jeep Renegade. The relevant use and test caseswere defined providing the necessary input to the softwaredevelopment activities.SP6 – Contribution to the definition of a validation plan.SP7 - Contributions for dissemination events. Preparation ofD722 Regulatory report and preliminary actions on exploitation.

Page 60: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 60/90

60

SP8 - Definition of Risk Management and Contingency Plan(D82.2)

Major results: Submission of the following deliverables of responsibility:D13.1 Development Platform Specification (R)D23.3 Generic Vehicle Model - Final Release (O)D34.1 HMI solution design (R)D723 Regulatory report (R)D82.2 Risk Management and Contingency Plan (R)

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

CRF is not coordinating the project as originally planned due topending national funding decision.The project is about 4 months behind of the originally plannedschedule. CRF agrees to postponing the end of the project.

Statement of used resources: Minor efforts performed by CRF during the second year too, due tosome overlapping projects/tasks. Corrective actions have beenimplemented by CRF.The project extension would be beneficial.

Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:

CRF managed the official link with interactIVe EU project during therequirement and specification definition phase.

Dissemination and exploitation: Dissemination activities were done on the International Conferenceon embedded Computer Systems: Architectures, Modelling andSimulation, SAMOS XIV in SAMOS Island – Greece from July 14th to17th, 2014.

Kutila, M., Pyykönen, P., van Koningsbruggen, P., Pallaro, N. &Pérez-Rastelli, J. 2014. The DESERVE project: Towards futureADAS functions. Proceedings of the International Conference onEmbedded Computer Systems: Architectures, MOdeling andSimulation (SAMOS XIV). Samos, Greece. 14-17 July 2014. p.308-313.Development and design of a platform for arbitration andsharing control applications –a DESERVE approach-, JoshuéPérez, David González, Fawzi Nashashibi, Fabio Tango, NereoPallaro, Gwenael Dunand, André RolfsmeierKutila, M., Jokela, M., Fruttaldo, S., Montanari, R. & Pallaro, N.2014. Project ownership and steering committee challenges ininternational context. Proceedings of the 2014 InternationalConference on Economics, Management and Development(EMD2014). Interlaken, Switzerland. 22-24 Feb 2014. pp. 35-40.

United KingdomAPPLICATION SOLUTIONS (ELECTRONICS AND VISION) LTD

Partner number: 172nd year objectives: WP41 coordination

SP2 contributionAttending meetings and webconferencesTechnical contribution as plannedASL form of DESERVE platform identifiedASL partial DESERVE platform & cameras installed on VolvoTruck

Page 61: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 61/90

61

Progress ASL WP41 lab prototypes.Summary of progress: ASL attended the first General Assembly Sept 2013. ASL organised

a series of teleconfs for WP4.1 and a small workshop in Lewes forSP4 in Nov 2013, and were instrumental in initiating the TechnicalAssembly in Gouda Feb 2014. ASL are now organising a follow-upseries of teleconfs for WP4.1.ASL made some proposals for ASL participation in passenger cars,which were not accepted, and in Volvo commercial vehicle, whichwere.ASL did some initial appraisal work with RTMaps and identified twomethods for integrating it with ASL components and Volvocomponents to form a DESERVE platform. ASL studied the DESERVEplatform specifications and have made a form of mapping of ASL’spreferred development methods to DESERVE. This is now beingdocumented in SP2 reports.ASL identified two ADAS functions in development at Lewes todemonstrate in WP4.1, and one to demonstrate in WP5.2, andcontinued working on these at Lewes (the initial phases of thiswork not chargeable to DESERVE). ASL identified developmenthardware and support tools and pursued hardware and softwaredevelopment of these, in a package suiting both Volvo Truck andpassenger cars. ASL installed an example of this system in Volvo’struck in Goteburg, and another is installed in a BMW 3 series inLewes. Commissioning of these systems is now underway.

Major results: Coordinating WP41 & first report WP41.1. Specifying & progressingWP5.2 with Volvo Truck and Intempora. Construction ofdevelopment system for Volvo Truck (and for use at Lewes).

Deviations from Annex I andplanned corrective actions:

The preliminary design and implementation tasks for WP4.1 wereshifted from phase 1 to phase 2. Deliverable 41.2 is now indiscussion and it’s clear all partners will benefit from the proposed6 month extension delaying the deliverable from M24 to M30,although a partial deliverable could be made M26-M28.ASL’s demonstrator activity is with Volvo Truck therefore in WP5.2rather than WP5.1. This is regarded as optimal & no correction isneeded.

Statement of used resources: See the table 4.16 Because of the late start to DESERVE, and alsointernal rearrangements following acquisition by ContinentalCorporation, ASL have not been able to ramp labour as fast asplanned.

Statement concerning interactionwith other projects:

ASL has interacted with SP1, SP2 and SP5 through WP41.

Dissemination and exploitation:

Page 62: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 62/90

62

3.3 Deliverables and milestones tables

The following tables provide figures of the deliverable submission rates and statuses concerning delivery by 4th of Nov 2014 (M27). The tablecontains also information concerning delivery of the first year deliverables which were not available by the 1st review meeting and are therefore,expected reviewed in the 2nd review period.

Submitted Expected Rate Submitted Expected RateSP1 Requirements (DAIMLER) 1 1 100 % 0 0 100 %

SP2 ADAS Development Platform (INRIA) 2 2 100 % 10 11 91 %SP3 Driver Behaviour – HMI (ICOOR) 2 2 100 % 1 1 100 %

SP4 Test Case Functions (BOSCH) 4 4 100 % 4 7 57 %SP5 Integration and Tests (CRF) 0 0 100 % 1 1 100 %

SP6 Validation and Evaluation (CRF) 0 0 100 % 0 1 0 %SP7 Dissemination and Exploitation (ICOOR) 0 0 100 % 2 3 67 %

SP8 Project Management (CRF) 1 1 100 % 1 1 100 %TOTAL: 10 10 100 % 19 25 76 %

1st year deliverables 2nd year deliverables

Page 63: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 63/90

63

The list of the deliverables expected in the 2nd review and their status.

Submitted Expected Rate Submitted Expected RateVTT 1 0 100 %ContinentalFicosa 1 1 100 %AVLBosch 2 2 100 %NXP 1 1 100 % 2 2 100 %INFINEON 3 4 75 %DAIMLER 0 1 0 %Volvo 0 1 0 %ICOOR 2 2 100 %ReLabVISLABIRSEEMdSPACE 2 2 100 %INRIA 2 2 100 % 2 3 67 %ASL 1 1 100 % 0 1 0 %IKA 1 1 100 % 0 1 0 %CTAG 1 1 100 %CRF 3 3 100 % 3 4 75 %ARMINESTTSINT 1 1 100 % 1 1 100 %RambollTechnolutionIMS

1st year deliverables 2nd year deliverables

Page 64: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 64/90

64

1st year deliverables:

WP no. Del. no. Deliverable name Lead beneficiary Nature Disseminationlevel

Expecteddelivery date

Deliverydate

1.3 1 Development PlatformSpecification CRF Report RE 28/02/2013 (6

months) 29.12.2013

2.4 3 Generic ADAS Control– First Release INRIA Other RE 31/08/2013

(12 months) 29.11.2013

2.6 2Specification ofDESERVE platformoptimised for virtualtesting

INTEMPORA Report PU 31/08/2013(12 months) 21.3.2014

3.2 1General drivermonitoring moduledefinition

FICOSA Report PU 31/08/2013(12 months) 2.12.2013

3.4 1 HMI solution design CRF Report PU 31/08/2013(12 months) 1.9.2014

4.1 1 Warning functionssolution design ASL Report PU 31/08/2013

(12 months) 7.4.2014

4.2 1 Control functionssolution design IKA Report PU 31/08/2013

(12 months) 13.12.2013

4.4 1 Automated functionssolution design INRIA Report PU 31/08/2013

(12 months) 19.12.2013

4.5 1Cooperative systemsfunctions solutiondesign

NXP Report PU 31/08/2013(12 months) 10.1.2014

8.2 2 Risk Management andContingency Plan CRF Report RE 28/02/2013 (6

months) 29.12.2013

Page 65: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 65/90

65

2nd year deliverables:

WP no. Del. no. Deliverable name Leadbeneficiary Nature Dissemination

levelExpecteddelivery

Actualdelivery

2.1 2 Development system(Final Release) DSPACE Other RE M24 M25

2.1 4 Development method(Final Release) DSPACE Report PU M24 M26

2.2 2DESERVE Perceptionlayer – IntermediateRelease

BOSCH Report RE M18 M19

2.2 3 DESERVE Perceptionlayer - Final Release BOSCH Report PP M24 M23

2.3 3 Generic Vehicle Model –Final Release CRF Other PU M24 M25

2.4 4 Generic ADAS Control –Final Release INRIA Other PP M24 M24

2.5 2Platform SystemArchitecture – FinalRelease

INFINEON Report PU M24 M26

2.5 4 Standard Interfacesdefinition – Final Release INFINEON Report PU M24 M26

2.5 6Guidelines forapplications development– Final Release

INFINEON Report PU M24 M26

2.5 8 DESERVE Platform –Final Release INFINEON Other PU M24

2.6 3Specification of a virtualtest lab for DESERVEdevelopment platform

INTEMPORA Report PU M24 M26

3.1 2 Driver model ICOOR Other PP M24 M24

4.1 2 Warning functionsprototypes ASL Prototype RE M24

4.2 2 Control functionsprototypes IKA Prototype RE M24

Page 66: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 66/90

66

4.3 2 VRU protectionfunctions prototypes CTAG Prototype RE M24 M24

4.4 2 Automated functionsprototypes INRIA Prototype RE M24 M25

4.5 2 Cooperative systemsfunctions prototypes NXP Prototype RE M24 M26

4.5 3Initial V2Xcommunication modulesprototype

NXP Prototype RE M24 M25

4.6 2Inter urban assistprototype systemdescription

DAIMLER Report RE M24

5.2 2Commercial Vehicle -Functions integrated onprototypes

VOLVO Prototype RE M24

5.3 2 Motorcycle pilotprototype VTT Prototype RE M28 M25

6.1 2 Validation Plan INRIA Report PP M18

7.1 3 Workshop report (1) ICOOR Report PU M18 M24

7.2 2 Standardisation Report CRF Report PU M24

7.2 3 Regulatory Report CRF Report PU M18 M25

8.1 2 Second Periodic Report CRF Report PU M24 M25

Page 67: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 67/90

67

Milestones

TABLE 1. MILESTONES

Milestoneno.

Milestone name Work package noLead beneficiary

Delivery date fromAnnex I

AchievedYes/No

Actual / Forecastachievement date

Comments

3 Platformspecification

25 INFINEONTECHNOLOGIESAG

12 No 15 All platformspecificationdocuments havebeen completedunder SP2

4 DESERVEplatform FirstVersion

25 INFINEONTECHNOLOGIESAG

18 Yes 21 Perception layer(D22.2) andADAS (D24.4)has beencompleted. Thefirst prototypesexists

5 DESERVEplatform FinalVersion

25 INFINEONTECHNOLOGIESAG

24 No 21 The finalplatform releases(D25.8) needadaptation

Page 68: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 68/90

68

3.4 Project managementThe major challenge from the project management view is lack of resources due to missing nationalfunding decision in Italy. The original plan was that CRF will coordinate the project which turns outto be impossible due to the existing Artemis rules. However, most of man powers for projectmanagement are allocated for CRF according to the original plan. CRF have kindly providedsupport in management duties as agreed when switching the coordinator role to VTT. In addition,TEKES (Finnish national funding agency) has provided valuable financial aid to be the coordinatoruntil end of the 2nd project year.

In overall the project partners have delivered the results on time and during the second year commonunderstanding to the project objectives is in new level compared to the first year. The interaction hasbeen increased and especially the sub-project leaders have pushed the project forward. Due to slowstart and pending national funding decisions the project is still about 4 months behind of theoriginally planned schedule. The consortium caught about 1 month time in preparing deliverables.However, 6 months extension to the project has been planned in order to guarantee sufficientquality in the final demonstrations.

The project meetings during the 2nd project year:German consortium meeting #4, Ulm, Germany, 10 Oct 2013Finnish consortium meeting, Vantaa, Finland, 6 Nov 20133rd steering group meeting, Conference call, 12 Dec 2013Technical General Assembly on February 5 and 6, 2014 in Gouda, the NetherlandsFinnish consortium meeting, Tampere, Finland, 14 Feb 2014German consortium meeting #5, Paderborn, Germany, 12/13 Mar 20144th steering group meeting, Conference call, 20 Mar 2014Finnish consortium meeting, Tampere, Finland, 21 May 2014Technical meeting, Gouda, the Netherlands, 5-6 Feb 2014WP4.3 workshop, Turin, 3-4 June 2014German consortium meeting #6, Gothenburg, Sweden, 16 Sep 2014General Assembly, Gothenburg, Sweden, 16-17 Sep 2014

An official link was established with interactIVe EU project in order share public documentsconcerning the general software architecture. Only high level information was exchanged withinteractIVe consortium, therefore all software modules needed for the target applications to bedemonstrated (passenger car, commercial vehicle, motorcycle) will be developed in DESERVE.

Dissemination activities:DESERVE introduction in the EUCAR project book 2014.DESERVE workshop in the SAMOS XIV conference. Samos, Greece. 15 July 2014. 7presentations were made to the 30 people audience.Fruttaldo, S., Kutila, M., Pyykönen, P., van Koningsbruggen, P., Pérez-Rastelli, J. 2014.DESERVE project: Design and development of an innovative platform for ADAS. The10th ITS European Congress. Helsinki, Finland. 16-19 June 2014.Kutila, M. & Fruttaldo, S. 2014. DESERVE project: Design and development of aninnovative platform for ADAS. The poster presented in the Transport Research Arena 2014(TRA2014). Paris, France, 14-17 Apr 2014.Kutila, M., Jokela, M., Fruttaldo, S., Montanari, R. & Pallaro, N. 2014. Project ownershipand steering committee challenges in international context. Proceedings of the 2014

Page 69: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 69/90

69

International Conference on Economics, Management and Development (EMD2014).Interlaken, Switzerland. 22-24 Feb 2014. pp. 35-40.Philippe Morignot, Joshue Perez Rastelli & Fawzi Nashashibi. 2014. Arbitration forBalancing Control between the Driver and ADAS Systems in an Automated Vehicle:Survey and Approach. 2014 IEEE Intelligent Vehicle Symposium (IV’14), Dearborn,Michigan, U.S.A. 8-11 June 2014Joshue Perez, Ray Lattarulo and Fawzi Nashashibi. 2014. Dynamic trajectory generationusing continuous-curvature algorithms for door to door assistance vehicles. 2014 IEEEIntelligent Vehicle Symposium (IV’14), Dearborn, Michigan, U.S.A. 8-11 June 2014.Joshué Pérez, David Gonzalez1 and Vicente Milanés. 2014. Vehicle control in ADASapplications -State of the art. Submitted to the Wiley journal.Jens Klimke, Fréderic Christen and Lutz Eckstein. 2014. Defition of a Microscopic TrafficSimulations Driver Model for Inter-Urban Intersections. 21st ITS World Congress, Detroit,MI, USA, 7-11 September 2014.Serena Fruttaldo, Giulio Francesco, Bianchi Piccinini, Daniele Pinotti and Roberto Montanari.2014. DESERVE: driving simulation tests to support the design and implementation ofan algorithm able to recognize in real time the intention of the driver. SIE conference,TurinGonzales, David. Coordinated control and dynamic trajectory planning for cybernetictransportation systems in urban environments. Dissertation planned to be completed inthe DESERVE project.Kutila, M. & Peussa, P. Increasingly Advanced Driver Assistance Systems andentertainment electronics make cars safer and more comfortable. DESERVE pressrelease on 17 July 2014.Kutila, M. DESERVE project objectives. Radio interview in Finland on 23 July 2014.

Page 70: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 70/90

70

3.5 Explanation of the use of the resources

The figure 4 indicates the reported costs and person months per partner during the second project year.Deviation in the partner’s budgets is high causing also strong variation to the effort in the project. CRFis still missing their national funding decision and therefore, they have not spent effort to projectmanagement as much as originally planned. Currently, there are no major overseen problems in orderto generate all the expected results. The only worrying issue is the withdrawal decision of Rambollfrom the consortium and therefore, motorcycle demonstration cannot be fully completed.

Figure 4. The reported costs per partner

Figure 5 gives an impression how the work has been performed in the different sub-projects overthe project life-time and during the 2nd project year. SP1 was almost completed during the firstproject year except some minor adaptation. However, the other sub-projects are still running and areabout 4 months behind the originally planned schedule and therefore, underspending exists in allother sub-projects.

Page 71: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 71/90

71

Figure 5. The reported cumulative and 2nd year person months per sub-project

Figure 6 shows the PM rates per partner including cumulative from begin of the project, during the2nd year and the budgeted one. Some partners are clearly behind of the originally planned schedule.

Figure 6. The reported cumulative and 2nd year person months per partner

Page 72: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 72/90

72

The completion rates of each task have been given in the Table 1.

Table 1. The completion rates of the DESERVE work packages

The person months per WP per partner is given in Table 2 and cost figures during the secondproject year in Tables 3.1 -3.26.

Estimatedcompletion

rate

Budgetedcompletetion

rate VarianceTotal:SP1 RequirementsWorkpackage 11: Applications Needs 100 % 100 % 0 %Workpackage 12: Requirements 100 % 100 % 0 %Workpackage 13: Specifications 100 % 100 % 0 %SP2 ADAS Development PlatformWorkpackage 21: Tools and Development Systems 77 % 100 % 23 %Workpackage 22: Perception Layer 72 % 100 % 28 %Workpackage 23: Vehicle Modelling 100 % 100 % 0 %Workpackage 24: Arbitration/Control 84 % 100 % 16 %Workpackage 25: Platform System Architecture 74 % 100 % 26 %Workpackage 26: Virtual Testing 66 % 100 % 34 %SP3 Driver Behaviour - HMIWorkpackage 31: Driver Modelling 85 % 100 % 15 %Workpackage 32: Driver Monitoring 76 % 95 % 20 %Workpackage 33: Integrated HMI Needs and Specifications 100 % 100 % 0 %Workpackage 34: Innovative Integrated HMI 52 % 89 % 37 %SP4 Test Case FunctionsWorkpackage 41: Warning Functions 39 % 100 % 61 %Workpackage 42: Control Functions 40 % 100 % 60 %Workpackage 43: Vulnerable Road User Protection Functions 95 % 100 % 5 %Workpackage 44: Automated Functions 68 % 100 % 32 %Workpackage 45: Cooperative Systems Functions 48 % 95 % 47 %Workpackage 46: Inter-urban Assist 47 % 100 % 53 %SP5 Integration and TestsWorkpackage 51: Passenger Car Applications 29 % 86 % 57 %Workpackage 52: Commercial Vehicle Applications 37 % 86 % 50 %Workpackage 53: Motorcycle Applications 52 % 86 % 35 %SP6 Validation and EvaluationWorkpackage 61: Validation Plan 100 % 100 % 0 %Workpackage 62: Validation Tests 5 % 53 % 48 %Workpackage 63: Evaluation 0 % 0 % 0 %SP7 Dissemination and ExploitationWorkpackage 71: Dissemination 38 % 69 % 31 %Workpackage 72: Exploitation, Standardisation and Regulatory Issues 21 % 80 % 59 %SP8 Project ManagementWorkpackage 81: Project Management 17 % 69 % 53 %Workpackage 82: Technical Coordination 46 % 69 % 23 %

Page 73: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 73/90

73

Table 2. Cumulative and 2nd project year person months spending of each partner

BudgetCumula

tive2ndyear Budget

Cumulative

2ndyear Budget

Cumulative

2ndyear Budget

Cumulative

2ndyear Budget

Cumulative

2ndyear Budget

Cumulative

2ndyear Budget

Cumulative

2ndyear Budget

Cumulative

2ndyear Budget

Cumulative

2ndyear

Total: 36,0 17,5 8,7 63,0 45,7 25,2 141,0 84,0 44,5 34,0 22,3 13,5 108,0 64,9 29,2 198,0 175,0 83,0 141,0 96,7 64,4 150,0 98,8 49,1 34,0 22,5 14,7SP1 Requirements 4,0 1,8 0,1 4,0 4,0 0,0 3,0 3,0 0,0 3,0 6,3 0,0 12,0 22,1 0,4 7,0 7,0 0,0 10,0 10,0 0,0 20,0 20,4 1,2 5,5 5,5 0,0Workpackage 11: Applications Needs 0,0 0,0 0,0 1,0 1,0 0,0 1,0 1,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 4,0 7,0 0,0 1,0 1,0 0,0 2,0 2,0 0,0 8,0 8,0 0,0 0,5 0,5 0,0Workpackage 12: Requirements 1,0 1,1 0,0 1,0 1,0 0,0 1,0 1,0 0,0 1,0 2,7 0,0 4,0 7,5 0,0 3,0 3,0 0,0 4,0 4,0 0,0 8,0 8,0 0,0 2,0 2,0 0,0Workpackage 13: Specifications 3,0 0,7 0,1 2,0 2,0 0,0 1,0 1,0 0,0 2,0 3,6 0,0 4,0 7,6 0,4 3,0 3,0 0,0 4,0 4,0 0,0 4,0 4,4 1,2 3,0 3,0 0,0SP2 ADAS Development Platform 0,0 0,0 0,0 12,0 12,0 8,0 44,0 29,0 8,0 18,0 8,9 6,9 54,0 34,4 20,7 22,0 22,0 5,0 109,0 86,7 64,4 58,0 55,5 33,9 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 21: Tools and Development Systems 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 3,0 3,0 0,0 18,0 8,9 6,9 10,0 7,3 3,1 3,0 3,0 0,0 24,0 19,4 19,4 10,0 11,2 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 22: Perception Layer 0,0 0,0 0,0 10,0 10,0 7,0 41,0 26,0 8,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 36,0 21,7 13,7 8,0 8,0 2,0 45,0 22,0 22,0 34,0 32,8 26,8 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 23: Vehicle Modelling 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 24: Arbitration/Control 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 25: Platform System Architecture 0,0 0,0 0,0 2,0 2,0 1,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 8,0 5,4 3,9 11,0 11,0 3,0 40,0 45,3 23,0 14,0 11,5 7,1 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 26: Virtual Testing 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0SP3 Driver Behaviour - HMI 14,0 12,2 6,5 21,0 18,9 9,9 40,0 32,0 19,5 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 2,0 0,8 0,7Workpackage 31: Driver Modelling 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 32: Driver Monitoring 11,0 12,2 6,5 12,0 11,0 5,0 24,0 24,0 11,5 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 33: Integrated HMI Needs and Specifications 3,0 0,0 0,0 3,0 3,0 0,0 4,0 3,0 3,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 1,0 0,1 0,0Workpackage 34: Innovative Integrated HMI 0,0 0,0 0,0 6,0 4,9 4,9 12,0 5,0 5,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 1,0 0,7 0,7SP4 Test Case Functions 0,0 0,0 0,0 4,0 2,3 1,3 18,0 8,0 6,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 26,0 0,0 0,0 148,0 134,0 76,0 6,0 0,0 0,0 39,0 20,3 12,5 8,0 7,4 6,5Workpackage 41: Warning Functions 0,0 0,0 0,0 2,0 0,3 0,3 18,0 8,0 6,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 42: Control Functions 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 8,0 7,4 6,5Workpackage 43: Vulnerable Road User Protection Functions 0,0 0,0 0,0 2,0 2,0 1,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 44: Automated Functions 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 45: Cooperative Systems Functions 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 148,0 134,0 76,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 46: Inter-urban Assist 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 26,0 18,1 16,1 0,0 0,0 0,0 6,0 2,9 2,9 39,0 20,3 12,5 0,0 0,0 0,0SP5 Integration and Tests 8,0 0,0 0,0 9,0 4,5 3,9 20,0 9,0 8,5 8,0 3,9 3,4 0,0 3,4 3,4 11,0 8,0 2,0 2,0 0,0 0,0 15,0 0,1 0,1 12,0 8,0 6,7Workpackage 51: Passenger Car Applications 0,0 0,0 0,0 9,0 4,5 3,9 20,0 9,0 8,5 8,0 3,9 3,4 8,0 3,4 3,4 11,0 8,0 2,0 2,0 0,0 0,0 15,0 0,1 0,1 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 52: Commercial Vehicle Applications 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 12,0 8,0 6,7Workpackage 53: Motorcycle Applications 8,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0SP6 Validation and Evaluation 4,0 0,0 0,0 8,0 1,9 1,0 10,0 2,0 1,5 3,0 3,3 3,3 6,0 0,6 0,6 9,0 3,0 0,0 7,0 0,0 0,0 6,0 0,1 0,0 5,0 0,8 0,8Workpackage 61: Validation Plan 1,0 0,0 0,0 2,0 1,4 0,5 2,0 2,0 1,5 0,0 0,0 0,0 2,0 0,3 0,3 3,0 3,0 0,0 2,0 0,0 0,0 2,0 0,1 0,0 2,0 0,1 0,1Workpackage 62: Validation Tests 1,0 0,0 0,0 3,0 0,5 0,5 6,0 0,0 0,0 2,0 2,6 2,6 4,0 0,3 0,3 6,0 0,0 0,0 5,0 0,0 0,0 4,0 0,0 0,0 3,0 0,7 0,7Workpackage 63: Evaluation 2,0 0,0 0,0 3,0 0,0 0,0 2,0 0,0 0,0 1,0 0,7 0,7 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0SP7 Dissemination and Exploitation 2,5 0,1 0,0 5,0 2,1 1,1 6,0 1,0 1,0 2,0 0,0 0,0 6,0 2,3 2,3 1,0 1,0 0,0 7,0 0,0 0,0 8,0 0,4 0,4 1,5 0,0 0,0Workpackage 71: Dissemination 2,5 0,1 0,0 3,0 1,8 0,8 4,0 1,0 1,0 2,0 0,0 0,0 2,0 1,3 1,3 1,0 1,0 0,0 3,0 0,0 0,0 2,0 0,4 0,4 1,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 72: Exploitation, Standardisation and Regulatory Issues0,0 0,0 0,0 2,0 0,3 0,3 2,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 4,0 1,0 1,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 4,0 0,0 0,0 6,0 0,0 0,0 0,5 0,0 0,0SP8 Project Management 3,5 3,4 2,1 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 4,0 2,1 1,8 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 4,0 2,0 1,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 81: Project Management 3,5 3,4 2,1 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 82: Technical Coordination 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 4,0 2,1 1,8 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 4,0 2,0 1,0 0,0 0,0 0,0

NXPVTT CONTI FICOSA AVL BOSCH INFINEON DAIMLER VOLVO

Page 74: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 74/90

74

BudgetCumula

tive2ndyear Budget

Cumulative

2ndyear Budget

Cumulative

2ndyear Budget

Cumulative

2ndyear Budget

Cumulative

2ndyear Budget

Cumulative

2ndyear Budget

Cumulative

2ndyear Budget

Cumulative

2ndyear

Total: 143,0 107,0 54,3 19,0 22,8 16,4 66,0 15,1 8,9 68,0 25,0 12,5 97,0 56,0 38,1 86,0 56,0 38,1 80,0 19,3 18,5 64,0 39,6 21,6SP1 Requirements 12,0 6,5 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 4,0 4,0 0,5 6,0 6,0 0,0 6,0 3,6 0,0 6,0 3,6 0,0 4,0 0,8 0,1 4,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 11: Applications Needs 4,0 3,1 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 2,0 2,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 2,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 4,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 12: Requirements 4,0 2,6 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 2,0 2,0 0,0 4,0 4,0 0,0 3,0 1,8 0,0 2,0 1,8 0,0 2,0 0,8 0,1 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 13: Specifications 4,0 0,8 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 2,0 2,0 0,5 0,0 0,0 0,0 3,0 1,8 0,0 2,0 1,8 0,0 2,0 0,1 0,1 0,0 0,0 0,0SP2 ADAS Development Platform 0,0 0,0 0,0 5,0 5,3 5,3 18,0 7,3 5,8 33,0 9,5 5,5 66,0 52,4 38,1 49,0 52,4 38,1 42,0 7,4 7,4 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 21: Tools and Development Systems 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 5,0 2,3 1,3 10,0 4,0 2,5 31,0 24,1 20,5 6,0 24,1 20,5 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 22: Perception Layer 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 13,0 5,0 4,5 18,0 2,0 0,5 20,0 14,8 9,8 16,0 14,8 9,8 36,0 2,5 2,5 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 23: Vehicle Modelling 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 24: Arbitration/Control 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 12,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 25: Platform System Architecture 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 15,0 13,5 7,8 4,0 13,5 7,8 6,0 4,9 4,9 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 26: Virtual Testing 0,0 0,0 0,0 5,0 5,3 5,3 0,0 0,0 0,0 5,0 3,5 2,5 0,0 0,0 0,0 11,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0SP3 Driver Behaviour - HMI 68,0 72,4 37,8 10,0 8,0 5,6 7,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 25,0 22,7 10,7Workpackage 31: Driver Modelling 48,0 55,8 32,9 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 25,0 22,7 10,7Workpackage 32: Driver Monitoring 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 33: Integrated HMI Needs and Specifications 8,0 11,7 2,0 4,0 2,8 0,5 5,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 34: Innovative Integrated HMI 12,0 4,9 2,9 6,0 5,1 5,1 2,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0SP4 Test Case Functions 13,0 11,1 7,2 0,0 4,2 4,2 6,0 3,7 2,7 23,0 5,0 4,5 15,0 0,0 0,0 12,0 0,0 0,0 26,0 2,6 2,6 35,0 16,9 10,9Workpackage 41: Warning Functions 12,0 7,0 4,1 0,0 0,0 0,0 2,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 26,0 2,6 2,6 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 42: Control Functions 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 12,0 2,0 2,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 35,0 16,9 10,9Workpackage 43: Vulnerable Road User Protection Functions 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 2,4 2,4 4,0 3,7 2,7 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 44: Automated Functions 1,0 4,1 3,2 0,0 1,8 1,8 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 12,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 45: Cooperative Systems Functions 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 2,1 2,1 0,0 0,0 0,0 11,0 3,0 2,5 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 46: Inter-urban Assist 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 15,0 2,3 2,2 0,0 2,3 2,2 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0SP5 Integration and Tests 16,0 4,5 3,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 17,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 3,0 1,0 10,0 0,0 0,0 5,0 0,0 0,0 4,0 3,5 3,5 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 51: Passenger Car Applications 16,0 4,5 3,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 17,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 10,0 0,0 0,0 5,0 0,0 0,0 4,0 1,7 1,7 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 52: Commercial Vehicle Applications 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 3,0 1,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 1,8 1,8 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 53: Motorcycle Applications 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0SP6 Validation and Evaluation 14,0 0,7 0,2 0,0 0,0 0,0 10,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 12,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 61: Validation Plan 4,0 0,7 0,2 0,0 0,0 0,0 3,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 4,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 62: Validation Tests 6,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 4,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 4,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 63: Evaluation 4,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 3,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 4,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0SP7 Dissemination and Exploitation 12,0 10,9 5,9 0,0 0,0 0,0 4,0 0,0 0,0 2,0 1,5 1,5 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,1 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 71: Dissemination 12,0 10,9 5,9 0,0 0,0 0,0 2,0 0,0 0,0 2,0 1,5 1,5 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,1 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 72: Exploitation, Standardisation and Regulatory Issues0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 2,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0SP8 Project Management 8,0 0,9 0,2 4,0 5,3 1,3 0,0 0,0 0,0 4,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 2,0 0,0 0,0 4,0 5,0 5,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 81: Project Management 4,0 0,9 0,2 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 82: Technical Coordination 4,0 0,0 0,0 4,0 5,3 1,3 0,0 0,0 0,0 4,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 2,0 0,0 0,0 4,0 5,0 5,0 0,0 0,0 0,0

ICOOR ReLab VISLAB IRSEEM dSPACE INRIA ASL IKA

Page 75: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 75/90

75

BudgetCumula

tive2ndyear Budget

Cumulative

2ndyear Budget

Cumulative

2ndyear Budget

Cumulative

2ndyear Budget

Cumulative

2ndyear Budget

Cumulative

2ndyear Budget

Cumulative

2ndyear Budget

Cumulative

2ndyear

Total: 72,0 51,2 27,9 418,0 162,5 125,9 8,0 4,4 2,9 22,0 20,0 8,0 52,0 45,1 33,1 23,0 8,0 2,2 94,0 5,5 0,0 72,0 47,0 27,0SP1 Requirements 4,0 4,0 0,0 28,0 28,0 15,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 2,0 6,0 0,0 5,0 4,0 0,0 4,0 3,0 0,0 12,0 3,0 0,0 4,0 4,0 0,0Workpackage 11: Applications Needs 4,0 4,0 0,0 6,0 6,0 4,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 1,0 2,0 0,0 1,0 1,5 0,0 1,0 1,0 0,0 4,0 1,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 12: Requirements 0,0 0,0 0,0 12,0 12,0 6,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 1,0 4,0 0,0 2,0 1,5 0,0 2,0 1,0 0,0 4,0 1,0 0,0 2,0 2,0 0,0Workpackage 13: Specifications 0,0 0,0 0,0 10,0 10,0 5,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 2,0 1,0 0,0 1,0 1,0 0,0 4,0 1,0 0,0 2,0 2,0 0,0SP2 ADAS Development Platform 17,0 15,5 9,1 102,0 68,0 59,5 6,0 3,0 1,5 0,0 7,0 3,0 42,0 39,5 31,5 2,0 1,0 0,0 20,0 1,0 0,0 42,0 30,0 20,0Workpackage 21: Tools and Development Systems 0,0 0,0 0,0 16,0 16,0 14,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 2,0 0,5 27,0 25,2 21,5 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 30,0 19,0 12,0Workpackage 22: Perception Layer 9,0 8,7 5,5 30,0 12,0 12,0 6,0 3,0 1,5 0,0 2,0 0,5 0,0 0,0 0,0 2,0 1,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 6,0 6,0 4,0Workpackage 23: Vehicle Modelling 0,0 0,0 0,0 24,0 24,0 19,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 24: Arbitration/Control 8,0 6,8 3,6 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 25: Platform System Architecture 0,0 0,0 0,0 16,0 9,0 9,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 1,0 1,0 1,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 20,0 1,0 0,0 6,0 5,0 4,0Workpackage 26: Virtual Testing 0,0 0,0 0,0 16,0 7,0 5,5 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 3,0 2,0 14,0 13,3 9,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0SP3 Driver Behaviour - HMI 12,0 8,4 2,9 48,0 29,0 22,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 1,0 1,0 2,0 1,0 1,0 4,0 0,3 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 31: Driver Modelling 0,0 0,0 0,0 12,0 12,0 9,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 32: Driver Monitoring 0,0 0,0 0,0 8,0 4,0 2,5 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 1,0 1,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 33: Integrated HMI Needs and Specifications 6,0 6,0 0,5 8,0 8,0 6,5 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 1,0 1,0 1,0 1,0 0,3 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 34: Innovative Integrated HMI 6,0 2,4 2,4 20,0 5,0 4,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 1,0 0,0 0,0 3,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0SP4 Test Case Functions 27,0 21,0 15,0 66,0 18,0 15,6 0,0 0,0 0,0 10,0 3,0 3,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 3,0 0,9 0,8 38,0 0,5 0,0 26,0 13,0 7,0Workpackage 41: Warning Functions 0,0 0,0 0,0 22,0 7,0 6,2 0,0 0,0 0,0 5,0 1,5 1,5 0,0 0,0 0,0 3,0 0,9 0,8 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 42: Control Functions 0,0 0,0 0,0 22,0 7,0 6,2 0,0 0,0 0,0 5,0 1,5 1,5 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 4,0 0,5 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 43: Vulnerable Road User Protection Functions 12,0 11,2 8,2 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 44: Automated Functions 9,0 6,8 4,1 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 4,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 45: Cooperative Systems Functions 6,0 3,0 2,7 22,0 4,0 3,2 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 30,0 0,5 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 46: Inter-urban Assist 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 26,0 13,0 7,0SP5 Integration and Tests 0,0 0,0 0,0 96,0 8,5 5,5 0,0 0,0 0,0 2,0 3,0 1,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 5,0 1,1 0,1 5,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 51: Passenger Car Applications 0,0 0,0 0,0 48,0 7,0 5,5 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 5,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 52: Commercial Vehicle Applications 0,0 0,0 0,0 48,0 1,5 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 2,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 53: Motorcycle Applications 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 2,0 1,0 1,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 5,0 1,1 0,1 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0SP6 Validation and Evaluation 8,0 2,0 1,0 34,0 3,0 2,5 0,0 0,0 0,0 8,0 0,0 0,0 1,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 6,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 61: Validation Plan 2,0 2,0 1,0 10,0 3,0 2,5 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 2,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 62: Validation Tests 2,0 0,0 0,0 24,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 2,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 63: Evaluation 4,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 8,0 0,0 0,0 1,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 2,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0SP7 Dissemination and Exploitation 4,0 0,4 0,0 12,0 3,0 2,8 2,0 1,4 1,4 0,0 0,0 0,0 2,0 0,6 0,6 5,0 1,7 1,3 1,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 71: Dissemination 4,0 0,4 0,0 4,0 1,0 1,0 2,0 1,4 1,4 0,0 0,0 0,0 2,0 0,6 0,6 2,0 0,8 0,6 1,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 72: Exploitation, Standardisation and Regulatory Issues0,0 0,0 0,0 8,0 2,0 1,8 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 3,0 0,9 0,7 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0SP8 Project Management 0,0 0,0 0,0 32,0 5,0 3,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 12,0 1,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 81: Project Management 0,0 0,0 0,0 24,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0Workpackage 82: Technical Coordination 0,0 0,0 0,0 8,0 5,0 3,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 12,0 1,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0

CTAG IMSCRF ARMINES TTS INT RAMB TECHNO

Page 76: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 76/90

76

TABLE 3.1 PERSONNEL, SUBCONTRACTING AND OTHER MAJOR DIRECT COST ITEMS FORBENEFICIARY VTT FOR SEP 2013 – AUG 2014

WorkPackage Item description

AmountsExplanationsFundamental

research [€]Industrial

research [€]Experimentaldevelopment

[€]Total [€]

WP3.2,WP5.3,WP7.1,WP8.1

Personnel costs 54 762 54 762

SubcontractingWP3.2,WP7.1,WP8.1

Major cost item “x'' 11 076 11 076 travel costs

WP3.2,WP5.3

Major cost item 'y '……….. 1 477 1 477 materials, equipment

WP3.2,WP5.3 Major cost item '' 12 011 12 011 research facility costs

WP3.2 Remaining directcosts 5 412 5 412 training expenditures,

equipment transportationTOTAL DIRECT COSTS‡ 84 738 77 166 84 738

TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS 47 643 43 833 47 643

TABLE 3.2 PERSONNEL, SUBCONTRACTING AND OTHER MAJOR DIRECT COST ITEMS FORBENEFICIARY CONTINENTAL FOR SEP 2013 – AUG 2014

WorkPackage Item description

AmountsExplanationsFundamental

research [€]Industrial

research [€]Experimentaldevelopment

[€]Total [€]

SP2, SP3,SP4, SP5,SP6, SP7

Personnel costs 210 000 210 000 Salaries of senior engineersand experts

Subcontracting

Major cost item 'X' 4 500 4 500

Travels for RtMaps training(September 2013, Paris), ,General assembly (October2013 Ulm), SP2 meeting(February 2014, Gouda)

Major cost item 'Y'……….. 10 000 10 000

Materials, Equipment (interiorcamera, LDW camera)calibration and integrationinside the demonstratorvehicle.

Remaining directcosts

TOTAL DIRECT COSTS 224 500 224 500TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS 125 000 125 000

‡ Total direct and indirect costs have to be consistent with the direct and indirect costs claimed to the National fundingInstitution or, when applicable, to the JU.

Page 77: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 77/90

77

TABLE 3.3 PERSONNEL, SUBCONTRACTING AND OTHER MAJOR DIRECT COST ITEMS FORBENEFICIARY FICOSA FOR SEP 2013 - AUG 2014

WorkPackage Item description

AmountsExplanationsFundamental

research [€]Industrial

research [€]Experimentaldevelopment

[€]Total [€]

WP3, WP4,WP5, WP6,WP7, WP8

Personnel costs 185 135 185 135Salaries of 5 senior engineersand 2 juniors with 40% averagededication to this project

WP2 Subcontracting 45 000 45 000

Universitat Politècnica deCatalunya: ADAS developmentplatform + Drowsinessdetection SW integration toDeserve Platform + SW testtasks

WP2, WP3,WP5

Major cost item'X' 5 769 5 769 Equipment for camera

calibration and test.

Remaining directcosts

TOTAL DIRECT COSTS 235 904 235 904TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS 47 181 47 181 20% Total Direct Costs

TABLE 3.4 PERSONNEL, SUBCONTRACTING AND OTHER MAJOR DIRECT COST ITEMS FORBENEFICIARY AVL FOR PERIOD SEP 2013 - AUG 2014

WorkPackage Item description

AmountsExplanationsFundamental

research [€]Industrial

research [€]Experimentaldevelopment

[€]Total [€]

WP2,WP5,WP6

Personnel costs 92.659 92.659Research activities to defineuse-cases, test-cases andsetup for automated tests andcalibration.

Subcontracting

WP2 Travel 2 641 2 641 GA meeting in Gouda,Technical Meeting in Ulm

Remaining directcosts

TOTAL DIRECT COSTS 95.300 95.300TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS 75.517 75.517

Page 78: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 78/90

78

TABLE 3.5 PERSONNEL, SUBCONTRACTING AND OTHER MAJOR DIRECT COST ITEMS FORBENEFICIARY BOSCH FOR SEP 2013 - AUG 2014

WorkPackage

Itemdescription

AmountsExplanationsFundamental

research [€]Industrial

research [€]Experimentaldevelopment

[€]Total [€]

WP2,4,5,6,8 Personnel costs 345791 34579131,75 PM Scientists, 1,5PM Engineers and 12 PMassistance by a doctoralcandidate

Subcontracting

Travel andSubsistence 4720 4720

Travel cost of Kunert,Martin to several nationaland international projectmeetings (e.g. Tech.Meeting in Gouda on Feb.2014). Frank Meinlpresentation at SAMOSconference in July 2014.,::

Remaining directcosts

TOTAL DIRECT COSTS 38647 38647TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS 303350 303350

TABLE 3.6 PERSONNEL, SUBCONTRACTING AND OTHER MAJOR DIRECT COST ITEMS FORBENEFICIARY NXP-NL FOR SEP 2013 - AUG 2014

WorkPackage Item description

AmountsExplanationsFundamental

research [€]Industrial

research [€]Experimentaldevelopment

[€]Total [€]

WP2.2, 3.0,4.5, 5,1 Personnel costs 1 153 500 1 153 500

Salaries of 18 R&Demployees. This is basedon the Integrall costsystem. Therefore thisincludes also indirectpersonnel costs.

SubcontractingMajor cost item 'X'Major cost item 'Y'

………..Remaining direct

costsTOTAL DIRECT COSTS 692 100 692 100

TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS 461 400 461 400

Page 79: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 79/90

79

TABLE 3.7 PERSONNEL, SUBCONTRACTING AND OTHER MAJOR DIRECT COST ITEMS FORBENEFICIARY INFINEON FOR THE SEP 2013 - AUG 2014

WorkPackage Item description

AmountsExplanationsFundamental

research [€]Industrial

research [€]Experimentaldevelopment

[€]Total [€]

WP2.1,WP2.2,WP2.5,WP4.6

Personnel costs(direct cost) 616 616 616 616 Work in WPs

Subcontracting

indirect cost 382 555 382 555 all indirect costs(including travel)

Major cost item 'Y'………..

Remaining directcosts

TOTAL DIRECT COSTS 616 616 616 616TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS 382 555 382 555

TABLE 3.8 PERSONNEL, SUBCONTRACTING AND OTHER MAJOR DIRECT COST ITEMS FORBENEFICIARY DAIMLER FOR SEP 2013 - AUG 2014

WorkPackage Item description

AmountsExplanationsFundamental

research [€]Industrial

research [€]Experimentaldevelopment

[€]Total [€]

WP1,WP2,WP4,WP5,WP7,WP8

Personnel costs 429 256 429 256

6,82 MM of Dr. Werner Ritter;8,07 MM of Mr. JoachimGloger; 9,53 MM of Mr. StefanFranz; 2,99 MM of Mr. OliverHartmann; 8,31 MM of Mr.Matthias Limmer; 4,54 MM ofDr. Roland Schweiger; 8,57MM of Mrs. Nora vonEgloffstein

WP2 Subcontracting 60 390 60 390University of Ulm:“Modelbased HW/SW-Codesign for drivingassistance systems”

WP2 Major cost item 'X' 11 836 11 836 camera and LVDS to GIGEInterface box

WP1 Major cost item 'Y'……….. 11 590 11 590 dSpace MicroAutoBox

WP1 Major cost item 'Y'……….. 9 666 9 666 VGA FIR camera

WP1Major cost item 'Y'

……….. 4 562 4 562 windscreens with clearglass

WP1Major cost item 'Y'

……….. 3 169 3 169 Interface for headunit

Page 80: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 80/90

80

WP1,WP4 Major cost item 'Y'

……….. 1 722 1 722 Travel costs

Remaining directcosts 4 523 4 523 Other incidentials

TOTAL DIRECT COSTS 536 714 536 714TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS 324 606 324 606

TABLE 3.9 PERSONNEL, SUBCONTRACTING AND OTHER MAJOR DIRECT COST ITEMS FORBENEFICIARY VOLVO FOR SEP 2013 - AUG 2014

WorkPackage Item description

AmountsExplanationsFundamental

research [€]Industrial

research [€]Experimentaldevelopment

[€]Total [€]

WP3.3,WP34,WP42,WP52,WP61

Personnel costs 95724 95724 Mantime spending (direct partof cost)

Subcontracting

WP52 Major cost item 'X' 1063 1063Travel costs Year2:*GA Year 1 in Uhlm*SP2 vs SP5 meeting in Paris

WP42 Major cost item 'Y'……….. 2730 2730 PC for WP42 testing

Remaining directcosts 25 25

TOTAL DIRECT COSTS 99542 99542

TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS 88360 88360 Mantime spending (indirectpart of cost)

Page 81: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 81/90

81

Table 3.11 Personnel, subcontracting and other major Direct cost items forBeneficiary ICOOR for Sep 2013 - Aug 2014

WorkPackage Item description

Amounts Explanations

Fundamentalresearch [€]

Industrialresearch [€]

Experimentaldevelopment

[€]Total [€]

SP3;SP4;SP5;SP6;

Sp7; Sp8

Personnel costs 205 219 205 219

Salary of one Senior Researcherfor 3,96 MM; Salary of oneYoung Researcher for 4,51 MM;Salary of one Associate Professorfor 3,43 MM; Salary of oneYoung Researcher for 11 MM;Salary of one Young Researcherfor 3 MM; Salary of one YoungResearcher for 3 MM; Salary ofone Young Researcher for 4,5MM; Salary of one SeniorResearcher for 3,76 MM; Salaryof one Full Professor for 5,02MM; Salary of one Full Professorfor 4,22 MM; Salary of oneSenior Researcher for 3,44 MM;Salary of one Young Researcherfor 3,76 MM; Salary of oneYoung Researcher for 0,69 MM;

SubcontractingOther direct cost

TOTAL DIRECT COSTS 205 219 205 219

TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS 102 609 102 609 overhead rate 50% of personnelcosts

Table 3.12 Personnel, subcontracting and other major Direct cost items forBeneficiary RELAB for Sep 2013 - Aug 2014

WorkPackage Item description

Amounts Explanations

Fundamentalresearch [€]

Industrialresearch [€]

Experimentaldevelopment

[€]Total [€]

SP2,SP3,SP8

Personnel costs 51 833 51 833

Salary of one YoungResearcher for 4,03 MM ;Salaryof one Young Researcher for0,38 MM ;Salary of one YoungResearcher for 5,86 MM ;Salaryof one Young Researcher for0,48 MM

SubcontractingWebsite realizationOther direct cost

TOTAL DIRECT COSTS 51 833 51 833TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS 25 916 25 916

Page 82: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 82/90

82

TABLE 3.13 PERSONNEL, SUBCONTRACTING AND OTHER MAJOR DIRECT COST ITEMS FORBENEFICIARY VISLAB FOR SEP 2013 - AUG 2014

WorkPackage Item description

AmountsExplanationsFundamental

research [€]Industrial

research [€]Experimentaldevelopment

[€]Total [€]

Personnel costs 22 371 22 371 Around 8 MM of personnelinvolved onto the project

SubcontractingMajor cost item 'X'Major cost item 'Y'

………..Remaining direct

costsTOTAL DIRECT COSTS 22 371 22 371

TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS

TABLE 3.14 PERSONNEL, SUBCONTRACTING AND OTHER MAJOR DIRECT COST ITEMS FORBENEFICIARY IRSEEM FOR SEP 2013 - AUG 2014

WorkPackage Item description

AmountsExplanationsFundamental

research [€]Industrial

research [€]Experimentaldevelopment

[€]Total [€]

Personnel costs PhD student not hiredSubcontracting 19 799 19 799

Major cost item 'X' 5 709 5 709Remaining direct

costs 324 324 Consumables

TOTAL DIRECT COSTS 24 631 24 631

TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS 1 971 1 971 Overhead rate of 8% on allcosts

Page 83: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 83/90

83

TABLE 3.15 PERSONNEL, SUBCONTRACTING AND OTHER MAJOR DIRECT COST ITEMS FORBENEFICIARY DSPACE FOR SEP 2013 - AUG 2014

WorkPackage Item description

AmountsExplanationsFundamental

research [€]Industrial

research [€]Experimentaldevelopment

[€]Total [€]

Personnel costs 213 357 213 357Subcontracting 36 707 36 707Major cost item'travelling costs' 2 180 2 180Remaining direct

costs 31 205 31 205

TOTAL DIRECT COSTS 283 448 283 448TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS 148 500 148 500

TABLE 3.16 PERSONNEL, SUBCONTRACTING AND OTHER MAJOR DIRECT COST ITEMS FORBENEFICIARY INRIA FOR SEP 2013 - AUG 2014

WorkPackage Item description

Amounts

ExplanationsFundamentalresearch [€]

Industrialresearch [€]

Experimentaldevelopment

[€]Total [€]

Personnel costs 195 715 195 7151 Research director,Salaries of 2 ExpertEngineers and 2 PhDsurdents.

Subcontracting

Major cost item'Equipment’ 20 658 20 658

Computers and softwares(PROSIVIC) and ARTEMIS/ cost control

Major cost item‘Material and Kick-

off meeting'

Major cost item‘Travel and

conferences'5 841 5 841

IEEE IV-2014, SAMOSConf., different steeringmeetings

TOTAL DIRECT COSTS 195 715 195 715TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS 26 499 26 499

Page 84: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 84/90

84

TABLE 3.17 PERSONNEL, SUBCONTRACTING AND OTHER MAJOR DIRECT COST ITEMS FORBENEFICIARY ASL FOR SEP 2013 - AUG 2014

WorkPackage Item description

Amounts

ExplanationsFundamentalresearch [€]

Industrialresearch [€]

Experimentaldevelopment

[€]Total [€]

SP1,WP2.2,2.5, 4.1,5.2, 8.2

Personnel costs 122 459 122 459

Software for portably runningASL ADAS algorithms fromsame implementation onmultiple platforms, forrecording and replaying testinput and results. Integrationonto Volvo Truck. DESERVEdocuments & technicalmeetings.

WP2.2,2.5, 5.2 Subcontracting 16 655 16 655

Housings & mounts forcameras andrecording/runtime platforms inVolvo Truck and ASL vehicles.Subcontract not in originalbudget, variation in progressvia UK TSB.

Major cost item'Travelling' 5 591 5 591

Attendance at majorDESERVE meetings, also twotrips to Goteburg for technicalwork with Volvo Truck.

WP2.5,5.2

Major cost item'Durable

Equipment'5 025 5 025

PC-based equipments in ASLvehicles are not limited only toDESERVE lifetime & classedas “durable”, not entirelycharged to DESERVE (UKTSB depreciation rules).

WP2.5,5.2

Major cost itemConsumables 5 511 5 511

Custom equipments onlyuseful in DESERVE orotherwise of short lifetime.

WP8.2 Remaining directcosts 788 788 Hosting of SP4 workshop in

Lewes.TOTAL DIRECT COSTS 156 030 156 030 Sum of above

TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS 16 916 16 916 60% of Personnel Costs

TABLE 3.18 PERSONNEL, SUBCONTRACTING AND OTHER MAJOR DIRECT COST ITEMS FORBENEFICIARY IKA FOR SEP 2013 - JUNE 2014

WorkPackage Item description

AmountsExplanationsFundamental

research [€]Industrialresearch

[€]

Experimentaldevelopment

[€]Total [€]

Personnel costs 55 399 55 399 Sep 2013 – June 2014 (Julyand August missing)

SubcontractingMajor cost item'Consumables' 273 273 Fuel for test drives, Software

licences, hardware for

Page 85: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 85/90

85

measurement system

Major cost item'Travel' 4 790 4 790

Travelling to: Ulm, Ger(Daimler, National meeting),Lewes, UK (ASL, workshop)Gouda, NL (Technolution,GA),Stuttgart, Ger (workshop),Turin (CRF, WP4.2 meeting)Samos, Greece (Conference),

Remaining directcosts

TOTAL DIRECT COSTS 60 463 60 463TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS 36 278 36 278

TABLE 3.19 PERSONNEL, SUBCONTRACTING AND OTHER MAJOR DIRECT COST ITEMS FORBENEFICIARY CTAG FOR SEP 2013 - AUG 2014

WorkPackage Item description

AmountsExplanationsFundamental

research [€]Industrial

research [€]Experimentaldevelopment

[€]Total [€]

2.2; 2.4;3.3; 3.4;4.3;4.4;4.5; 6.1

Personnel costs 84 191 84 191Salaries of 10 engineers parttime from September 2013 toAugust 31st 2014.

Subcontracting

All;WP4.3,WP4.4,WP4.5

Major cost item 'X' 5 580 5 580

Travels for RtMaps training(September 2013, Paris), ,General assembly (October2013, Ulm), SP4 technicalmeetings (November 2013,Lewes and February 2014,Gouda)

Major cost item 'Y'………..

Remaining directcosts

TOTAL DIRECT COSTS 89 771 89 771

TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS 17 954 17 954 overhead rate 20% ofpersonnel costs

Page 86: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 86/90

86

TABLE 3.20 PERSONNEL, SUBCONTRACTING AND OTHER MAJOR DIRECT COST ITEMS FORBENEFICIARY CRF FOR SEP 2013 - AUG 2014

WorkPackage Item description

AmountsExplanationsFundamental

research [€]Industrial

research [€]Experimentaldevelopment

[€]Total [€]

Personnel costs 592.534 592.53417653,49 hSalaries of workers involved inthe activities.

Subcontracting 129.231* 129.231*Use of an external resourceworking at CRF premisesunder the supervision of aCRF’s senior specialist.

Travel ** **

Attendance of the followingmeetings:-SP8 Review meeting,Bruxelles, 29-30 Oct 2013-SP8 General Assembly,Gouda, 25-26 Feb. 2014-SP3 DIDM technical meeting,Reggio Emilia, 25 Mar. 2014-SP4 WP4.2 meeting,Orbassano, 3-4 Jun 2014-SP8 General Assembly,Goteborg, 16-17 Sept. 2014

Consumables 41.089 41.089

Hardware platform for rapidprototyping, CarMaker SWlicence rental, electronicalcomponents, mechanicalcomponents

Remaining directcosts

TOTAL DIRECT COSTS 762.854 762.854

TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS 296.267 296.267 Overhead rate 50% ofpersonnel costs

* The request for the involvement of external consultants was submitted to the Project Coordinator at the beginning of2014 and this request will be included in the proposed changes for the second contract amendment.

We needed to rely on the work of external consultants within the following activities:WP2.1 Tools and development systems: SW integration activities in RTMaps, Prescan /CarMaker simulationsWP4.1-4.2 Warning & control functions: development and testing of IWI module (e.g. warning strategies),simulation of the complete software architecture related to the demo vehicle warning/control functionsWP5.1 Passenger Car Application: SW and HW integration on vehicle

With the support of a body rental working at our premises, within our ADAS group and under our supervision we wasable to guarantee the achievement of the WP objectives in the most efficient and timely way.

The selection procedure was conducted in full respect of the FP7 regulations and of our applied company procedures.The activity was developed under the supervision of the technical responsible for the project.

The estimated amount for the activity of these consultants is about 129.000€ corresponding to approximately 13PM thatwe would take off from our total effort and from our total RTD personnel costs shifting such amount on subcontracting.At this purpose, we would like to point out that according the current national legislation we cannot claim the costs of ourin house consultants as personnel costs as we cannot require them to record the daily presence.

** The travel costs are not exposed since this category cost cannot be funded in agreement with the national fundingrules.

Page 87: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 87/90

87

TABLE 3.21 PERSONNEL, SUBCONTRACTING AND OTHER MAJOR DIRECT COST ITEMS FORBENEFICIARY ARMINES FOR SEP 2013 - AUG 2014

WorkPackage Item description

AmountsExplanationsFundamental

research [€]Industrialresearch

[€]

Experimentaldevelopment

[€]Total [€]

WP22 Personnel costs 15 710 15 710 252 h senior engineerWP71 Personnel costs 3 234 3 234 52 h senior engineer

Subcontracting

WP71 Major cost itemKick-off meeting' 422 422

Major cost item 'Y'………..

Remaining directcosts

TOTAL DIRECT COSTS 19 366 19 366TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS 12 911 12 911

TABLE 3.22 PERSONNEL, SUBCONTRACTING AND OTHER MAJOR DIRECT COST ITEMS FORBENEFICIARY TTS FOR SEP 2013 - AUG 2014

WorkPackage Item description

AmountsExplanationsFundamental

research [€]Industrial

research [€]Experimentaldevelopment

[€]Total [€]

Personnel costs 48 666 48 666SubcontractingMajor cost item'Travel costs' 13 728 13 728

Major cost item'Overhead

costs/Indirect costs'………..

24 333 24 333

Major cost item'Others' ……….. 5 339 5 339Remaining direct

costsTOTAL DIRECT COSTS 67 734 67 734

TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS 24 333 24 333

Page 88: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 88/90

88

TABLE 3.23 PERSONNEL, SUBCONTRACTING AND OTHER MAJOR DIRECT COST ITEMS FORBENEFICIARY INTEMPORA FOR SEP 2013 - AUG 2014

WorkPackage Item description

AmountsExplanationsFundamental

research [€]Industrial

research [€]Experimentaldevelopment

[€]Total [€]

Personnel costs 438 409 438 409SubcontractingSimulink licence 7 602 7 602

Remaining directcosts 1 774 1 774

Training session at Mines-ParisTech hosted by INTTravels :Meeting at Daimler (ULM)Meeting at Technolution(Gouda)

TOTAL DIRECT COSTS 447 785 447 785TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS

TABLE 3.24 PERSONNEL, SUBCONTRACTING AND OTHER MAJOR DIRECT COST ITEMS FORBENEFICIARY RAMBOLL FOR SEP 2013 - AUG 2014

WorkPackage Item description

AmountsExplanationsFundamental

research [€]Industrial

research [€]Experimentaldevelopment

[€]Total [€]

Personnel costsSubcontracting

Travel costsOther costs

Remaining directcosts

TOTAL DIRECT COSTS 96 408 96 408TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS

Page 89: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 89/90

89

TABLE 3.25 PERSONNEL, SUBCONTRACTING AND OTHER MAJOR DIRECT COST ITEMS FORBENEFICIARY TECHNOLUTION FOR SEP 2013 - AUG 2014

WorkPackage Item description

Amounts

ExplanationsFundamentalresearch [€]

Industrialresearch [€]

Experimentaldevelopment

[€]Total [€]

Personnel costs 231 909 231 909

Work done within DESERVE:19 MM (principal consultantand technical coordinator)3 MM project manager8MM Senior consultant5 MM Consultant5 MM Designer

Subcontracting 0 0 n.a.

Travel costs 200 200 1st Annual review meeting inBrussels

Remaining directcosts 2 867 2 867

Meeting room arraignments atthe Best Western in Gouda(the Netherlands)P for theTechnical General Assembly

TOTAL DIRECT COSTS 250 368 250 368TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS 139 145 139 145

TABLE 3.26 PERSONNEL, SUBCONTRACTING AND OTHER MAJOR DIRECT COST ITEMS FORBENEFICIARY IMS FOR SEP 2013 - AUG 2014

WorkPackage Item description

Amounts

ExplanationsFundamentalresearch [€]

Industrialresearch [€]

Experimentaldevelopment

[€]Total [€]

Personnel costs 135 392 135 392 salariesSubcontracting

Major cost item '1' 1 151 1 151 travel costsConsumables

Remaining directcosts

TOTAL DIRECT COSTS 136 542 136 542TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS 27 308 27 308 overhead 20%

Page 90: PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT - Deserve Project · The project has requested contract amendment for applying 6 months extension to the timeline. The overall estimate is that the project

DESERVE (295364) – 1st year annual report 90/90

90

4. Beneficiaries without a corresponding National GrantAgreement

Certificates

Beneficiary Organisationshort name

Certificate onthe financialstatementsprovided?yes / no

Any useful comment, inparticular if a certificate is notprovided

1 VTT no Expenditure threshold not reached2 Conti no Expenditure threshold not reached3 FICOSA no Expenditure threshold not reached5 AVL no Expenditure threshold not reached6 Bosch no Expenditure threshold not reached7 NXP-NL no Expenditure threshold not reached8 Infineon no Expenditure threshold not reached9 Daimler no Expenditure threshold not reached10 Volvo no Expenditure threshold not reached11 ICOOR no Expenditure threshold not reached12 ReLab no Expenditure threshold not reached13 VISLAB no Expenditure threshold not reached14 IRSEEM no Expenditure threshold not reached15 dSPACE no Expenditure threshold not reached16 INRIA no Expenditure threshold not reached17 ASL no Expenditure threshold not reached18 IKA no Expenditure threshold not reached19 CTAG no Expenditure threshold not reached20 CRF no Expenditure threshold not reached21 ARMINES no Expenditure threshold not reached22 TTS no Expenditure threshold not reached23 INTEMPORA no Expenditure threshold not reached24 Ramboll no Expenditure threshold not reached25 Technolution no Expenditure threshold not reached26 IMS no Expenditure threshold not reached